Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Limited level 1 evidence is available on the omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in older women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. METHODS: We performed a phase 3 randomized trial of the omission of irradiation; the trial population included women 65 years of age or older who had hormone receptor-positive, node-negative, T1 or T2 primary breast cancer (with tumors ≤3 cm in the largest dimension) treated with breast-conserving surgery with clear excision margins and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive whole-breast irradiation (40 to 50 Gy) or no irradiation. The primary end point was local breast cancer recurrence. Regional recurrence, breast cancer-specific survival, distant recurrence as the first event, and overall survival were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1326 women were enrolled; 658 were randomly assigned to receive whole-breast irradiation and 668 to receive no irradiation. The median follow-up was 9.1 years. The cumulative incidence of local breast cancer recurrence within 10 years was 9.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8 to 12.3) in the no-radiotherapy group and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.1 to 1.7) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio, 10.4; 95% CI, 4.1 to 26.1; P<0.001). Although local recurrence was more common in the group that did not receive radiotherapy, the 10-year incidence of distant recurrence as the first event was not higher in the no-radiotherapy group than in the radiotherapy group, at 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.8) and 3.0% (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.5), respectively. Overall survival at 10 years was almost identical in the two groups, at 80.8% (95% CI, 77.2 to 84.3) with no radiotherapy and 80.7% (95% CI, 76.9 to 84.3) with radiotherapy. The incidence of regional recurrence and breast cancer-specific survival also did not differ substantially between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of radiotherapy was associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence but had no detrimental effect on distant recurrence as the first event or overall survival among women 65 years of age or older with low-risk, hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. (Funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government and the Breast Cancer Institute, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN95889329.).

The role of surgical tissue injury and intraoperative sympathetic activation in postoperative immunosuppression after breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the second most common cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Counterintuitively, large population-based retrospective trials report better survival after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy, corrected for tumour- and patient variables. More extensive surgical tissue injury and activation of the sympathetic nervous system by nociceptive stimuli are associated with immune suppression. We hypothesized that mastectomy causes a higher expression of plasma damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and more intraoperative sympathetic activation which induce postoperative immune dysregulation. Immune suppression can lead to postoperative complications and affect tumour-free survival. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, plasma DAMPs (HMGB1, HSP70, S100A8/A9 and S100A12), intraoperative sympathetic activation (Nociception Level (NOL) index from 0 to 100), and postoperative immune function (plasma cytokine concentrations and ex vivo cytokine production capacity) were compared in patients undergoing elective BCS (n = 20) versus mastectomy (n = 20). RESULTS: Ex vivo cytokine production capacity of TNF, IL-6 and IL-1ß was nearly absent in both groups one hour after surgery. Levels appeared recovered on postoperative day 3 (POD3), with significantly higher ex vivo production capacity of IL-1ß after BCS (p = .041) compared to mastectomy. Plasma concentration of IL-6 was higher one hour after mastectomy (p = .045). Concentrations of plasma alarmins S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were significantly higher on POD3 after mastectomy (p = .003 and p = .041, respectively). Regression analysis showed a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 (absence of nociception) during mastectomy when corrected for norepinephrine equivalents (36% versus 45% respectively, p = .038). Percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 of all patients correlated with ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1ß and TNF on POD3 (r = .408; p = .011 and r = .500; p = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study revealed substantial early postoperative immune suppression after BCS and mastectomy that appears to recover in the following days. Differences between BCS and mastectomy in release of DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation could affect postoperative immune homeostasis and thereby contribute to the better survival reported after BCS in previous large population-based retrospective trials. These results endorse further exploration of (1) S100 alarmins as potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer surgery and (2) suppression of intraoperative sympathetic activation to substantiate the observed association with postoperative immune dysregulation.

Residual cancer burden in two-stage nipple sparing mastectomy after first stage lumpectomy and devascularization of the nipple areolar complex.

PURPOSE: Ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) can be ameliorated by 2-stage procedures wherein devascularization of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and lumpectomy with or without nodal staging surgery is performed first (1S), weeks prior to a completion NSM (2S). We report the time interval between procedures in relation to the presence of residual carcinoma at 2S NSM. METHODS: Women with breast cancer who received 2S NSM from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Both patient level and breast level analyses were conducted. Clinical staging at presentation, pathologic staging at 1S and residual disease at 2S pathology are noted. Residual disease was classified as microscopic (1-2 mm), minimal (3-10 mm), and moderate (> 10 mm). RESULTS: 59 patients (108 breasts) underwent 2S NSM. The median time interval between 1 and 2S for all patients was 34 days: 31 days for upfront surgery invasive cancer, 41 days for upfront DCIS surgery and 31 days for those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Completion NSM was performed within 6 weeks for 72% of the breasts analyzed. Of the 53 breasts with invasive cancer on 1S pathology, 35% (19/53) had no residual invasive disease and 24.5% (13/53) had neither residual invasive nor in situ carcinoma on final 2S. Among the 50 women who had upfront surgery, 16 (32%) had residual invasive cancer found at 2S NSM, 9 of which had less than or equal to 1 cm disease. CONCLUSION: Invasive cancers were completely resected during 1S procedure in 65% of breasts. Residual disease was minimal and there was only one case of upstaging at 2S. Added time of two-stage surgery is offset by a reduction in ischemic mastectomy flap complications.

Breast lymphedema following breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

PURPOSE: To examine the current evidence on breast lymphedema (BL) diagnosis and treatment after breast-conserving surgery, identify gaps in the literature, and propose future research directions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane, including studies published between 2000 and 2023. References were reviewed manually for eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who underwent breast conserving treatment (surgery ± radiation) for breast cancer, goals of the paper included analyzing or reviewing BL measurement with ultrasound or tissue dielectric constant, or BL treatment. Twenty-seven manuscripts were included in the review. RESULTS: There is variation in incidence, time course, and risk factors for BL. Risk factors for BL included breast size, primary and axillary surgery extent, radiation, and chemotherapy but require further investigation. Diagnostic methods for BL currently rely on patient report and lack standardized criteria. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and ultrasound (US) emerged as promising ambulatory BL assessment tools; however, diagnostic thresholds and validation studies with ICG lymphography are needed to establish clinical utility. The evidence base for treatment of BL is weak, lacking high-quality studies. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BL is not well defined. TDC and US show promise as ambulatory assessment tools for BL; however, further validation with lymphatic imaging is required. BL treatment is not established in the literature. Longitudinal, prospective studies including pre-radiation measurements and validating with lymphatic imaging are required. These data will inform screening, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment parameters for patients with BL after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Prevention of Seroma Formation and Its Sequelae After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review and Guideline for Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Seroma formation after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains a troublesome complication with significant morbidity. Numerous studies have tried to identify techniques to prevent seroma formation. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to use available literature to identify the best intervention for prevention of seroma after standalone ALND. METHODS: A literature search was performed for all comparative articles regarding seroma formation in patients undergoing a standalone ALND or ALND with breast-conserving surgery in the last 25 years. Data regarding seroma formation, clinically significant seroma (CSS), surgical site infections (SSI), and hematomas were collected. The network meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and the level of inconsistency was evaluated using the Bucher method. RESULTS: A total of 19 articles with 1962 patients were included. Ten different techniques to prevent seroma formation were described. When combining direct and indirect comparisons, axillary drainage until output is less than 50 ml per 24 h for two consecutive days results in significantly less CSS. The use of energy sealing devices, padding, tissue glue, or patches did not significantly reduce the incidence of CSS. When comparing the different techniques with regard to SSIs, no statistically significant differences were seen. CONCLUSIONS: To prevent CSS after ALND, axillary drainage is the most valuable and scientifically proven measure. On the basis of the results of this systematic review with network meta-analysis, removing the drain when output is < 50 ml per 24 h for two consecutive days irrespective of duration seems best. Since drainage policies vary widely, an evidence-based guideline is needed.

Haemoblock hemostatic substance in reducing seroma formation post axillary lymph node dissection following breast conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer management, necessitates a nuanced understanding of complications that may impede treatment progression. This study scrutinize the impact of Haemoblock hemostatic solution, evaluation it's potential in reducing seroma complication by controlling lymph flow and obliterating axillary dead space. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 58 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and ALND, stratified into two groups: Group A (ALND + Haemoblock, n = 29) and Group B (ALND + placebo, n = 29). Postoperative drainage charts were monitored, with the primary endpoint being the time to drain removal, Additionally, patients were observed for surgical site infection (SSI). RESULTS: Group A exhibited a marginally higher mean total drain output (398 +/- 205 vs. 326 +/- 198) compared to Group B, this difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.176). Equally, the mean time to drain removal demonstrated no discernible distinction between the two groups (6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0, Group A vs. Group B, p = 0.526). During follow up, nine patients in Group A required seroma aspiration (mean aspiration 31 +/- 73) as compared to Group B, 6 patients required aspiration (mean aspiration 12 +/- 36), p = 0.222). No notable disparity in SSI rates between the groups was identified. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the administration of Haemoblock did not manifest a discernible effect in mitigating seroma production, hastening drain removal, or influencing SSI rates following ALND. The study underscores the intricate and multifactorial nature of seroma formation, suggesting avenues for future research to explore combined interventions and protracted follow-up periods for a more comprehensive understanding.

Postoperative bleeding complications in breast conserving surgery and the role of antithrombotic medications: retrospective analysis of 4712 operations.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the risk and timing of postoperative bleeding complications following breast-conserving surgery (BCS), with or without axillary surgery, especially in relation to perioperative management of antithrombotic medications. METHODS: Data from all patients who underwent BCS for breast cancer between 2010 and 2022 at a single university hospital were collected. Medical records were reviewed for reoperations, unplanned admissions, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 4712 breast-conserving surgeries and 3631 axillary surgeries were performed on 3838 patients. The risk of any bleeding complication was 1.1% (40/3571) in breast-conserving surgery, 0.3% (9/2847) in sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 0.5% (4/779) in axillary lymph node dissection. Upon arrival for treatment, 645 (17%) patients were taking antithrombotic medications. The risk of bleeding complications was not elevated in patients whose medication was discontinued at least a day before the surgery (OR 0.84, p = 0.76); but it was almost four-fold (OR 3.61, p = 0.026) in patients whose antithrombotic medication was continued. However, the absolute risk for bleeding complication was low in these patients as well (2.0%, 15/751). The majority of bleeding complications (85%, 47/55) occurred within 24 h after the surgery. CONCLUSION: The risk for bleeding complications was elevated, but still low, after BCS with or without axillary surgery, when antithrombotic medications were continued through the surgical period. Discontinuing antithrombotic medications is not obligatory in these patients.

Patient-reported Outcomes Utilizing the BREAST-Q Questionnaire After Breast-Conserving Surgery With and Without Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) arose to decrease the deformity following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. In this meta-analysis (MA), we pool BREAST-Q questionnaire data to compare quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients who received BCS alone or in combination with level I or II oncoplastic breast surgery (BCS + OBS). All relevant databases were searched following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All prospective or retrospective studies with a BCS or BCS + OBS cohort that reported QOL as assessed with the BREAST-Q questionnaire were eligible. Fifty-five studies (75 distinct patient cohorts; 11,186 patients) were included in the MA, with 12 studies reporting both preoperative and postoperative values and eligible for a pair-wise MA. The pair-wise MA showed a significant postoperative improvement in the overall satisfaction with the breast (mean difference [MD] +8.0%, P = .003) and in the psychosocial well-being (MD +9.2%, 3.5-14.8, P = .001) of the entire cohort (BCS and BCS + OBS). A subgroup MA of proportions highlighted a superiority of BCS + OBS to BCS in overall satisfaction with the breast (72.0%, 68.0-76.1, vs 62.9%, 58.3-67.5; P = .02) and psychosocial well-being (78.9%, 71.5-86.4, vs 73.3%, 67.3-76.5, P = .0001). A leave-1-out sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of the pair-wise MA and the MA of proportions. Oncoplastic breast surgery effectively improves QOL and patient satisfaction based on the patient-reported outcomes assessed with the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The improvements were associated with acceptable complication rates, further supporting BCS followed by OBS when mastectomy would otherwise be necessary.

The Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Immediate Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction With Contralateral Breast Adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic surgery is an expanding approach for managing breast conservation because it offers improved cosmetic outcomes while maintaining oncological safety. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the oncological and surgical outcomes of patients who underwent oncoplastic procedures at a single institution. METHODS: The study population includes all consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy followed by immediate oncoplastic breast reconstruction with contralateral breast adjustment between 2010 and 2021. Following IRB approval, patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical details, complications, and follow-up were evaluated for this group. Quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: Following multidisciplinary tumor board discussion, 77 patients (82 breasts) underwent oncoplastic surgery. Of these, 92.2% underwent breast MRI prior to surgery with mean mass enhancement of 2.35 cm (range, 0-8.5 cm) and non-mass enhancement of 5.77 cm (range, 0-14 cm), and 44% presented with multifocal disease. The final positive surgical margin rate was 2.4%, and all conserved breasts received adjuvant radiation therapy. The 5-year local recurrence rate for invasive tumors was 4.1%. QOL scores were generally high, with most patients reporting good to excellent cosmetic outcomes and high personal satisfaction with breast appearance and softness. Physicians reported breast symmetry in 89.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that oncoplastic surgery with contralateral breast adjustment is safe, effective, and an excellent option for breast cancer patients wishing for breast conservation even for large or multifocal masses, with favorable oncologic and cosmetic outcomes. The QOL analysis indicates high patient satisfaction. These results support the use of oncoplastic surgery in the management of breast cancer.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Several randomised, phase 3 trials have investigated the value of different techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery compared with whole-breast irradiation. In a phase 3 randomised trial, we evaluated whether APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy is non-inferior compared with whole-breast irradiation. Here, we present the 10-year follow-up results. METHODS: We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 16 hospitals and medical centres in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 40 years or older with early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either whole-breast irradiation or APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy. Whole-breast irradiation was delivered in 25 daily fractions of 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with a supplemental boost of 10 Gy to the tumour bed, and APBI was delivered as 30·1 Gy (seven fractions) and 32·0 Gy (eight fractions) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in 5 days or as 50 Gy of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy over 5 treatment days. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral local recurrence, analysed in the as-treated population; the non-inferiority margin for the recurrence rate difference (defined for 5-year results) was 3 percentage points. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00402519; the trial is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, 1328 female patients were randomly assigned to whole breast irradiation (n=673) or APBI (n=655), of whom 551 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 633 in the APBI group were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 10·36 years (IQR 9·12-11·28), the 10-year local recurrence rates were 1·58% (95% CI 0·37 to 2·8) in the whole-breast irradiation group and 3·51% (1·99 to 5·03) in the APBI group. The difference in 10-year rates between the groups was 1·93% (95% CI -0·018 to 3·87; p=0·074). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 and 2, in 234 (60%) of 393 participants in the whole-breast irradiation group and 314 (67%) of 470 participants in the APBI group, at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both. Patients in the APBI group had a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 late side-effects than those in the whole-breast irradiation group (17 [4%] of 393 for whole-breast irradiation vs seven [1%] of 470 for APBI; p=0·021; at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both). At 10 years, the most common type of grade 3 adverse event in both treatment groups was fibrosis (six [2%] of 313 patients for whole-breast irradiation and three [1%] of 375 patients for APBI, p=0·56). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths have been observed. INTERPRETATION: Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer is a valuable alternative to whole-breast irradiation in terms of treatment efficacy and is associated with fewer late side-effects. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid, Germany.

Immediate or delayed oncoplastic surgery after breast conserving surgery at the Netherlands Cancer Institute: a cohort study of 251 cases.

PURPOSE: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) after breast conserving surgery is preferably performed during the same operation. Offering delayed OPS instead of mastectomy to patients with a high risk of tumor-positive margins allows breast conservation with the option of margin re-excision during OPS, without having to dismantle the reconstruction. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes after immediate and delayed OPS. METHODS: We included early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent OPS at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016 and 2019. Patients were selected for delayed OPS after multidisciplinary consultation if the risk of tumor-positive margins with immediate OPS was considered significant (> 30%). Groups were compared on baseline characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 242 patients with 251 OPS, 130 (52%) OPS had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immediate OPS was performed in 176 (70%) cases and delayed OPS in 76 (30%). Selection for delayed OPS was associated with tumor size (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), ILC (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.10-6.20), DCIS (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.42-8.34) and bra size (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). Delayed and immediate OPS differed in tissue weight (54 vs. 67 g, p = 0.034), tissue replacement (51% vs. 26%, p < .001) and tumor-positive margins (66% vs. 18%, p < .001). Re-excision was performed in 48 (63%) delayed OPS and in 11 (6%) immediate OPS. Groups did not differ in complications (21% vs. 18%, p = 0.333). Breast conservation after immediate and delayed OPS was 98% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Performing delayed OPS in selected cases facilitated simultaneous margin re-excision without increasing complications, and resulted in an excellent breast conservation rate.

Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the delay in initiating adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM) following BCS compared with a matched cohort of patients who did not undergo ORM between BCS and RT. METHODS: Medical records of 112 women (56 ORMs and 56 matched non-ORMs) with carcinoma in situ or early-stage breast cancer treated with BCS were reviewed. ORM was performed in a delayed manner following BCS, allowing confirmation of negative surgical margins. Time to RT was defined as time from last oncologic surgery to start of RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 6.8 years for the ORM cohort and 6.7 years for the control non-ORM cohort. Patients who underwent ORM following BCS experienced a significant delay in initiating RT (>8 weeks) than matched patients not undergoing ORM (66% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Wound complications occurred in 44.6% (n = 25) of patients in the ORM cohort, which were mostly minor, including delayed wound healing and/or infection (39%). There was no significant difference in local recurrence between patients in the non-ORM and ORM cohorts (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ORM following BCS has the potential to delay RT >8 weeks, largely as a result of increased risk of wound complications; however, this delay did not impact local control. ORM can be safely considered for appropriately selected patients with breast cancer.

Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.

Trends of Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The ACOSOG-Z0011- and the AMAROS-trial obviated the need for axillary surgery in most sentinel node-positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Data for patients who undergo mastectomy is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate patterns of axillary treatment in SLN+ patients treated by mastectomy in the years after the publication of landmark studies regarding axillary treatment in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing BCS. METHODS: This was a population-based study in cT1-3N0M0 breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy and staged as SLN+ between 2009 and 2018. The performance of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or administration of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) were primary outcomes and were studied over time. RESULTS: The study included 10,633 patients. The frequency of ALND performance decreased from 78% in 2009 to 10% in 2018, whereas PMRT increased from 4 to 49% (P < 0.001). In ≥N1a patients, ALND performance decreased from 93 to 20%, whereas PMRT increased to 70% (P < 0.001). In N1mi and N0itc patients, ALND was abandoned during the study period, whereas PMRT increased to 38% and 13% respectively (P < 0.001), respectively. Age, tumor subtype, N-stage, and hospital type affected the likelihood that patients underwent ALND. CONCLUSIONS: In this study in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, use of ALND decreased drastically over time. By the end of 2018 most ≥N1a patients received PMRT as the only adjuvant axillary treatment, whereas the majority of N1mi and N0itc patients received no additional treatment.

Medical and surgical postoperative complications after breast conservation versus mastectomy in older women with breast cancer: Swedish population-based register study of 34 139 women.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy rates in breast cancer are higher in older patients. The aim was to compare postoperative complication rates after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to mastectomy in women aged 70-79 and older than 80 years versus those aged 50-69 years, and to evaluate survival effects. METHODS: This population-based cohort included women aged 50 years and older with invasive breast cancer T1-3 N0-3 M0 operated on in Sweden 2008-2017. Major surgical and medical 30-day postoperative complications were assessed in adjusted logistic regression models. Overall survival was assessed in Cox models adjusted for clinical confounders, socio-economics, and comorbidity. RESULTS: Of 34 139 women, 8372 (24.5 per cent) were aged 70-79 years, 3928 (11.5 per cent) were 80 years of age or older, and 21 839 (64.0 per cent) were aged 50-69 years. Major surgical postoperative complications did not differ between age groups receiving equivalent surgery (BCS: 2.1 per cent and 2.0 per cent versus 2.1 per cent (P = 0.90); mastectomy: 4.6 per cent and 5.1 per cent versus 4.6 per cent (P = 0.49)). Major medical postoperative complications were higher in women aged >70 years than in women aged 50-69 years (BCS: 1.0 per cent and 2.3 per cent versus 0.4 per cent (P < 0.001); mastectomy: 3.1 per cent and 6.2 per cent versus 1.1 per cent (P < 0.001)), which persisted after adjustments. In women treated by mastectomy, major medical and surgical postoperative complications were associated with worse overall survival in all but the middle age group. CONCLUSION: Mastectomy has higher medical and surgical postoperative complication rates than BCS. Major medical postoperative complications increase significantly with age. Major postoperative complications are associated with worse survival after mastectomy, which should be used with caution in older women.

In breast cancer, either a bit of the breast or the whole breast is removed. Older women more often have their whole breast removed. Such larger surgery may have a higher risk of complications. Complications after surgery can lower the chances of survival. The aim of this project was to find out whether older age comes with more complications after breast surgery. The authors also wanted to know whether this has an effect on survival. This work used information on women aged 50 years and older operated on for breast cancer in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Major surgical and medical complications after breast surgery were compared in three different age groups. In addition, death of any cause was analysed. Of 34 139 women, 8372 were 70­79 years old and 3928 were aged 80 years or older. These older women were compared to 21 839 women who were 50­69 years old. Major surgical complications did not increase with age. However, medical complications were more common in older women. Removing the whole breast gave more complications than removing only part of the breast. In women aged 80 years or older who had their whole breast removed, complications after surgery increased the risk of death. This was true even when considering how severe the cancer was, how it was treated, and also what kind of socio-economic background and afflictions other than breast cancer the women had. Therefore, removal of the whole breast should be done with caution in older women.

Incidence of radiation-associated sarcoma after breast-conserving surgery plus radiation.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated sarcoma (RAS) is a rare sequela of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy modalities for breast conservation and radiation treatment (BCT) have changed over time. We sought to determine if the incidence of RAS after BCT has changed over time. METHODS: We identified breast cancer survivors (diagnosed 1988-2012) treated with BCT within the SEER database. We excluded patients with prior cancer, <1-year follow-up/survival, and nonexternal beam radiation (n = 276 301). We identified patients with a subsequent chest sarcoma diagnosis. The primary predictor variable was a 5-year period of breast cancer diagnosis year (1988-1992, 1993-1997, etc.). The incidence of sarcoma was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring at sarcoma diagnosis, death, or last follow-up (available through December 2017). Given the known latency of RAS, we used Joinpoint analysis to identify the time point at which RAS incidence significantly increased (start of the analytic window). A log-rank test assessed differences in RAS incidence by diagnosis year. RESULTS: The incidence of RAS was 0.03% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.04) and 0.16% at 10 years (95% CI: 0.14-0.18). No statistical difference in RAS incidence by diagnosis year was observed (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: RAS remains a rare but persistent sequela after BCT. As new radiation modalities become more common, ongoing surveillance is necessary to track these rare events.

Large scale experience of two ultrahypofractionated 5 fractions regimes after breast conserving surgery from a single centre.

PURPOSE: Ultra-hypofractionation breast radiotherapy is a safe alternative to moderate hypofractionation. This study reports the results of two ultrahypofractionated regimens used in clinical practice in a high-volume radiotherapy center in terms of efficacy and of tolerance. METHODS: we included all patients treated in an adjuvant setting with five fractions after breast conserving surgery (BCS), for a histologically-confirmed invasive or in situ breast carcinoma. Radiotherapy regimens after BCS were either a 5-week schedule with 5 weekly fractions of 5,7 Gy or a one-week schedule with 5 daily fractions of 5,2 Gy. Adverse events were recorded and local-relapse free survival (LRFS), locoregional-relapse free survival (LRRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), for breast-cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and December 2022, 396 patients (400 breasts) were treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy. Five-year LRFS was 98.8% (95% confidence interval: 97.1%-100%), and 5-year OS was 96.0% (95%CI: 92.6-99.5%). Age was statistically associated with OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, p = .01). Four patients (1.0%) experienced acute grade 3 radiation-induced adverse events, and 8 patients (2.3%) acute grade 2 toxicities. Twenty-three patients (5.8%) experienced late toxicity, all of them being graded as grade 1. The use of the 5.7 Gy-weekly-fraction regimen and the delivery of a tumor bed boost were significantly associated with acute radiodermatitis (p < .01; p = .02; respectively) and late fibrosis (p < .01; p = .049; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with an excellent tumor control rate in our 'real-life' cohort with low-risk breast cancer patients. However, delivery of a tumor bed boost and using weekly 5.7-Gy fractions were associated with an increased risk of acute and late cutaneous toxicities.

Effect of Cold Therapy on Managing Postoperative Pain Following Breast Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cold therapy is an important non-pharmacologic method used for pain relief. AIM: In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of cold therapy on managing postoperative pain following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and assess its effect on recovering quality. METHOD: The study was planned and implemented as a randomized controlled clinical study. Sixty patients with breast cancer were included in this study. All patients underwent BCS at Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. There were 30 patients in both the cold therapy and control groups. In the cold therapy group, a cold pack was placed around the incision line for 15 minutes every hour from the first hour after the operation until the 24th hour. To all the patients in both groups, pain levels were measured by visual analog scale (VAS) at the postoperative 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours, respectively, and the quality of recovery was evaluated by a Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire at the postoperative 24th hour. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 53 (range: 24-71). All patients were T1-2 clinically and had no lymph node metastasis. Interestingly, the mean of pain level in the cold therapy group was statistically significantly lower in the first 24 hours (1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours) of the postoperative period (p = .001). Notably, the cold therapy group had higher recovering quality than the control group. In the first 24 hours, only 4 (12.5%) patients in the cold therapy group received additional analgesics, whereas all patients (100%) in the control group received additional analgesics (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cold therapy is an easy and effective non-pharmacologic method for pain relief after BCS in patients with breast cancer. Cold therapy reduces the acute pain of the breast and contributes to the quality of recovery of those patients.

Oncoplastic Augmentation Mastopexy in Breast Conservation Therapy: Retrospective Study and Postoperative Complications.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic techniques, in conjunction with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, have been demonstrated to achieve good aesthetic results and cancer outcomes in the treatment of patients with macromastia or significant ptosis. This study evaluated a series of patients undergoing breast conservation with concomitant oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy and a contralateral augmentation-mastopexy. METHODS: Patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast conservation were identified via a retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included patients with ptosis and preexisting breast implants or insufficient breast volume undergoing oncoplastic implant placement/exchange and mastopexy. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (64 breasts, 4 unilateral procedures) were included in the study. Average age was 51.4 years, average body mass index was 27, and 38.2% were smokers/former smokers. The average operative time was 2.5 hours. Furthermore, 38.2% of patients received chemotherapy, and 82.4% of patients received breast adjuvant radiotherapy. The average length of follow-up was 11.7 months. In the sample that received radiation, the capsular contracture rate was 25%, with a 7.1% contracture revision rate. For the entire group, a total of 8 patients (23.5%) underwent revisions for either positive margins (8.8%), capsular contracture (8.8%), implant loss (2.9%), or cosmetic concerns (2.9%). One patient developed a pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: Oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy is a safe technique with acceptable complication rates. This technique is best used for breast cancer patients with breast ptosis and a paucity of breast volume or preexisting implants who wish to pursue breast-conserving therapy. The revision rates are acceptable compared with single-stage cosmetic augmentation procedures as well as other oncoplastic techniques described in the literature, but patients must be clearly counseled on contracture risk.

Use of polysaccharide hemostatic agent (HaemoCer™) in breast cancer surgery to reduce postoperative complications: A randomised controlled trial.

Postoperative wound-site bleeding, tissue inflammation and seroma formation are well-known complications in the field of breast surgery. Hemostatic agents consisting of polysaccharides may be used intra-operatively to minimise postoperative complications. We conducted a prospective randomised-controlled, single-centre study including 136 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for invasive or intraductal breast cancer. Of these, 68 patients were randomised to receive an absorbable polysaccharide hemostatic agent into the wound site during surgery, while 68 patients were randomised to the control group and did not receive any hemostatic agent. Primary outcome was the total volume of postoperative drained fluid from the surgical site. Secondary outcomes were the number of days until drain removal and rate of immediate postoperative surgical site infection Patients in the intervention group had significantly higher drainage output volumes compared with the control group 85 mL (IQR 46.25-110) versus 50 mL (IQR 30-75), respectively; (P = .003). Univariable linear regression analyses showed a significant association between the surgical specimen and the primary outcome (P < .001). After multivariable analysis, the use of absorbable polysaccharide hemostatic product was no longer significantly associated with a higher drainage output and only the size of the surgical specimen remained a significant predictor. The number of days until drainage removal and the postoperative seroma formation were higher in the intervention group (P = .004) and (P = .003), respectively. In our study, intraoperative application of polysaccharide hemostatic agent during breast-conserving surgery did not decrease postoperative fluid production. Only the size of the surgical specimen was significantly associated with postoperative drainage volume.