Daratumumab plus bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in Asian patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: subgroup analysis of ANDROMEDA.

Subcutaneous daratumumab plus bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd; D-VCd) improved outcomes versus VCd for patients with newly diagnosed immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study. We report a subgroup analysis of Asian patients (Japan; Korea; China) from ANDROMEDA. Among 388 randomized patients, 60 were Asian (D-VCd, n = 29; VCd, n = 31). At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the overall hematologic complete response rate was higher for D-VCd versus VCd (58.6% vs. 9.7%; odds ratio, 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-53.7; P < 0.0001). Six-month cardiac and renal response rates were higher with D-VCd versus VCd (cardiac, 46.7% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.0036; renal, 57.1% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.4684). Major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) and major organ deterioration event-free survival (MOD-EFS) were improved with D-VCd versus VCd (MOD-PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.75; P = 0.0079; MOD-EFS: HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54; P = 0.0007). Twelve deaths occurred (D-VCd, n = 3; VCd, n = 9). Twenty-two patients had baseline serologies indicating prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposure; no patient experienced HBV reactivation. Although grade 3/4 cytopenia rates were higher than in the global safety population, the safety profile of D-VCd in Asian patients was generally consistent with the global study population, regardless of body weight. These results support D-VCd use in Asian patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201965.

Individualized Approach to Management of Light Chain Amyloidosis.

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by a B-cell (most commonly plasma cell) clone that produces a toxic light chain that forms amyloid fibrils in tissues and causes severe, progressive organ dysfunction. The clinical presentation is protean, and patients are usually extremely frail, thus requiring careful adaptation of the treatment approach. However, the severity of organ involvement can be accurately assessed with biomarkers that allow a sharp prognostic stratification and precise tailoring of the treatment strategy. Moreover, the availability of biomarker-based response criteria also allows adjustment of the treatment approach over time. The recent completion of 3 large randomized clinical trials has offered new evidence for designing appropriate treatments. All this information has recently been integrated in the joint guidelines of the International Society of Amyloidosis and the European Hematology Association for the treatment of AL amyloidosis. Other clinical trials are underway testing new agents directed against the amyloid clone and the amyloid deposits. Our understanding of the peculiarities of the amyloid clone, as well as our ability to detect residual clonal disease and improve organ dysfunction, are also being refined and will result in more precise personalization of the treatment approach.

Quality of life and symptoms among patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib-dexamethasone versus physician's choice.

Patient-reported outcomes in AL amyloidosis have not been well-studied. We analyzed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and AL amyloidosis symptoms data from the phase 3 TOURMALINE-AL1 trial (NCT01659658) (ixazomib-dexamethasone, n = 85; physician's choice of chemotherapy [PC], n = 83). HRQOL and symptom burden were measured with the SF-36v2, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and an amyloidosis symptom questionnaire (ASQ). Score changes during treatment were analyzed descriptively and using repeated-measures linear mixed models; analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity. Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline were significantly higher (better HRQOL) for ixazomib-dexamethasone at several cycles for SF-36v2 Role Physical and Vitality subscales (p < .05); no subscales demonstrated significant differences favoring PC. For FACT/GOG-Ntx, small but significant differences in LS mean changes favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at multiple cycles for seven items and both summary scores; significant differences favored PC for one item (trouble hearing) at multiple cycles. ASQ total score trended downward (lower burden) in both arms; significant LS mean differences favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at some cycles (p < .05). Patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib-dexamethasone experienced HRQOL and symptoms that were similar to or trended better than patients treated with PC despite longer duration of therapy.

A prospective phase 2 trial of daratumumab in patients with previously treated systemic light-chain amyloidosis.

Daratumumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, an antigen uniformly expressed by plasma cells in multiple myeloma and light-chain amyloidosis (AL). We report the results of a prospective multicenter phase 2 study of daratumumab monotherapy in AL (NCT02816476). Forty previously treated AL patients with a difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) >50 mg/L were included in 15 centers between September of 2016 and April of 2018. Patients received 6 28-day cycles of IV daratumumab, every week for cycles 1 and 2 and every 2 weeks for cycles 3 through 6. Median age was 69 years (range, 45-83). Twenty-six patients had ≥2 organs involved, with heart in 24 and kidney in 26. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 23 months (interquartile range, 4-122), with a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-5). At data cutoff (September of 2019), all patients discontinued therapy; 33 received the planned 6 cycles. Overall, 22 patients had hematological response, and 19 patients (47.5%) achieved very good partial response (dFLC <40 mg/L) or better. Median time to hematological response was 1 week. Patients with no response after 4 doses were unlikely to respond further. Renal and cardiac responses occurred in 8 and 7 patients, respectively. Daratumumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 2-year overall survival rate was 74% (95% confidence interval, 62-81). Daratumumab monotherapy is associated with deep and rapid hematological responses in previously treated AL patients, with a good safety profile. Further studies of daratumumab in combination regimens are warranted.

Health-related quality of life in patients with light chain amyloidosis treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone ± daratumumab: Results from the ANDROMEDA study.

In the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial, patients treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) had significantly higher rates of organ and hematologic response compared with patients who received VCd alone. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the ANDROMEDA trial. PROs were assessed through cycle 6 using three standardized questionnaires. Treatment effect through cycle 6 was measured by a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model. The magnitude of changes in PROs versus baseline was generally low, but between-group differences favored the D-VCd group. Results were generally consistent irrespective of hematologic, cardiac, or renal responses. More patients in the D-VCd group experienced meaningful improvements in PROs; median time to improvement was more rapid in the D-VCd group versus the VCd group. After cycle 6, patients in the D-VCd group received daratumumab monotherapy and their PRO assessments continued, with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) reported through cycle 19. PROs of subgroups with renal and cardiac involvement were consistent with those of the intent-to-treat population. These results demonstrate that the previously reported clinical benefits of D-VCd were achieved without decrement to patients' HRQoL and provide support of D-VCd in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Immunotherapy in AL Amyloidosis.

OPINION STATEMENT: Light-chain amyloidosis is a rare disorder where a small clone of plasma cells is producing excess toxic light chains that deposit in various organs and cause dysfunction. Cardiac involvement is a major determinant of survival and rapid reduction of light chain is critical for recovery of organ function and overall survival. Immunotherapy targeting the clonal plasma cells and amyloid fibrils has emerged as a promising candidate. Daratumumab, both alone and in combinations with other anti-myeloma agents, is able to achieve deep hematologic responses and has greatly improved outcomes. Isatuximab, elotuzumab, and CAEL101 have also shown promising results and further studies are ongoing in the frontline as well as the relapsed/refractory setting. The frailty of AL patients and the relapsing/remitting nature of the disease present unique challenges, and the low toxicity of monoclonal antibodies makes them well-suited for these patients. Other immunotherapy agents including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates have altered the landscape in treatment of multiple myeloma, and are in the early phase of evaluation in patients with AL amyloidosis with results eagerly awaited.

Daratumumab for relapsed AL amyloidosis-When cumulative real-world data precedes clinical trials: A multisite study and systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (RRAL) have poor prognosis, but emerging data shows promising results with the use daratumumab. We evaluated daratumumab treatment in RRAL in real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective multisite study of RRAL patients treated with daratumumab alone and in combinations. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients, diagnosed between 1.1.2008 and 1.2.2018 were included; 27% also had multiple myeloma (MM). Revised Mayo score was ≥ 3 in 67%. Hematologic overall response rate was 81%, 64% achieved very good partial response (VGPR) or better. Concurrent active MM was associated with lower rates of VGPR (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.81; P = .03) in a multi-variate analysis. Cardiac and renal responses were 74% and 73%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 2-year PFS and OS were 68.6 ± 7.5% and 90.4 ± 4.6%, respectively. Hematologic response correlated with prolonged PFS and OS. Daratumumab was safe and well tolerated, no patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our data was aligned with outcomes from a systematic literature review, which identified 10 case series (n = 517) and 2 clinical trials (n = 62) meeting prespecified criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support favorable safety tolerability and efficacy of daratumumab among non-selective RRAL patients in a real-world setting.

An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is characterized by the nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin secreted by an otherwise asymptomatic or indolent B cell or plasma cell clone, without hematologic criteria for treatment. These MGRS-associated diseases can involve one or more renal compartments, including glomeruli, tubules, and vessels. Hydrophobic residue replacement, N-glycosylated, increase in isoelectric point in monoclonal immunoglobulin (MIg) causes it to transform from soluble form to tissue deposition, and consequently resulting in glomerular damage. In addition to MIg deposition, complement deposition is also found in C3 glomerulopathy with monoclonal glomerulopathy, which is caused by an abnormality of the alternative pathway and may involve multiple factors including complement component 3 nephritic factor, anti-complement factor auto-antibodies, or MIg which directly cleaves C3. Furthermore, inflammatory factors, growth factors, and virus infection may also participate in the development of the diseases. In this review, for the first time, we discussed current highlights in the mechanism of MGRS-related lesions.

Patient outcomes in light chain (AL) amyloidosis: The clock is ticking from symptoms to diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomology of AL amyloidosis can be vague, with a broad range of manifestations and potential etiologies. We sought to determine whether time from initial patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis was associated with survival. METHODS: The Boston University Amyloidosis Patient Database was queried for patients with AL amyloidosis who presented to the Center for initial evaluation from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients with AL amyloidosis were evaluated for initial evaluation. The median time to diagnosis from initial symptom onset was 7.1 months (range, 0-61). At data cutoff, 60.2% (n = 195) of patients were alive; of those, the majority were diagnosed <6 months from initial symptoms (52.3%, n = 102). In contrast, time to diagnosis from symptom onset was >6 months in 63.6% (n = 82) of patients who did not survive at the time of data cutoff (P = .0005). Survival analysis of time from diagnosis to death or data cutoff stratified by time from patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis (<6, 6-12, and >12 months) showed significant differences among groups (P = .001). Additionally, multivariable regression demonstrated that an increase in time from self-reported symptom onset to diagnosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04, P = .002). CONCLUSION: These results support the importance of early diagnosis for patients with AL amyloidosis.

The value of screening biopsies in light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic amyloidosis is a histological diagnosis, often achieved via critical organ biopsy. Screening biopsies represent a low-risk approach to diagnosis. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: All patients with systemic AL and ATTR amyloidosis who underwent abdominal fat aspiration (AFA) and either a bone marrow (BM) or gastrointestinal (GI) biopsy at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2006-2019) were identified. We sought to determine diagnostic sensitivity in relation to whole body amyloid burden, amyloid type and organ involvement. RESULTS: Diagnostic sensitivity established in 471 patients with AL (n = 321) and ATTR (n = 150) amyloidosis, respectively, was 73.2% and 27.3% for AFA (P< .001), 59.7% and 42.2% for BM (P< .001), and 74.6% and 44.6% for GI biopsy (P< .001). ATTR amyloid deposits were detected in 35.4% BMs and 33.3% of GI biopsies when AFA did not demonstrate amyloid. In AL amyloidosis, sensitivity of combined AFA and BM biopsy in AL amyloidosis was 82.9%. There was a strong association between whole body amyloid burden and sensitivity of each screening biopsy method. The diagnostic sensitivity of screening biopsies ranged from 80.0% to 90.5% for patients with a large amyloid load on 123 I-SAP scintigraphy in comparison with 53.9%-79.0% in those with no visceral amyloid visible on imaging. CONCLUSION: Performing both AFA and BM biopsy should be considered in suspected AL amyloidosis to substantially reduce the clinical risk associated with critical organ biopsy. The sensitivity of screening biopsies in ATTR amyloidosis is poor.

Supportive Care in AL Amyloidosis.

Immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a systemic disease characterized by the production and deposition of light chain-derived amyloid fibrils in different organs. Prompt treatment directed to the underlying plasma cell clone is crucial in order to achieve a rapid, deep and durable hematologic response. The decrease in the production of the amyloidogenic light chains is a required condition to obtain the organ response, which is commonly delayed. Meanwhile, supportive treatment is aimed to maintain quality of life of these patients and preserve their involved organs' function. From simple measures, such as salt restriction or compressive stockings, to very complex interventions, such as heart transplantation in very selected patients with isolated severe cardiac involvement, this supportive care is essential and has to be necessarily included in the multidisciplinary management of this disease.

Prognosis and Staging of AL Amyloidosis.

The treatment options for systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) are currently widening in an unprecedented way, brought about by an expanding arsenal of anti-myeloma therapy as well as by novel approaches to target toxic light chains and, most recently, deposited amyloid directly. In this context, accurate estimates of prognosis in AL, which allow for reliable patient advice and for example comparison of different therapies, are particularly important to clinicians. Some biomarkers and especially the genetic background of the underlying clonal disease as evaluated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization even have predictive value, enabling an appropriate treatment selection. Derived from the most frequently involved organs in AL, heart and kidney, this review focuses on overall survival and renal survival. A comprehensive overview and summary of reported prognostic factors and biomarkers in AL is given and the most important and validated factors are highlighted. Finally, established staging systems in AL as well as validated and perspective response criteria are presented.

Nonchemotherapy Treatment of Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is a rare, life-threatening disease characterized by the deposition of misfolded proteins in vital organs such as the heart, the lungs, the kidneys, the peripheral nervous system, and the gastrointestinal tract. This causes a direct toxic effect, eventually leading to organ failure. The underlying B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder is almost always a clonal plasma cell disorder, most often a small plasma cell clone of <10%. Current therapy is directed toward elimination of the plasma cell clone with the goal of preventing further organ damage and reversal of the existing organ damage. Autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to be a very effective treatment in patients with AL amyloidosis, although it cannot be widely applied as patients are often frail at presentation, making them ineligible for transplantation. Treatment with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone has emerged as the standard of care for the treatment of AL amyloidosis. Novel anti-plasma cell therapies, such as second generation proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies targeting a surface protein on the plasma cell (daratumumab, elotuzumab), and the small molecular inhibitor venetoclax, have continued to emerge and are being evaluated in combination with the standard of care. However, there is still a need for therapies that directly target the amyloid fibrils and reverse organ damage. In this review, we will discuss current and emerging nonchemotherapy treatments of AL amyloidosis, including antifibril directed therapies under current investigation.

Conventional Therapy for Amyloid Light-Chain Amyloidosis.

The vast majority of patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis are not eligible for stem cell transplant and are treated with conventional chemotherapy. Conventional regimens are based on various combinations of dexamethasone, alkylating agents, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs. The choice of these regimens requires a careful risk stratification, based on the extent of amyloid organ involvement, comorbidities, and the characteristics of the amyloidogenic plasma cell clone. Most patients are treated upfront with bortezomib and dexamethasone combined with cyclophosphamide or melphalan. Cyclophosphamide does not compromise stem cell mobilization and harvest and is more manageable in renal failure. Melphalan can overcome the effect of t(11;14), which is associated with lower response rates and shorter survival in subjects treated with bortezomib and dexamethasone, or in combination with cyclophosphamide. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide are the mainstay of rescue treatment. They are effective in patients exposed to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and alkylators, but deep hematologic responses are rare. Ixazomib, alone or in combination with lenalidomide, increases the rate of complete responses in relapsed/refractory patients. Conventional chemotherapy regimens will represent the backbone for future combinations, particularly with anti-plasma-cell immunotherapy, that will further improve response rates and outcomes.

When to Suspect a Diagnosis of Amyloidosis.

Amyloidosis is a group of complex diseases caused by extracellular deposition of pathological insoluble fibrillary protein in organs and tissues and may result in severe organ dysfunction. Despite the etiological heterogeneity of systemic amyloidosis, the clinical manifestations of the different forms of amyloidosis largely overlap and depend upon the effected organ. The signs and symptoms that should raise suspicion for the potential diagnosis of amyloidosis are usually nonspecific; therefore, establishing the diagnosis is difficult, and early diagnosis requires clinical suspicion. Light chain (AL) amyloidosis may present with highly specific signs such as macroglossia and periorbital purpura, but these signs are insensitive. Amyloidosis is still underdiagnosed, even though treatments are now available and are effective in improving patient's survival and quality of life. Cardiac amyloidosis is the major determinant of survival, and the earlier it is detected the better the survival. All MGUS patients should be routinely screened for AL amyloidosis by a focused history and physical examination and routine assessment of urine albumin. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with knowledge about the signs and symptoms that raise the suspicion of amyloidosis, bearing in mind the importance of early diagnosis of this disease.

High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis.

AL amyloidosis is a systemic amyloidosis and is associated with an underlying plasma cell dyscrasia. High-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation was developed for the treatment of AL amyloidosis in the early 1990s and was prompted by its success in myeloma. This application has evolved significantly over the past three decades. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of eligibility criteria, stem cell collection, and mobilization strategies and regimens, risk-adapted melphalan dosing, role for induction and consolidation therapies as well as long-term outcome with respect to survival, hematologic response and relapse as well as organ responses following stem cell transplantation. Continued efforts to refine patient selection and management, and incorporate novel anti-plasma cell agents in combination or sequentially to further improve outcomes in AL amyloidosis are also discussed.

Solid Organ Transplantation in Amyloidosis.

Amyloidosis comprises a diverse group of diseases characterized by misfolding of precursor proteins which eventually form amyloid aggregates and preceding intermediaries, which are deposited in target tissues causing progressive organ damage. In all forms of amyloidosis, vital organs may fail; depending on the specific amyloidosis type, this may occur rapidly or progress slowly. Beyond therapies to reduce the precursor protein (chemotherapy for light chain [AL] amyloidosis, anti-inflammatory therapy in serum A amyloid-osis [AA], and antisense RNA therapy in transthyretin amyloidosis [ATTR]), organ transplantation may also be a means to reduce amyloidogenic protein, e.g., in types of amyloid-osis in which the variant precursor is produced by the liver. Heart transplantation is a life-saving approach to the treatment of patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis; however, amyloidosis may still be considered a contraindication to the procedure despite data supporting improved outcomes, similar to patients with other indications. Kidney transplantation is associated with particularly favorable outcomes in patients with amyloidosis, especially if the precursor protein has been eliminated. Overall, outcomes of solid organ transplantation are improving, but more data are needed to refine the selection criteria and the timing for organ transplantation, which should be performed in highly experienced centers involving multidisciplinary teams with close patient follow-up to detect amyloid recurrence.

Classic features of primary systemic amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) leading to diagnosis of plasma cell myeloma.

The diagnosis of primary systemic amyloidosis, also known as AL (amyloid light-chain) amyloidosis, is often delayed owing to its nonspecific manifestations as well as its rarity. A 64-year-old woman presented with an eight-month history of significant weight loss, anemia, fatigue, and progressive painful cutaneous lesions on her hands, lips, back, perianal, and vulvar area that were originally treated unsuccessfully with antimalarials and systemic corticosteroids. Histopathological examination revealed an amorphous dermis with pale pink material that demonstrated positive birefringence with Congo red staining. Subsequently, the patient underwent a bone marrow biopsy, which uncovered a plasma cell myeloma, the source of her amyloidogenic protein production.

Bendamustine plus rituximab for indolent B-cell lymphoma of renal significance.

Treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) of renal significance is challenging given the need for deep and prolonged hematological response to restore and control renal function overtime, yet to be balanced with the risk of adverse drug-related events. This prospective single-center study included 20 patients with iNHL of renal significance (tubulointerstitial presentation [n = 8], glomerulopathy with or without monoclonal Ig deposits [n = 12]) who received a steroid-sparing regimen of rituximab plus bendamustine (BR), with either no or <1 month of steroid intake (as a first line therapy in 80%). Seventeen patients (85%) achieved a complete (CHR, n = 12) or a partial (PHR, n = 5) hematological response. Nine out of the 12 patients (75%) with iNHL-related glomerulopathy had a complete (CRR) or a partial (PRR) renal response. Among the six patients with glomerulopathy and CHR, five had a CRR (83%) compared to 1/6 (17%) that did not reach CHR. eGFR increased from 38 to 58 mL/min/1.73 m2 , and returned to baseline in five patients. Among the eight patients with a tubulointerstitial presentation, six (75%) had a renal response (5 CRR), and eGFR increased from 29 to 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 . One patient with a PHR had a renal relapse. Mortality rate was 10% at 12 months. The BR regimen was well tolerated overall. Thus, despite severe renal disease at presentation, a relapsing iNHL in 20% of patients and several comorbidities, the BR regimen was efficient and safe in our series. It should be further assessed as a first line therapy for patients with iNHL of renal significance.