ABSTRACT
The purpose of this computational study was to investigate the effects of neonate-focused clinical delivery maneuvers on brachial plexus (BP) during shoulder dystocia. During shoulder dystocia, the anterior shoulder of the neonate is obstructed behind the symphysis pubis of the maternal pelvis, postdelivery of the neonate's head. This is managed by a series of clinical delivery maneuvers. The goal of this study was to simulate these delivery maneuvers and study their effects on neonatal BP strain. Using madymo models of a maternal pelvis and a 90th-percentile neonate, various delivery maneuvers and positions were simulated including the lithotomy position alone of the maternal pelvis, delivery with the application of various suprapubic pressures (SPPs), neonate in an oblique position, and during posterior arm delivery maneuver. The resulting BP strain (%) along with the required maternal delivery force was reported in these independently simulated scenarios. The lithotomy position alone served as the baseline. Each of the successive maneuvers reported a decrease in the required delivery force and resulting neonatal BP strain. As the applied SPP force increased (three scenarios simulated), the required maternal delivery force and neonatal BP strain decreased. A further decrease in both delivery force and neonatal BP strain was observed in the oblique position, with the lowest delivery force and neonatal BP strain reported during the posterior arm delivery maneuver. Data obtained from the improved computational models in this study enhance our understanding of the effects of clinical maneuvers on neonatal BP strain during complicated birthing scenarios such as shoulder dystocia.
Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus , Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Dystocia/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of shoulder dystocia (SD) simulation training on the management of SD and the incidence of permanent brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Helsinki University Women's Hospital, Finland. SAMPLE: Deliveries with SD. METHODS: Multi-professional, regular and systematic simulation training for obstetric emergencies began in 2015, and SD was one of the main themes. A study was conducted to assess changes in SD management and the incidence of permanent BPBI. The study period was from 2010 to 2019; years 2010-2014 were considered the pre-training period and years 2015-2019 were considered the post-training period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of permanent BPBI after the implementation of systematic simulation training. Changes in the management of SD were also analysed. RESULTS: During the study period, 113 085 vertex deliveries were recorded. The incidence of major SD risk factors (gestational diabetes, induction of labour, vacuum extraction) increased and was significantly higher for each of these factors during the post-training period (p < 0.001). The incidence of SD also increased significantly (0.01% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001) during the study period, but the number of children with permanent BPBI decreased by 55% after the implementation of systematic simulation training (0.05% vs 0.02%, p < 0.001). The most significant change in the management of SD was the increased incidence of successful delivery of the posterior arm. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic simulation-based training of midwives and doctors can translate into improved individual and team performance and can significantly reduce the incidence of permanent BPBI.
Subject(s)
Birth Injuries , Brachial Plexus , Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Simulation Training , Pregnancy , Child , Female , Humans , Shoulder Dystocia/epidemiology , Shoulder Dystocia/therapy , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/therapy , Dystocia/etiology , Birth Injuries/epidemiology , Birth Injuries/prevention & control , Incidence , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/education , Risk Factors , ShoulderABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and impact of fistulas are more common in developing countries with limited access to emergency obstetric care. As a result, women in these settings often experience adverse psychosocial factors. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of Congolese women who developed urogenital fistula following Cesarean sections (CS) to determine the characteristics associated with two etiologies: (1) prolonged obstructed labor; and (2) a complication of CS following obstructed labor. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study on abstracted data from all patients with urogenital fistula following CS who received care during a surgical campaign in a remote area of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Descriptive analyses characterized patients with fistula related to obstructed labor versus CS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models identified factors associated with obstetric fistula after cesarean delivery following obstructed labor. Variables were included in the logistic regression models based upon biological plausibility. RESULTS: Among 125 patients, urogenital fistula etiology was attributed to obstructed labor in 77 (62%) and complications following CS in 48 (38%). Women with a fistula, attributed to obstructed labor, developed the fistula at a younger age (p = .04) and had a lower parity (p = .02). Attempted delivery before arriving at the hospital was associated with an increased risk of obstetric fistula after cesarean delivery following obstructed labor (p < .01). CONCLUSION: CS are commonly performed on women who arrive at the hospital following prolonged obstructed labor and fetal demise, and account for almost 40% of urogenital fistula. Obstetric providers should assess maternal status upon arrival to prevent unnecessary CS and identify women at risk of developing a fistula.
Subject(s)
Dystocia , Obstetric Labor Complications , Vesicovaginal Fistula , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vesicovaginal Fistula/epidemiology , Vesicovaginal Fistula/etiology , Vesicovaginal Fistula/prevention & control , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Parity , Dystocia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) is widely perceived as protective against obstetric brachial plexus injury (BPI), but few studies acknowledge the factors associated with such injury. The objectives of this study were therefore to aggregate cases of BPI after CS, and to illuminate risk factors for BPI. METHODS: Pubmed Central, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched using free text: ("brachial plexus injury" or "brachial plexus injuries" or "brachial plexus palsy" or "brachial plexus palsies" or "Erb's palsy" or "Erb's palsies" or "brachial plexus birth injury" or "brachial plexus birth palsy") and ("caesarean" or "cesarean" or "Zavanelli" or "cesarian" or "caesarian" or "shoulder dystocia"). Studies with clinical details of BPI after CS were included. Studies were assessed using the National Institutes for Healthy Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series, Cohort and Case-Control Studies. MAIN RESULTS: 39 studies were eligible. 299 infants sustained BPI after CS. 53% of cases with BPI after CS had risk factors for likely challenging handling/manipulation of the fetus prior to delivery, in the presence of considerable maternal or fetal concerns, and/or in the presence of poor access due to obesity or adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of factors that would predispose to a challenging delivery, it is difficult to justify that BPI could occur due to in-utero, antepartum events alone. Surgeons should exercise care when operating on women with these risk factors.
Subject(s)
Birth Injuries , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies , Brachial Plexus , Dystocia , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies/epidemiology , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies/etiology , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies/prevention & control , Case-Control Studies , Risk Factors , Paralysis/complications , Birth Injuries/epidemiology , Birth Injuries/etiology , Dystocia/etiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: There are few data on maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with shoulder dystocia (SD), depending on the use of fetal manipulation (FM). A prior 5-year study was conducted in our center in 2012 for this purpose. Our objective was to compare severe maternal and neonatal morbidities according to FM execution in a larger cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study between 2007 and 2020. SD was considered when additional maneuvers were required to complete a delivery. Severe maternal morbidity was defined as the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Severe neonatal morbidity was defined as Apgar < 7 at 5 min and/or cord arterial pH < 7.1 and/or or a permanent brachial plexus palsy. We studied these data in the FM group compared to the non- FM group. RESULTS: FM was associated with increased OASI rates (21.1% vs. 3.8%, OR = 6.72 [2.7-15.8]). We found no significant difference in severe neonatal morbidity. Maternal age > 35 and FM appear to be associated with the occurrence of OASI, with ORa = 13.3 [1.5-121.8] and ORa = 5.3 [2.2-12.8], respectively. FM was the only factor associated with the occurrence of severe neonatal morbidity (ORa = 2.3 [1.1-4.8]. The rate of episiotomy was significantly decreased (20% versus 5% p < 0.05) and there was an increase in the rate of SD managed with FM in our center. CONCLUSION: FM is the only factor associated with an increased risk of OASI. In case of failure of non-FM maneuvers, the rapid implementation of FM maneuvers resulted in no difference regarding severe neonatal morbidity.
Subject(s)
Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Shoulder Dystocia/epidemiology , Shoulder Dystocia/etiology , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/therapy , Dystocia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder , Morbidity , Risk Factors , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/methodsABSTRACT
We investigated the relationship between dam's pelvic and calf's dimensions with dystocia due to fetopelvic disproportion in the Holstein breed and estimated risk factors and dystocia probability. For this purpose, external pelvic measurements were performed in 402 heifers 15 ± 11 (1-38) days ante-partum and specific conformation measurements were obtained from their calves 1.7 ± 1.2 post-partum. Dystocia was defined as the inability of the heifer to complete parturition spontaneously within 120 min after the appearance of the amnion with normal presentation, position and posture or as having definite obstetrical obstacles within 60 min. Overall and fetopelvic disproportion dystocia incidence was 10.4% and 5.2%, respectively. Heifer measurements mainly influenced overall dystocia, whereas calf conformation was related solely with fetopelvic dystocia. Specifically, heifers with a small pelvis (hip width <49.95 cm, pelvic inlet area <333.2 cm2, pelvic volume <7799.2 cm3) had 2.8 to 3.5 times greater incidence of overall dystocia (19.0-20.8%) compared to heifers with a larger pelvis (incidence of 7.0-7.6%). Regarding calf factors, sex (male calves), body weight, chest circumference and fetlock joint circumference significantly increased the odds of experiencing dystocia due to fetopelvic disproportion compared with female, lighter or smaller calves. In a backward elimination model with independent variables treated as continuous, an area under the ROC curve of 0.66 regarding the prediction of overall dystocia based on heifer pelvic length, and of 0.64 for the prediction of fetopelvic dystocia based on fetlock joint circumference was found. The combination of the two variables in one model improved the ROC area to 0.71 regarding dystocia due to fetopelvic disproportion, reaching acceptable level of discrimination. Our findings indicate that dystocia due to fetopelvic disproportion in heifers is mainly influenced by the fetal side. Additionally, the estimation of pelvic dimensions of the dam before parturition and specific conformation characteristics of the calf during parturition, especially fetlock joint circumference, could aid obstetricians and herdsmen regarding dystocia probability and parturition surveillance.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Dystocia , Pregnancy , Animals , Cattle , Female , Male , Birth Weight , Dystocia/veterinary , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/etiology , Pelvis , Body Weight , Parturition , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Because there have been changes in the management of macrosomic pregnancies and shoulder dystocia in the past decade, this study was conducted to compare the incidences of shoulder dystocia and perinatal outcomes between the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit. All cases of shoulder dystocia were identified using the hospital's electronic database. The incidences, maternal and fetal characteristics, obstetric management methods, and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two study periods. RESULTS: The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia decreased from 0.23% (134/58 326) in 2000-2009 to 0.16% (108/65 683) in 2010-2019 (P=0.009), mainly because of the overall decline in the proportion of babies with macrosomia (from 3.3% to 2.3%; P<0.001). The improved success rates of the McRoberts' manoeuvre (from 31.3% to 47.2%; P=0.012) and posterior arm extraction (from 52.9% to 92.3%; P=0.042) allowed a greater proportion of affected babies to be delivered within 2 minutes (from 59.0% to 79.6%; P=0.003). These changes led to a significant reduction in the proportion of fetuses with low Apgar scores: <5 at 1 minute of life (from 13.4% to 5.6%; P=0.042) and <7 at 5 minutes of life (from 11.9% to 4.6%; P=0.045). CONCLUSION: More proactive management of macrosomic pregnancies and enhanced training in the acute management of shoulder dystocia led to significant improvements in shoulder dystocia incidence and perinatal outcomes from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019.
Subject(s)
Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/therapy , Dystocia/etiology , Incidence , Shoulder Dystocia/epidemiology , Shoulder Dystocia/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Hong Kong/epidemiology , ShoulderABSTRACT
The investigation studied the enkephalinergic neuro fibers (En) contained in the Lower Uterine Segment (LUS) during the prolonged dystocic labor (PDL) with Labor Neuraxial Analgesia (LNA). PDL is generally caused by fetal head malpositions in the Occiput Posterior Position (OPP), Persistent Occiput Posterior Position (POPP), in a transverse position (OTP), and asynclitism (A), and it is detected by Intrapartum Ultrasonography (IU). The En were detected in the LUS samples picked up during cesarean section (CS) of 38 patients undergoing urgent CS in PDL, compared to 37 patients submitted to elective CS. Results were statistically evaluated to understand the differences in En morphological analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by fluorescence microscopy (FM). The LUS samples analysis showed an important reduction in En in LUS of CS for the PDL group, in comparison with the elective CS group. The LUS overdistension, by fetal head malpositions (OPP, OTP, A) and malrotations, lead to dystocia, modification of vascularization, and En reduction. The En reduction in PDL suggests that drugs used during the LNA, usually local anesthetics and opioids, cannot control the "dystocic pain", that differs from normal labor pain. The IU administration in labor and the consequent diagnosis of dystocia suggest stopping the numerous and ineffective top-up drug administration during LNA, and to shift the labor to operative vaginal delivery or CS.
Subject(s)
Analgesia , Dystocia , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Dystocia/etiology , Analgesia/adverse effects , Neurotransmitter Agents , Pain/complications , EnkephalinsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obstetric fractures usually occur after complicated births and are sent to paediatric orthopaedics for treatment and follow-up. Clavicle fractures represent the most common orthopaedic birth injury, involving approximately 0.2 to 3.5% of births. HYPOTHESES: Caesarean delivery, elective or necessary, along with the type of presentation, may play a determinant role in the aetiology of obstetric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We chose to do a retrospective study to determine possible risk factors for this type of injury that may manifest in either delivery. Our aim was to deepen our knowledge in order to have a better prediction and a better management of this condition. Data gathered included parity, gestity, type of delivery, presentation, shoulder dystocia, type of fracture, birth weight, and APGAR score. RESULTS: We followed 136 patients that were diagnosed with Allman type I clavicle fracture, 32 of them also having brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) type 1 (Duchenne-Erb). Natural birth with a pelvic presentation imposes a relative risk of 6.2 of associated pathology compared to cranial presentation. Caesarean delivery and cranial presentation increase the risk of related pathology by 5.04 compared to natural birth. Statistically, pelvic presentation is 5.54 times more likely to develop related pathology than cranial presentation. Type of delivery and presentation correlate with associated pathology of clavicle fractures. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Caesarean delivery brings risks for the newborn and should be practiced only when necessary. Predictive modeling in obstetrics in third-trimester evaluations may statistically predict risks of birth complications like fracture and BPBP.
Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus Neuropathies , Dystocia , Fractures, Bone , Surgeons , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies/complications , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Child , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/etiology , Female , Fractures, Bone/complications , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Aim: The primary aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for the occurrence of brachial plexus injury in cases of shoulder dystocia. Secondly, it was aimed to determine the factors affecting the occurrence of permanent sequelae in cases with brachial plexus injury. Subjects and Methods: ICD-10 codes were scanned from the records of patients who gave birth between 2012 and 2018, and the records of patients with brachial plexus injury and shoulder dystocia were reached. Shoulder dystocia cases with brachial plexus damage were accepted as the study group, and shoulder dystocia cases without brachial plexus damage were considered the control group. Shoulder dystocia patients with brachial plexus injury and without injury were compared for 2-year orthopedics clinic follow-up reports, surgical intervention, permanent sequelae status as well as birth data, maternal characteristics, and maneuvers applied to the management of shoulder dystocia. Results: Five hundred sixty births with shoulder dystocia were detected. Brachial plexus injury was observed in 88 of them, and permanent sequelae were detected in 12 of these patients. Maneuvers other than McRobert's (advanced maneuvers) were used more and clavicle fracture was seen more in the group with plexus injury (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of brachial plexus injury. Brachial plexus injury was observed 4.746 times more in infants who were delivered with advanced maneuvers and 3.58 times more in infants with clavicle fractures at birth. Conclusion: In patients with shoulder dystocia, the risk of brachial plexus injury increased in deliveries in which advanced maneuvers were used and clavicle fracture occurred.
Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus , Dystocia , Fractures, Bone , Shoulder Dystocia , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric , Dystocia/epidemiology , Dystocia/etiology , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Dysfunctional labor is a common cause of cesarean delivery and may be caused by myometrial hypoxia. Obstruction of uterine venous return due to compression of the inferior vena cava by the gravid uterus or the abdominal wall may be an auxiliary cause of myometrial hypoxia which aggravates other causes.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall/pathology , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Dystocia/pathology , Hypoxia/physiopathology , Myometrium/physiopathology , Uterus/pathology , Vena Cava, Inferior/pathology , Dystocia/etiology , Female , Humans , Muscle Contraction , PregnancyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ovarian dysgerminoma, a subtype of malignant germ cell tumor (GCT), is a rare ovarian neoplasm that is infrequently found in the gravid patient. When dysgerminomas do occur in pregnancy, the rapidly growing tumors can have a heterogeneous presentation and lead to peripartum complications and morbidity. Due to the rarity of this condition, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are not well described in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A healthy multigravida with an uncomplicated antenatal history presented for elective induction of labor. She had a protracted labor course, persistently abnormal cervical examinations, and eventually developed a worsening Category II tracing that prompted cesarean birth. Intraoperatively, a 26 cm pelvic mass later identified as a Stage IA dysgerminoma was discovered along with a massive hemoperitoneum. The mass was successfully resected, and the patient remains without recurrence 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Although rare and generally indolent, dysgerminomas can grow rapidly and cause mechanical obstruction of labor and other complications in pregnancy. Pelvic masses, including malignant neoplasms, should be included in as part of a broad differential diagnosis when evaluating even routine intrapartum complications such as abnormal labor progression. Additionally, we demonstrate that adnexal masses can be a source of life-threatening intraabdominal hemorrhage.
Subject(s)
Dysgerminoma/complications , Dysgerminoma/diagnosis , Dystocia/etiology , Hemoperitoneum/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/complications , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Dysgerminoma/therapy , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Labour dystocia (LD) is associated with maternal and foeto-neonatal complications and increased rate of caesarean section. There are scant studies on predictive factors of labour dystocia in Iran, as well as in other countries. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictive factors of LD using an integrated and collaborative pre- and during- labour factors to help formulate more effective intervention strategies for prevention and management of LD. METHODS: In this case-control study, 350 women with and 350 women without LD, matched individually in terms of parity and hospital, were compared. The participants were in active labor, had singleton pregnancy, live foetus with a cephalic presentation, gestational age of 37+ 0-41+ 6 weeks, and were hospitalized for vaginal birth in two teaching hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. Data related to the socio-demographic characteristics, anxiety status (using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory), and woman dehydration were collected at cervical dilatation between 4 and 6 cm (before dystocia detection) and the other data at different phases of labour, and after birth (before discharge). The multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the predictors. RESULTS: The predictors of LD were severe [OR 58.0 (95% CI 26.9 to 125.1)] and moderate [8.6 (4.2 to 17.4)] anxiety, woman dehydration > 3 h [18.67 (4.0 to 87.3)] and ≤ 3 h [2.8 (1.7 to 4.8], insufficient support by the medical staff in the delivery room [5.8 (1.9 to 17.9)], remifentanil administration [3.1 (1.5 to 6.2)], labour induction [4.2 (2.5 to 7.2], low income [2.0 (1.2 to 3.3)], woman's height < 160 cm [2.0 (1.1 to 3.3)], and woman age of 16-20 y [0.3 (0.2 to 0.6)]. The proportion of the variance explained by all these factors was 74%. CONCLUSION: The controllable predictors, such as woman anxiety and dehydration, and insufficient support from medical staff during labour were strongly associated with the risk of LD. Therefore, it seems that responding to woman physical, psychological, and supportive needs during labour can play a significant role in LD prevention and control. ETHICAL CODE: IR.TBZMED.REC.1397.624.
Subject(s)
Dystocia/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Dehydration/physiopathology , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Iran , Labor Stage, First , Labor, Induced/adverse effects , Labor, Obstetric , Parity , Parturition , Pregnancy , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Labor induction is defined as any procedure that stimulates uterine contractions before labor begins spontaneously. The vaginal and oral routes of administration of misoprostol are those most used for the induction of labor in routine practice, with the recommended dose being 25 µg. Nevertheless, the sublingual route may reduce the number of vaginal examinations required, increasing patient comfort and lowering the risk of maternal and fetal infection. Based on a previous systematic review, the objective of this study was to compare the frequency of tachysystole as the main outcome measure when misoprostol is administered sublingually at the dose of 12.5 µg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 µg to induce labor in a full-term pregnancy with a live fetus. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted at two maternity hospitals in northeastern Brazil. Two hundred patients with a full-term pregnancy, a live fetus, Bishop score ≤ 6 and an indication for induction of labor were included. Following randomization, one group received 12.5 µg misoprostol sublingually and a vaginal placebo, while the other group received a sublingual placebo and 25 µg misoprostol vaginally. The primary outcome was the frequency of tachysystole. Student's t-test, the chi-square test of association and Fisher's exact test were used, as appropriate. Risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The frequency of tachysystole was lower in the group using 12.5 µg misoprostol sublingually compared to the group using 25 µg misoprostol vaginally (RR = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.02-0.97; p = 0.002). Failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 12 and 24 h was similar in both groups. Sublingual administration was preferred to vaginal administration by women in both groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of labor induction with low-dose sublingual misoprostol was similar to that achieved with vaginal administration of the recommended dose; however, the rate of tachysystole was lower in the sublingual group, and this route of administration may prove a safe alternative. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: NCT01406392, ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration: August 1, 2011.
Subject(s)
Labor, Induced/methods , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravaginal , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Brazil , Dystocia/etiology , Female , Humans , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risks of maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with macrosomia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a large maternity unit in the UK between January 2009 and December 2016. The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with macrosomia, defined as birth weight (BW) > 4000 g, and in those with severe macrosomia, defined as BW > 4500 g, was compared with that in pregnancies with normal BW (2500-4000 g). Regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) for complications in macrosomic pregnancies compared to those with normal BW. RESULTS: The study population of 35 548 pregnancies included 4522 (12.7%) with macrosomia, of which 643 (1.8%) had severe macrosomia, and 31 026 (87.3%) with normal BW. In the macrosomia group, the adjusted OR was 3.1 (95% CI, 2.6-3.6) for Cesarean section for failure to progress, 2.4 (95% CI, 2.0-3.0) for severe postpartum hemorrhage, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.9-2.8) for obstetric anal sphincter injury, 10.4 (95% CI, 8.6-12.6) for shoulder dystocia, 28.5 (95% CI, 8.9-90.7) for obstetric brachial plexus injury, 32.3 (95% CI, 3.8-278.2) for birth fractures and 4.4 (95% CI, 2.2-8.8) for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The respective values in pregnancies with severe macrosomia were 4.3 (95% CI, 3.1-6.1), 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.4), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.9-5.1), 28.7 (95% CI, 20.8-39.8), 73.9 (95% CI, 15.1-363.2), 87.2 (95% CI, 7.7-985.0) and 13.8 (95% CI, 5.2-36.8). CONCLUSION: Macrosomia is associated with serious adverse perinatal outcomes. This study provides accurate estimates of risks to aid in pregnancy management. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Complicaciones maternas y neonatales de la macrosomía fetal: estudio de cohorte OBJETIVO: Estimar los riesgos de complicaciones maternas y neonatales en embarazos con macrosomía. METHODS: Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo realizado en una unidad de maternidad de gran tamaño en el Reino Unido entre enero de 2009 y diciembre de 2016. La incidencia de complicaciones maternas y neonatales en los embarazos con macrosomía, definida como peso al nacer (PN) >4000 g, y en los embarazos con macrosomía grave, definida como PN >4500 g, se comparó con la de los embarazos con PN normal (2500-4000 g). Se realizó un análisis de regresión para determinar las razones de momios (RM) para las complicaciones en los embarazos macrosómicos en comparación con los que tenían un PN normal. RESULTADOS: La población estudiada de 35 548 embarazos incluyó 4522 (12,7%) casos con macrosomía, 643 (1,8%) con macrosomía grave y 31 026 (87,3%) con PN normal. En el grupo de macrosomía, la RM ajustada fue de 3,1 (IC 95%: 2,6-3,6) para la cesárea por no progresar, 2,4 (IC 95%: 2,0-3,0) para hemorragia posparto grave, 2,3 (IC 95%: 1,9-2,8) para la lesión obstétrica del esfínter anal, 10.4 (IC 95%, 8.6-12.6) para la distocia de hombro, 28.5 (IC 95%, 8.9-90.7) para la lesión obstétrica del plexo braquial, 32.3 (IC 95%, 3.8-278.2) para las fracturas de nacimiento y 4.4 (IC 95%, 2.2-8.8) para la encefalopatía hipóxica-isquémica. Los valores respectivos en los embarazos con macrosomía grave fueron 4,3 (IC 95%: 3,1-6,1), 2,9 (IC 95%: 1,9-4,4), 3,1 (IC 95%: 1,9-5,1), 28,7 (IC 95%: 20,8-39,8), 73,9 (IC 95%: 15,1-363,2), 87,2 (IC 95%: 7,7-985,0) y 13,8 (IC 95%: 5,2-36,8). CONCLUSIÓN: La macrosomía se asocia con resultados perinatales adversos graves. Este estudio proporciona estimaciones precisas de los riesgos para ayudar en el cuidado del embarazo.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Dystocia/etiology , Fetal Macrosomia , Postpartum Hemorrhage/etiology , Adult , Female , Fetal Macrosomia/physiopathology , Humans , Obstetric Labor Complications , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine accurate estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with fetal macrosomia by performing a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant studies reporting on maternal and/or neonatal complications in pregnancies with macrosomia having a birth weight (BW) > 4000 g and/or those with birth weight > 4500 g. Prospective and retrospective cohort and population-based studies that provided data regarding both cases and controls were included. Maternal outcomes assessed were emergency Cesarean section (CS), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). Neonatal outcomes assessed were shoulder dystocia, obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) and birth fractures. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to estimate weighted pooled estimates of summary statistics (odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI) for each complication, according to birth weight. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using Cochran's Q, I2 statistic and funnel plots. RESULTS: Seventeen studies reporting data on maternal and/or neonatal complications in pregnancy with macrosomia were included. In pregnancies with macrosomia having a BW > 4000 g, there was an increased risk of the maternal complications: emergency CS, PPH and OASIS, which had OR (95% CI) of 1.98 (1.80-2.18), 2.05 (1.90-2.22) and 1.91 (1.56-2.33), respectively. The corresponding values for pregnancies with BW > 4500 g were: 2.55 (2.33-2.78), 3.15 (2.14-4.63) and 2.56 (1.97-3.32). Similarly, in pregnancies with a BW > 4000 g, there was an increased risk of the neonatal complications: shoulder dystocia, OBPI and birth fractures, which had OR (95% CI) of 9.54 (6.76-13.46), 11.03 (7.06-17.23) and 6.43 (3.67-11.28), respectively. The corresponding values for pregnancies with a BW > 4500 g were: 15.64 (11.31-21.64), 19.87 (12.19-32.40) and 8.16 (2.75-24.23). CONCLUSION: Macrosomia is associated with serious maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. This study provides accurate estimates of these risks, which can be used for decisions on pregnancy management. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Complicaciones maternas y neonatales de la macrosomía fetal: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis OBJETIVO: Determinar estimaciones precisas de los riesgos de complicaciones maternas y neonatales en embarazos con macrosomía fetal mediante la realización de una revisión sistemática de la literatura y un metaanálisis. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL y The Cochrane Library para identificar estudios relevantes que informaron sobre complicaciones maternas y/o neonatales en embarazos con macrosomía con un peso al nacer (PN) >4000 g y/o aquellos con un peso al nacer >4500 g. Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes prospectivos y retrospectivos y estudios basados en la población que proporcionaron datos con respecto a los casos y controles. Las medidas maternas de resultados evaluadas fueron la cesárea de urgencia (CU), la hemorragia posparto (HPP) y la lesión obstétrica del esfínter anal (LOEA). Los resultados neonatales evaluados fueron distocia de hombro, lesión obstétrica del plexo braquial (LOPB) y fracturas de nacimiento. Se utilizó un metaanálisis con un modelo de efectos aleatorios para estimar las estimaciones agrupadas ponderadas de los estadísticos resumen (razones de momios [RM] y IC del 95%) para cada complicación, según el peso al nacer. La heterogeneidad entre estudios se estimó mediante la prueba estadística Q de Cochran, la prueba estadística I2 y gráficos de embudo. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 17 estudios que reportaron datos sobre las complicaciones maternas y/o neonatales en embarazos con macrosomía. En aquellos con un PN >4000 g, hubo un mayor riesgo de complicaciones maternas: CU, HPP y LOEA de urgencia, que tuvieron una RM (IC 95%) de 1,98 (1,80-2,18), 2,05 (1,90-2,22) y 1,91 (1,56-2,33), respectivamente. Los valores correspondientes para los embarazos con PN >4500 g fueron: 2,55 (2,33-2,78), 3,15 (2,14-4,63) y 2,56 (1,97-3,32). De manera similar, en los embarazos con un PN >4000 g, hubo un mayor riesgo de complicaciones neonatales: distocia de hombro, LOEA y fracturas de nacimiento, que tuvieron una RM (IC 95%) de 9,54 (6,76-13,46), 11,03 (7,06-17,23) y 6,43 (3,67-11,28), respectivamente. Los valores correspondientes para los embarazos con un PN >4500 g fueron: 15,64 (11,31-21,64), 19,87 (12,19-32,40) y 8,16 (2,75-24,23). CONCLUSIÓN: La macrosomía se asocia con resultados adversos maternos y neonatales graves. Este estudio proporciona estimaciones precisas de estos riesgos, que pueden utilizarse para tomar decisiones sobre el cuidado del embarazo.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Dystocia/etiology , Fetal Macrosomia/complications , Postpartum Hemorrhage/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article aims to compare the composite maternal and neonatal morbidities (CMM and CNM, respectively) between macrosomic (≥4,000 g) and nonmacrosomic (<4,000 g) newborns among women with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Maternal demographic and peripartum outcome data (N = 1,260) were collected from a retrospective cohort. CMM included chorioamnionitis/endometritis, wound infection, shoulder dystocia, eclampsia, pulmonary edema, admission for hypoglycemia, 3rd/4th degree perineal laceration, and death. CNM included 5-minute Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) score of <4, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III/IV, necrotizing enterocolitis stage II/III, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, seizures, hyperbilirubinemia, and death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 967 subjects, including 854 (88.3%) nonmacrosomic and 113 (11.7%) macrosomic infants. After adjustment, the risk of CMM was higher among macrosomic deliveries (aRR = 4.08, 95% CI = 2.45-6.80). The risk of CNM was also higher among macrosomic deliveries (aRR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.39-2.24). Macrosomia was associated with an increased risk in NICU admission, hypoglycemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. CONCLUSION: Among DM deliveries, macrosomia was associated with a fourfold higher risk of CMM and almost twofold higher risk of CNM.
Subject(s)
Fetal Macrosomia/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Adult , Dystocia/etiology , Female , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia/etiology , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Infant, Newborn , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Morbidity , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Texas/epidemiology , Young AdultSubject(s)
Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Bayes Theorem , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Dystocia/etiology , Dystocia/therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , ShoulderABSTRACT
Fetal malpositions and cephalic malpresentations are well-recognized causes of failure to progress in labor. They frequently require operative delivery, and are associated with an increased probability of fetal and maternal complications. Traditional obstetrics emphasizes the role of digital examinations, but recent studies demonstrated that this approach is inaccurate and intrapartum ultrasound is far more precise. The objective of this review is to summarize the current body of literature and provide recommendations to identify malpositions and cephalic malpresentations with ultrasound. We propose a systematic approach consisting of a combination of transabdominal and transperineal scans and describe the findings that allow an accurate diagnosis of normal and abnormal position, flexion, and synclitism of the fetal head. The management of malpositions and cephalic malpresentation is currently a matter of debate, and individualized depending on the general clinical picture and expertise of the provider. Intrapartum sonography allows a precise diagnosis and therefore offers the best opportunity to design prospective studies with the aim of establishing evidence-based treatment. The article is accompanied by a video that demonstrates the sonographic technique and findings.