Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 273.671
Filter
Add more filters

Uruguay Oncology Collection
Publication year range
1.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 40: 387-411, 2022 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119910

ABSTRACT

Cell identity and function largely rely on the programming of transcriptomes during development and differentiation. Signature gene expression programs are orchestrated by regulatory circuits consisting of cis-acting promoters and enhancers, which respond to a plethora of cues via the action of transcription factors. In turn, transcription factors direct epigenetic modifications to revise chromatin landscapes, and drive contacts between distal promoter-enhancer combinations. In immune cells, regulatory circuits for effector genes are especially complex and flexible, utilizing distinct sets of transcription factors and enhancers, depending on the cues each cell type receives during an infection, after sensing cellular damage, or upon encountering a tumor. Here, we review major players in the coordination of gene regulatory programs within innate and adaptive immune cells, as well as integrative omics approaches that can be leveraged to decipher their underlying circuitry.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Gene Regulatory Networks , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription Factors/genetics
2.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 39: 481-509, 2021 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577347

ABSTRACT

Posttranscriptional control of mRNA regulates various biological processes, including inflammatory and immune responses. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) bind cis-regulatory elements in the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNA and regulate mRNA turnover and translation. In particular, eight RBPs (TTP, AUF1, KSRP, TIA-1/TIAR, Roquin, Regnase, HuR, and Arid5a) have been extensively studied and are key posttranscriptional regulators of inflammation and immune responses. These RBPs sometimes collaboratively or competitively bind the same target mRNA to enhance or dampen regulatory activities. These RBPs can also bind their own 3' UTRs to negatively or positively regulate their expression. Both upstream signaling pathways and microRNA regulation shape the interactions between RBPs and target RNA. Dysregulation of RBPs results in chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. Here, we summarize the functional roles of these eight RBPs in immunity and their associated diseases.


Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , RNA Stability , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism
3.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 39: 345-368, 2021 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556247

ABSTRACT

For many infections and almost all vaccines, neutralizing-antibody-mediated immunity is the primary basis and best functional correlate of immunological protection. Durable long-term humoral immunity is mediated by antibodies secreted by plasma cells that preexist subsequent exposures and by memory B cells that rapidly respond to infections once they have occurred. In the midst of the current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019, it is important to define our current understanding of the unique roles of memory B cells and plasma cells in immunity and the factors that control the formation and persistence of these cell types. This fundamental knowledge is the basis to interpret findings from natural infections and vaccines. Here, we review transcriptional and metabolic programs that promote and support B cell fates and functions, suggesting points at which these pathways do and do not intersect.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Energy Metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Immunologic Memory , Plasma Cells/immunology , Plasma Cells/metabolism , Animals , Biomarkers , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Differentiation/immunology , Cell Survival/genetics , Cell Survival/immunology , Germinal Center/immunology , Germinal Center/metabolism , Humans , Immunologic Memory/genetics , Lymphocyte Activation/genetics , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Transcription, Genetic
4.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 38: 341-363, 2020 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31961750

ABSTRACT

Recent years have witnessed an emergence of interest in understanding metabolic changes associated with immune responses, termed immunometabolism. As oxygen is central to all aerobic metabolism, hypoxia is now recognized to contribute fundamentally to inflammatory and immune responses. Studies from a number of groups have implicated a prominent role for oxygen metabolism and hypoxia in innate immunity of healthy tissue (physiologic hypoxia) and during active inflammation (inflammatory hypoxia). This inflammatory hypoxia emanates from a combination of recruited inflammatory cells (e.g., neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes), high rates of oxidative metabolism, and the activation of multiple oxygen-consuming enzymes during inflammation. These localized shifts toward hypoxia have identified a prominent role for the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) in the regulation of innate immunity. Such studies have provided new and enlightening insight into our basic understanding of immune mechanisms, and extensions of these findings have identified potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we summarize recent literature around the topic of innate immunity and mucosal hypoxia with a focus on transcriptional responses mediated by HIF.


Subject(s)
Hypoxia/immunology , Hypoxia/metabolism , Immunity, Innate , Animals , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Dendritic Cells/metabolism , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Energy Metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Hypoxia/genetics , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1/genetics , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1/metabolism , Immunomodulation , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Monocytes/immunology , Monocytes/metabolism , Signal Transduction
5.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 38: 455-485, 2020 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004099

ABSTRACT

Immune cells use a variety of membrane-disrupting proteins [complement, perforin, perforin-2, granulysin, gasdermins, mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL)] to induce different kinds of death of microbes and host cells, some of which cause inflammation. After activation by proteolytic cleavage or phosphorylation, these proteins oligomerize, bind to membrane lipids, and disrupt membrane integrity. These membrane disruptors play a critical role in both innate and adaptive immunity. Here we review our current knowledge of the functions, specificity, activation, and regulation of membrane-disrupting immune proteins and what is known about the mechanisms behind membrane damage, the structure of the pores they form, how the cells expressing these lethal proteins are protected, and how cells targeted for destruction can sometimes escape death by repairing membrane damage.


Subject(s)
Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Immunity , Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Apoptosis/immunology , Biomarkers , Cell Membrane/immunology , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Complement Membrane Attack Complex , Complement System Proteins/immunology , Complement System Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Immune System/immunology , Immune System/metabolism , Lipid Metabolism , Necroptosis/genetics , Necroptosis/immunology , Necrosis/genetics , Necrosis/immunology , Necrosis/metabolism , Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins/chemistry , Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins/genetics , Structure-Activity Relationship
6.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 36: 73-101, 2018 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29144836

ABSTRACT

The cellular degradative pathway of autophagy has a fundamental role in immunity. Here, we review the function of autophagy and autophagy proteins in inflammation. We discuss how the autophagy machinery controls the burden of infectious agents while simultaneously limiting inflammatory pathologies, which often involves processes that are distinct from conventional autophagy. Among the newly emerging processes we describe are LC3-associated phagocytosis and targeting by autophagy proteins, both of which require many of the same proteins that mediate conventional autophagy. We also discuss how autophagy contributes to differentiation of myeloid and lymphoid cell types, coordinates multicellular immunity, and facilitates memory responses. Together, these functions establish an intimate link between autophagy, mucosal immunity, and chronic inflammatory diseases. Finally, we offer our perspective on current challenges and barriers to translation.


Subject(s)
Autophagy , Disease Susceptibility , Inflammation/etiology , Animals , Biomarkers , Gene Expression Regulation , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Immune System/cytology , Immune System/immunology , Immune System/metabolism , Immunomodulation , Inflammation/diagnosis , Inflammation/metabolism , Signal Transduction
7.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 36: 103-125, 2018 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29261409

ABSTRACT

T cell receptors (TCRs) are protein complexes formed by six different polypeptides. In most T cells, TCRs are composed of αß subunits displaying immunoglobulin-like variable domains that recognize peptide antigens associated with major histocompatibility complex molecules expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells. TCRαß subunits are associated with the CD3 complex formed by the γ, δ, ε, and ζ subunits, which are invariable and ensure signal transduction. Here, we review how the expression and function of TCR complexes are orchestrated by several fine-tuned cellular processes that encompass (a) synthesis of the subunits and their correct assembly and expression at the plasma membrane as a single functional complex, (b) TCR membrane localization and dynamics at the plasma membrane and in endosomal compartments, (c) TCR signal transduction leading to T cell activation, and (d) TCR degradation. These processes balance each other to ensure efficient T cell responses to a variety of antigenic stimuli while preventing autoimmunity.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism , Signal Transduction , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Animals , Biomarkers , CD3 Complex/genetics , CD3 Complex/metabolism , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Endocytosis/genetics , Endocytosis/immunology , Endosomes/metabolism , Humans , Immunomodulation , Multiprotein Complexes/chemistry , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , Proteolysis , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/chemistry , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics , Structure-Activity Relationship
8.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 36: 127-156, 2018 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29237129

ABSTRACT

T cells possess an array of functional capabilities important for host defense against pathogens and tumors. T cell effector functions require the T cell antigen receptor (TCR). The TCR has no intrinsic enzymatic activity, and thus signal transduction from the receptor relies on additional signaling molecules. One such molecule is the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase ZAP-70, which associates with the TCR complex and is required for initiating the canonical biochemical signal pathways downstream of the TCR. In this article, we describe recent structure-based insights into the regulation and substrate specificity of ZAP-70, and then we review novel methods for determining the role of ZAP-70 catalytic activity-dependent and -independent signals in developing and mature T cells. Lastly, we discuss the disease states in mouse models and humans, which range from immunodeficiency to autoimmunity, that are caused by mutations in ZAP-70.


Subject(s)
Disease Susceptibility , Signal Transduction , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase/metabolism , Animals , Autoimmunity , Biomarkers , Catalysis , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Differentiation/immunology , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Immunity , Lymphocyte Activation/genetics , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology , Phosphorylation , Protein Transport , Structure-Activity Relationship , Substrate Specificity , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase/chemistry , ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase/genetics
9.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 36: 579-601, 2018 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29677476

ABSTRACT

A fundamental question in developmental immunology is how bipotential thymocyte precursors generate both CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T cell lineages. The MHC specificity of αß T cell receptors (TCRs) on precursors is closely correlated with cell fate-determining processes, prompting studies to characterize how variations in TCR signaling are linked with genetic programs establishing lineage-specific gene expression signatures, such as exclusive CD4 or CD8 expression. The key transcription factors ThPOK and Runx3 have been identified as mediating development of helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages, respectively. Together with increasing knowledge of epigenetic regulators, these findings have advanced our understanding of the transcription factor network regulating the CD4/CD8 dichotomy. It has also become apparent that CD4+ T cells retain developmental plasticity, allowing them to acquire cytotoxic activity in the periphery. Despite such advances, further studies are necessary to identify the molecular links between TCR signaling and the nuclear machinery regulating expression of ThPOK and Runx3.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/cytology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/cytology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , Animals , CD4 Antigens/genetics , CD4 Antigens/metabolism , CD8 Antigens/genetics , CD8 Antigens/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Lineage/immunology , Core Binding Factor Alpha 3 Subunit/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Immunomodulation/genetics , Immunomodulation/immunology , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription, Genetic
10.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 35: 177-198, 2017 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125358

ABSTRACT

The discovery of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) has provided a new perspective on gene regulation in diverse biological contexts. lncRNAs are remarkably versatile molecules that interact with RNA, DNA, or proteins to promote or restrain the expression of protein-coding genes. Activation of immune cells is associated with dynamic changes in expression of genes, the products of which combat infectious microorganisms, initiate repair, and resolve inflammatory responses in cells and tissues. Recent evidence indicates that lncRNAs play important roles in directing the development of diverse immune cells and controlling the dynamic transcriptional programs that are a hallmark of immune cell activation. The importance of these molecules is underscored by their newly recognized roles in inflammatory diseases. In this review, we discuss the contribution of lncRNAs in the development and activation of immune cells and their roles in immune-related diseases. We also discuss challenges faced in identifying biological functions for this large and complex class of genes.


Subject(s)
Immune System Diseases/genetics , Immunity/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/immunology , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans
11.
Cell ; 187(2): 331-344.e17, 2024 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194964

ABSTRACT

Enhancers are distal DNA elements believed to loop and contact promoters to control gene expression. Recently, we found diffraction-sized transcriptional condensates at genes controlled by clusters of enhancers (super-enhancers). However, a direct function of endogenous condensates in controlling gene expression remains elusive. Here, we develop live-cell super-resolution and multi-color 3D-imaging approaches to investigate putative roles of endogenous condensates in the regulation of super-enhancer controlled gene Sox2. In contrast to enhancer distance, we find instead that the condensate's positional dynamics are a better predictor of gene expression. A basal gene bursting occurs when the condensate is far (>1 µm), but burst size and frequency are enhanced when the condensate moves in proximity (<1 µm). Perturbations of cohesin and local DNA elements do not prevent basal bursting but affect the condensate and its burst enhancement. We propose a three-way kissing model whereby the condensate interacts transiently with gene locus and regulatory DNA elements to control gene bursting.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , SOXB1 Transcription Factors , Super Enhancers , Transcription, Genetic , DNA/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Mice , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Microscopy/methods
12.
Cell ; 187(11): 2746-2766.e25, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631355

ABSTRACT

Precise control of gene expression levels is essential for normal cell functions, yet how they are defined and tightly maintained, particularly at intermediate levels, remains elusive. Here, using a series of newly developed sequencing, imaging, and functional assays, we uncover a class of transcription factors with dual roles as activators and repressors, referred to as condensate-forming level-regulating dual-action transcription factors (TFs). They reduce high expression but increase low expression to achieve stable intermediate levels. Dual-action TFs directly exert activating and repressing functions via condensate-forming domains that compartmentalize core transcriptional unit selectively. Clinically relevant mutations in these domains, which are linked to a range of developmental disorders, impair condensate selectivity and dual-action TF activity. These results collectively address a fundamental question in expression regulation and demonstrate the potential of level-regulating dual-action TFs as powerful effectors for engineering controlled expression levels.


Subject(s)
Transcription Factors , Animals , Humans , Mice , Gene Expression Regulation , Mutation , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Cell Line
13.
Cell ; 187(3): 692-711.e26, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262408

ABSTRACT

Transcription factors (TFs) can define distinct cellular identities despite nearly identical DNA-binding specificities. One mechanism for achieving regulatory specificity is DNA-guided TF cooperativity. Although in vitro studies suggest that it may be common, examples of such cooperativity remain scarce in cellular contexts. Here, we demonstrate how "Coordinator," a long DNA motif composed of common motifs bound by many basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and homeodomain (HD) TFs, uniquely defines the regulatory regions of embryonic face and limb mesenchyme. Coordinator guides cooperative and selective binding between the bHLH family mesenchymal regulator TWIST1 and a collective of HD factors associated with regional identities in the face and limb. TWIST1 is required for HD binding and open chromatin at Coordinator sites, whereas HD factors stabilize TWIST1 occupancy at Coordinator and titrate it away from HD-independent sites. This cooperativity results in the shared regulation of genes involved in cell-type and positional identities and ultimately shapes facial morphology and evolution.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins , Embryonic Development , Transcription Factors , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/metabolism , Binding Sites , DNA/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Mesoderm/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Humans , Animals , Mice , Extremities/growth & development
14.
Annu Rev Biochem ; 92: 175-198, 2023 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37018844

ABSTRACT

Chemical modifications on mRNA represent a critical layer of gene expression regulation. Research in this area has continued to accelerate over the last decade, as more modifications are being characterized with increasing depth and breadth. mRNA modifications have been demonstrated to influence nearly every step from the early phases of transcript synthesis in the nucleus through to their decay in the cytoplasm, but in many cases, the molecular mechanisms involved in these processes remain mysterious. Here, we highlight recent work that has elucidated the roles of mRNA modifications throughout the mRNA life cycle, describe gaps in our understanding and remaining open questions, and offer some forward-looking perspective on future directions in the field.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , RNA/genetics , RNA/metabolism
15.
Annu Rev Biochem ; 92: 145-173, 2023 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37068770

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, mRNA modifications have emerged as important regulators of gene expression control in cells. Fueled in large part by the development of tools for detecting RNA modifications transcriptome wide, researchers have uncovered a diverse epitranscriptome that serves as an additional layer of gene regulation beyond simple RNA sequence. Here, we review the proteins that write, read, and erase these marks, with a particular focus on the most abundant internal modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A). We first describe the discovery of the key enzymes that deposit and remove m6A and other modifications and discuss how our understanding of these proteins has shaped our views of modification dynamics. We then review current models for the function of m6A reader proteins and how our knowledge of these proteins has evolved. Finally, we highlight important future directions for the field and discuss key questions that remain unanswered.


Subject(s)
Adenosine , Gene Expression Regulation , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Adenosine/genetics , Adenosine/metabolism , Proteins/genetics , Proteins/metabolism , Transcriptome
16.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 34: 93-119, 2016 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735697

ABSTRACT

The dendritic cells (DCs) of the immune system function in innate and adaptive responses by directing activity of various effector cells rather than serving as effectors themselves. DCs and closely related myeloid lineages share expression of many surface receptors, presenting a challenge in distinguishing their unique in vivo functions. Recent work has taken advantage of unique transcriptional programs to identify and manipulate murine DCs in vivo. This work has assigned several nonredundant in vivo functions to distinct DC lineages, consisting of plasmacytoid DCs and several subsets of classical DCs that promote different immune effector modules in response to pathogens. In parallel, a correspondence between human and murine DC subsets has emerged, underlying structural similarities for the DC lineages between these species. Recent work has begun to unravel the transcriptional circuitry that controls the development and diversification of DCs from common progenitors in the bone marrow.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Cells/physiology , Dendritic Cells/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation , Immunity, Cellular , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Regulatory Networks , Humans , Immunity, Cellular/genetics , Mice , Transcriptional Activation
17.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 34: 335-68, 2016 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26907215

ABSTRACT

Although T cell help for B cells was described several decades ago, it was the identification of CXCR5 expression by B follicular helper T (Tfh) cells and the subsequent discovery of their dependence on BCL6 that led to the recognition of Tfh cells as an independent helper subset and accelerated the pace of discovery. More than 20 transcription factors, together with RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs, control the expression of chemotactic receptors and molecules important for the function and homeostasis of Tfh cells. Tfh cells prime B cells to initiate extrafollicular and germinal center antibody responses and are crucial for affinity maturation and maintenance of humoral memory. In addition to the roles that Tfh cells have in antimicrobial defense, in cancer, and as HIV reservoirs, regulation of these cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity. The realization that follicular T cells are heterogeneous, comprising helper and regulatory subsets, has raised questions regarding a possible division of labor in germinal center B cell selection and elimination.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Germinal Center/immunology , Immunity, Humoral , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , Immunologic Memory , Lymphocyte Activation , MicroRNAs/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR5/metabolism
18.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 34: 299-316, 2016 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27168240

ABSTRACT

The discovery of tissue-resident innate lymphoid cell populations effecting different forms of type 1, 2, and 3 immunity; tissue repair; and immune regulation has transformed our understanding of mucosal immunity and allergy. The emerging complexity of these populations along with compounding issues of redundancy and plasticity raise intriguing questions about their precise lineage relationship. Here we review advances in mapping the emergence of these lineages from early lymphoid precursors. We discuss the identification of a common innate lymphoid cell precursor characterized by transient expression of the transcription factor PLZF, and the lineage relationships of innate lymphoid cells with conventional natural killer cells and lymphoid tissue inducer cells. We also review the rapidly growing understanding of the network of transcription factors that direct the development of these lineages.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunity, Innate , Lymphocytes/immunology , Lymphoid Progenitor Cells/immunology , Animals , Cell Lineage , Cytokines/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation/immunology , Gene Regulatory Networks , Humans , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/genetics , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/metabolism , Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger Protein , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology
19.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 34: 265-97, 2016 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26907214

ABSTRACT

MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules are critical in the control of many immune responses. They are also involved in most autoimmune diseases and other pathologies. Here, we describe the biology of MHC-II and MHC-II variations that affect immune responses. We discuss the classic cell biology of MHC-II and various perturbations. Proteolysis is a major process in the biology of MHC-II, and we describe the various components forming and controlling this endosomal proteolytic machinery. This process ultimately determines the MHC-II-presented peptidome, including cryptic peptides, modified peptides, and other peptides that are relevant in autoimmune responses. MHC-II also variable in expression, glycosylation, and turnover. We illustrate that MHC-II is variable not only in amino acids (polymorphic) but also in its biology, with consequences for both health and disease.


Subject(s)
Antigen Presentation , Antigens/metabolism , Endosomes/metabolism , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/metabolism , Immune System Diseases/immunology , Animals , Antigens/immunology , Autoimmunity , Endocytosis , Gene Expression Regulation , Glycosylation , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Humans , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Polymorphism, Genetic , Protein Transport , Proteolysis
20.
Cell ; 186(18): 3826-3844.e26, 2023 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37536338

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have identified topologically associating domains (TADs) as basic units of genome organization. We present evidence of a previously unreported level of genome folding, where distant TAD pairs, megabases apart, interact to form meta-domains. Within meta-domains, gene promoters and structural intergenic elements present in distant TADs are specifically paired. The associated genes encode neuronal determinants, including those engaged in axonal guidance and adhesion. These long-range associations occur in a large fraction of neurons but support transcription in only a subset of neurons. Meta-domains are formed by diverse transcription factors that are able to pair over long and flexible distances. We present evidence that two such factors, GAF and CTCF, play direct roles in this process. The relative simplicity of higher-order meta-domain interactions in Drosophila, compared with those previously described in mammals, allowed the demonstration that genomes can fold into highly specialized cell-type-specific scaffolds that enable megabase-scale regulatory associations.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Insect , Drosophila , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , DNA Packaging , Drosophila/genetics , Mammals/genetics , Neurogenesis , Neurons , Transcription Factors , Drosophila Proteins , Genome, Insect , Gene Expression Regulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL