Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Oncogenic Tissue Remodeling during Progression from Common Nevi to Early Melanoma.

Early detection and treatment of melanoma, the most aggressive skin cancer, improves the median 5-year survival rate of patients from 25% to 99%. Melanoma development involves a stepwise process during which genetic changes drive histologic alterations within nevi and surrounding tissue. Herein, a comprehensive analysis of publicly available gene expression data sets of melanoma, common or congenital nevi (CN), and dysplastic nevi (DN), assessed molecular and genetic pathways leading to early melanoma. The results demonstrate several pathways reflective of ongoing local structural tissue remodeling activity likely involved during the transition from benign to early-stage melanoma. These processes include the gene expression of cancer-associated fibroblasts, collagens, extracellular matrix, and integrins, which assist early melanoma development and the immune surveillance that plays a substantial role at this early stage. Furthermore, genes up-regulated in DN were also overexpressed in melanoma tissue, supporting the notion that DN may serve as a transitional phase toward oncogenesis. CN collected from healthy individuals exhibited different gene signatures compared with histologically benign nevi tissue located adjacent to melanoma (adjacent nevi). Finally, the expression profile of microdissected adjacent nevi tissue was more similar to melanoma compared with CN, revealing the melanoma influence on this annexed tissue.

Pitfalls of PRAME Immunohistochemistry in a Large Series of Melanocytic and Nonmelanocytic Lesions With Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is currently used to facilitate distinction of benign and malignant melanocytic proliferations. We hypothesized that evaluation of 1 institution's experience with PRAME labeling in a large number of consecutive cases might elucidate additional strengths and potential pitfalls and reveal base rates of positivity versus negativity in 1 academic practice. Pathology reports for all specimens on which PRAME labeling was performed at our institution between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrieved from our database. Eighty percent of conventional malignant melanomas were labeled diffusely positive with PRAME; there were no significant differences in mean age, sex, site, Breslow depth, ulceration status, or American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological tumor stage when comparing diffusely PRAME-positive malignant melanomas with those that lack diffuse labeling. Although no banal melanocytic nevi were labeled with PRAME, 13% of dysplastic nevi were diffusely PRAME positive, with junctional proliferations, severe atypia, male gender, and older age being associated with PRAME positivity. As some but not all ambiguous melanocytic lesions in which malignancy could not be excluded based on morphology alone were diffusely PRAME positive, PRAME's accuracy in predicting malignancy remains unclear to the authors; further study is needed to assess the precision to which PRAME immunohistochemistry can separate benign borderline lesions from their malignant counterparts. Among nonmelanocytic lesions, some poorly differentiated tumors, including atypical fibroxanthomas, can be PRAME positive. This series underscores the importance of clinicopathologic correlation and shows that diffuse PRAME positivity is highest in conventional malignant melanomas (∼80%, or 8 of 10 lesions), is seen in about half of challenging borderline lesions at our institution, and can be observed in lesions diagnosed as dysplastic nevi by our group (∼10% or 1 in 10 lesions), as well as in rare poorly differentiated malignancies.

Consistency of convolutional neural networks in dermoscopic melanoma recognition: A prospective real-world study about the pitfalls of augmented intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have outperformed even experienced dermatologists in dermoscopic melanoma detection under controlled conditions. It remains unexplored how real-world dermoscopic image transformations affect CNN robustness. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consistency of melanoma risk assessment by two commercially available CNNs to help formulate recommendations for current clinical use. METHODS: A comparative cohort study was conducted from January to July 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel. Five dermoscopic images of 116 different lesions on the torso of 66 patients were captured consecutively by the same operator without deliberate rotation. Classification was performed by two CNNs (CNN-1/CNN-2). Lesions were divided into four subgroups based on their initial risk scoring and clinical dignity assessment. Reliability was assessed by variation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Excisions were performed for melanoma suspicion or two consecutively elevated CNN risk scores, and benign lesions were confirmed by expert consensus (n = 3). RESULTS: 117 repeated image series of 116 melanocytic lesions (2 melanomas, 16 dysplastic naevi, 29 naevi, 1 solar lentigo, 1 suspicious and 67 benign) were classified. CNN-1 demonstrated superior measurement repeatability for clinically benign lesions with an initial malignant risk score (mean variation coefficient (mvc): CNN-1: 49.5(±34.3)%; CNN-2: 71.4(±22.5)%; p = 0.03), while CNN-2 outperformed for clinically benign lesions with benign scoring (mvc: CNN-1: 49.7(±22.7)%; CNN-2: 23.8(±29.3)%; p = 0.002). Both systems exhibited lowest score consistency for lesions with an initial malignant risk score and benign assessment. In this context, averaging three initial risk scores achieved highest sensitivity of dignity assessment (CNN-1: 94%; CNN-2: 89%). Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated 'moderate'-to-'good' reliability for both systems (CNN-1: 0.80, 95% CI:0.71-0.87, p < 0.001; CNN-2: 0.67, 95% CI:0.55-0.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Potential user-induced image changes can significantly influence CNN classification. For clinical application, we recommend using the average of three initial risk scores. Furthermore, we advocate for CNN robustness optimization by cross-validation with repeated image sets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04605822).

Can we manage the melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules according to the grade of dysplasia?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Although excision of melanocytic nevi with high-grade dysplasia is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), clinical studies investigating the approach based on the grading dysplasia of melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules (PGs) are lacking. We investigated the grades of dysplasia and their distinguishable dermoscopic and clinical features to provide accurate data for managing these lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively classified histologically confirmed melanocytic lesions with PGs according to the 2018 WHO Classification of Skin Tumours criteria in a university hospital in Turkey. Dermoscopic features, lesions, and patient characteristics were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-six lesions of 56 patients were included. After classification, 9.1% (n: 6) of lesions were melanomas, 39.4% (n: 26) were high-grade dysplastic nevi, and 50% (n: 33) were low-grade dysplastic nevi (n: 33, 50%). There was one nevus with no dysplasia (n: 1, 1.5%). Univariate analysis revealed that ≥31 years of age, irregular shape of peripheral globules, black colour, total colour count, and maximum diameter of the lesion were associated with high-grade dysplasia and melanoma. In the multivariate analyses, ≥31 years of age (OR = 3.80, 95% CI, 1.17-12.37), irregular shape of peripheral globules (OR = 3.90, 95% CI, 1.15-13.2), and total colour count (OR = 3.21, 95% CI, 1.2-8.5) were significant predictive factors for the lesions with high-grade dysplasia and melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid the underdiagnosis of both melanomas and high-grade dysplastic nevi with PGs, the irregular shape of peripheral globules and multiple colours after the third decade may be useful in making an excision decision. The risk increases every 1-year increase in age. Excision is suggested for all melanocytic lesions with PGs for patients 60 years or older because of the high risk of melanoma and melanocytic nevus with high-grade dysplasia.

Dysplastic nevus part I: Historical perspective, classification, and epidemiology.

Since the late 1970s, the diagnosis and management of dysplastic nevi have been areas fraught with controversy in the fields of dermatology and dermatopathology. Diagnostic uncertainty and lack of standardized nomenclature continue to propagate confusion among clinicians, dermatopathologists, and patients. In part I of this CME review article, we summarize the historical context that gave rise to the debate surrounding dysplastic nevi and review key features for diagnosis, classification, and management, as well as epidemiology. We discuss essentials of clinical criteria, dermoscopic features, histopathologic features, and the diagnostic utility of total body photography and reflectance confocal microscopy in evaluating dysplastic nevi, with emphasis on information available since the last comprehensive review a decade ago.

Dysplastic nevus part II: Dysplastic nevi: Molecular/genetic profiles and management.

Dermatologists frequently see patients with clinically atypical nevi and dermatopathologists interpret histologically dysplastic nevi on a near-daily basis, but there is great variability in the definition and management of such lesions. This part of the CME review focuses on information published since the previous comprehensive review (2012), with emphasis on molecular and genetic attributes of histologically dysplastic nevi and clinical management.

Factors associated with suspected nonmelanoma skin cancers, dysplastic nevus, and cutaneous melanoma among first-time SpotMe screening program participants during 2009-2010.

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies of the American Academy of Dermatology's SpotMe skin cancer screening program to collectively analyze and determine the factors associated with suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), dysplastic nevus (DN), and cutaneous melanoma (CM) diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: Describe the demographics, risk factors, and access to care profiles associated with suspected diagnoses of BCC, SCC, DN, and CM among first-time SpotMe screenees during 2009-2010. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the SpotMe skin cancer screenings conducted in 2009 and 2010. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis for each diagnosis, incorporating standard demographic, access to care, and risk factor variables in the models. RESULTS: Men, those without a regular dermatologist, persons reporting recently changing moles, and those with a personal history of melanoma were at increased risk for each of the suspected diagnoses analyzed. Uninsured persons were at increased risk for suspected malignancies (BCC, SCC, and CM). LIMITATIONS: Lack of histologic confirmation for diagnoses and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSION: Among first-time SpotMe participants, suspected diagnoses of BCC, SCC, DN, and CM shared several associated factors, which may be considered when planning outreach and screening for populations at risk for skin cancer.

Differences in nomenclature usage and preference among dermatopathologists for "dysplastic" nevi: A national survey.

BACKGROUND: Ongoing controversy exists regarding terminology used to describe atypical melanocytic nevi. Efforts to standardize nomenclature, including the 1992 NIH consensus conference, have been largely unsuccessful. Significant advances have revealed an increasingly detailed genetic picture of melanocytic neoplasms, including strong evidence for the existence of those with "intermediate" behavior. METHODS: We sent an electronic survey to dermatopathologists (n = 846) to assess trends in nomenclature usage and attitudes toward developing new consensus nomenclature for atypical melanocytic nevi. RESULTS: There were 229 complete responses (27.1% response rate). The most used/preferred nomenclature was "dysplastic nevus" (43%/39%, respectively), followed by the NIH-recommended terminology (28%/26%). Three-tier grading systems were most heavily used/preferred (79%/63%). Dermatopathologists based in New England were most likely to use the NIH terminology; on the other hand, "dysplastic nevus" or "other" were most used elsewhere (p = 0.029). Most (76%) expressed at least "moderate" enthusiasm for developing consensus nomenclature, with 47% "very" or "extremely" enthusiastic. CONCLUSION: Little has changed with the wide variation in terminology for atypical melanocytic nevi. There continues to be no one dominant terminology in use. However, there is enthusiasm for standardization. A new attempt at updated consensus nomenclature may be fruitful.

Comparing Follicular Extension Between Low-Grade and High-Grade Dysplastic Nevi.

ABSTRACT: Dysplastic nevi are an important subset of melanocytic nevi with atypical clinical, histopathologic, as well as genomic features compared with common acquired nevi. Dysplastic nevi are characterized histologically by both cytologic atypia and architectural disorder. The established criteria for cytologic atypia used to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi are often subjective, although there is a dearth of more objective, reproducible features of architectural disorder (eg, pagetoid scatter) that have been validated to differentiate between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence and degree of follicular extension differ between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. We retrospectively examined the histopathologic features of 90 dysplastic nevi: 60 cases of low-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.2 ± 18.1 years; 62.7% female) and 30 cases of high-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.4 ± 19.8 years; 60.0% female). After examination, 50% of the cases of dysplastic nevi (n = 45) had hair follicles within the lesion, for which the presence and degree of follicular extension was then determined. Low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi do not differ significantly regarding the presence of follicular extension, average depth of follicular extension, and confluence of nevus cells along the follicular epithelium. Both low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi in our study demonstrated follicular extension that was superficial, that is, above the level of isthmus of hair follicles (insertion of sebaceous gland into hair follicle). Future studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Diagnostically Challenging Melanocytic Neoplasms.

ABSTRACT: Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations (TPMs) have been shown to be common in melanoma and uncommon in benign nevi. To assess the use of TPMs as an ancillary diagnostic tool, we report the concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis in clinical cases with distinct differential diagnostic scenarios: dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, atypical Spitz nevus versus melanoma, atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) versus melanoma, and atypical blue nevus versus malignant blue nevus. In a control cohort, we found a positive TPM in 51/70 (73%) of the total melanomas with the highest frequency in vertical growth phase melanoma cases. Conversely, only 2/35 (6%) dysplastic nevi in our control cases were TPM-positive and b were severely atypical dysplastic nevi. Our clinical cohort of 257 cases had a positive TPM in 24% of cases diagnosed as melanoma and in 1% of cases with a benign diagnosis. The overall concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis was 86%. The TPM status had the greatest concordance (95%) with the final diagnosis in the atypical DPN versus melanoma group, with the rest of the groups ranging between 50% and 88%. Overall, our results suggest that TPMs are most useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical DPN versus melanoma. It also has some value in the differential diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumor versus melanoma and dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, whereas in our cohort, it did not contribute meaningfully to differentiating malignant blue nevus and atypical blue nevus.

Diagnostic utility of combining PRAME and HMB-45 stains in primary melanocytic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pathologists face ongoing challenges distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic tumors. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) has a demonstrated value distinguishing between these types of lesions. However, the sensitivity of single immunohistochemistry is variable. HMB-45 is another valuable marker, but on its own, has a limited ability in setting of primary melanocytic tumors. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a dual panel combining PRAME and HMB-45 in the assessment of primary melanocytic tumors. METHODS: 259 tumors, of which 141 were benign nevi, 31 dysplastic nevi (either low- or high grade dysplasia), and further 87 malignant melanomas, were retrieved from the department's archives and assessed by two experienced dermatopathologists. New sections were stained with PRAME and HMB-45, respectively. For PRAME, a nuclear, and for HMB-45, a cytoplasmic staining, was considered positive and scored as described in the literature on a scale from 0 to 4+. Only dermal component was assessed on HMB-45 stain. RESULTS: PRAME was diffusely expressed in only 1 benign nevus, with focal expression in further 28 compared to 22 diffusely and 103 focally HMB-45-positive benign nevi. 5 high-grade dysplastic nevi showed diffuse PRAME expression in epidermal component, with varying degree of positivity in adjacent dermal compartment, and further 8 dysplastic nevi showed only focal expression. HMB-45 was diffusely expressed in only 2, with focal expression in 23, and no apparent positivity in remaining 6 dysplastic nevi. In invasive melanoma group, PRAME stained >75 % cells in 64/87 tumors, however, 10/87 melanomas were completely negative. HMB-45 was captured diffusely in 49/87 melanomas, 32 showed patchy expression, and 6 tumors were blank negative. Diffuse 4+ PRAME positivity showed superior sensitivity and specificity of 73,6 % and 96,5 %, respectively, compared to HMB-45, 56,3 % and 86,0 %, respectively. No nevi showed double 4+ positivity, however, the sensitivity for double positivity was only 49,4 %. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the superiority of PRAME over HMB-45 in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, combined staining can significantly increase specificity, rendering a benign diagnosis more unlikely in a double 4+ diffuse positivity setting.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of 5-hmC Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is an important intermediate of DNA demethylation. Hypomethylation of DNA is frequent in cancer, resulting in deregulation of 5-hmC levels in melanoma. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of 5-hmC immunoreactivity is not very standardized, which makes its interpretation difficult. In this study, 5-hmC-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic compound nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. Receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve (ROCAUC) and t-tests were performed. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROCAUC score of >0.8 was considered a "good" result. In total, 92 5-hmC-stained specimens were analyzed, including 42 SSM (45.7%) and 50 DN (54.3%). The mean of 5-hmC-positive cells/mm2 for the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction and the entire lesion differed significantly between DN and SSM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006, respectively) and showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in the dermal component (p = 0.069). The ROCAUC of 5-hmC-positive cells of the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction was 0.79, for the dermis 0.74, and for the entire lesion 0.76. These results show that the assessment of the epidermal with junctional expression of 5-hmC is slightly superior to dermal immunoreactivity in distinguishing between DN and SSM.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of PRAME Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a cancer testis antigen that is frequently expressed in melanoma compared to benign melanocytic proliferations and nevi. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of PRAME immunostaining is not standardized a lot, which makes interpretation difficult. PRAME-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. t-tests and ROC AUCs were performed with SPSS. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROC AUC score of >0.8 was considered a good result. A cut-off score was defined in an evaluation cohort and subsequently analyzed in an independent validation cohort. In total, 81 PRAME-stained specimens were included. The evaluation cohort included 32 (50%) SSM and 32 (50%) DN, and the mean of PRAME-positive cells/mm2 for the entire lesion was 455.3 (SD 428.2) in SSM and 60.5 (SD 130.1; p < 0.001) in DN. The ROC AUC of PRAME-positive cells of the entire lesion was 0.866, and in the epidermis it was 0.901. The defined cut-off score to distinguish between DN and SSM was 97.67 cells/mm2. In the validation cohort, 16 out of 17 cases (94.1%) were correctly classified by the cut-off score. The computer-aided assessment of PRAME immunostaining is a useful tool in dermatopathology to distinguish between DN and SSM. Lesions with a moderate expression and indifferent morphologic features will remain a challenge for dermatopathologists.

Rapid Growth and Evolution of a Dysplastic Nevus During Pregnancy.

During pregnancy, many patients may experience changes in the size or characteristics of pigmented lesions including common and dysplastic nevi. These changes can be a cause for concern for the patient and their physician due to the potential for melanoma. Over the past several decades conflicting data has been reported about the relationship between pregnancy and the peripartum period and melanocytic nevi/melanoma. Although recent evidence suggests that prognosis is not worse among pregnant patients who develop melanoma, the discovery of several distinct types of estrogen receptors present in skin and effects of other hormones on melanoma suggest possible mechanisms through which melanocytic lesions may evolve. Many observations among patients with dysplastic nevus syndrome and those without this diagnosis can provide some evidence for how and why melanocytic lesions may change during pregnancy and provide support for clinical decisions in managing such concerns. Here we describe the case of a 27-year-old female who presented to the clinic with concerns of two moles which evolved and grew in diameter during two successive pregnancies but had no changes in the intervening time period.

Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). / Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). RESULTS: We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases.

NEIGHBOURING MELANOMAS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVUS DEVELOPING SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER CANDESARTAN INTAKE: NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/ AVAILABILITY AS MAIN CAUSE FOR SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION.

Although the problem with nitrosamines and their connection to the generation of skin cancer deepens, it is also thoroughly, carefully, and obligingly neglected. The probable reason for this is in all likelihood the lack of a solution or way out of this situation at the regulatory level. There is almost no sartan (on the European market/certain countries) after taking which the development of single or multiple melanomas, as well as melanomas in combination with single/multiple keratinocyte tumors, is not observed. But also, skin tumors (again melanomas) in combination with up to two other tumors - simultaneously or subsequently. These cases are immediately reported to the regional regulatory units, but unfortunately to no avail. Valsartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, and now candesartan is the main "suspect medications" for the development of melanomas, regardless of the dilemma: 1) whether the available nitrosamine remains responsible (for melanoma) as a mono/poly-contaminant (as availability or at a certain dose) or 2) is the generic substance itself also partly to blame? The literature data on the subject are contradictory, but does not exclude the involvement of any of these units in the generation and progression of melanomas. The lack of official results of possible checks for the presence (of nitrosamines) after the side effect reports were submitted to regulatory bodies further deepened the doubts of the clinicians, supporting the possible pathogenetic role of not only nitrosamines as a key link regarding the development of skin cancer. In practice, permissive regimes for the availability of carcinogens/mutagens in minimum permissible amounts, have been established? It is unclear whether this should be interpreted as a powerlessness of the regulatory authorities in the face of powerful pharmaceutical concerns? Or is it rather a lull before the start of general regulatory changes and a forthcoming "shifting of the layers"? The paradox also arises from the fact that many contaminated batches are quickly, quietly withdrawn from the market, despite being declared harmless or dangerous only for animals. We report on a patient who developed thin melanoma and neighbouring melanoma in situ after receiving candesartan, treated via one step melanoma surgery within one surgical session with a complete surgical margin of 2 cm. In parallel with the mentioned, a dysplastic nevus was observed clinically and confirmed dermatoscopically in the area of left scapula, for which surgical treatment is planned. Based on the currently available literature data, a thorough analysis of the role of nitrosamines, as a possible powerful pathogenetic factor for the occurrence and progression of melanomas, was made. The possible role of the generic substance as a cofactor in the carcinogenesis of skin cancer is also discussed.

MELANOMA AND DYSPLASTIC NEVI DEVELOPMENT AFTER RANITIDINE/RILMENIDINE/МOXONIDINE, LERCANIDIPINE, ROSUVASTATIN AND VERAPAMIL/TRANDOLAPRIL - NEW DATA/CASE SERIES. THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF NITROSAMINE/NDSRIS CONTAMINATION IN POLYMEDICATION AS SUBSTANTIAL SKIN CANCER TRIGGERING FACTOR.

The idea of drug-induced/exogenic Nitrosogenesis is driven by the possibility of prolonged exposure of the human body to the influence of nitrosamines within the drug intake - substances or contaminants that have been proven to be carcinogenic or mutagenic one.Until recently, there was a complete lack of data in the scientific literature on the relationship between cancer, polymedication and polycontamination with nitrosamines. In the last decade, melanoma has been described repeatedly in the medical literature as a possible side-effect within the intake of possibly with nitrosamines contaminated medications such as: Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, Amlodipine, Nebivolol, Bisoprolol and Perindopril. However, the contribution of the currently presented new data (5 new patients) is also due to the establishment of the possible pathogenetic role (with respect to melanoma) of several completely new drugs, previously unknown to the scientific community (potentially/actually contaminated with carcinogens/nitrosamines), such as: Ranitidine, Rosuvastatin, Lercanidipine, Rilmenidine, Trandolapril, Moxonidine and Verapamil.The leading and connecting link in shared new and old drug combinations of heterogeneous drug classes (polymedication) and melanoma development and progression remains again one and the same: the possible availability of nitroso component in the frame of exogenous nitrosogenesis according to the official FDA lists of 2023.The number of drugs shared as contaminated with nitrosamines after whose intake melanomas occur is increasing. Nitrosogenesis remains a new beginning, a new understanding and new interpretation of the carcinogenesis concerning melanoma, but probably also of cancer in general. Its further elucidation looks more than promising and is yet to come. More than worrying at the moment remains the fact that the scientific community has to clarify if: 1) peak concentrations of nitrosamines or NDSRIs within the framework of monomedication or 2) normal concentrations within the polymedication (catalogued in the list of FDA/ 2023 as potentially contaminated with hypothetical carcinogens), could hide relatively short-term risk of the development of real tumors: cutaneous melanomas and/or their precursor lesions. The validation of the concept of Nitrosogenesis and its relationship to Сarcinogenesis, is achieved in practice on the basis of the following facts: that it is the occurrence of the same monomorphic clinical pattern (melanoma/dysplastic nevi), developing after the intake of drugs with different mechanism of action, contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs. The unifying link between the intake of certain drugs and the development of certain tumours remains the presence of nitrosamines. Ingredients that are present in drug preparations, identified as availability and as carcinogenic potency, but not yet reflected in packaging or prescriptions. The question remains: why?

"THE DANGEROUS BRASSIERE" AND THE NEVUS ASSOCIATED POLYPOID MELANOMA: CONNECTION SEEMS PLAUSIBLE?

The development of cutaneous melanoma of the skin based on dysplastic nevus is not uncommon. The causes of the progression of nevi to melanomas are numerous and not well understood at present. Certain genetic and epigenetic factors have a major influence on this evolution. We describe a 46-year-old female patient with multiple dermal melanocytic nevi who developed a polypoid melanoma in one of them. After a carefully performed anamnesis, the mole that developed into melanoma was found to be localized in the dorsal area adjacent to the brassiere and underwent permanent and daily mechanical irradiation during the last 6-7 years. Around this mole there were 5 other moles with similar clinical and dermatoscopic morphology, which did not transform into melanomas and were not subjected to mechanical irritation. The patient had a dermatological examination 6 years ago and it was suggested that this lesion has to be surgically removed, which she declined. The patient was treated surgically and the lesion suspicious for cutaneous melanoma was removed in two stages according to the generally accepted AJCC/EJC recommendations. In parallel, 5 additional melanocytic nevi were removed, which histologically had features of dysplastic dermal melanocytic nevi but no signs of progression to melanoma. This article discusses the causes of nevus -associated melanomas and emphasizes the thesis of potential malignant transformation through mechanical irritation - in this case that of the brassiere. The moles localized in this area, although clinically and dermatoscopically inapparent, should be treated surgically. This painless, short-term manipulation has a preventive effect on the future development of cutaneous melanomas.

MULTIPLE BCCS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVI AFTER ACE INHIBITORS (ENALAPRIL/PERINDOPRIL): THE ROLE OF NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/AVAILABILITY AS SUBSTANTIAL SKIN CANCER TRIGGERING FACTOR.

Nitrosamines as contaminants in a wide variety of drugs are also found to be one of the most likely causes of skin cancer. A detailed analysis of this contamination could in the near future solve to a large extent the puzzle of carcinogenesis concerning the keratinocytic forms of cancer and melanoma. But also, probably cancer in general. Over 80% of skin cancer is due to acquired mutations, and nitrosamines, which are contained as contamination in certain batches of the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (such as sartans, ACE inhibitors, ranitidine, metformin, hydrochlorothiazide, rifampicin, and a number of others.) are considered among the most powerful external mutagens, carcinogens. Carcinogens that until 2021 were not supposed to be present in medicines and carcinogens for which it was subsequently decided to create a regulatory regime for permissible availability. Regardless of whether these contaminants are applied within the so-called daily acceptable intake dose or many times above it, the problem with the availability of nitrosamines continues to be present. It is also caused by the lack of reflection of the concentration of the corresponding nitrosamine in a certain drug. Thus, it is impossible to calculate the ˝permissible daily intake of the total number of mutagens and their concentration based on polymedication˝. In practice, drug manufacturers distribute nitrosamines in parallel with drugs, although they are not listed as a component of the product but are identified and allowed as contamination or substances with permissible availability by the EMA/FDA. From another point of view, the fact that is not commented on is also of interest, namely that not all batches are affected by this contamination. This suggests that the contamination may have been controlled, since in a manufacturing error the contamination should be widespread. The registration of the potential contamination of a heterogeneous type of medicinal products on the European market to the executive agencies for drug control in certain geographical areas has remained for years without any answer and opens a number of questions. The problem with ACE inhibitors is similar to that with sartans, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, and ranitidine. The ˝special impression˝ of the clinicians is determined by the fact that the patterns of manifestation of the skin tumors during the administration of a heterogeneous class of medications are similar to completely identical. From this it could be concluded that the unifying factor between the pattern of occurrence could not be based on the action of the main substance of each drug class, since it remains to be radically different. The unifying link remains the sole and only contamination or the permissible already availability of a new ingredient known as nitrosamines. We present cases of multiple basal cell carcinomas and dysplastic nevi following enalapril and perindopril administration. The role of potential contamination of ACE inhibitors with nitrosamines for the development of skin cancer is discussed.

Analysis of interobserver reproducibility in grading dysplastic nevi: Results of the application of the 2018 World Health Organization grading criteria.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether the histopathological grading of dysplastic nevi is an objective endeavor, considering interobserver variability, according to 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. METHODS: In total, 179 cases of dysplastic nevi, with high and moderate degree of atypia, diagnosed and graded according to the previous criteria were reviewed by three pathologists. Then, the observers graded the dysplastic nevi as low or high according to 2018 WHO criteria. RESULTS: Grading of dysplastic nevi was in complete agreement in 99 out of 179 cases across three observers with a fair level of overall interobserver agreement (multirater κfree : 0.40). The observers showed moderate to good agreement for most of the architectural features, except for criteria regarding focal continuous basal proliferation of melanocytes, density of non-nested junctional melanocytes, and presence of dyscohesive nests of intraepidermal melanocytes, whereas fair agreement was achieved for the cytological criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The 2018 WHO criteria for dysplastic nevus will ensure a common approach to the diagnosis and grading of dysplastic nevi. However, histopathological criteria, such as cytological features and focal continuous basal proliferation of melanocytes, should be improved so as to ensure a more accurate surgical approach and risk assessment.