ABSTRACT
Postmenopausal osteoporosis arises from imbalanced osteoclast and osteoblast activity, and mounting evidence suggests a role for the osteoimmune system in bone homeostasis. Bisphosphonate (BP) is an antiresorptive agent, but its treatment failure rate can be as high as 40%. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on peripheral immune cells from carefully selected postmenopausal women: non-osteoporotic, osteoporosis improved after BP treatment, and BP-failed cases. We found an increase in myeloid cells in patients with osteoporosis (specifically, T cell receptor+ macrophages). Furthermore, lymphoid lineage cells varied significantly, notably elevated natural killer cells (NKs) in the BP-failed group. Moreover, we provide fruitful lists of biomarkers within the immune cells that exhibit condition-dependent differences. The existence of osteoporotic- and BP-failure-specific cellular information flows was revealed by cell-cell interaction analysis. These findings deepen our insight of the osteoporosis pathology enhancing comprehension of the role of immune heterogeneity in postmenopausal osteoporosis and BP treatment failure.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Osteoporosis , Humans , Female , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/genetics , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/genetics , Gene Expression ProfilingABSTRACT
Bone cancer is common and severe. Both primary (e.g., osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma) and secondary (e.g., metastatic) bone cancers lead to significant health problems and death. Currently, treatments such as chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and radiation therapy are used to treat bone cancer, but they often only shrink or slow tumor growth and do not eliminate cancer completely. The bone microenvironment contributes unique signals that influence cancer growth, immunogenicity, and metastasis. Traditional cancer therapies have limited effectiveness due to off-target effects and poor distribution on bones. As a result, therapies with improved specificity and efficacy for treating bone tumors are highly needed. One of the most promising strategies involves the targeted delivery of pharmaceutical agents to the site of bone cancer by introduction of bone-targeting moieties, such as bisphosphonates or oligopeptides. These moieties have high affinities to the bone hydroxyapatite matrix, a structure found exclusively in skeletal tissue, and can enhance the targeting ability and efficacy of anticancer drugs when combating bone tumors. This review focuses on the engineering of small molecules and proteins with bone-targeting moieties for the treatment of bone tumors.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Bone Neoplasms , Humans , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Osteosarcoma/drug therapy , Osteosarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/drug therapy , Sarcoma, Ewing/therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effectsABSTRACT
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly, often presenting comorbidities like osteoporosis and requiring, in a relevant proportion of cases, treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs). This class of drugs was shown in preclinical investigations to also possess anticancer properties. We started an in vitro study of the effects of BPs on CLL B cells activated by microenvironment-mimicking stimuli and observed that, depending on drug concentration, hormetic effects were induced on the leukemic cells. Higher doses induced cytotoxicity whereas at lower concentrations, more likely occurring in vivo, the drugs generated a protective effect from spontaneous and chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and augmented CLL B cell activation/proliferation. This CLL-activation effect promoted by the BPs was associated with markers of poor CLL prognosis and required the presence of bystander stromal cells. Functional experiments suggested that this phenomenon involves the release of soluble factors and is increased by cellular contact between stroma and CLL B cells. Since CLL patients often present comorbidities such as osteoporosis and considering the diverse outcomes in both CLL disease progression and CLL response to treatment among patients, illustrating this phenomenon holds potential significance in driving additional investigations.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Osteoporosis , Humans , Aged , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , B-Lymphocytes , Apoptosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
COVID-19 infection has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality globally, especially among older adults. Repurposed drugs have demonstrated activity in respiratory illnesses, including nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. In this retrospective longitudinal study at 4 academic medical centers, we show no benefit of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates regarding ICU admission, ventilator use, and mortality among older adults with COVID-19 infection. We specifically evaluated the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and found no difference compared to oral bisphosphonates. BACKGROUND: Widely used in osteoporosis treatment, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BP) have been associated with reduced mortality and morbidity among older adults. Based on prior studies, we hypothesized that prior treatment with N-BP might reduce intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, and death among older adults diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the PCORnet Common Data Model across 4 academic medical centers through 1 September 2021 identified individuals age >50 years with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The composite outcome included ICU admission, ventilator use, or death within 15, 30, and 180 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Use of N-BP was defined as a prescription within 3 years prior. ICU admission and ventilator use were determined using administrative codes. Death included both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events. Patients treated with N-BP were matched 1:1 by propensity score to patients without prior N-BP use. Secondary analysis compared outcomes among those prescribed zoledronic acid (ZOL) to those prescribed oral N-BPs. RESULTS: Of 76,223 COVID-19 patients identified, 1,853 were previously prescribed N-BP, among whom 559 were prescribed ZOL. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the composite outcome at 15 days (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.89-1.67), 30 days (HR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.93-1.66), or 180 days (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93-1.48), comparing those prescribed and not prescribed N-BP. Compared to those prescribed oral N-BP, there were no significant differences in outcomes among those prescribed ZOL. CONCLUSION: Among older COVID-19 patients, prior exposure to N-BP including ZOL was not associated with a reduction in ICU admission, ventilator use, or death.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , COVID-19 , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Testing , Longitudinal StudiesABSTRACT
Gorham-Stout syndrome is an aggressive, non-hereditary, and rare disease affecting bone metabolism. Its etiology and pathogenesis remain elusive. The syndrome manifests with diverse clinical symptoms, often leading to frequent misdiagnoses and presenting challenges in treatment. In this study, we report a case of cranial and maxillary osteolysis in a 47-year-old female patient with somatic mutations in the VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and VEGF-C genes and the EPHB4 gene. After treatment with bisphosphonates, this patient still had persistent resorption of the mandible, but switching to a teriparatide and denosumab combination yielded substantial improvement. This study is the first report to show that teriparatide combined with denosumab can be used to treat Gorham-Stout syndrome.
Subject(s)
Osteolysis, Essential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteolysis, Essential/diagnostic imaging , Osteolysis, Essential/drug therapy , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , SyndromeABSTRACT
Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Denosumab , Diphosphonates , Osteoporosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Denosumab/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG) and LRP5 high bone mass (LRP5-HBM) are two rare bone diseases with opposite clinical symptoms caused by loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations in LRP5. Bisphosphonates are an effective treatment for OPPG patients. LRP5-HBM has a benign course, and age-related bone loss is found in one LRP5-HBM patient. PURPOSE: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) is involved in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. The gain-of-function mutation leads to high bone mass (LRP5-HBM), while the loss-of-function mutation leads to osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG). In this study, the clinical manifestations, disease-causing mutations, treatment, and follow-up were summarized to improve the understanding of these two diseases. METHODS: Two OPPG patients and four LRP5-HBM patients were included in this study. The clinical characteristics, biochemical and radiological examinations, pathogenic mutations, and structural analysis were summarized. Furthermore, several patients were followed up to observe the treatment effect and disease progress. RESULTS: Congenital blindness, persistent bone pain, low bone mineral density (BMD), and multiple brittle fractures were the main clinical manifestations of OPPG. Complex heterozygous mutations were detected in two OPPG patients. The c.1455G > T mutation in exon 7 was first reported. During the follow-up, BMD of two patients was significantly improved after bisphosphonate treatment. On the contrary, typical clinical features of LRP5-HBM included extremely high BMD without fractures, torus palatinus and normal vision. X-ray showed diffuse osteosclerosis. Two heterozygous missense mutations were detected in four patients. In addition, age-related bone loss was found in one LRP5-HBM patient after 12-year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study deepened the understanding of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and follow-up of OPPG and LRP5-HBM; expanded the pathogenic gene spectrum of OPPG; and confirmed that bisphosphonates were effective for OPPG. Additionally, it was found that Ala242Thr mutation could not protect LRP5-HBM patients from age-related bone loss. This phenomenon deserves further study.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Density , Diphosphonates , Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5 , Mutation , Humans , Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5/genetics , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Density/genetics , Female , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Male , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/genetics , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/physiopathology , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/drug therapy , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/complications , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , ChildABSTRACT
Osteoporosis treatment following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) is associated with lower rates of periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Our study evaluated the economic viability of treatment in patients following arthroplasty and demonstrates that treatment with oral bisphosphonates can be cost-effective in preventing PPF. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis treatment following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) is associated with lower rates of periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Although cost-effective in reducing the rate of secondary fragility fracture, the economic viability of osteoporosis treatment in preventing PPF has not been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use a break-even analysis to determine whether and which current osteoporosis medications are cost-effective in preventing PPF following arthroplasty for FNFs. METHODS: Three-year average cost of osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonates, estrogen hormonal therapy, intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide), costs of PPF care, and PPF rates in patients who underwent hip arthroplasty for FNFs without osteoporosis treatment were used to perform a break-even analysis. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) related to osteoporosis treatment and sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this intervention and break-even PPF rates. RESULTS: Oral bisphosphonate therapy following arthroplasty for hip fractures would be economically justified if it prevents one out of 56 PPFs (ARR, 1.8%). Given the current cost and incidence of PPF, overall treatment can only be economically viable for PPF prophylaxis if the 3-year costs of these agents are less than $1500. CONCLUSION: The utilization of lower cost osteoporosis medications such as oral bisphosphonates and estrogen hormonal therapy as PPF prophylaxis in this patient population would be economically viable if they reduce the PPF rate by 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. For IV bisphosphonates and newer agents to be economically viable as PPF prophylaxis in the USA, their costs need to be significantly reduced.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diphosphonates , Drug Costs , Femoral Neck Fractures , Osteoporosis , Periprosthetic Fractures , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Femoral Neck Fractures/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Female , Aged , Periprosthetic Fractures/prevention & control , Periprosthetic Fractures/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Osteoporosis/economics , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/economics , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Administration, Oral , Male , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory, osteolytic bone disorder sometimes localized to a unifocal site in the jaw, causing long-term pain and reduced function. The aim of this study was to describe the patients with CNO of the jaw, focusing on treatment with zoledronic acid for pain relief. An analysis of medical records of 24 patients with CNO of the jaw, including treatment with zoledronic acid and effects on pain relief. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used to describe the population and compare treatment effects, respectively. The average treatment period was 33.4 months (median 23; Q1 11.5; Q3 42.0) with an average of 4.1 infusions (median 3; Q1 2; Q3 5) of zoledronic acid. The average pain VAS score (visual analogue scale) was significantly reduced from 7.7 (median 8; Q1 6.5; Q3 8.5) to 2.5 points (median 2; Q1 0.5; Q3 4.5) (p < 0.001). At final visit, 46% of patients reported no pain and 38% reported a reduction of pain. At least 67% of patients had at least one episode of pain recurrence, and most patients experienced the first recurrence within a year of initial treatment. Four patients (16%) had no pain relief from the treatment. In this group of patients with CNO of the jaw, there was a positive response to treatment with zoledronic acid on pain relief, averaging 5.2 points on a pain VAS score, with 84% of patients treated experiencing either a partial or a total reduction in pain after about 2.5 years.
Subject(s)
Osteomyelitis , Humans , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Bone and Bones , Pain/complications , Diphosphonates/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Childhood-onset osteoporosis is a rare but clinically significant condition. Studies have shown pathogenic variants in more than 20 different genes as causative for childhood-onset primary osteoporosis. The X-chromosomal PLS3, encoding Plastin-3, is one of the more recently identified genes. In this study, we describe five new families from four different European countries with PLS3-related skeletal fragility. The index cases were all hemizygous males presenting with long bone and vertebral body compression fractures. All patients had low lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). The age at the first clinical fracture ranged from 1.5 to 13 years old. Three of the identified PLS3 variants were stop-gain variants and two were deletions involving either a part or all exons of the gene. In four families the variant was inherited from the mother. All heterozygous women reported here had normal BMD and no bone fractures. Four patients received bisphosphonate treatment with good results, showing a lumbar spine BMD increment and vertebral body reshaping after 10 months to 2 years of treatment. Our findings expand the genetic spectrum of PLS3-related osteoporosis. Our report also shows that early treatment with bisphosphonates may influence the disease course and reduce the progression of osteoporosis, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis for prompt intervention and appropriate genetic counseling.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Osteoporosis , Spinal Fractures , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Bone Density/genetics , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/drug therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Mutation , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Spinal Fractures/genetics , Spinal Fractures/drug therapyABSTRACT
Bisphosphonates have been associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee (TJA) because of their effects on decreased periprosthetic bone loss and prosthetic migration. However, the results in the early literature are inconsistent, and the influence of bisphosphonates on associated complications and subsequent TJA remains unknown. This study investigated the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the risk of adverse outcomes after primary TJA. This matched cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to identify patients who underwent primary TJA over a 15-year period (January 2000-December 2015 inclusive). Study participants were further categorized into two groups, bisphosphonate users and nonusers, using propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of revision surgery, adverse outcomes of primary surgery and subsequent TJA were calculated using Cox regression analysis. This study analyzed data from 6485 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 20,920 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of revision hip and knee arthroplasty was significantly lower in the bisphosphonate users than in the nonusers (aHR, 0.54 and 0.53, respectively). Furthermore, the risk of a subsequent total joint arthroplasty, adverse events and all-cause mortality were also significantly reduced in the bisphosphonate users. This study, involving a large cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroplasties, revealed that bisphosphonate treatment may potentially reduce the risk of revision surgery and associated adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the use of bisphosphonates after TJA is also associated with a reduced need for subsequent arthroplasty.Research Registration Unique Identifying Number (UIN): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier-NCT05623540 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05623540 ).
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Diphosphonates , Humans , Female , Male , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Taiwan/epidemiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the impact of denosumab on (i) the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and (ii) long-term health outcomes (microvascular [neuropathy, retinopathy, nephropathy] and macrovascular [cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident] complications, and all-cause mortality) in patients with T2D, before (iii) combining results with prior studies using meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data in a large global federated database (TriNetX; Cambridge, MA) was conducted from 331 375 patients, without baseline T2D or cancer, prescribed either denosumab (treatment, n = 45 854) or bisphosphonates (control, n = 285 521), across 83 healthcare organizations. Propensity score matching (1:1) of confounders was undertaken that resulted in 45 851 in each cohort. Secondary analysis further evaluated the impact of denosumab on long-term health outcomes in patients with T2D. Additionally, we systematically searched prior literature that assessed the association between denosumab and T2D. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools. RESULTS: Denosumab (vs. bisphosphonates) was associated with a lower risk of incident T2D over 5 years (hazard ratio 0.83 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.78-0.88]). Secondary analysis showed significant risk reduction in all-cause mortality (0.79 [0.72-0.87]) and foot ulceration (0.67 [0.53-0.86]). Also, pooled results from four studies (three observational, one randomized controlled trial) following meta-analysis showed a reduced relative risk (RR [95% CI]) for incident T2D in patients prescribed denosumab (0.83 [0.79-0.87]) (I2 = 10.76%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort study to show that denosumab treatment is associated with a reduced RR of incident T2D, as well as an associated reduced RR of all-cause mortality and microvascular complications, findings that may influence guideline development in the treatment of osteoporosis, particularly in patients who are at a high risk of T2D.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Denosumab , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diphosphonates , Osteoporosis , Humans , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Denosumab/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Female , Male , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Aged , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/mortality , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Adult , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a global health issue. Bisphosphonates that are commonly used to treat osteoporosis suppress both bone resorption and subsequent bone formation. Inhibition of cathepsin K, a cysteine proteinase secreted by osteoclasts, was reported to suppress bone resorption while preserving or increasing bone formation. Analyses of the different effects of antiresorptive reagents such as bisphosphonates and cysteine proteinase inhibitors will contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying bone remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our team has developed an in vitro system in which bone remodeling can be temporally observed at the cellular level by 2-photon microscopy. We used this system in the present study to examine the effects of the cysteine proteinase inhibitor E-64 and those of zoledronic acid on bone remodeling. RESULTS: In the control group, the amount of the reduction and the increase in the matrix were correlated in each region of interest, indicating the topological and quantitative coordination of bone resorption and formation. Parameters for osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and matrix resorption/formation were also correlated. E-64 disrupted the correlation between resorption and formation by potentially inhibiting the emergence of spherical osteoblasts, which are speculated to be reversal cells in the resorption sites. CONCLUSION: These new findings help clarify coupling mechanisms and will contribute to the development of new drugs for osteoporosis.
Subject(s)
Bone Resorption , Cysteine Proteases , Osteoporosis , Humans , Cysteine Proteases/pharmacology , Cysteine Proteases/therapeutic use , Bone Resorption/drug therapy , Osteoclasts , Cathepsin K , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: To describe the real-world use of romosozumab in Japan, we conducted a chart review of > 1000 Japanese patients with osteoporosis (OP) at high risk of fracture, across multiple medical institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment-naïve and prior OP-treatment patients who received romosozumab for 12 months followed by ≥ 6 months of sequential OP treatment were included. The primary objective described the baseline demographics and clinical characteristics; secondary objectives evaluated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in all patients and effectiveness of romosozumab in a sub-group of treatment-naïve patients using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®). RESULTS: Of the 1027 patients (92.4% female), 45.0% were treatment-naïve. The mean ± SD age of treatment-naïve versus prior OP-treatment patients was 76.8 ± 8.5 and 77.1 ± 8.5 years. The most frequent prior OP treatment was bisphosphonates (45.0%). Romosozumab treatment for 12 months increased BMD at the lumbar spine in all groups; the median percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was higher in the treatment-naïve (13.4%) versus prior OP-treatment group (bisphosphonates [9.2%], teriparatide [11.3%], denosumab [DMAb, 4.5%]). DMAb, bisphosphonates, or teriparatide after romosozumab maintained the BMD gains at all skeletal sites at month 18 in treatment-naïve patients. Most treatment-naïve patients were at high risk of fracture, BMD increased consistently with romosozumab regardless of the baseline fracture risk assessed by FRAX. CONCLUSION: This large-scale, multicenter chart review provides clinically relevant insights into the profiles of patients initiating romosozumab, effectiveness of real-world romosozumab use, and sequential therapy in Japanese patients at high risk of fracture.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Fractures, Bone , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Osteoporosis , Humans , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Japan , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Fractures, Bone/drug therapy , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Fractures, Bone/chemically induced , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Lumbar Vertebrae , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Denosumab/pharmacology , Denosumab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the standard treatment for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study reviewed patients with mandibular MRONJ who underwent surgical treatment, and in particular the characteristics of non-osteolytic MRONJ with no evidence of osteolysis on CT were described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with mandibular MRONJ who underwent surgery between January 2016 and September 2022. Various clinical and imaging factors regarding treatment outcomes were investigated and analyzed. Additionally, the disease course of non-osteolytic MRONJ was examined in detail. RESULTS: This study included 55 patients (66 surgeries) with a mean age of 74.7. The primary disease was osteoporosis (24 patients) and malignancy (31 patients); the type of antiresorptive agent was bisphosphonate (BP) in 21 patients and denosumab (DMB) in 26. BP was initially administered; however, it was changed to DMB in eight patients. Preoperatively, the cumulative cure rates for all 66 surgeries were 72.8% at 1 year and 77.3% at 2 years. Cure rates were significantly lower in patients with malignancy, those without osteolysis, and those who underwent sequestrum removal or marginal mandibulectomy than those with osteoporosis, osteolysis, and segmental mandibulectomy. Non-osteolytic MRONJ was observed in eight patients, all with malignancy and receiving high-dose DMB. Only two patients were cured after the initial surgery, and most patients ultimately underwent segmental mandibulectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment yielded good treatment outcomes in most patients with mandibular MRONJ; however, the cure rate was lower in patients with malignancy who showed no osteolysis on CT images.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Neoplasms , Osteolysis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Aged , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Osteolysis/diagnostic imaging , Osteolysis/chemically induced , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Osteoporosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the protective effect of osteoporosis medications on the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 1 January, 2011 to 31 March, 2023. There was a total of 971901 patients from a hospital-based population in Taiwan. In this cohort, there was a total of 17065 osteoporosis patients with or without pathological fracture. In these patients, 7180 patients were osteoporosis medication users, and 9605 patients were non-osteoporosis medication users, after exclusion of previous RA. The risk of RA in the patients with osteoporosis medications was assessed, and stratified by sex and different medications, including bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene and teriparatide. RESULTS: Patients with osteoporosis medication use had a reduced risk of RA compared with non-osteoporosis medication users [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=0.484, 95%CI: 0.270-0.867, p<0.05), after adjusting for age, comorbidites and medications. Specifically, patients with ever use of bisphosphonates (n=2069) or denosumab (n=4510) had a reduced risk of RA (aHR=0.405, 95%CI: 0.173-0.951, p<0.05, and aHR=0.394, 95%CI: 0.192-0.809, p<0.05, respectively). Notably, patients that only used denosumab (n=2938) had a further reduced risk of RA (aHR=0.32, 95%CI: 0.12-0.83, p<0.05), particularly in female patients (aHR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.09-0.74, p<0.05). Patients taking raloxifene or teriparatide did not have a significantly reduced risk of RA. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab use reduces the risk of RA in patients with osteoporosis. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) mediated osteoclast joint damage may be involved in the pathogenesis of RA during the preclinical stage.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Denosumab , Osteoporosis , Humans , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Denosumab/adverse effects , Female , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Male , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Taiwan/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Protective Factors , Diphosphonates/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this literature review was to determine if medications used to treat osteoporosis are also effective for treating osteoarthritis (OA). RECENT FINDINGS: A total of 40 relevant articles were identified. Studies were categorized into those (1) discussing estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (2) bisphosphonates, (3) parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs, and (4) denosumab, and (5) prior review articles. A large amount of evidence suggests that estrogen and SERMs are effective at reducing OA symptoms and disease progression. Evidence suggests that bisphosphonates, the most common medications used to treat osteoporosis, can reduce OA symptoms and disease progression. In vivo studies suggest that PTH analogs may improve the cartilage destruction associated with OA; however, few human trials have examined its use for OA. Denosumab is approved to treat osteoporosis, bone metastases, and certain types of breast cancer, but little study has been done with respect to its effect on OA. The current evidence indicates that medications used to treat osteoporosis are also effective for treating OA. Estrogen, SERMs, and bisphosphonates have the most potential as OA therapies. Less is known regarding the effectiveness of PTH analogs and denosumab in OA, and more research is needed.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Denosumab , Diphosphonates , Disease Progression , Osteoarthritis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators , Humans , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Parathyroid Hormone/therapeutic use , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of maternal exposure to bisphosphonates (BPs) during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes. It aimed to disclosfe the impact of BPs on neonates and identify aspects that require further investigation. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Science Direct, LILACS, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted until August 2022, with no time restrictions. The selection criteria included studies published in English that evaluated pregnant women who were exposed to BPs. RESULTS: From an initial pool of 2169 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. These studies collectively included 106 women (108 pregnancies) who were exposed to BPs either before orduring pregnancy. A summary of the key characteristics of the selected studies and the risk of bias assessment are provided. Exposure to BPs occurs at various stages of pregnancy, with different indications for BP treatment. The most frequently reported neonatal outcomes were spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations, hypocalcemia, preterm birth, and low birth weight. CONCLUSION: Although previous reports have linked BPs before or during pregnancy with adverse neonatal outcomes, these associations should be interpreted with caution. Given the complexity of these findings, further research is necessary to provide more definitive insights to guide clinical decisions regarding the use of BPs in pregnant women.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Diphosphonates , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Infant, Newborn , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Premature BirthABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is aimed at generating a concise tool for clinicians that concentrates practical information needed for the management of oral complications of cancer patients. This CPS raises awareness to the prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant bone-modifying agents (BMA). METHODS: This CPS was developed based on a critical evaluation of the literature followed by a structured discussion of a group of leading experts, members of the Oral Care Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The information is presented in the form of succinct bullets and tables to generate a short manual about the best standard of care. RESULTS: In patients treated with adjuvant BMA, dento-alveolar surgery poses a moderate risk for MRONJ that ranges between the high risk for MRONJ in patients with metastatic breast cancer and the low risk for MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis. Existing MRONJ guidelines serve as a starting point for adjuvant BMA use. Urgent procedures should be delivered without delay using the accepted precautions to prevent MRONJ. If elective surgery is considered, the individual risk for MRONJ following surgery should be assessed according to common risk factors. CONCLUSION: Prevention of MRONJ in primary breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant BMA requires risk-benefit assessment; collaboration between the medical team, dental professional, and patient; and patient-specific tailored dental treatment planning. The patient should be informed about this risk. Additional research is needed to define optimal MRONJ care for this population.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pamidronate is used for the treatment of hypercalcemia. However, a rare but potential adverse event of pamidronate treatment is hypocalcemia. This report describes an unusual case of severe, irreversible hypocalcemia after a single injection of pamidronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia due to glucocorticoid withdrawal in a dog. CASE PRESENTATION: An 11-year-old castrated male Maltese dog presented with anorexia, vomiting, and diarrhea (day 0). The patient had calcinosis cutis throughout the body, calcification of intraabdominal organs, mild azotemia, and severe hypercalcemia. The severe calcification was attributed to long-term glucocorticoid administration, which was discontinued 1 month before presentation. Fluid therapy, diuretics, calcitonin, and a single intravenous injection of pamidronate were used for the treatment of hypercalcemia. On day 14, normocalcemia was achieved, but renal failure occurred. On day 20, severe and irreversible hypocalcemia occurred, and on day 42, the patient was euthanized at the owner's request because of worsened hypocalcemia and renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although hypocalcemia is an extremely rare adverse event of bisphosphonate treatment, bisphosphonates like pamidronate can result in potentially life-threatening conditions according to the patient's underlying conditions. Therefore, the patient's condition should be closely monitored and any underlying conditions should be carefully evaluated before initiating the treatment for hypercalcemia using pamidronate.