Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 398
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Lancet ; 397(10288): 1992-2011, 2021 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33965066

ABSTRACT

Approximately 13% of the total UK workforce is employed in the health and care sector. Despite substantial workforce planning efforts, the effectiveness of this planning has been criticised. Education, training, and workforce plans have typically considered each health-care profession in isolation and have not adequately responded to changing health and care needs. The results are persistent vacancies, poor morale, and low retention. Areas of particular concern highlighted in this Health Policy paper include primary care, mental health, nursing, clinical and non-clinical support, and social care. Responses to workforce shortfalls have included a high reliance on foreign and temporary staff, small-scale changes in skill mix, and enhanced recruitment drives. Impending challenges for the UK health and care workforce include growing multimorbidity, an increasing shortfall in the supply of unpaid carers, and the relative decline of the attractiveness of the National Health Service (NHS) as an employer internationally. We argue that to secure a sustainable and fit-for-purpose health and care workforce, integrated workforce approaches need to be developed alongside reforms to education and training that reflect changes in roles and skill mix, as well as the trend towards multidisciplinary working. Enhancing career development opportunities, promoting staff wellbeing, and tackling discrimination in the NHS are all needed to improve recruitment, retention, and morale of staff. An urgent priority is to offer sufficient aftercare and support to staff who have been exposed to high-risk situations and traumatic experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to growing calls to recognise and reward health and care staff, growth in pay must at least keep pace with projected rises in average earnings, which in turn will require linking future NHS funding allocations to rises in pay. Through illustrative projections, we show that, to sustain annual growth in the workforce at approximately 2·4%, increases in NHS expenditure of 4% annually in real terms will be required. Above all, a radical long-term strategic vision is needed to ensure that the future NHS workforce is fit for purpose.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/psychology , Health Occupations/economics , Health Occupations/education , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Occupational Stress , Personnel Selection , State Medicine/economics , United Kingdom
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(2): 182-189, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33485458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing demand for cancer surgery has placed a global strain on health systems. In-depth analyses of the global demand for cancer surgery and optimal workforce requirements are needed to plan service provision. We estimated the global demand for cancer surgery and the requirements for an optimal surgical and anaesthesia workforce, using benchmarks based on clinical guidelines. METHODS: Using models of benchmark surgical use based on clinical guidelines, we estimated the proportion of cancer cases with an indication for surgery across 183 countries, stratified by income group. These proportions were multiplied by age-adjusted national estimates of new cancer cases using GLOBOCAN 2018 data and then aggregated to obtain the estimated number of surgical procedures required globally. The numbers of cancer surgical procedures in 44 high-income countries were divided by the actual number of surgeons and anaesthetists in the respective countries to calculate cancer procedures per surgeon and anaesthetist ratios. Using the median (IQR) of these ratios as benchmarks, we developed a three-tiered optimal surgical and anaesthesia workforce matrix, and the predictions were extrapolated up to 2040. FINDINGS: Our model estimates that the number of cancer cases globally with an indication for surgery will increase by 5 million procedures (52%) between 2018 (9 065 000) and 2040 (13 821 000). The greatest relative increase in surgical demand will occur in 34 low-income countries, where we also observed the largest gaps in workforce requirements. To match the median benchmark for high-income countries, the surgical workforce in these countries would need to increase by almost four times and the anaesthesia workforce by nearly 5·5 times. The greatest increase in optimal workforce requirements from 2018 to 2040 will occur in low-income countries (from 28 000 surgeons to 58 000 surgeons; 107% increase), followed by lower-middle-income countries (from 166 000 surgeons to 277 000 surgeons; 67% increase). INTERPRETATION: The global demand for cancer surgery and the optimal workforce are predicted to increase over the next two decades and disproportionately affect low-income countries. These estimates provide an appropriate framework for planning the provision of surgical services for cancer worldwide. FUNDING: University of New South Wales Scientia Scholarship and UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/trends , Health Systems Plans/trends , Health Workforce/trends , Neoplasms/surgery , Anesthesia/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Global Health/economics , Health Systems Plans/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Income , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Surgeons/economics
3.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 5): S471-S478, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrated that wage disparities exist across race and ethnicity within selected health care occupations. Wage disparities may negatively affect the industry's ability to recruit and retain a diverse workforce throughout the career ladder. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether wage disparities by race and ethnicity persist across health care occupations and whether disparities vary across the skill spectrum. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 2011-2018 data from the Current Population Survey using Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition regression methods to identify sources of variation in wage disparities. Separate models were run for 9 health care occupations. SUBJECTS: Employed individuals 18 and older working in health care occupations, categorized by race/ethnicity. MEASURES: Annual wages were predicted as a function of race/ethnicity, age, sex, marital status, having a child under 5 in the household, living in a metro area, highest education attained, and usual hours worked. RESULTS: Non-Hispanics consistently made more than Hispanic licensed practical/vocational nurses (LPNs/LVNs), aides/assistants, technicians, and community-based workers. Asian/Pacific Islanders consistently made more than Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Multiracial individuals across occupations except physicians, advanced practitioners, or therapists. Asian/Pacific Islanders only made significantly less when compared with White physicians, but more than White advanced practitioners, registered nurses, LPNs/LVNs, and aides/assistants. Based on observed attributes, Black registered nurses, LPNs/LVNs, and aides/assistants were predicted to make more than their White peers, but unexplained variation negated these gains. CONCLUSIONS: Many wage gaps remained unexplained based on measured factors warranting further study. Addressing wage disparities is critical to advance in careers and reduce job turnover.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Retrospective Studies , United States
4.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 5): S428-S433, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of community health centers (CHCs) have found that clinicians supported by the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) provide a comparable number of primary care visits per full-time clinician as non-NHSC clinicians and provide more behavioral health care visits per clinician than non-NHSC clinicians. This present study extends prior research by examining the contribution of NHSC and non-NHSC clinicians to medical and behavioral health costs per visit. METHODS: Using 2013-2017 data from 1022 federally qualified health centers merged with the NHSC participant data, we constructed multivariate linear regression models with health center and year fixed effects to examine the marginal effect of each additional NHSC and non-NHSC staff full-time equivalent (FTE) on medical and behavioral health care costs per visit in CHCs. RESULTS: On average, each additional NHSC behavioral health staff FTE was associated with a significant reduction of 3.55 dollars of behavioral health care costs per visit in CHCs and was associated with a larger reduction of 7.95 dollars in rural CHCs specifically. In contrast, each additional non-NHSC behavioral health staff FTE did not significantly affect changes in behavioral health care costs per visit. Each additional NHSC primary care staff FTE was not significantly associated with higher medical care costs per visit, while each additional non-NHSC clinician contributed to a slight increase of $0.66 in medical care costs per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with previous findings on productivity, the present findings suggest that the use of NHSC clinicians is an effective approach to improving the capacity of CHCs by increasing medical and behavioral health care visits without increasing costs of services in CHCs, including rural health centers.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Community Health Centers/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/economics , State Medicine/economics , Community Mental Health Services/economics , Humans , Medically Underserved Area , Primary Health Care/economics , United States
5.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 5): S479-S485, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524246

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to measure wage differences between registered nurses (RNs) working in long-term care (LTC) (eg, nursing homes, home health) and non-LTC settings (eg, hospitals, ambulatory care) and whether differences are associated with the characteristics of the RN workforce between and within settings. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional design. This study used the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN) public-use file to examine RN employment and earnings. METHODS: Our study population included a sample of 15,373 RNs who were employed at least 1000 hours in nursing in the past year and active in patient care. Characteristics such as race/ethnicity, type of RN degree completed, census region, and union status were included. Multiple regression analyses examined the effect of these characteristics on wages. Logistic regression was used to predict RN employment in LTC settings. RESULTS: RNs in LTC experienced lower wages compared with those in non-LTC settings, yet this difference was not associated with racial/ethnic or international educational differences. Among RNs working in LTC, lower wages were associated with part-time work, less experience, lack of union representation, and regional wage differences. CONCLUSION: Because RNs in LTC earn lower wages than RNs in other settings, policies to minimize pay inequities are needed to support the RN workforce caring for frail older adults.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Long-Term Care/economics , Nurses/economics , Regression Analysis , United States
6.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 5): S457-S462, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until 2016, community health centers (CHCs) reported community health workers (CHWs) as part of their overall enabling services workforce, making analyses of CHW use over time infeasible in the annual Uniform Data System (UDS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine changes in the CHW workforce among CHCs from 2016 to 2018 and factors associated with the use of CHWs. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, MEASURES: The two-part model estimated separate effects for the probability of using any CHW and extent of CHW full-time equivalents (FTEs) reported in those CHCs, using a total of 4102 CHC-year observations from 2016 to 2018. To estimate the extent to which increases in CHW workforce are attributable to real growth or rather are a consequence of a change in reporting category, we also conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to compare non-CHW enabling services FTEs between CHCs with and without CHWs before (2013-2015) and after (2016-2018) the reporting change in 2016. RESULTS: The rate of CHCs that employed CHWs rose from 20.04% in 2016 to 28.34% in 2018, while average FTEs stayed relatively flat (3.32 FTEs). Patient visit volume (larger CHCs) and grant funding (less reliant on federal but more reliant on private funding) were significant factors associated with CHW use. However, we found that a substantial portion of this growth was attributable to a change in UDS reporting categories. CONCLUSION: While we do not address the reasons why CHCs have been slow to use CHWs, our results point to substantial financial barriers associated with CHCs' expanding the use of CHWs.


Subject(s)
Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Workers/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/economics , Community Health Services/economics , Community Health Services/methods , Community Health Workers/economics , Community Health Workers/supply & distribution , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , United States
7.
J Surg Res ; 263: 258-264, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a growing deficit of rural surgeons, and preparation to meet this need is inadequate. More research into stratifying factors that specifically influence choice in rural versus urban practice is needed. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey related to factors influencing rural practice selection and increasing rural recruitment was distributed through the American College of Surgeons. The results were analyzed descriptively and thematically. RESULTS: Of 416 respondents (74% male), 287 (69%) had previous rural experience. Of those, 71 (25%) did not choose rural practice; lack of professional or hospital support (30%) and lifestyle (26%) were the primary reasons. A broad scope of practice was most important among surgeons (52%), who chose rural practice without any previous rural experience. Over 60% of urban practitioners agreed that improved lifestyle and financial advantages would attract them to rural practice. The thematic analysis suggested institutional support, affiliation with academic institutions, and less focus on subspecialty fellowship could help increase the number of rural surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors influence surgeons' decisions on practice location. Providing appropriate hospital support in rural areas and promoting specific aspects of rural practice, including broad scope of practice to those in training could help grow interest in rural surgery. Strong collaboration with academic institutions for teaching, learning, and mentoring opportunities for rural surgeons could also lead to higher satisfaction, security, and potentially higher retention rate. These results provide a foundation to help focus specific efforts and resources in the recruitment and retention of rural surgeons.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Career Choice , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/supply & distribution , Surgeons/psychology , Clinical Competence , Female , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Mentors/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Selection/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/economics , Surgeons/economics , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , United States
8.
J Surg Res ; 245: 587-592, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31499364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical disease increasingly contributes to global mortality and morbidity. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery found that global cost-effectiveness data are lacking for a wide range of essential surgical procedures. This study helps to address this gap by defining the cost-effectiveness of exploratory laparotomies in a regional referral hospital in Uganda. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A time-and-motion analysis was utilized to calculate operating theater personnel costs per case. Ward personnel, administrative, medication, and supply costs were recorded and calculated using a microcosting approach. The cost in 2018 US Dollars (USD, $) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted was calculated based on age-specific life expectancies for otherwise fatal cases. RESULTS: Data for 103 surgical patients requiring exploratory laparotomy at the Soroti Regional Referral Hospital were collected over 8 mo. The most common cause for laparotomy was small bowel obstruction (32% of total cases). The average cost per patient was $75.50. The postoperative mortality was 11.7%, and 7.8% of patients had complications. The average number of DALYs averted per patient was 18.51. The cost in USD per DALY averted was $4.08. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides evidence that exploratory laparotomy is cost-effective compared with other public health interventions. Relative cost-effectiveness includes a comparison with bed nets for malaria prevention ($6.48-22.04/DALY averted), tuberculosis, tetanus, measles, and polio vaccines ($12.96-25.93/DALY averted), and HIV treatment with multidrug antiretroviral therapy ($453.74-648.20/DALY averted). Given that the total burden of surgically treatable conditions in DALYs is more than that of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV combined, our findings strengthen the argument for greater investment in primary surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries/economics , Laparotomy/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Female , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Laparotomy/statistics & numerical data , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Regional Health Planning/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Uganda , Young Adult
9.
J Surg Res ; 246: 93-99, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ninety-four percent of congenital anomalies occur in low- and middle-income countries. In Uganda, only three pediatric surgeons and three pediatric anesthesiologists serve more than 20 million children. This study estimates burden, outcomes, coverage, and economic benefit of neonatal surgical conditions in Uganda. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was reviewed for neonatal surgical admissions from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, at the only two sites with specialist pediatric surgical coverage. Outcomes were compared with high-income countries. Met and unmet need were estimated using disability-adjusted life years. Economic benefit was estimated using a value of statistical life-year approach. RESULTS: For 1313 neonatal admissions, the median age of presentation was 3 d, overall mortality was 36%, and median distance traveled was 40 km. Anorectal malformations were most common (18%). Postoperative mortality was 24%. Mortality was significantly associated with surgical intervention (P < 0.0001). Met need was 4181 disability-adjusted life years per year, which corresponds to a $3.5 million net economic benefit to Uganda, with a potential additional benefit of $153 million if unmet need were fully addressed. Approximately 2% of the total need is met by the health care system. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal surgery is associated with improved survival for most conditions. Despite increases in workforce and infrastructure, a limited proportion of the need for neonatal surgery is currently being met. This is multifactorial, including lack of access to surgical care and severe shortages of workforce and infrastructure. Current and potential economic benefit to Uganda appears substantial.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/surgery , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Pediatric/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/economics , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Prospective Studies , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Surgical Procedures, Operative/economics , Survival Rate , Uganda/epidemiology
10.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 43, 2020 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513184

ABSTRACT

Many high- and middle-income countries face challenges in developing and maintaining a health workforce which can address changing population health needs. They have experimented with interventions which overlap with but have differences to those documented in low- and middle-income countries, where many of the recent literature reviews were undertaken. The aim of this paper is to fill that gap. It examines published and grey evidence on interventions to train, recruit, retain, distribute, and manage an effective health workforce, focusing on physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals in high- and middle-income countries. A search of databases, websites, and relevant references was carried out in March 2019. One hundred thirty-one reports or papers were selected for extraction, using a template which followed a health labor market structure. Many studies were cross-cutting; however, the largest number of country studies was focused on Canada, Australia, and the United States of America. The studies were relatively balanced across occupational groups. The largest number focused on availability, followed by performance and then distribution. Study numbers peaked in 2013-2016. A range of study types was included, with a high number of descriptive studies. Some topics were more deeply documented than others-there is, for example, a large number of studies on human resources for health (HRH) planning, educational interventions, and policies to reduce in-migration, but much less on topics such as HRH financing and task shifting. It is also evident that some policy actions may address more than one area of challenge, but equally that some policy actions may have conflicting results for different challenges. Although some of the interventions have been more used and documented in relation to specific cadres, many of the lessons appear to apply across them, with tailoring required to reflect individuals' characteristics, such as age, location, and preferences. Useful lessons can be learned from these higher-income settings for low- and middle-income settings. Much of the literature is descriptive, rather than evaluative, reflecting the organic way in which many HRH reforms are introduced. A more rigorous approach to testing HRH interventions is recommended to improve the evidence in this area of health systems strengthening.


