Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Mov Disord ; 39(2): 428-432, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: IPX203 is a novel oral extended-release formulation of carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) developed to address the short half-life of immediate-release CD/LD. In the phase 3 RISE-PD trial, IPX203 significantly improved "Good On" time in patients with Parkinson's disease compared with immediate-release CD/LD. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IPX203 in an open-label extension of the pivotal phase 3 study. METHODS: This 9-month extension enrolled patients who completed the randomized, double-blind trial. Key efficacy endpoints included Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Patient and Clinical Global Impression scores. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Improvements in efficacy were maintained and dosing frequency and total daily dose remained stable through the trial. A total of 52.7% of patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE, mostly mild or moderate and occurred within the first 90 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 3 open-label extension, IPX203 exhibited a favorable safety and tolerability profile and sustained efficacy of comparable magnitude to the end of the double-blind study. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Levodopa/adverse effects , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Research , Drug Combinations , Double-Blind Method
2.
Mov Disord ; 39(6): 975-982, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's disease study showed no effect of earlier versus later levodopa initiation on Parkinson's disease (PD) progression over 80 weeks. We now report the effects over 5 years. METHODS: The Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's disease study randomly assigned patients to levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 80 weeks (early start) or to placebo for 40 weeks followed by levodopa/carbidopa 300/75 mg daily for 40 weeks (delayed start). Follow-up visits were performed 3 and 5 years after baseline. We assessed the between-group differences in terms of square root transformed total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score at 3 and 5 years with linear regression. We compared the prevalence of dyskinesia, prevalence of wearing off, and the levodopa equivalent daily dose. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients completed the 5-year visit. The adjusted square root transformed total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale did not differ between treatment groups at 3 (estimated difference, 0.17; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.18) and 5 years (estimated difference, 0.24; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.07). At 5 years, 46 of 160 patients in the early-start group and 62 of 161 patients in the delayed-start group experienced dyskinesia (P = 0.06). The prevalence of wearing off and the levodopa equivalent daily dose were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a difference in disease progression or in prevalence of motor complications between patients with early PD starting treatment with a low dose of levodopa 40 weeks earlier versus 40 weeks later over the subsequent 5 years. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents , Carbidopa , Levodopa , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Levodopa/adverse effects , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Disease Progression , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
3.
Am J Ther ; 31(3): e209-e218, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For Parkinson disease (PD) patients who have been diagnosed with advanced disease that can no longer be effectively controlled with optimized oral or transdermal medications, a range of device-aided therapies (DAT) are available, comprising either deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies providing continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is the latest DAT for advanced PD (APD) that was approved in Romania in 2021. STUDY QUESTION: What is the experience to date in real-world clinical practice in Romania regarding the efficacy and tolerability of LECIG in APD? STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation of 74 APD patients treated with LECIG at 12 specialized APD centers in Romania. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Demographic data and various clinical parameters were recorded, including Mini Mental State Evaluation score or Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test score. Levodopa-equivalent daily dose and the administered doses of levodopa and other PD medications were evaluated at baseline and after starting LECIG treatment. The efficacy of LECIG in reducing daily hours of off time, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias were assessed. Any percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy system or device complications after starting LECIG treatment were noted. RESULTS: At baseline, patients were taking oral levodopa for a mean of 5.3 times per day, with a high proportion also taking concomitant add-on therapies (dopamine agonists, 86%, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, 53%; catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, 64%). LECIG treatment significantly reduced daily off time versus baseline from 5.7 h/d to 1.7 hours per day ( P < 0.01). Duration and severity of dyskinesias was also significantly reduced versus baseline, and improvements were observed in Hoehn and Yahr Scale scores. LECIG treatment also allowed a significant reduction in the use of concomitant oral medications. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that LECIG treatment is an effective DAT option in APD that can simplify the treatment regimen.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents , Carbidopa , Catechols , Drug Combinations , Gels , Levodopa , Nitriles , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Levodopa/adverse effects , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Catechols/administration & dosage , Catechols/therapeutic use , Catechols/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Nitriles/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Romania
4.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 13(4): 380-388, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176907

ABSTRACT

Levodopa/carbidopa remains the gold standard for treating Parkinson disease (PD), but chronic pulsatile administration contributes to motor complications. This Phase 1 study used a new immediate-release (IR) formulation of carbidopa/levodopa 25/100 mg that is functionally scored for easy and precise splitting to evaluate the effects on levodopa plasma variability when smaller doses are taken more frequently. These functionally scored tablets were shown to be bioequivalent to carbidopa/levodopa 25-/100-mg IR generic reference tablets. Twenty-two healthy volunteers received a whole tablet every 4 hours versus half of the tablet every 2 hours. Plasma levodopa fluctuations were significantly reduced with half-tablets dosed every 2 hours, with a 44% reduction in peaks (P < .0001). While drug exposure did not differ, parameters that underlie motor response variations, including mean peak-to-trough difference and variance, were 51% and 56% less, respectively, with more frequent dosing (both P ≤ .0024). Safety and tolerability of both regimens were similar. In conclusion, more frequent administration of half-tablets of the new functionally scored IR formulation safely provided more constant levodopa levels than whole tablets dosed less often. This tablet technology could facilitate the benefits of more physiologic dopamine replenishment in patients with PD, particularly those with reduced manual dexterity.


Subject(s)
Levodopa , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Tablets
5.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 236: 108105, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Weight loss (WL) is the most common symptom among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been reported to start several years before the diagnosis of PD. The relationship between WL and PD treatment is complex. This study aimed to characterize the impact of PD treatment on WL and find clues to establish the administration of nutrition for patients with PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with PD (mean age, 58.4 ± 10.2 years; mean Hoehn and Yahr stage, 3.2 ± 0.7) were recruited. Their treatments included deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy (n = 34), levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) therapy (n = 13), and oral medication alone (n = 35). Based on the medical records, the age of onset, disease duration, treatment options, videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale, blood test results, and weight change were collected. RESULTS: The median WL per year and rate of WL were -1.0 ± 2.8 kg and -1.9 ± 4.7 %, respectively. Most patients (93 %) were classified into normal nutrition and mild malnutrition groups by their CONUT scores. The median WL of the DBS group was significantly lower than that of the oral medication alone group (p < 0.01). The rate of WL showed a significant negative correlation with the age of onset (rho = -0.328, p = 0.003), but showed a significant positive correlation with the disease duration (rho = 0.231, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: These results highlighted WL in the early stages of PD and suggested the need for adequate monitoring for patients undergoing device-aided therapy as well as oral medicine-treated patients with greater WL.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Weight Loss , Gels/therapeutic use
6.
Mov Disord Clin Pract ; 11(2): 159-165, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) is a novel device assisted treatment option for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been available in Finland since 2020. There is paucity of scientific studies considering LECIG treatment in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: Objectives of this study were to evaluate the changes in medication, adverse events and early discontinuations of LECIG treatment in real life clinical practice. METHODS: The records of 30 consecutive patients, who received LECIG between years 2020 and 2022 in Helsinki University Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Data considering changes in medication, discontinuations, and adverse events during the first six months of LECIG treatment was collected. RESULTS: Mean levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) rose significantly between baseline before LECIG and six months with treatment (1230 mg vs. 1570 mg, P = 0.001). Three patients were discarded during nasojejunal tube test phase and seven discontinued the treatment during six-month follow-up. Most common reasons for discontinuation were difficulty in finding suitable infusion rate and neuropsychiatric problems. Safety issues encountered were similar to those reported with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment. One case of rhabdomyolysis due to severe dyskinesia during LECIG treatment was observed. Patients were satisfied with the small size of the pump system. CONCLUSIONS: LEDD seems to increase during the first months of LECIG treatment. When compared to studies on LCIG, safety profile of LECIG appears similar, but early discontinuation rate is higher than expected. However, long-term studies are lacking. Only clear advantage to LCIG appears to be the smaller LECIG pump size.


Subject(s)
Catechols , Levodopa , Nitriles , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
7.
Lancet Neurol ; 23(5): 465-476, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499015

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Conventional oral levodopa therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease can be associated with variations in plasma concentrations. Levodopa infusion strategies might provide more consistent drug delivery and fewer motor fluctuations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 (a levodopa-carbidopa solution) compared with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicentre trial at 117 academic and community neurology sites in 16 countries, including in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Eligible participants were men and women aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 in the on state) who experienced at least 2·5 h/day of off time. Participants underwent an open-label run-in phase (<12 weeks), during which time optimal regimens were established for both oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa and for 24 h/day subcutaneous ND0612 infusion (levodopa-carbidopa 60·0/7·5 mg/mL), with supplemental oral levodopa-carbidopa if needed. Participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with their optimised regimen of either subcutaneous ND0612 or oral levodopa-carbidopa, with matching oral or subcutaneous placebo given as required to maintain blinding. Randomisation was done via an interactive web response system, stratified by region, using a permuted block schedule. Participants, study partners, treating investigators, study site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (ie, time of randomisation, when all patients were receiving an optimised open-label ND0612 regimen) to end of the double-blind phase in total daily on time without troublesome dyskinesia, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006210, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2019, and April 8, 2022, 381 participants were enrolled, of whom 259 (68%) were randomly assigned, 128 (49%) to subcutaneous ND0612 and 131 (51%) to oral levodopa-carbidopa. 243 (94%) participants completed the study. Treatment with subcutaneous ND0612 provided an additional 1·72 h (95% CI 1·08 to 2·36) of on time without troublesome dyskinesia compared with oral levodopa-carbidopa (change from baseline of -0·48 h [-0·94 to -0·02] with subcutaneous ND0612 vs -2·20 h [-2·65 to -1·74] with oral levodopa-carbidopa; p<0·0001). Significant treatment differences favouring subcutaneous ND0612 were also found in the first four of nine prespecified hierarchical outcomes of daily off time (-1·40 h [95% CI -1·99 to -0·80]), Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II scores (-3·05 [-4·28 to -1·81]), Patients Global Impression of Change (odds ratio [OR] 5·31 [2·67 to 10·58]), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (OR 7·23 [3·57 to 14·64]). Hierarchical testing ended after the fourth secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported by 287 (89%) of 322 participants during open-label ND0612 optimisation, and by 103 (80%) of 128 in the ND0612 group and 97 (74%) of 131 in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase. The most common adverse events were infusion-site reactions (266 [83%] participants during open-label ND0612, and 73 [57%] in the ND0612 group vs 56 [43%] in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase), most of which were mild. Serious adverse events in four participants in the ND0612 group were related to study treatment (infusion-site cellulitis [n=2], infusion-site abscess and infusion-site ulcer [n=1]; and paraesthesia and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy [n=1]). One participant in the ND0612 group died during the double-blind phase, but the death was not related to study treatment (fall leading to traumatic brain injury). INTERPRETATION: Results of this phase 3 study showed that subcutaneous ND0612 used in combination with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa increased on time without troublesome dyskinesia and reduced off time, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. ND0612 might offer a safe and efficacious subcutaneous levodopa infusion approach to managing motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. The ongoing open-label extension phase will provide further information on the long-term efficacy and safety of treatment. FUNDING: NeuroDerm.


Subject(s)
Dyskinesias , Parkinson Disease , Male , Humans , Female , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Dyskinesias/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
10.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 69(5): 756-759, Oct. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-604213

ABSTRACT

We report a case series of dopamine dysregulation syndrome, previously known as hedonistic homeostatic dysregulation in patients with Parkinson's disease on dopamine replacement therapies, now designated as Lees' syndrome.


Relatamos uma série de casos da síndrome de desregulação dopaminérgica, previamente conhecida como desregulação homeostática hedonística em pacientes com doença de Parkinson em uso de terapia de reposição dopaminérgica, e agora definida como síndrome de Lees.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Dopamine Agents/adverse effects , Dopamine/metabolism , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/etiology , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Carbidopa/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Dopamine Agents/therapeutic use , Levodopa/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/complications , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL