The safety and efficacy of TNF inhibitors in patients with Behçet's disease: Retrospective study from eastern Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical features, disease course, and associated factors for outcome in severe/refractory BD patients receiving TNF-i treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records from a tertiary referral center in Van province in Eastern Turkey. Data were obtained from patients' charts followed up between June 2019 and June 2022. RESULTS: We included 469 BD patients (59.3% male) whose 80 patients (17%) received TNF-i treatment in the study. The mean ± standard deviation of the patient age was 36.7 ± 10.1 years and the median (IQR) disease duration was 12 (12) years. IFX and ADAwere initiated in 67.5% (n = 54) and 32.5% (n = 26) patients, respectively. Overall and first-line retention rates of TNF-i were 84.7% and 92.6% for IFX and 83.3% and 80.8% for ADA, respectively. IFX was discontinued in 9 patients which were in 2 patients due to allergic reaction and tuberculosis, 3 patients for inefficacy, one patient for heart failure, and one patient for orbital zona. Although no serious adverse event was observed with ADA, 5 patients switched to IFX due to inefficacy. Overall, 72 patients (90%) resumed TNF-i at the end of the study; TNF-i was discontinued in 3 patients (3.8%) due to severe adverse events and in 5 patients (6.2%) with prolonged remission. CONCLUSION: In our study, no case of death was observed in TNF-i receiving patients. Most patients achieved attack-free and CS-free disease and retained TNF-i treatment. TNF inhibitors appear to be safe and effective in patients with severe/refractory Behçet's disease.

Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-TNF in Combination With Low-Dose Methotrexate vs Anti-TNF Monotherapy in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, including infliximab and adalimumab, are a mainstay of pediatric Crohn's disease therapy; however, nonresponse and loss of response are common. As combination therapy with methotrexate may improve response, we performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pragmatic trial to compare tumor necrosis factor inhibitors with oral methotrexate to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor monotherapy. METHODS: Patients with pediatric Crohn's disease initiating infliximab or adalimumab were randomized in 1:1 allocation to methotrexate or placebo and followed for 12-36 months. The primary outcome was a composite indicator of treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included anti-drug antibodies and patient-reported outcomes of pain interference and fatigue. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were collected. RESULTS: Of 297 participants (mean age, 13.9 years, 35% were female), 156 were assigned to methotrexate (110 infliximab initiators and 46 adalimumab initiators) and 141 to placebo (102 infliximab initiators and 39 adalimumab initiators). In the overall population, time to treatment failure did not differ by study arm (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.05). Among infliximab initiators, there were no differences between combination and monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.55-1.56). Among adalimumab initiators, combination therapy was associated with longer time to treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81). A trend toward lower anti-drug antibody development in the combination therapy arm was not significant (infliximab: odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49-1.07; adalimumab: odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.24-2.07). No differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed. Combination therapy resulted in more AEs but fewer SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Among adalimumab but not infliximab initiators, patients with pediatric Crohn's disease treated with methotrexate combination therapy experienced a 2-fold reduction in treatment failure with a tolerable safety profile. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT02772965.

Efficacy and safety of Infliximab in systemic sarcoidosis according to GenPhenReSa organ-involvement phenotype: a retrospective study of 55 patients.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is currently recommended as a third-line treatment for refractory sarcoidosis. Data in function of clinical phenotype are currently lacking. We evaluated patients' characteristics and responses to infliximab according to their GenPhenReSa cluster. METHODS: We evaluated clinical and biological characteristics of patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis who received infliximab between September 2008 and April 2019 at our centre. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (median disease duration, 87 months) received infliximab: 48 (87%) as a second- or third-line treatment, and 7 (13%) as a first-line treatment. After a median duration of 12 months, 24 (45%) and 14 (25%) patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, together with a significant decrease in the number of affected organs and tapering of steroid doses. All patients with neurosarcoidosis (OR 17), 90% in group 2 (ocular-cardiac-cutaneous-CNS, OR 7.4), and approximately two-thirds of those in groups 1 (abdominal organs), 4 (pulmonary-lympho-nodal), and 5 (extrapulmonary), achieved a response, whereas patients in group 3 (musculoskeletal-cutaneous) had a treatment-failure OR of 9. Infliximab could be stopped after complete remission was achieved in 7 patients: 4 relapsed after a median of 6 months. Overall, 36% of patients experienced serious adverse events, mainly infections, which led to treatment cessation in 29% of patients and caused two deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Other than patients with musculoskeletal-cutaneous involvement (group 3), infliximab led to a good response for patients with CNS (group 2) and liver (group 1) organ-predominant sarcoidosis. However, it led to serious infections and merely suspended sarcoidosis, so further research on factors predictive of relapse is needed.

Anti-TNF-α induced paradoxical psoriasis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The approval of TNF-a inhibitors (TNFi) was a breakthrough in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although also effective in psoriasis, drug-related adverse events of onset of psoriasiform skin lesions - paradoxical psoriasis (PP) under TNFi have been reported. METHODS: We performed an electronic data search in MEDLINE via Pubmed and Cochrane library scientific databases from inception to January 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed the distinct characteristics and frequency of risks for PP appearance in AS patients treated with different TNFi. RESULTS: PP was found in 0.5-1% of TNFi-treated AS patients and the latency period was 2-11 months. The safest TNFi in terms of PP induction was certolizumab, whereas the one most commonly associated with PP was infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: PP is an uncommon adverse reaction to TNFi treatment in AS patients and responds well to drug withdrawal. More large data studies need to be conducted though, to shed light on PP nature and management.

Infliximab desensitization in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a safe therapeutic alternative.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the administration of infliximab (IFX) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) patients are not rare and usually lead to drug discontinuation. We report data on safety and effectiveness of desensitization to IFX in patients with previous HSR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study. Patients for whom a desensitization protocol to IFX was realized after a previous HSR were included. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and IFX trough levels at both inclusion and six months after desensitization were collected. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence of HSR were evaluated. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2020, 27 patients (Crohn's Disease: 26 (96%) were included). Desensitization after HSR was performed after a median time of 10.4 months (2.9-33.1). Nineteen (70%) patients received immunosuppressants at time of desensitization. Eight (30%) patients presented HSR at first (n = 2), second (n = 4) or third (n = 2) IFX perfusion after desensitization. None led to intensive care unit transfer or death. Thirteen (48%) had clinical response at 6 months and 8 (29%) were still under IFX treatment two years after desensitization. IFX trough levels and ADA were available for 14 patients at time of desensitization. Most patients (12 out of 14) had ADA at a high level. At 6 months, among the 7 patients with long term response to IFX, 4 presented a decrease of ADA titers and 2 had a significant trough level of IFX. CONCLUSION: IFX desensitization in patients with IBD is a safe therapeutic alternative and represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics.What is already known? Hypersensitivity reactions to the administration of infliximab is frequent. Occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction, either immediate or delayed, usually leads to permanent drug discontinuation.What is new here? Infliximab desensitization is well tolerated with no hypersensitivity reaction recurrence in 70% of patients. Clinical success at 6 months was of 48% and around a third of patients remained under infliximab therapy two years after desensitization. Antidrug antibodies decreased and infliximab trough levels increased in these patients showing the impact of desensitization on immunogenicity.How can this study help patient care? Infliximab desensitization represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics who presented hypersensitivity reaction to the drug.

Comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis included in randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While indirect comparison of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) shows that IFX has better effectiveness during induction, and comparable efficacy during maintenance treatment, comparative data specific to subcutaneous (SC) IFX (i.e., CT-P13 SC) versus VDZ are limited. AIM: Pooled analysis of randomised studies to compare efficacy and safety with IFX SC and VDZ in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Parallel-group, randomised studies evaluating IFX SC and VDZ in patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC were identified. Eligible studies reported ≥ 1 prespecified outcome of interest at Week 6 (reflecting treatment during the induction phase) and/or at 1 year (Weeks 50-54; reflecting treatment during the maintenance phase). Prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes considered in this pooled analysis included the proportions of patients achieving disease-specific clinical responses, clinical remission, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, or discontinuing due to AEs. Data from multiple studies or study arms were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model; comparative analyses were performed separately for patients with CD and UC. RESULTS: We identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ. In patients with CD, intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy (overlapping 95% CIs) than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In patients with UC, efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year. CONCLUSION: IFX SC demonstrated better efficacy than VDZ in patients with CD, and similar efficacy to VDZ in patients with UC; 1-year safety was comparable with IFX SC and VDZ.

Co-occurrence of oral pemphigus vulgaris and herpes simplex virus infection in a young patient with Crohn's disease: report of a rare case of oral lesions during anti-TFN alpha and immunomodulator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune disease that affects desmoglein-1 and desmoglein-3, leading to intraepithelial vesiculobullous lesions. In the oral mucosa, PV lesions can mimic other diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid, other forms of pemphigus, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and virus-induced ulcers like herpes simplex virus (HSV), making diagnosis challenging. The co-occurrence of PV with Crohn's disease is rare and predominantly seen in younger patients. The therapeutic mainstay for both PV and Crohn's disease usually involves systemic corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants and immunobiological drugs. Literature indicates that the use of these drugs, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors, for managing autoimmune diseases like Crohn's can potentially induce other autoimmune diseases known as autoimmune-like syndromes, which include episodes of lupus-like syndrome and inflammatory neuropathies. There are few cases in the literature reporting the development of PV in individuals with CD undergoing infliximab therapy. CASE REPORT: A young female with severe Crohn's disease, treated with the TNF-alpha inhibitor infliximab, developed friable pseudomembranous oral ulcerations. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses confirmed these as PV. The treatment included clobetasol propionate and low-level photobiomodulation, which resulted in partial improvement. The patient later experienced severe intestinal bleeding, requiring intravenous hydrocortisone therapy, which improved both her systemic condition and oral lesions. Weeks later, new ulcerations caused by herpes virus and candidiasis were identified, leading to treatment with oral acyclovir, a 21-day regimen of oral nystatin rinse, and photodynamic therapy, ultimately healing the oral infections. To manage her condition, the gastroenterologists included methotrexate (25 mg) in her regimen to reduce the immunogenicity of infliximab and minimize corticosteroid use, as the patient was in remission for Crohn's disease, and the oral PV lesions were under control. CONCLUSION: Young patients with Crohn's disease should be referred to an oral medicine specialist for comorbidity investigation, as oral PV and opportunistic infections can arise during immunosuppressive therapy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's, should be carefully evaluated for potential side effects, including oral PV.

Identifying risk factors of anti-TNF induced skin lesions and other adverse events in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: While higher infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations (TCs) are associated with better outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), they could pose a risk for adverse events (AEs), including IFX-induced skin lesions. Therefore, we studied correlations between IFX TCs and occurrence of AEs in paediatric IBD patients. METHODS: In this single-centre study, all children with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving IFX maintenance therapy who underwent proactive drug monitoring between March 2015 and August 2022 were included. IFX doses/intervals/TCs and patient characteristics were systematically registered, as well as AEs and skin lesions appearance. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (72 CD and 37 UC) contributed 2913 IFX TCs. During a median follow-up of 3.0 [1.5-4.5] years, we observed 684 AEs in 101 patients and 49 skin lesions in 35 patients. There was no significant difference (p = .467) in median TCs between patients with and without skin lesions. However, higher median IFX doses were associated with an increased hazard rate of skin lesions [HR 1.084 (1.024-1.148), p = .005], in addition to female sex [2.210 (1.187-5.310), p = .016] and diagnosis of CD [1.695 (1.241-1.877), p = .011]. Considering IFX therapeutic TC cut-offs of 5.0 and 9.0 µg/mL, there was no significant difference in AE rate (p = .749 and p = .833, respectively). Also, no significant association between IFX doses and AE rate (p = .159). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the IFX dose to achieve therapeutic TCs may not increase the overall risk of AEs in paediatric IBD patients. However, concerns arise regarding the risk of skin lesions, especially in female CD patients.

Implementation of risk minimization measures to reduce the risk of tuberculosis among tumor necrosis factor medication users.

PURPOSE: To examine the adherence to risk minimization measures (RMMs) in newly treated patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) medications at one of the largest tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We included patients who had at least one prescription of infliximab or adalimumab. The index date was the first recorded date of infliximab or adalimumab prescription. New users of anti-TNF-α were divided into pre- and post-RMM implementation groups. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients that received tuberculosis (TB) screening, including a chest X-ray (CXR) or a QuantiFERON test within 1 month prior to the index date. RESULTS: A pre-post RMM implementation comparison of TB screening among infliximab users showed a significant increase in the rates of CXR tests (from 7.5% before RMM implementation to 13.8% after RMM implementation, p < 0.001) and the rates of QuantiFERON tests (4.5% before RMM implementation to 24.1% after RMM implementation, p < 0.001). RMMs were introduced to the study site at the same time as adalimumab was approved and the proportion of patients receiving TB screening was 25.2%. CONCLUSION: TB screening prior to initiation of infliximab or adalimumab was not optimal. However, we noted an improvement in TB screening after the implementation of RMMs for infliximab. Future research may address reasons for low adherence to testing requirements for TB prior to initiation of anti-TNF-α medications.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody specifically binding tumor necrosis factor-alpha and has been approved for the treatment of several inflammatory disorders. However, the efficacy of infliximab in primary treatment of Kawasaki disease (KD) or retreatment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)-resistant KD in children is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of infliximab alone or in combination with IVIG to IVIG. Eligible randomized and non-randomized trials were retrieved by searching literature databases prior to May 31, 2023. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for dichotomous variables, and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was estimated for continuous variables. A total of 14 eligible studies comprising 1257 participants were included. In refractory KD, infliximab alone was associated with a higher effectiveness rate (OR = 4.48, 95% CI 2.67-7.52) and defervescence rate (OR = 5.01, 95% CI 2.99-8.37) and resulted in a 1.08-day-shorter duration of fever (95% CI 0.61-1.55, P < 0.001) and 1.36-day-shorter length of hospital stay (95% CI 0.65-2.08) compared with IVIG. Incidences of coronary artery lesions (CALs), newly developing CALs, and CAL regression did not differ between both groups. For initial treatment of KD, infliximab in addition to IVIG led to a nominally significant higher effectiveness rate (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.02-5.01) and a larger reduction of right coronary artery Z score (MD = -0.24, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.21) but did not show additional efficacy in improving other outcomes. The safety profile was similar between both groups.   Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrates that infliximab alone is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for IVIG-resistant KD. The additional efficacy of infliximab to IVIG for initial treatment of KD is limited. More large and high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of infliximab, especially for intensification of primary treatment for KD. What is Known: • Infliximab is a novel monoclonal antibody specifically blocking tumor necrosis factor-alpha and is approved for treatment of several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. • The efficacy of infliximab in treating children with Kawasaki disease is controversial. What is New: • Infliximab is an effective and safe treatment for children with refractory Kawasaki disease but adds limited efficacy to intravenous immunoglobulin for initial treatment of Kawasaki disease.

Infliximab for maintenance of medically-induced remission in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralises tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) which is present in high levels in the blood serum, mucosa and stool of patients with Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of infliximab for maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease. SEARCH METHODS: On 31 August, 2021 and 23 June, 2023, we searched CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which infliximab was compared to placebo or another active comparator for maintenance, remission, or response in patients with Crohn's disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of review authors independently selected studies and conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We expressed outcomes as risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Our primary outcome was clinical relapse. Secondary outcomes were loss of clinical response, endoscopic relapse, and withdrawal due to serious and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 1257 participants were included. They were conducted between 1999 and 2022; seven RCTs included biologically-naive patients, and the remaining two included a mix of naive/not naive patients. Three studies included patients in clinical remission, five included patients with a mix of activity scores, and one study included biologic responders with active disease at baseline. All studies allowed some form of concomitant medication during their duration. One study exclusively included patients with fistulating disease. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 69 years old. All but one single-centre RCT were multicentre RCTs. Four studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies, two had a mix of commercial and public funding, and two had public funding. Infliximab is probably superior to placebo in preventing clinical relapse in patients who have mixed levels of clinical disease activity at baseline, and are not naive to biologics (56% vs 75%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.84, NNTB = 5, moderate-certainty evidence). We cannot draw any conclusions on loss of clinical response (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.96), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.19), or serious adverse events (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.00) because the evidence is very low certainty. Infliximab combined with purine analogues is probably superior to purine analogues for clinical relapse (12% vs 59%, RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.42, NNTB = 2, moderate-certainty evidence), for patients in remission, and who are not naive to biologics. We cannot draw any conclusions on withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.49), and serious adverse events (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.64) because the evidence is very low certainty. We cannot draw any conclusions about the effects of infliximab on serious adverse events compared to purine analogues (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.68) for a population in remission at baseline because the evidence is very low certainty. There was no evidence available for the outcomes of clinical relapse, loss of clinical response, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Infliximab may be equivalent to biosimilar for clinical relapse (47% vs 40% RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.69), and it may be slightly less effective in averting loss of clinical response (49% vs 32%, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.23, low-certainty evidence), for a population with mixed/low disease activity at baseline. Infliximab may be less effective than biosimilar in averting withdrawals due to adverse events (27% vs 0%, RR 20.73, 95% CI 2.86 to 150.33, low-certainty evidence). Infliximab may be equivalent to biosimilar for serious adverse events (10% vs 10%, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.50, low-certainty evidence). We cannot draw any conclusions on the effects of subcutaneous biosimilar compared with intravenous biosimilar on clinical relapse (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.57), loss of clinical response (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.25), and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.97) for an active disease population with clinical response at baseline because the evidence is of very low certainty. We cannot draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab compared to adalimumab on loss of clinical response (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.59), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.72), serious adverse events (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.54) for an active disease population with clinical response at baseline because the evidence is of very low certainty. There was no evidence available for the outcome of clinical relapse. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is probably more effective in preventing clinical relapse than placebo (moderate-certainty evidence). Infliximab in combination with purine analogues is probably more effective in preventing clinical and endoscopic relapse than purine analogues alone (moderate-certainty evidence). No conclusions can be drawn regarding prevention of loss of clinical response, occurrence of withdrawals due to adverse events, or total adverse events due to very low-certainty evidence for both of these comparisons. There may be little or no difference in prevention of clinical relapse, withdrawal due to adverse events or total adverse events between infliximab and a biosimilar (low-certainty evidence). Infliximab may lead to more loss of clinical response than a biosimilar (low-certainty evidence). We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions about other comparisons and outcomes related to missing data or very low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision and risk of bias. Further research should focus on comparisons with other active therapies for maintaining remission, as well as ensuring adequate power calculations and reporting of methods.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy may not be safe during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) affects reproductive-aged women. Active disease can lead to decreased fertility. Although the vast majority of international guidelines recommend for the continuation of anti-TNF-α during pregnancy, recent studies have raised concerns about the safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy during pregnancy, both for patients and for physicians. METHODS: Studies that evaluate the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnant women with IBD were identified using bibliographical searches. An updated meta-analysis was performed for pregnancy outcomes, such as live birth, abortion, still birth, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal infection. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported. Data on disease activity, timing of anti-TNF-α therapy were collected for further analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies were screened from on-line databases and international meeting abstracts. An increased risk of abortion (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.74; P = 0.04) and preterm birth (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28; P = 0.004), and a decreased risk of live birth (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = 0.002]) were found in the anti-TNF-α therapy group compared with the control group (no use of anti-TNF-α therapy). The subgroup analyses based on the disease activity showed there is no significant association between the use of anti-TNF-α therapy during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes of abortion, preterm birth, and live birth. The rates of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities in the anti-TNF-α therapy group were not significantly different from those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the risks of still birth, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities; however it may be assicated with increased risks of abortion and preterm birth, which are accompanied by a lower rate of live birth. Although these findings may be confounding by potential disease activity, they offer some opposite viewpoints with biologic agent use. Therefore, more studies are required to further confirm the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in pregnancy with IBD.

Risk factors for infliximab-induced infusion reactions based on a retrospective study of medical information.

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab is indicated for a wide range of diseases, and infusion reactions (IRs) have been reported after infliximab administration in 17.6% of patients in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for IRs before the administration of infliximab based on available patient information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with infliximab. Data were compared between patients with and without IRs immediately before initiation of infliximab. RESULTS: Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (odds ratio (OR), 2.150; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.329 - 3.477; p = 0.002) before infliximab administration was a significant risk factor for developing an IR. CONCLUSION: Patients with elevated CRP levels before therapy initiation may require more careful monitoring after infliximab administration.

Subcutaneous infliximab CT-P13 without intravenous induction in psoriatic arthritis: A case report and pharmacokinetic considerations.

INTRODUCTION: The biosimilar CT-P13, the first and only subcutaneous (SC) infliximab formulation, is recommended for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and can be administered as a maintenance treatment, to be started 4 weeks after the induction treatment with 2 intravenous (IV) infliximab infusions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment with SC infliximab without prior IV infusion induction to meet patient needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the ethics review board and based on the schedule approved for rheumatoid arthritis, SC induction was performed with infliximab CT-P13 120 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by an injection of 120 mg every 2 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 months of therapy, joint symptoms were resolved, inflammation parameters were normalized (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) reduced from 42 to 16 mm/h, and C-reactive protein from 1.74 to 0.43 mg/dL), and clinical assessment parameters were improved. After 9 months of therapy, the clinical data remained stable, with no adverse events or local side effects. CONCLUSION: SC infliximab was successfully used without previous IV infusion induction. Although, to date, the induction of PsA treatment via the SC route is not foreseen, the known pharmacokinetic properties and the outcome improvements observed in our patient show that subcutaneous treatment induction, as is already done in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is also possible.

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections. METHODS: Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections. RESULTS: In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 µg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 µg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 µg/mL versus 5.5 µg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 µg/mL versus 9.9 µg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

Transient second-degree type 2 atrioventricular block after infliximab infusion in a patient with Crohn's disease and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Current treatments for patients in the active phase of Crohn's disease (CD) include conventional treatments and biological treatments. Infliximab (IFX), a TNF-α antagonist, is recommended to induce remission in patients with moderate-to-severe CD who have not responded to conventional therapy. IFX terminates the inflammatory cascade by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and caspase signaling pathways and increases the apoptosis of activated T cells in inflamed tissues.

Infliximab-induced psoriasis in an ulcerative colitis patient successfully treated with guselkumab.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors such as infliximab (IFX) are used to treat UC. But TNF inhibitors can induce psoriasis, which was characterized by IL-17/IL-22 expressing Th17 cells and IFN-γ expressing Th1 cells, with increased expression of Th17 cells correlated with more severe skin lesions and a need for Ustekinumab (UST) therapy1. UST is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the p40 subunit of the interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23. It has shown remarkable efficacy in psoriasis and UC2. Guselkumab, a subcutaneously administered fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the p19 subunit of IL-23, is approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis3. It was shown to be efficacious in patients with prior failure of other biologics such as UST and was also observed in the treatment of psoriasis localized in difficult-to-treat body regions including the scalp, palms, soles, and fingernails. We report a case of successful use of guselkumab to treat a UC patient with IFX-induced psoriasis that was refractory to UST therapy.

Infliximab-induced amicrobial pustulosis of the folds in a patient with Crohn disease.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors may paradoxically induce pustular eruptions, most of which are classified as pustular psoriasis. Amicrobial pustulosis of the folds (APF) is a much rarer entity that was recently recognized to occur in the setting of chronic anti-TNF therapy and inflammatory bowel disease, with 12 existing cases in the literature. Amicrobial pustulosis of the folds is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by aseptic pustules involving the major and minor skin folds, genital regions, and scalp. Herein, we report an additional case of paradoxical APF induced by chronic infliximab therapy in a patient with Crohn disease.

Merkel cell carcinoma associated with TNF inhibitor therapy: a systematic review of case reports.

A rare neuroendocrine skin cancer called Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) primarily affects elderly people. The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the impact of immunosuppressive medications, particularly TNF inhibitors, on the emergence of MCC. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched. Study articles were screened by title and abstract at Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute, then a full-text assessment was implemented. RESULTS: A total of eight case reports with 9 patients were included. Of the total population, seven were women and only two were men. Their age ranged from 31 to 73 years. More than half the population (5 cases) were being treated for rheumatoid arthritis. All received TNF inhibitors that were associated with the induction of MCC. CONCLUSION: We found that it is essential for physicians to explain potential cancer risks to patients before starting long-term immunosuppressive therapy and to conduct routine checks for MCC and other side effects. TNF inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab) were all associated with MCC development. Women constituted the majority of cases and most were elderly.

[Translated article] Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions to Tumor Necrosis α Inhibitors: A Review of 30 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat different inflammatory diseases. Although these biologics have an adequate safety profile, they have been associated with paradoxical reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients on TNF inhibitor therapy who developed a paradoxical skin reaction and were seen at the dermatology department of Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí in Sabadell, Spain. RESULTS: We collected data on 30 patients under treatment with a TNF inhibitor who developed an immune-mediated skin reaction in the form of psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6.7%), or neutrophilic dermatitis (3.3%). The most common drugs involved were adalimumab (56.7%) and infliximab (40%). Psoriasiform reactions mostly manifested as generalized plaques (62.9%) or palmoplantar pustulosis (37%). Thirteen patients (43.3%) continued on the same TNF inhibitor and 12 of them (92.3%) achieved partial or complete resolution of lesions. Five patients were switched to a different TNF inhibitor, but none of them achieved complete resolution. Eight patients were switched to a biologic with a different target, and 5 of them (62.5%) achieved partial or complete resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical reactions during TNF inhibitor therapy do not always require a change of treatment. In our series, the addition of a topical and/or systemic treatment resolved the skin lesions in more than half of the patients, and switching to a drug with a different target was more effective. A change of strategy should be contemplated in more serious cases.