ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the regenerative capacities of octacalcium phosphate collagen composite (OCP/Col) in one-wall intrabony defects in dogs. The background data discuss the present state of the field: No study has assessed the efficacy of OCP/Col for periodontal regeneration therapy despite the fact that OCP/Col has proved to be efficient for bone regeneration. METHODS: In six beagle dogs, the mandibular left third premolars were extracted 12 weeks before the experimental surgery. Standardized bone defects (5 mm in height and 4 mm in width) were simulated on the distal surface of the second premolars and mesially on the fourth premolars. The defect was filled with either OCP/Col (experimental group) or left empty (control group). Histological and histomorphometric characteristics were compared 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: No infectious or ankylotic complications were detected at any of the tested sites. The experimental group exhibited a significantly greater volume, height, and area of newly formed bone than the control group. The former also showed a greater height of the newly formed cementum than the latter, although the results were not statistically significant. The newly formed periodontal ligaments were inserted into newly formed bone and cementum in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: OCP/Col demonstrated high efficacy for bone and periodontal tissue regeneration that can be successfully applied for one-wall intrabony defects.
Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration , Calcium Phosphates , Collagen , Animals , Dogs , Calcium Phosphates/therapeutic use , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Collagen/therapeutic use , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Periodontal Ligament/pathology , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Male , Mandible/surgery , Dental Cementum/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of a novel synthetic carbonate apatite bone substitute (CO3 Ap-BS) on periodontal regeneration. BACKGROUND: The use of various synthetic bone substitutes as a monotherapy for periodontal regeneration mainly results in a reparative healing pattern. Since xenografts or allografts are not always accepted by patients for various reasons, a synthetic alternative would be desirable. METHODS: Acute-type 3-wall intrabony defects were surgically created in 4 female beagle dogs. Defects were randomly allocated and filled with CO3 Ap-BS (test) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or left empty (control). After 8 weeks, the retrieved specimens were scanned by micro-CT, and the percentages of new bone, bone substitute, and soft tissues were evaluated. Thereafter, the tissues were histologically and histometrically analyzed. RESULTS: Healing was uneventful in all animals, and defects were present without any signs of adverse events. Formation of periodontal ligament and cementum occurred to varying extent in all groups without statistically significant differences between the groups. Residues of both bone substitutes were still present and showed integration into new bone. Histometry and micro-CT revealed that the total mineralized area or volume was higher with the use of CO3 Ap-BS compared to control (66.06 ± 9.34%, 36.11 ± 6.40%; p = .014, or 69.74 ± 2.95%, 42.68 ± 8.68%; p = .014). The percentage of bone substitute surface covered by new bone was higher for CO3 Ap-BS (47.22 ± 3.96%) than for DBBM (16.69 ± 5.66, p = .114). CONCLUSIONS: CO3 Ap-BS and DBBM demonstrated similar effects on periodontal regeneration. However, away from the root surface, more new bone, total mineralized area/volume, and higher osteoconductivity were observed for the CO3 Ap-BS group compared to the DBBM group. These findings point to the potential of CO3 Ap-BS for periodontal and bone regeneration.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Bone Substitutes , Minerals , Humans , Dogs , Animals , Cattle , Female , Bone Substitutes/pharmacology , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Apatites , Bone Regeneration , Dental Cementum/pathology , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/drug therapy , Biological ProductsABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the potential benefits of minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) in teeth with intrabony defects and to explore factors associated with the outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-centre trial was conducted in 100 intrabony defects in periodontitis patients in private practice. Steps 1 and 2 periodontal therapy including MINST were provided. Clinical and radiographic data were analysed at baseline and 12 months after treatment, with the primary aim being change in radiographic defect depth at 12 months. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the 12-month follow up. The mean total radiographic defect depth reduced by 1.42 mm and the defect angle increased by 3° (both p < .05). Statistically significant improvements in probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were seen at 12 months compared to baseline (p < .001). Fifty-six defects (66.7%) achieved pocket closure (PPD ≤ 4 mm) and 49 defects (58.3%) achieved the composite outcome (PPD ≤ 4 mm and CAL gain ≥3 mm). Deeper and narrower angled defects were positively correlated with radiographic and clinical improvements, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes were seen after MINST. This study highlights the generalizability and wide applicability of this approach, further supporting its effectiveness in the treatment of intrabony defects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03741374. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03741374?cond=minimally%20invasive%20non%20surgical%20therapy&locStr=UK&country=United%20Kingdom&distance=50&rank=2.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Humans , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Periodontitis/therapy , Periodontitis/surgeryABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of flapless procedure alone or in combination with enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients re-evaluated after non-surgical therapy were randomly assigned to the test (flapless with EMD) or control group (flapless alone). Clinical measurements were recorded pre-surgery and at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and radiographic measurements were taken pre-surgery and after 12 months. RESULTS: Forty-six patients completed the study. Improvements were observed in both groups at 12 months for mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, with significant differences between test (3.9 ± 1.1 mm) and control groups (3.0 ± 1.2) (p = .017). Probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.4 mm) was also near to statistical significance (p = .051). Also, more sites achieved successful composite outcome measure (final PPD ≤ 4 mm and CAL gain ≥3 mm) for the regenerative treatment in the flapless + EMD group (82.6% vs. 52.2%; p = .028). In terms of radiographic outcomes, EMD yielded a greater defect bone fill than flapless treatment alone (3.0 ± 1.0 mm vs. 1.8 ± 1.5 mm; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The additional application of EMD during the flapless procedure for intrabony defects slightly improved clinical and radiographic outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identification number: NCT05456555.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Enamel Proteins , Humans , Male , Female , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Middle Aged , Dental Enamel Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methodsABSTRACT
AIM: To assess whether guided bone regeneration (GBR) treatment of peri-implantitis-related bony defects could improve healing compared to open flap debridement (OFD) at 36 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial, 32 individuals received OFD (control group [CG]) and 34 GBR treatment (test group [TG]). Radiographic defect fill (RDF), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) suppuration (SUP), mucosal recession (MREC) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated at 36 months. RESULTS: Fifty individuals attended a supportive peri-implant therapy program and completed the 36-month follow-up. GBR treatment resulted in an RDF of 2.13 ± 1.26 mm compared to 1.64 ± 1.54 mm following OFD (p = .18). No difference was found in PPD, BOP, SUP, REC or PROs between the groups. Successful treatment (no additional bone loss, PPD ≤ 5 mm, no BOP and no SUP) was achieved in 46.2% in TG and 20% in CG (p = .053). Treatment results obtained at 12 months were generally maintained up to 36 months. No significant changes were noticed between 12 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: At 36 months, treatment results obtained at 1 year were sustained following both GBR and OFD in patients attending supportive peri-implant therapy. GBR resulted in more RDF and higher composite treatment success rate than OFD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier [NCT02375750]).
Subject(s)
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Male , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Aged , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Debridement/methodsABSTRACT
AIM: This study aimed to assess hard and soft tissue contour changes following micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation (MCF-ARP) and natural healing (NH) in periodontally compromised molar extraction sites and to analyse the feasibility and need for bone augmentation during implant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with 70 sites were randomized into two groups at the site level (35 sites from 31 patients in the test group and 35 sites from 29 patients in the control group). Among whom, four patients contributed one tooth to the control group and one tooth to the test group. Hard tissue indicators were measured using cone beam computed tomography performed before tooth extraction and 6 months after surgery. Soft tissue contour changes were assessed using intraoral scanning performed before and immediately after surgery and also 2 weeks and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Six months after surgery, the MCF-ARP group showed less resorption in buccal bone height (p = .032) and greater augmentation in central bone height (p = .001) and ridge width (p = .009). The mean, vertical and horizontal collapse of buccal soft tissue contour in the MCF-ARP group were 0.95 mm (p = .010), 0.61 mm (p = .019) and 0.56 mm (p = .013) less than that in the NH group, respectively. There were significantly (p = .007) fewer sites in the MCF-ARP group than in the NH group (0% vs. 26.7%) for staged bone augmentation and more sites that could be treated with simple implant procedure in the MCF-ARP group than in the NH group (71.9% vs. 56.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NH, MCF-ARP reduced bone resorption in periodontally compromised molar extraction sites and maintained the buccal soft tissue contour. MCF-ARP reduces the need for complex bone augmentation procedures in implant therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR) ChiCTR2200056335. Registered on 4 February 2022, Version 1.0.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Molar , Surgical Flaps , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Female , Male , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Molar/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Periodontitis/surgery , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Process/pathology , Alveolar Process/surgery , Tooth Socket/surgery , Tooth Socket/diagnostic imaging , Wound Healing/physiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: To study the clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, with or without adjunctive systemic antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients (113 implants) with peri-implantitis were randomized into three groups (A, amoxicillin and metronidazole; B, phenoxymethylpenicillin and metronidazole; or C, placebo). Treatment included resective surgery and implant surface decontamination with adjunctive antibiotics or placebo. Primary outcomes were probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and marginal bone level (MBL) stability. Secondary outcomes were treatment success (defined as PPD ≤ 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] ≤ 1site, absence of suppuration on probing [SOP] and absence of progressive bone loss of >0.5 mm), changes in BOP/SOP, mucosal recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), bacterial levels and adverse events. Outcomes were evaluated for up to 12 months. The impact of potential prognostic indicators on treatment success was evaluated using multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients (104 implants) completed the study. All groups showed clinical and radiological improvements over time. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups for MBL stability (A = 97%, B = 89%, C = 76%), treatment success (A = 68%, B = 66%, C = 28%) and bacterial levels of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Tannerella forsythia, favouring antibiotics compared to placebo. Multiple regression identified antibiotic use as potential prognostic indicator for treatment success. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most reported adverse events in the antibiotic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive systemic antibiotics resulted in additional improvements in MBL stability. However, the potential clinical benefits of antibiotics need to be carefully balanced against the risk of adverse events and possible antibiotic resistance.
Subject(s)
Amoxicillin , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Metronidazole , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/drug therapy , Peri-Implantitis/microbiology , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Female , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/drug therapy , Periodontal Pocket/surgery , Periodontal Pocket/drug therapy , Periodontal Pocket/microbiology , Placebos , Follow-Up Studies , Periodontal Attachment Loss/surgery , Periodontal Attachment Loss/drug therapy , Gingival Recession/surgery , Gingival Recession/drug therapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Bacterial Load/drug effectsABSTRACT
Periodontal regeneration refers to procedures aimed at restitution of lost supporting tissue around the periodontally compromised tooth. Regenerative procedures very often include the use of barrier materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal graft as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients. A total of four data bases MEDLINE (by PubMed), Cochrane database, EBSCO, and Google Scholar were explored to identify the studies in English up to December 2022. An additional hand search of relevant journals was also done. A team of three independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles using the inclusion criteria. Randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal grafts in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis cases were included in the study. A total of six relevant articles were recognized for data procurement. A total of 117 patients with 68 sites with an age range between 18 years and 55 years were selected. Outcome variables examined were pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), radiographic bone defect fill (BDF), gingival recession (GR), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Data were analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. The mean differences and 95% confidence interval were used to illustrate the estimate of effect size. There is an equal effect in both groups for the PI, GI, and BOP reduction. For PD reduction, the result was in the favor of periosteal graft with open flap debridement (OFD) group. For CAL gain, radiographic BDF and GR, results also favored the periosteal graft, but no statistically significant difference was found amongst the groups. Within the limitation of the study, it seems that the autogenous periosteal graft can be used successfully along with OFD to treat intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Chronic Periodontitis , Gingival Recession , Adolescent , Humans , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Chronic Periodontitis/surgery , Gingival Recession/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Adult , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a self-retaining block-type bone substitute (srBB) on the dimensional stability of the horizontal ridge width at the coronal level in a buccal dehiscence model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four box-shaped bone defects with a buccal dehiscence were surgically prepared in the partially edentulous mandible (n = 6). Experimental biomaterials were randomly assigned to each site: (1) Control group: no treatment, (2) particle-type bone substitute (PBS) group, (3) collagenated soft block bone substitute (csBB) group, and (4) self-retaining synthetic block bone (srBB) group. In all grafted groups, a collagen membrane covered the biomaterials. At 16 weeks, clinical, histological, and radiographic analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three of the six blocks in the srBB group became exposed and fell out during the first week after surgery. Therefore, the remaining three specimens were renamed RsrBB group. The RsrBB group showed an increase horizontal ridge compared to the pristine bone width at 2-4 mm below the CEJ, while the other groups showed resorption (augmented width at 2 mm below: 4.2, 42.4, 36.2, and 110.1% in the control, PBS, csBB, and RsrBB groups, respectively). The mineralized bone area was largest in the RsrBB group (4.74, 3.44, 5.67, and 7.77 mm2 in the control, PBS, csBB, and RsrBB groups, respectively.). CONCLUSIONS: The srBB group demonstrated the highest volume stability at the coronal level. These findings would potentially suggest that self-retaining block bone substitute might be a good candidate for alveolar ridge preservation.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Bone Substitutes , Humans , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Collagen , Tooth Extraction , Tooth Socket/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study bone healing of two-wall bone defects after alveolar ridge preservation using mineralized dentin matrix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After distal roots extraction of second and fourth premolars (P2, P4) on one lateral mandible in 12 beagles, two-wall bone defects (5 × 5 × 5 mm) were surgically created distally to the remaining mesial roots of P2 and P4. A total of 24 sites were randomly allocated to three groups (implant material- time of execution): mineralized dentin matrix (MDM)-3 m (MDM + collagen membrane; 3 months), MDM-6 m (MDM particles + collagen membrane; 6 months), and C-6 m (collagen membrane only; 6 months). Clinical, radiographic, digital, and histological examinations were performed 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The bone healing in MDM groups were better compared to Control group (volume of bone regenerated in total: 25.12 mm3 vs. 13.30 mm3, p = .046; trabecular volume/total volume: 58.84% vs. 39.18%, p = .001; new bone formation rate: 44.13% vs. 31.88%, p = .047). Vertically, the radiological bone level of bone defect in MDM-6 m group was higher than that in C-6 m group (vertical height of bone defect: 1.55 mm vs. 2.74 mm, p = .018). Horizontally, no significant differences in buccolingual bone width were found between MDM and C groups at any time or at any level below the alveolar ridge. The percentages of remaining MDM were <1% in both MDM-3 m and MDM-6 m groups. CONCLUSIONS: MDM improved bone healing of two-wall bone defects and might be considered as a socket fill material used following tooth extraction.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Dogs , Animals , Tooth Socket/surgery , Tooth Socket/pathology , Alveolar Process/surgery , Alveolar Process/pathology , Collagen , Tooth Extraction , Dentin , Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To introduce a modified guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique using intact periosteum and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) for peri-implant augmentation and compare the clinical outcomes with those of conventional GBR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received peri-implant augmentation in posterior sites between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed in this study. Group A was treated with a modified GBR technique, and Group B was treated with conventional GBR. For group comparison, propensity score matching was performed with a sensitivity analysis. The implant survival rate, dimensional changes in hard tissue, marginal bone loss (MBL), and peri-implant parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 114 implants from 98 patients were included. The implant survival rates were 95.74% in Group A and 95.00% in Group B during the follow-up period. At 6 months, the median horizontal thickness was recorded at 0.87 mm (IQ1-IQ3 = 0.00-1.75 mm) in Group A, exhibiting a relatively lower value compared to the corresponding measurement of 0.98 mm (IQ1-IQ3 = 0.00-1.89 mm) in Group B (p = .937). Vertical height displayed no statistically significant intergroup difference between the two groups (p = .758). The mean follow-up period was 25.83 ± 12.93 months after loading in Group A and 27.47 ± 21.29 months in Group B (p = .761). MBL and peri-implant parameters were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the modified GBR technique using intact periosteum and DBBM grafting might be a viable alternative to correct bone defects around implants in molar and premolar sites.
Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Adult , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Periosteum/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Dental ImplantsABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of non-reconstructive surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients (267 implants) were surgically treated for peri-implantitis and followed for an average of 7.0 (SD: 3.6) years. The primary outcome was implant loss. Additional bone loss and surgical retreatment were secondary outcomes. Patient/implant characteristics, as well as clinical and radiographic parameters collected prior to initial surgery, were evaluated as potential predictors of implant loss. Flexible parametric survival models using restricted cubic spline functions were used; 5- and 10-year predicted rates of implant loss were calculated according to different scenarios. RESULTS: Fifty-three implants (19.9%) in 35 patients (23.5%) were lost during the observation period. Implant loss occurred after a mean period of 4.4 (SD: 3.0) years and was predicted by implant surface characteristics (modified surface; HR 4.5), implant length (HR 0.8 by mm), suppuration at baseline (HR 2.7) and disease severity (baseline bone loss: HR 1.2 by mm). Estimates of 5- and 10-year implant loss ranged from 1% (best prognostic scenario; initial bone loss <40% of implant length, turned implant surface and absence of suppuration on probing (SoP)) to 63% (worst prognostic scenario; initial bone loss ≥60% of implant length, modified implant surface and SoP) and from 3% to 89%, respectively. Surgical retreatment was performed at 65 implants (24.3%) in 36 patients (24.2%) after a mean time period of 4.5 (3.1) years. In all, 59.5% of implants showed additional bone loss, were surgically retreated or lost. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of disease is common following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. The strongest predictor for implant loss was implant surface characteristics. Implant length as well as suppuration and disease severity at baseline were also relevant factors.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Peri-Implantitis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Suppuration , Dental Implants/adverse effectsABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare clinical benefits of autologous platelet concentrate with other periodontal regenerative approaches in intrabony defects. An electronic and hand search of studies up to December 2022 was conducted. Randomized controlled trials with at least 6 months of follow-up were identified to compare autologous platelet concentrates with enamel matrix derivative, bone graft, guided tissue regeneration, and open-flap debridement. All approaches involved papilla preservation flap surgery. The outcomes included probing depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain, linear bone fill, and safety. A network meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. Fifty-seven studies were included in five network meta-analyses. Autologous platelets concentrate and its adjunct treatments achieved significantly greater clinical and radiographic parameters than did open-flap debridement, and had comparable or better performance than other regenerative treatments. Platelet-rich fibrin showed superiority over platelet-rich plasma in probing depth reduction at 6-month follow-up. Minimal pain and improved wound healing were observed in the treatments with autologous platelet concentrate. Meta-regression showed that deeper baseline intrabony defects resulted in larger probing depth reductions, while smoking impaired the effectiveness of regenerative surgeries. Minimal invasive flap designs led to less effect of regenerative materials. Autologous platelet concentrate is a promising biomaterial in periodontal regeneration due to its convenience, safety, and biocompatibility characteristics.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Blood Platelets , Bone Transplantation/methods , Surgical Flaps , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs) is associated with bone defects in the distal area of second molars. Different methods have been described to minimize these defects. PURPOSE: The primary objective was to assess changes in probing depth (PD) over time (up to 36 months) between test (grafted) and control (ungrafted) groups; the graft was obtained from the extracted ILTM. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Postgraduate Course in Oral Surgery of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Complutense University of Madrid. Adult patients requiring bilateral ILTM extraction with adjacent second molars were recruited, excluding pregnant/lactating women, patients in treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and patients with periodontal diseases. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The predictor variable was the graft technique. The bone defect after ILTM removal was treated with autogenous tooth graft (ATG) in the test group, leaving the control group ungrafted. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: PD on the distobuccal, distomedial, and distolingual surfaces was recorded in both groups and averaged at baseline (T0), 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 36 months (T3) postoperatively. COVARIATES: Sex, age, surgical time, ILTM situation and position between groups were assessed. ANALYSES: ANOVA repeated measures for comparisons between groups and the Friedman test for comparisons within the groups over time were applied. Statistical significance was established with a confidence interval of 95% (P < .05). RESULTS: The sample comprised 22 patients (6 males, 16 females) with a mean age of 21.68 ± 2.19 years; 44 ILTM extractions were performed. Statistically significant differences in PD average were found between groups (P < .001, 95% confidence interval) at 3 (1.63 ± 0.29), 6 (1.76 ± 0.3), and 36 months (1.74 ± 0.36). Reductions from T0 to T3 of 2.74 ± 0.28 (P < .001) and 0.54 ± 0.3 (P = .43) were observed in test and control groups, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: ATG placed on the distal surface of lower second molars and almost completely filling the extraction socket improved PD 3, 6 and 36 months after ILTM. Furthermore, no significant changes in PD were observed over time; no major complications occurred. ATG appears to be a viable alternative graft material for this procedure.
Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Female , Male , Adult , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Wound Healing/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Autografts/transplantation , Tooth Socket/surgeryABSTRACT
AIM: This study aims to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after complete versus incomplete removal of granulation tissue (GT) during modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) for management of periodontitis patients with deep pockets associated with infra-bony defects. METHODOLOGY: Ten patients with a total of 14 deep non-resolving pockets (≥ 5 mm) associated with a vertical infra-bony defect were recruited for this study. They were randomized into 2 groups; a test group with incomplete removal of GT and a control group with complete removal of GT. Clinical parameters of clinical attachment level (CAL), residual probing depth (rPD) and buccal recession (Rec.) were recorded every 3 months. Radiographic periapicals were taken at baseline, 6 and 9 months. The significance level was set to 0.05. RESULTS: None of the results showed statistical significance between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). The test group showed less CAL gain (2 ± 0.87 mm, p = 0.062), more reduction in rPD (3.1 ± 0.96 mm, p = 0.017) and more recession (0.857 ± 0.26 mm, p = 0.017) than control group CAL gain (2.4 ± 0.58 mm, p = 0.009), rPD reduction (2.9 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.001) and recession (0.5 ± 0.34 mm, p = 0.203) respectively. Control group had linear reduction in depth defect (DD) (0.68 ± 0.287, p = 0.064) compared to an increase in DD in test group (-0.59 ± 0.5, p = 0.914). CONCLUSIONS: No statistical significance were observed in healing parameters between complete removal of GT in M-MIST and incomplete (partial) removal of GT of deep pockets with infra-bony defects both clinically and radiographically. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the results.
Subject(s)
Granulation Tissue , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Female , Granulation Tissue/surgery , Granulation Tissue/pathology , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Periodontal Pocket/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to assess clinically and radiographically the usage of autogenous tooth bone graft (ATBG) combined with and without Simvastatin (SMV) around immediately placed dental implants in periodontally compromised sites. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients required a single extraction of periodontally compromised tooth were divided into three groups (13 patients each). Group I received immediate implant placement (IIP) without grafting. Group II received IIP with ATBG filling the gap around IIP. Group III received SMV gel mixed with ATBG around IIP. Radiographic changes were reported at the baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery. RESULTS: All implants achieved the success criteria with no complications. At 6- and 12-months post-surgery, group III showed a statistically lower mean ridge width loss compared to Group I and Group II (P < .001). Group II revealed less reduction in the mean alveolar ridge width compared to group I (P < .001). Group III showed a statistically significantly less MBL loss than group I and group II (P < .001). All groups showed a statistically significant increase in BD gain compared to baseline (P < .001). Group III showed statistically significant high BD compared to group II (P < .001). Group II showed statistically significantly higher mean BD gain than that of group I (P < .001). CONCLUSION: SMV combined with ATBG boosts the hard tissue parameters around dental implants over ATBG alone. Clinical trial registration was on August 1, 2021 (NCT04992416). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ATBG with SMV in periodontally compromised sites could improve implant osseointegration and promote favorable changes in peri-implant tissues.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Implants , Humans , Alveolar Process/surgery , Osseointegration , Tooth Extraction , Bone Transplantation , Tooth Socket/surgery , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled trial compared the outcomes of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF)-2 plus carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) granules with rhFGF-2 alone in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Stage III Grade B/C periodontitis who had completed initial periodontal therapy and had intrabony defects with a depth of ≥ 3 mm were included. Defects were treated solely with rhFGF-2 (control) or rhFGF-2 plus CO3Ap (test). Periodontal parameters and a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) were assessed at baseline, at 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the change in clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline to 12 months postoperatively. Using the Friedman test with Dunn's post-test, intragroup data were compared over time, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess intergroup data at each time point. RESULTS: Forty-eight sites in 38 patients were subjected to analysis. At 12 months postoperatively, CAL in both groups showed a significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.001). CAL gain was 3.4 ± 1.3 mm in the test group and 3.2 ± 1.2 mm in the control group, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.567). Radiographic bone fill in the test group (67.2%) was significantly greater than in the control group (32.4%) (p < 0.001). PROM scores showed no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 12 months, the outcomes including CAL gain and PROM showed no significant differences between groups, although the combination treatment enhanced radiographic bone fill. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of rhFGF-2 (with/without CO3Ap) could lead to significant improvement in clinical parameters in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. The benefit of adding CO3Ap to rhFGF-2 therapy needs further evaluation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) : UMIN000040783.
Subject(s)
Apatites , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 , Recombinant Proteins , Humans , Male , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Adult , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Periodontitis/therapy , Periodontal Index , AgedABSTRACT
One of the most promising approaches to correct periodontal bone defects and achieve periodontal regeneration is platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the regeneration of periodontal bone defects using PRF compared to other regenerative treatments. The data search and retrieval process followed the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was performed, selecting exclusively randomized clinical trials where the following were measured: probing depth reduction (PD), clinical attachment level gain (CAL), and radiographic bone fill (RBF). Out of 284 selected articles, 32 were chosen based on inclusion criteria. The use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) + open flap debridement (OFD), PRF + metformin, PRF + platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and PRF + OFD/bone graft (BG) significantly reduced PD and improved CAL and RBF. However, the combination of PRF + BG, PRF + metformin, and PRF + STATINS reduced CAL. The intervention of PRF combined with different treatments such as metformin, OFD, PRP, BG, and STATINS has a significant impact on improving PD and CAL. The use of PRF significantly improved the regeneration of periodontal bone defects compared to other treatments.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Humans , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Bone Loss/therapy , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Network Meta-AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prematurity resulted from pathological migration of periodontally involved teeth with the loss of vertical stopping points between teeth, which can lead to teeth over eruption with dimensional changes favoring occlusal discrepancies. Therefore, evaluating and comparing the effect of guided tissue regeneration followed by orthodontic intrusion as opposed to orthodontic intrusion tracked by guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of an over-erupted tooth with angular bone loss. METHODS: Twenty teeth in ten cases were selected with at least two teeth with vertical over-eruption and angular bone loss with the presence of their opposing. In group one, ten teeth over-erupted were treated by guided tissue regeneration followed by orthodontic intrusion, whereas, in group two, ten teeth over-erupted were treated by orthodontic intrusion followed by guided tissue regeneration. They were evaluated clinically for pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and tooth mobility. Radiographical evaluation assessed by cone beam computed tomography. RESULTS: Clinically, there existed a statistically significant difference (P value ≤ 0.05) in favor of group one at six months post and in favor of group two at one year from re-evaluation regarding pocket depth and tooth mobility. Radiographically, in group one, there was a statistically significant improvement (P value ≤ 0.05) at six months post-guided tissue regeneration or orthodontic intrusion regarding defect depth and dimensional changes of the defect area, with a statistically significant difference (P value ≤ 0.05) in favor of group two at one year from re-evaluation phase regarding defect depth and defect area dimensional changes. CONCLUSION: There was a short-term improvement in group one, which deteriorated over a long period compared with group two, so it is preferable to start orthodontic intrusion before guided tissue regeneration.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Tooth Mobility , Humans , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Tooth Mobility/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The distal aspect of the second molar (d-M2) often exhibits infrabony defects due to the adjacent third molar. Although the defects can be treated by guided tissue regeneration (GTR) after removing the third molar, the optimal timing remains uncertain following third molar removal in clinical decision-making. This study aimed to compare delayed and immediate GTR treatments to assist in clinical decision-making. METHODS: D-M2 infrabony defects with a minimum 1-year follow-up were collected and divided into three groups: Immediate GTR group, which underwent third molar extraction and received GTR simultaneously; Delayed GTR group, which underwent delayed GTR at least 3 months after third molar extraction; and Control group, which underwent only scaling and root planing during third molar extraction. The clinical and radiographic parameters related to the infrabony defect before GTR and post-surgery were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Dunn's test or the Bonferroni test for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 109 d-M2 infrabony defects were assessed. No significant differences were found between the two GTR groups, although both of them showed significant reductions in infrabony defect depth: the immediate GTR group (2.77 ± 1.97 mm vs. 0.68 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001) and the delayed GTR group (2.98 ± 1.08 mm vs. 0.68 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: GTR can effectively improve d-M2 infrabony defects when the third molar is removed, whether simultaneously or delayed. Patients may experience less discomfort with immediate GTR treatment as it requires only one surgery.