Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 270
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Suisse ; 19(836): 1419-1425, 2023 Jul 26.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493119

ABSTRACT

Nail and fingertip injuries account for approximately 15 to 24% of hand injuries and are particularly frequent among young and active patients. Despite their prevalence they are often overlooked and considered as cosmetology. However, the nail unit involves complex anatomical structures that help to improve the sensitivity and fine motor skills of the fingers and protect the distal phalanx. If not treated correctly, these injuries can generate significant functional impairments. This article aims to present the most frequently encountered traumas, their anatomical and physiological involvement, and their management in the standard practice of the general practitioner.


Les traumatismes unguéaux et de l'extrémité des doigts représentent 15 à 24 % des lésions de la main et sont particulièrement fréquents chez les jeunes patients actifs. Malgré leur prévalence, ils sont souvent négligés et considérés comme de la cosmétologie. Or l'ongle et la partie distale du doigt comportent des structures anatomiques complexes qui participent à améliorer la sensibilité, la motricité fine et à protéger les phalanges distales. Les traumatismes de ces structures, s'ils ne sont pas pris en charge correctement, peuvent engendrer des séquelles fonctionnelles importantes. Cet article a pour but de présenter les traumatismes les plus fréquemment rencontrés, leur implication anatomique et physiologique ainsi que leur prise en charge dans la pratique courante de médecine de premier recours.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries , General Practitioners , Hand Injuries , Humans , Finger Injuries/diagnosis , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/etiology , Fingers , Nails
2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 88(1): 44-48, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34611095

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Data from the United States have shown that finger replantation numbers have declined significantly in recent years. It is unclear whether this is due to a decrease in amputation injuries or other reasons. MATERIALS METHODS: Since 2005, all German hospitals have been required to produce structured quality reports. Based on these reports, we analyzed finger and hand replantation development and the incidence of amputation injuries between 2006 and 2018. RESULTS: Replantations decreased by 30%, whereas amputation injuries increased slightly. In 2018, only 17 centers carried out more than 10 replantations. Most hospitals had replanted less than 4 times a year. The majority of residents participated in fewer than 1 replantation per year. Most specialists performed fewer than 1 replantation per year. The reasons for the decline in replantation remain speculative. CONCLUSIONS: However, a reduction in amputation injuries was not observed. A change in medical indications, technical skills, and economic motivations needs to be considered. A further loss of specialized technical skills and experience with replantations might be a future consequence of this trend.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic , Finger Injuries , Amputation, Surgical , Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Fingers/surgery , Humans , Replantation , United States
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(2): e776-e783, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34633779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fingertip injuries are among the most common hand injuries in children and result in significant health, time, and a financial burden. Nailbed injuries constitute a large proportion of fingertip injuries and are frequent in children. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the epidemiology, injury patterns, and treatment strategies implemented in patients with nailbed injuries between 0 and 18 years of age. We also wanted to identify various acute and chronic complications associated with nailbed injuries in these patients. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study carried out on the data collected between October 1, 2009, and October 31, 2019. RESULTS: We identified 457 patients with upper extremity nailbed injuries during the study period. Most children were male, accounting for 62.8% (287) of the patients. Door crush injuries (59.5%) resulted in the majority of the nailbed injuries. The commonest place of injury occurrence was home (46.4%), followed by playground (28.4%). The next most frequent areas were public areas (17.5%) and school (7.7%). Simple nailbed laceration with partial avulsion of the nail (44.4%) was the most common type of nailbed injury. Most nailbed injury repairs were done by the pediatric emergency doctor (72.2%). The predictors for the occurrence of complications after nailbed injury were the type of injury (stellate laceration and severe crushed nailbed injuries) and fracture of the distal phalanx. The predictors for the use of antibiotics after nailbed injury in our patients were the mechanism of injury (crushed in door, sports injury, and road traffic accident) and fracture of the distal phalanx. Age was found to be associated with subungual hematomas and avulsion, whereas female sex was found to be associated with crush injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most patients (72.2%) had their nailbed injuries repaired by pediatric emergency doctors. The commonest mechanism of nailbed injury was door crush injuries. Increased awareness and education of the caregivers might help avoid these injuries because the injury mechanism in most of the patients is preventable. Partial nail avulsion with underlying simple laceration of the nailbed was the most frequent type of nailbed injury seen. The complications that were seen after nailbed injuries were fingertip sensitivity (5.3%), split nail deformity (5.3%), infection (3.9%), nonadherence of the nail plate (2%), and hook nail deformity (1%). The predictors for the occurrence of complications after nailbed injury were the type of injury (stellate laceration and severe crushed nailbed injuries) and fracture of the distal phalanx. The predictors for the use of antibiotics after nailbed injury in our patients were the mechanism of injury (crushed in door, sports injury, and road traffic accident) and fracture of the distal phalanx. Age was found to be associated with subungual hematomas and avulsion, whereas female sex was found to be associated with crush injuries. Possessing a robust understanding of the mechanism of injury and the underlying anatomy with a detailed assessment of the nailbed injury is of paramount importance in the management of these patients. An initial thorough assessment and meticulous repair of the nailbed injuries will result in good outcomes with overall few complications.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic , Finger Injuries , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Humans , Male , Nails/injuries , Retrospective Studies
4.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(11): 582-588, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36173335

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The hands and fingers are frequently injured among children. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the epidemiological characteristics of hand and finger injuries among Japanese children and identify preventive strategies. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of data of pediatric patients who visited the Kitakyushu City Yahata Hospital in Japan, between April 2018 and March 2019. All patients 15 years or younger who experienced hand and finger trauma were included. Data on age, sex, injured part, location of the incident, mechanism of injury, objects, diagnosis, consultation with specialists, treatments, and outcomes were collected and analyzed by classifying the participants based on age into the following 5 age groups: younger than 1, 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 years. RESULTS: A total of 554 patients were included in this study (male, 57.2%; median age, 4.5 years). The most commonly injured part of the hand was the index finger (22.4%), followed by the middle (18.9%) and ring (16.8%) fingers. A total of 111 patients (15.1%) had palm or dorsal hand injuries. Burn by touching hot objects at home was the leading cause of injuries to the palms during infancy, whereas door-related contusion and abrasion of the index, middle, and ring fingers were most common in preschool children. Sports-related fingertip fractures and sprains most frequently occurred in the thumb and little fingers of school children. Approximately half of the patients (53.3%) did not require any specific treatment. Most patients (98.2%) were treated at the outpatient department. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the epidemiology of age-specific hand and finger injuries among Japanese children. Therefore, the childhood hand and finger injury prevention strategy should focus on age as a characteristic.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries , Fractures, Bone , Hand Injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries , Child, Preschool , Child , Humans , Male , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/complications , Japan/epidemiology , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(15): 857-864, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33036996

ABSTRACT

Climbing as a competition sport has become increasingly popular in recent years, particularly the sub-discipline of bouldering. The sport will debut in the Tokyo Summer Olympic Games. National and international competitions have three disciplines: lead (climbing with rope protection), bouldering (climbing at lower heights with mattress floor protection) and speed (maximum speed climbing on a standardised route in 1-on-1 mode). There is also a 'combined mode' of all three disciplines (combined) which forms the Olympic competition format; all competition formats are held on artificial walls. Existing literature describes a predominantly low injury frequency and severity in elite climbing. In comparison to climbing on real rock, artificial climbing walls have recently been associated with higher injury rates. Finger injuries such as tenosynovitis, pulley lesions and growth plate injuries are the most common injuries. As finger injuries are sport-specific, medical supervision of climbing athletes requires specific medical knowledge for diagnosis and treatment. There is so far little evidence on effective injury prevention measures in top athletes, and antidoping measures, in general, requiring further work in this field. An improved data situation regarding high-performance climbing athletes is crucial to ensure that the sport continues to be largely safe and injury-free and to prevent doping cases as extensively as possible.


Subject(s)
Mountaineering/injuries , Adolescent , Age Factors , Doping in Sports/legislation & jurisprudence , Doping in Sports/prevention & control , Female , Finger Injuries/diagnosis , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Mountaineering/classification , Mountaineering/statistics & numerical data , Mountaineering/trends , Salter-Harris Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tenosynovitis/diagnosis , Tenosynovitis/etiology , Tenosynovitis/therapy , Upper Extremity/injuries , Young Adult
6.
J Orthop Sci ; 26(2): 271-275, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Japan, microsurgical skill development and a system to transfer patients to an appropriate hospital for upper extremity amputation have been promoted; however, information about trends of replantation is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the trends in the treatment for upper extremity amputation using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB). METHODS: Data derived from JTDB (2004-2015) were used to quantify trends in the volume of replantation for upper extremity amputation including finger amputation. Trauma was diagnosed based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale code; a subgroup of patients who underwent replantation was delineated. We investigated patient demographics, infection rate, and characteristics of treating facilities. RESULTS: A total of 1240 patients underwent upper extremity amputation. Among these, 510 (41.1%) underwent replantation, and the rate of replantation did not change over the study period. The average age of patients who underwent or did not undergo replantation was 45.5 and 47.2 years, respectively. The proportion of the patients who were transferred to another hospital for treatment significantly decreased between 2004 (28.5%) and 2015 (16.3%) (P < 0.01). Time taken for transfer from the accident site to hospitals increased. The rate of patients who underwent replantation differed among different hospitals; however, higher-volume hospitals were more likely to perform replantation. CONCLUSION: The rate of patients transferred to another hospital decreased between 2004 and 2015; however, the rate of patients who underwent replantation remained unchanged. This suggests that the number of patients who were transported directly from the accident site to an appropriate hospital has increased, whereas the indication for care in each hospital remains unchanged. Common criteria for amputations are needed to address the differing rates of replantation among hospitals.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic , Finger Injuries , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Replantation , Upper Extremity/surgery
7.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 32(4): 450-456, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538713

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Experienced high-level climbers are subject to a number of bone and soft tissue changes over the years and are also among the most exposed to pulley injuries. One of the main consequences of pulley rupture is the separation of the flexor tendons from the subjacent phalanges, also known as bowstringing. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this population has asymptomatic bowstringing of the A2 and/or A4 pulleys as determined by tendon-bone distance (TBD) values when compared to nonclimbers. METHODS: High-resolution ultrasound TBD measurements in active forced flexion were made for the A2 and A4 pulley of the ring finger bilaterally. Participants were 21 asymptomatic sport climbers who had 21 consecutive years of climbing at a level above 9.66 in the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation difficulty metric scale. Control subjects were 21 age-matched nonclimbers. RESULTS: A significantly longer TBD-25% (0.3 mm) and 35% (0.4 mm) for the A2 and A4 pulleys, respectively-was found in the experienced climbers group (experienced climbers group: A2 1.6±0.5 mm and A4 1.6±0.4 mm; nonclimbers group: A2 1.2±0.1 mm and A4 1.2±0.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that bowstringing of A2 and A4 pulleys occurs in asymptomatic experienced high-level climbers, which could be interpreted as either an adaptive mechanism to workloads endured over years of climbing or a consequence of underdiagnosed pulley ruptures.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries , Tendon Injuries , Adaptation, Physiological , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/etiology , Humans , Rupture , Tendon Injuries/epidemiology , Tendon Injuries/etiology , Tendons
8.
Acta Chir Plast ; 63(3): 113-117, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34814692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fingertips are the most commonly injured anatomical structures in the upper extremity. The aim of this work is to present our experience in the management of fingertip injuries. METHODS: All patients with fingertip injuries managed by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division of Hospital General “Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez” in Mexico from July 2010 to June 2015 were included; their demographic characteristics were described, as well as patterns of injury and management. RESULTS: A total of 1,265 patients were included in the study, 75% were males. The mean age of presentation was 20.5 ± 16.46 years; the age group most commonly affected was younger than 15 years (46.7%). Right and left-sided injuries were almost equally prevalent (51 vs. 49%). The most commonly injured fingers were the third (27.2%), and second (25.8%). Eighty-seven percent of the patients presented with single-digit injuries. Fingertip amputations were the most common type of injury with 620 cases (49%), followed by simple fingertip lacerations (574 cases, 45%), and nail bed injuries in 71 cases (5.6%). Surgical management was necessary in 95.8% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Fingertip injuries remain the most common reason for consultation in hand emergencies. A structured approach for their treatment is necessary to obtain the best clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries , Hand , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Hand/surgery , Humans , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation , Young Adult
9.
J Hand Surg Am ; 45(11): 1086.e1-1086.e11, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698980

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment for upper extremity amputations includes revision amputation or attempted replantation. The rate of digital replantation has been declining in the United States. Prior studies discovered the presence of socioeconomic disparities associated with these injuries. The goals of this study were to investigate yearly trends of traumatic upper extremity amputations and evaluate the presence of disparities with access to care in these injuries. METHODS: The 2008 to 2014 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) inpatient and outpatient databases were utilized to identify patients who had traumatic upper extremity amputations. We queried the database for patient characteristics, resource utilization characteristics, insurance status, major in-hospital complications, and mortality. Patients at low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions were compared. We performed multivariable logistic regressions for the binary variable replantation (yes/no) controlling for age, sex, race, insurance status, amputation level, admission hour, and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 patients met our inclusion criteria: 92.1% sustained digital amputations and 7.9% sustained arm amputations. The annual rate of inpatient finger amputations decreased significantly (1.9 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 1.4 per 100,000 people in 2014) during the study period while that of outpatient finger amputations increased significantly (12.0 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 15.5 per 100,000 people in 2014). Multivariable analysis demonstrated incrementally lower odds for replantation with increasing age and increased odds for replantation in patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.50). The number of replantation surgeries at medium-volume institutions decreased by 45% while remaining steady in low- and high-volume institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings corroborate the findings of other studies that underscore the existence of disparities with respect to insurance status in these injuries. Replantations occur more frequently at high-volume hospitals and are more common in younger patients with private insurance. This finding suggests that patients with traumatic amputations may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve access to such institutions is warranted. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic , Finger Injuries , Amputation, Surgical , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Fingers , Humans , New York , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Upper Extremity/injuries , Upper Extremity/surgery
10.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 140(10): 1575-1583, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32797296

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment of ring avulsion injuries is still challenging. This study provides data concerning epidemiology and factors influencing finger survival rate. We wanted to answer the question whether microsurgical advancement and a high level of surgical expertise nowadays may improve the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 11/2007 and 06/2016 95 ring avulsions were treated (classified according to Kay). Complete documentation was available from 87 patients (25 female). The mean age was 34 (4-82) years. Intact perfusion (Kay I) was preoperatively seen in 20 fingers while 67 were avascular (Kay II-IV). RESULTS: In 89%, the ring finger was injured during mainly private accidents. Primary amputation was performed in 38 Kay II-IV injuries. Revascularization was applied to 29 fingers while 8 of them (28%) primarily failed. After initially successful revascularization/replantation of 21 fingers, 6 had to be amputated secondarily (success rate: 52%). There was no significant correlation between affected finger and rate of finger preservation. Climbing over a fence as trauma mechanism significantly correlated with lower finger preservation rates and higher incidence of Kay IV injuries. CONCLUSION: Despite microsurgical advances and high levels of surgical expertise the finger survival rate after ring avulsion injuries still seems to be mostly influenced by the extend of intrinsic damage.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/surgery , Fingers/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Sparing Treatments , Replantation , Young Adult
11.
Orthopade ; 48(12): 1005-1012, 2019 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sport climbing is rapidly becoming a popular trend sport, which has resulted in a surge of climbing-specific injuries. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this paper is to delineate the incidence of climbing-specific injuries focusing on finger and shoulder injuries. Furthermore, we aim to illustrate clinical symptoms and therapeutic strategies based on the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidence of climbing-specific injuries in a large patient population was recorded and diagnosis and treatment options were assessed considering the current literature. RESULTS: Finger and shoulder injuries are the most common entities in sport climbing. With regard to finger injuries, more than 30 different differential diagnoses were identified, with pulley injuries, tenosynovitis, epiphyseal fractures, as well as lumbrical muscle tears being of the greatest importance due to their climbing-specific nature. With regard to shoulder injuries, SLAP lesions play a particularly important role, currently representing the fifth most common diagnosis in the patient population analyzed. Further pathologies that are becoming increasingly important among sport climbers are injuries of the rotator cuff, long biceps tendon ruptures, impingement syndromes and injuries caused by shoulder dislocations (e.g. Bankart lesions). CONCLUSIONS: Finger injuries are common in sports climbing and can be challenging to diagnose and treat correctly. The number of shoulder injuries is expected to rise as new competition modalities and sub-disciplines (e.g. bouldering) increasingly stress athletes' musculoskeletal systems. An increase of degenerative injuries in long-time climbers is expected due to changes in the sport.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Finger Injuries/diagnosis , Mountaineering/injuries , Shoulder Injuries/diagnosis , Sports , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Shoulder Injuries/epidemiology , Tendon Injuries/epidemiology
12.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(8): 1455-1458, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Work-related injuries are commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). This study sought to analyze characteristics of ED patient visits that were billed under workers' compensation. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of visits during 2015 that were billed under workers' compensation at an academic ED. The following variables were collected: age, gender, mechanism of injury/exposure, diagnoses, imaging performed, specialty consultation, operative requirement, follow-up specialty, and ED disposition. RESULTS: In 2015, 377 patients presented to the ED for work-related injuries. The most common mechanism of injury was fall. Frequent diagnoses included lower extremity injuries and hand/finger injuries. The most common consulting service was orthopedics. Only five patients were referred to occupational medicine for follow up. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the types of occupational injuries and subsequent care required may help guide both workers and employers how to best triage patients within the healthcare system. Alternative settings such as occupational medicine or primary care services may be appropriate for some patients.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Humans , Lower Extremity/injuries , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Injuries/classification , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , West Virginia/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
J Hand Surg Am ; 43(10): 903-912.e1, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30286850

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Traumatic digit amputations have an adverse impact on patients' daily living. Despite experts advocating for digit replantation, studies have shown a continued decrease in rate of replantation. We performed a national-level investigation to examine the recent trend of practice for digital replantation. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample database under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to select adult patients with traumatic digit amputation from 2001 to 2014. We calculated the rate of attempted and rate of successful digit replantation per year, subcategorizing for digit type (thumb or finger) and for hospital type (rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching). We also analyzed the pattern of distribution of case volume to each hospital type per year. We used 2 multivariable logistic regression models to investigate patient demographic and hospital characteristics associated with the odds of replantation attempt and success. RESULTS: Among the 14,872 adult patients with a single digit amputation from 2001 to 2014, only 1,670 (11.2%) underwent replantation. The rate of replantation attempt trended down over the years for both thumb and finger injuries at all hospital types, despite increasing proportions of cases being sent to urban teaching hospitals where they were more than twice as likely to undergo replantation. The rate of successful replantation stayed stable for the thumb at 82.9% and increased for fingers from 76.1% to 82.4% over the years. Patients were more likely to undergo replantation if they had private insurance or a higher level of income. Neither hospital case volume nor hospital type was predictive of successful replantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although more single-digit amputations were treated by urban teaching hospitals with higher likelihood to replant, the downward trend in rate of attempt regardless of hospital type demonstrates that concentration of case volume is not the solution to reverse the declining trend. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Financial aspects of digit replantation need to be considered from both the patients' and the surgeons' perspectives to improve delivery of care for digit replantation.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/surgery , Fingers/surgery , Replantation/trends , Adult , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Hospitals, Rural/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Replantation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
14.
J Hand Surg Am ; 43(11): 1040.e1-1040.e11, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735290

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Primary revision amputation is the most common treatment method for traumatic digit amputations in the United States. Few studies have reported secondary revision rates after primary revision amputation. The primary aim of our study was to identify risk factors for secondary revision within 1 year of the index procedure. Secondarily, we describe the incidence and timing of complications requiring secondary revision. METHODS: Our institution's emergency department (ED) database was reviewed for traumatic digit amputations over a 6-year period. Patients were reviewed for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, site of treatment (ED versus operating room), and complications requiring secondary revision. Conditional Cox Proportional Hazard regression was used to model hazard of revision within 1 year of index procedure relative to site of initial management, mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and patient demographics. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-seven patients with 677 digits were managed with primary revision amputation. Five hundred and eighty-six digits (86.6%) were revised in the ED, and 91 (13.4%) in the operating room. Ninety-one digits required secondary revision, including 83 within 1 year. No increased risk of secondary revision amputation within 1 year of the index procedure was observed for patients treated in the ED compared with the operating room. Relative to crush injuries, bite and sharp laceration amputations had 4.8 times and 2.6 times increased risk of secondary revision, respectively. The index finger had a 5.3-fold increased risk of revision with the thumb as the reference digit. Work-related injuries had a 1.9-fold increased risk of secondary revision compared with non-work-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found indicating that traumatic digit amputations primarily revised in the ED had an increased risk of secondary revision. Patients may be counseled on the risk of secondary procedures based on the mechanism of injury, injury characteristics and demographics, as well as the timing of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Finger Injuries/surgery , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Crush Injuries/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Replantation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rhode Island/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
15.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 17(11): 396-401, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407948

ABSTRACT

Competition climbing will debut as an Olympic sport at the 2020 summer games in Tokyo. The aim of this article is to critically review research on the incidence of injury in sport climbing and bouldering. The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of finger and shoulder injuries is discussed. A semisystematic approach in reviewing literature on incidence was applied. Articles were identified after searches of the following electronic databases: Discover, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect. Despite methodological shortcomings of the included studies, we estimated the mean ± SD of the incidence rate of injury in sport climbing and bouldering from the eight studies to be 2.71 ± 4.49/1000 h. Differential diagnosis and the clinical management of finger and shoulder injuries in climbers are challenging. An updated diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the clinical management of finger injuries in climbers is presented.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Mountaineering/injuries , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Shoulder Injuries/epidemiology
16.
Am J Emerg Med ; 35(6): 893-898, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28325679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the epidemiology of lawn mower-related injuries to children in the US. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of children younger than 18years of age treated in US emergency departments for a lawn mower-related injury from 1990 through 2014 using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. RESULTS: An estimated 212,258 children <18years of age received emergency treatment for lawn mower-related injuries from 1990 through 2014, equaling an average annual rate of 11.9 injuries per 100,000 US children. The annual injury rate decreased by 59.9% during the 25-year study period. The leading diagnosis was a laceration (38.5%) and the most common body region injured was the hand/finger (30.7%). Struck by (21.2%), cut by (19.9%), and contact with a hot surface (14.1%) were the leading mechanisms of injury. Patients <5years old were more likely (RR 7.01; 95% CI: 5.69-8.64) to be injured from contact with a hot surface than older patients. A projectile was associated with 49.8% of all injuries among patients injured as bystanders. Patients injured as passengers or bystanders were more likely (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.74-5.19) to be admitted to the hospital than lawnmower operators. CONCLUSIONS: Lawn mower-related injuries continue to be a cause of serious morbidity among children. Although the annual injury rate decreased significantly over the study period, the number of injuries is still substantial, indicating the need for additional prevention efforts. In addition to educational approaches, opportunities exist for improvements in mower design and lawn mower safety standards.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Home/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Safety , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Household Articles , Lacerations/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Finger Injuries/etiology , Humans , Infant , Lacerations/etiology , Linear Models , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States
17.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 333, 2017 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28768502

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both acute and overuse injuries are common among recreational volleyball players, especially finger/wrist, ankle, shoulder and knee injuries. Consequently, an intervention ('VolleyVeilig') was developed to prevent or reduce the occurrence of finger/wrist, shoulder, knee and ankle injuries among recreational volleyball players. This article describes the design of a study evaluating the effectiveness of the developed intervention on the one-season occurrence of finger/wrist, shoulder, knee and ankle injuries among recreational adult volleyball players. METHODS: A randomized prospective controlled trial with a follow-up period of one volleyball season will be conducted. Participants will be healthy recreational adult volleyball players (18 years of age or older) practicing volleyball (training and/or match) at least twice a week. The intervention ('VolleyVeilig') consists of a warm-up program based on more than 50 distinct exercises (with different variations and levels). The effect of the intervention programme on the occurrence of injuries will be compared to volleyball as usual. Outcome measures will be incidence of acute injury (expressed as number of injuries per 1000 h of play) and prevalence of overuse injuries (expressed as percentage). DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first randomized prospective controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention on the occurrence of both acute and overuse injuries among recreational adult volleyball players. Outcome of this study could possibly lead to the nationwide implementation of the intervention in all volleyball clubs in The Netherlands, ultimately resulting in less injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registration NTR6202 , registered February 1st 2017. PROTOCOL: Version 3, February 2017.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Games, Recreational/injuries , Volleyball/injuries , Warm-Up Exercise , Adult , Ankle Injuries/epidemiology , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/prevention & control , Follow-Up Studies , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Incidence , Knee Injuries/epidemiology , Knee Injuries/prevention & control , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Shoulder Injuries/epidemiology , Shoulder Injuries/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Wrist Injuries/epidemiology , Wrist Injuries/prevention & control
18.
Ann Emerg Med ; 67(3): 307-315.e8, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452720

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Epinephrine autoinjector use for anaphylaxis is increasing. There are reports of digit injections because of incorrect autoinjector use, but no previous reports of lacerations, to our knowledge. We report complications of epinephrine autoinjector use in children and discuss features of these devices, and their instructions for use, and how these may contribute to injuries. METHODS: We queried emergency medicine e-mail discussion lists and social media allergy groups to identify epinephrine autoinjector injuries involving children. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of epinephrine autoinjector-related injuries are described. Twenty-one occurred during intentional use for the child's allergic reaction. Seventeen children experienced lacerations. In 4 cases, the needle stuck in the child's limb. In 1 case, the device lacerated a nurse's finger. The device associated with the injury was operated by health care providers (6 cases), the patient's parent (12 cases, including 2 nurses), educators (3 cases), and the patient (1 case). Of the 3 epinephrine autoinjectors currently available in North America, none include instructions to immobilize the child's leg. Only 1 has a needle that self-retracts; the others have needles that remain in the thigh during the 10 seconds that the user is instructed to hold the device against the leg. Instructions do not caution against reinjection if the needle is dislodged during these 10 seconds. CONCLUSION: Epinephrine autoinjectors are lifesaving devices in the management of anaphylaxis. However, some have caused lacerations and other injuries in children. Minimizing needle injection time, improving device design, and providing instructions to immobilize the leg before use may decrease the risk of these injuries.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Finger Injuries/etiology , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Lacerations/etiology , Leg Injuries/etiology , Needlestick Injuries/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design/adverse effects , Equipment Safety , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Injections, Intramuscular/adverse effects , Lacerations/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Male , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Self Administration/adverse effects , Social Media
20.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 26(7): 739-44, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26105683

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the protective mechanisms or risk factors that can be related to the occurrence of hand climbing-related injuries (CRIH ). CRIH (tendon, pulley, muscle, and joint injuries) were retrospectively screened in 528 adult climbers. The questionnaire contained anthropometric items (e.g., body mass index - BMI), as well as items regarding climbing and basic training activities (warm-up, cool-down and session durations, number of session per week, hydration, practice level, climbing surface, and duration of the cardiovascular training). Higher skilled climbers and climbers with BMI above 21 kg/m(2) were more likely to have experienced CRIH (P < 0.01). Climbers with BMI above 20 kg/m(2) were more likely to have tendon injuries while those with a BMI above 21 kg/m(2) were more likely to have pulley injuries (P < 0.01). Skilled climbers, who climb more difficult routes, may use smaller grip size and a reduced number of fingers. Higher BMI will require a higher force to climb. Both high level and elevated BMI may increase the demands to the hands and fingers leading to CRIH . These risk factors are difficult to address as we cannot recommend the climbers to climb easier routes and decrease their BMI below 20 kg/m(2) .


Subject(s)
Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Hand Joints/injuries , Mountaineering/injuries , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Tendon Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cool-Down Exercise , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Joint , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Warm-Up Exercise , Water-Electrolyte Balance , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL