Hemorrhoidal disease among doctors from grade-A tertiary hospitals in big cities of China: results from web-based doctors as patients survey.

BACKGROUND: Doctors are at high risk of developing hemorrhoidal disease (HD), but it is unclear whether doctors are aware of this risk. The OASIS (dOctors AS patIentS) study was performed to examine the prevalence, awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of HD among doctors in big cities in China. METHODS: An online survey consisting of a structured questionnaire was carried out among doctors in grade-A tertiary hospitals in 29 provinces across China from August to October 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1227 questionnaire responses were collected. HD prevalence was 56.8%, with a significant difference between internists and surgeons (P = 0.01). 15.6% of doctors with HD didn't have serious concerns about the recurrence and severity of HD. 91.5% of doctors adopted general treatments, and 83.0% considered oral medications only when topical medications were ineffective. Among the oral medications, Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (MPFF) was most effective based on the scores from three important parameters, but only 17% of doctors received MPFF. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors are at higher risk of developing HD with a high prevalence among Chinese doctors, but they are not fully aware or not concerned about HD. There is a deficiency in treatment recommendations and clinical management of HD even for doctors, including late initiation and inadequate oral drug therapy. Therefore, awareness and standardized treatment of HD should be improved among Chinese doctors, as well as in the general population.

Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sclerotherapy methods for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) over the past 40 years. METHODS: The review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including studies reporting the use of sclerotherapy in patients with HD. Study eligibility criteria were defined, and data were extracted independently by the authors. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Out of 1965 records identified, 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 9729 patients. The majority of studies were conducted in Japan, followed by the UK, Italy, and Portugal. The median age of participants was 52 years, and the majority were male. The Goligher grade distribution indicated varying degrees of HD severity. Sclerotherapy was predominantly administered through anoscopy, with polidocanol being the most commonly used agent. The procedure was generally performed without pre-injection analgesia. The meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) revealed that sclerotherapy was not inferior to control interventions in terms of success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the safety and efficacy of sclerotherapy for HD, which yields similar success rates and fewer complications compared to other conservative or surgical approaches. Further research is warranted to optimize sclerotherapy techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023396910.

Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and efficacy of Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. METHODS: Our study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) 2020. Primary endpoints included overall recurrence and type of recurrence while secondary endpoints included postoperative complications, reintervention, presence of rectal ulcer, rectal stricture, defecation abnormalities and perianal abscess. Α regression analysis, where the percentage of patients with grade II, III and IV hemorrhoidal disease was used as a covariate, was also performed. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 4249 patients met all the inclusion criteria and were eventually included. The crude and pooled estimates of the overall recurrence and complications by the end of follow-up were 10% (95% CI, 6.52%-14.08%) and 5.20% (95% CI, 2.59%-8.52%), respectively. Regression analysis displayed no correlation between recurrence and the grade of hemorrhoid disease II, ß= -0.0012 (95% CI, -0.0074 to 0.0049) (p = .64), grade III ß= -0.0006 (95% CI, -0.0056 to 0.0045) (p = .79) and grade IV ß = 0.0025 (95% CI, -0.0075 to 0.0124). However, a trend suggestive of increased recurrence was observed in patient populations with a higher proportion of grade IV disease. CONCLUSION: ALTA sclerotherapy may be a safe and viable alternative for patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Long-term follow-up and high-quality randomized controlled trials will help define the place of ALTA sclerotherapy in the armamentarium of treatment of hemorrhoids.

[Clinical analysis of percutaneous superselective superior rectal artery embolization for grades â ¡-â ¢ internal hemorrhoids].

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous superselective superior rectal artery embolization in the treatment of grades Ⅱ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids. Methods: The clinical data of 22 patients with grades Ⅱ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids who underwent superselective superior rectal artery embolization in the Department of Interventional and Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapy of the Second Hospital of Shandong University from September 2019 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the blood supply artery of hemorrhoids, superselective embolization was performed with embolization materials. The surgical efficacy,postoperative complications,and 12-month follow-up results were analyzed. The clinical score data (French bleeding score,quality of life score,prolapse score) were expressed using the median (Q1, Q3). The clinical scores before and after treatment were compared by the nonparametric rank sum test (Wilcoxon test),and the Z-value was calculated. P-values <0.05 indicate statistically significant differences. Results: The operation was successful in all 22 patients (technical success rate: 100%). The main postoperative side effects and complications included tenesmus (81.8%,18/22),anal bulge (68.2%,15/22),and mild pain in the anus (22.7%,5/22). The above reactions were improved 3-5 days after operation; three patients had congestion and dull pain at the puncture site,which improved spontaneously without treatment. The patients were followed up for 12 months. Compared with those prior to operation, the French bleeding score,quality of life score,and prolapse score were significantly improved (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Superselective superior rectal artery embolization is a relatively safe and low-risk treatment for grades Ⅱ-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids. It is an option for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids,particularly hemorrhagic internal hemorrhoids.

Catheter-directed hemorrhoidal embolization for rectal bleeding due to hemorrhoids (Goligher grade I-III): prospective outcomes from a Spanish emborrhoid registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed hemorrhoidal embolization (CDHE) by microcoil embolization for rectal bleeding due to hemorrhoids classified as Goligher grade I-III. METHODS: Eighty patients (62.5% males) with a mean age of 48 ± 9 years were recruited prospectively. All patients had symptomatic bleeding hemorrhoids. All patients were classified according to Goligher classification: grade I (13.7%), grade II (71.1%), grade III (15%), and no grade IV were recruited in this study. In all cases, microcoils were used to embolize the superior rectal artery(SRA), and microspheres if recurrence of bleeding occurred. Follow-up evaluation (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included clinical examination and anoscopy. A questionnaire was conducted to determine improvement regarding bleeding, quality of life before, and the degree of patient satisfaction of each participant. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases. Fifty-five (68.7%) participants had the absence of rectal bleeding after 12 months of embolization. VAS and QL improved 4 points and 1.5 respectively after embolization. A total of 25/80 (31.3%) had a recurrence in rectal bleeding. Seventeen (21.3%) patients underwent a second embolization, and four patients (5%) were treated with open hemorrhoidectomy. No major complications were observed. Sixteen participants had minor complications. Subjective post-treatment symptom and QL surveys showed significant differences from the baseline survey. Likewise, the degree of satisfaction in the telephone survey at 12 months revealed a high degree of patient satisfaction (8.3±1.1). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that CDHE is a feasible, well-tolerated, ambulatory, anal sphincter-sparing procedure for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CDHE is a simple procedure, well tolerated and accepted by patients, that preserves the anal sphincter and presents few complications when metal devices or microspheres are used as embolic agents. KEY POINTS: • The technical success rate of CDHE, defined as the closure of all the SRA in their distal segment, was achieved 100% of all patients. However, a second embolization treatment was required since 21.25% of the patients experienced rectal bleeding. • Overall, CDHE's safety profile is acceptable. After the procedure and 1 year of follow-up, no significant complications were observed. • Encouraging clinical outcomes have demonstrated CDHE in individuals with hemorrhoids and mild prolapse Goligher grades I-III with persistent rectal bleeding.

Outcomes of Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization from a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Interventional Center.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of outpatient transarterial embolization for symptomatic refractory internal hemorrhoids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 134 patients who underwent hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids between August 2021 and June 2022 (76 men and 58 women) was performed. The mean age was 54.9 years, with a mean Goligher hemorrhoid grade (HG) of 2.1. Branches of the superior rectal artery (SRA) or middle rectal artery supplying the corpus cavernosum recti were embolized with both spherical particles and microcoils. Standard-of-care evaluations were performed at baseline and the 1 month follow-up, which included hemorrhoid-related pain (HRP) (0-10), hemorrhoid symptoms score (HSS) (5-20), quality of life (QoL) (0-4), French bleeding score (FBS) (0-9), and HG (0-4). Clinical success was defined as improvement of symptoms without additional treatment. RESULTS: Embolization of at least 1 hemorrhoidal artery was achieved in 133 (99%) of the 134 patients. The mean number of SRA branches embolized per patient was 2.9 ± 1.0. Clinical success was seen in 93% (124 of 134) of patients at the 1-month follow-up, with 10 patients requiring repeat embolization. There were significant improvements in all mean outcomes at 1 month: HSS (11-7.8; P < .01), HRP (4.1-1.3; P < .01), QoL (2.2-0.8; P < .01), FBS (4.4-2.2; P < .01), and HG (2.3-1.2; P < .05). There were no severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: HAE is a safe and effective outpatient treatment for refractory symptomatic internal hemorrhoids in the short term.

Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction Score in patients with haemorrhoidal disease.

AIM: In this study we aimed to assess the responsiveness of the symptom score of the recently developed Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction Score (PROM-HISS). Furthermore, the minimally relevant difference (MRD) was determined. METHOD: The responsiveness of PROM-HISS was tested using a criterion-based (i.e. anchor) and construct-based (i.e. hypotheses testing) approach. Patients with haemorrhoidal disease (HD) completed the PROM-HISS before and 1 week after treatment in hospital. A global self-assessment of change question (SCQ) was administered 1-week after treatment and functioned as the criterion. The following analyses were performed: (1) correlation between the PROM-HISS symptom score and the criterion (SCQ) and (2) hypotheses testing. The MRD was determined as change in symptoms of the subgroup reporting 'somewhat fewer complaints' on the SCQ. RESULTS: Between February and August 2022, 94 patients with grade II-IV HD from three hospitals were included. The correlation between the SCQ and a change on the PROM-HISS symptom score was 0.595 indicating that an improvement on the SCQ corresponds to an improvement on the PROM-HISS symptom score. As hypothesized, the mean change in PROM-HISS scores was significantly different between subgroups of patients based on their SCQ responses. Patients reporting a small change in HD symptoms on the SCQ corresponded to a mean change of 0.3 on the PROM-HISS symptom score. CONCLUSION: The PROM-HISS symptom score is a responsive instrument as it identifies change in HD symptoms because of treatment. The estimated MRD of 0.3 can be used to inform clinical research and practice.

'Bumps down under:' hemorrhoids, skin tags and all things perianal.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There continues to be a concentrated effort to improve treatment options readily available for some of the most common perianal diseases: hemorrhoids, anal fissure and anal fistula. The emphasis remains on therapies that definitively address the underlying pathology yet minimize pain and risk of incontinence, have a short recovery period, and are cost-effective. In this analysis, recent developments in the literature are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Treatment of early stage hemorrhoidal disease remains the same. For grades II-IV disease, hemorrhoidal vessel ligation/obliteration with laser or bipolar energy are reported. For more advanced diseases, modifying the technique for hemorrhoidectomy to improve postoperative complications and pain is described. For anal fissure, a stepwise method continues to be the mainstay of treatment (initiating with vasodilators, followed by botox, and ultimately sphincterotomy), which decreases the risk of incontinence with proper patient selection and technique. Management of anal fistula continues to be challenging, balancing cure vs. risk of harm. Recent developments include modifications to ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and use of laser to obliterate the tract. SUMMARY: Advancements in managing benign anorectal disease are ongoing. Several reports are novel, whereas others involve enhancing well-established treatment options by either operative technique or patient selection.

Long-term Outcomes of Aluminum Potassium Sulfate and Tannic Acid Sclerotherapy for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids: A Single-Center, Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid sclerotherapy for hemorrhoids produced almost the same effects as excisional hemorrhoidectomy. However, its long-term effectiveness remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term results of sclerotherapy using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid for treating prolapsed hemorrhoids. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of a single-institution experience. SETTINGS: This study was conducted within a coloproctology unit at a community-based hospital. PATIENTS: In total, 1180 patients with grade II to IV hemorrhoids treated with injection sclerotherapy were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy measures included cumulative recurrence rates and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Recurrence rates at 3, 6, and 9 years were 7.4%, 27.2%, and 47.5%. Postoperative complications included fever ≥38°C in 16 (1.4%) patients, rectal ulcer in 10 (0.9%) patients, rectal stricture in 5 (0.4%) patients, and perianal abscess in 4 (0.3%) patients. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center study. In addition, office visits after 3 years were optional and the number of follow-ups steadily decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid offers reasonable long-term results and is associated with low complication rates. Therefore, it seems to be an attractive alternative for patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B733.RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE LA ESCLEROTERAPIA CON SULFATO DE ALUMINIO Y POTASIO, Y ÁCIDO TÁNICO PARA LAS HEMORROIDES PROLAPSADAS: ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL DE UN SOLO CENTRO. ANTECEDENTES: La escleroterapia con sulfato de aluminio y potasio, y ácido tánico para las hemorroides produjo casi los mismos efectos que la hemorroidectomía por escisión. Sin embargo, se desconoce su eficacia a largo plazo. OBJETIVO: El propósito de este estudio fue investigar los resultados a largo plazo de la escleroterapia con sulfato de aluminio y potasio, y ácido tánico para tratar las hemorroides prolapsadas. DISEO: Revisión retrospectiva de la experiencia de una sola institución. ENTORNO CLINICO: Este estudio se realizó dentro de una unidad de coloproctología en un hospital comunitario. PACIENTES: En total, 1.180 pacientes fueron inscritos con hemorroides grado II a IV tratados con inyecciones esclerosantes. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION: Las medidas de eficacia incluyeron tasas acumulativas de recurrencia y complicaciones posoperatorias. RESULTADOS: La tasa de recurrencia a los 3, 6 y 9 años fue del 7,4%, 27,2% y 47,5%, respectivamente. Las complicaciones posoperatorias incluyeron fiebre ≥ 38 grados Celsius en 16 pacientes (1,4%), úlcera rectal en 10 (0,9%), estenosis rectal en 5 (0,4%) y absceso perianal en 4 (0,3%) pacientes. LIMITACIONES: Este fue un estudio retrospectivo, no aleatorio, de un solo centro. Adicionalmente, las visitas al consultorio después de 3 años eran opcionales y el número de seguimientos disminuyó constantemente. CONCLUSIONES: La escleroterapia con sulfato de aluminio y potasio, y ácido tánico ofrece resultados razonables a largo plazo y está asociada con bajas tasas de complicaciones. Por tanto, parece ser una alternativa atractiva para pacientes con hemorroides prolapsadas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B733. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Rubber Band Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease Grades I/II/III: Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy are considered the office-based procedures of choice in hemorrhoidal disease. However, there are no studies comparing rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy compared with rubber band ligation. DESIGN: This study was a randomized open-label study with 1-year follow-up. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in the colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients with hemorrhoidal disease grades I to III were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified by hemorrhoidal disease grade and randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either rubber band ligation (n = 60) or polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy outcomes included therapeutic success and recurrence. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of complications related to the procedures. RESULTS: Therapeutic success was not significantly different between the groups (polidocanol foam sclerotherapy 93.3% vs rubber band ligation 85.0%, p = 0.14). However, complete success rate was higher in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group (88.3% vs 66.7%, p = 0.009) with fewer office-based sessions (mean ± SD: 1.32 ± 0.60 vs 1.62 ± 0.76, p = 0.02). Recurrence rates were lower in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group (16.1% vs 41.2%, p = 0.004). Most recurrences were mild (83.3%). Complications were more frequent in the rubber band ligation group (30.0% vs 10.0%, p = 0.01) and were mostly minor (91.7%). No severe complications were observed in either group. LIMITATIONS: This study was performed in a single center, and both patients and investigators were not blinded to the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures are effective in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease grades I to III. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy was more effective than rubber band ligation when considering complete success. Patients in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group needed fewer treatment sessions, had lower recurrence rates, and were less likely to have complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B816. REGISTRATION: https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04091763. ESCLEROTERAPIA CON ESPUMA DE POLIDOCANOL VERSUS LIGADURA CON BANDA DE GOMA EN LOS GRADOS I / II / III DE ENFERMEDAD HEMORROIDAL ENSAYO ALEATORIZADO: ANTECEDENTES:La ligadura con banda elástica y la escleroterapia se consideran los procedimientos de elección en el consultorio para la enfermedad hemorroidal. Sin embargo, no hay estudios que comparen la ligadura con bandas elastica y la escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de la escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol en comparación con la ligadura con bandas elastica.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatorizado randomizado, abierto, con seguimiento de 1 año.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en una unidad colorrectal de un hospital terciario.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 120 pacientes con enfermedad hemorroidal grados I a III.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron estratificados por grado de enfermedad hemorroidal y asignados al azar (1: 1) al tratamiento con ligadura con banda elastica (n = 60) o escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol (n = 60).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados de eficacia incluyeron el éxito terapéutico y la recurrencia. Los resultados de seguridad incluyeron la aparición de complicaciones relacionadas con los procedimientos.RESULTADOS:El éxito terapéutico no fue significativamente diferente entre los grupos (escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol 93,3% vs ligadura con banda de goma 85,0%, p = 0,14). Sin embargo, la tasa de éxito completo fue mayor en el grupo de escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol (88,3% vs 66,7%, p = 0,009), con menos sesiones en el consultorio (media ± desviación estándar: 1,32 ± 0,60 vs 1,62 ± 0,76, p = 0,02). Las tasas de recurrencia fueron más bajas en el grupo de escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol (16,1% vs 41,2%, p = 0,004). La mayoría de las recurrencias fueron leves (83,3%). Las complicaciones fueron más frecuentes en el grupo de ligadura con bandas elastica (30,0% vs 10,0%, p = 0,01) y fueron en su mayoría menores (91,7%). No se observaron complicaciones graves en ninguno de los grupos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio se realizó en un solo centro y ni los pacientes ni los investigadores estaban cegados al grupo de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:Ambos procedimientos son efectivos en el tratamiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal grados I a III. La escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol fue más eficaz que la ligadura con banda de goma cuando se consideró el éxito completo. Los pacientes del grupo de escleroterapia con espuma de polidocanol necesitaron menos sesiones de tratamiento, tuvieron tasas de recurrencia más bajas y menos probabilidades de tener complicaciones. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B816. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado)ClinicalTrials.gov, número NCT04091763.

Guidelines, guidelines and more guidelines for haemorrhoid treatment: A review to sort the wheat from the chaff.

AIM: Guidelines benefit patients and clinicians by distilling evidence into easy-to-read recommendations. The literature around the management of haemorrhoids is immense and guidelines are invaluable to improve treatment integrity and patient outcomes. We identified current haemorrhoid guidelines and assessed them for quality and consistency. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature from January 2011 to October 2021 was carried out. Guidelines identified were assessed for quality using the AGREE II instrument and for consistency in terms of tabulated treatment recommendations. RESULTS: During this period nine guidelines were identified worldwide. The general quality was poor with only one guideline considered of high enough quality for use. In general, expert selection criteria for guideline development groups were vaguely defined. There were inconsistencies in the interpretation of the published evidence leading to variation in treatment recommendations. DISCUSSION: Fewer, higher quality guidelines, with more consistent results, are needed. Particular attention should be given to defining the selection of experts involved.

Perianal thrombosis: no need for surgery.

AIM: There is little evidence for the best therapy for perianal thrombosis. No prospective trials exist. Even quality of retrospective data is low, due to low patient numbers or vague follow-up data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred nineteen patients with thrombosis of internal or external hemorrhoids who presented in our clinic between March 2017 and August 2018 were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated conservatively, with sitz baths and oral pain medication, if needed. No surgery was performed. Follow-up data was obtained by personal examination. Data was gathered prospectively, and data analysis was retrospective. RESULTS: Five hundred four patients had perianal thrombosis (81.4%), and 115 patients had thrombosed hemorrhoids. Mean pain on a numerical rating scale (0-10) was 3.8 for perianal thrombosis and 5.2 for thrombosed hemorrhoids. Five hundred forty-eight patients (88.5%) did not need a sick leave. On follow-up, patients stated that their pain had largely resolved after 5 days and completely disappeared after 10 days. Local recurrence rate after perianal thrombosis was 6.3%. CONCLUSION: Perianal thrombosis and thrombosed hemorrhoids heal well without surgery. There is no evidence for advantages surgical therapy could offer.

A multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using 3% polidocanol foam to treat second-degree haemorrhoids (SCLEROFOAM).

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3% polidocanol foam for treating 2nd-degree haemorrhoids. METHODS: A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial involving 10 tertiary referral centres for haemorrhodal disease (HD) was performed. Between January and June 2019, patients with 2nd-degree haemorrhoids were prospectively included in this study. The primary outcome was to establish the success rate after one sclerotherapy session in terms of complete resolution of bleeding episodes one week after the injection. The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey incontinence score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence. Pain after the procedure, subjective symptoms and the amount and type of painkillers used were recorded. Patients were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: There were 183 patients [111 males; 60.7%, mean age 51.3 ± 13.5 (18-75) years]. Complete resolution of bleeding was reached in 125/183 patients (68.3%) at 1 week and the recurrence rate was 12% (15/125). Thirteen patients (7.4%) underwent a second sclerotherapy session, while only 1 patient (1.8%) had to undergo a third session. The overall 1-year success rate was 95.6% (175/183). The HDSS and the SHS score significantly improved from a median preoperative value of 11 and 18 to 0 and 0, respectively (p < 0.001). There were 3 episodes of external thrombosis. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam is a safe, effective, painless, repeatable and low-cost procedure in patients with bleeding haemorrhoids.

Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease in patients with bleeding disorders: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) in patients with bleeding disorders (BD) is challenging. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS) is associated with a low rate of bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of PFS in the treatment of HD in patients with and without BD. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, cohort study enrolled patients with (group B) and without (group A) BD, with symptomatic internal HD grades I-III over an 18-month period. All patients were treated with PFS. Patients with congenital BD did not undergo prior replacement therapy and those with acquired BD due to antithrombotic drugs, did not discontinue therapy. Efficacy outcomes included therapeutic success and HD recurrence during a 1-year follow-up period. To evaluate safety the complications related to PFS were recorded. RESULTS: We included 228 patients (group A: 155, group B: 73; male/female: 114/114; mean age: 59.4 ± 15.9 years). The baseline hemorrhoidal disease bleeding grade (p < 0.001) and Sodergren hemorrhoidal symptom severity score (p = 0.019) were higher for group B. The overall therapeutic success rate was 93.4% with an average number of sessions of 1.51 ± 0.74, significantly higher for group B (1.68 ± 0.86 vs 1.43 ± 0.65, p = 0.013). Complications occurred in 11.4% of the patients, with bleeding reported in 4.8%. The majority of complications were mild (96.2%). No significant differences between the two groups were observed for therapeutic success, recurrence, or complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BD may have more symptomatic HD at baseline. Even so, PSF showed similar effectiveness and safety in patients with BD compared to patients without BD.

Sclerotherapy using 2 % polidocanol foam in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease - a single-center experience.

Elastic banding and sclerotherapy are the two most commonly performed instrumental therapies in the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Promising results have been shown with sclerotherapy using 2 % polidocanol foam. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polidocanol foam in the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoidal disease: What nurses need to know.

ABSTRACT: Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common anorectal disorder that affects at least 10 million people in the US, with a peak incidence in individuals between the ages of 45 and 65. This article discusses the signs, symptoms, risk factors, classification, treatment, and nursing interventions for patients with HD.

[Expert consensus on clinical application of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing].

Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing is one of the commonly used and effective drugs for external fumigation and washing of traditional Chinese medicine, it has the functions of dispelling wind, drying and dampness, alleviating edema, and reducing swelling, relieving pain and relieving itching. It is widely used for the treatment of external hemorrhoids, mixed hemorrhoids, internal hemorrhoids prolapse and incarceration, anal fissures, perianal abscess, anal fistula acute attack, perianal eczema and other diseases. It has a significant effect on the uncomfortable symptoms caused by various anal diseases, such as swelling, pain, wet itching, falling and swelling, and many secretions, as well as various postoperative complications. Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing has been used in clinic for many years, it has a lot of research evidence and experience in clinical application. In order to further improve the clinicians' knowledge of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing and guide clinical medication more reasonably, this consensus invites front-line clinical experts from anorectal department to compile, referring to the relevant clinical literature and guide, combining with the clinical treatment experience of experts, the function, usage, dosage, adverse reactions and points for attention were discussed of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing. This consensus was formed to provide reference for the clinical application of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing.

[Hemorrhoidal disease in 2022 : how to select the most appropriate treatment ?] / Maladie hémorroïdaire en 2022 : comment choisir le traitement adapté ?

Hemorrhoidal disease is frequent and can lead to major alteration of quality of life. Conservative treatment, instrumental therapies and surgical approach play a complementary role in the management of hemorrhoidal disease. Understanding all techniques is mandatory to guide the patient and offer the best individualized treatment. Guidelines issued by scientific societies can facilitate the therapeutic decision.

La maladie hémorroïdaire est fréquente et ses répercussions sur la qualité de vie peuvent être majeures. Traitement conservateur, procédés non chirurgicaux et interventions chirurgicales jouent un rôle complémentaire dans le traitement d'une maladie hémorroïdaire symptomatique. Pour guider le patient et lui offrir la prise en charge la plus adaptée à sa situation, une connaissance des différents traitements est indispensable. Les recommandations des sociétés savantes, basées sur des avis d'experts, peuvent faciliter la décision thérapeutique.

Superior Rectal Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Grades 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease: 6-Month Follow-up among 43 Patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the technical and clinical success rates of superior rectal artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic Grades 2 and 3 hemorrhoidal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since March 2019, 43 patients (24 men and 19 women; mean age, 52 years [18-77 years]) with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease have been treated and completed the 6-month follow-up with anamnestic questionnaire and disease scores, including French bleeding, Goligher prolapse, visual analog scale for pain, and quality of life. Clinical success was assessed at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up by updating the clinical scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0. RESULTS: In all, 25 patients had Grade 2 prolapse and 18 patients had Grade 3 prolapse, with 96% and 77%, respectively, having bleeding as a symptom. All patients were discharged within 24 hours. The reduction in the French bleeding score (global and single entity) in Grade 3 prolapse was statistically significant (P = .001). Improvement in the quality of life was significant in both groups (P < .05). No serious complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhoidal embolization was a safe and effective technique in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease with minimal hospitalization, pain, and disruption of daily activities. It can be offered to patients unwilling to undergo a surgical procedure but can also be indicated in the emergency setting for patients on anticoagulant therapy or those unfit for surgery.

Superior Rectal Artery Embolization with Tris-Acryl Gelatin Microspheres: A Randomized Comparison of Particle Size.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superior rectal artery embolization (SRAE) with different-sized tris-acryl gelatin microspheres in symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease (HD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (male, 30; female, 12; median age, 45 years) with symptomatic HD (2 grade I, 8 grade II, 17 grade III, and 15 grade IV) were divided into 3 experimental arms (500-700 µm, 700-900 µm, and 900-1,200 µm groups; each had 14 patients) in a prospective randomized style to perform SRAE. Follow-up was performed by rectoscopy, clinical examination, and questionnaires. The primary outcome measure was the clinical success rate at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were technical success rate, recurrence rate, procedure-related mortality, procedure-related complications, and any outcome changes between particle sizes. RESULTS: No procedure-related deaths or major morbidities were observed. There was a 54% minor complication rate (n = 23/42) in the treated zone: 45% sustained small superficial ulcerations (n = 19/42), 7% small rectosigmoid junction ulcerations (n = 3/42), and 2% small fibrotic scar tissue (n = 1/42). The clinical success rate was 93%. Of the groups, the best French bleeding score decrease was obtained in the 900-1,200 µm group. There were improvements in the quality of life score and visual analogue scale score after the SRAE procedure, although not in the Goligher score. No recurrent disease was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SRAE with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for symptomatic HD is a safe and efficient treatment, with results favoring the use of larger microspheres.