Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 35(4): 971-978, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811497

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of Ibuprofen and the application of photobiomodulation therapy protocol on the reduction of postoperative pain in endodontically treated teeth using a randomized clinical trial design. Seventy patients, diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, were selected. Treatment was performed by a single operator; a reciprocal system was used to prepare the canals; they were obturated using the Tagger's hybrid technique and coronally sealed with glass-ionomer cement. After treatment, patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the active control group, two Ibuprofen 600Ā mg tablets were administered within a 12-h interval. In the photobiomodulation therapy group, the irradiation was applied after treatment. The evaluation of postoperative pain was performed by another researcher blinded to the groups at 6, 12, 24, and 72Ā h intervals after treatment. To measure the outcome, two pain scales were used: numerical rate scale (NRS) and verbal rate scale (VRS). Data were analyzed using the chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon paired tests. Outcome was superior with photobiomodulation therapy at 6Ā h (pĀ < 0.001), 12Ā h (pĀ = 0.005), and 24Ā h (pĀ < 0.001) intervals compared with Ibuprofen. The results for the 72Ā h (pĀ = 0.317) interval were similar, both in the VRS and NRS scales. It may be concluded that the use of photobiomodulation therapy was effective in reducing pain within the first 24Ā h when compared with the administration of Ibuprofen 600Ā mg.


Subject(s)
Endodontics , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 35(5): 1095-1102, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659541

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on immediate postpartum pain relief during cesarean section. A randomized, parallel controlled trial was carried out. In total, 88 women with immediate postpartum were divided into 4 groups: control group (n = 22), placebo group (n = 22), experimental group I (n = 22, dose of 4 J/cm2), and experimental group II (n = 22, dose of 2 J/cm2). The pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), algometry, and Global Change Perception Scale (GCPS) was assessed at 12, 20-24, and 44-48 h postpartum. Two LLLT sessions were performed at 12 and 24 h postpartum. A significant interaction was observed between time versus group for NRS F (2.40) = 36.80, p < 0.001 and algometry F (1.70) = 27.18, p < 0.001. GCPS revealed a significant difference between the groups during second (p = 0.04) and third evaluation (p = 0.04). The NRS and algometry presented a large effect size for the experimental groups. LLLT is an efficient method to reduce pain and enhance the GCP in postcesarean section. No significant clinical differences were found between the laser doses.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult
3.
Clin Oral Investig ; 23(1): 285-292, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29658070

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, randomized, clinical study was to assess the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) with low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients, diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in lower molar teeth, participated in the study. All treatments were performed by a single operator. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: in the experimental group (EG), endodontic treatment was performed with a reciprocating system, immediately followed by PBM with LLLI; and only endodontic treatment was performed in the control group (CG). Postoperative pain was assessed by a second examiner, who was blinded, using two scales: verbal rating scale (VRS) and numerical rating scale (NRS). Assessment was carried out at 6, 12, and 24Ā h after treatment. Data were analyzed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney tests, ordinal, and non-parametric regression analyses. RESULTS: For the prevalence of pain, the difference between the groups was significant for the evaluations performed after 6Ā h (pĀ = 0.04) and 24Ā h (pĀ = 0.02). The difference after 24Ā h remained significant after stratification by sex and extrusion of filling material. Increased pain intensity was associated with extrusion of root canal filling material to the periapical region in the two scales used. CONCLUSION: The effect of PBM therapy after endodontic treatment showed a significant decreasein prevalence of postoperative pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The PBM reduces the prevalence of postoperative pain and may benefit patients who need endodontic treatment.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Root Canal Therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Pulpitis/therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Lasers Med Sci ; 33(8): 1639-1645, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29978268

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of low-power of 940-nm diode laser on post-operative pain after undisplaced flap surgery. This randomized clinical trial study was conducted using a split-mouth design. The study participants comprised 30 patients who needed periodontal flap surgery for periodontal pockets on the same tooth on both sides of the mandible. One side of the mandible was subjected to undisplaced flap surgery plus treatment with a 940-nm diode laser, and on the contralateral side, the surgery was conducted without applying the laser. Patients received anti-inflammatory medication and analgesics after surgery. The patients were asked to report the number of analgesics they took and the pain they experienced each night for 1Ā week using a visual analogue scale. An independent-sample t test was used to compare the results between the two groups. Patients reported less pain on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 after surgery in the laser-treated group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, fewer analgesics were used in this group on days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 following the surgery (p < 0.05). The 940-nm diode laser with the settings used in this study could significantly reduce pain and the number of analgesics taken by patients after undisplaced flap surgery.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Periodontal Pocket/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Adult , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Lasers Surg Med ; 49(2): 181-188, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27426042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Episiotomy is associated with perineal pain and healing complications. The low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces pain and inflammation and stimulates the healing process. This study aimed to assess the effect of LLLT on pain and perineal healing after an episiotomy. DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, triple-blind, parallel clinical trial with 54 postpartum women who had a spontaneous birth with a right mediolateral episiotomy. The women were randomized into two groups: the experimental group (applications of LLLT n = 29) or the placebo group (simulated LLLT applications n = 25). Three sessions of real or sham irradiation were performed at 6-10 hours after normal birth, and the 2nd and 3rd applications were performed at 20-24 hours and 40-48 hours after the first session, respectively. Perineal pain was recorded using a Numeric Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = absence and 10 = worst pain). Perineal healing was assessed using the redness, oedema, ecchymosis, discharge, and approximation (REEDA) scale. Both groups were assessed four times: in each of the three LLLT sessions and at 7-10 days after normal birth. The groups were compared using the Student's t, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding perineal healing after LLLT. The perineal pain scores were statistically higher in the experimental group in the first assessment and after the third LLLT. There was no significant difference between the groups related to the perineal pain scores 7-10 days after normal birth. CONCLUSION: The use of LLLT does not provide any benefit for treating postpartum perineal trauma using these specific protocol and parameters. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:181-188, 2017. Ā© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Episiotomy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Wound Healing/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Perineum , Young Adult
6.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 22(6): 780-787, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low-level laser has been widely used in Dentistry and many studies have focused on its application in oral surgeries. This study was conducted with the aim of searching for scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of laser to reduce pain or paresthesia related to orthognathic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, LILACS, SciELO, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ClinicalTrials.gov, up to November 2016, with no restrictions on language or year of publication. Additionally, a hand search of the reference list of the selected studies was carried out. The PICOS strategy was used to define the eligibility criteria and only randomized clinical trials were selected. RESULTS: Out of 1,257 identified citations, three papers fulfilled the criteria and were included in the systematic review. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane Guidelines for Clinical Trials and results were exposed based on a descriptive analysis. One study showed that laser therapy was effective to reduce postoperative pain 24 hours (P=0.007) and 72 hours (P=0.007) after surgery. Other study revealed the positive effect of laser to improve neurosensory recovery 60 days after surgery, evaluated also by the two-point discrimination (P=0.005) and sensory (P=0.008) tests. The third study reported an improvement for general sensibility of 68.75% for laser group, compared with 21.43% for placebo (P=0.0095), six months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Individual studies suggested a positive effect of low-level laser therapy on reduction of postoperative pain and acceleration of improvement of paresthesia related to orthognathic surgery. However, due to the insufficient number and heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis evaluating the outcomes of interest was not performed, and a pragmatic recommendation about the use of laser therapy is not possible. This systematic review was conducted according to the statements of PRISMA and was registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42016043258.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Paresthesia/radiotherapy , Humans , Postoperative Complications/radiotherapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
7.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 74(7): 1322.e1-8, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27055228

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on decreasing pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, split-mouth study included patients presenting 2 symmetrically impacted mandibular third molars. In each participant, one side was randomly assigned to laser treatment and the other side received placebo. LLLT was performed by intraoral application of a 660-nm laser (200Ā mW, 6Ā J per point at 4 points) followed by extraoral application of an 810-nm laser (200Ā mW, 6Ā J per point at 3 points). Irradiation at the 810-nm wavelength was repeated on days 2 and 4 after surgery. On the control side, the treatment protocol was similar to the experimental side, but with laser simulation. The main outcomes were the degree of pain during the next 7Ā days and the edema coefficients on days 2, 4, and 7 after surgery. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models to determine the effect of group and time on pain level and edema coefficients. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 40 patients. Pain level was significantly lower in the laser than in the placebo side at all time points during the experiment (P < .05). Swelling was significantly lower in the laser than in the placebo group on days 2, 4, and 7 after surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSION: LLLT proved effective in decreasing the intensity of pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars and can be recommended to alleviate patients' symptoms after surgery.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Double-Blind Method , Edema/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Male , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
9.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 42(1): 11-19, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252493

ABSTRACT

Objective: Photobiomodulation therapy has proven benefits in various dental treatments. The current systematic review aims to explore the role of laser photobiomodulation in modulating postoperative pain followed by endodontic treatment. Methods: In this systematic review, randomized controlled clinical trials on low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in endodontic therapy were analyzed. Database search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, followed by literature search in Google Scholar. Results: A total of 12 studies were included as per the set criteria. The included studies utilized diode laser (808-970 nm) and indium gallium aluminum. All the included studies evaluated postendodontic pain after root canal therapy and endodontic surgery. A majority of the included studies showed significant benefits of photobiomodulation in postoperative pain management in endodontic therapy.Heterogeneity of the laser parameters and lack of power calculations for sampling among the included studies preclude solid recommendation of use of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for postendodontic pain management. Conclusions: Although PBMT has proven potential benefits being a possible adjunct in postoperative pain management in endodontic therapy, it requires robust standardized randomized control trials to confirm the results of the systematic review.


Subject(s)
Endodontics , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Root Canal Therapy , Lasers, Semiconductor
10.
Lasers Med Sci ; 27(3): 559-66, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21617973

ABSTRACT

Pain, swelling, and trismus are the most common complications after surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of a low-level laser therapy (Laser Smile™, BiolaseĀ®, San Clemente, USA) applied to the wound appeared after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study was undertaken in 20 healthy patients with two symmetrically impacted lower third molars. The application of a low-level laser was made randomly on one of the two sides after surgery. The experimental side received 5Ā J/cm(2) of energy density, a wavelength of 810Ā nm, and an output power of 0.5Ā W. On the control side, a handpiece was applied intraorally, but the laser was not activated. Evaluations of postoperative pain, trismus, and swelling were made. The sample consisted of 11 women and nine men, and mean age was 23.35Ā years (18-37). The pain level in the first hours after surgery was lower in the experimental side than in the placebo side, although without statistically significant differences (p = 0.258). Swelling and trismus at the 2nd and 7th postoperative days were slightly higher in the control side, although not statistically significant differences were detected (p > 0.05). The application of a low-level laser with the parameters used in this study did not show beneficial affects in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus after removal of impacted lower third molars.


Subject(s)
Edema/radiotherapy , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Trismus/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Edema/etiology , Face , Female , Humans , Male , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prospective Studies , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Trismus/etiology , Young Adult
11.
Minerva Stomatol ; 61(7-8): 319-22, 2012.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22976514

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low level laser on the postoperative pain of patients who had to undergo third molar surgery. METHODS: In a randomized clinical setting, 100 patients were assigned to two groups of 50 in each. Every patient underwent surgical removal of one mandibular third molar (with osteotomy). After suturing the flap, the soft laser was applied to every patient. In group I laser radiation was applied by the dental assistant with output power of 100 mW, in continuous mode with sweeping motion, in group II, the laser hand piece was only brought into position without releasing energy, so that no patient knew which group he belonged to. The patient was given a pain evaluation form where they could determine their individual pain level and duration. RESULTS: The statistical tests showed significant difference in pain level between laser and control group (P<0.001) but no significant difference found in pain duration in two groups (P=0.019). CONCLUSION: The result of this study verifies the positive effect of the soft-laser therapy in the postoperative complication after third molar extraction.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Tooth Extraction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
12.
Electromagn Biol Med ; 30(1): 21-45, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21554100

ABSTRACT

A number of electromagnetic field-based technologies are available for therapeutic medical applications. These therapies can be broken down into different categories based on technical parameters employed and type of clinical application. Pulsed radio frequency energy (PRFE) therapy is a non invasive, electromagnetic field-based therapeutic that is based on delivery of pulsed, shortwave radio frequency energy in the 13-27.12Ā MHz carrier frequency range, and designed for local application to a target tissue without the intended generation of deep heat. It has been studied for use in a number of clinical applications, including as a palliative treatment for both postoperative and non postoperative pain and edema, as well as in wound healing applications. This review provides an introduction to the therapy, a summary of clinical efficacy studies using the therapy in specific applications, and an overview of treatment-related safety.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Pain Management , Postoperative Complications/radiotherapy , Radio Waves , Clinical Trials as Topic , Edema/metabolism , Edema/pathology , Edema/radiotherapy , Humans , Pain/metabolism , Pain/pathology , Pain, Postoperative/metabolism , Pain, Postoperative/pathology , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Postoperative Complications/metabolism , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Wound Healing/radiation effects
13.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 37(11): 669-680, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31589560

ABSTRACT

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is the term to define the wide range of laser applications using low-energy densities and based on photochemical mechanisms where the energy is transferred to the intracellular mitochondrial chromophores and respiratory chain components. In literature, a great number of works are reported showing the advantages of PBM use in many oral diseases such as recurrent aphthous stomatitis, herpes infections, mucositis, and burning mouth syndrome. Different factors may explain the increasing reported use of PBM in oral medicine: the absence of side effects, the possibility of safely treating compromised patients such as oncologic patients, the possibility of a noninvasive approach not associated with pain or discomfort, and the possibility of performing short sessions. The review's aim is to describe the possible applications of PBM in oral medicine, giving practitioners simple guide for practice together with the information of a new treatment possibility "at home" performed by the patient himself under supervision.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Mouth Diseases/radiotherapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Pain/radiotherapy , Contraindications, Procedure , Herpes Simplex/radiotherapy , Humans , Inflammation/radiotherapy , Oral Surgical Procedures , Wound Healing/radiation effects
14.
J Endod ; 44(11): 1610-1615, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144985

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In this clinical trial, we evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis. METHODS: Forty-two patients were included in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Root canal treatment was conducted using reciprocating instruments. The patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups using a Web program as follows: control (no laser was applied), placebo (mock laser therapy), and LLLT. Postoperative pain levels on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 30th day and postoperative percussion pain levels on the visual analog scale were recorded. The chi-square, 1-way analysis of variance, and least significant difference post hoc tests were performed to analyze the data (PĀ =Ā .05). RESULTS: LLLT resulted in lower pain levels than those noted in the control and placebo groups on days 1 and 3 (PĀ <Ā .05). There were no significant differences among the placebo, LLLT, and control groups in terms of postoperative percussion pain levels (PĀ <Ā .05). CONCLUSIONS: LLLT can be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain in endodontics.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Periapical Periodontitis/surgery , Root Canal Therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 36(1): 24-30, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023221

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of phototherapy on bite force, facial swelling, mandibular movements, and pain in patients having undergone surgical treatment for mandibular fractures. BACKGROUND: These are among the predominant types of facial fractures, and treatment involving surgical fixation with titanium plates is one of the most common procedures in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Phototherapy has been used to accelerate the muscle healing process and significantly improves muscle regeneration by inducing the formation of new muscle fibers. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1-active phototherapy, and Group 2-sham phototherapy. Both groups underwent the surgical procedure by the same surgeon using the same surgical technique. Dosimetric parameters are wavelength, 660 nm; power, 108 mW; radiant energy, 21.6 J; fluency, 21.6 J/cm2; radiance, 38197 mW/cm2; exposure time, 200 sec per point, 10 points bilaterally. Photobiomodulation was performed in 15 sessions. RESULTS: The primary variable was bite force measured with a gnathodynamometer and the secondary variables were facial swelling, mandibular movements (measured with digital calipers), and pain. The Student's t-test was used to determine intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest improvements in the laser group in comparison with the sham group with regard to mandibular dynamics, a reduction in postoperative facial swelling, a reduction in pain, and an increase in bite force.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing/radiation effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Mandibular Fractures/radiotherapy , Mandibular Fractures/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Bite Force , Cohort Studies , Edema/physiopathology , Edema/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Male , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Phototherapy/methods , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Am J Sports Med ; 35(5): 805-10, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17267771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic tendinosis have experienced early pain relief after application of bipolar radiofrequency treatment. Pathologic nerve ingrowth or nerve irritation in the tendon has been considered as a possible cause of the pain experienced with tendinosis. HYPOTHESIS: Bipolar radiofrequency treatment will ablate nerve fibers, resulting in pain relief. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Eight rats were treated with 2 points of bipolar radiofrequency applications applied to the hind paws with the Topaz microdebrider device, 6 sham rats had a needle applied to the hind paws, and there were 4 control rats. Tissues were processed for neural class III beta-tubulin (TUJ-1) or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunohistochemistry by using the free-floating avidin-biotin complex technique. The numbers of TUJ1-immunoreactive and CGRP-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the epidermis were counted and compared with sham and control. RESULTS: The number of nerve fibers demonstrated by both the antibodies of TUJ1 and CGRP were significantly decreased (P = .0002-.002) during the first 2 weeks after bipolar radiofrequency treatment. Macroscopically, the foot pad showed 2 dimples on the surface after bipolar radiofrequency treatment. Although it still showed a scar after 7 days, after 14 days it looked no different than the untreated contralateral control foot pad and foot pad of the sham group. CONCLUSION: Bipolar radiofrequency treatment induced acute degeneration and/or ablation of sensory nerve fibers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Degeneration or ablation of nerve fibers after bipolar radiofrequency treatment may explain the early postoperative pain relief after microtenotomy for tendinosis.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Nerve Fibers , Nociceptors , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Animals , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Male , Neurons, Afferent , Neuropeptides , Pain , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tendinopathy
17.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 17(6): 353-5, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17623586

ABSTRACT

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a well-recognized complication of spinal surgery. Pulse radiofrequency of dorsal root ganglion has been recently described for such patients. In this report, pulsed radiofrequency was applied in 3 patients with failed back surgery syndrome, presenting with severe pain. Reasonable to good pain relief was achieved in 2 patients in 6 months follow-up, however, one patient got short-term pain relief. Based on this limited experience in FBSS where conventional and non-conventional treatments are not effective, pulsed radiofrequency may be considered a logical choice.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Low Back Pain/radiotherapy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Radiofrequency Therapy , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Syndrome
18.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 35(8): 401-407, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28294694

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: The surgical removal of impacted third molars is one of the most common procedures performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine whether either transcutaneous or intraoral low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces postoperative pain and assists in the healing of mandibular third molar extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, placebo controlled, single-blind, split-mouth design study was conducted on 60 patients with full bony impacted similar position mandibular third molars bilaterally. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 each: transcutaneous LLLT and intraoral LLLT and the other side of each group treated with nonactive laser (60 teeth). The laser treatment consisted of administering laser energy immediately before and after the extraction procedure with gallium aluminum arsenide (GaAlAs) 830 nm diode lasers. Postoperative pain and healing of the sockets were compared in transcutaneous and intraoral group with placebo for 1 week following the extraction. Descriptive and bivariate statistics was computed, and the p-value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Intraoral LLLT application resulted in a statistically significant reduction of postoperative pain in comparison with transcutaneous laser group and placebo. The unhealed socket numbers were compared in two groups at seventh day and no differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that single-session intraoral LLLT is more effective than extraoral application for reducing postoperative pain. It was postulated that the differences between skin and mucosa could have effect on the results. Although intraoral use would allow closer application to the surgical site, the size of some laser devices precludes their use intraorally.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Mandible/surgery , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Wound Healing/radiation effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/radiation effects , Mouth/radiation effects , Reference Values , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology
19.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 172: 109-114, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Free gingival graft (FGG) is one of the most predictable techniques for gingival augmentation. However, patient's discomfort and pain during healing period are significant concerns. The aim of this study was to assess if laser photobiomodulation (PBM) was effective in terms of enhancing wound healing and reducing postoperative pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients participated in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Each patient had a 30-day interval between the two procedures. In the test group, donor and recipient sites received diode laser (660nm, 200mW, continuous mode, time of irradiation:32s, energy density: 4J/cm2, spot size:0.5cm) immediately after FGG surgery, and 1,2,4 and 7days later. The control side received the same sequence of irradiation with the laser-off. Complete wound epithelialization of donor site and clinical wound healing and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of donor and recipient sites were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: At 14 and 21days after surgery, the number of donor sites with complete epithelialization was greater in laser group compared to the placebo. After 21days, all donor sites in the test group were epithelialized completely, while at the same time, only eight donor sites in the control group showed complete epithelialization (P value=0.05). In terms of clinical healing of the recipient and donor sites, the test and control groups did not show any significant difference during the 45-day period, except at days 1 (for recipient site) and 14 (for donor site), when the test group showed better results (P values: 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). The VAS pain score did not show statistically significant difference between two groups during the study period, except for the first 3h after procedure when laser group showed greater VAS pain score (P values<0.05). CONCLUSION: PBM following FGG procedure with the parameters used in this study could accelerate the rate of epithelialization at the donor site. However, it did not reduce postoperative pain.


Subject(s)
Gingiva/transplantation , Lasers, Semiconductor , Mouth Diseases/therapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Wound Healing/radiation effects , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Female , Gingiva/cytology , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Diseases/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Placebo Effect
20.
Mt Sinai J Med ; 73(4): 716-8, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16878278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ilioinguinal neuralgia secondary to inguinal hernia repair is frequently a chronic, debilitating pain. It is most often due to destruction or entrapment of nerve tissue from staples, sutures, or direct surgical trauma. Treatment modalities, including oral analgesics, nerve blocks, mesh excision, and surgical neurectomy, have varied success rates. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has recently been described as a successful method of treating chronic groin pain. Unlike conventional radiofrequency, PRF is non-neurodestructive and therefore less painful and without the potential complications of neuritis-like reactions and neuroma formation. Although the mechanism is unknown, it appears that the interaction of an electromagnetic field and c-fos proteins may alter normal transmission of painful impulses. Our study examines five patients treated with PRF for ilioinguinal neuralgia secondary to inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHOD: Five patients were diagnosed with chronic ilioinguinal neuralgia secondary to inguinal hernia repair at our institution. Each patient was treated at vertebral T12, L1, and L2 with root PRF at 42 degrees C for 120 seconds per level. RESULTS: Four out of five patients reported pain relief lasting from four to nine months on follow-up visits. Only one patient reported no pain relief whatsoever. CONCLUSION: Ilioinguinal neuralgia is challenging to treat. We have demonstrated the successful use of PRF for four out of five patients seen in our office.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Neuralgia/radiotherapy , Pain, Postoperative/radiotherapy , Adult , Electromagnetic Fields , Female , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Tissue/injuries , Neuralgia/etiology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL