Hey, Big Spender! Why Does Your Quality Lag So Far Behind Other Countries?

The United States is the world's biggest spender on health care by far. And what do we get for it? Not as much as we should. Our quality shortcomings are not for lack of knowledge: Stakeholders know what to do to close these gaps. So why aren't they doing it?

A role for communities in primary prevention of chronic illness? Case studies in regional Australia.

In regional Australia "communities of place," defined as bounded geographic locations with a local society, undertake community-wide primary prevention programs. In helping to prevent chronic illness, communities provide valuable resources to the health system. To understand the role of community-health sector partnerships for primary prevention and the community contextual factors that affect them, we studied eight partnerships. We used an embedded multiple case study design and collected data through interviews, nonparticipant observation, and document analysis. These data were analyzed using a typology of community-health sector partnerships and community interaction theory to frame the key community contextual factors that affected partnerships. The dominant factor affecting all partnerships was the presence of a collective commitment that communities brought to making the community a better place through developing health. We call this a communitarian approach. Additional research to investigate factors influencing a communitarian approach and the role it plays in partnerships is required.

The effects of a community-based partnership, Project Access Dallas (PAD), on emergency department utilization and costs among the uninsured.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 19% of non-elderly adults are without health insurance. The uninsured frequently lack a source of primary care and are more likely to use the emergency department (ED) for routine care. Improving access to primary care for the uninsured is one strategy to reduce ED overutilization and related costs. METHODS: A comparison group quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate a broad-based community partnership that provided access to care for the uninsured-Project Access Dallas (PAD)-on ED utilization and related costs. Eligible uninsured patients seen in the ED were enrolled in PAD (n = 265) with similar patients not enrolled in PAD (n = 309) serving as controls. Study patients were aged 18-65 years, <200% of the federal poverty level and uninsured. Outcome measures include the number of ED visits, hospital days and direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: PAD program enrollees had significantly fewer ED visits (0.93 vs. 1.44; P < 0.01) and fewer inpatient hospital days (0.37 vs. 1.07; P < 0.05) than controls. Direct hospital costs were ∼60% less ($1188 vs. $446; P < 0.01) and indirect costs were 50% less ($313 vs. $692; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A broad-based community partnership program can significantly reduce ED utilization and related costs among the uninsured.

Assessing the level of public health partner spending using the funding formula analysis tool.

Public health services are delivered through a variety of organizations. Traditional accounting of public health expenditures typically captures only spending by government agencies. New Hampshire collected information from public health partners, such as community centers that host smoking cessation classes or health education done by Girls, Inc. This study compares the new data to spending by government agencies, focusing on breakdowns by fund source and service categories. Expanded funds secured by these partners account for a 42% of all local public health spending, and they spent 4 times more than government agencies on promoting healthy behavior. The funding formula analysis tool revealed that these partners spent in ways that would be politically difficult to achieve. In an era of declining budgets, an understanding of public health's partners is increasingly vital.

Practices to improve transitions of care: a national perspective.

Improving transitions of care has significant importance to our health care system. While care transitions has been studied and researched by many individuals over the past 20 years, more work is needed to further improve the process. Those beginning to focus on transitions need not begin from scratch, but can use information and research from national and regional collaborative models, as well as other tools and resources to enhance the quality of transitions programs.

Community joins forces to care for uninsured.

Faced with a high rate of unemployment and an increase in uninsured patients, Lee Memorial Health system in Ft. Myers, FL sponsored a community-wide effort to provide health care options for unfunded patients. Triage Center provides post-acute medical care for the homeless. Salvation Army operates 10-bed respite unit that provides skilled nursing services for homeless. Hospital operates free clinics for the uninsured.

Continued benefits of a technical assistance web site to local tobacco control coalitions during a state budget shortfall.

CONTEXT: A state budget shortfall defunded 10 local tobacco coalitions during a randomized trial but defunded coalitions continued to have access to 2 technical assistance Web sites. OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of Web-based technology to provide technical assistance to local tobacco control coalitions. DESIGN: Randomized 2-group trial with local tobacco control coalitions as the unit of randomization. SETTING: Local communities (ie, counties) within the State of Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Leaders and members in 34 local tobacco control coalitions funded by the state health department in Colorado. INTERVENTION: Two technical assistance Web sites: A Basic Web site with text-based information and a multimedia Enhanced Web site containing learning modules, resources, and communication features. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Use of the Web sites in minutes, pages, and session and evaluations of coalition functioning on coalition development, conflict resolution, leadership satisfaction, decision-making satisfaction, shared mission, personal involvement, and organization involvement in survey of leaders and members. RESULTS: Coalitions that were defunded but had access to the multimedia Enhanced Web site during the Fully Funded period and after defunding continued to use it (treatment group × funding status × period, F(3,714) = 3.18, P = .0234). Coalitions with access to the Basic Web site had low Web site use throughout and use by defunded coalitions was nearly zero when funding ceased. Members in defunded Basic Web site coalitions reported that their coalitions functioned worse than defunded Enhanced Web site coalitions (coalition development: group × status, F(1,360) = 4.81, P = .029; conflict resolution: group × status, F(1,306) = 5.69, P = .018; leadership satisfaction: group × status, F(1,342) = 5.69, P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The Enhanced Web site may have had a protective effect on defunded coalitions. Defunded coalitions may have increased their capacity by using the Enhanced Web site when fully funded or by continuing to use the available online resources after defunding. Web-based technical assistance with online training and resources may be a good investment when future funding is not ensured.

Health care coalitions: from joint purchasing to local health reform.

For several decades, business and health coalitions have played an important role in representing the interests of business in the health care arena. During the 1990s, these coalitions focused their efforts on supporting purchasing activities related to health insurance benefits and direct health care. Based on a national survey conducted in 2006, and prior similar surveys, we find that business and health coalitions have invested in pooling regional health care data, promoting public reporting of quality and cost information, and coordinating pay-for-performance initiatives. In addition, many business and health coalitions are broadening their membership to include other stakeholders and to support community health reform efforts with far-reaching benefits. Through this work, coalitions increasingly are recognizing and embracing their role as catalysts for local market reform.

Funding profiles of multisector health care alliances and their positioning for sustainability.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between different aspects of alliance funding profiles (e.g. range of sources, dependence on specific sources) and participant' perceptions of how well the organization is positioned for the future. Design/methodology/approach A mixed method study in the context of eight alliances participating in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Aligning Forces for Quality program. Data collection approaches included surveys of alliance participants and semi-structured interviews with alliance leaders. Findings The findings indicate that dependence on grant revenues, in particular, may be problematic for how well alliances are positioned for sustainability. While a number of approaches were identified to reduce dependence on grants, implementing these strategies presented more of a challenge for alliances due to the contextual demands of their external environment and a need to strike a balance between pursuing alternative revenue sources and fidelity to the mission and identity of the organization. Practical implications Alliance leaders need to have not only a broad and accurate understanding of their external environment, but also an appreciation of the alliance's identity in that environment. Collectively, the findings can help organizational leaders be more informed about their funding choices and the implications those choices have for the future of their organization. Originality/value Collaborative forms of organizations (e.g. alliances, coalitions, networks) are increasingly viewed as an effective means of addressing complex, multifaceted health, and social challenges. For collaborative organizations that depend on the coordinated efforts of volunteers, addressing such complex issues is predicated on sustaining programmatic activities as well as the interest and participation of stakeholders over extended periods of time. This study sheds light on how leaders of these organizations may improve their prospects for sustainability.

A mixed-method evaluation of the New York State Eat Well Play Hard Community Projects: Building local capacity for sustainable childhood obesity prevention.

This study used a mixed-method, comparative case study approach to assess the level of capacity built for childhood obesity prevention among seven New York State Eat Well Play Hard-Community Projects (EWPH-CP). Data were collected through a self-reported survey in 2007, semi-structured interviews in 2009, and EWPH-CP program documentation throughout the 2006-2010 funding cycle. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were used along with an integrative framework for assessing local capacity building to characterize the capacity built by the study coalitions. Four coalitions rated membership characteristics as a challenge at the beginning of the funding cycle. Towards the end of the funding cycle, all seven coalitions reported activities that were initially focused on building their membership (i.e., member capacity) or positive working relationships (i.e. relational capacity), before eventually pursuing support and resources (i.e., organizational capacity) for implementing their chosen community-oriented programmatic goals (i.e., programmatic capacity). Five coalitions reported environmental changes aimed at increasing physical activity or fruit and vegetable intake. Technical assistance provided to coalitions was credited with contributing to the achievement of programmatic goals. These results suggest that the coalitions succeeded in building local capacity for increasing age-appropriate physical activity or fruit and vegetables intake in the target communities.