ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interferon gamma (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) molecules seem to have a potential effect on angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The aim of this study was to assess a possible interplay between IFNγ and TWEAK cytokines and VEGF machinery in the different steps of colorectal carcinogenesis. METHODS: A total of 92 subjects with colonic adenoma or cancer who underwent screening colonoscopy or surgery were prospectively enrolled. Polypoid lesion tissue samples were collected and frozen. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for IFNγ, TWEAK, and VEGF-A mRNA expression was performed. Immunoassays for VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3 were also performed. Nonparametric statistics, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and logistic multiple regression analysis were used. RESULTS: IFNγ and TWEAK mRNA expression was higher in patients with T2 or more advanced colorectal cancer than in those with adenomas or T1 cancer (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). IFNγ and TWEAK mRNA expression levels directly correlated with VEGF-A mRNA expression levels (rho = 0.44, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.29, p = 0.004, respectively). On the contrary, IFNγ and TWEAK mRNA expression levels inversely correlated with VEGF-C protein levels (rho = -0.29, p = 0.04 and rho = -0.31, p = 0.03, respectively). Similarly, IFNγ and TWEAK mRNA expression levels inversely correlated with VEGFR2 protein levels (rho = -0.38, p = 0.033 and rho = -0.40, p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed that in colorectal polypoid lesions, IFNγ and TWEAK expressions are directly correlated to VEGF-A expression but inversely correlated with VEGFR2 levels, suggesting a possible feedback mechanism in the regulation of VEGF-A expression.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/blood supply , Cytokine TWEAK/genetics , Interferon-gamma/genetics , Neovascularization, Pathologic/etiology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Cytokine TWEAK/analysis , Female , Humans , Interferon-gamma/analysis , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/analysis , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/analysisSubject(s)
Cytokine TWEAK/metabolism , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Cytokine TWEAK/analysis , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable biomarkers in the literature that could be used as flare predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) through April 2015 and congress abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism were reviewed from 2010 to 2014. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and analysed selected papers in detail, using a specific questionnaire. Reports addressing the relationships between one or more defined biological test(s) and the occurrence of disease exacerbation were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: From all of the databases, 4668 records were retrieved, of which 69 studies or congress abstracts were selected for the systematic review. The performance of seven types of biomarkers performed routinely in clinical practice and nine types of novel biological markers was evaluated. Despite some encouraging results for anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, anti-C1q antibodies, B-lymphocyte stimulator and tumour necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, none of the biomarkers stood out from the others as a potential gold standard for flare prediction. The results were heterogeneous, and a lack of standardized data prevented us from identifying a powerful biomarker. CONCLUSIONS: No powerful conclusions could be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of standardized data. Efforts should be undertaken to optimize future research on potential SLE biomarkers to develop validated candidates. Thus, we propose a standardized pattern for future studies.