ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have reported acceptable outcomes after arthrodesis takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, there are no reports on outcomes after oncologic resection, which are inherently complex and may portend poorer outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent prior hemipelvectomy for tumor resection and were later converted to THA. METHODS: All patients who had prior iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic resection that were later converted to THA at a single institution were examined. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, operative information, functional outcomes, and complications/reoperations. RESULTS: All three patients in this study were males who underwent internal hemipelvectomies for chondrosarcoma. Patients were converted to THA at a mean of 26 years after arthrodesis. Mean follow-up after conversion to THA was 7.4 years. During this follow-up period, two of the three patients required revision surgery. At last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 81 and the mean Mayo Hip Score was 67, and all patients were ambulatory without significant pain. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients who undergo iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic hemipelvectomy and are later converted to THA can expect to have a reasonable outcome, despite a high rate of complications and revision surgery.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hemipelvectomy , Male , Humans , Female , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Hip Joint/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Arthrodesis , Reoperation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Wide margin resection for pelvic tumors via internal hemipelvectomy is among the most technically challenging procedures in orthopedic oncology. As such, surgeon experience and technique invariably affect patient outcomes. The aim of this clinical study was to assess how an individual surgeon's experiences and advancements in technology and techniques in the treatment of internal hemipelvectomy have impacted patient outcomes at our institution. METHODS: This study retrospectively examined a single tertiary academic institution's consecutive longitudinal experience with internal hemipelvectomy for primary sarcoma or pelvic metastases over a 26-year period between the years 1994 and 2020. Outcomes were assessed using two separate techniques. The first stratified patients into cohorts based on the date of surgery with three distinct "eras" ("early," "middle," and "modern"), which reflect the implementation of new techniques, including three-dimensional (3D) computer navigation and cutting guide technology into our clinical practice. The second method of cohort selection grouped patients based on each surgeon's case experience with internal hemipelvectomy ("inexperienced," "developing," and "experienced"). Primary endpoints included margin status, complication profiles, and long-term oncologic outcomes. Whole group multivariate analysis was used to evaluate variables predicting blood loss, operative time, tumor-free survival, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy were identified. Of these patients, 24 had surgery between 1994 and 2007 (early), 28 between 2007 and 2015 (middle), and 20 between 2016 and 2020 (modern). Twenty-eight patients had surgery while the surgeon was still inexperienced, 24 while developing, and 20 when experienced. Evaluation by era demonstrated that a greater proportion of patients were indicated for surgery for oligometastatic disease in the modern era (0% vs. 14.3% vs. 35%, p = 0.022). Fewer modern cases utilized freehand resection (100% vs. 75% vs. 55%, p = 0.012), while instead opting for more frequent utilization of computer navigation (0% vs. 25% vs. 20%, p = 0.012), and customized 3D-printed cutting guides (0% vs. 0% vs. 25%, p = 0.002). Similarly, there was a decline in the rate of massive blood loss observed (72.2% vs. 30.8% vs. 35%, p = 0.016), and interdisciplinary collaboration with a general surgeon for pelvic dissection became more common (4.2% vs. 32.1% vs. 85%, p < 0.001). Local recurrence was less prevalent in patients treated in middle and modern eras (50% vs. 15.4% vs. 25%, p = 0.045). When stratifying by case experience, surgeries performed by experienced surgeons were less frequently complicated by massive blood loss (66.7% vs. 40% vs. 20%, p = 0.007) and more often involved a general surgeon for pelvic dissection (17.9% vs. 37.5% vs. 65%, p = 0.004). Whole group multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) predicted lower intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.040). However, surgeon experience had no significant effect on operative time (p = 0.125), tumor-free survival (p = 0.501), or overall patient survival (p = 0.735). CONCLUSION: While our institution continues to utilize neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies following current guideline-based care, we have noticed changing trends from early to modern periods. With the advent of new technologies, we have seen a decline in freehand resections for hemipelvectomy procedures, and a transition to utilizing more 3D navigation and customized 3D cutting guides. Furthermore, we have employed the use of an interdisciplinary team approach more regularly for these complicated cases. Although our results do not demonstrate a significant change in perioperative outcomes over the years, our institution's willingness to treat more complex cases likely obscures the benefits of surgeon experience and recent technological advances for patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Learning Curve , Retrospective Studies , Pelvis/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Bone Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Innovations in machined and three-dimensionally (3D) printed implant technology have allowed for customized complex pelvic reconstructions. We sought to determine the survivorship of custom hemipelvis reconstruction using ilium-only fixation at a minimum 2-year follow-up, their modes of failure, and the postoperative complications resulting from the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 12 consecutive patients treated with custom hemipelvis reconstruction. Indications for surgery were bone tumor requiring internal hemipelvectomy (four patients) or multiply revised, failed hip arthroplasty with massive bone loss (eight patients). All patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up with a mean of 60.5 months. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was determined for all patients. Postoperative complications and reoperations were categorized for all patients. RESULTS: At a mean of 60.5 months, 11 of 12 patients had retained their custom implant (92% survivorship). One implant was removed as a result of an acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There were no cases of aseptic loosening. Seven of 12 patients required reoperation (three PJI; two dislocations; two superficial wound complications), with five patients going on to reoperation-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Custom hemipelvis reconstruction utilizing an ilium monoflange provides durable short-term fixation at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Reoperation for infection and dislocation is common.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hemipelvectomy , Hip Prosthesis , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Acetabulum/surgery , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Ilium/surgery , Survivorship , Prosthesis Design , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are defined as major ablative amputations of the lower limb. Due to the small number of patients, little is known about the outcome and follow-up. AIMS: We aimed to assess (1) reasons for performed major ablative surgeries such as hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy in a German center for trauma and orthopedic surgery. (2) In addition, mortality and quality of life after hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy as well as (3) patient and treatment characteristics should be investigated. METHODS: During a period of twelve years, 15 patients underwent hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy. Mortality, EQ-5D-3L quality of life by EQ-5D-3L and time-trade-off (TTO), VAS, cause of disarticulation, length of hospital stays, revisions, comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and ASA score were evaluated retrospective for all patients. RESULTS: The overall mortality rates were 26.7% at 30 days, 60.0% after one year and 66.7% after three years. The five surviving patients reported about moderate problems in the EQ-5D-3L. The average VAS score reached 45 (range 15-65). The mean TTO was 9.8 (range 6-12). Indications for amputation were infection (n = 7), tumor (n = 6), trauma (n = 1) and ischemia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are followed by a high postoperative mortality. Quality of life of the affected patients is impaired in long-term follow-up. Especially amputations performed due to infections show high mortality within one month after surgery despite average young age and low CCI. Surgeons should be aware of this devastating outcome and extraordinary vigilant for these vulnerable patient cohorts.
Subject(s)
Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Disarticulation , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Amputation, SurgicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemipelvectomies are rare and serious injuries. The surgical management was described in several case studies, with primary amputation often performed to save the patient's life. METHODS: We report of two survivors with complete traumatic hemipelvectomy resulting in ischemia and paralyzed lower extremity. Due to modern emergency medicine and reconstructive surgery, limb salvage could be attained. Long-term outcome with quality of life was assessed one year after the initial accident. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The patients were able to mobilize themselves and live an independent life. The extremities remained without function and sensation. Urinary continence and sexual function were present and the colostomy could be relocated in both patients. Both patients support limb salvage, even having difficulties and follow-up treatments. Concomitant cases are required to consolidate the findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Subject(s)
Hemipelvectomy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Hemipelvectomy/methods , Limb Salvage , Quality of Life , Amputation, Surgical , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although internal hemipelvectomies with sacroiliac resections are not traditionally reconstructed, surgeons are increasingly pursuing pelvic ring reconstruction to theoretically improve stability, function, and early ambulation. This study aims to systematically compare complications and functional and oncologic outcomes of sacroiliac resection with and without reconstruction. METHODS: PubMed and MEDLINE were queried for studies published between January 1990 and October 2020 pertaining to sacroiliac neoplasm resection with subsequent reconstruction. Patient demographics, histopathologic diagnoses, reconstruction techniques, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scores, and oncologic outcomes were pooled. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (201 patients) were included for analysis. Reconstruction was performed in 79.1% of patients, most commonly with nonvascularized autografts (45.8%). The overall complication rate was 54.8%; however, resection followed by reconstruction demonstrated significantly higher complication (62.3% versus 25.7%, p < 0.001) and infection rates (13.7% versus 0%, p = 0.020). Mean MSTS functional score trended higher in nonreconstructed patients (82% versus 71.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction after sacroiliac resection produced higher complication rates and poorer physical recovery when compared with nonreconstructed resection. This systematic review suggests that patients without spinopelvic junction instability may experience superior outcomes without reconstruction. Ultimately, the need to reconstruct the pelvic girdle depends on tumor size, prognosis, and functional goals.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Hemipelvectomy , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Osteotomy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During pelvic Sarcoma resections, Surgeons often struggle to obtain negative margins while minimizing collateral damage and maintaining limb function. These complications are usually due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis. Here we present an accurate 3D surgical approach, including pre-operative printing of models and intraoperative patient-specific instruments (PSIs) for optimizing pelvic sarcoma resections. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study (N = 11) presents surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients (average age 14.6 +/- 7.6 years, 4 males) who underwent pelvic sarcoma resections using a 3D surgical approach between 2016 and 2021. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months (mean = 38.9 +/- 30.1 months). RESULTS: Our results show promising surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes. Using a 3D approach, 90.9% had negative margins, and 63.6% did not require reconstruction surgery. The average estimated blood loss was 895.45 ± 540.12 cc, and the average surgery time was 3:38 ± 0.05 hours. Our results revealed no long-term complications. Three patients suffered from short-term complications of superficial wound infections. At 24 month follow up 72.7% of patients displayed no evidence of disease. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at 12 months was 22.81. CONCLUSION: 3D technology enables improved accuracy in tumor resections, allowing for less invasive procedures and tailored reconstruction surgeries, potentially leading to better outcomes in function and morbidity. We believe that this approach will enhance treatments and ease prognosis for patients diagnosed with pelvic sarcoma and will become the standard of care in the future.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Hemipelvectomy , Osteosarcoma , Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Hemipelvectomy/methods , Limb Salvage , Retrospective Studies , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Osteosarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Osteosarcoma/surgery , Sarcoma/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Margins of ExcisionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic ring reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy is an extremely challenging surgical procedure, and mandatory reconstruction is to provide a durable and pain-free functional outcome, especially for young, active patients. One of the most widely employed techniques is reconstruction with a double-barreled fibular free flap (DBF). The aim of our work was an in-depth analysis of the outcome of pelvic ring reconstruction performed using the above-mentioned method, in particular looking for a correlation between the fixation technique and either ambulation status or complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed in November 2020 using PubMed and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Studies were published between 1994 and 2015. A DBF was used in each case, with a total of 30 patients. Reconstruction was performed with screws in 13 cases, Cotrel-Dubousset rod fixation in 6, screws and plate in 5, screws with external fixation in 4, and ISOLA in 2. Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 131 months. Functional outcome was excellent in 4 patients and good in 26 patients. Statistical analysis showed no statistical evidence of existing correlation between fixation technique and complications (p = .873), while statistical correlation between age and fixation technique was found (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of pelvic ring with DBF provides an overall good functional outcome. Our data indicate that there is no statistical evidence of existing correlation between the fixation technique and either complications or ambulation status.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Free Tissue Flaps , Hemipelvectomy , Pelvic Bones , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Hemipelvectomy/methods , Humans , Pelvic Bones/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyze the midterm outcomes of LUMiC® endoprosthetic reconstruction following periacetabular resection of primary bone sarcomas and carcinoma metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 21 patients (11 male [52.3%], 10 female [47.6%]; mean age 47 ± 16 years) for whom a LUMiC® endoprosthesis (Implantcast) was used to reconstruct a periacetabular defect after internal hemipelvectomy. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as Ewing's sarcoma in six (28.5%), chondrosarcoma in 10 (47.6%), and bone metastasis from carcinoma in five (23.8%) patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients was 57.8 months (95% confidence interval: 51.9-63.7). The implant survival rate at 1, 2, and 5 years were 95.2%, 85.7%, and 80.9%, respectively. The overall complication rate was 33.3% (n = 7). Four (19%) complications resulted in reconstruction failure. Total reoperation rate was 28.5% (n = 6). The complications were soft tissue failure/dislocation in two patients, aseptic loosening in one, infection in two, and local recurrence in two. At the time of study, seven patients were alive with no evidence of disease, seven were alive with disease, and seven died of disease. The 5-year overall survival rate and local recurrence-free survival rates were 67% and 76%, respectively. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score at final follow-up was 70% (range: 50%-86.6%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that LUMiC® endoprosthesis provides good functional outcomes and a durable reconstruct. Even though this reconstruction method presents some complications, it provides a stable pelvis in the management of periacetabular malignant tumors.
Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Chondrosarcoma/surgery , Osteotomy/mortality , Pelvic Bones/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/mortality , Acetabulum/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Chondrosarcoma/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemipelvectomy/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Bones/pathology , Prognosis , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to decrease or prevent neuropathic pain, including phantom and residual limb pain, after extremity amputation. Currently, a paucity of data and lack of anatomical description exists regarding TMR in the setting of hemipelvectomy and/or hip disarticulations. We elaborate on the technique of TMR, illustrated through cadaveric and clinical correlates. METHODS: Cadaveric dissections of multiple transpelvic exposures were performed. The major mixed motor and sensory nerve branches were identified, dissected, and tagged. Amputated peripheral nerves were transferred to identified, labeled target motor nerves via direct end-to-end nerve coaptations per traditional TMR technique. A retrospective review was completed by our multi-institutional teams to include examples of clinical correlates for TMR performed in the setting of hemipelvectomies and hip disarticulations. RESULTS: A total of 12 TMR hemipelvectomy/hip disarticulation cases were performed over a 2 to 3-year period (2018-2020). Of these 12 cases, 9 were oncologic in nature, 2 were secondary to traumatic injury, and 1 was a failed limb salvage in the setting of chronic refractory osteomyelitis of the femoral shaft. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript outlines the technical considerations for TMR in the setting of hemipelvectomy and hip disarticulation with supporting clinical case correlates.
Subject(s)
Amputees/rehabilitation , Disarticulation/methods , Hemipelvectomy/methods , Muscles/innervation , Muscles/surgery , Phantom Limb/prevention & control , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to present our experience using free fillet flaps to reconstruct massive oncologic defects of the upper and lower extremity. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to include patients who underwent oncologic resection followed by reconstruction using free fillet flaps from July 2001 to October 2018. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients were identified and included in this study. Mean age was 48.9 years old. Five patients had extended forequarter amputations and seven patients had external hemipelvectomies, all for locally advanced tumors. Mean tumor size was 15 ± SD 6.4 cm, and negative tumor margins were achieved in all the patients. Mean flap size was 1028 ± SD 869 cm2 . The mean follow-up was 13 months. There were no partial or total flap losses in the postoperative period. Two patients had flap-related postoperative complications, including flap bleeding and wound dehiscence. Median survival was 18 months. CONCLUSION: The free fillet flap is a safe, reliable, and valuable approach for reconstructing oncological defects. It offers the advantage of avoiding donor site morbidity, while providing extensive soft-tissue coverage as a one-step solution for massive oncologic defects.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps/statistics & numerical data , Lower Extremity/surgery , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications , Surgical Flaps/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Hemipelvectomy/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Plastic Surgery Procedures/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Internal hemipelvectomy is a complex procedure used to treat malignancy that involves the pelvis. Reconstruction of the pelvis after type I or type I/IV resection remains controversial due to high complication rates and debatable functional benefit. Modern reconstruction options may provide a rapid, intuitive, and reliable way to reconstitute the pelvic ring. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of four patients who underwent a novel reconstruction method involving computer navigation and segmental spinal instrumentation applied to the pelvis after type I or type I/IV pelvic resection for malignancy between 2015 and 2020. RESULTS: Time to ambulation postoperatively ranged from 1 to 7 days, and median length of hospital stay was 8.5 (7.5, 10.5) days. Complications included wound necrosis in two patients that did not require reoperation and wound infection in one patient that required irrigation and debridement. There was no radiographic evidence of hardware loosening or failure on follow-up. Three patients remain alive and two remain disease-free. At most recent follow-up, all patients were able to ambulate and perform activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: The technique for pelvic reconstruction described allows for rapid fixation intraoperatively with few complications and satisfactory functional results in this limited series.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Hemipelvectomy/methods , Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Functional reconstruction after resection of pelvic malignancies involving the acetabulum remains challenging. Numerous reconstruction methods have been proposed, but they are generally associated with mechanical and nonmechanical complications. To improve the function of patients with primary malignancies of the acetabulum after internal hemipelvectomy and reduce the complication rate after this procedure, we designed a series of three-dimensionally (3D) printed, custom-made, integrative hemipelvic endoprostheses with a porous structure and wanted to present the early results of using this construct to determine whether it could be considered a reasonable reconstruction option. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed this study to (1) evaluate, in a small group of patients, whether the new endoprosthesis restores short-term lower-limb function; (2) identify short-term complications associated with the use of this endoprosthesis; and (3) assess osseointegration between the host bone and the 3D-printed integrative hemipelvic endoprosthesis with a porous structure. METHODS: Between October 2016 and May 2017, our center treated 26 patients with malignancies involving the acetabulum. Thirteen of these patients received hemipelvic replacement with a 3D-printed, custom-made, integrative endoprosthesis, six received hemipelvic replacement with a modular endoprosthesis, four received radiotherapy, and three received external hemipelvectomy. Resection and reconstruction with a 3D-printed, custom-made, integrative endoprosthesis were indicated if the resection margin was the same as that achieved in hemipelvectomy, if reconstruction would preserve reasonable function after resection, if the patient had a good physical status and life expectancy longer than 6 months, and if the patient was willing to accept the potential risk of a 3D-printed, custom-made, endoprosthesis. The exclusion criteria were an inability to achieve a satisfactory surgical margin with limb salvage, inability to preserve the function of the limb because of tumor involvement of the sacral nerve or sciatic nerve, and unresectable and/or widely metastatic disease on presentation. Pain and function were evaluated with the 10-cm VAS score (range 0 to 10; a lower score is desirable), the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score (range 0 to 30; a higher score is desirable), and the Harris hip score ([HHS]; range 0 to 100; a higher score is desirable) were evaluated preoperatively and at a median of 27 months after reconstruction (range 24 to 31 months). The functional scores and complications were recorded after reviewing the patients' records. Osseointegration was assessed with digital tomosynthesis by two senior surgeons. We observed the trabecular structures connected to the implant surface to assess whether there was good osseointegration. RESULTS: The median preoperative VAS score, MSTS-93 score, and HHS were 5 (range 2 to 8), 14 (range 3 to 18), and 64 (range 20 to 76) points, respectively. At the latest follow-up interval, the median VAS score, MSTS-93 score, and HHS were 2 (range 0 to 6), 23 (range 15 to 27), and 82 (range 44 to 93) points, respectively. No deep infection, dislocation, endoprosthetic breakage, aseptic loosening, or local recurrence occurred. Two patients experienced delayed wound healing; the wounds healed after débridement. Using digital tomography, we found that all implants were well-osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-printed, custom-made, integrative hemipelvic endoprosthesis provides acceptable early outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic reconstruction. Osseointegration is possible, and we anticipate this will lead to biologic stability with a longer follow-up interval. The custom-made integrative design ensured precise implantation. Although a few patients in this study had only a short follow-up duration, the functional results were reasonable. We have observed no major complications so far, but this was a very small series and we caution that these are large reconstructions that will certainly result in complications for some patients. Our method uses a precise preoperative simulation and endoprosthesis design to aid the surgeon in performing challenging operations. If our early results are confirmed with more patients and longer follow-up and are replicated at other centers, this may be a reconstruction option for patients with periacetabular malignancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Hemipelvectomy , Patient-Specific Modeling , Pelvic Bones/surgery , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prosthesis Design , Sarcoma/surgery , Acetabulum/pathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Bones/pathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recovery of Function , Sarcoma/pathology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Pelvic sarcoma resections present large and complex defects, which are a challenge to reconstruct. At times, these cancers are treated with external hemipelvectomy, and both the soft tissue and bony framework of the pelvic ring must be addressed. The purpose of this case report is to describe the use of a free tibia and fibula-fillet-of-leg flap for pelvic ring reconstruction, performed to enhance the quality of life of a patient following hemipelvectomy. A 50-year-old female with advanced stage undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the left thigh and pelvis underwent free vascularized tibia and fibula-fillet-of-leg flap, including 21 cm of bone length and 21 cm long and full circumferential soft tissues of the leg, accompanying the bone, for the reconstruction of the bony pelvis and soft tissue. Postoperatively, the patient had no surgical complications, was followed for 6 months and went on to have bony healing, and was able to sit prior to disease progression and eventual death from metastatic disease. In the reported case, we have shown that composite tibia-fibula free flap with lower leg soft tissues may be a viable option for the reconstruction of massive external hemipelvectomy defects.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Sarcoma/surgery , Female , Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Middle Aged , Pelvic Neoplasms/pathology , Sarcoma/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Partial pelvic resection, internal hemipelvectomy or sacrectomy as a result of bone sarcoma is still challenging. No matter what kind of reconstruction is used, there is still a much higher rate of complications in pelvic surgery compared to sarcoma surgery of the long bones. OBJECTIVES: We describe the most common complications in pelvic sarcoma surgery and specific complications related to the reconstruction method. Handling strategies for these complications are specified. METHODS: We performed a literature search and report our own experiences in the troubleshooting of pelvic surgery-related complications to gain an up-to-date overview of the state-of-the-art in management strategies. RESULTS: Prospective randomized trials or meta-analyses on this topic are lacking. The literature search depicted that, besides local recurrence, deep infection after reconstruction is the most serious complication. An early revision with radical debridement has to be performed in order to save the reconstruction. In the case of a deep infection, the removal of all implants with a total loss of the reconstruction is often unavoidable. Therefore, an individualized risk-benefit analysis prior to surgery with respect to the type of reconstruction, or no reconstruction at all (hip transposition), together with the patient is advisable. CONCLUSIONS: Complications-especially infections-after hemipelvectomy or sacrectomy are common. In the case of infection, in some cases, an early revision is the only chance to prevent a reconstruction from explantation.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Pelvic Neoplasms , Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pelvic Bones , Prospective Studies , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A 13-year-old cat underwent an extensive caudal external hemipelvectomy to excise a soft tissue sarcoma affecting the left proximal thigh. The cranial tibial fascia was harvested from the ipsilateral limb following amputation and used as a free graft in the reconstruction of the resultant pelvic and abdominal wall defect. Wound healing was uncomplicated, and 6 months following surgery there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or loss of integrity of the abdominal wall or lateral rectal support. Key clinical message: The cranial tibial fascia appears to be an effective autograft tissue for reconstructive surgery and may be applicable for closure of extensive hemipelvectomy procedures performed for tumors affecting the femoral region.
Autogreffe de fascia tibial crânial pour la fermeture de plaie à la suite d'une hémipelvectomie chez un chat. Un chat âgé de 13 ans a subi une hémipelvectomie caudale extensive afin d'exciser un sarcome des tissus mous affectant la cuisse proximale gauche. Le fascia tibial crânial fut prélevé du membre ipsilatéral suite à l'amputation et utilisé pour la greffe dans la reconstruction du défaut restant de la paroi abdominale et pelvienne. La guérison de la plaie s'est faite sans complication, et 6 mois suite à la chirurgie il n'y avait aucune évidence de récurrence de la tumeur ou de perte d'intégrité de la paroi abdominale ou du support rectal latéral.Message clinique important :Le fascia tibial crânial semble être un tissu d'autogreffe approprié lors de chirurgie reconstructive et pourrait être applicable pour la fermeture de procédures d'hémipelvectomie extensive réalisées lorsque des tumeurs affectent la région fémorale.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).
Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Hemipelvectomy/veterinary , Plastic Surgery Procedures/veterinary , Animals , Autografts , Cats , Fascia , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/veterinary , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bone sarcoma survivors face a number of physical and psychosocial challenges in relation to the late effects they experience following treatment. The present study aimed to identify and explore the different trajectories that bone sarcoma survivors might navigate during follow-up. METHODS: In-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted, and an inductive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: When they were interviewed three to ten years after the primary diagnosis, the eighteen bone cancer survivors were found to be in three different rehabilitation phases that followed fairly distinct trajectories, namely, back to normal, a new normal and still struggling. Only three participants felt that they had returned to a life that was quite similar to the one they had lived prior to having cancer. Fifteen participants considered their lives and their bodies to be significantly altered. CONCLUSION: Sarcoma survivors who undergo life-changing treatment and return to very different lives than they had before should be identified by healthcare professionals and guided through this demanding phase to better cope with their new living conditions. Information on and tailored guidance related to psychosocial challenges may be of particular importance. Active focus on reorientation, as well as possibilities for growth, seems to be important.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/psychology , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Chondrosarcoma/psychology , Osteosarcoma/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents , Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Chondrosarcoma/physiopathology , Chondrosarcoma/therapy , Cognition , Fatigue , Female , Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , Norway , Orthopedic Procedures , Osteosarcoma/physiopathology , Osteosarcoma/therapy , Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological , Qualitative Research , Radiotherapy , Sarcoma, Ewing/physiopathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/psychology , Sarcoma, Ewing/therapy , Social Participation , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We attempted to resect peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis with clear margins. Because of the proximity of vessels or organs, there is still concern that narrow surgical margins may have an adverse effect on disease outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend resection of histologic Grade II or Grade III chondrosarcomas with a "wide" margin, there are no specific recommendations for the adequate width of a surgical margin. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the disease-specific and local recurrence-free survival of patients with peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis treated with resection or amputation? (2) Is the width of a surgical margin associated with the outcome of disease in patients with peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis? (3) Does the histologic grade as determined with a preoperative biopsy correlate with the final grade after resection? (4) What are surgical complications in these patients? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from three international collaborating hospitals. Between 1983 and 2017, we resected 262 pelvic chondrosarcomas of all types. After reviewing the pathologic reports of these patients, we included 52 patients with peripheral chondrosarcomas of the pelvis who had an osteochondroma-like lesion at the base of the tumor and a cartilage cap with malignant cells in resected specimens. To be eligible for this study, a patient had to have a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Two patients were excluded because they had less than 1 year of follow-up, leaving 50 patients for inclusion in this study. The median follow-up duration was 7.0 years (interquartile range 2.1-10 years). The median age was 37 years (IQR 29-54 years). The ilium was the most frequently affected bone (in 36 of 50 patients; 72%). The histologic status of the surgical margin was defined as microscopically positive (0 mm), negative < 1 mm, or negative ≥ 1 mm. Thirteen of the 50 patients (26%) had local recurrence. Seven of 34 patients had Grade I tumors, five of 13 had Grade II tumors, and one of three had a Grade III tumor. Nine of 16 patients had multiple local recurrences. Two patients with Grade I tumors and two with Grade II tumors died because of pressure effects caused by local recurrence. RESULTS: The 10-year disease-specific and local recurrence-free survival rates were 90% (95% confidence interval, 70-97) and 69% (95% CI, 52-81), respectively. A surgical margin ≥ 1 mm (n = 16) was associated with a better local recurrence-free survival rate than a surgical margin < 1 mm (n = 17) or 0 mm (n = 11) (10-year local recurrence-free survival: resection margin ≥ 1 mm = 100% versus < 1 mm = 52% [95% CI, 31 to 70]; p = 0.008). No patients with a surgical margin ≥ 1 mm had local recurrence, metastasis, or disease-related death, irrespective of tumor grade. Patients with local recurrence (n = 13) showed worse disease-specific survival than those without local recurrence (n = 37) (10-year disease-specific survival: local recurrence [+] = 59% [95% CI, 16 to 86] versus local recurrence [-] = 100%; p=0.001]). The preoperative biopsy results correctly determined the tumor grade in 15 of 41 patients (37%). The most frequent complication after surgery was local recurrence (13 of 50 patients, 26%). Deep infection was the most frequent nononcologic complication (four patients). CONCLUSIONS: We found a high local recurrence rate after surgical treatment of a peripheral pelvic chondrosarcoma, which was related to the width of the surgical margin. These local recurrences led to inoperable recurrent tumors and death. The tumor grade as determined by preoperative biopsy was inaccurate in 2/3 of patients compared with the final histologic assessment. Therefore, we believe every attempt should be made to achieve a negative margin during the initial resection to lessen the likelihood of local recurrence of peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis of all grades. A margin of 1 mm or more appeared to be sufficient in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Chondrosarcoma/surgery , Margins of Excision , Pelvic Bones , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Chondrosarcoma/mortality , Chondrosarcoma/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hemipelvectomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The choice of reconstructive procedure to restore limb function is challenging after internal hemipelvectomy. Hip transposition arthroplasty, also known as resection arthroplasty, removes a malignant or aggressive tumor of the pelvis and acetabulum after which the remaining femoral head is moved proximally to the lateral surface side of the sacrum or the underside of the resected ilium after internal hemipelvectomy. It may provide reasonable functional results and have some advantages such as lowering the risk of an infected implant compared with other reconstructions because no foreign implants are used. Hip transposition is generally managed with prolonged bed rest or immobilization postoperatively to stabilize the soft tissue surrounding the remaining femur. Because enabling patients to be mobile while the soft tissues heal might be advantageous, we reviewed our experience with an external fixation for this procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does temporary external fixation facilitate postoperative physiotherapy in patients who undergo hip transposition arthroplasty? (2) What functional Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were achieved at short term in a small series of patients treated with hip transposition and temporary external fixation? (3) What were the complications of using external fixation in a small series of patients who received it for malignant tumors? METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012, we treated seven patients (three men and four women; median age, 37 years; age range, 18-53 years) with acetabular resection for malignant bone tumors; all were managed with a hip transposition, initially stabilized using external fixation. No other types of procedures were used for this indication in this period. Minimum followup in this retrospective study was 45 months, except for one patient who died at 18 months (range of followup duration, 18-90 months; median followup, 57 months), and no patients were lost to followup. The pins for external fixation were inserted into the affected side of the femur and the healthy contralateral ilium. External fixation was removed 6 weeks postoperatively and weightbearing was started at that time. Preoperative chemotherapy was administrated in four patients, but postoperative chemotherapy was delayed since it was given after external fixation removal in three patients. The postoperative rehabilitation course and functional results were assessed by chart review, functional results were determined using MSTS scores, tallied by physiotherapists who were not part of the surgical team, and complications were ascertained through chart review. Major complications were defined as complications that were treated with additional operations, such as deep infection, or ones that could cause severe postoperative dysfunction, such as nerve injury. RESULTS: With temporary external fixation, standing next to a bed was achieved in median 7 days (range, 6-9 days) postoperatively, transferring to a wheel chair in median 8 days (range, 6-28 days), and gait training using parallel bars in median 15 days (range, 7-48 days). At most recent followup, three patients could walk without a crutch or cane, three could walk with a cane, and one could walk with a crutch. The median MSTS score at most recent followup (median, 57 months) was 63%. Two patients had complications that resulted in reoperations; one had a wound dehiscence, and one had an abdominal herniation that gradually developed, and which was reconstructed using polypropylene mesh 2 years after pelvic resection. Two patients had nerve palsies that recovered by the end of the first year. All patients had pin tract infections that resolved with nonsurgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Hip transposition with temporary external fixation can stabilize the bone soft tissue after pelvic resection. Although we did not have a comparison group of patients, we believe that external fixation facilitates early postoperative physiotherapy and rehabilitation and provides good functional results without major surgical complications. Because it delays the resumption of chemotherapy, more patients with longer followup are needed to determine whether this will be associated with poorer oncologic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Arthroplasty , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , External Fixators , Hip Joint/surgery , Joint Instability/prevention & control , Osteotomy , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/pathology , Acetabulum/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Arthroplasty/adverse effects , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology , Female , Hemipelvectomy , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/pathology , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/etiology , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Physical Therapy Modalities , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Solitary bone metastasis from testicular tumor is rare. In literature, only few cases of isolated bone metastasis at first presentation have been reported, and none of them have been treated with extended surgery of the pelvic bone. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 33-year-old man with an iliac bone osteolytic metastasis as the first presentation of a non-seminomatous germ-cell testis tumor (NSGCT), treated with post-chemotherapy en bloc resection of residual tumor in the left iliac bone (Type I + II internal hemipelvectomy). After a 72-month follow-up, the patient has been asymptomatic, with no signs of local recurrence or metastasis and negative serum tumor markers. Conclusions: In selected cases, testicular NSGCT with iliac bone metastasis and normal or normalizing tumor markers can be treated, in association with chemotherapy, by extended surgery, including bone resection, to obtain gain in survival and maintain limb function.