Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 552
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Cell ; 167(5): 1188-1200, 2016 11 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27863240

ABSTRACT

Understanding how transcriptional enhancers control over 20,000 protein-coding genes to maintain cell-type-specific gene expression programs in all human cells is a fundamental challenge in regulatory biology. Recent studies suggest that gene regulatory elements and their target genes generally occur within insulated neighborhoods, which are chromosomal loop structures formed by the interaction of two DNA sites bound by the CTCF protein and occupied by the cohesin complex. Here, we review evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease. Insulated neighborhoods are a powerful paradigm for gene control that provides new insights into development and disease.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Animals , CCCTC-Binding Factor , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Humans , Insulator Elements , Mammals/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism
2.
Cell ; 166(2): 358-368, 2016 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27293191

ABSTRACT

Transcription is episodic, consisting of a series of discontinuous bursts. Using live-imaging methods and quantitative analysis, we examine transcriptional bursting in living Drosophila embryos. Different developmental enhancers positioned downstream of synthetic reporter genes produce transcriptional bursts with similar amplitudes and duration but generate very different bursting frequencies, with strong enhancers producing more bursts than weak enhancers. Insertion of an insulator reduces the number of bursts and the corresponding level of gene expression, suggesting that enhancer regulation of bursting frequency is a key parameter of gene control in development. We also show that linked reporter genes exhibit coordinated bursting profiles when regulated by a shared enhancer, challenging conventional models of enhancer-promoter looping.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/analysis , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Insulator Elements , Male , Promoter Regions, Genetic
3.
Cell ; 155(1): 15-6, 2013 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24074855

ABSTRACT

Insulators drive nuclear organization by blocking or facilitating interactions between DNA regulatory elements. Ong et al. show that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of insulator binding proteins modulates their ability to physically interact with distant regulatory elements, implicating posttranslational modifications of nonhistone proteins in genome architecture.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Insect/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Insulator Elements , Poly Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose/metabolism , Animals
4.
Cell ; 155(1): 148-59, 2013 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24055367

ABSTRACT

Insulators mediate inter- and intrachromosomal contacts to regulate enhancer-promoter interactions and establish chromosome domains. The mechanisms by which insulator activity can be regulated to orchestrate changes in the function and three-dimensional arrangement of the genome remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that Drosophila insulator proteins are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated and that mutation of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (Parp) gene impairs their function. This modification is not essential for DNA occupancy of insulator DNA-binding proteins dCTCF and Su(Hw). However, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of K566 in CP190 promotes protein-protein interactions with other insulator proteins, association with the nuclear lamina, and insulator activity in vivo. Consistent with these findings, the nuclear clustering of CP190 complexes is disrupted in Parp mutant cells. Importantly, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation facilitates intrachromosomal interactions between insulator sites measured by 4C. These data suggest that the role of insulators in organizing the three-dimensional architecture of the genome may be modulated by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Insect/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Insulator Elements , Poly Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose/metabolism , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Mutation , Nuclear Matrix/metabolism , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/genetics , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/metabolism , Polytene Chromosomes/metabolism
5.
Mol Cell ; 73(2): 250-263.e5, 2019 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527662

ABSTRACT

Metazoan chromosomes are sequentially partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs) and then into smaller sub-domains. One class of sub-domains, insulated neighborhoods, are proposed to spatially sequester and insulate the enclosed genes through self-association and chromatin looping. However, it has not been determined functionally whether promoter-enhancer interactions and gene regulation are broadly restricted to within these loops. Here, we employed published datasets from murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) to identify insulated neighborhoods that confine promoter-enhancer interactions and demarcate gene regulatory regions. To directly address the functionality of these regions, we depleted estrogen-related receptor ß (Esrrb), which binds the Mediator co-activator complex, to impair enhancers of genes within 222 insulated neighborhoods without causing mESC differentiation. Esrrb depletion reduces Mediator binding, promoter-enhancer looping, and expression of both nascent RNA and mRNA within the insulated neighborhoods without significantly affecting the flanking genes. Our data indicate that insulated neighborhoods represent functional regulons in mammalian genomes.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Mammalian , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Insulator Elements , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/physiology , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Binding Sites , CCCTC-Binding Factor/genetics , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Databases, Genetic , Down-Regulation , Mice , Protein Binding , RNA, Messenger/biosynthesis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Cohesins
6.
Genome Res ; 32(3): 425-436, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35082140

ABSTRACT

The specificity of interactions between genomic regulatory elements and potential target genes is influenced by the binding of insulator proteins such as CTCF, which can act as potent enhancer blockers when interposed between an enhancer and a promoter in a reporter assay. But not all CTCF sites genome-wide function as insulator elements, depending on cellular and genomic context. To dissect the influence of genomic context on enhancer blocker activity, we integrated reporter constructs with promoter-only, promoter and enhancer, and enhancer blocker configurations at hundreds of thousands of genomic sites using the Sleeping Beauty transposase. Deconvolution of reporter activity by genomic position reveals distinct expression patterns subject to genomic context, including a compartment of enhancer blocker reporter integrations with robust expression. The high density of integration sites permits quantitative delineation of characteristic genomic context sensitivity profiles and their decomposition into sensitivity to both local and distant DNase I hypersensitive sites. Furthermore, using a single-cell expression approach to test the effect of integrated reporters for differential expression of nearby endogenous genes reveals that CTCF insulator elements do not completely abrogate reporter effects on endogenous gene expression. Collectively, our results lend new insight into genomic regulatory compartmentalization and its influence on the determinants of promoter-enhancer specificity.


Subject(s)
Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Insulator Elements , CCCTC-Binding Factor/genetics , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Genomics , Promoter Regions, Genetic
7.
Mol Cell ; 66(1): 63-76.e6, 2017 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366641

ABSTRACT

Nuclear pore complex components (Nups) have been implicated in transcriptional regulation, yet what regulatory steps are controlled by metazoan Nups remains unclear. We identified the presence of multiple Nups at promoters, enhancers, and insulators in the Drosophila genome. In line with this binding, we uncovered a functional role for Nup98 in mediating enhancer-promoter looping at ecdysone-inducible genes. These genes were found to be stably associated with nuclear pores before and after activation. Although changing levels of Nup98 disrupted enhancer-promoter contacts, it did not affect ongoing transcription but instead compromised subsequent transcriptional activation or transcriptional memory. In support of the enhancer-looping role, we found Nup98 to gain and retain physical interactions with architectural proteins upon stimulation with ecdysone. Together, our data identify Nups as a class of architectural proteins for enhancers and supports a model in which animal genomes use the nuclear pore as an organizing scaffold for inducible poised genes.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Binding Sites , Cell Line , Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Ecdysone/pharmacology , Genotype , Insulator Elements , Mutation , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/metabolism , Phenotype , Protein Binding , RNA Interference , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Transcriptional Activation/drug effects , Transfection
8.
PLoS Genet ; 18(3): e1010110, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324887

ABSTRACT

Germline stem cells (GSCs) are the progenitor cells of the germline for the lifetime of an animal. In Drosophila, these cells reside in a cellular niche that is required for both their maintenance (self-renewal) and differentiation (asymmetric division resulting in a daughter cell that differs from the GSC). The stem cell-daughter cell transition is tightly regulated by a number of processes, including an array of proteins required for genome stability. The germline stem-cell maintenance factor Stonewall (Stwl) associates with heterochromatin, but its molecular function is poorly understood. We performed RNA-Seq on stwl mutant ovaries and found significant derepression of many transposon families but not heterochromatic genes. We also discovered inappropriate expression of multiple classes of genes. Most prominent are testis-enriched genes, including the male germline sex-determination switch Phf7, the differentiation factor bgcn, and a large testis-specific gene cluster on chromosome 2, all of which are upregulated or ectopically expressed in stwl mutant ovaries. Surprisingly, we also found that RNAi knockdown of stwl in somatic S2 cells results in ectopic expression of these testis genes. Using parallel ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq experiments in S2 cells, we discovered that Stwl localizes upstream of transcription start sites and at heterochromatic sequences including repetitive sequences associated with telomeres. Stwl is also enriched at bgcn, suggesting that it directly regulates this essential differentiation factor. Finally, we identify Stwl binding motifs that are shared with known insulator binding proteins. We propose that Stwl affects gene regulation, including repression of male transcripts in the female germline, by binding insulators and establishing chromatin boundaries.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Transcription Factors , Animals , Cell Differentiation , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Female , Germ Cells/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Insulator Elements/genetics , Male , Ovary/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
9.
PLoS Genet ; 18(10): e1010396, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36197938

ABSTRACT

Chromatin insulators are responsible for orchestrating long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters throughout the genome and align with the boundaries of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs). Here, we demonstrate an association between gypsy insulator proteins and the phosphorylated histone variant H2Av (γH2Av), normally a marker of DNA double strand breaks. Gypsy insulator components colocalize with γH2Av throughout the genome, in polytene chromosomes and in diploid cells in which Chromatin IP data shows it is enriched at TAD boundaries. Mutation of insulator components su(Hw) and Cp190 results in a significant reduction in γH2Av levels in chromatin and phosphatase inhibition strengthens the association between insulator components and γH2Av and rescues γH2Av localization in insulator mutants. We also show that γH2Av, but not H2Av, is a component of insulator bodies, which are protein condensates that form during osmotic stress. Phosphatase activity is required for insulator body dissolution after stress recovery. Together, our results implicate the H2A variant with a novel mechanism of insulator function and boundary formation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Insulator Elements/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases/genetics , Polytene Chromosomes/genetics
10.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 50(14): 7906-7924, 2022 08 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819192

ABSTRACT

Chromatin insulators are DNA-protein complexes that can prevent the spread of repressive chromatin and block communication between enhancers and promoters to regulate gene expression. In Drosophila, the gypsy chromatin insulator complex consists of three core proteins: CP190, Su(Hw), and Mod(mdg4)67.2. These factors concentrate at nuclear foci termed insulator bodies, and changes in insulator body localization have been observed in mutants defective for insulator function. Here, we identified NURF301/E(bx), a nucleosome remodeling factor, as a novel regulator of gypsy insulator body localization through a high-throughput RNAi imaging screen. NURF301 promotes gypsy-dependent insulator barrier activity and physically interacts with gypsy insulator proteins. Using ChIP-seq, we found that NURF301 co-localizes with insulator proteins genome-wide, and NURF301 promotes chromatin association of Su(Hw) and CP190 at gypsy insulator binding sites. These effects correlate with NURF301-dependent nucleosome repositioning. At the same time, CP190 and Su(Hw) both facilitate recruitment of NURF301 to chromatin. Finally, Oligopaint FISH combined with immunofluorescence revealed that NURF301 promotes 3D contact between insulator bodies and gypsy insulator DNA binding sites, and NURF301 is required for proper nuclear positioning of gypsy binding sites. Our data provide new insights into how a nucleosome remodeling factor and insulator proteins cooperatively contribute to nuclear organization.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Insulator Elements/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nucleosomes/genetics , Nucleosomes/metabolism
11.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(39)2021 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34531299

ABSTRACT

Habituation and sensitization (nonassociative learning) are among the most fundamental forms of learning and memory behavior present in organisms that enable adaptation and learning in dynamic environments. Emulating such features of intelligence found in nature in the solid state can serve as inspiration for algorithmic simulations in artificial neural networks and potential use in neuromorphic computing. Here, we demonstrate nonassociative learning with a prototypical Mott insulator, nickel oxide (NiO), under a variety of external stimuli at and above room temperature. Similar to biological species such as Aplysia, habituation and sensitization of NiO possess time-dependent plasticity relying on both strength and time interval between stimuli. A combination of experimental approaches and first-principles calculations reveals that such learning behavior of NiO results from dynamic modulation of its defect and electronic structure. An artificial neural network model inspired by such nonassociative learning is simulated to show advantages for an unsupervised clustering task in accuracy and reducing catastrophic interference, which could help mitigate the stability-plasticity dilemma. Mott insulators can therefore serve as building blocks to examine learning behavior noted in biology and inspire new learning algorithms for artificial intelligence.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Aplysia/physiology , Artificial Intelligence , Insulator Elements , Neural Networks, Computer , Nickel/chemistry , Synapses/physiology , Animals , Electrons , Models, Neurological , Neuronal Plasticity
12.
PLoS Genet ; 17(4): e1009536, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901190

ABSTRACT

Several distinct activities and functions have been described for chromatin insulators, which separate genes along chromosomes into functional units. Here, we describe a novel mechanism of functional separation whereby an insulator prevents gene repression. When the homie insulator is deleted from the end of a Drosophila even skipped (eve) locus, a flanking P-element promoter is activated in a partial eve pattern, causing expression driven by enhancers in the 3' region to be repressed. The mechanism involves transcriptional read-through from the flanking promoter. This conclusion is based on the following. Read-through driven by a heterologous enhancer is sufficient to repress, even when homie is in place. Furthermore, when the flanking promoter is turned around, repression is minimal. Transcriptional read-through that does not produce anti-sense RNA can still repress expression, ruling out RNAi as the mechanism in this case. Thus, transcriptional interference, caused by enhancer capture and read-through when the insulator is removed, represses eve promoter-driven expression. We also show that enhancer-promoter specificity and processivity of transcription can have decisive effects on the consequences of insulator removal. First, a core heat shock 70 promoter that is not activated well by eve enhancers did not cause read-through sufficient to repress the eve promoter. Second, these transcripts are less processive than those initiated at the P-promoter, measured by how far they extend through the eve locus, and so are less disruptive. These results highlight the importance of considering transcriptional read-through when assessing the effects of insulators on gene expression.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Insulator Elements/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/genetics , RNA, Antisense/genetics , Transcription, Genetic
13.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731837

ABSTRACT

Chromatin architecture is critical for the temporal and tissue-specific activation of genes that determine eukaryotic development. The functional interaction between enhancers and promoters is controlled by insulators and tethering elements that support specific long-distance interactions. However, the mechanisms of the formation and maintenance of long-range interactions between genome regulatory elements remain poorly understood, primarily due to the lack of convenient model systems. Drosophila became the first model organism in which architectural proteins that determine the activity of insulators were described. In Drosophila, one of the best-studied DNA-binding architectural proteins, Su(Hw), forms a complex with Mod(mdg4)-67.2 and CP190 proteins. Using a combination of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and attP-dependent integration technologies, we created a model system in which the promoters and enhancers of two reporter genes are separated by 28 kb. In this case, enhancers effectively stimulate reporter gene promoters in cis and trans only in the presence of artificial Su(Hw) binding sites (SBS), in both constructs. The expression of the mutant Su(Hw) protein, which cannot interact with CP190, and the mutation inactivating Mod(mdg4)-67.2, lead to the complete loss or significant weakening of enhancer-promoter interactions, respectively. The results indicate that the new model system effectively identifies the role of individual subunits of architectural protein complexes in forming and maintaining specific long-distance interactions in the D. melanogaster model.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , CRISPR-Cas Systems , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromatin/genetics , Insulator Elements/genetics , Binding Sites , Protein Binding , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Gene Editing/methods , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins
14.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(D1): D1094-D1101, 2021 01 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095860

ABSTRACT

Most mutations in cancer genomes occur in the non-coding regions with unknown impact on tumor development. Although the increase in the number of cancer whole-genome sequences has revealed numerous putative non-coding cancer drivers, their information is dispersed across multiple studies making it difficult to understand their roles in tumorigenesis of different cancer types. We have developed CNCDatabase, Cornell Non-coding Cancer driver Database (https://cncdatabase.med.cornell.edu/) that contains detailed information about predicted non-coding drivers at gene promoters, 5' and 3' UTRs (untranslated regions), enhancers, CTCF insulators and non-coding RNAs. CNCDatabase documents 1111 protein-coding genes and 90 non-coding RNAs with reported drivers in their non-coding regions from 32 cancer types by computational predictions of positive selection using whole-genome sequences; differential gene expression in samples with and without mutations; or another set of experimental validations including luciferase reporter assays and genome editing. The database can be easily modified and scaled as lists of non-coding drivers are revised in the community with larger whole-genome sequencing studies, CRISPR screens and further experimental validations. Overall, CNCDatabase provides a helpful resource for researchers to explore the pathological role of non-coding alterations in human cancers.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenesis/genetics , Databases, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genome, Human , Neoplasms/genetics , 3' Untranslated Regions , 5' Untranslated Regions , Carcinogenesis/metabolism , Carcinogenesis/pathology , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Genes, Reporter , Humans , Insulator Elements , Luciferases/genetics , Luciferases/metabolism , Mutation , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Open Reading Frames , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA, Untranslated/classification , RNA, Untranslated/genetics , RNA, Untranslated/metabolism , Untranslated Regions , Whole Genome Sequencing
15.
Mol Biol (Mosk) ; 57(1): 109-123, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36976746

ABSTRACT

CP190 protein is one of the key components of Drosophila insulator complexes, and its study is important for understanding the mechanisms of gene regulation during cell differentiation. However, Cp190 mutants die before reaching adulthood, which significantly complicates the study of its functions in imago. To overcome this problem and to investigate the regulatory effects of CP190 in adult tissues development, we have designed a conditional rescue system for Cp190 mutants. Using Cre/loxP-mediated recombination, the rescue construct containing Cp190 coding sequence is effectively eliminated specifically in spermatocytes, allowing us to study the effect of the mutation in male germ cells. Using high-throughput transcriptome analysis we determined the function of CP190 on gene expression in germline cells. Cp190 mutation was found to have opposite effects on tissue-specific genes, which expression is repressed by CP190, and housekeeping genes, that require CP190 for activation. Mutation of Cp190 also promoted expression of a set of spermatocyte differentiation genes that are regulated by tMAC transcriptional complex. Our results indicate that the main function of CP190 in the process of spermatogenesis is the coordination of interactions between differentiation genes and their specific transcriptional activators.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Animals , Male , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Spermatocytes/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Insulator Elements
16.
Genome Res ; 29(5): 750-761, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30948436

ABSTRACT

Coordinated changes of DNA (de)methylation, nucleosome positioning, and chromatin binding of the architectural protein CTCF play an important role for establishing cell-type-specific chromatin states during differentiation. To elucidate molecular mechanisms that link these processes, we studied the perturbed DNA modification landscape in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) carrying a double knockout (DKO) of the Tet1 and Tet2 dioxygenases. These enzymes are responsible for the conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) into its hydroxymethylated (5hmC), formylated (5fC), or carboxylated (5caC) forms. We determined changes in nucleosome positioning, CTCF binding, DNA methylation, and gene expression in DKO ESCs and developed biophysical models to predict differential CTCF binding. Methylation-sensitive nucleosome repositioning accounted for a significant portion of CTCF binding loss in DKO ESCs, whereas unmethylated and nucleosome-depleted CpG islands were enriched for CTCF sites that remained occupied. A number of CTCF sites also displayed direct correlations with the CpG modification state: CTCF was preferentially lost from sites that were marked with 5hmC in wild-type (WT) cells but not from 5fC-enriched sites. In addition, we found that some CTCF sites can act as bifurcation points defining the differential methylation landscape. CTCF loss from such sites, for example, at promoters, boundaries of chromatin loops, and topologically associated domains (TADs), was correlated with DNA methylation/demethylation spreading and can be linked to down-regulation of neighboring genes. Our results reveal a hierarchical interplay between cytosine modifications, nucleosome positions, and DNA sequence that determines differential CTCF binding and regulates gene expression.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/enzymology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , 5-Methylcytosine/chemistry , Animals , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Cell Line , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Dioxygenases , Insulator Elements/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Nucleosomes/enzymology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism
17.
Transgenic Res ; 31(6): 647-660, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053433

ABSTRACT

Insulators in vertebrates play a role in genome architecture and orchestrate temporo-spatial enhancer-promoter interactions. In plants, insulators and their associated binding factors have not been documented as of yet, largely as a result of a lack of characterized insulators. In this study, we took a comprehensive strategy to identify and validate the enhancer-blocking insulator CW198. We show that a 1.08-kb CW198 fragment from Arabidopsis can, when interposed between an enhancer and a promoter, efficiently abrogate the activation function of both constitutive and floral organ-specific enhancers in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants. In plants, both transcriptional crosstalk and spreading of histone modifications were rarely detectable across CW198, which resembles the insulation property observed across the CTCF insulator in the mammalian genome. Taken together, our findings support that CW198 acts as an enhancer-blocking insulator in both Arabidopsis and tobacco. The significance of the present findings and their relevance to the mitigation of mutual interference between enhancers and promoters, as well as multiple promoters in transgenes, is discussed.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis , Insulator Elements , Animals , Insulator Elements/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Arabidopsis/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transgenes/genetics , Nicotiana/genetics , Mammals/genetics
18.
Nature ; 529(7584): 110-4, 2016 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26700815

ABSTRACT

Gain-of-function IDH mutations are initiating events that define major clinical and prognostic classes of gliomas. Mutant IDH protein produces a new onco-metabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate, which interferes with iron-dependent hydroxylases, including the TET family of 5'-methylcytosine hydroxylases. TET enzymes catalyse a key step in the removal of DNA methylation. IDH mutant gliomas thus manifest a CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP), although the functional importance of this altered epigenetic state remains unclear. Here we show that human IDH mutant gliomas exhibit hypermethylation at cohesin and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)-binding sites, compromising binding of this methylation-sensitive insulator protein. Reduced CTCF binding is associated with loss of insulation between topological domains and aberrant gene activation. We specifically demonstrate that loss of CTCF at a domain boundary permits a constitutive enhancer to interact aberrantly with the receptor tyrosine kinase gene PDGFRA, a prominent glioma oncogene. Treatment of IDH mutant gliomaspheres with a demethylating agent partially restores insulator function and downregulates PDGFRA. Conversely, CRISPR-mediated disruption of the CTCF motif in IDH wild-type gliomaspheres upregulates PDGFRA and increases proliferation. Our study suggests that IDH mutations promote gliomagenesis by disrupting chromosomal topology and allowing aberrant regulatory interactions that induce oncogene expression.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glioma/enzymology , Glioma/genetics , Insulator Elements/genetics , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Oncogenes/genetics , Base Sequence , Binding Sites , CCCTC-Binding Factor , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Chromatin/drug effects , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , CpG Islands/genetics , DNA Methylation/drug effects , DNA Methylation/genetics , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Glioma/drug therapy , Glioma/pathology , Glutarates/metabolism , Humans , Insulator Elements/drug effects , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/chemistry , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Phenotype , Protein Binding , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Up-Regulation , Cohesins
19.
Mol Cell ; 53(4): 672-81, 2014 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24486021

ABSTRACT

Eukaryotic chromosomes are partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs) that are demarcated by distinct insulator-binding proteins (IBPs) in Drosophila. Whether IBPs regulate specific long-range contacts and how this may impact gene expression remains unclear. Here we identify "indirect peaks" of multiple IBPs that represent their distant sites of interactions through long-range contacts. Indirect peaks depend on protein-protein interactions among multiple IBPs and their common cofactors, including CP190, as confirmed by high-resolution analyses of long-range contacts. Mutant IBPs unable to interact with CP190 impair long-range contacts as well as the expression of hundreds of distant genes that are specifically flanked by indirect peaks. Regulation of distant genes strongly correlates with RNAPII pausing, highlighting how this key transcriptional stage may trap insulator-based long-range interactions. Our data illustrate how indirect peaks may decipher gene regulatory networks through specific long-range interactions.


Subject(s)
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation/methods , Gene Expression Regulation , Insulator Elements/physiology , RNA Polymerase II/metabolism , Animals , Binding Sites , CCCTC-Binding Factor , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Gene Regulatory Networks , Mutation , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Protein Interaction Mapping , RNA Interference , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
20.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 116(27): 13462-13467, 2019 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31209019

ABSTRACT

Boundaries in the bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that drive parasegment-specific expression of the Hox genes Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B The Fab-7 boundary is located between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains and has two key functions: blocking cross-talk between these domains and at the same time promoting communication (boundary bypass) between iab-6 and the Abd-B promoter. Using a replacement strategy, we found that multimerized binding sites for the architectural proteins Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF function as conventional insulators and block cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains; however, they lack bypass activity, and iab-6 is unable to regulate Abd-B Here we show that an ∼200-bp sequence of dHS1 from the Fab-7 boundary rescues the bypass defects of these multimerized binding sites. The dHS1 sequence is bound in embryos by a large multiprotein complex, Late Boundary Complex (LBC), that contains the zinc finger proteins CLAMP and GAF. Using deletions and mutations in critical GAGAG motifs, we show that bypass activity correlates with the efficiency of recruitment of LBC components CLAMP and GAF to the artificial boundary. These results indicate that LBC orchestrates long-distance communication between the iab-6 regulatory domain and the Abd-B gene, while the Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF proteins function to block local cross-talk between the neighboring regulatory domains iab-6 and iab-7.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Insulator Elements , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Genes, Insect , Insulator Elements/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL