ABSTRACT
Brainstem tumors account for 10-20% of pediatric brain tumors with a peak age of diagnosis between 7 and 9 years old and are often fatal. Historically, diagnosis of brainstem tumors has been largely based on imaging; however, recent studies have demonstrated the incongruities between preoperative MRI diagnosis and postoperative pathological findings highlighting the importance of brainstem biopsy for diagnostic accuracy. Stereotactic brainstem biopsy for pediatric brainstem tumors has been proven to be safe with a high diagnostic yield (96.1-97.4%) and relatively low morbidity and mortality. Successful pediatric brainstem tumor biopsy demands intricate knowledge of brainstem anatomy, cranial nerves and vasculature, and common pediatric brainstem tumors by the performing surgeon. Additionally, understanding of the surgical indications and techniques (e.g., frame-based versus frameless, robotic assistance, surgical approach, and targets selection) helps to ensure maximal safety and tissue yield. Pediatric brainstem biopsy permits histological conformation of brainstem lesions leading to accurate diagnosis and the potential for personalized treatment and future therapeutic research.
Subject(s)
Brain Stem Neoplasms , Humans , Brain Stem Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Stem Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Stem Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Child , Biopsy/methods , Brain Stem/pathology , Brain Stem/surgery , Brain Stem/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted biopsies have gained popularity in the last years. Most robotic procedures are performed with a floor-based robotic arm. Recently, Medtronic Stealth Autoguide, a miniaturized robotic arm that work together with an optical neuronavigation system, was launched. Its application in pediatric cases is relatively unexplored. In this study, we retrospectively report our experience using the Stealth Autoguide, for frameless stereotactic biopsies in pediatric patients. METHODS: Pediatric patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using the Stealth Autoguide cranial robotic platform from July 2020 to May 2023 were included in this study. Clinical, neuroradiological, surgical, and histological data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent 20 procedures (mean age was 9-year-old, range 1-17). In four patients, biopsy was part of a more complex surgical procedure (laser interstitial thermal therapy - LITT). The most common indication was diffuse intrinsic brain stem tumor, followed by diffuse supratentorial tumor. Nine procedures were performed in prone position, eight in supine position, and three in lateral position. Facial surface registration was adopted in six procedures, skull-fixed fiducials in 14. The biopsy diagnostic tissue acquisition rate was 100% in the patients who underwent only biopsy, while in the biopsy/LITT group, one case was not diagnostic. No patients developed clinically relevant postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The Stealth Autoguide system has proven to be safe, diagnostic, and highly accurate in performing stereotactic biopsies for both supratentorial and infratentorial lesions in the pediatric population.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Image-Guided Biopsy/instrumentation , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Infant , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neuronavigation/methods , Neuronavigation/instrumentation , Stereotaxic Techniques/instrumentationABSTRACT
Both the transfrontal and the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are frequently used trajectories for frame-based stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which approach is more favorable in terms of complications, diagnostic success and outcome, especially considering the location of the lesion within the brainstem. This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of these two approaches. Furthermore, a brainstem zone model was created to answer the question, whether there is a favorable approach depending on the location of the lesion in the brainstem. A retrospective analysis of 84 consecutive cases of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions via either transfrontal or suboccipital-transcerebellar approaches over a 16-year period was performed. Clinical and surgical data regarding trajectories, histopathology, complications and outcome was collected. The brainstem was divided in anatomical zones to compare the use of the two approaches depending on the location of the lesions. A total of n = 84 cases of stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions were performed. In 36 cases the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach was used, while in 48 cases surgery was performed via the transfrontal approach. The patient's demographic data were comparable between the two approaches. Overall diagnostic yield was 90.5% (93.8% transfrontal vs. 86.1% suboccipital, p = 0.21, Risk Difference (RD) 0.077, CI [-0.0550, 0.2090]). Complications occurred in 11 cases (total complication rate: 13.1%; 12.5% transfrontal vs. 13.9% suboccipital, p = 0.55, RD 0.014, CI [-0.1607, 0.1327]). The brainstem model showed a more frequent use of the suboccipital approach in lesions of the dorsal pons. The transfrontal approach was used more frequently in mesencephalic targets. No significant differences in terms of complications and diagnostic yield were observed, even though complications in medullary lesions appeared higher using the transfrontal approach. This study showed, that if the approaches are used for their intended target locations there are no significant differences between the transfrontal and the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach for frame-based stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions in terms of diagnostic yield and safety. Therefore, our data suggests that both approaches should be considered for stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions.
Subject(s)
Brain Stem Neoplasms , Brain Stem , Stereotaxic Techniques , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Brain Stem/pathology , Brain Stem/surgery , Aged , Brain Stem Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Stem Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy/methods , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Neurosurgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic approaches to diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) remain essential due to advances in molecular biology and management, necessitating tissue sampling. Here we present an effective technique with a biopsy by robot-assisted transcerebellar approach. METHOD: Our procedure was performed using the ROSA robotic system and the OARM CT scan, which provided stereotactic conditions for this transcerebellar approach to brainstem lesions. CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted transcerebellar stereotactic approach remains essential to provide complications for biopsy of brainstem lesions.
Subject(s)
Brain Stem Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Stereotaxic Techniques , Humans , Brain Stem Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Stem Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Stem Neoplasms/pathology , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Brain Stem/surgery , Brain Stem/pathology , Brain Stem/diagnostic imaging , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma/surgery , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma/pathology , Male , Cerebellum/surgery , Cerebellum/diagnostic imaging , Cerebellum/pathology , FemaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Lesions of the posterior fossa (brainstem and cerebellum) are challenging in diagnosis and treatment due to the fact that they are often located eloquently and total resection is rarely possible. Therefore, frame-based stereotactic biopsies are commonly used to asservate tissue for neuropathological diagnosis and further treatment determination. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and diagnostic success rate of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for lesions in the posterior fossa via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database analysis of all frame-based stereotactic biopsy cases at our institution since 2007. The aim was to identify all surgical cases for infratentorial lesion biopsies via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach. We collected clinical data regarding outcomes, complications, diagnostic success, radiological appearances, and stereotactic trajectories. RESULTS: A total of n = 79 cases of stereotactic biopsies for posterior fossa lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach (41 female and 38 male) utilizing the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system were identified. The mean age at the time of surgery was 42.5 years (± 23.3; range, 1-87 years). All patients were operated with intraoperative stereotactic imaging (n = 62 MRI, n = 17 CT). The absolute diagnostic success rate was 87.3%. The most common diagnoses were glioma, lymphoma, and inflammatory disease. The overall complication rate was 8.7% (seven cases). All patients with complications showed new neurological deficits; of those, three were permanent. Hemorrhage was detected in five of the cases having complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.6%, and 1-year survival rate was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that frame-based stereotactic biopsies with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are safe and reliable for infratentorial lesions bearing a high diagnostic yield and an acceptable complication rate. Further research should focus on the planning of safe trajectories and a careful case selection with the goal of minimizing complications and maximizing diagnostic success.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Stereotaxic Techniques , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Brain Stem/surgery , Cerebellum/surgery , Biopsy/methods , Brain Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The gold standard for diagnostics in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy. Yet, PCNSL has a multidisciplinary diagnostic work up, which associated with diagnostic delay and could result in treatment delay. This article offers recommendations to neurosurgeons involved in clinical decision-making regarding (novel) diagnostics and care for patients with PCNSL with the aim to improve uniformity and timeliness of the diagnostic process for patients with PCNSL. METHODS: We present a mini review to discuss the role of stereotactic biopsy in the context of novel developments in diagnostics for PCNSL, as well as the role for cytoreductive surgery. RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid-based diagnostics are supplementary and cannot replace stereotactic biopsy-based diagnostics. CONCLUSION: Histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy of the brain remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Additional diagnostics should not be a cause of diagnostic delay. There is currently no sufficient evidence supporting cytoreductive surgery in PCNSL, with recent studies showing contradictive data and suboptimal study designs.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Delayed Diagnosis , Lymphoma , Time-to-Treatment , Humans , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/surgery , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Lymphoma/surgery , Lymphoma/pathology , Neurosurgeons , Biopsy/methods , Stereotaxic Techniques , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment DelayABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-VAB) for microcalcifications in the breast. METHODS: Retrospective review of 131 mammography-guided VABs at our institution were performed. All of the targets were calcification lesion suspicious for cancer. 45 consecutive stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies (ST-VABs) and 86 consecutive DBT-VABs were compared. Written informed consent was obtained. Tissue sampling methods and materials were the same with both systems. Student's t-test was used to compare procedure time and the Fisher's exact test was used to compare success rate, complications, and histopathologic findings for the 2 methods. RESULTS: The tissue sampling success rate was 95.6% for ST-VAB (43/45) and 97.7% (84/86) for DBT-VAB. Time for positioning (10.6 ± 6.4 vs. 6.7 ± 5.3 min), time for biopsy (33.4 ± 13.1 vs. 22.5 ± 13.1 min), and overall procedure time (66.6 ± 16.6 min vs. 54.5 ± 13.0 min) were substantially shorter with DBT-VAB (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the distribution of pathological findings between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Depth information and stable visibility of the target provided by DBT images led to quick decisions about target coordinates and improved the clinical performance of microcalcification biopsies.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Calcinosis , Humans , Female , Japan , Mammography/methods , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Biopsy, Needle , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Biopsy , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Intraoperative neurophysiology (ION) in brainstem surgery evolved as brainstem surgery advanced.The original idea of brainstem mapping (BSM) is a neurophysiological procedure to locate cranial nerve motor nuclei (CNMN) on the floor of the fourth ventricle. With the introduction of various skull base approaches to the brainstem, BSM is carried out on any surface of the brainstem to expose the safe entry zone to the intrinsic brainstem lesion. It is the modern concept of BSM, a broader definition of BSM. BSM enables to avoid direct damage to the CNMN when approaching the brainstem through the negative mapping region.The corticobulbar tract (CBT) motor evoked potential (MEP) is another ION procedure in brainstem surgery. It enables monitoring of the functional integrity of the whole cranial motor pathway without interrupting surgical procedures. Combined application of both BSM and CBT-MEP monitoring is indispensable for the functional preservation of the CNMN and their supranuclear innervation during the brainstem surgery.In this paper, the neurophysiological aspect of BSM and the CBT-MEP was fully described. Normal anatomical background of the floor of the fourth ventricle and the detail of the CBT anatomy were demonstrated to better understand their clinical usefulness, limitations, and surgical implications derived from ION procedures. Finally, a future perspective in the role of ION procedures in brainstem surgery was presented. The latest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology can allow surgeons to find an "on the image" safe entry zone to the brainstem. However, the role of BSM and the CBT-MEP monitoring in terms of safe brainstem surgery stays unshakable. Special attention was paid for the recent trend of management in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. A new role of BSM during a stereotactic biopsy was discussed.It is the authors' expectation that the paper enhances the clinical application of a contemporary standard of the ION in brainstem surgery and supports safer brainstem surgery more than ever and in the future.
Subject(s)
Brain Stem Neoplasms , Neurophysiology , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Brain Stem Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Thalamic tumors are rare and uncommonly manifest as movement disorders, including hemidystonia. Despite this association, little is known about the evolution of hemidystonia. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report on a 11-year-old boy who complained of hypaesthesia and fine motor problems in the left hand. A magnetic resonance imaging showed a large mass in the right thalamus. Stereotactic biopsy revealed a WHO grade 4 astrocytoma, and the patient underwent normofractioned radiochemotherapy with proton-beam radiation and temozolomide. Three months later, a spastic hemiparesis developed on the left side, which progressed over months. Over the following months, the hemiparesis slowly improved, but hemidystonia in the same side developed. This was accompanied with radiological evidence of tumor regression, showing a persistent lesion in the ventral posterolateral and the intralaminar thalamus. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the unusual and complex temporal course of appearance and disappearance of hemidystonia along with the regression and growth in glioblastoma involving the thalamus.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Dystonia , Dystonic Disorders , Glioblastoma , Male , Child , Humans , Glioblastoma/pathology , Radiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Thalamus/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: With the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, delivering sufficient representative tissue for such analyses is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after frame-based stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Cases were classified into three groups: conclusive, diagnosis with missing molecular genetics (MG) data, and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 145 patients, a conclusive diagnosis was possible in n = 137 cases (94.5%). For 3 cases (2.0%), diagnosis was established with missing MG data. In 5 cases (3.5%), an inconclusive (tumor) diagnosis was met. Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (n = 73, 56%), CNS lymphomas (n = 23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n = 14, 10%), and metastases (n = 5, 3%). Methylomics were applied in 49% (n = 44) of tumor cases (panel sequencing in n = 28, 30% of tumors). The average number of specimens used for MG diagnostics was 5, while the average number of specimens provided was 15. In a univariate analysis, insufficient DNA was associated with an inconclusive diagnosis or a diagnosis with missing MG data (p < 0.001). Analyses of planned and implemented trajectories of cases with diagnosis with missing MG data or inconclusive diagnosis (n = 8) revealed that regions of interest were reached in almost all cases (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Although stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear high histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yields. Given the proven surgical precision of the planned biopsy trajectories, optimizing surveyed lesion regions could help improve the rate of conclusive diagnoses.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Stereotaxic Techniques , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Pathology, Molecular , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , BiopsyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The cytolytic effect of corticosteroids on primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has established the clinical dogma of avoiding steroid therapy prior to surgery for diagnostic purposes. However, since steroids are very useful during the initial management of intracranial lesions with vasogenic oedema, it was our aim to determine whether they cause a drawback in the diagnosis and prognosis of PCNSL. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2000 and 2020 in our tertiary neurosurgical centre. Data on steroid administration, surgery type and complications, haematopathological findings and prognostic factors were compiled. A second cohort was used as a control group to compare the ratio of non-diagnostic biopsies; this series comprised patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy for any reason between 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: Forty patients with PCNSL were included in the study, of which 28 (70%) had received steroids before surgery. The use of steroids was more prevalent in patients with poorer performance status at diagnosis. No relevant differences were found in the diagnostic accuracy regardless of steroid exposure (93% under steroids vs 100% without steroids) or type of surgery performed. Furthermore, steroid withdrawal did not seem to augment the diagnostic ratio. The notable diagnostic delay was not influenced by the use of steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Novel imaging and surgical techniques might obviate the need to withhold corticosteroids from patients suffering from PCNSL prior to biopsy. Moreover, when steroids have been given, tapering them and delaying the surgery might not be justified. This could hold relevant therapeutic implications in the early clinical stages.
ABSTRACT
Stereotactic biopsy and open biopsy represent useful diagnostic tools of breast lesions. However, both affect the Quality of Life (QoL) in various degrees. We conducted this prospective longitudinal comparative study in order, first to access the impact of these techniques on short-term QoL and second to compare and critically discuss our results with those of literature review. Group A (58 patients) underwent vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy and Group B (46 patients) underwent open biopsy. The Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQol) was estimated using the European Quality of Life scale (EuroQol) and the SF-36 (The 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey) questionnaires. The stereotactic breast biopsy seems to be more accepted from the patients as it affects quality of life to a lesser extent than open breast biopsy. This difference is mainly attributable to a reduction of physical discomfort and pain.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Breast/pathology , Mammography , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Since the publication of the first imaging-guided wire localisation technique, the art of breast treatments has made great strides. Radiologists like Hall, Frank, Kopans, DeLuca, and Homer were all the pioneers in innovative breast interventional radiology field. Their approaches and gadgets for enhancing surgical outcomes in cases with breast diseases aided progress in the discipline and have withstood the ravages of time. Many of their methods are still in use. We are all standing together at the beginning of a new chapter in medicine. Cost effectiveness, comparative effectiveness studies, and an older population are all causing clinicians to reconsider what they perform. Similarly, we are now united on a global scale. The studies described in the current narrative review relate to multiple nations around the world. Breast cancer is a worldwide health problem. With the expansion of technological advances, as well as the apparent ease of worldwide travel, we must all collaborate to improve the outcome in the battle against breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Medicine , Humans , Female , Radiology, Interventional , Mammography/methods , Breast , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are prone to high surgical risks, and they could even lead to death due to their specific sites. To determine the value of frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies of DIPGs, when compared it with microsurgical biopsies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 71 pediatric patients who underwent biopsies from January 2016 to January 2021. (i) group 1: microsurgical biopsies, and (ii) group 2: frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies. Demographic information, neuroimaging characteristics, pathological diagnoses, operation time, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay time, postoperative hospitalization time, complications, cost, and perioperative mortality rate (POMR) were collected for analyses. RESULTS: 32 Cases underwent microsurgical biopsies (group 1) and 39 cases underwent frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies (group 2). All cases were accurately diagnosed after surgery. There was no significant difference in gender, age, symptom times and tumor volumes between the two groups (p > 0.05); operation time, postoperative ICU, stay time and postoperative hospitalization time were longer in group 1 than in group 2 (p < 0.001); the intraoperative bleeding volumes and cost were higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p < 0.001). Group 1 patients required more perioperative blood transfusion than group 2 (p = 0.001), and the new neurological impairments were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.003). The POMR was 9.38% (3/32) in group 1 and 0 in group 2 (p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsy was an effective and minimally invasive technique for pediatric DIPGs.
Subject(s)
Astrocytoma , Brain Stem Neoplasms , Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma , Robotics , Humans , Child , Stereotaxic Techniques , Retrospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Brain Stem Neoplasms/surgery , Astrocytoma/surgery , BiopsyABSTRACT
Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a grade 4 glioma with a poor prognosis. Surgical treatment of these cancers has been reviewed in the literature with some recent studies supporting resection as a safe and effective treatment instead of biopsy and adjuvant therapy. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether there are significant differences in overall survival (OS) and postoperative neurologic deficits (motor, speech, and cranial nerve) following intervention in patients who underwent tumor resection as part of their treatment, compared to patients who underwent biopsy without surgical resection. A literature search was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify articles from each database's earliest records to May 25, 2021, that directly compared the outcomes of biopsy and resection in bGBM patients and met predetermined inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of the two management strategies on OS and postoperative neurologic deficits. Six articles met our study inclusion criteria. OS was found to be significantly longer for the resection group at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.05) and 12 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.10-12.76) than for the biopsy group. No statistically significant differences were found in OS at 18 and 24 months. Resection was associated with an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficit (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.02-4.09). Resection offers greater OS up to 1 year postintervention than biopsy alone; however, this comes at the cost of higher rates of postoperative neurologic deficits.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Glioma , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Glioma/surgery , Biopsy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The use of intraoperative imaging has been a critical tool in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium and is of particular benefit during tumor surgery. This article summarizes the history of its development, implementation, clinical experience and future directions. METHODS: We reviewed the literature focusing on the development and clinical experience with intraoperative MRI. Utilizing the authors' personal experience as well as evidence from the literature, we present an overview of the utility of MRI during neurosurgery. RESULTS: In the 1990s, the first description of using a low field MRI in the operating room was published describing the additional benefit provided by improved resolution of MRI as compared to ultrasound. Since then, implementation has varied in magnetic field strength and in configuration from floor mounted to ceiling mounted units as well as those that are accessible to the operating room for use during surgery and via an outpatient entrance to use for diagnostic imaging. The experience shows utility of this technique for increasing extent of resection for low and high grade tumors as well as preventing injury to important structures while incorporating techniques such as intraoperative monitoring. CONCLUSION: This article reviews the history of intraoperative MRI and presents a review of the literature revealing the successful implementation of this technology and benefits noted for the patient and the surgeon.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Neuronavigation , NeurosurgeonsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of English articles retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and APA psycInfo databases up to May 12, 2021. A binary fixed-effect model, the inverse variance method, or a binary random-effect model, the Dersimonian Laird method, were utilized for pooling the data. This meta-analysis was registered with INPLASY, INPLASY202190034. FINDINGS: A total of 41 eligible studies with 2792 participants were included. The weighted average diagnostic yield was 97.0% (95% confidential interval [CI], 96.0-97.9%). The weighted average proportions of temporary complications, permanent deficits, and deaths were 6.2% (95% CI, 4.5-7.9%), .5% (95% CI, .2-.8%), and .3% (95% CI, .1-.5%), respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated a nearly identical weighted average diagnostic yield between MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy and CT-guided stereotactic biopsy (95.9% vs 95.8%) but slightly increased proportions of temporary complications (7.9% vs 6.0%), permanent deficits (1.9% vs .2%), and deaths (1.1% vs .4%) in the former compared to the latter. Moreover, a greater weighted average diagnostic yield (99.2% vs 97.6%) and lower proportions of temporary complications (5.1% vs 6.8%) and deaths (.7% vs 1.5%) were shown in the pediatric patient population than in the adult patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Brainstem stereotactic biopsy demonstrates striking accuracy plus satisfying safety in the diagnosis of brainstem lesions. The diagnostic yield, morbidity, and mortality mildly vary based on the diversity of assistant techniques and subject populations.
Subject(s)
Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Brain Stem Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Stem Neoplasms/mortality , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Stereotaxic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Biopsy/methods , Brain Stem/pathology , Child , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the upgrade rate of calcified lobular neoplasia (LN) versus incidental noncalcified classic LN found on core needle biopsy performed for the evaluation of suspicious calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 390 consecutive image-guided breast core needle biopsies with microcalcifications as the target that were performed between December 2009 and July 2017. In 81 of the 390 core biopsies, the highest-risk lesion was LN that then underwent either excision or imaging follow-up. Core biopsy results were compared with excision and imaging follow-up findings. An upgrade of LN was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma. RESULTS. Of 81 LN diagnosed on core biopsy performed for calcifications, 16 had calcifications within the LN. Fifteen of these 16 cases underwent surgical excision, and three (3/15, 20.0%) were upgraded on excision. Of the 64 core biopsies showing incidental noncalcified LN with benign concordant entities containing calcifications, 42 underwent surgical excision, and one LN (1/42, 2.4%) was upgraded. Twenty-three total lesions (one calcified LN and 22 noncalcified LN) were followed with imaging rather than excision. No cancers were detected among the follow-up group. One case was deemed to have discordant findings on radiologic-pathologic review and was sent for excision, which showed invasive cancer with tubulolobular and lobular features. CONCLUSION. Women undergoing stereotactic core needle biopsy for calcifications revealing noncalcified incidental classic LN and a benign concordant entity that could explain the presence of the target calcifications have a low risk of upgrade and may be followed with imaging. Surgical excision should be offered to women who have LN with calcifications.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Mammography/methods , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
A 70-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department reporting the acute onset of non-fluent aphasia, hyposthenia, and hemi-anesthesia of the right body. Brain computerized tomography revealed a subcortical hypodense lesion in the middle cerebral artery territory. Neck ultrasounds of internal and external carotid arteries and of the vertebral arteries showed a focal moderate stenosis of the left internal carotid artery due to a soft atheromasic plaque. These findings that were initially consistent with a diagnosis of an ischemic stroke were not confirmed by magnetic resonance (MR). The latter showed an hyperintense lesion on FLAIR and T2-weighted sequences located in the left centrum semiovale, corona radiata, and thalamus, with a well-defined regular rim and a mild compressive effect on the lateral ventricle, with diffusivity restriction but without ADC reduction and with a punctate and serpiginous gadolinium enhancement on T1 sequences (Figure 1). Within the first day of observation, the patient started complaining progressive mental deterioration, in absence of any other possible causes, and a total body CT scan excluded any other organ involvement. Patient was then referred to the neurosurgeon in order to perform a brain biopsy. The neuropathology was compatible with the diagnosis of cerebral lymphomatoid granulomatosis (LG) (Figure 1).
Subject(s)
Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis , Stroke , Aged , Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Humans , Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis/complications , Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/etiologyABSTRACT
Stereotactic biopsy is used for sampling of suspicious non-palpable lesions identified on mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis which are not visible on ultrasound. Stereotactic biopsy is preferable to surgical excision biopsy and helps avoid surgery for benign lesions. Providing tissue diagnosis in patients with early breast cancer may help in formulating a management strategy. Stereotactic biopsy can be carried out using either a dedicated prone table with the patient lying prone or an upright mammographic add-on system with the patient in a sitting or lateral decubitus position. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of both these systems, the indications, contraindications and the complications inherent with this technique. The important pitfalls and their management as well as ways to ensure quality assurance have also been elaborated upon. Data regarding uptake of stereotactic biopsy in other parts of the world have been discussed using evidence from existing registries and databases and attempts made to quantify the need of the technique in the Indian set-up. In the absence of a national breast screening programme and limited resources in India, a hub and spoke model has been proposed as a viable model for healthcare providers for providing stereotactic biopsy.