ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially lethal complication that leads to increased hospitalization, disability and mortality. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in RA. We evaluated whether DMARD treatment is associated with incident AF in patients with seropositive RA (SPRA). METHODS: The South Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database was used to identify patients newly diagnosed with SPRA between 2010 and 2020. A nested case-control analysis was performed to match AF-affected patients to unaffected controls for age, sex, follow-up duration, and index year of SPRA diagnosis at a 1:4 ratio. Adjusted conditional logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors for AF. RESULTS: Of the 108 085 patients with SPRA, 2,629 (2.4%) developed new-onset AF, and the proportion of females was â¼67%. In the matched population, pre-existing comorbidities of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were associated with increased risk of AF. Meanwhile, the use of methotrexate (MTX) decreased the risk of incident AF [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.89], whereas the use of leflunomide (LEF) increased AF (aOR, 1.21). In a subgroup of patients aged ≥50 years, LEF and adalimumab increased the occurrence of AF, while MTX decreased AF in males and LEF increased this risk in females. CONCLUSION: Although the number of subjects developing new-onset AF was small, MTX decreased and LEF increased incident AF in patients with RA. Especially, a distinct pattern of AF risk with DMARDs usage was observed according to age and sex.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Atrial Fibrillation , Female , Male , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Leflunomide , Methotrexate/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Lipophagy is a subset of selective autophagy that specifically degrades lipid droplets and plays an important role in obesity. Leflunomide treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has been associated with weight loss and decreased blood glucose levels, which cannot be attributed to its known side effects. Our prior studies showed that A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide, acts as an inhibitor of S6K1 to sensitize the insulin receptor and control hyperglycemia. Whether the anti-obesity effect of leflunomide is mediated by targeting S6K1 and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report that A77 1726 induced LC3 lipidation and increased the formation of autophagosomes and lipoautolysosomes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes by activating TGF-ß-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), and Unc-51 like autophagy-activated kinase 1 (ULK1). A77 1726 reduced the content of lipid droplets in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, which was blocked by bafilomycin or by beclin-1 knockdown. Similar observations were made in murine adipocytes differentiated from S6K1-/- embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Leflunomide treatment restricted bodyweight gains in ob/ob mice and reduced the visceral fat deposit and the size of adipocytes. Leflunomide treatment induced autophagy in adipose and liver tissues and reduced hepatic lipid contents. Consistently, S6K1 knockout increased the levels of LC3 lipidation in the liver, muscle, and fat of S6K-/- mice. Leflunomide treatment and S6K1 deficiency both induced TAK1, AMPK, and ULK1 phosphorylation in these tissues. These observations collectively suggest that leflunomide controls obesity in part by activating AMPK and inducing lipophagy. Our study provides insights into the mechanisms of leflunomide-mediated anti-obesity activity.
Subject(s)
AMP-Activated Protein Kinases , Autophagy , Mice , Humans , Animals , Leflunomide/pharmacology , AMP-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism , Obesity/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: BK viremia after kidney transplantation (KT) poses significant risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy and impacts graft survival. Conventional treatment involves reduction of immunosuppression, which in turn may increase risk for rejection. To address this dilemma, use of anti-viral therapy with immunosuppressive properties such as leflunomide is an attractive option. METHODS: We performed a multi-center, retrospective chart review to report tolerability and effectiveness of leflunomide use for the eradication of BK viremia and prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy in pediatric KT recipients. RESULTS: Seventy patients prescribed leflunomide were included and were followed up from initiation until 1 year following leflunomide completion. BK viremia was eradicated in 64 (91.4%) patients including 8 of 11 with nephropathy (BKVN) on initial biopsy. Reduced anti-proliferative medication (AP) dosing was not associated with increase in biopsy proven rejection (BPAR). However, complete discontinuation of AP during leflunomide therapy was associated with increase in BPAR in uni- and multivariate logistic regression, as was targeted reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) trough goals. One graft was lost to BKVN. There was no significant association found between time to BK eradication and leflunomide trough concentration, mycophenolate dose reduction, or steroid use (univariate logistic regression). Few leflunomide adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported (most commonly: gastrointestinal, hematologic). CONCLUSION: Leflunomide is a promising adjunctive treatment to immunosuppression reduction for BK virus eradication with minimal ADR. AP reduction, not discontinuation, and judicious reduction in CNI trough goals with close monitoring, is a promising strategy for treatment of BK viremia with concomitant use of leflunomide therapy.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Nephritis, Interstitial , Humans , Child , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Viremia/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcineurin InhibitorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood. Methotrexate has broad immunomodulatory properties and is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). This is an update of a 2001 Cochrane review. It supports a living guideline for children and young people with JIA. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of methotrexate for children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. SEARCH METHODS: The Australian JIA Living Guideline Working Group created a registry of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of JIA by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registries. The date of the most recent search of online databases was 1 February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for RCTs that compared methotrexate with placebo, no treatment, or another DMARD (with or without concomitant therapies) in children and young people (aged up to 18 years) with JIA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. The main comparison was methotrexate versus placebo. Our outcomes were treatment response, sustained clinically inactive disease, function, pain, participant global assessment of well-being, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We identified three new trials in this update, bringing the total number of included RCTs to five (575 participants). Three trials evaluated oral methotrexate versus placebo, one evaluated methotrexate plus intra-articular glucocorticoid (IAGC) therapy versus IAGC therapy alone, and one evaluated methotrexate versus leflunomide. Doses of methotrexate ranged from 5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week in four trials, and participants in the methotrexate group of the remaining trial received 0.5 mg/kg/week. Trial size varied from 31 to 226 participants. The average age of participants ranged from four to 10 years. Most participants were females and most had nonsystemic JIA. The study that evaluated methotrexate plus IAGC therapy versus IAGC therapy alone recruited children and young people with the oligoarticular disease subtype of JIA. Two placebo-controlled trials and the trial of methotrexate versus leflunomide were adequately randomised and blinded, and likely not susceptible to important biases. One placebo-controlled trial may have been susceptible to selection bias due to lack of adequate reporting of randomisation methods. The trial investigating the addition of methotrexate to IAGC therapy was susceptible to performance and detection biases. Methotrexate versus placebo Methotrexate compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people who achieve treatment response up to six months (absolute difference of 163 more per 1000 people; risk ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; 3 trials, 328 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, methotrexate compared with placebo may have little or no effect on pain as measured on an increasing scale of 0 to 100 (mean difference (MD) -1.10 points, 95% CI -9.09 to 6.88; 1 trial, 114 participants), improvement in participant global assessment of well-being (absolute difference of 92 more per 1000 people; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.72; 1 trial, 176 participants), occurrence of serious adverse events (absolute difference of 5 fewer per 1000 people; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.97; 3 trials, 328 participants), and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 3.46, 95% CI 0.60 to 19.79; 3 trials, 328 participants) up to six months. We could not estimate the absolute difference for withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the placebo group. All outcomes were reported within six months of randomisation. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low for all outcomes due to indirectness (suboptimal dosing of methotrexate and diverse outcome measures) and imprecision (few participants and low event rates). No trials reported function or the number of participants with sustained clinically inactive disease. Serious adverse events included liver derangement, abdominal pain, and inadvertent overdose. Methotrexate plus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy versus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy alone Methotrexate plus IAGC therapy compared with IAGC therapy alone may have little or no effect on the probability of sustained clinically inactive disease or the rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to 12 months in children and young people with the oligoarticular subtype of JIA (low-certainty evidence). We could not calculate the absolute difference in withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the control group. We are uncertain if there is any difference between the interventions in the risk of severe adverse events, because none were reported. The study did not report treatment response, function, pain, or participant global assessment of well-being. Methotrexate versus an alternative disease-modifying antirheumatic drug Methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on the probability of treatment response or on function, participant global assessment of well-being, risk of serious adverse events, and rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to four months. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes to low due to imprecision. The study did not report pain or sustained clinically inactive disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oral methotrexate (5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week) compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people achieving treatment response but may have little or no effect on pain or participant global assessment of well-being. Oral methotrexate plus IAGC injections compared to IAGC injections alone may have little or no effect on the likelihood of sustained clinically inactive disease among children and young people with oligoarticular JIA. Similarly, methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on treatment response, function, and participant global assessment of well-being. Serious adverse events due to methotrexate appear to be rare. We will update this review as new evidence becomes available to inform the living guideline.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Child , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Aged , Child, Preschool , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Arthritis, Juvenile/chemically induced , Leflunomide/adverse effects , Australia , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids , Pain/drug therapyABSTRACT
In this study, we wanted to investigate the effectiveness of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in reducing inflammation in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) model using rats. We divided 56 male Sprague-Dawley rats into seven groups and induced RA using complete Freund's adjuvant. Some groups received HBOT, whereas others were given etanercept or leflunomide. We started the treatment on the 10th day after inducing RA and continued it for 18 days. To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments, we measured paw swelling and used X-rays to examine the joints before and after the treatment. We also analysed the levels of two inflammatory markers, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1ß, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, we conducted histological analysis and assessed the expressions of anti-IL-1ß and anti-TNF-α antibodies. All the treatment groups showed a significant decrease in arthritis scores, paw swelling and levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß. The X-ray images revealed improvements in joint structure, and the histopathological analysis showed reduced inflammation and collagen abnormalities. Combining DMARD with HBOT had similar effects to individual therapies, suggesting a cost-effective and potentially safer approach for improving outcomes in rats with RA.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Interleukin-1beta , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Animals , Hyperbaric Oxygenation/methods , Male , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/pharmacology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/metabolism , Rats , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/pharmacology , Arthritis, Experimental/therapy , Arthritis, Experimental/pathology , Arthritis, Experimental/drug therapy , Arthritis, Experimental/metabolism , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Leflunomide/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of immunosuppressive and corticosteroid treatments for Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) remains thoroughly evaluated. We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy. METHODS: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched the references of the included studies. Our protocol followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Eligibility criteria were defined using a PICOS framework. RESULTS: Our study included three articles presenting 342 patient cases. Findings revealed that low-dose corticosteroids combined with the leflunomide group were effective in relieving urine protein excretion (UPE) [mean difference (MD) = -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.30, P < 0.00001] compared with the full-dose corticosteroids group. Regarding serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), complete remission rate, and overall response rate, there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding safety, low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events [odds ratio (OR): 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.91, P = 0.04]. Besides, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory infection, abnormal liver function, diarrhea, herpes zoster, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, pneumonia, diabetes, and urinary tract infection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide are a safe and effective treatment for progressive IgA nephropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022361883.
Subject(s)
Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Humans , Leflunomide/adverse effects , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/drug therapy , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/chemically induced , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Glomerular Filtration RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) is a noneczematous form of allergic contact dermatitis characterized by dermal hyperpigmentation. Allergen avoidance is the cornerstone of therapy, but it is difficult to achieve. The use of immunosuppressives seems rational, but data are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with azathioprine (AZA), leflunomide and allergen avoidance (AA) in patients with PCD. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted on 28 patients with patch test-positive PCD who were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: AZA 2â mg kg-1 daily for 24 weeks + AA (n = 10); leflunomide (LEF) 20â mg daily for 24 weeks + -AA (n = 8); AA alone (n = 10). Patients were followed up for an additional 24 weeks. The Dermal Pigmentation Area and Severity Index (DPASI) score and Hindi Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQOL) were used to assess hyperpigmentation and quality of life (QoL). respectively. RESULTS: Hair colorants (n = 12) and paraphenylenediamine (n = 8) were the most common allergens. Mean (SD) DPASI score decreased from 30.97 (3.69), 32.35 (3.90) and 31.86 (3.47) to 13.78 (4.25), 21.67 (2.99) and 20.64 (3.82) at 48 weeks in the three groups, respectively (P < 0.001); the maximum percentage decline was seen with AZA (56%). Mean (SD) MELASQOL score was reduced in the three treatment groups from 48.0 (6.46), 46.75 (3.69) and 46.6 (4.65) to 19.6 (6.98), 24.5 (5.80) and 24.0 (5.49), respectively, at 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Reductions in DPASI and Hindi MELASQOL scores were significantly correlated. The most frequent adverse event was transaminitis in both the AZA and LEF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on AZA achieved a statistically significantly greater reduction in DPASI and MELASQOL score; therefore, AZA may fulfil an unmet need in PCD treatment. An objective reduction in hyperpigmentation was paralleled by an improvement in QoL score, reiterating the need for active management of this disease.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Melanosis , Humans , Allergens , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Leflunomide/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe a case of rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury potentiated by a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporine, leflunomide, and rosuvastatin in a kidney transplant recipient. CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old male with end-stage kidney disease secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension received a deceased by cardiac death kidney transplant. The patient's medical history included coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia for which he was receiving rosuvastatin 40 mg daily. Five months after transplant, the patient developed BK viremia, which required multiple changes in immunosuppression and resulted in the initiation of leflunomide and cyclosporine modified. The patient used multiple pharmacies and coupon cards that delayed the identification of the DDIs between leflunomide, cyclosporine, and rosuvastatin. Approximately, 13 months after transplant, the biopsy report of the patient's allograft kidney showed acute cellular rejection Banff IB, hypertensive changes, and transplant glomerulopathy. This prompted the patient to receive a 3-day course of methylprednisolone 250 mg intravenous at the outpatient infusion center. Two weeks later, the patient presented to the transplant clinic with lightheadedness, dizziness, weakness, fatigue, bilateral eye drainage, and a decrease in appetite and was admitted to the hospital for further workup. On admission, creatine kinase was 2080 IU/L with myoglobin of 7601 ng/mL. The patient's diagnosis was statin myopathy with possible rhabdomyolysis acute kidney injury. Likely contributing factors included cyclosporine, leflunomide, and rosuvastatin DDI and administration of high-dose methylprednisolone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This case demonstrates the importance of pharmacist involvement throughout all phases of care in a kidney transplant recipient.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Cyclosporine , Drug Interactions , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Leflunomide , Pharmacists , Rhabdomyolysis , Rosuvastatin Calcium , Humans , Male , Rhabdomyolysis/chemically induced , Aged , Rosuvastatin Calcium/adverse effects , Rosuvastatin Calcium/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Leflunomide/adverse effects , Leflunomide/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgeryABSTRACT
A 5 yr old castrated male bichon frise presented with chronic bilateral uveitis that had previously been controlled with systemic steroid administration for 6 mo, resulting in weight gain, polyuria, and polydipsia. To control the uveitis without systemic side effects, oral cyclosporine was started after discontinuing oral steroid, but discontinued one month later because of severe vomiting. Leflunomide (2 mg/kg q 12 hr) was initiated, and the uveitis symptoms resolved after 2 mo. The dose was tapered according to the remission of clinical signs, with no relapse during the following 13 mo. Leflunomide therapy was then discontinued due to vomiting caused by severe gastroenteritis and pancreatitis, and topical prednisolone monotherapy was continued . At 8 mo after discontinuation of leflunomide, bilateral uveitis recurred, and leflunomide therapy was resumed. However, the patient lost vision due to the progression of clinical signs at 33 mo after commencing leflunomide, and evisceration of the glaucomatous right eye was performed at 43 mo. Histopathologic examination revealed lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration and melanin-laden macrophages in the uveal tissue, and the patient was diagnosed with immune-mediated uveitis. This case indicated that oral leflunomide may be a viable treatment option for canine idiopathic immune-mediated uveitis.
Subject(s)
Dog Diseases , Uveitis , Dogs , Male , Animals , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Uveitis/drug therapy , Uveitis/veterinary , Uveitis/pathology , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Vomiting/veterinaryABSTRACT
Leflunomide (LFND) is an immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) that was approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis. LFND-induced cardiotoxicity was not fully investigated since its approval. We investigated the cardiac injury in male mice and identified the role of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/nuclear factor-κ B (Nrf2/NF-κB) signaling. Male albino mice were assigned into five groups as control, vehicle, and LFND (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg). We investigated cardiac enzymes, histopathology, and the mRNA expression of Nrf2, NF-κB, BAX, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The bioinformatic study identified the interaction between LFND and Nrf2/NF-κB signaling; this was confirmed by amelioration in mRNA expression (0.5- to 0.34-fold decrease in Nrf2 and 2.6- to 4.61-fold increases in NF-κB genes) and increased (1.76- and 2.625-fold) serum creatine kinase (CK) and 1.38- and 2.33-fold increases in creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB). Histopathological results confirmed the dose-dependent effects of LFND on cardiac muscle structure in the form of cytoplasmic, nuclear, and vascular changes in addition to increased collagen deposits and apoptosis which were increased compared to controls especially with LFND 10 mg/kg. The current study elicits the dose-dependent cardiac injury induced by LFND administration and highlights, for the first time, dysregulation in Nrf2/NF-κB signaling.
Subject(s)
Leflunomide , NF-E2-Related Factor 2 , NF-kappa B , Signal Transduction , Animals , Male , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/genetics , NF-kappa B/metabolism , NF-kappa B/genetics , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Mice , Cardiotoxicity , Computational Biology , Myocardium/pathology , Myocardium/metabolism , Antirheumatic Agents , Dose-Response Relationship, DrugABSTRACT
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disorder, is characterized by erosive inflammation of bone and cartilage, leading to progressive joint destruction. Pulmonary involvement occurs in approximately 60% of RA patients, manifests most commonly as interstitial lung disease and, less commonly, as rheumatoid lung nodules. Here, we report a 50-year-old woman, non-smoker, with recurrent cough and sputum of 7 years' duration, accompanied by a chest CT showing multiple cavitary nodules in both lungs. She had been treated empirically at several medical centers and was finally diagnosed with rheumatoid lung nodules. Marked improvement in rheumatoid lung nodules was observed after treatment with tocilizumab in combination with glucocorticoids and leflunomide. The aim of this study was to improve clinicians' understanding of rheumatoid lung nodules by analyzing the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of this case, and reviewing the relevant medical literature.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Glucocorticoids , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , LungABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between MTX, LEF and tacrolimus use and the progression of RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: The Korean RA-ILD cohort prospectively enrolled patients with RA-associated ILD at multiple centres from 2015 to 2018 and followed up with them for 3 years. ILD progression was defined by any of the followings: a decrease of ≥10% in forced vital capacity, a decrease of ≥15% in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, or death from respiratory failure. RESULTS: Of 143 patients, 64 patients experienced ILD progression during a median follow-up period of 33 months. The use of MTX [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.06; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.89], LEF (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.88, 3.46) and tacrolimus (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.72) did not increase the risk of ILD progression. However, the association between LEF use and the risk of ILD progression was significant in subgroups with poor lung function (aHR, 8.42; 95% CI, 2.61, 27.15). Older age, male sex, a shorter RA duration, higher RA disease activity and extensive disease at baseline were independently associated with ILD progression. CONCLUSION: None of the three treatments increased the risk of RA-associated ILD progression, except for LEF, which increased the risk of ILD progression in patients with severe ILD. The appropriate use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs considering RA disease activity and ILD severity would be important for the management of RA-associated ILD.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/chemically induced , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of leflunomide, is a disease-modifying therapy drug used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet the complications associated with this drug remain not fully understood. Here we present the rare case of a 28-year-old female MS patient who developed subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) following teriflunomide treatment. Though SCLE has been reported to be associated with leflunomide, the current report represents the first documented evidence demonstrating SCLE as a potential teriflunomide treatment-related complication. Additionally, a literature review on the leflunomide-induced SCLE was conducted to emphasize the association of SCLE with teriflunomide, specifically amongst the female demographic with a preexisting autoimmune diathesis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old female first presented with MS symptoms in the left upper limb along with blurred vision in the left eye. Medical and family histories were unremarkable. The patient exhibited positive serum biomarkers including ANA, Ro/SSA, La/SSB, and Ro-52 antibodies. Relapsing-remitting MS was diagnosed according to the 2017 McDonald's diagnostic criteria, and remission was achieved upon intravenous administration of methylprednisolone followed by teriflunomide sequential therapy. Three months post-teriflunomide treatment, the patient developed multiple facial cutaneous lesions. SCLE was subsequently diagnosed and was attributed to treatment-related complication. Interventions include oral administration of hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate effectively resolved cutaneous lesions. Discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate treatment led to recurring SCLE symptoms under continuous teriflunomide treatment. Full remission of facial annular plaques was achieved after re-treatment with hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate. The patient's clinical condition remained stable in long-term outpatient follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: As teriflunomide has become a standard disease-modifying therapy for MS, the current case report highlights the importance of monitoring treatment-related complications, specifically in relation to SCLE symptoms.
Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Female , Adult , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Leflunomide/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/chemically induced , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to describe the distinct features of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: Data from the German biologics in pediatric rheumatology registry (Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie) collected between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In 5009 JIA patients, 28 developed confirmed IBD before the age of 18 years: 23 (82.1%) with Crohn disease (CD), 4 (14.3%) with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1 (3.6%) with IBD-unclassified (IBD-U). The incident rate of IBD during 20 years of observation was 0.56% (0.46% for CD, 0.08% for UC, and 0.02% for IBD-U), of whom 20.3% were HLA-B27 positive, 25% had enthesitis-related arthritis, and 14.3% psoriatic arthritis. Within 90 days before IBD diagnosis, 82.1% (n = 23) received treatment with etanercept (ETA), 39.3% (n = 11) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 17.9% (n = 5) systemic corticosteroids, 8 (28.6%) methotrexate (MTX), 14.3% (n = 4) sulfasalazine, 10.7% (n = 3) leflunomide, and 3.6% (n = 1) adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The incidence of IBD was lower in patients treated with MTX, but higher in patients treated with ETA except if ETA was combined with MTX. Also in patients on leflunomide or sulfasalazine, the IBD incidence was higher. CONCLUSIONS: In our JIA cohort, an increased IBD incidence is observed compared to the general population, and the ratio of CD to UC is markedly higher hinting at a distinct phenotype of IBD. Pretreatment with MTX seems to be protective. Treatment with ETA does not prevent IBD development and JIA patients treated with leflunomide and sulfasalazine may be at an increased risk for IBD development.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Biological Products , Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Child , Humans , Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Biological Products/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sulfasalazine/adverse effects , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology (MUE) is a comprehensive term for non-infectious inflammatory brain diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by abnormal autoimmune responses. This study aims to compare the differences in survival and clinical response of MUE according to the adjuvant immunosuppressant use. Medical records of 82 dogs diagnosed with MUE were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall survival time was 769 days (range 14-2687 days). The median survival time for each adjunctive was: leflunomide 1035 days (range 126-2163 days), mycophenolate mofetil 865 days (range 39-2191 days), cyclosporin 441 days (range 11-2176 days), cytosine arabinoside 754 days (range 6-1898 days) and a combination of mycophenolate mofetil and cytosine arabinoside 132 days (range 23-1227 days). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse events according to the immunosuppressants, but moderate to severe anemia was confirmed in 3 patients (18.7%) in the leflunomide group. CONCLUSIONS: The survival time and response rate of MUE dogs differed depending on which adjunctive immunosuppressants were used. Leflunomide showed a long survival time and a relatively good response rate in dogs with MUE. However, a large-scale further study with standardized doses of immunosuppressants and supportive treatment and constant monitoring interval is needed.
Subject(s)
Dog Diseases , Encephalomyelitis , Meningoencephalitis , Humans , Dogs , Animals , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Meningoencephalitis/drug therapy , Meningoencephalitis/veterinary , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Encephalomyelitis/veterinary , Dog Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: IgA vasculitis (IgAV), previously known as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, is the most common vasculitis of childhood but may also occur in adults. This small vessel vasculitis is characterised by palpable purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis or arthralgia and kidney involvement. This is an update of a review first published in 2009 and updated in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of different agents (used singularly or in combination) compared with placebo, no treatment or any other agent for (1) the prevention of severe kidney disease in people with IgAV with or without kidney involvement at onset, (2) the treatment of established severe kidney disease (macroscopic haematuria, proteinuria, nephritic syndrome, nephrotic syndrome with or without acute kidney failure) in IgAV, and (3) the prevention of recurrent episodes of IgAV-associated kidney disease. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 2 February 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions used to prevent or treat kidney disease in IgAV compared with placebo, no treatment or other agents were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from each study. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model, and the results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty studies (1963 enrolled participants) were identified; one three-arm study has been assessed as two studies. Nine studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation (selection bias), and nine studies were at low risk of bias for allocation concealment (selection bias). Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and outcome assessment (detection bias) was at low risk of bias in four and seven studies, respectively. Nine studies reported complete outcome data (attrition bias), while 10 studies reported expected outcomes, so were at low risk of reporting bias. Five studies were at low risk of other bias. Eleven studies evaluated therapy to prevent persistent kidney disease in IgAV with or without kidney involvement at presentation. There was probably no difference in the risk of persistent kidney disease any time after treatment (5 studies, 746 children: RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.32) or at one, three, six and 12 months in children given prednisone for 14 to 28 days at presentation of IgAV compared with placebo or supportive treatment (moderate certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the risk of any persistent kidney disease with antiplatelet therapy (three studies) or heparin (two studies) in children with or without any kidney disease at study entry, although heparin may reduce the risk of proteinuria by three months compared with placebo or no specific treatment (2 studies, 317 children: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.73). One study comparing montelukast with placebo found no differences in outcomes as assessed by severity scale scores. Nine studies examined the treatment of severe IgAV-associated kidney disease. In two studies (one involving 56 children and the other involving 54 adults), there may be no differences in efficacy outcomes or adverse effects with cyclophosphamide compared with placebo or supportive treatment. In two studies, there may be no differences in the numbers achieving remission of proteinuria with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (65 children evaluated) or tacrolimus (142 children evaluated). In three small studies comparing cyclosporin with methylprednisolone (15 children), MMF with azathioprine (26 children), or MMF with leflunomide (19 children), it is unclear whether the treatment had any effect on the numbers in remission or the degree of proteinuria between treatment groups because of small numbers of included participants. In one study comparing plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone with cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone, there may be no difference in the numbers achieving remission. One study compared fosinopril with no specific therapy and reported fosinopril reduced the number of participants with proteinuria. No studies were identified that evaluated the efficacy of therapy on kidney disease in participants with recurrent episodes of IgAV. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no substantial changes in conclusions from this update compared with the initial review or the previous update despite the addition of five studies. From generally low to moderate certainty evidence, we found that there may be little or no benefit in the use of corticosteroids or antiplatelet agents to prevent persistent kidney disease in children with IgAV in participants with no or minimal kidney involvement at presentation. We did not find any studies which evaluated corticosteroids in children presenting with IgAV and nephritic and/or nephrotic syndrome, although corticosteroids are recommended in such children in guidelines. Though heparin may be effective in reducing proteinuria, this potentially dangerous therapy is not justified to prevent serious kidney disease when few children with IgAV develop severe kidney disease. There may be no benefit of cyclophosphamide compared with no specific treatment or corticosteroids. While there may be no benefit in the efficacy of MMF or tacrolimus compared with IV cyclophosphamide in children or adults with IgAV and severe kidney disease, adverse effects, particularly infections, may be lower in MMF or tacrolimus-treated children. Because of small patient numbers and events leading to imprecision in results, it remains unclear whether cyclosporin, MMF or leflunomide have any role in the treatment of children with IgAV and severe kidney disease. We did not identify any studies which evaluated corticosteroids.
Subject(s)
IgA Vasculitis , Kidney Diseases , Vasculitis , Adult , Child , Humans , Fosinopril , IgA Vasculitis/complications , IgA Vasculitis/drug therapy , Leflunomide , Proteinuria , TacrolimusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to develop a highly sensitive, accurate, and reproducible analytical method for the simultaneous detection of LEF and FA in polymeric nanocarriers. SIGNIFICANCE: Leflunomide (LEF), is widely employed in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, long-term delivery of the drug is associated with systemic side effects. Therefore, folate (FA) conjugated LEF nanocarriers were fabricated for targeting the nanocarriers toward activated macrophages. HPLC is considered one of the most sensitive and precise analytical techniques for the simultaneous detection and estimation of different components in a particular sample. METHODS: Analysis was performed on HPLC (Shimadzu 10 A), having a reversed-phase C-18 column (Beckmen, 250 X 4.6 mm, 5 µm) equipped with a photodiode detector set at a wavelength of 260 nm (LEF) and 285 nm (Folic acid). The isocratic mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile, water, and trimethylamine in a ratio of 65:35:0.5 at pH 4. Rapid analysis of both agents was performed, with a total run time of 10 min (FA = 2.1 ± 0.1 min, LEF = 5.9 ± 1 min) at a 1 mL/min flow rate. RESULTS: The assay demonstrated good linearity of 0.9989 of 0.9997 for LEF and FA respectively with a recovery in the range of 95-100%. The method also depicted good specificity, and intra and inter-day precision based on relative standard deviation (RSD) values. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes, that the developed method was helpful in the detection and quantitation of lower values of both agents from polymeric nanocarriers.
HighlightsOptimization and validation of the RP-HPLC method were performed for the simultaneous detection of LEF and FA.Validation was performed on the basis of linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, and robustness in accordance with ICH criteria.Validated analytical procedure was employed for the simultaneous detection of LEF and FA from polymeric nanocarriers.The proposed analytical method is reliable, fast, robust, and can be successfully applied for quantification of % EE, and % DL in polymeric nanocarriers.
Subject(s)
Folic Acid , Polymers , Leflunomide , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Pharmaceutical PreparationsABSTRACT
Diabetic retinopathy continues to progress even when hyperglycemia is terminated, suggesting a 'metabolic memory' phenomenon. Mitochondrial dysfunction is closely associated with the development of diabetic retinopathy, and mitochondria remain dysfunctional. Quality control of mitochondria requires a fine balance between mitochondrial fission-fusion, removal of the damaged mitochondria (mitophagy) and formation of new mitochondria (biogenesis). In diabetes, while mitochondrial fusion protein (Mfn2) is decreased, fission protein (Drp1) is increased, resulting in fragmented mitochondria. Re-institution of normal glycemia fails to reverse mitochondrial fragmentation, and dysfunctional mitochondria continue to accumulate. Our aim was to investigate the direct effect of regulation of the mitochondrial fusion process during normal glycemia that follows a high glucose insult on mitochondrial quality control in the 'metabolic memory' phenomenon. Human retinal endothelial cells, incubated in 20 mM glucose for four days, followed by 5 mM glucose for four additional days, with or without the Mfn2 activator leflunomide, were analyzed for mitochondrial fission (live cell imaging), mitophagy (flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy), and mitochondrial mass (mitochondrial copy numbers and MitoTracker labeling). Mitochondrial health was determined by quantifying mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), respiration rate (Seahorse XF96) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage. Addition of leflunomide during normal glucose exposure that followed high glucose prevented mitochondrial fission, facilitated mitophagy and increased mitochondrial mass. Glucose-induced decrease in mitochondrial respiration and increase in ROS and mtDNA damage were also prevented. Thus, direct regulation of mitochondrial dynamics can help maintain mitochondrial quality control and interfere with the metabolic memory phenomenon, preventing further progression of diabetic retinopathy.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Rats , Animals , Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/metabolism , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Leflunomide/pharmacology , Rats, Wistar , Mitochondria/metabolism , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Glucose/metabolism , Mitochondrial Dynamics , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have compared mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). Leflunomide is an immunosuppressant widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this investigator-initiated study was to compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for LN. METHODS: 270 adult patients with biopsy-confirmed active LN from 7 Chinese Rheumatology Centres were enrolled. All patients received induction therapy with 6-9 months of intravenous cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoids. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) were randomised to receive prednisone in combination with leflunomide or azathioprine as maintenance therapy for 36 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to kidney flare. Secondary outcomes included clinical parameters, extrarenal flare and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were randomly allocated to the leflunomide group (n=108) and azathioprine group (n=107). Kidney flares were observed in 17 (15.7%) leflunomide-treated patients and 19 (17.8%) azathioprine-treated patients. Time to kidney flare did not statistically differ (leflunomide: 16 months vs azathioprine: 14 months, p=0.676). 24-hour proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum C3 and serum C4 improved similarly. Extrarenal flare occurred in two patients from the azathioprine group and one patient from the leflunomide group. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups: leflunomide 56.5% and azathioprine 58.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile of leflunomide are non-inferior to azathioprine for maintenance therapy of LN. Leflunomide may provide a new candidate for maintenance therapy in patients with LN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01172002.
Subject(s)
Azathioprine , Lupus Nephritis , Adult , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Creatinine , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Serum Albumin/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prognostic model for LEF discontinuation with abnormal blood test results. METHODS: Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Gold and Aurum were used for model development and external validation, respectively. Participants prescribed LEF between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2019 were followed up from 6 months after the first general practitioner prescription to the earliest of date of outcome, death, 5 year follow-up or 31 December 2019. Candidate prognostic factors were ascertained using theory and data-driven approaches. Penalized Cox regression was performed to develop the risk equation, followed by internal validation using 500 bootstraps to correct for optimism. Multiple imputation was applied to handle missing data. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination. RESULTS: Data for 1487 and 2329 participants contributing 3140 and 5246 person-years follow-up were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Thirteen candidate predictors were included in the model. Epilepsy and either cytopenia or elevated liver enzymes during the first 6 months of shared-care LEF prescription were strong predictors of drug discontinuation with a hazard ratio of 4.39 (95% CI 1.74, 11.06) and 3.06 (2.15, 4.35), respectively. The unadjusted and optimism-adjusted calibration slope in development data was 1.00 (95% CI 0.75, 1.25) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.47, 0.97), respectively. The calibration slope in validation data was 0.91 (95% CI 0.74, 1.07). The model showed prognostic separation with an optimism-adjusted Royston D statistic of 0.73 (95% CI 0.44, 1.02). CONCLUSION: We have developed and externally validated an easy-to-use prognostic model that may be used to risk stratify monitoring for LEF toxicity and to make informed choices about risks when choosing treatments.