Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 599
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 23(2): 225-243, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) remained one of the challenges to treat due to its complicated mechanisms. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) accelerates neuronal regeneration. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeONPs) also eliminate free radicals in the environment. The present study aims to introduce a combined treatment method of making PCL scaffolds as microenvironments, seeded with CeONPs and the PBMT technique for SCI treatment. METHODS: The surgical hemi-section was used to induce SCI. Immediately after the SCI induction, the scaffold (Sc) was loaded with CeONPs implanted. PBMT began 30 min after SCI induction and lasted for up to 4 weeks. Fifty-six male rats were randomly divided into seven groups. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (an astrocyte marker), Connexin 43 (Con43) (a member of the gap junction), and gap junctions (GJ) (a marker for the transfer of ions and small molecules) expressions were evaluated. The behavioral evaluation was performed by BBB, Acetone, Von Frey, and radiant heat tests. RESULT: The SC + Nano + PBMT group exhibited the most remarkable recovery outcomes. Thermal hyperalgesia responses were mitigated, with the combined approach displaying the most effective relief. Mechanical allodynia and cold allodynia responses were also attenuated by treatments, demonstrating potential pain management benefits. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential of PBMT, combined with CeONPs-loaded scaffolds, in promoting functional motor recovery and alleviating pain-related responses following SCI. The study underscores the intricate interplay between various interventions and their cumulative effects, informing future research directions for enhancing neural repair and pain management strategies in SCI contexts.


Subject(s)
Cerium , Low-Level Light Therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries , Rats , Male , Animals , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Pain/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/radiotherapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Hyperalgesia
2.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 40(1): e12935, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018017

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) is a versatile technique for treating skin diseases. Melasma, a chronic hyperpigmentation condition, has recently been associated with vascular features and dermal photoaging and poses significant management challenges. We review the recent literature on melasma etiology and the evidence supporting PBM as a therapeutic modality for melasma treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in three different databases from May to August 2023, focusing on studies published in the past 10 years. The inclusion criteria comprised full-text studies investigating low-power lasers and/or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro or in vivo models, as well as clinical trials. We excluded studies discussing alternative melasma therapies or lacking experimental data. We identified additional studies by searching the reference lists of the selected articles. RESULTS: We identified nine relevant studies. Clinical studies, in agreement with in vitro experiments and animal models, suggest that PBM effectively reduces melasma-associated hyperpigmentation. Specific wavelengths (red: 630 nm; amber: 585 and 590 nm; infrared: 830 and 850 nm) at radiant exposures between 1 and 20 J/cm2 exert modulatory effects on tyrosinase activity, gene expression, and protein synthesis of melanocytic pathway components, and thus significantly reduce the melanin content. Additionally, PBM is effective in improving the dermal structure and reducing erythema and neovascularization, features recently identified as pathological components of melasma. CONCLUSION: PBM emerges as a promising, contemporary, and non-invasive procedure for treating melasma. Beyond its role in inhibiting melanogenesis, PBM shows potential in reducing erythema and vascularization and improving dermal conditions. However, robust and well-designed clinical trials are needed to determine optimal light parameters and to evaluate the effects of PBM on melasma thoroughly.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation , Low-Level Light Therapy , Melanosis , Animals , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Melanosis/radiotherapy , Melanosis/complications , Lasers , Erythema/etiology
3.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 49, 2024 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280042

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to confirm the effect of small, portable low-level laser therapy (light sources in square configuration: 830 nm GaAs diode 3.2 mW at the center, 4 × 650 nm InGaAIP diodes over the corners) treatment in reducing and enhancing hand function in patients with wrist pain. This study was a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, and home-based self-therapy trial. A total of thirty subjects with wrist pain were enrolled. All participants received low-level laser therapy on painful area at the wrist. The experimental group (n = 15) received laser stimulation, while the control group (n = 15) received sham stimulation using identical equipment that generated only a red light without the laser output. Both groups self-treated for 30 min a day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, total of 15 sessions. The primary outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for wrist pain from 0 (painless) to 10 (extreme pain). The secondary outcomes were measured with patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), grip strength, lateral, palmar, and tip pinch strength. Measures were taken before and after treatment. A total of thirty participants provided outcome data. After the intervention, both groups showed a significant decrease in VAS score, from 4.93 to 3.67 in experimental group, from 5.53 to 4.00 in control group (the experiment group: p = 0.020, the control group: p = 0.003). The experimental group showed a significant improvement in function scale score (p = 0.012), the control group did not. Lateral and pinch strength was significantly improved in the experimental group (p = 0.017) and in the control group (p = 0.034) respectively. There were no side effects in the patients. Medical laser irradiation is a portable and easy-to-use laser irradiator without side effects. Clinical Trial Registration number: KCT0006604.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Wrist , Humans , Prospective Studies , Pain , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Activities of Daily Living , Treatment Outcome
4.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 146, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822948

ABSTRACT

Previous clinical studies have shown that pulsed dye laser (PDL) and intense pulsed light (IPL) are effective for treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea(ETR). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL at three different wavelength bands (broad-band, single-narrow-band, and dual-narrow-band) in treating ETR. Sixty subjects with ETR were randomly categorized into four groups and received one of the following laser treatments: PDL (595 nm), IPL with Delicate Pulse Light (DPL, 500-600 nm), IPL with M22 590 (590-1200 nm), or IPL with M22 vascular filter (530-650 nm and 900-1200 nm). Four treatment sessions were administered at 4-week intervals, with one follow-up session 4 weeks after the final treatment. The efficacy of the four lasers was evaluated by comparing the clinical symptom score, total effective rate, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score before and after treatment. The safety was evaluated by comparing adverse reactions such as pain, purpura, erythematous edema, and blister. All 60 subjects completed the study. Within-group effects showed that the clinical symptom score, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score of all four groups were significantly reduced compared to before treatment (p < 0.001). Between-group effects showed no statistically significant difference among the four laser groups. Safety analysis showed that all four lasers were safe, but the incidence of blister was higher in the M22 vascular group. Nonpurpurogenic PDL, DPL, M22 590, and M22 vascular were equally effective in treating ETR and were well-tolerated. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05360251.


Subject(s)
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy , Lasers, Dye , Rosacea , Humans , Lasers, Dye/therapeutic use , Lasers, Dye/adverse effects , Female , Rosacea/radiotherapy , Rosacea/therapy , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/methods , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/instrumentation , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects
5.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 128, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724798

ABSTRACT

Laser sources have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No large cohort study has evaluated the effect of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). To investigate the efficacy and safety of the ablative fractional 2940-nm Er: YAG laser in combination with medication therapy for the treatment of AGA. We performed a retrospective study between first July 2021 to 30th December 2021. All included patients received oral finasteride and topical minoxidil, or combined with six sessions of Er: YAG laser at 2-week intervals. Patients were divided into medication or combined therapy groups. The efficacy of the two therapies was evaluated by the investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores and the patient's Likert satisfaction scale at week 12 and week 24. Changes in total, terminal and villous hair count, total and terminal hair diameter, and AGA grade were also recorded. Adverse events were evaluated at each follow-up. A total of 192 male patients with AGA were included, including 67 receiving combination treatment, and 125 receiving medication treatment. At week 24, the combination treatment afforded superior outcomes in the IGA score, patient's global assessment, total and terminal hair counts, and diameters (all P<0.05). No severe adverse events were reported in both groups. The combined therapy of ablative fractional Er: YAG laser and medication was superior in treating male AGA than single medication therapy without serious adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Alopecia , Lasers, Solid-State , Humans , Alopecia/therapy , Alopecia/radiotherapy , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Male , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Finasteride/administration & dosage , Finasteride/therapeutic use , Minoxidil/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation
6.
J Oral Pathol Med ; 52(5): 365-371, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691842

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effects of laser therapy on normal cells are well known and accepted, but the impact of this therapy on malignant cells are not yet fully understood. This review aims to map and outline what the scientific literature addresses on the effects of laser therapy on malignant cells. METHODS: This review article followed the guidelines of the PRISMA-ScR protocol, being all the search, analysis, and selection of articles based on it. RESULTS: After all application of the predetermined criteria, five studies were included, dated between the years 2013 and 2021. With the complete reading of the selected studies, 100% of the articles were classified as category III of the Agency for Healthcare as Research and Quality classification. Similar themes among the papers included were investigated and compared. In these five studies, the visible red and near infrared wavelengths were used, and energy densities varied between 1 and 5 J/cm2 . It was observed that low-level laser could alter the expression of cell proliferation and migration proteins, such as cyclin D1, E-cadherin, and ß-catenin. In addition, changes related to increased cell viability and metabolism were also identified. CONCLUSION: The low-level laser seems to positively regulate the proliferative, migratory, and viability capacity of neoplastic cells, depending on the protocol used. All these studies included in the review are equivalent to in vitro studies; the cells are not in such a complex environment as is an organized tissue, making it necessary to carry out more complex tests, such as in vivo research.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Lasers , Cells, Cultured , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(12): 645, 2023 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853254

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in the treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing in the electronic databases: LILACS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and CINAHL and in http://clinicaltrials.gov . Eligibility criteria were randomized, non-randomized, and observational studies that used photobiomodulation for the treatment of oral mucositis. The endpoints were reduction in the severity of oral mucositis, duration of lesions, and pain reduction. For data analysis, the Review Manager 5.4 program was used. RESULTS: A total of 316 studies were identified, 297 in the electronic databases and 19 in http://clinicaltrials.gov . After removing duplicates, 260 studies were selected for title and abstract reading, of which 223 were excluded. A total of 37 studies were chosen for full reading, of which 6 were included in the review, totaling 299 patients. The treatment used was photobiomodulation. The patients were divided into two groups: the laser group used only photobiomodulation or associated with other therapies, and the control group did not use photobiomodulation. For the endpoint reduction in the severity of oral mucositis (OM), the chance of reduction of the OM was greater in the laser group as compared to the control group. For the endpoints duration of OM lesions and pain reduction, it was not possible to carry out a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity between studies. In the interpretation of the meta-analysis, the reduction in the severity of oral mucositis was greater in the group that received photobiomodulation. CONCLUSION: Photobiomodulation was effective in the treatment of oral mucositis.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Low-Level Light Therapy , Oral Ulcer , Stomatitis , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Pain/etiology
8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD010887, 2023 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37339352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deviation from a normal bite can be defined as malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment takes 20 months on average to correct malocclusion. Accelerating the rate of tooth movement may help to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment and associated unwanted effects including orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR), demineralisation and reduced patient motivation and compliance. Several non-surgical adjuncts have been advocated with the aim of accelerating the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM).         OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of non-surgical adjunctive interventions on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and the overall duration of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: An information specialist searched five bibliographic databases up to 6 September 2022 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people receiving orthodontic treatment using fixed or removable appliances along with non-surgical adjunctive interventions to accelerate tooth movement. We excluded split-mouth studies and studies that involved people who were treated with orthognathic surgery, or who had cleft lip or palate, or other craniofacial syndromes or deformities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors were responsible for study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction; they carried out these tasks independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion amongst the review team to reach consensus.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 studies, none of which were rated as low risk of bias overall. We categorised the included studies as testing light vibrational forces or photobiomodulation, the latter including low level laser therapy and light emitting diode. The studies assessed non-surgical interventions added to fixed or removable orthodontic appliances compared to treatment without the adjunct. A total of 1027 participants (children and adults) were recruited with loss to follow-up ranging from 0% to 27% of the original samples.  Certainty of the evidence For all comparisons and outcomes presented below, the certainty of the evidence is low to very low. Light vibrational forces  Eleven studies assessed how applying light vibrational forces (LVF) affected orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). There was no evidence of a difference between the intervention and control groups for duration of orthodontic treatment (MD -0.61 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.44 to 1.22; 2 studies, 77 participants); total number of orthodontic appliance adjustment visits (MD -0.32 visits, 95% CI -1.69 to 1.05; 2 studies, 77 participants); orthodontic tooth movement during the early alignment stage (reduction of lower incisor irregularity (LII)) at 4-6 weeks (MD 0.12 mm, 95% CI -1.77 to 2.01; 3 studies, 144 participants), or 10-16 weeks (MD -0.18 mm, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.83; 4 studies, 175 participants); rate of canine distalisation (MD -0.01 mm/month, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.18; 2 studies, 40 participants); or rate of OTM during en masse space closure (MD 0.10 mm per month, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.29; 2 studies, 81 participants). No evidence of a difference was found between LVF and control groups in rate of OTM when using removable orthodontic aligners. Nor did the studies show evidence of a difference between groups for our secondary outcomes, including patient perception of pain, patient-reported need for analgesics at different stages of treatment and harms or side effects.  Photobiomodulation Ten studies assessed the effect of applying low level laser therapy (LLLT) on rate of OTM. We found that participants in the LLLT group had a statistically significantly shorter length of time for the teeth to align in the early stages of treatment (MD -50 days, 95% CI -58 to -42; 2 studies, 62 participants) and required fewer appointments (-2.3, 95% CI -2.5 to -2.0; 2 studies, 125 participants). There was no evidence of a difference between the LLLT and control groups in OTM when assessed as percentage reduction in LII in the first month of alignment (1.63%, 95% CI -2.60 to 5.86; 2 studies, 56 participants) or in the second month (percentage reduction MD 3.75%, 95% CI -1.74 to 9.24; 2 studies, 56 participants). However, LLLT resulted in an increase in OTM during the space closure stage in the maxillary arch (MD 0.18 mm/month, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33; 1 study; 65 participants; very low level of certainty) and the mandibular arch (right side MD 0.16 mm/month, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.19; 1 study; 65 participants). In addition, LLLT resulted in an increased  rate of OTM during maxillary canine retraction (MD 0.01 mm/month, 95% CI 0 to 0.02; 1 study, 37 participants). These  findings were not clinically significant. The studies showed no evidence of a difference between groups for our secondary outcomes, including OIIRR, periodontal health and patient perception of pain at early stages of treatment. Two studies assessed the influence of applying light-emitting diode (LED) on OTM. Participants in the LED group required a significantly shorter time to align the mandibular arch compared to the control group (MD -24.50 days, 95% CI -42.45 to -6.55, 1 study, 34 participants). There is no evidence that LED application increased the rate of OTM during maxillary canine retraction (MD 0.01 mm/month, 95% CI 0 to 0.02; P = 0.28; 1 study, 39 participants ). In terms of secondary outcomes, one study assessed patient perception of pain and found no evidence of a difference between groups.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions to accelerate orthodontic treatment is of low to very low certainty. It suggests that there is no additional benefit of light vibrational forces or photobiomodulation for reducing the duration of orthodontic treatment. Although there may be a limited benefit from photobiomodulation application for accelerating discrete treatment phases, these results have to be interpreted with caution due to their questionable clinical significance. Further well-designed, rigorous RCTs with longer follow-up periods spanning from start to completion of orthodontic treatment are required to determine whether non-surgical interventions may reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment by a clinically significant amount, with minimal adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Malocclusion , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/etiology , Dental Care , Pain/etiology , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects
9.
Skin Res Technol ; 29(3): e13298, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36973977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of laser treatments for acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules (ABNOM) varies among studies, and few studies have evaluated the factors affecting therapeutic effects. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (QSNYL) therapy for ABNOM and to identify the factors influencing the outcome. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with ABNOM were retrospectively evaluated and received two-to-nine treatment sessions. The effects of different factors on the therapeutic effect were analyzed on the basis of the number of treatments, age at first treatment, skin type, lesion color, affected area, number of lesion sites, and presence of concomitant melasma. RESULTS: The curative effect was positively correlated with the treatment time and negatively correlated with the increasing age at first treatment (p < 0.05). The curative effect was better in patients with skin type III than those with type IV ( p < 0.05) and in patients with a lesion area of less than 10 cm2 than those with a larger affected area (p < 0.05). Additionally, the treatment effect was poorer in patients with concomitant melasma (p < 0.05). The treatment effect was not significantly correlated with the lesion color or number of affected sites (p > 0.05). Eleven patients (10%) developed postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). CONCLUSIONS: Early and repeated QSNYL therapy achieved satisfactory results for ABNOM. The risk of PIH after laser treatment is highest among patients with older age, darker lesion color, and darker skin color. For patients with ABNOM with concurrent melasma, low-energy laser therapy is recommended to reduce the risk of melasma aggravation.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State , Low-Level Light Therapy , Nevus of Ota , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Melanosis/radiotherapy , Melanosis/surgery , Nevus of Ota/radiotherapy , Nevus of Ota/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods
10.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(1): 36-41, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36533794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low-fluence, multisession therapy of Nd:YAG laser has been widely used for treating melasma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-fluence Nd:YAG laser toning for melasma using a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched till December 2020. A total of 50 studies (1,772 patients) and 66 studies were selected for the evaluation of the efficacy and complications, retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean Melasma Area and Severity Index/modified Melasma Area and Severity Index scores for laser toning as monotherapy at <4, 4 to <8, 8 to <12, 12 to <24, and ≥24 weeks after treatment compared with that at pretreatment were -0.51, -0.91, -0.97, -0.92, 0.01 SD, whereas those as combination therapy were -1.64, -1.26, -0.94, not available, -1.45 SD, respectively. An increase in light value and a decrease in relative lightness index have remained up to 8 weeks after laser toning. Complications including hypopigmentation/leukoderma, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, and recurrence were noted. The incidence of hypopigmentation/leukoderma correlated with the number of laser sessions (p = .036). CONCLUSION: Low-fluence Nd:YAG laser toning as combination therapy has shown better efficacy than monotherapy and the efficacy seems to diminish with time. This study suggests the positive correlation of hypopigmentation/leukoderma with the number of laser sessions.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Melanosis , Humans , Hypopigmentation , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Melanosis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
11.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(7): 689-692, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients frequently seek treatment for vascular and pigmented lesions. More recently, a novel, variable-sequenced, long-pulsed, 532-nm and 1,064-nm laser with cryogen spray cooling was developed to offer greater flexibility in treatments. OBJECTIVE: A prospective clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel, variable-sequenced, long-pulsed, 532-nm and 1,064-nm laser with cryogen spray cooling (DermaV, Lutronic, South Korea). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with vascular and/or pigmented lesions were enrolled and underwent laser treatments. RESULTS: Twenty-three subjects were enrolled with vascular lesions (39.1%), pigmented lesions (17.4%), and both (43.5%). Mean age was 53.1 years, and 91.3% were women. Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV were included. All subjects were treated with 532 nm, and 4 were also treated with 1,064 nm. According to 4 blinded physician reviewers, correct before and after photographs were selected in 94.7%, 92.1%, 84.2%, and 76.3% of cases. Overall, 86.8% were responders, meaning that at least 3 of 4 reviewers agreed. For Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, improvement occurred in 81.6%, 81.6%, 81.6%, and 76.3% of cases. No serious adverse events occurred. Overall, 87.0% of subjects reported being very satisfied or satisfied. CONCLUSION: A novel, variable-sequenced, long-pulsed, 532-nm and 1,064-nm laser with cryogen spray cooling can safely and effectively improve vascular and pigmented lesions.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Prospective Studies , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Lasers , Republic of Korea
12.
J Cosmet Laser Ther ; 25(1-4): 45-53, 2023 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748714

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cellulite of the upper lateral and posterior thighs and lower buttocks represents a common unwanted condition. OBJECTIVES: The author sought to comparea LLLT-LED bed therapy and a novel topical anti-cellulite gel on one thigh/buttock cellulite vs light therapy for cellulite to the opposite side. METHODS: Eight healthy female subjects were randomly treated with a LLLT-LED bed twice weekly for 20 minutes in prone/supine positions with twice daily application of a novel anti-cellulite gel to one randomized thigh/buttock. RESULTS: At the end of the 3-month trial, skin elasticity increased after combined therapy on one thigh but decreased with only LLLT-LED bed treatments on the opposite thigh. Thighs treated with active gel and LLLT-LED bed, were downgraded to a lower cellulite grade, while monotherapy did not demonstrate any change from their baseline cellulite grading. Changes in thigh circumference did not correlate with either treatments regimens.Subject and investigator questionnaire evaluations at month-3 were assessed as "satisfactory" results. There were no adverse reactions to treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LLLT-LED bed therapy and an anti-cellulite gel demonstrated an efficient alternative in the treatment of cellulite-involved thighs/buttocks over similarly affected thighs/buttocks that were treated only with LLLT-LED bed therapy.


Subject(s)
Cellulite , Cosmetic Techniques , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Female , Thigh , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Buttocks , Adipose Tissue , Ethics Committees, Research , Cellulite/therapy
13.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 14, 2023 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135711

ABSTRACT

Facial filling is widespread in society, albeit associated with inherent risks. This review analyzes clinical studies using laser therapy for filler complications to assess its safety and efficacy as an alternative treatment. A literature search was conducted up until April 2023, encompassing five different databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline, to find clinical trials addressing patients who underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial filling. The outcome variables were the clinical assessment of the lesion and the occurrence of post-intervention complications/sequelae. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. In total, six studies were included, all classified as having a "moderate risk" of bias. A total of 533 patients underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers. The diode laser was the most frequently utilized equipment, with positive results reported in five studies. Among all treated patients, 96.24% achieved partial or complete resolution, 0.22% experienced some sequelae or complications, and only 0.01% showed no improvement. Laser treatment can eliminate the necessity for surgical intervention for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers, resulting in partial or complete improvement of the condition.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Laser Therapy/methods , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Lasers
14.
Ann Plast Surg ; 91(6): 758-762, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856194

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by painful and foul-smelling cystic nodules and sinus tracts in the apocrine gland-bearing regions. The treatment options include topical, intralesional, systemic, and surgical modalities. Currently, the most novel therapy is laser therapy to provide localized treatment without systemic adverse effects. However, data regarding patient outcomes after laser treatment are limited because of the low prevalence of this disease. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laser therapy as a treatment modality for patients with HS. METHODS: A retrospective review cohort analysis of patients with HS undergoing laser treatment between 2016 and 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics, lesion location(s), Hurley stage, age of onset and diagnosis, treatment length, type, outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients met the inclusion criteria; on average, patients were treated with 5.8 laser sessions for 14.8 months with no complications and minor blood loss. Hidradenitis suppurativa progression commonly starts during puberty, with a median onset of 13.8 years and diagnosis of HS at 16.2 years. All patients (n = 94) showed an improvement in HS disease severity: 59.6% completed treatment, 12.0% are currently undergoing treatment, and 26.0% were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapy is an effective and safe therapy for HS leading to improved quality of life and should be considered in the treatment and management of HS.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index
15.
Am J Dent ; 36(1): 21-24, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36917711

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a retrospective practice-based clinical study, the effects of additional laser therapy on side effects following the removal of all four impacted third molars. The secondary objective was, based on those results, to rationalize a protocol for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in terms of irradiation settings. METHODS: 96 subjects requiring simultaneous surgical removal of the four third molars were treated from 2017 to 2019. For each subject, one side was randomly assigned to laser treatment, the other receiving the placebo. LLLT was performed by applying an infrared diode laser of 810 nm. In the LLLT irradiated side of the mouth, three groups were randomly assigned to a specific protocol of irradiation. Controllable settings include power, energy density and also scanning technique. The main outcome was pain, registered on a visual analog scale (VAS) performed by the patients. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference for one of the tested protocols. Self-reported annoyance and pain scores were lower for the side submitted to a 30-second laser radiation at a power of 0.3 W with the slow scanning technique (P< 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present treatment approach, using a one-time low-level laser therapy intra-oral application, showed a beneficial effect of LLLT reducing pain after third molar surgery, which should be confirmed through further study.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods
16.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 937, 2022 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a frequent issue that arises after mastectomy surgery in women and compromises physical and mental function. Previously published studies have shown positive effects with the use of Low-level laser therapy in another term Photo-biomodulation therapy (PBM). This research investigated the efficacy of clinical use of LLLT (PBM) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched for LLLT clinical trials published before October 2021. The methodological quality of randomized trials and the effectiveness of Laser Therapy for BCRL were evaluated. The primary objectives were arm circumference or arm volume, whereas the secondary goals were to assess shoulder mobility and pain severity. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials were analyzed in total. Typically, the included RCTs had good research quality. At four weeks, there was a considerable reduction in arm circumference/volume, and this continued with long-term follow-up. However, no statistically significant change in shoulder mobility or pain severity was seen between the laser and placebo groups at 0-, 1-, 2-, and 3-month short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this comprehensive study demonstrated that LLLT (PBM) was successful in diminishing arm circumference and volume than improving shoulder mobility and pain. Data indicates that laser therapy (PBM) may be a beneficial treatment option for females with PML. Because of the scarcity of evidence, there is a strong need for well-conducted and longer-duration trials in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Details of the protocol for this systematic review were registered on PROSPERO and can be accessed at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42022315076 .


Subject(s)
Breast Cancer Lymphedema , Breast Neoplasms , Low-Level Light Therapy , Lymphedema , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Lymphedema/etiology , Mastectomy/adverse effects
17.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(5): e15406, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199898

ABSTRACT

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign vascular tumor that occurs in infants and young children. Studies have shown laser therapy to reduce the proliferation of superficial IH and promote its regression, but the optimal timing for treatment has not been determined. Our study explores the timing and safety of 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment for early superficial IH. We retrospectively analyzed 180 cases of superficial IH treated with 595-nm PDL. Data was organized according to patient age at the first visit. Six months after the initial treatment, patients were evaluated using a grade IV classification method, and the clinical curative effect of each group was calculated. The number of laser treatments and the occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded simultaneously. The overall effective and cure rates were 98.3% and 84.4%, respectively, with no significant difference in rates between groups (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of laser treatments among the age groups (p < 0.05). The average laser frequency: "0-2 months group" < "2-4 months group" < "4-6 months group." The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 11.1%, and 12 (6.7%) cases had short-term adverse reactions, with no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Eight cases had long-term adverse reactions. This difference between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Younger children (≤2 months of age) receiving 595-nm PDL treatment for IH require relatively fewer treatment times than other children (>2 months of age), have a shorter course of disease, experience better curative effect, and have fewer sequelae reactions.


Subject(s)
Hemangioma , Laser Therapy , Lasers, Dye , Low-Level Light Therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Hemangioma/drug therapy , Humans , Infant , Lasers, Dye/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(7): e15519, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426222

ABSTRACT

Labial lentigines associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome are challenging and represent a cosmetic problem. Laser and intense-pulsed light sources (IPLS) can be used to treat these macules. However, there are few guidelines regarding the different types of protocols found in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to review the pertinent literature on lasers and IPLS as therapy for labial lentigines in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. A detailed literature search was conducted in seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science) to November 2020. Data were extracted and analyzed from selected studies including study design, sample size, participants' skin color, age, and gender, parameters of the laser or IPLS used, interval and total sessions of laser application, results obtained, follow-up time and side effects. Thirteen out of 124 published studies met our eligibility criteria, covering 81 patients. Ten types of lasers and IPLS were used, and most of the sample (n = 57) was treated with Q-switch Alexandrite Laser (QSAL). The total number of sessions ranged from 1 to 12 and the interval between sessions ranged from 2 to 16 weeks. All studies have shown satisfactory results, with no further complications. The follow-up ranged from 2 to 97 months. Laser therapy and IPLS are effective in the treatment of lentigines associated with PJS. Although QSAL was used in 70.3% of the sample, different types of lasers showed comparable satisfactory results.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lentigo , Lip Diseases , Low-Level Light Therapy , Melanosis , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome , Humans , Lentigo/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/complications , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/diagnosis , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/radiotherapy
19.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(12): 3573-3580, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35389054

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition that remains challenging to treat. We hypothesized that skin-adhesive low-level light therapy (LLLT) would be an effective treatment for OAB caused by bladder muscle contraction. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an LLLT device for the treatment of OAB. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial included patients with a clinical diagnosis of OAB who were treated at either of two university hospitals. Patients were instructed to apply an LLLT device (Color DNA-WSF) or a sham device at home three times daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the mean daily number of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes between baseline and 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were the mean changes in incontinence, voiding, and nocturia episodes from baseline and the likelihood of achieving a > 50% reduction in UUI and incontinence episodes after 12 weeks. All patients completed the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), and Impact Urinary Incontinence-7 (IIQ-7) questionnaires. Safety parameters included treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Compared with those in the sham group, the numbers of UUI and urinary incontinence episodes in the LLLT group were significantly decreased at week 12 (UUI, (-1.0 ± 1.7 vs. -0.4 ± 2.5, P = 0.003; urinary incontinence, -1.1 ± 1.9 vs. -0.5 ± 2.9, P=0.002). Furthermore, the OABSS, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 scores at week 12 tended to be better in the LLLT group than in the sham group. The incidence of device-related treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: LLLT may be clinically useful and safe for the treatment of OAB.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Urinary Bladder, Overactive , Humans , Adhesives , Double-Blind Method , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/therapy , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence, Urge/epidemiology , Skin
20.
Lasers Surg Med ; 54(2): 237-244, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255869

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of topical carbon plus short-pulsed and Q-switched Nd-YAG laser to fractional carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser in improving the appearance of wide facial pores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Egyptian patients with wide facial pores were treated in a split-face manner with two sessions of fractional CO2 laser on one side of the face and topical carbon followed by short-pulsed and Q-switched Nd-YAG laser on the other side at 4-week intervals. Clinical evaluation by Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), patient satisfaction level, and photography before treatment and 1 month after the second laser session was performed and adverse effects were monitored. Dermoscopic evaluation by dermoscopy pore score and optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation by surface irregularities score were performed at baseline and 1-month posttreatment. RESULTS: One month after treatment, both modalities produced significant reduction in IGA score, dermoscopy pore score, and surface irregularities by OCT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Both procedures were well-tolerated. There was no significant difference in IGA, dermoscopy pore score, surface irregularities score by OCT, adverse effects or patient satisfaction level between both treated sides. CONCLUSION: Fractional CO2 laser and topical carbon application followed by short-pulsed and Q-switched Nd-YAG laser can be safely and effectively used to improve the appearance of wide facial pores.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Gas , Lasers, Solid-State , Low-Level Light Therapy , Carbon Dioxide , Humans , Lasers, Gas/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL