Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 443
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(10): 939-946, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865980

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing prevalence of fruit and vegetable allergies in childhood over the past decades, the clinical course of reaction types and tolerance remain unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical course, demographic characteristics, and tolerance rate of allergic reactions induced by fruits or vegetables. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study on patients who presented with suspected allergic reactions to fruit or vegetables. We used patient records to identify demographic data, skin prick test, prick-to-prick test, and oral food challenge test results and laboratory findings. RESULTS: The study included 78 children with a median age of 61.5 months. Class 1 and 2 allergies were found in 65 and 13 cases, respectively. The most common allergens were potato (21.8%), banana (15.4%), peach (14.1%), and tomato (12.8%). Clinical symptoms included urticaria (75.6%), oral allergy syndrome (15.4%), angioedema (7.7%), and anaphylaxis (1.3%). Thirteen children achieved tolerance, while 61.7% did not. The median time to tolerance was 13.5 months after diagnosis, with a minimum of 9 months. Significant differences in reaction type, clinical presentation, pan-allergy to aeroallergens, and serum total IgE levels were found between the tolerant and non-tolerant groups (p = 0.006, 0.009, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to provide guidance on the tolerance rate and resolution time of fruit and vegetable allergies based on demographic and diagnostic parameters. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of fruit and vegetable allergy.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Food Hypersensitivity , Fruit , Immune Tolerance , Vegetables , Humans , Vegetables/immunology , Fruit/immunology , Fruit/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Allergens/immunology , Skin Tests , Infant , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): e31-e37, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982605

ABSTRACT

Background: Fruit allergy usually presents with mild-to-moderate symptoms but serious systemic reactions, e.g., anaphylaxis, may also occur. Objective: This study aimed to examine the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with fruit allergy and fruit-induced anaphylaxis. Methods: Patients diagnosed with fruit allergy at Diskapi Hematology and Oncology Hospital and Bilkent City Hospital between January 2017 and January 2023 were included in the study. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis was made according to the European Allergy and Clinical Immunology Anaphylaxis Guideline. Results: During the study period, skin-prick tests with food allergens were performed on 9432 patients in our clinic, and fruit allergy was detected in 78 patients (0.82%). Five patients with inaccessible medical records were excluded from the study. 40 (54.8%) were boys. The median (interquartile range) age at the onset of symptoms was 72 months (12.5-144 months). Sixty-eight of the patients (93.2%) had a concomitant allergic disease, the most common of which was allergic rhinitis (n = 48 [65.8%]). The 73 patients had a history of reaction to 126 fruits. Twenty-five patients (19.8%) were allergic to multiple fruits. The most common fruit allergen was banana (22/126 [17.4%]), followed by peach (18/126 [14.2%]) and kiwi (17/126 [13.5%]). Mucocutaneous findings were observed most frequently after fruit consumption (120/126 [95.2%]). Anaphylaxis occurred in 17 patients (23.2%) with 21 fruits.The fruits most commonly associated with anaphylaxis were banana (6/21 [28.6%]) and kiwi (6/21 [28.6%]). Conclusion: Fruit allergy generally presents with mild symptoms, e.g., oral allergy syndrome, but severe systemic symptoms, e.g., anaphylaxis, can also be observed. Kiwi and banana are the fruits that most commonly cause anaphylaxis. Although more comprehensive studies are needed to comment on the development of tolerance, especially in patients with anaphylaxis, responsible fruit avoidance is still the most important strategy.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Fruit , Skin Tests , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Male , Female , Child , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Fruit/adverse effects , Fruit/immunology , Child, Preschool , Allergens/immunology , Infant , Adolescent
3.
Arerugi ; 73(4): 347-352, 2024.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880634

ABSTRACT

Gibberellin-regulated protein (GRP) is a newly discovered allergen in systemic fruit allergies. The kind of fruits which cause allergy is extensive as GRP is universally included in plants. Two children with GRP allergy were reported. Case 1: A 6-year-old boy experienced anaphylaxis while running after school lunch, which included canned peaches. A skin prick test (SPT) and blood examination suggested that he had peach GRP allergy. Six months and three years later, he experienced a similar episode after eating apple and citrus flesh, respectively. Case 2: An 11-year-old boy experienced anaphylaxis while running after consuming canned peaches during school lunch. A SPT implied that he had peach GRP allergy. However, a similar episode occurred after eating strawberry flesh 18 months later.Patients with GRP allergy often have one or more allergies to fruits other than peaches, as in these cases, and relevant fruits differ depending on the case. Particularly, clinicians should recognize that apple and citrus fruits are frequently included in school lunches as fruit flesh and as flavoring or seasoning in ready-made sauces or dressings. Therefore, an appropriate removal strategy should be considered in school lunches depending on each case of GRP allergy.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Fruit , Child , Male , Humans , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Fruit/immunology , Schools , Plant Proteins/immunology , Lunch , Allergens/immunology , Skin Tests
4.
J Exp Bot ; 72(7): 2696-2709, 2021 03 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33462583

ABSTRACT

The increased susceptibility of ripe fruit to fungal pathogens poses a substantial threat to crop production and marketability. Here, we coupled transcriptomic analyses with mutant studies to uncover critical processes associated with defense and susceptibility in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Using unripe and ripe fruit inoculated with three fungal pathogens, we identified common pathogen responses reliant on chitinases, WRKY transcription factors, and reactive oxygen species detoxification. We established that the magnitude and diversity of defense responses do not significantly impact the interaction outcome, as susceptible ripe fruit mounted a strong immune response to pathogen infection. Then, to distinguish features of ripening that may be responsible for susceptibility, we utilized non-ripening tomato mutants that displayed different susceptibility patterns to fungal infection. Based on transcriptional and hormone profiling, susceptible tomato genotypes had losses in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis, while jasmonic acid accumulation and signaling coincided with defense activation in resistant fruit. We identified and validated a susceptibility factor, pectate lyase (PL). CRISPR-based knockouts of PL, but not polygalacturonase (PG2a), reduced susceptibility of ripe fruit by >50%. This study suggests that targeting specific genes that promote susceptibility is a viable strategy to improve the resistance of tomato fruit against fungal disease.


Subject(s)
Plant Diseases , Plant Immunity , Solanum lycopersicum , Botrytis , Fruit/immunology , Fruit/microbiology , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Solanum lycopersicum/genetics , Solanum lycopersicum/immunology , Solanum lycopersicum/microbiology , Plant Diseases/immunology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/metabolism
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(12): 1194-1199, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gibberellin-regulated proteins (GRPs, Peamaclein) are allergens recently identified in plant-derived food allergy (FA), and little is known about the clinical manifestations of this allergic condition in the European population, especially in children. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to identify and characterize pediatric patients with pollen-FA due to GRP sensitization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients referred to the Allergy Unit of the Meyer Children's Hospital in Florence for suspected FA. Three main eligibility criteria based on the actual knowledge of GRP allergy were used to select patients deserving further investigations: (1) systemic reactions after consumption of fruit or an unknown culprit food, (2) positive skin prick tests to both cypress pollen and Pru p 3-enriched peach peel extracts, (3) negative in vitro test results for Pru p 3 serum-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE). We performed the in vitro test to determine the anti-rPru p 7 (Peamaclein) sIgE levels in the selected patients. RESULTS: We identified 10 pediatric patients with Pru p 7 allergy and described their characteristics. The use of our eligibility criteria showed a high accuracy in identifying these patients: 100% of the selected patients had positive in vitro results for Pru p 7. We therefore proposed a diagnostic algorithm for Pru p 7 allergy. CONCLUSION: This is the first case series of European pediatric patients with a demonstrated Peamaclein allergy. These findings broaden our knowledge on GRP allergy in pediatric populations and could help clinicians to suspect, diagnose, and manage this recently discovered plant-derived FA.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Fruit/adverse effects , Gibberellins/immunology , Plant Proteins/immunology , Prunus persica/adverse effects , Adolescent , Algorithms , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Decision Rules , Cross Reactions , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Fruit/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Pollen/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Prunus persica/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests
6.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(1): 129-132, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641286

ABSTRACT

Routine diagnostic methods for allergies to plant-derived foods are based on skin prick test (SPT) with commercial extracts, prick-by-prick (PbP) with fresh food, serum-specific IgE measurement, and oral food challenge.We discuss the possibility and the advantages of performing, in patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) by fruit and vegetables (excluding nuts) PR-10 allergy, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) by SPT and PbP with raw and cooked vegetables, rather than performing a CRD with in vitro tests by drawing blood.Based on our clinical experience and the studies published in the literature, we believe that, at least for the OAS by fruit and vegetables (excluding nuts) PR-10 allergy, the search for sensitizing allergens and related cross-reactive allergens with SPT and PbP can be performed routinely in clinical practice, even at the primary-care level.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Fruit/adverse effects , Plant Proteins, Dietary/adverse effects , Vegetables/adverse effects , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/immunology , Child , Cross Reactions , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Fruit/immunology , Humans , Plant Proteins, Dietary/administration & dosage , Plant Proteins, Dietary/immunology , Skin Tests , Vegetables/immunology
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(7)2021 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33805442

ABSTRACT

About 50-70% of patients allergic to birch pollen suffer from sensitization after apple ingestion. Apple allergenicity was established in only few varieties. Studies were performed on apple fruits of 21 traditional and nine modern varieties organically, intensively, or integratively produced. The aim of the study was to assess whether the factors like cultivation method, maturity stage, genotype, or type of tissue place an impact on the allergenic potential of apples. To answer these questions, we used semiquantitative real-time PCR, ELISA, and immunoblotting. Apple allergen genes present divergent expression across apple cultivars. Expression of the Mal d 1.06A correlates with the Mal d 1 level and is affected by the cultivation method and maturity of the fruit. The content of the main allergen Mal d 1 varied widely across cultivars. Interestingly, in our study, the Gala variety presented a low Mal d 1 concentration regardless of the cultivation method. Based on the Mal d 1.06A expression, the Mal d 1 protein content, and the immunoreactivity assay, the Kandil Sinap, Kosztela, Rumianka from Alma-Ata, Kantówka Gdanska, Reinette Coulon, and Gala cultivars emerged as potentially hypoallergenic apple cultivars. Our study allowed distinguishing between potentially low, medium, and highly allergenic varieties.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Malus/genetics , Malus/immunology , Plant Proteins/immunology , Antigens, Plant/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fruit/genetics , Fruit/immunology , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Humans , Immune Sera , Immunoblotting , Plant Proteins/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Principal Component Analysis
8.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(23)2021 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34884527

ABSTRACT

Sulfur has been previously reported to modulate plant growth and exhibit significant anti-microbial activities. However, the mechanism underlying its diverse effects on plant pathogens has not been elucidated completely. The present study conducted the two-year field experiment of sulfur application to control kiwifruit canker from 2017 to 2018. For the first time, our study uncovered activation of plant disease resistance by salicylic acid after sulfur application in kiwifruit. The results indicated that when the sulfur concentration was 1.5-2.0 kg m-3, the induced effect of kiwifruit canker reached more than 70%. Meanwhile, a salicylic acid high lever was accompanied by the decline of jasmonic acid. Further analysis revealed the high expression of the defense gene, especially AcPR-1, which is a marker of the salicylic acid signaling pathway. Additionally, AcICS1, another critical gene of salicylic acid synthesis, was also highly expressed. All contributed to the synthesis of increasing salicylic acid content in kiwifruit leaves. Moreover, the first key lignin biosynthetic AcPAL gene was marked up-regulated. Thereafter, accumulation of lignin content in the kiwifruit stem and the higher deposition of lignin were visible in histochemical analysis. Moreover, the activity of the endochitinase activity of kiwifruit leaves increased significantly. We suggest that the sulfur-induced resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae via salicylic activates systemic acquired resistance to enhance plant immune response in kiwifruit.


Subject(s)
Actinidia/immunology , Disease Resistance/immunology , Fruit/immunology , Plant Diseases/immunology , Pseudomonas syringae/physiology , Salicylic Acid/metabolism , Sulfur/pharmacology , Actinidia/drug effects , Actinidia/growth & development , Actinidia/metabolism , Disease Resistance/drug effects , Fruit/drug effects , Fruit/growth & development , Fruit/metabolism , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Signal Transduction
9.
J Sci Food Agric ; 101(6): 2380-2388, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A promising way to overcome the susceptibility of Vitis vinifera L. to fungal diseases is the integration of genetic resistance by the interspecific crossing between V. vinifera varieties and resistant species. However, the products of such hybrids are still not accepted by customers, particularly due to their organoleptic characteristics, not least influenced by their polyphenolic profile. RESULTS: A total of 58 resistant breeding lines, 41 from international programs and 17 new progeny individuals, were grown in one untreated vineyard to exclude any variances by climatic and pedologic conditions or vineyard practice. A total of 60 polyphenols (including acids, anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and stilbenoids) were determined in grapevine berries by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in two consecutive years. The overall profiles were rather consistent (variation P > 0.05) within the two harvests, with the exceptions of epicatechin and caftaric acid. Anthocyanin diglucosides were found in ten of the red breeding lines, malvidin-3,5-O-diglucoside being predominant in nine of them. Total polyphenol content of the unknown progeny individuals and international breeding lines was comparable, with the exception of significantly increased amounts of gallic acid and some flavonoids. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive study reported herein of the polyphenolic profile of hybrids from international breeding programs, but also of new breeds from private initiatives, all cultivated in the same vineyard, will support the selection of promising candidates for further breeding programs to overcome impairment due to undesired sensory characteristics of new highly resistant varieties.


Subject(s)
Fruit/chemistry , Polyphenols/chemistry , Vitis/genetics , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Disease Resistance , Fruit/genetics , Fruit/immunology , Fruit/microbiology , Fungi/physiology , Hybridization, Genetic , Italy , Mass Spectrometry , Plant Breeding , Plant Diseases/immunology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Vitis/chemistry , Vitis/immunology , Vitis/microbiology
10.
J Sci Food Agric ; 101(5): 1744-1757, 2021 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974893

ABSTRACT

Food loss of fruit and vegetables caused by postharvest diseases is a major issue worldwide. The method used to prevent and control postharvest diseases is usually to use chemical fungicides, but long-term and large-scale use will make the pathogens resistant and potentially have a negative impact on human health and the ecological environment. Therefore, finding a safe and effective biological control method instead of chemical control is a hot research topic in recent years. Endophytes, colonizing plants asymptomatically, can promote the growth of the hosts and enhance their resistance. The use of endophytes as biological control agents for postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables has attracted increasing attention in the last 20 years. Compared with chemical control, endophytes have the advantages of being more environmentally friendly, sustainable, and safer. However, there are relatively few relevant studies, so herein we summarize the available literature. This review focuses mainly on the recent progress of using endophytes to enhance the resistance of postharvest fruit and vegetables to diseases, with the emphasis on the possible mechanisms and the potential applications. Furthermore, this article suggests future areas for study using antagonistic endophytes to prevent and control fruit and vegetable postharvest diseases: (i) screening more potential broad-spectrum anti-pathogen endophytes and their metabolic active substances by the method of macrogenomics; (ii) elucidating the underlining molecular mechanism among endophytes, harvested vegetables and fruit, pathogens, and microbial communities; (iii) needing more application research to overcome the difficulties of commercialization practice. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.


Subject(s)
Endophytes/physiology , Fruit/microbiology , Plant Diseases/immunology , Vegetables/microbiology , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Disease Resistance , Endophytes/classification , Endophytes/genetics , Endophytes/isolation & purification , Fruit/chemistry , Fruit/immunology , Plant Diseases/microbiology , Plant Diseases/prevention & control , Vegetables/chemistry , Vegetables/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL