ABSTRACT
Follicular helper T (TFH) cells are implicated in type 1 diabetes (T1D), and their development has been linked to CD28 costimulation. We tested whether TFH cells were decreased by costimulation blockade using the CTLA-4-immunoglobulin (Ig) fusion protein (abatacept) in a mouse model of diabetes and in individuals with new-onset T1D. Unbiased bioinformatics analysis identified that inducible costimulatory molecule (ICOS)+ TFH cells and other ICOS+ populations, including peripheral helper T cells, were highly sensitive to costimulation blockade. We used pretreatment TFH profiles to derive a model that could predict clinical response to abatacept in individuals with T1D. Using two independent approaches, we demonstrated that higher frequencies of ICOS+ TFH cells at baseline were associated with a poor clinical response following abatacept administration. Therefore, TFH analysis may represent a new stratification tool, permitting the identification of individuals most likely to benefit from costimulation blockade.
Subject(s)
Abatacept/therapeutic use , CD28 Antigens/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Germinal Center/immunology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , Abatacept/pharmacology , Animals , Biomarkers, Pharmacological , CD28 Antigens/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Computational Biology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Inducible T-Cell Co-Stimulator Protein/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Knockout , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint therapies (ICT) improve overall survival of patients with cancer but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as myocarditis. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA-4 Ig), an inhibitor of T cell costimulation through CD28, reverses irAEs in animal models. However, concerns exist about potentially compromising antitumor response of ICT. In mouse tumor models, we administered CTLA-4 Ig 1) concomitantly with ICT or 2) after ICT completion. Concomitant treatment reduced antitumor efficacy, while post-ICT administration improved efficacy without affecting frequency and function of CD8 T cells. The improved response was independent of the ICT used, whether CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade. The frequency of Tregs was significantly decreased with CTLA-4 Ig. The resulting increased CD8/Treg ratio potentially underlies the enhanced efficacy of ICT followed by CTLA-4 Ig. This paradoxical mechanism shows that a CTLA-4 Ig regimen shown to reduce irAE severity does not compromise antitumor efficacy.
Subject(s)
CTLA-4 Antigen , Immunotherapy , Animals , Mice , Immunotherapy/methods , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CTLA-4 Antigen/immunology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Abatacept/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunologyABSTRACT
Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic transplant remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Abatacept is a selective costimulation modulator, used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, and was recently the first drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of abatacept in steroid-refractory cGVHD. The overall response rate was 58%, seen in 21 out of 36 patients, with all responders achieving a partial response. Abatacept was well tolerated with few serious infectious complications. Immune correlative studies showed a decrease in interleukin -1α (IL-1α), IL-21, and tumor necrosis factor α as well as decreased programmed cell death protein 1 expression by CD4+ T cells in all patients after treatment with abatacept, demonstrating the effect of this drug on the immune microenvironment. The results demonstrate that abatacept is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cGVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01954979.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Steroids/therapeutic use , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
Ligation of the CD28 receptor on T cells provides a critical second signal alongside T cell receptor (TCR) ligation for naive T cell activation. Here, we discuss the expression, structure, and biochemistry of CD28 and its ligands. CD28 signals play a key role in many T cell processes, including cytoskeletal remodeling, production of cytokines, survival, and differentiation. CD28 ligation leads to unique epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-translational changes in T cells that cannot be recapitulated by TCR ligation alone. We discuss the function of CD28 and its ligands in both effector and regulatory T cells. CD28 is critical for regulatory T cell survival and the maintenance of immune homeostasis. We outline the roles that CD28 and its family members play in human disease and we review the clinical efficacy of drugs that block CD28 ligands. Despite the centrality of CD28 and its family members and ligands to immune function, many aspects of CD28 biology remain unclear. Translation of a basic understanding of CD28 function into immunomodulatory therapeutics has been uneven, with both successes and failures. Such real-world results might stem from multiple factors, including complex receptor-ligand interactions among CD28 family members, differences between the mouse and human CD28 families, and cell-type specific roles of CD28 family members.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , CD28 Antigens/metabolism , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Immunotherapy/methods , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Animals , Autoimmune Diseases/genetics , Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , CD28 Antigens/genetics , CD28 Antigens/immunology , Homeostasis , Humans , Immunotherapy/trends , Lymphocyte Activation , Mice , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Receptor Cross-Talk , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Rech J, Tascilar K, Hagen M, et al. Abatacept inhibits inflammation and onset of rheumatoid arthritis in individuals at high risk (ARIAA): a randomised, international, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2024;403:850-859. 38364841.
Subject(s)
Abatacept , Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Inflammation , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Solid organ transplant donor-recipient eplet mismatch has been correlated with donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation, antibody-mediated rejection, and overall rejection rates. However, studies have been predominantly in patients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimens and have not fully explored differences in ethnically and racially diverse populations. Evidence indicates that patients on belatacept have lower rates of DSA formation, suggesting mediation of the immunogenicity of mismatched human leukocyte antigen polymorphisms. We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of class II eplet disparity in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients treated using belatacept with tacrolimus induction (Bela/TacTL) or tacrolimus regimens between 2016 and 2019. Bela/TacTL (n = 294) and tacrolimus (n = 294) cohorts were propensity score-matched with standardized difference <0.15. Single-molecule eplet risk level was associated with immune event rates for both groups. In Cox regression analysis stratified by eplet risk level, Bela/TacTL immunosuppression was associated with a decreased rate of DSA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.4), antibody-mediated rejection (HR = 0.2), and rejection (HR = 0.45). In the low-risk group, cumulative graft failure was lower for patients on Bela/TacTL (P < .02). Analysis of eplet mismatch burden may be a useful adjunct in identifying high-risk populations with increased immunosuppression requirements and should encourage the design of allocation rules to incentivize lower-risk pairings without negatively impacting equity in access.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Tacrolimus , Humans , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Antibodies , Histocompatibility Testing , Graft SurvivalABSTRACT
Though belatacept is administered with a weight-based dosing schema, there has been higher clearance reported in obese patients. Therefore, we evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI) and transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients who were randomized to cyclosporine- or belatacept-based immunosuppression in the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT randomized clinical trials. A total of 666 and 543 patients underwent randomization and transplantation in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, respectively, of which 1056 had complete data and were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped categorically according to BMI: <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30 kg/m2. BMI did influence both the incidence and severity of acute rejection. Obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 in the low intensity belatacept group experienced significantly more rejection at 12 months than did patients with BMI <25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. In both the moderate intensity belatacept and low intensity belatacept groups, obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 experienced significantly more severe acute rejection than did patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2. These results suggest that obese kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk for acute rejection when under belatacept-based immunosuppression when compared to nonobese patients.
Subject(s)
Abatacept , Body Mass Index , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Obesity , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Obesity/complications , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Incidence , Graft Survival/drug effects , Risk Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Prognosis , Adult , Kidney Function Tests , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses updates in the prediction and prevention of future rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RECENT FINDINGS: In individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms and elevated antibodies to citrullinated proteins (ACPA) without clinical inflammatory arthritis (IA), a 'simple' score has a positive predictive value (PPV) of â¼28% for clinical IA/RA within 1âyear, and a comprehensive score (including ultrasound) has a PPV of â¼71% for clinical RA within 5âyears. Controlled clinical trials in individuals at-risk for future RA have been performed using corticosteroids, rituximab, atorvastatin, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and abatacept. Abatacept modestly reduced rates of incident clinical RA and imaging inflammation within the trials, rituximab delayed clinical IA, and methotrexate improved function, symptoms and imaging inflammation. Vitamin D with or without omega 3 fatty acids reduced incidence of autoimmune diseases, including RA. While not proven in controlled clinical trials, observational studies suggest exercise, weight loss and smoking cessation may reduce progression to clinical RA. SUMMARY: Prediction and prevention of RA is advancing although there are no currently approved interventions for prevention. Future studies should include deeper evaluation of the pathophysiology of RA development to improve prediction and identify key pathways to target in future clinical trials, as well as develop infrastructure to support prevention-related research.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Methotrexate , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evaluate the benefit of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([18F] FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the therapeutic assessment of Abatacept (ABA) as first-line therapy in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients. METHODS: This was an ancillary study of ALORS trial (Abatacept in earLy Onset polymyalgia Rheumatica Study) assessing the ability of ABA versus placebo to achieve low disease activity (C-Reactive Protein PMR activity score (CRP PMR-AS) ≤ to 10) without glucocorticoid (GC) at week 12 in patients with early-onset PMR. The patients underwent [18F] FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Responses to treatments were evaluated according to CRP PMR-AS, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) PMR-AS, Clin PMR-AS, and CRP-Imputed (Imput-CRP) PMR-AS. Quantitative score by maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and combined qualitative scores according to liver uptake (Leuven, Leuven/Groningen, and Besançon Scores) were used for assessment of [18F] FDG uptake in regions of interest (ROI) usually affected in PMR. Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the clinical, biological, and [18F] FDG uptake variation difference in ABA and placebo groups between W0 and W12. Subgroup analysis by GC rescue was performed. RESULTS: At W12, there was no significant difference according to SUVmax between the ABA and the placebo groups in all ROI. Subgroup analysis according to GC administration demonstrated a significant (p 0.047) decrease in SUVmax within the left sternoclavicular joint ROI in the ABA group (- 0.8) compared to the placebo group (+ 0.6) without GC rescue. Other results did not reveal any significant difference between the ABA and placebo groups. According to combined qualitative scores, there was no significant difference between ABA and placebo groups for the direct comparison analysis and subgroup analysis according to GC rescue. CONCLUSION: [18F] FDG PET/CT uptake did not decrease significantly after ABA compared to placebo in anatomical areas usually affected in PMR patients. These results are correlated with the clinical-biological therapeutic assessment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est II Ref CPP: 2018-33), and all patients gave their written informed consent before study enrollment. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03632187).
Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Sulfonamides , Humans , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnostic imaging , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Abatacept/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation when treated with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study aims to investigate the risk in this population. METHODS: From January 2004 through December 2020, 1068 RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARDs therapy and 416 patients with HBsAg-/HBcAb+ were enrolled. Factors associated with HBV reactivation were analysed. RESULTS: During 2845 person-years of follow-up, 27 of 416 (6.5%,9.5 per 1000 person-years) patients developed HBV reactivation, with a cumulative rate of HBV reactivation of 3.5% at 5 years, 6.1% at 10 years and 24.2% at 17 years. The median interval from beginning b/tsDMARDs to HBV reactivation was 85 months (range: 9-186 months). The risk of HBV reactivation varied by type of b/tsDMARD, with rituximab having the highest risk (incidence rate: 48.3 per 1000 person-years), followed by abatacept (incidence rate: 24.0 per 1000 person-years). In multivariate analysis, rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 15.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.12-60.32, p = .001), abatacept (aHR: 9.30, 1.83-47.19, p = .007), adalimumab (aHR: 3.86, 1.05-14.26, p = .04) and negative baseline HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs, <10 mIU/mL) (aHR: 3.89, 1.70-8.92, p < .001) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. CONCLUSION: HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients are susceptible to HBV reactivation during b/tsDMARD therapy. Those with negative baseline anti-HBs and those on certain b/tsDMARDs, such as rituximab, abatacept and adalimumab, have high reactivation risks. Risk stratification and management should be based on the patient's baseline anti-HBs titre and type of therapy.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Hepatitis B , Humans , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Rituximab/adverse effects , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Abatacept/pharmacology , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Hepatitis B Antibodies , Virus ActivationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Desensitization is one of the strategies to reduce antibodies and facilitate heart transplantation in highly sensitized patients. We describe our center's desensitization experience with combination of plasma cell (PC) depletion therapy (with proteasome inhibitor or daratumumab) and costimulation blockade (with belatacept). METHODS: We reviewed five highly sensitized patients who underwent desensitization therapy with plasma cell depletion and costimulation blockade. We evaluated the response to therapy by measuring the changes in cPRA, average MFI, and number of positive beads > 5000MFI. RESULTS: Five patients, mean age of 56 (37-66) years with average cPRA of 98% at 5000 MFI underwent desensitization therapy. After desensitization, mean cPRA decreased from 98% to 70% (p = .09), average number of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 59 to 37 (p = .15), and average MFI of beads > 5000 MFI decreased from 16713 to 13074 (p = .26). CONCLUSION: Combined PC depletion and CoB could be a reasonable strategy for sustained reduction in antibodies in highly sensitized patients being listed for heart transplantation.
Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation , Plasma Cells , Humans , Middle Aged , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Abatacept/pharmacology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , HLA Antigens , Isoantibodies , Proteasome Inhibitors , Adult , AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The optimal strategy for difficult-to-treat (D2T) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been identified, and the ultrasound characteristics of D2T RA have not been reported. We investigated the clinical characteristics and factors contributing to the outcome in D2T RA in a multicentre RA ultrasound observational cohort. METHOD: We reviewed 307 Japanese patients diagnosed with RA who underwent treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). We compared the differences in patient characteristics between the D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups. We examined the factors contributing to a good response [defined as b/tsDMARD continuation and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 10 at 12 months] in the D2T RA patient group. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (14%) were categorized as D2T RA and the remaining 264 (86%) as non-D2T RA at baseline. The grey-scale (GS) score, disease duration, and CDAI at the initiation of treatment were significantly higher in the D2T RA group than in the non-D2T RA group. In contrast, the power Doppler (PD) score was not significantly different between the two groups. Of the 43 D2T RA patients, 20 achieved a good response. The introduction of CTLA4-Ig (n = 5) was significantly associated with a good response in analysis based on inverse probability weighting with propensity score. GS and PD scores at baseline were not significantly associated with therapeutic response at 12 months in D2T RA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with D2T RA had high clinical and ultrasound activity and poor responses to treatment with b/tsDMARDs. CTLA4-Ig was associated with a good response at 12 months in D2T RA patients.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Cohort Studies , Ultrasonography , Ultrasonography, DopplerABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery. RESULTS: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic , Methotrexate , Psoriasis , Humans , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/immunology , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Perioperative Care/methods , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Thalidomide/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Ustekinumab/adverse effects , Immunomodulating Agents/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Abatacept/adverse effects , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for RA-ILD is not yet well defined. Reliable prognostic indicators are largely byproducts of prior ILD progression, including low or decreasing forced vital capacity and extensive or worsening fibrosis on imaging. In the absence of validated tools to predict treatment response, decisions about whether to initiate or augment treatment are instead based on clinical judgment. In general, treatment should be initiated in patients who are symptomatic, progressing, or at high risk of poor outcomes. Retrospective data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab are likely effective therapies for RA-ILD. Abatacept is also emerging as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with RA-ILD. Further, recent data demonstrate that immunosuppression may be beneficial even in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on imaging, suggesting that immunosuppression should be considered irrespective of imaging pattern. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that antifibrotic medications, such as nintedanib and likely pirfenidone, slow forced vital capacity decline in RA-ILD. Consideration can be given to antifibrotic initiation in patients progressing despite immunosuppression, particularly in patients with a UIP pattern. Future research directions include developing tools to predict which patients will remain stable from patients who will progress, discriminating patients who will respond to treatment from nonresponders, and developing algorithms for starting immunosuppression, antifibrotics, or both as first-line therapies.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Vital Capacity , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , IndolesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: LPS-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LRBA-/-) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) insufficiency (CTLA4+/-) are mechanistically overlapped diseases presenting with recurrent infections and autoimmunity. The effectiveness of different treatment regimens remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the comparative efficacy and long-term outcome of therapy with immunosuppressants, CTLA4-immunoglobulin (abatacept), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a single-country multicenter cohort of 98 patients with a 5-year median follow-up. METHODS: The 98 patients (63 LRBA-/- and 35 CTLA4+/-) were followed and evaluated at baseline and every 6 months for clinical manifestations and response to the respective therapies. RESULTS: The LRBA-/- patients exhibited a more severe disease course than did the CTLA4+/- patients, requiring more immunosuppressants, abatacept, and HSCT to control their symptoms. Among the 58 patients who received abatacept as either a primary or rescue therapy, sustained complete control was achieved in 46 (79.3%) without severe side effects. In contrast, most patients who received immunosuppressants as primary therapy (n = 61) showed either partial or no disease control (72.1%), necessitating additional immunosuppressants, abatacept, or transplantation. Patients with partial or no response to abatacept (n = 12) had longer disease activity before abatacept therapy, with higher organ involvement and poorer disease outcomes than those with a complete response. HSCT was performed in 14 LRBA-/- patients; 9 patients (64.2%) showed complete remission, and 3 (21.3%) continued to receive immunosuppressants after transplantation. HSCT and abatacept therapy gave rise to similar probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept is superior to immunosuppressants in controlling disease manifestations over the long term, especially when started early, and it may provide a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to transplantation.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Immunosuppressive Agents , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , CTLA-4 Antigen/genetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Autoimmunity , Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Data from trials demonstrated that abatacept (ABA) has a good safety and efficacy profile in treating rheumatoid arthritis. We have studied the retention rate of ABA in a real-life cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This is a monocentric, retrospective study including patients with rheumatoid arthritis classified by the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria who started treatment with ABA. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to evaluate the ABA retention rate. RESULTS: This analysis was conducted on 161 patients [male/female 21/140, median age 65 years, interquartile range (IQR) 18.7, median disease duration 169 months, IQR 144.0]. 111 patients (68.9%) received ABA subcutaneously. ABA was associated with methotrexate in 61.9% of patients and was the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in 41%. We observed a median ABA survival of 66 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 57.3-74.7], with a retention rate of 88% at 6 months and 50.9% at 5 years. Drug survival was significantly higher in patients treated with ABA subcutaneously and in male patients (p=0.039 and p=0.018, respectively). Adjusted for main confounders, female gender was the main predictor of withdrawal (hazard ratio 5.1, 95% CI 1.2-21.3). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that better survival is associated with subcutaneous administration and male gender, confirming ABA effectiveness.
Subject(s)
Abatacept , Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Drug Therapy, Combination , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the article is to investigate the associations of disease duration and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses of the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study of biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥20 years with moderate disease activity who were prescribed abatacept. Changes in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at 4, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment were analysed in patients divided according to ACPA serostatus (positive/negative), disease duration (<1/≥1 year), or both. RESULTS: SDAI scores decreased from baseline in all groups. SDAI scores tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group and disease duration <1-year group than in the ACPA-negative group and disease duration ≥1-year group, respectively. In the disease duration <1-year group, SDAI tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group than in the ACPA-negative group. Disease duration was independently associated with the change in SDAI and SDAI remission at Week 52 in multivariable regression models. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that starting abatacept within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with greater effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with RA and moderate disease activity.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Humans , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Japan , Treatment Outcome , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Biological Products/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We compared the incidence rates of hospitalized infections (HIs) between tocilizumab (TCZ) and other biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in adults aged ≥75 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used a Japanese claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) to perform a retrospective longitudinal population-based study in patients with RA who were prescribed b/tsDMARDs between 2014 and 2019. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for HIs in three age groups (<65, ≥65 and <75, and ≥75 years). RESULTS: Of 5506 patients, 2265 (41.1%) were <65 years, 1709 (31.0%) were 65-74 years, and 1532 (27.8%) were ≥75 years. Crude incidence rates (/100 person-years) of HIs were 3.99, 7.27, and 10.77, respectively. In the oldest group, aRRs (95% confidence interval) for HIs (b/tsDMARDs versus TCZ) were as follows: etanercept, 2.40 (1.24-4.61); adalimumab, 1.90 (0.75-4.83); golimumab, 1.21 (0.66-2.23); and abatacept, 0.89 (0.49-1.62). In the other age groups, the noticeable difference was a lower aRR of etanercept versus TCZ in the youngest group (0.30, 0.11-0.85). CONCLUSION: In patients with RA aged ≥75 years, b/tsDMARDs have a similar risk of HIs to tocilizumab except for etanercept.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Adult , Aged , Humans , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Biological Products/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Combined antigen-specific T cell receptor stimulation and costimulation are needed for complete T cell activation. Belatacept and abatacept are nondepleting fusion proteins blocking CD28/B7 costimulation, whereas siplizumab is a depleting antiCD2 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD2/CD58 costimulation. Herein, the effect of siplizumab combination therapy with abatacept or belatacept on T cell alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte reactions was investigated. In contrast to monotherapy, the combination of siplizumab with belatacept or abatacept induced near-complete suppression of T cell proliferation and increased the potency of siplizumab-mediated T cell inhibition. Furthermore, dual targeting of CD2 and CD28 costimulation enhanced the selective depletion of memory T cells compared with monotherapy. Although siplizumab monotherapy leads to significant regulatory T cell enrichment, high doses of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and a human IgG1 Fc fragment in the combination therapy reduced this effect. These results support the clinical evaluation of dual costimulation blockade, combining siplizumab with abatacept or belatacept, for the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection and improvement of long-term outcomes following transplantation. Ongoing investigative research will elucidate when other forms of siplizumab-based dual costimulatory blockade may be able to induce similarly strong inhibition of T cell activation although still allowing for enrichment of regulatory T cells.
Subject(s)
CD28 Antigens , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Abatacept/pharmacology , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE: FOXP3 deficiency results in severe multisystem autoimmunity in both mice and humans, driven by the absence of functional regulatory T cells. Patients typically present with early and severe autoimmune polyendocrinopathy, dermatitis, and severe inflammation of the gut, leading to villous atrophy and ultimately malabsorption, wasting, and failure to thrive. In the absence of successful treatment, FOXP3-deficient patients usually die within the first 2 years of life. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides a curative option but first requires adequate control over the inflammatory condition. Due to the rarity of the condition, no clinical trials have been conducted, with widely unstandardized therapeutic approaches. We sought to compare the efficacy of lead therapeutic candidates rapamycin, anti-CD4 antibody, and CTLA4-Ig in controlling the physiological and immunological manifestations of Foxp3 deficiency in mice. METHOD: We generated Foxp3-deficient mice and an appropriate clinical scoring system to enable direct comparison of lead therapeutic candidates rapamycin, nondepleting anti-CD4 antibody, and CTLA4-Ig. RESULTS: We found distinct immunosuppressive profiles induced by each treatment, leading to unique protective combinations over distinct clinical manifestations. CTLA4-Ig provided superior breadth of protective outcomes, including highly efficient protection during the transplantation process. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the mechanistic diversity of pathogenic pathways initiated by regulatory T cell loss and suggest CTLA4-Ig as a potentially superior therapeutic option for FOXP3-deficient patients.