Subject(s)
Developed Countries , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Personnel Management/methods , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Employee Performance Appraisal , Health Occupations/education , Health Occupations/standards , Health Personnel/education , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/standards , Humans , Personnel Management/economics , Personnel Selection/organization & administration , Workforce
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 206, 2020 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32164689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most European countries have implemented a form of school health services (SHS) to provide young children and adolescents with various types of healthcare. No estimations on SHS expenditure for European countries have been published until now. We estimated SHS workforce expenditure in Europe, expected to serve as the main driver of school healthcare costs. METHODS: Using two networks of experts on healthcare provision for children we contacted various country representatives to provide data on the number of professionals working in SHS and salaries. These data were used, together with publicly available data, to estimate annual SHS workforce expenditure on the national level. RESULTS: We received sufficient data for five European countries, and estimated the SHS workforce expenditure. Nurses were the most widely reported professionals working in this field, followed by doctors and psychologists. Our SHS expenditure estimations ranged from €43,000 for Estonia to €195,300 in Norway (per 1000 pupils). For Norway, Estonia, Finland and Iceland, school nurses were the main drivers of SHS expenditure, mainly due to their large numbers, while in Austria, school doctors played the largest role in SHS expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated the spending on SHS workforce for five European countries, which comprises relatively minor parts of total healthcare spending (0.16 to 0.69%). Many questions regarding SHS spending in Europe remain, due to a general lack of data on national levels.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/economics , School Health Services/economics , Adolescent , Child , Europe , Humans , School Health Services/organization & administration
12.
J Surg Res ; 239: 8-13, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782545

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: St. Boniface Hospital (SBH) plays a critical role in providing safe, accessible surgery in rural southern Haiti. We examine the impact of SBH increasing surgical capacity on case volume, patient complexity, and inpatient mortality across three phases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review and geospatial analysis of all surgical cases performed at SBH between 2015 and 2017 were performed. Inpatient mortality was defined by in-hospital deaths divided by the number of procedures performed. RESULTS: Between February 2015 and August 2017, over 2000 procedures were performed. The average number of surgeries per week was 3.1 with visiting surgical teams in phase 1 (P1), 10.4 with a single general surgeon in phase 2 (P2), and 20.1 with two surgeons and a resident in phase 3 (P3). There was a six-fold increase in surgical volume between P1 and P3 and a significant increase in case complexity. The distribution of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4 during P2 was 81.05%, 14.74%, 3.42%, and 0.79%, respectively, whereas in P3, the distribution was 68.91%, 22.55%, 7.70%, and 0.84%. Surgical mortality was 0%, 1.2%, and 1.67% across phases. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing resources and surgical staff at SBH allowed for greater delivery of safe surgical care. This study highlights that investing in surgery has a significant impact in regions of great surgical need.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Rural Health Services/trends , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Developing Countries , Haiti/epidemiology , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health Services/economics , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/trends
13.
Hum Resour Health ; 17(1): 72, 2019 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The feminisation of the global health workforce presents a unique challenge for human resource policy and health sector reform which requires an explicit gender focus. Relatively little is known about changes in the gender composition of the health workforce and its impact on drivers of global health workforce dynamics such as wage conditions. In this article, we use a gender analysis to explore if the feminisation of the global health workforce leads to a deterioration of wage conditions in health. METHODS: We performed an exploratory, time series analysis of gender disaggregated WageIndicator data. We explored global gender trends, wage gaps and wage conditions over time in selected health occupations. We analysed a sample of 25 countries over 9 years between 2006 and 2014, containing data from 970,894 individuals, with 79,633 participants working in health occupations (48,282 of which reported wage data). We reported by year, country income level and health occupation grouping. RESULTS: The health workforce is feminising, particularly in lower- and upper-middle-income countries. This was associated with a wage gap for women of 26 to 36% less than men, which increased over time. In lower- and upper-middle-income countries, an increasing proportion of women in the health workforce was associated with an increasing gender wage gap and decreasing wage conditions. The gender wage gap was pronounced in both clinical and allied health professions and over lower-middle-, upper-middle- and high-income countries, although the largest gender wage gaps were seen in allied healthcare occupations in lower-middle-income countries. CONCLUSION: These results, if a true reflection of the global health workforce, have significant implications for health policy and planning and highlight tensions between current, purely economic, framing of health workforce dynamics and the need for more extensive gender analysis. They also highlight the value of a more nuanced approach to health workforce planning that is gender sensitive, specific to countries' levels of development, and considers specific health occupations.


Subject(s)
Health Occupations/economics , Health Occupations/trends , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/trends , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/trends , Women , Female , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Professional Role
14.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 25 Suppl 2, Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey 2017: S87-S95, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30720621

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: This article examines factors related to earnings in the context of the governmental public health system's urgent need to recruit and retain trained public health workers as many in the existing workforce move toward retirement. METHODS: This article characterizes annualized earnings from state and local public health practitioners in 2017, using data from the 2017 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS), which was fielded in fall/winter 2017 to more than 100 000 state and local public health practitioners in the United States. The response consisted of 47 604 public health workers for a response rate of 48%.We performed descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and interval-based regression techniques to explore relationships between annualized earnings, supervisory status, gender, years of experience, highest degree (and whether it was a public health degree), job classification, race/ethnicity, union/bargaining unit, paid as salary or hourly wage, setting, and region. RESULTS: Higher supervisory status, higher educational attainment, white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, male gender, salaried employment, bargaining unit (labor union) position, certain geographic regions, having a clinical/laboratory/other scientific position, and working in either a state health agency (SHA) or a large local health department (LHD) setting are all associated with higher salary. Having a public health degree versus a degree in another area did not appear to increase earnings. Being a person of color was associated with earning $4000 less annually than white peers (P < .001), all else being equal. The overall regression model showed a gender wage gap of about $3000 for women (P = .018). Supervisors, clinical and laboratory staff, public health sciences staff, and union staff also earned more than their counterparts. DISCUSSION: As multiple factors continue to shape the public health workforce, including increasing racial/ethnic diversity, continued retirements of baby boomers, and the growth of bachelor's-level public health education, researchers should continue to monitor the gender and racial/ethnic pay gaps. This information should help the field of governmental public health as it endeavors to rebuild its capacity while current workers, many at the highest level of leadership, move on to retirement or other jobs. Public health leaders must prioritize equitable pay across gender and race/ethnicity within their own departments as they build their organizations' capacity to achieve health equity.


Subject(s)
Government Programs , Health Workforce/economics , Public Health/economics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/economics , United States
15.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(10): 1774-1779, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29971635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Broad consensus exists about the value and principles of primary care; however, little is known about the workforce configurations required to deliver it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the team configurations and associated costs required to deliver high-quality, comprehensive primary care. METHODS: We used a mixed-method and consensus-building process to develop staffing models based on data from 73 exemplary practices, findings from 8 site visits, and input from an expert panel. We first defined high-quality, comprehensive primary care and explicated the specific functions needed to deliver it. We translated the functions into full-time-equivalent staffing requirements for a practice serving a panel of 10,000 adults and then revised the models to reflect the divergent needs of practices serving older adults, patients with higher social needs, and a rural community. Finally, we estimated the labor and overhead costs associated with each model. RESULTS: A primary care practice needs a mix of 37 team members, including 8 primary care providers (PCPs), at a cost of $45 per patient per month (PPPM), to provide comprehensive primary care to a panel of 10,000 actively managed adults. A practice requires a team of 52 staff (including 12 PCPs) at $64 PPPM to care for a panel of 10,000 adults with a high proportion of older patients, and 50 staff (with 10 PCPs) at $56 PPPM for a panel of 10,000 with high social needs. In rural areas, a practice needs 22 team members (with 4 PCPs) at $46 PPPM to serve a panel of 5000 adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates provide health care decision-makers with needed guideposts for considering primary care staffing and financing and inform broader discussions on primary care innovations and the necessary resources to provide high-quality, comprehensive primary care in the USA.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , California , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel , Health Services Research/methods , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Models, Organizational , Patient Care Team/economics , Patient Care Team/standards , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care
16.
Anesth Analg ; 126(4): 1291-1297, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547423

ABSTRACT

The majority of the world's population lacks access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical care. Although there is a health workforce crisis across the board in the poorest countries in the world, anesthesia is disproportionally affected. This article explores some of the key issues that must be tackled to strengthen the anesthesia workforce in low- and lower-middle-income countries. First, we need to increase the overall number of safe anesthesia providers to match a huge burden of disease, particularly in the poorest countries in the world and in remote and rural areas. Through using a task-sharing model, an increase is required in both nonphysician anesthesia providers and anesthesia specialists. Second, there is a need to improve and support the competency of anesthesia providers overall. It is important to include a broad base of knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to manage complex and high-risk patients and to lead improvements in the quality of care. Third, there needs to be a concerted effort to encourage interprofessional skills and the aspects of working and learning together with colleagues in a complex surgical ecosystem. Finally, there has to be a focus on developing a workforce that is resilient to burnout and the challenges of an overwhelming clinical burden and very restricted resources. This is essential for anesthesia providers to stay healthy and effective and necessary to reduce the inevitable loss of human resources through migration and cessation of professional practice. It is vital to realize that all of these issues need to be tackled simultaneously, and none neglected, if a sustainable and scalable solution is to be achieved.


Subject(s)
Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Developing Countries , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Workforce , Anesthetists/economics , Anesthetists/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Career Choice , Clinical Competence , Cooperative Behavior , Developing Countries/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Needs Assessment , Patient Care Team
17.
Hum Resour Health ; 16(1): 59, 2018 11 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30413168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Historically, in an effort to evaluate and manage the rising cost of healthcare employers assess the direct cost burden via medical health claims and measures that yield clear data. Health related indirect costs are harder to measure and are often left out of the comprehensive overview of health expenses to an employer. Presenteeism, which is commonly referred to as an employee at work who has impaired productivity due to health considerations, has been identified as an indirect but relevant factor influencing productivity and human capitol. The current study evaluated presenteeism among employees of a large United States health care system that operates in six locations over a four-year period and estimated loss productivity due to poor health and its potential economic burden. METHODS: The Health-Related Productivity Loss Instrument (HPLI) was included as part of an online Health Risk Appraisal (HRA) administered to employees of a large United States health care system across six locations. A total of 58 299 HRAs from 22 893 employees were completed and analyzed; 7959 employees completed the HRA each year for 4 years. The prevalence of 22 specific health conditions and their effects on productivity areas (quantity of work, quality of work, work not done, and concentration) were measured. The estimated daily productivity loss per person, annual cost per person, and annual company costs were calculated for each condition by fitting marginal models using generalized estimating equations. Intra-participant agreement in reported productivity loss across time was evaluated using κ statistics for each condition. RESULTS: The health conditions rated highest in prevalence were allergies and hypertension (high blood pressure). The conditions with the highest estimated daily productivity loss and annual cost per person were chronic back pain, mental illness, general anxiety, migraines or severe headaches, neck pain, and depression. Allergies and migraines or severe headaches had the highest estimated annual company cost. Most health conditions had at least fair intra-participant agreement (κ ≥ 0.40) on reported daily productivity loss. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the current study suggested a variety of health conditions contributed to daily productivity loss and resulted in additional annual estimated costs for the health care system. To improve the productivity and well-being of their workforce, employers should consider presenteeism data when planning comprehensive wellness initiatives to curb productivity loss and increase employee health and well-being during working hours.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Costs and Cost Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Occupational Health/economics , Presenteeism/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/economics , Depression/epidemiology , Efficiency , Humans , Hypersensitivity/economics , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypertension/economics , Hypertension/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/economics , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Pain/economics , Pain/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Global Health ; 14(1): 98, 2018 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30333038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Skilled health professionals are a critical component of the effective delivery of lifesaving health interventions. The inadequate number of skilled health professionals in many low- and middle-income countries has been identified as a constraint to the achievement of improvements in health outcomes. In response, more international development agencies have provided funds toward broader health system initiatives and health workforce activities in particular. Nonetheless, estimates of the amount of donor funding targeting investments in human resources for health activities are few. METHODS: We utilize data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's annual database on development assistance for health. The estimates in the database are generated using data from publicly available databases that track development assistance. To estimate development assistance for human resources for health, we use keywords to identify projects targeted toward human resource processes. We track development for human resources for health from 1990 through 2016. We categorize the types of human-resources-related projects funded and examine the availability of human resources, development assistance for human resources for health, and disease burden. RESULTS: We find that the amount of donor funding directed toward human resources for health has increased from only $34 million in 1990 to $1.5 billion in 2016 (in 2017 US dollars). Overall, $18.5 billion in 2017 US dollars was targeted toward human resources for health between 1990 and 2016. The primary regions receiving these resources were sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania. The main donor countries were the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. The main agencies through which these resources were disbursed are non-governmental organizations (NGOs), US bilateral agencies, and UN agencies. CONCLUSION: In 2016, less than 4% of development assistance for health could be tied to funding for human resources. Given the central role skilled health workers play in health systems, in order to make credible progress in reducing disparities in health and attaining the goal of universal health coverage for all by 2030, it may be appropriate for more resources to be mobilized in order to guarantee adequate manpower to deliver key health interventions.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce/economics , International Cooperation , Africa South of the Sahara , Asia, Southeastern , Australia , Canada , Databases, Factual , Asia, Eastern , Humans , Oceania , United Kingdom , United States
19.
JAMA ; 329(14): 1145-1146, 2023 04 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821127

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint discusses the need for public funding for research that supports health workforce well-being and addresses occupational burnout among health care practitioners.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Health Workforce , Research Support as Topic , Working Conditions , Humans , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Health Workforce/economics , Working Conditions/economics , Working Conditions/psychology , Working Conditions/standards , Research Support as Topic/economics
20.
Indian J Public Health ; 62(3): 167-170, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232963

ABSTRACT

The realization of Universal Health Coverage requires adequate healthcare financing and human resources to provide financial protection to the economically disadvantaged population by covering their medicine, diagnostics, and service costs. Conventionally, inadequate public healthcare financing and the lack of skilled human resources are considered as the major barriers towards achieving UHC in India. To strengthen the Indian healthcare system, there has been significant increase budgetary allocation towards healthcare, a national health protection scheme targeting low-income households, upgrading of primary health-care and expansion of the health work-force. Nevertheless, an evolving paradigm for improving holistic health, sanitation, nutrition, gender equity, drug accessibility and affordability, innovative initiatives in national health programs for reduction of maternal deaths, tuberculosis and HIV burden and the utilization of information technology in healthcare provision of the underserved and the marginalized is gaining rapid acceleration. These represent a genuine innovation towards fulfillment of UHC goals for India.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce/organization & administration , Medical Assistance/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Workforce/economics , Health Workforce/standards , Holistic Health , Humans , India , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Public Health , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Sanitation/methods , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Universal Health Insurance/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL