Clinical and radiographic outcome of tension band suture fixation for displaced olecranon fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tension band wire fixation (TBW) is a well-described method for treating displaced olecranon fractures. Further surgery is often needed due to wound breakdown or prominent hardware. An all-suture technique has recently been described as an alternative to TBW but radiographic and clinical outcome are not well established. The aim of this single-center retrospective cohort study was to evaluate outcome after treatment with all-suture technique for simple displaced olecranon fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of olecranon fractures in patients (> 18 years) treated for displaced olecranon fractures with tension band suture fixation (TBSF) between February and August 2019 was performed in our facility. Primary outcome was revision surgery, which was assessed four years after surgery. Clinical and radiographical follow-up was performed at two weeks, six weeks, three months and six months to assess union rate, fracture displacement, range of motion (ROM), Quick-DASH and Oxford Elbow Score. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. Median age was 64 years [IQR:39-73], 9 patients were male and median ASA score was 2 [IQR:1-2]. 15 fractures were Mayo type 2 A and 9 type 2B with minor comminution. At four-year follow-up, three patients had died. None of the remaining 21 patients had undergone revision surgery. At six months, the median Quick-DASH and Oxford Elbow Score were 2.3 [IQR:0-4.5] and 47 [IQR:46-48], respectively. Median elbow extension and flexion deficits were 0° [IQR:0-2.25] and 0° [IQR:0-0], respectively. Radiographic union was achieved in all patients. In two cases radiographic loss of reduction and malunion was observed but both patients were asymptomatic and had no functional deficits. One patient refractured the elbow due to a second trauma and was reoperated. CONCLUSIONS: TBSF is a promising technique for Mayo type 2 A and 2B fractures with minor comminution. There were no revision surgeries within the first four years. We found good functional outcomes and a high union rate.

A novel fragment specific classification of complex olecranon fractures: 3-dimensional model design, radiological validation, and proposed surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications for proximal ulna fracture patterns rely on qualitative data and cannot inform surgical planning. We propose a new classification system based on a biological and anatomical stress analysis. Our hypothesis is that fragment types in complex fractures can be predicted by the tendon and ligament attachments on the proximal ulna. METHODS: First, we completed a literature review to identify quantitative data on proximal ulna soft tissue attachments. On this basis, we created a 3-dimensional model of ulnar anatomy with SliceOMatic and Catia V5R20 software and determined likely locations for fragments and fracture lines. The second part of the study was a retrospective radiological study. A level-1 trauma radiological database was used to identify computed tomography scans of multifragmentary olecranon fractures from 2009 to 2021. These were reviewed and classified according to the "fragment specific" classification and compared to the Mayo and the Schatzker classifications. RESULTS: Twelve articles (134 elbows) met the inclusion criteria and 7 potential fracture fragments were identified. The radiological study included 67 preoperative computed tomography scans (mean 55 years). The fragments identified were the following: posterior (40%), intermediate (42%), tricipital (100%), supinator crest (25%), coronoid (18%), sublime tubercle (12%), and anteromedial facet (18%). Eighteen cases (27%) were classified as Schatzker D (comminutive) and 21 (31%) Mayo 2B (stable comminutive). Inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.71 among 3 observers. CONCLUSION: This proposed classification system is anatomically based and considers the deforming forces from ligaments and tendons. Having a more comprehensive understanding of complex proximal ulna fractures would lead to more accurate fracture evaluation and surgical planning.

Orthogonal plating for complex olecranon fractures: retrospective case series with patient-reported outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for complex olecranon fractures with metaphyseal comminution can be challenging. To improve reduction maneuvers and augment stability, we apply a small medial and/or lateral locking compression plate (LCP) prior to placing a posterior contoured 3.5 mm-2.7 mm LCP. The aim is to describe our technique and outcomes of this "orthogonal" plating technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 26 patients were treated with orthogonal plating. Clinical outcome variables were available for all patients at a median of 27 months (IQR 6-54), and patient-reported outcomes (Q-DASH and MEPS) for 23 patients at 38 months (IQR 18-71). RESULTS: All fractures healed at a median of 2.0 months (IQR 1.5-3.8). The median elbow flexion was 120°, extension-deficit 15°, pronation 88°, and supination 85°. The median Q-DASH was 9 (IQR 0-22) and the median MEPS was 90 (IQR 80-100). Hardware was electively removed in seven patients. One patient had a late superficial infection that resolved with hardware removal and antibiotics, and one patient had two consecutive re-fractures after two hardware removals; and healed after the second revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Orthogonal plating with a posterior LCP and a small medial and/or lateral LCP is a safe technique that leads to excellent healing rates, and good clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Long-term Functional Consequences of Surgically Treated Pediatric and Adolescent Olecranon Fractures: Does the Presence of Associated Fractures and Surgical Procedure Affect the Results?

BACKGROUND: Olecranon fractures are rare conditions in childhood. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the results in surgically treated pediatric and adolescent olecranon fractures. METHODS: The orthopaedic trauma database of a large academic tertiary center was retrospectively searched for patients who had sustained an olecranon fracture and were treated surgically between 2005 and 2021. Data related to demographic features, additional fractures, and the presence of any disease were obtained from the patient files. Mayo elbow performance score and the Turkish-language version of the shortened version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scale were the main functional outcome measurements. RESULTS: The study included 37 elbows of 34 patients with an average age at the time of surgery of 10.9±3.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 78.2±48.0 months (range, 12 to 196 mo). The 1-year fracture rate of contralateral olecranon was 75% in osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Concomitant fractures were 7 proximal radius, 1 medial epicondyle, and 2 capitellum fractures. The surgical treatment methods were tension band wiring (TBW), open reduction and isolated K-wire fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CR-PP), and open reduction-plate fixation. The mean implant removal time in patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation was 2.2 months, open reduction and isolated K-wire fixation 4.7 months, and TBW 12.7 months ( P =0.004). The mean disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scale was 1.9. The mean Mayo elbow performance score was 100. Grade 1 elbow arthritis was determined in 3 patients. No patient underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment modalities provided excellent long-term functional results and low complication rates without the need for revision. Closed reduction-percutaneous fixation and open reduction-isolated K-wire fixation were associated with shorter implant removal times compared with TBW. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Hardware complications and reoperations following precontoured plate fixation of the olecranon: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Several fixation techniques have been described to treat acute olecranon fractures. Plate fixation is often used because of its superior mechanical properties. The reported rates of reoperation after olecranon plate fixation have been quite heterogeneous. The purpose of this study was to establish an updated reoperation rate based on modern precontoured plate constructs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used population-level administrative data to identify all surgically treated adult patients with olecranon fractures at 4 hospitals in Edmonton, AB, Canada, between 2010 and 2015. Radiographic review was conducted to identify patients who underwent precontoured olecranon plate fixation. Fracture characteristics including Mayo fracture classification and other concomitant upper-extremity injuries were identified. Chart reviews were performed to determine patient characteristics and patients who required reoperation. The primary reason for and type of reoperation were determined. RESULTS: Six hundred patients were surgically treated for olecranon fractures. Precontoured plate fixation was used in 321 patients. The average age of included patients was 56 years (standard deviation [SD], 19.4 years), and there were 173 female patients (53.9%). Reoperation was required in 90 patients (28%). For 50 patients, implant-related irritation was the primary reason for reoperation, representing 55.6% of the patients who underwent reoperation (50 of 90) and 15.6% of the total cohort (50 of 321). Other reasons for reoperation included hardware failure in 17 patients (5.3%), infection in 9 (2.8%), and contracture in 9 (2.8%). Patients who required reoperation were significantly younger (52.9 years [SD, 18.1 years] vs. 57.7 years [SD, 19.4 years]; P = .048) and had significantly higher rates of type III olecranon fractures (17.8% [16 of 90] vs. 8.2% [19 of 231]; P = .04) and Monteggia fractures (13.3% [12 of 90] vs. 4.8% [11 of 231]; P = .008). A multivariate logistic regression model also demonstrated increased odds ratios (ORs) for overall reoperation in patients with Monteggia fractures (OR, 2.99 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-7.17]; P = .014) and for reoperation due to implant-related irritation in younger patients (OR, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.996]; P = .018). No discerning factors were identified for the 50 patients who underwent hardware removal for implant-related irritation compared with the whole reoperation group (n = 90). CONCLUSION: This study found that patients with olecranon fractures treated with precontoured plates experienced a hardware removal rate of 15.6% for implant-related irritation. Patients who sustained more complex fractures, such as Monteggia injuries, demonstrated higher rates of reoperation. Increasing age may be associated with lower rates of reoperation. In patients who required reoperation, there were no identifiable radiographic or clinical characteristics that were associated with implant-related irritation as their primary reason for reoperation.

When Is an Isolated Olecranon Fracture Pathognomonic for Osteogenesis Imperfecta?

BACKGROUND: Isolated fractures of the olecranon process of the ulna in pediatric patients with open physes are classically considered pathognomonic for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The purpose of this study was to distinguish the clinical manifestations of isolated olecranon fractures in patients with and without OI to help practitioners assess when further evaluation for OI may be necessary. METHODS: All patients younger than 18 years old who were treated for an isolated olecranon fracture at a pediatric tertiary care center between 2009 and 2021 were identified. Patients without radiographs available for review, those with known skeletal dysplasia other than OI, and patients with multiple fractures (eg, polytraumas) or with concomitant dislocations were excluded. Of the 701 patients identified, 403 were included for analysis. Demographic variables, mechanism of injury, treatment type, and determination of OI diagnosis were collected. Patients with a previously confirmed diagnosis of OI or with genetic confirmation of OI following their fracture were designated as OI (+), and the remainder were designated OI (-). The Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Of the 403 patients, the median age was 7.8 years (interquartile range 5.2 to 12.5), and 270 (67%) were male. There were 14 confirmed cases of OI (3.5%). The OI (+) and OI (-) groups did not differ significantly by age or sex (P>0.05). OI (+) patients were more likely to sustain an injury from low-energy mechanisms (86% vs. 32%, P<0.001), sustain displaced fractures (86% vs. 21%, P<0.001) and undergo operative treatment (86% vs. 20%, P<0.001), and to report a history of previous fracture (79% vs. 16%, P<0.001) than OI (-) patients. 36% of OI (+) patients sustained a second olecranon fracture during the study period; there were no subsequent olecranon fractures in the OI (-) group. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated olecranon fractures may not be pathognomonic for OI. However, orthopaedists must be vigilant about the possibility of OI in patients who sustain displaced, isolated olecranon fractures under low-energy mechanisms with a history of previous fracture(s). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes of embedded rafting k-wire technique for intermediate articular fragment fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures.

BACKGROUND: Severely comminuted olecranon fractures are challenging injuries. Commonly used tension band wiring exerts excessive compressive forces causing olecranon shortening and joint incongruity. This study aimed to introduce the embedded rafting k-wire technique with the bridging technique for intermediate articular fragment fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures and evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 patients with comminuted olecranon fractures were treated with rafting k-wire fixation combined with a locking plate. Time to union, the number of rafting k-wires in the intermediate articular fragment, quality of joint reduction, and secondary reduction loss were analyzed. Elbow range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and complications were evaluated at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Fracture union was obtained in all patients. The mean number of intermediate articular fragments was 2.4 ± 0.7, and the average number of rafting k-wires was 3.0 ± 1.2. There were mild and moderate degree early posttraumatic osteoarthritis in 6 cases (17.6%) at the mean 20.8 months of follow-up. At the final follow-up, the mean range of elbow motion was 4.6° of flexion contracture and 133.5° of further flexion. The average MEPS was 97.1 (range, 75-100). Two patients had heterotrophic ossification without functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The embedded rafting k-wire technique with bridging plates in comminuted olecranon fractures exhibited satisfactory outcomes. This method might serve as an alternative when considering the ability to restore articular congruency and stability in severely comminuted olecranon fragments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic.

Long-term results of olecranon fractures treated using the XS nail® system.

PURPOSE: Olecranon fractures are particularly vulnerable to distraction and subsequent fracture dislocation due to the high tensile forces. Surgical treatment aims at reducing the fracture and restoring the anatomical joint surface condition, as well as neutralizing the strain inhibiting fracture healing. The XS nail® (Intercus GmbH, Bad Blankenberg, Germany), an intramedullary implant exerting compression across the entire fracture surface, unlike plates, leaves a minimal extra-cortical profile, and can be secured with threaded locking wires, thereby retaining the anatomical reduction without displacement or steps within the articular surface, which was often found in tension band wiring. After encouraging initial results, the long-term outcome was assessed. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the long-term outcome of patients surgically treated at our trauma center between January 2002 and December 2005 using the XS nail®. Patients over the age of 18 years eligible for the study must have undergone surgery for isolated, recent (less than 14 days) traumatic olecranon fractures, without concomitant injuries to the ipsilateral elbow and forearm. Further exclusion criteria were pseudarthrosis, re-fractures and osteotomy for distal humerus surgery, as well as polytraumatized patients unable to aid in their own recovery. Data were retrospectively gathered by standardised questionnaire and patient records, as well as surgery and anesthesiology reports. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel® 2016. RESULTS: There were 32 patients, 13 males (mean age 49.0 years) and 19 females (mean age 68.9 years) with 11 Schatzkers type D, 7 each type A and C, 5 type B and 2 type E at an average of 55.2 months, all showing complete consolidation. Of them, 6 patients had a loss of range of motion with more than 10° in the sagittal plane, and only 1 patient exceeded 10° reduction of supination. Twenty-five patients reported being pain-free under all circumstances, and all but 2 patients (93.75%) had returned to their previous activity level. The average disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 21.15 (range 0-88.3), and the overall Mayo elbow performance index was 91.87, without complications, such as wound infection, neurovascular impairment or premature hardware removal. CONCLUSION: Using the XS nail® system, all fracture types can be successfully treated and the rate of complications was lower than that treated by standard methods published in current literature. An excellent functional outcome, high range of motion as well as good retention of reduction without soft tissue irritation makes this a very suitable implant for fractures subject to tension.

Low-profile double plating versus dorsal LCP in stabilization of the olecranon fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal ulna fractures are common in orthopaedic surgery. Comminuted fractures require a high primary stability by the osteosynthesis, to allow an early functional rehabilitation as fast as possible, to reduce long-term limitations of range of motion. Classical dorsal plating is related to wound healing problems due to the prominence of the implant. New low-profile double plates are available addressing the soft tissue problems by positioning the plates at the medial and lateral side. This study analysed whether, under high loading conditions, these new double plates provide an equivalent stability as compared to the rigid olecranon locking compression plate (LCP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Sawbones, Mayo Type IIB fractures were simulated and stabilized by plate osteosyntheses: In group one, two low-profile plates were placed. In group two, a single dorsal plate (LCP) was used. The bones was than cyclically loaded simulating flexion grades of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of the elbow joint with increasing tension forces (150 , 150 , 300  and 500 N). The displacement and fracture gap movement were recorded. In the end, in load-to-failure tests, load at failure and mode of failure were determined. RESULTS: No significant differences were found for the displacement and fracture gap widening during cyclic loading. Under maximum loading, the double plates revealed a comparable load at failure like the single dorsal plate (LCP). The double plates failed with a proximal screw pull-out of the plate, whereas in the LCP group, in 10 out of 12 specimens the mode of failure was a diaphyseal shaft fracture at the distal plate peak. CONCLUSION: Biomechanically, the double plates are a good alternative to the dorsal LCP providing a high stability under high loading conditions and, at the same, time reducing the soft tissue irritation by a lateral plate position.

Biomechanical comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation with locking screws in transverse olecranon fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tension band wiring (TBW) is the standard method for treating transverse olecranon fractures, but high rates of complications and reoperations have been reported. Plate fixation (PF) with locking screws has been introduced as an alternative method that may retain the fracture reduction better with a higher load to failure. METHODS: Twenty paired cadaveric elbows were used. All soft tissues except for the triceps tendon were removed. A standardized transverse fracture was created, and each pair was allocated randomly to TBW or PF with locking screws. The triceps tendon was mounted to the materials testing machine with the elbow in 90° of flexion. Construct stiffness was compared 3 times. Then, the elbows underwent a chair lift-off test by loading the triceps tendon to 300 N for 500 cycles. Finally, a load-to-failure test was performed, and failure mechanism was recorded. RESULTS: The construct stiffness of PF was higher in the first of 3 measurements. No difference was observed in the cyclic test or in load to failure. Hardware failure was the failure mechanism in 8 of 10 TBW constructs, and all failures occurred directly under the twists of the metal wire. Hardware failure was the cause of failure in only 1 elbow in the PF group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in fracture displacement following fixation with TBW and PF with locking screws in transverse olecranon fractures. However, assessment of the mode of hardware failure identified the metal cerclage twist as the weakest link in the TBW construct.

Can low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures reduce implant removal? A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Because of poor soft-tissue coverage at the proximal ulna and prominent posteriorly positioned implants, hardware removal remains the most common reason for revision surgery of olecranon fractures that were operatively treated using plate osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis would reduce the number of soft tissue-related hardware removals compared with single posterior plating whereas the functional results would be comparable. METHODS: This study retrospectively included patients who were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis or a posterior 2.7-/3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for isolated olecranon fractures from 3 study centers. In addition to the implant removal rate, functional outcome measures (range of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) were statistically compared. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range, 24-77 months). Of these patients, 37 were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 42, with a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18-93 years). Range of motion after treatment with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP measured 129° (range, 80°-155°) and 139° (range, 100°-155°), respectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 95 (range, 65-100) and 99 (range, 85-100), respectively (P = .028), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 5.0 (range, 0-49) and 4.6 (range, 0-28), respectively (P = .673). Hardware was removed in 32% and 50% of patients after treatment with double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP, respectively (P = .11). Hardware removal owing to soft-tissue irritation was noted in 27% of patients after double-plate osteosynthesis and 38% after LCP treatment (P = .30). DISCUSSION: Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. However, the rate of hardware removal was not significantly reduced, and the functional results were comparable to those of common single-posterior plate osteosynthesis.

The ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures? An economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The ideal implant for stable, noncomminuted olecranon fractures is controversial. Tension band wiring (TBW) is associated with lower cost but higher implant removal rates.On the other hand, plate fixation (PF) is purported to be biomechanically superior, with lower failure and implant removal rates, although associated with higher cost. The primary aim of this study is to look at the clinical outcomes for all Mayo 2A olecranon between PF and TBW. The secondary aim is to perform an economic evaluation of PF vs. TBW. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all surgically treated Mayo 2A olecranon fractures in a tertiary hospital from 2005-2016. Demographic data, medical history, range of motion, and complications were collected. All inpatient and outpatient costs in a 1-year period postsurgery including the index surgical procedure were collected via the hospital administrative cost database (normalized to 2014). RESULTS: A total of 147 cases were identified (94 TBW, 53 PF). PF was associated with higher mean age (P < .01), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < .01), and higher proportion of hypertensives (P = .04). There was no difference in the range of motion achieved at 1 year for both groups. In terms of complications, TBW was associated with more symptomatic hardware (21.6% vs. 13.7%, P = .24) and implant failures (16.5% vs. none, P < .01), whereas the plate group had a higher wound complication (5.9% vs. none, P = .02) and infection rate (9.8% vs. 3.1%, P = .09). TBW had a higher implant removal rate of 30.9% compared with 22.7% for PF (P = .36). PF had a higher cost at all time points, from the index surgery ($10,313.64 vs. $5896.36, P < .01), 1-year cost excluding index surgery ($5069.61 vs. $3850.46, P = .46), and outpatient cost ($1667.80 vs. $1613.49, P = .27). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on our study results, we have demonstrated that TBW is the ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures from both a clinical and economic standpoint, with comparable clinical results, potentially similar implant removal rates as PF's, and a lower cost over a 1-year period. In choosing the ideal implant, the surgeon must take into account, first, the local TBW and PF removal rate, which can vary significantly because of the patient's profile and beliefs, and second, the PF implant cost.

Intramedullary Fixation of Both Bone Forearm Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Healing Correlates With Development of the Olecranon Apophysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether healing of both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures in children and adolescents is associated with the stage of the olecranon apophysis development as described by the Diméglio modification of the Sauvegrain method. METHODS: Records were reviewed from 2 children's hospitals from 1997 to 2008 to identify all patients younger than 18 years of age who had BBFA fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Sixty-three patients were identified meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The stage of the olecranon apophysis was noted on the lateral radiograph at the time of the injury. Data were statistically analyzed to assess the olecranon stage at which the increased rate of delayed union becomes more prevalent using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Time to union, complications, and need for reoperation were recorded for each group. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred ninety-eight patient records were reviewed with 63 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, a cutoff of olecranon stage > 3 (stages 4 to 7) was a significant predictor of the increased rate of delayed union time compared with olecranon stages 0 to 3 (P=0.004). Non-healing-related complication rates for each group were 2/28 (7.1%) for olecranon stages and 0 to 3 and 6/35 (17.1%) for olecranon stages 4 to 7. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of delayed union for BBFA fractures that have been treated with intramedullary nail fixation is increased in children with more mature olecranon apophyses as compared with those with younger olecranon stages. We propose the use of the stage of olecranon apophysis development when choosing the surgical approach and implant for when treating operative BBFA fractures in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Surgical technique in tension band wiring method for selected comminuted olecranon fractures.

BACKGROUND: The use of tension band wiring (TBW) for comminuted olecranon fractures is less recommendable these days. However, some experts preferentially apply TBW to comminuted fractures resulting in favorable outcomes. We here present the surgical technique using TBW with eyelet and absorbable pins for selected comminuted olecranon fractures and review the clinical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-four surgically treated patients with Colton Group 2C or 2D olecranon fractures in focus on the intermediate fragment (IMF) were enrolled. IMFs were primarily fixed with buried bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid pins followed by definitive fixation of the olecranon process with TBW with eyelet. The adequacy of the reconstructed notch was especially estimated by parameters on radiographs using digital imaging software. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 30 months (10 to 86 months). All 24 fractures achieved union, and the maintenance of the articular curvature was confirmed according to statistical analysis on radiographs. The average elbow flexion was 135.1° (range 100° to 145°), and the average elbow extension was - 4.8° (range - 20° to 10°). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 97.3 points (range 80 to 100 points). No cases of pin migration, infection, nerve problem, heterotrophic ossification, or secondary osteoarthritis were observed. CONCLUSIONS: For selected comminuted olecranon fractures, TBW with the eyelet pins and biodegradable pins could yield satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Olecranon Fractures in Pediatric Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

BACKGROUND: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a hereditary disorder characterized by an abnormality of the quality or quantity of type I collagen, leading to bone fragility. Fractures in children with OI may result from minor trauma and have atypical patterns. Previous studies have found a strong relationship between olecranon fractures and OI in pediatric populations, but the characteristics of olecranon fractures within the OI patient population have not been fully described. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 358 children with a diagnosis of OI. Of those, 29 had at least 1 olecranon fracture. We collected general information relating to the patient's diagnosis of OI including OI type, fracture history, mobility, and bisphosphonate treatment. Information regarding the fracture, treatment, and the occurrence of bilateral fractures were recorded, as well as weight, height, and axial bone mineral density z-score from the time of the fracture. RESULTS: Within our OI population of 358 patients, we found an incidence of olecranon fracture of 8.1% (29 patients). The olecranon fractures occurred predominantly in the type I population (27 of 29). Within the population of patients specifically with OI type I (200 patients) the incidence is 13.5%, with 6% of OI type I patients sustaining bilateral olecranon fractures. The percentage of children with one olecranon fracture subsequently sustaining another on the contralateral side was 41.4%. The mean time to the second fracture was 5 months. The mean age at the time of the first olecranon fracture was 11.9 years old. The average axial bone mineral density z-score was -2.5 for primary fractures. All 12 patients who suffered a contralateral olecranon fracture had OI type I. CONCLUSIONS: Olecranon fractures in the OI population occur most commonly in patients with type I OI and during early adolescence, a period of rapid growth. There is a high rate of bilateral olecranon fractures, with the contralateral fracture occurring quickly after the primary fracture. Further studies may elucidate risk factors to determine which patients are most likely to fracture the contralateral side and therefore drive treatment and potentially prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of displaced olecranon fractures treated with the Olecranon Sled.

BACKGROUND: Tension-band wiring is largely considered the gold standard for fixation of displaced olecranon fractures despite high rates of hardware complications. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of displaced olecranon fractures treated with the Olecranon Sled. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all displaced olecranon fractures from 2011-2015 treated with the Olecranon Sled. Inclusion was limited to functionally independent patients with Mayo type II fractures and minimum 12-month follow-up. We assessed clinical outcomes including range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a mean follow-up period of 31.8 months (range, 12-71 months) were included in the study. All patients indicated satisfactory outcomes. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 95.5 (range, 70-100), and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 3.1 (range, 0-18.3). The mean total arc of elbow flexion was 145° (range, 134°-158°), and the mean total arc of forearm rotation was 175° (range, 160°-180°). There were no hardware-related complications. The overall complication rate was 4.5% (1 of 22) as significant heterotopic ossification developed in 1 patient, requiring contracture release. CONCLUSION: The Olecranon Sled is a reliable and well-tolerated implant for the treatment of olecranon fractures. This device results in excellent functional outcomes and may obviate hardware removal.

Core curriculum case illustration: olecranon fracture.

This is the 31st installment of a series that will highlight one case per publication issue from the bank of cases available online as part of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) educational resources. Our goal is to generate more interest in and use of our online materials. To view more cases online please visit the ASER Core Curriculum and Recommendations for Study online at: http://www.erad.org/page/CCIP_TOC .

[Olecranon fractures]. / Olekranonfrakturen.

Olecranon fractures represent a common elbow injury and they are usually treated operatively. Depending on fracture morphology conservative therapy can be considered in geriatric patients. When surgical treatment is performed the anatomical features of the proximal ulna have to be taken into consideration. Tension band wiring is considered a standard procedure for simple fractures and provides good clinical results. Plate osteosynthesis is indicated for more complex fracture patterns. Nowadays, many surgeons prefer plate fixation over tension band wiring even for simple fractures as it leads to a more stable fixation. Both methods frequently require hardware removal for persisting soft tissue irritation. The use of modern low-profile plates could reduce the need for implant removal due to better soft tissue coverage. The available clinical data regarding low-profile plates are promising but limited.

[Verification of the Necessity for the Open Reduction and Tension Band Wiring of the Displaced Olecranon Fracture in Younger Children]. / Overení nutnosti otevrené repozice a tahové cerkláze u dislokované zlomeniny okovce u mensích detí.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Olecranon fractures in skeletally immature patients are rather rare and represent up to 7% of elbow skeletal injuries. Although the majority of olecranon fractures is constituted by undisplaced fractures treated conservatively with good outcomes, a few of them require surgery. The aim of the study was to compare two different approaches of surgical treatment - the open reduction with tension band wiring - cerclage (ORCe) and the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). MATERIAL AND METHODS 37 patients (28 boys, 9 girls) were included in the retrospective multicentric study. The patients were treated at two different institutions (the Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the University Hospital Brno and the Department of Paediatric Surgery and Traumatology, the University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic). 17 patients underwent the ORCe procedure, while 20 patients were treated using the CRPP method. Different parameters were statistically compared in the groups (demographic data, data concerning the course of the therapy, outcome of the therapy in terms of movements' restrictions and complications such as osteosynthesis failure and infection). RESULTS Both the groups were comparable in terms of demographic data because no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of the age (p = 0.082), the affected site (p = 1.000) and the gender (p = 0.462). Statistically significant difference between these two groups was found in the interval between the implementation and the removal of the osteosynthetic material (p < 0.001) and in the length of cast immobilisation (p = 0.047). The number of patients with movement restriction up to 10° was statistically significantly higher in patients who underwent the CRPP procedure (p = 0.040), but no statistically significant difference was seen between these two groups in terms of movement restriction more than 10° (p = 0.609). One revision surgery was performed in the CRPP group, however with no statistical significance (p = 0.350). DISCUSSION The multicentric study included 37 children, who underwent surgical treatment of a displaced olecranon fracture. Compared to the studies dealing with this topic the number of patients included in this study is relatively high. It advocates the possibility of using the CRPP method as a good alternative to the gold-standard ORCe technique because no difference in terms of the number of revision surgeries and the clinically important movement restriction of more than 10° were seen. It also brings along advantages such as a simple surgical technique, good functional and cosmetic effects, reducing the risk of ischemic insult of growth plate and the possibility of osteosynthetic material removal at an outpatient department with no need for general anaesthesia. The risk of a higher radiation exposure of both the patient and the surgical team should be considered as a disadvantage of the closed method. CONCLUSIONS The mini-invasive CRPP appears to be a good alternative option to the ORCe method for the treatment of isolated olecranon fractures in children offering the advantages such as avoiding extensive open procedure and simple implants removal. Key words:children, olecranon, fracture, tension band wiring - cerclage, percutaneous pinning, elbow.

[Olecranon fractures]. / Fractures de l'olécrâne.

Olecranon fractures represent 5 % of all adult fractures. Management is most often surgical. Conservative treatment is recommended for non-displaced fractures or patients who would be poor surgical candidates. Prolonged immobilization of the elbow may cause joint stiffness, whereas surgical treatment can be complicated by loss of reduction or wound issues with secondary infection of the material. In this article, we discuss the pathology and the principles of treatment based on the literature, to allow the general practitioner to guide the patient towards the most suitable treatment.

Les fractures de l'olécrâne représentent 5 % de l'ensemble des fractures. Leur prise en charge est le plus souvent chirurgicale et le traitement conservateur est réservé aux fractures non déplacées ou à des patients qui seraient de mauvais candidats à la chirurgie. L'immobilisation prolongée du coude peut être responsable d'une raideur articulaire, alors qu'un traitement chirurgical peut entraîner des complications comme le démontage de l'ostéosynthèse ou des problèmes de cicatrisation avec infection précoce du matériel. Dans cet article, nous voulons rappeler les connaissances anatomopathologiques ainsi que les principes du traitement, basés sur la littérature, afin de permettre au médecin d'orienter son patient vers le traitement le plus adapté.