Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 245
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 53(5): 545-547, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30453744

ABSTRACT

Studies have found that expanded pharmacy technician roles can help "free up" pharmacist time, leading to role optimization. However, these studies and the positions taken by many are quite pharmacist-centric. We seem to have underestimated the importance of support staff in pharmacy operations. If research demonstrates that technicians can perform a function safely and effectively, that alone should compel the function's allowance in practice. Freeing up pharmacist time for higher-order care is a positive corollary to technician advancement, but it need not be a precondition for it.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy Technicians , Professional Role , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/standards , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Education, Pharmacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Pharmacy/standards , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Services/standards , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacists/psychology , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Technicians/education , Pharmacy Technicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Technicians/psychology , Pharmacy Technicians/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Practice/standards , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data , Professional Role/psychology
2.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 77(6): 496-505, 2019 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31564420

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to identify the main texts applicable to the practice of pharmacy in Quebec, then count the specific number of recommendations and criteria and describe the evolution of the legal and normative framework. METHODS: This is a descriptive and retrospective study of the main texts applicable to the legal and normative framework for the practice of pharmacy on January 1st, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 107 texts relating to the practice of pharmacy in Quebec were identified. They come from the legislator (53.1 %), the Order of pharmacists (26.1 %) or other organizations (20.8 %). These were laws/regulations (n=59), contributing to the optimal use of drugs (n=18), relating to hospital pharmacy management (n=18), the provision of pharmaceutical care (n=11), drug preparation (n=3), oncology practice (n=2) or health and safety at work (n=1). Thirty-three texts were considered for enumeration of recommendations and explicit criteria, for a total of 235 recommendations and 3703 explicit criteria applicable to the practice of hospital pharmacy in Quebec. CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in the number of texts, recommendations and criteria applicable to the practice of hospital pharmacy in Quebec. Compliance with this legal and normative framework appears to be a considerable challenge for hospital pharmacists. It seems worthwhile to further promote discussion with text-issuing agencies in order to keep the search for compliance realistic.


Subject(s)
Legislation, Drug , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Utilization/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Legislation, Drug/trends , Medication Systems, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Professional Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Quebec , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Med Syst ; 40(12): 278, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27787781

ABSTRACT

To review current practices regarding prescribing controlled substances at an academic medical center and describe possible advantages of electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS). A 10-question multiple choice survey was sent electronically to all house staff at an academic medical center. Aggregated data was analyzed for trends. 193 surveys (18.8 %) were completed. Of all respondents, 46.6 % were not able to write their own prescriptions. 70.0 % have used another provider's prescription pad to write prescriptions. 53.4 % have had prescriptions rejected or not filled by a pharmacy for being written incorrectly. 59.6 % kept a patient as an inpatient for a longer period of time due to the inability to obtain a prescription, costing an estimated $3.28 million per year. 58.0 % needed to have a patient return to the hospital to pick up prescriptions for an estimated 1583 return trips to the hospital yearly. 35.1 % had a patient return to the emergency department due to uncontrolled pain, estimated at $139,000 in yearly emergency department patient charges. The authors' survey highlights some of the financial, legal, efficiency, and satisfaction disadvantages due to the inability to use EPCS. Implementing EPCS and making it ubiquitous may limit some inefficiencies in academic hospital systems.


Subject(s)
Controlled Substances/administration & dosage , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Legislation, Drug , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/economics , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Electronic Prescribing/economics , Humans , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
5.
Int J Health Serv ; 43(1): 91-103, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527456

ABSTRACT

The objective of this article is to investigate whether the Chinese government's pricing policies have reduced pharmaceutical expenses. The purchasing records for systemic antibacterial drugs of 12 hospitals in Beijing from 1996 to 2005 were analyzed by separating the expenditure growth into three components: the price change, the volume change, and the structure change. Our results reveal that the structure change is the dominant determinant of drug expenditure growth. Despite lowered prices, the antibacterial drug expenditure was raised because more expensive drugs in the same therapeutic category were prescribed. It is insufficient to rely only on pricing policies to reduce drug expenses, given that physicians could circumvent the policy by prescribing more expensive drugs. In addition, physician behaviors need to be regulated to eliminate unnecessary overprescribing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Drug Costs/standards , Inappropriate Prescribing/economics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , China , Cost Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Control/methods , Drug Costs/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Costs/trends , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Financing, Government/standards , Financing, Government/trends , Government Regulation , Health Expenditures , Health Policy/economics , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/legislation & jurisprudence , Inappropriate Prescribing/trends , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards
6.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 154 Suppl 3: 59-67, 2012 Oct 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23133880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Today medication gaps are inevitable at discharge from the hospital and patients are insufficiently educated about their medication. METHODS: The rate of medication gaps and extent and quality of medication counseling were investigated in a prospective comparative study at five different hospitals. In a consecutive manner 847 patients were observed using current practice and 618 patients with a hospital pharmacist involved. Perception of patients, their general practitioners (GP) and community pharmacists with the different discharge procedures was analyzed by meansof questionnaires. RESULTS: Using current practice 24% of patients missed newly prescribed drugs at discharge. Medication gaps occurred according to patients'or GPs'reports in 10% or 22% of patients, respectively. 12% of patients were neither educated in the hospital nor in private setting about their medication. 22% of patients were not or only partially satisfied with the information received. Patient education, supported by a medication schedule and distribution of discharge medication by hospital pharmacists proved to be feasible and beneficial for patients and GPs. Medication gaps were significantly reduced to 4%. All patients received medication counseling at discharge and quality of education significantlyimproved. CONCLUSION: Distribution of discharge medication and counseling of patients bya hospital pharmacist are suitable measures in order to bridge medication and information gaps. Changes in healthcare legislation are necessary in order to implement the hospital pharmacy service.


Subject(s)
General Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Discharge/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Education as Topic , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Prescriptions , Referral and Consultation/legislation & jurisprudence , Cohort Studies , Cooperative Behavior , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication
8.
Farm Hosp ; 44(7): 24-27, 2020 06 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32533665

ABSTRACT

Type 2 coronavirus pandemics that is plaguing almost all the world has caused  qualitative and quantitative strains in health systems that have had to be responded to. The lack of known vaccines and effective treatments has generated the need to  use drugs with very little evidence for their incorporation into pharmacotherapeutic  protocols agreed by the clinical team. The hospital pharmacist, within the  multidisciplinary team, has been responsible for critically evaluating the alternatives and positioning them in these protocols. Finally, some ethical and legal questions  that should be considered in this scenario are analyzed in this article.


La pandemia por coronavirus tipo 2 que está azotando prácticamente todo el mundo ha provocado en los sistemas sanitarios tensiones cualitativas y cuantitativas a las  que ha habido que dar respuesta. La inexistencia de vacunas y de tratamientos  eficaces conocidos ha generado la necesidad de utilizar fármacos con muy escasa  evidencia para su incorporación en protocolos farmacoterapéuticos consensuados  por el equipo clínico. El farmacéutico de hospital, dentro del equipo multidisciplinar,  ha sido en muchas ocasiones el responsable de evaluar críticamente las alternativas para su posicionamiento en estos protocolos. Se analizan en el presente artículo algunas cuestiones éticas y legales que deben ser consideradas en este  escenario.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Evidence-Based Medicine , Pandemics , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Clinical Protocols , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Drug Therapy/standards , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Off-Label Use/ethics , Off-Label Use/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Care Team , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Propaganda , Role , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
9.
Farm Hosp ; 44(7): 57-60, 2020 06 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32533673

ABSTRACT

On the 20th of March 2020, triggered by the public health emergency declared,  the Health Authorities in Madrid reported a legal instruction (Orden 371/2020)  indicating the organization of a provisional hospital to admit patients with  COVID-19 at the Trade Fair Institution (IFEMA). Several pharmacists working in  the Pharmacy and Medical Devices Department of the Madrid Regional Health  Service were called to manage the Pharmacy Department of the  abovementioned hospital. Required permissions to set up a PD were here  authorized urgently. Tackling human and material resources, and computer  systems for drug purchase and electronic prescription, were some of the initial  issues that hindered the pharmaceutical provision required for patients from the  very day one. Once the purchase was assured, mainly by direct purchase from suppliers, drug dispensing up to 1,250 hospitalized patients (25 nursing units) and 8 ICU patients was taken on. Dispensing was carried out  through either drug stocks in the nursing units or individual patient dispensing  for certain drugs. Moreover, safety issues related to prescription were  considered, and as the electronic prescription was implemented we attained  100% prescriptions review and validation. The constitution of a multidisciplinary  Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee let agree to a pharmacotherapy guide,  pres cription protocols, therapeutic equivalences, interactions, and drug  dispensing circuits. The Pharmacy Department strategy was to ensure a very  quick response to basic tasks keeping the aim to offer a pharmaceutical care of  the highest quality whenever possible. Working under a health emergency  situation, with many uncertainties and continuous pressure was a plight.  However, the spirit of collaboration in and out of the Pharmacy Department was  aligned with the whole hospital motivation to offer the highest quality of  healthcare. These were possibly the keys to allow caring for almost 4,000  patients during the 42 days that the hospital lasted.


El día 20 de marzo de 2020 la Consejería de Sanidad publicó una Orden  (371/2020) para la apertura de un centro hospitalario provisional para atender a  pacientes COVID-19 en la Institución Ferial de Madrid (IFEMA), por razón de  emergencia sanitaria. Se dispuso un equipo de farmacéuticos de la Subdirección  General de Farmacia y Productos Sanitarios para la apertura de un Servicio de  Farmacia, que obtuvo la autorización correspondiente por el órgano competente, con carácter de urgencia. La gestión de recursos humanos,  materiales y de herramientas informáticas para la adquisición y prescripción  electrónica fueron unas de las primeras dificultades que se solaparon con el  primer reto de garantizar la prestación farmacéutica a los pacientes que atendía  el hospital desde el mismo día uno. Asegurada la adquisición, fundamentalmente  mediante la compra directa a proveedores, se planteó la  dispensación para un máximo de 1.250 pacientes de hospitalización (25  controles de enfermería) y una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de 8 pacientes;  se establecieron botiquines en las unidades de enfermería y circuitos  individualizados de dispensación para determinados medicamentos. A su vez,  desde el primer momento se trabajó en la seguridad en la prescripción, llegando  a la revisión y validación del 100% de los tratamientos, una vez instaurada la  prescripción electrónica. La creación de una  Comisión de Farmacia y Terapéutica multidisciplinar permitió consensuar la guía farmacoterapéutica, protocolos de  prescripción, equivalencias terapéuticas, interacciones y circuitos de  dispensación de medicamentos. La estrategia del Servicio de Farmacia se basó  en asegurar una respuesta rápida en las funciones básicas, sin perder la visión  de incorporar una atención farmacéutica de la máxima calidad posible a medida  que iba siendo factible. A pesar de un escenario adverso, de incertidumbre y  presión continuas por la emergencia sanitaria, se ha mantenido un espíritu de  colaboración y contribución dentro y fuera del Servicio de Farmacia, alineado con un objetivo común de trabajo en equipo para brindar una atención sanitaria rápida y de la mayor calidad posible. Posiblemente éstas han sido las claves del  éxito que han permitido atender a casi 4.000 pacientes en los 42 días de vida  del hospital.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Models, Theoretical , Pandemics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Electronic Prescribing/standards , Facility Regulation and Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Forecasting , Health Facility Planning , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Urban/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Safety , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain
10.
Farm Hosp ; 33(5): 281-4, 2009.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19775578

ABSTRACT

The call for public funding for the Spanish Health Care System clinical research with drugs for human use projects Subprogramme highlights the need for hospital pharmacy services to include the manufacture of investigational drugs which are the subject of a clinical trial, developed by either a researcher or a group of researchers, within its activities. This article discusses the legislation concerning the manufacture of investigational drugs and the requirements that the pharmacy services must meet in order to develop, distribute, or conceal an investigational drug in a clinical trial sponsored by a professional from the SHS.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Spain
11.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 67(6): 419-26, 2009 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19900606

ABSTRACT

Preparation of radiopharmaceuticals for injection involves compliance with the regulations for pharmaceutical drugs and radionuclides. The microbiological quality must be ensured, radiation exposure limited, and radioactive contamination of personnel and the environment prevented. Based on work concerning compliance and in accordance with changes in recent regulations, the facilities of the radiopharmacy department of the Louis Mourier Hospital have been optimized. Physical and microbiological controls of equipment and facilities have been implemented to monitor workstations and their environment with respect to microbiological quality. Three hygiene guidelines have also been implemented: improving hygiene practices, personal clothing, practical training on hygiene and its evaluation.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Hygiene/standards , Infection Control/methods , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Radiopharmaceuticals , Drug Compounding , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , France , Guideline Adherence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Hygiene/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Radioactive Pollutants
12.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(Supplement_3): S69-S73, 2019 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352489

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The implementation and maintenance of a process for adding and removing hyperlinks to medication management policies and guidelines approved by a pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee into the electronic health record (EHR) are described. SUMMARY: Medication management policies and guidelines approved by the P&T committee are published on the University of Utah Health intranet, making it possible to add hyperlinks to this information within the EHR. Adding these hyperlinks allows policy and guideline information to be available to clinicians on the medication ordering, verification, and administration screens without requiring a separate search of the intranet. In a quality-improvement project, all medication management policies and guidelines posted on the intranet were reviewed for relevance to the medication ordering, verification, and administration processes. Hyperlinks to relevant policies and guidelines were implemented into the EHR for specific medications. At the beginning of the review, 100 unique drugs associated with 1 or more hyperlinks were identified. The hyperlinks referenced a total of 33 Web documents: 8 policies and 25 guidelines. There are 74 medication management policies and 78 medication management guidelines approved by the P&T committee at University of Utah Health. After investigator review, 12 of 74 policies (16%) and 41 of 78 guidelines (53%) were deemed relevant during the medication ordering, verification, and administration processes. The review and hyperlink implementation process took a total of 101 hours. A continual review process was developed to enable addition and removal of hyperlinks as appropriate. CONCLUSION: Providing direct access to relevant medication management policies and guidelines approved by the P&T committee during the medication ordering, verification, and administration processes via hyperlinks in the EHR makes formulary information readily accessible by appropriate staff. These hyperlinks may also improve adherence to formulary information, reduce medication expenditure, and improve safety and therapeutic outcomes of medication therapy.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Internet-Based Intervention , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Drug and Narcotic Control , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Medical Order Entry Systems/organization & administration , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Therapy Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Medication Therapy Management/standards , Patient Safety , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Utah
13.
AAPS J ; 20(6): 101, 2018 09 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30209693

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional (3D) printing was discovered in the 1980s, and many industries have embraced it, but the pharmaceutical industry is slow or reluctant to adopt it. Spiritam® is the first and only 3D-printed drug product approved by FDA in 2015. Since then, the FDA has not approved any 3D-printed drug product due to technical and regulatory issues. The 3D printing process cannot compete with well-established and understood conventional processes for making solid dosage forms. However, pharmaceutical companies can utilize it where mass production is not required; rather, consistency, precision, and accuracy in quality are paramount. There are many 3D printing technologies available, and not all of them are amenable to pharmaceutical manufacturing. Each 3D technology has certain prerequisites in terms of material that it can handle. Some of the pertinent technical and regulatory issues are as follows: Current Good Manufacturing Practice, in-process tests and process control, and cleaning validation. Other promising area of 3D printing use is printing medications for patients with special needs in a hospital and/or pharmacy setting with minimum regulatory oversight. This technology provides a novel opportunity for in-hospital compounding of necessary medicines to support patient-specific medications. However, aspects of the manufacturing challenges and quality control considerations associated with the varying formulation and processing methods need to be fully understood before 3D printing can emerge as a therapeutic tool. With these points in mind, this review paper focuses on 3D technologies amenable for pharmaceutical manufacturing, excipient requirement, process understanding, and technical and regulatory challenges.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry/methods , Printing, Three-Dimensional/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Control , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry/standards , Excipients/chemistry , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/methods , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
Soc Sci Med ; 64(6): 1285-96, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161511

ABSTRACT

Although defining itself as a patient-centred profession, private sector (community and private hospital) pharmacy often appears to be that of a product-for-profit centred occupation. This perception has been at the core of the medical profession's attempts to reduce the professional autonomy of pharmacy, and has appeared at the forefront of the South African Department of Health's positioning of private sector pharmacy. Using as a starting point the debate surrounding attempts by the South African Minister of Health to regulate the price of medicines, I propose that the present negative positioning of private sector pharmacy in South Africa could be ameliorated by pharmacy practice that evidences a redefined understanding of professionalism.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Pharmacies/organization & administration , Pharmacy Administration/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Professional Practice/standards , Drug Costs/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Costs/trends , Fees, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees, Pharmaceutical/trends , Health Care Reform , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Pharmacies/economics , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Administration/trends , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Autonomy , Professional Practice/economics , Professional Practice/trends , Professional Role , South Africa
15.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 13(2): 265-71, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17378874

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: In May 2002, a centralized Unit for cytotoxic drug preparations [Unità Farmaci Antiblastici (UFA)] was established at the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy. The Unit was created following provisions under Law 626/94 (Legislative Decree - Ministry of Health), governing the safe handling of cytotoxic drugs. New guidelines governing drug preparation ('NBP' standards of preparation) published in Italian Pharmacopoeia (2002, XI Edition) have been mandatory since 2004 and set out rules for proper pharmacy practice applicable also to antineoplastic drug preparations. Aims and objectives To review legislation on cytotoxic drug preparation and compliance within our Unit, to assess current quality levels and identify those areas requiring improvement. METHODS: The study reviewed: (1) the organization and equipment of the Unit UFA and its working methodology; (2) written documentation concerning work procedures; (3) the stability and sterility of injectable drug formulations; (4) staff training, occupational exposure and risk management; (5) accidents and mistakes occurring in the UFA service. RESULTS: The study showed up the strengths of our Unit and identified those areas which need improvement to guarantee product quality excellence. CONCLUSIONS: A critical evaluation of the whole cytotoxic preparation process is a useful method for quality improvements to be initiated. Knowledge regarding risks, techniques, and procedures for handling antineoplastic drugs is growing. Ongoing analysis will ensure greater patient and health care worker safety.


Subject(s)
Cytotoxins , Drug Compounding/standards , Guideline Adherence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Italy , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration
17.
Indian Pediatr ; 54(9): 739-741, 2017 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28984251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of initiating antibiotic policy on antibiotic consumption in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between January, 2013 and December, 2014 in a 30 bed NICU. The antibiotic policy for neonatal sepsis was initiated on January 1st, 2014. The overall antibiotic consumption (Daily Defined Dose [DDD] per 100 patient-days), one year before and one year after the initiation of antibiotic policy was evaluated using interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant change (12.47 vs. 11.47 DDD/100 patient-days; P = 0.57) in overall antibiotic consumption. A significant increase in the proportion of patients on first-line agents (ampicillin and gentamicin) (66% (n=449) vs. 84% (n=491); P <0.001) and significant decrease in consumption of third generation cephalosporins (1.45 vs. 0.45 DDD/100 patient-days; P =0.002) was observed. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic policy increased the use of first-line agents and decreased the consumption of third generation cephalosporins.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Sepsis/drug therapy , Neonatal Sepsis/epidemiology , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Retrospective Studies
18.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 13(4): 778-788, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A number of policy and labeling interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate prescribing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were implemented in the U.S. between 2006 and 2010. These interventions included the addition of an FDA Black Box Warning to ESA labeling, the implementation of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, and the adoption of payment restrictions by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The impact of these safety interventions on different types of ESA prescribing (on-label, off-label; evidence-based, not evidence-based) has not been investigated in a single study. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore the prescribing patterns of ESAs for on- and off-label indications in the U.S. hospital inpatients during the period of major policy and labeling changes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ESAs utilization patterns was conducted using Cerner Health Facts® database from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2011. The study population consisted of adult patients admitted to hospitals during the study period who received at least one ESAs order. Indications for ESA use were assigned based on ICD-9 CM diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and medication records. ESA use was then classified based on FDA-approval and the strength of scientific evidence supporting its use. Indication categories included (1) on-label use (ONS); (2) off-label use, supported (OFS); and (3) off-label use, unsupported (OFU). Descriptive statistics were used to examine ESA use by patient, hospital, and physician characteristics and over time. RESULTS: ESAs were most frequently prescribed for ONS (48.7%), followed by OFU (42.7%) and OFS indications (8.6%). Of all off-label use, 83.2% were for unsupported indications. Between 2005 and 2010, the percent of inpatient visits with ESA use decreased for supported indications, both on-label (-63.2%) and off-label (-78.2%), but increased for unsupported indications (80%). OFU use surpassed ONS use as the most common type of ESA use in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Total and ONS ESA use decreased markedly, while OFU ESA use continued to increase during the period of major policy and labeling changes.


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control/trends , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Inappropriate Prescribing/trends , Inpatients , Off-Label Use , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/trends , Policy Making , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Drug Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Labeling/trends , Drug and Narcotic Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Hematinics/adverse effects , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/legislation & jurisprudence , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Inpatients/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Middle Aged , Off-Label Use/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/legislation & jurisprudence , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , United States , Young Adult
19.
Recenti Prog Med ; 107(1): 19-24, 2016 Jan.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901366

ABSTRACT

This study proposes an analysis of the boundaries of liability of the negligent hospital pharmacist, in relation with the liability of the hospital. The conditions of departure are: the knowledge that the pharmacist works within the limits of compliance programs adopted by the hospital; the finding that, in recent times, there has been an expansion in the objective sense of liability of the pharmacist. The laudable aim of protecting the patient is well accompanied by the violation of the principle of individual criminal liability (Art. 27 of the Constitution) and practical reason for discouraging the risky assets even useful. Through the analysis of the d. lgs. n. 231/2001 regarding the corporate liability for the crime and law n. 158/2012 regarding criminal liability limited to the gross negligence of the health care, it will arrive at the conclusion about the need to recognize a liability for the organization to hospitals, limiting the liability of the hospital pharmacist to cases of chargeability/criminal liability of negligent conduct.


Subject(s)
Liability, Legal , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals/standards , Humans , Legislation, Hospital , Malpractice , Pharmacists/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards
20.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 73(16): 1250-3, 2016 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354037

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: One hospital's experience with procuring i.v. fosfomycin via an expanded-access protocol to treat a panresistant infection is described. SUMMARY: In mid-2014, a patient at a tertiary care institution had an infection caused by a gram-negative pathogen expressing notable drug resistance. Once it was determined by the infectious diseases (ID) attending physician that i.v. fosfomycin was a possible treatment for this patient, the ID pharmacist began the process of drug procurement. The research and ID pharmacists completed an investigational new drug (IND) application, which required patient-specific details and contributions from the ID physician. After obtaining approval of the IND, an Internet search identified a product vendor in the United Kingdom, who was then contacted to begin the drug purchasing and acquisition processes. Authorization of the transaction required signatures from key senior hospital administrators, including the chief financial officer and the chief operating officer. Approximately 6 days after beginning the acquisition process, the research pharmacist arranged for the wholesaler to expedite product delivery. The ID pharmacist contacted the wholesaler's shipping company at the U.S. Customs Office, providing relevant contact information to ensure that any unexpected circumstances could be quickly addressed. The product arrived at the U.S. Customs Office 8 days after beginning the acquisition process and was held in the U.S. Customs Office for 2 days. The patient received the first dose of i.v. fosfomycin 13 days after starting the expanded-access protocol process. CONCLUSION: I.V. fosfomycin was successfully procured through an FDA expanded-access protocol by coordinating efforts among ID physicians, pharmacists, and hospital executives.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Compassionate Use Trials/methods , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Drugs, Investigational/administration & dosage , Fosfomycin/administration & dosage , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Compassionate Use Trials/legislation & jurisprudence , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Investigational New Drug Application/legislation & jurisprudence , Investigational New Drug Application/methods , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/methods , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL