Long-term outcomes of edaravone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in South Korea: 72-week observational study.

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a lethal neurodegenerative disease characterized by the gradual loss of upper and lower motor neurons that leads to progressive muscle atrophy and weakness. Edaravone, a free-radical scavenger, was approved as an ALS treatment in 2015 in South Korea. METHODS: This study investigated the long-term effects and safety of edaravone by reviewing the medical records of 16 Korean patients with ALS who received extended edaravone between 2015 and 2021 in a single tertiary ALS center. RESULTS: Among sixteen patients, eleven patients underwent extended edaravone therapy for more than 18 cycles (72 weeks). The mean monthly changes in the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) were - 0.96 ± 0.83 (0-24 weeks), - 0.70 ± 0.76 (24-48 weeks), - 1.18 ± 1.67 (48-72 weeks), and - 0.81 ± 0.60 (0-72 weeks). The mean decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) was 17.4 ± 24.1. The changes were significant in both ALSFRS-R (p < 0.001) and FVC (p = 0.048); however, the mean change in compound muscle action potential of phrenic nerves was not. Patients experienced only minor adverse events, which were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study verifies previous reported outcomes of edaravone in 16 Korean ALS patients, indicating a modest effect with a favorable safety profile.

Preclinical safety assessment of antipyrine combined with lidocaine hydrochloride as ear drops.

This study was designed to assess the preclinical toxicity of antipyrine combined with lidocaine hydrochloride ear drops (ALED) and support the clinical trials of ALED in clinical settings in China. All the experiments including acute toxicity in rodents, skin sensitization toxicity in guinea pigs, skin irritation toxicity in rabbits and chronic toxicity in rats were performed according to China Food and Drug Administration guidelines. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ALED administration for mice and rats was over (400 g antipyrine plus 100 g lidocaine hydrochloride)/kg and (240 g andtipyrine plus 60 g lidocaine hydrochloride)/kg, respectively. No obvious skin sensitization toxicity and skin irritation toxicity were observed. The main changes concentrated in chronic toxicity study in rats. For the chronic toxicity, rats were administrated once a day for 28 consecutive days, and a 14-day recovery period was followed. The side effects of ALED included decreased dietary intake in male rats, increased proportion of reticulocytes, decreased or even inversed granulocyte:erythrocyte ratio, fluctuated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and slightly increased relative weight of liver. Conclusively, blood system (especially erythrocyte system) and digestive system, including liver and gastrointestinal tract, might be the toxic targets of ALED.

Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke after the Treatment with Edaravone and 0.6 Mg/Kg Alteplase in Japanese Patients with Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: We investigated how diabetes mellitus (DM) affects the outcome of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), comparing with the outcomes in those who had hypertension (HT) and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This study was a sub-analysis of PROTECT4.5, which was previously performed as a large-scale, prospective observational study of edaravone with approximately 10,000 patients with AIS in Japan. The study patients treated with edaravone alone or edaravone + alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) were analyzed for their outcomes and explored for the risk factors of poor outcome, after being divided into 8 groups according to their affected complications of DM, HT, or AF in the groups treated with edaravone alone or edaravone + tPA. RESULTS: Among patients treated with edaravone alone and edaravone + tPA, the mean reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale from baseline to 3 months after the onset was 2.0 and 4.4 in DM groups, respectively. The reduction was smaller in these groups compared with other groups (3.3-4.3 and 6.0-7.7, respectively). The logistic regression model revealed that DM was an independent risk factor for highly unfavorable outcome of modified Rankin Scale score 3-6 at 3 months after the onset, among both patients treated with edaravone alone and those treated with edaravone + tPA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.42-3.50 and OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.33-3.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: DM is suggested to adversely affect the outcome of AIS in Japanese patients.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of MCI-186 in patients with acute ischemic stroke: new formulation and dosing regimen.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MCI-186 (edaravone) is a free radical scavenger approved in Japan since 2001 for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 h from the onset of symptoms. It was recommended by the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004. Our aim was to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a new formulation and dose regimen (intravenous bolus plus infusion) of MCI-186 suitable for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Europe because the Japanese treatment protocol includes twice-a-day intravenous infusion of MCI-186 for a maximum of 14 days. Such a treatment protocol is not very practical in Europe, where hospital stay is much shorter in acute hospitals. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial we studied two dosing regimens, each in a cohort of 18 patients. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio in both cohorts to receive MCI-186 or placebo. Review of safety and plasma concentration data from the first cohort (loading dose 0.08 mg/kg + 0.2 mg/kg/h infusion) preceded the second cohort (loading dose 0.16 mg/kg + 0.4 mg/kg/h infusion). Safety parameters included adverse events, severe adverse events, physical examinations, local reactions at infusion site, ECG, clinical chemistry and hematology, modified Total Neuropathy Score and CT scans. RESULTS: Mean age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission of patients in cohorts 1 and 2 and the placebo group were 64, 63, and 69 years and 5, 5, and 6, respectively. The number of treatment emergent adverse events that occurred was 109, most of which were transient, mild or moderate. Both doses of the new formulation and dosing regimen were well tolerated. After the initiation of the infusion, plasma concentrations of MCI-186 reached or exceeded prespecified target levels within 24 h in both MCI-186 cohorts, which were in the putative therapeutic range in humans. Geometric mean values of MCI-186 plasma concentration at the end of the infusion in cohorts 1 and 2 were 391 and 1,595 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The primary objective of the present study, safety and tolerability of the new formulation and dosing regimen, was achieved. The new formula and both dosing regimens were well tolerated and achieved intended plasma concentrations suitable for larger safety studies before pivotal trials.

Acute kidney injury and edaravone in acute ischemic stroke: the Fukuoka Stroke Registry.

BACKGROUND: A free radical scavenger, edaravone, which has been used for the treatment of ischemic stroke, was reported to cause acute kidney injury (AKI) as a fatal adverse event. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether edaravone is associated with AKI in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: From the Fukuoka Stroke Registry database, 5689 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who were hospitalized within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms were included in this study. A logistic regression analysis for the Fukuoka Stroke Registry cohort was done to identify the predictors for AKI. A propensity score-matched nested case-control study was also performed to elucidate any association between AKI and edaravone. RESULTS: Acute kidney injury occurred in 128 of 5689 patients (2.2%) with acute ischemic stroke. A multivariate analysis revealed that the stroke subtype, the basal serum creatinine level, and the presence of infectious complications on admission were each predictors of developing AKI. In contrast, a free radical scavenger, edaravone, reduced the risk of developing AKI (multivariate-adjusted odds ratio [OR] .45, 95% confidence interval [CI] .30-.67). Propensity score-matched case-control study confirmed that edaravone use was negatively associated with AKI (propensity score-adjusted OR .46, 95% CI .29-.74). CONCLUSIONS: Although AKI has a significant impact on the clinical outcome of hospital inpatients, edaravone has a protective effect against the development of AKI in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

New treatment of free-radical scavenger in adrenoleukodystrophy.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is an X-linked disorder and characterized by the accumulation of saturated very long-chain fatty acids. Treatment is still unsatisfactory. Our objective is to report on the effect of the free-radical scavenger, edaravone, in a patient with ALD. CASE SUMMARY: The patient was given edaravone intravenously twice. D-ROM in cerebral spinal fluid decreased dramatically, and a shortening of neuronal transmission time as estimated on somatosensory evoked potential was observed. After terminating the treatment, his symptoms progressively reappeared. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the use of edaravone in ALD. The drug is apparently effective in improving symptoms of ALD and should be evaluated more formally.

Effect of edaravone on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke and chronic kidney disease.

The oxygen free radical scavenger edaravone is used in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Japan, but adverse reactions, especially decreased renal function, have raised concerns. To examine whether a patient's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission can predict renal function deterioration after edaravone treatment, we retrospectively evaluated the effect of edaravone on eGFR in Japanese patients with acute ischemic stroke and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The baseline eGFR in the edaravone-treated group (73.5±20.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n=408) at admission was significantly (P < .05) higher than that in the non-edaravone-treated group (51.9±25.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n=41). The change in eGFR after treatment was categorized into 3 grades: nonexacerbation (≤10%), 10%-30% exacerbation, and >30% exacerbation. There was no significant difference in exacerbation grade between the edaravone-treated and non-edaravone-treated groups (χ(2) =3.134; P=.21). We next subdivided the edaravone-treated group according to eGFR at admission as either CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n=111) and non-CKD (n=297). No significant decrease in eGFR was seen even in the edaravone-treated CKD group (most of whom were in stage 3 CKD). Decreased eGFR in stroke patients was found to be associated with stroke subtype (cardiogenic stroke), but not with infection. The present study demonstrates that eGFR at admission is not a good predictor of renal deterioration in edavarone-treated acute ischemic stroke patients, including those with stage 3 CKD.

Edaravone (radical scavenger) versus sodium ozagrel (antiplatelet agent) in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (EDO trial).

BACKGROUND: Edaravone, a free radical scavenger approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2001 for treating acute ischemic stroke, was recommended by the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004. While edaravone also has a neuroprotective profile, there is no other recognized drug that can verify its effect in clinical trials despite the need for neuroprotection. We performed a postmarketing clinical trial to provide further reliable evidence concerning edaravone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized parallel-group open-label trial of edaravone intravenously and a control drug, sodium ozagrel (ozagrel), a thromboxane A(2) synthase inhibitor, intravenously in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were initially enrolled. The rate of 'grade 0-1' on the modified Rankin Scale, as assessed at 3 months, was 57.1 and 50.3% in the edaravone and ozagrel groups, respectively. The intergroup difference was 6.8% (95% confidence interval = -3.1 to 16.7), indicating noninferiority of edaravone to ozagrel, since the lower limit of the confidence interval did not exceed -11.4%. There were no particular concerns over the safety of edaravone. CONCLUSION: This trial verified that edaravone was not inferior to ozagrel. Edaravone was at least as effective as ozagrel for the treatment of acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Edaravone: a new hope for deadly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a fatal motor neuron degenerative disorder leading to paralysis and eventual death. At present, we do not have any specific cure for this deadly disorder. Current drug therapy can only reduce morbidity in ALS patients. In 1995, riluzole was the first drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ALS. After a long gap of 22 years, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America got U.S. FDA approval for edaravone (Radicava) in May 2017 for the management of ALS. Edaravone, a novel neuroprotective agent, is indicated to slow down progression of ALS. In 2015, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma launched edaravone (Radicut) for the treatment of stroke and ALS in Japan. The U.S. FDA approved edaravone following clinical evidence from three clinical trials conducted in 368 ALS patients in Japan. Edaravone is awaiting approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe. Edaravone (60 mg) is administered by very slow intravenous infusion (60 minutes) in 28-day cycles. It has been shown to slow down the loss of physical function in ALS patients by 33% as compared to placebo. Edaravone is a strong antioxidant that prevents oxidative stress from inducing motor neuron death in ALS patients. Being a potent free radical scavenger, it has been shown to inhibit nitration of tyrosine residues in the cerebrospinal fluid and improve motor functions in mouse models of ALS. The product has been patented and the FDA has not approved any generic version of edaravone. This article discusses the preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, clinical studies and drug interactions of edaravone (Radicava) in ALS.

Discussing edaravone with the ALS patient: an ethical framework from a U.S. perspective.

The recent approval of edaravone by the United States Food and Drug Administration has generated a mix of hope tempered by reality. The costs of the drug, both monetarily and with regard to intensity of treatment, are high. The benefits, while modest, will be viewed through a very different lens by individuals depending on their goals of care. By virtue of our training and experience, physicians are ideally suited to understand and explain new treatments to our patients. As healthcare providers with a fiduciary responsibility to our patients, we must make sure they are fully informed about both the costs and benefits of non-curative therapies such as edaravone, and be prepared to discuss these in the context of their goals of care and potential impact on quality of life. Respect for our patients' autonomy is critical when discussing these issues, but we should always be guided by the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.

A case report of acute renal failure and fulminant hepatitis associated with edaravone administration in a cerebral infarction patient.

A 60-year-old male with cerebral infarction was admitted to our hospital and treated with edaravone. On day 12 of hospitalization, he suddenly lost consciousness and went into shock. Based on the laboratory findings, acute renal failure (ARF), fulminant hepatitis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were diagnosed. We immediately initiated continuous hemodiafiltration for three days and performed three sessions of plasma exchange. Following this, a gradual improvement was observed in the patient's general condition and laboratory values. On day 17 of hospitalization, intermittent hemodialysis (HD) was initiated. On day 20 of hospitalization, his renal function started to improve with an increase in urine volume. HD was successfully discontinued on the same day. Although the drug lymphocyte stimulation test for edaravone was negative, edaravone-induced fulminant hepatitis was suggested based on liver biopsy findings. We present a case of ARF, fulminant hepatitis, and DIC due to edaravone administration that was successfully treated with blood purification techniques. Since the use of edaravone treatment is expected to increase in the future, it is essential that clinicians consider the potential adverse effects of this treatment. It is suggested that blood purification is effective in inducing remission in patients with complications due to edaravone treatment.

Open-label 24-week extension study of edaravone (MCI-186) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

We aimed to explore the longer-term efficacy and safety of edaravone in an active-treatment extension period following the double-blind period of the second phase III study. Patients who met all the following criteria (scores ≥2 points on all 12 items of the revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale [ALSFRS-R], forced vital capacity ≥80%, definite or probable ALS, and disease duration ≤2 years) were randomised to 60 mg intravenous edaravone or placebo for six cycles in the double-blind period, and then offered the opportunity to proceed to this 24-week open-label extension period. One hundred and twenty-three of 137 patients continued to the extension period: 65 edaravone-edaravone (E-E group) and 58 placebo-edaravone (P-E group). Change (mean ± standard deviation; SD) in the ALSFRS-R score from baseline in the double-blind period was -4.1 ± 3.4 and -6.9 ± 5.1 in the E-E group and P-E group, respectively, while it was -8.0 ± 5.6 in the E-E group and -10.9 ± 6.9 in the P-E group over the whole 48-week period. The ALSFRS-R score changed almost linearly throughout Cycles 1-12 in the E-E group. The most commonly reported adverse events were constipation, dysphagia, and contusion. There was no sudden deterioration in the ALSFRS-R score of the E-E group. No safety concerns related to edaravone were detected.

Safety and efficacy of edaravone in well defined patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase 3 study in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), edaravone did not show a significant difference in the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score compared with placebo. Post-hoc analysis of these data revealed that patients in an early stage with definite or probable diagnosis of ALS, defined by the revised El Escorial criteria, who met a select set of inclusion criteria showed a greater magnitude of effect than did the full study population. We aimed to substantiate this post-hoc result and assess safety and efficacy of edaravone in a phase 3 trial that focused on patients with early stage ALS who met the post-hoc analysis inclusion criteria. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients aged 20-75 years with ALS of grade 1 or 2 in the Japan ALS Severity Classification, scores of at least 2 points on all 12 items of ALSFRS-R, forced vital capacity of 80% or more, definite or probable ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria, and disease duration of 2 years or less were recruited from 31 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients also had a decrease of 1-4 points in the ALSFRS-R score during a 12-week observation period before randomisation. Patients meeting all criteria were then randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 60 mg intravenous edaravone or intravenous saline placebo for 6 cycles (4 weeks per cycle with 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off) for a total treatment duration of 24 weeks. In cycle 1, the study drug or placebo was administered once per day for 14 days within a 14 day period, followed by the drug-free period. In cycle 2 and thereafter, the study drug or placebo was administered for 10 days within a 14 day period, followed by a 2 week drug-free period. Participants and investigators, including those assessing outcomes, were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in ALSFRS-R score from the baseline to 24 weeks (or at discontinuation if this was after the third cycle) after randomisation. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients who had received at least one treatment infusion, had at least one assessment post-baseline, and reached the end of cycle 3. For patients with missing values at the end of cycle 6, data were imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, provided the patients had completed at least cycle 3. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received at least one treatment infusion and had at least one assessment post-baseline. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01492686. FINDINGS: Between Nov 28, 2011, and Sept 3, 2014, we screened 213 patients, and enrolled 192 as potential participants. Of these, 137 patients completed the observation period: 69 were randomly assigned to receive edaravone, and 68 were randomly assigned to receive placebo. 68 patients taking edaravone and 66 taking placebo were included in the primary efficacy analysis. For the primary outcome, the change in ALSFRS-R score was -5·01 (SE 0·64) in the edavarone group and -7·50 (0·66) in the placebo group. The least-squares mean difference between groups was 2·49 (SE 0·76, 95% CI 0·99-3·98; p=0·0013) in favour of edaravone. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 58 (84%) patients receiving edaravone and 57 (84%) patients receiving placebo. 11 (16%) patients taking edaravone and 16 (24%) taking placebo had serious adverse events, and one (1%) patient receiving edaravone and four (6%) patients receiving placebo had adverse events (one dysphagia in edaravone group and one dyspnoea, two respiratory disorder, and one rash in the placebo group) that led to withdrawal. INTERPRETATION: Edaravone showed efficacy in a small subset of people with ALS who met criteria identified in post-hoc analysis of a previous phase 3 study, showing a significantly smaller decline of ALSFRS-R score compared with placebo. There is no indication that edaravone might be effective in a wider population of patients with ALS who do not meet the criteria. FUNDING: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

A safety analysis of edaravone (MCI-186) during the first six cycles (24 weeks) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy from the double-blind period in three randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: There continues to be a need for new therapies to treat ALS. OBJECTIVE: Provide an overview of safety for edaravone in ALS patients during the first six cycles of treatment. METHODS: Analysis was based on three randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including AEs leading to discontinuation, serious adverse events (SAEs), and deaths. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 368 patients (184 in the edaravone group and placebo group, respectively). Of those, 94.6% of the edaravone group and 90.2% of placebo group completed six cycles of therapy. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. TEAE incidence in the edaravone group and placebo group was 87.5% and 87.0%, respectively. TEAEs ocurring at ≥2% incidence in the edaravone group compared to placebo were contusion (14.7% vs. 8.7%), gait disturbance (12.5% vs. 9.2%), headache (8.2% vs. 5.4%), eczema (6.5% vs. 2.2%), dermatitis contact (6.0% vs. 3.3%), respiratory disorder (4.3% vs. 1.1%), and glucose urine present (3.8% vs. 1.6%). There was no imbalance in TEAEs leading to discontinuation (2.2% [edaravone], and 5.4% [placebo]). SAE incidence was 17.4% in the edaravone group and 22.3% in placebo group. Treatment-emergent deaths occurred in 2.2% in the edaravone group and 1.1% in placebo group, all respiratory in nature and attributed to worsening ALS. CONCLUSION: Data collected from three double-blind assessments found that while some TEAEs were more common in the edaravone group compared to placebo, the overall incidences of SAEs, deaths, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar or less for edaravone compared to placebo.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the number of cases of anaphylaxis reported in association with different classes of drugs and compare it with other reports contained in the same database. METHODS: The data were obtained from a database containing all of the spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coming from the Italian regions of Emilia Romagna, Lombardy and the Veneto, which are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. The ADRs reported between January 1990 and December 2003 with a causality assessment of certainly, probably or possibly drug related (according to the WHO criteria) were analysed using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions already coded by the WHO preferred terms of 'anaphylactic shock' or 'anaphylactoid reaction' (this last term also included anaphylactic reaction) and those with a time of event onset that suggested an allergic reaction and involved at least two of the skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, CNS or cardiovascular systems; the non-cases were all of the other ADR reports. The frequency of the association between anaphylaxis and the suspected drug in comparison with the frequency of anaphylaxis associated to all of the other drugs was calculated using the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality. RESULTS: Our database contained 744 cases (including 307 cases of anaphylactic shock with 10 deaths) and 27 512 non-cases. The percentage of anaphylaxis cases reported in inpatients was higher than that among outpatients (59.1% vs 40.9%). This distribution is significantly different from that of the other ADR reports that mainly refer to outpatients. After intravenous drug administrations, anaphylactic shock cases were more frequent than anaphylactoid reactions or other ADRs, but more than one-third of these reactions were caused by an oral drug. Blood substitutes and radiology contrast agents had the highest RORs. Among the systemic antibacterial agents, anaphylaxis was disproportionally reported more often for penicillins, quinolones, cephalosporins and glycopeptides, but diclofenac was the only NSAID with a significant ROR. As a category, vaccines had a significantly lower ROR, thus indicating that anaphylaxis is reported proportionally less than other ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a severe ADR that may also occur with commonly used drugs. It represents 2.7% of all of the ADRs reported in an Italian spontaneous reporting database.

Edaravone for acute stroke: Meta-analyses of data from randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of edaravone for acute stroke including ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials with comprehensive searches and performed systematic reviews according to the Cochrane methods of systematical reviews. RESULTS: Edaravone can reduce the rate of death or long-term disability significantly for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (RR = 0.65; 95%CI, 0.48 to 0.89, p = 0.007). However, sensitivity analysis yielded a different result. Edaravone can also improve the short-term neurological impairment of AIS (MD = 7.09; 95%CI, 5.12 to 9.05, p < 0.00001), and ICH (MD = -4.32; 95%CI, -5.35 to -3.29, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Edaravone is beneficial in improving neurological impairment resulting from AIS and ICH. However, currently there is no enough convincing evidence that edaravone reduces death or long-term disability for AIS and ICH.

Assessment of ototoxicity of intratympanic administration of Auralgan in a chinchilla animal model.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Auralgan (benzocaine and antipyrine) is an over-the-counter otic drug commonly used for otalgia. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence about the effects of the drug on hearing function and cochlear morphology in the presence of a tympanic membrane perforation. The aim of the present study was to assess the cytotoxicity of Auralgan using cultured auditory cells (HEI-OC1) and to examine its effects on hearing function and cochlear morphology after intratympanic administration in a chinchilla model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal experiment. METHODS: Cell viability and DNA labeling assays were conducted to investigate the cytotoxic effect of the drug on cultured auditory cells (HEI-OC1). To examine the possible drug ototoxic effect in vivo, chinchillas received intratympanic injection of Auralgan in one ear, whereas the contralateral control ear received saline. Outcome measures included auditory brainstem response and postmortem cochlear morphology. RESULTS: A dose-dependent toxic effect of Auralgan was noted on cultured cells. Animal experiments showed an inflammatory reaction in the experimental ears and facial paralysis in 80% of the animals on the side receiving transtympanic injection of Auralgan (P < .05). Auditory brainstem response testing demonstrated a 30- to 50-dB hearing threshold shift across all frequencies tested (P < .05). Control ears showed no inflammation or significant threshold shift. Microscopy showed damage to the hair cells and stria vascularis with bleeding in the perilymphatic space in the experimental ears and damage to the hair cells. CONCLUSIONS: Auralgan was cytotoxic to cultured auditory cells. It promoted an inflammatory reaction and seemed to be ototoxic when given via transtympanic injection in an animal model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA

A fatality after antipyrine administration.

An 87-year-old woman died after the administration of an intravenous injection of antipyrine during the course of an investigation of the efficacy of oxerutins in venous ulceration. This is believed to be the first such fatality.

Acute and latent leukopenic reaction to antipyrine.

During the past 10 yr over 100 subjects received test doses of antipyrine in our laboratory for drug metabolism studies without any noticeable untoward effects. The present case describes an immediate allergic reaction to antipyrine and a latent leukopenic reaction 8 wk later without any drug exposure. Leukoagglutination was demonstrated in vitro following the addition of antipyrine, aminopyrine, phenylbutazone, or sulfinpyrazone to blood taken from the subject.

Reproducibility of antipyrine half-lives in elderly subjects.

Antipyrine half-life determined on three to five separate occasions over a period ranging from 3 weeks to 1 year was highly reproducible in each of 20 elderly subjects (12 women and 8 men; mean age, 83 years). The mean within-subject coefficient of variation for antipyrine half-life was 9.6%, whereas the between-subject coefficient of variation was 33.3%. These findings indicate high reproducibility of individual rates of drug metabolism in medically stable elderly subjects.