Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 126
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Radiol Med ; 124(8): 728-735, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919221

ABSTRACT

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article was to explore the implications of the new Euratom dose limit for occupational radiation protection in the context of medical occupational radiation exposures. The European Directive 2013/59/Euratom takes into account the new recommendations on reduction in the dose limit for the lens of the eye for planned occupational exposures released in 2012 by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP 118). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different dose-monitoring procedures and devices were considered. Occupational eye lens doses reported by previous studies were analyzed, mainly considering workers involved in interventional procedures with X-rays. The current status of eye lens radiation protection and the main methods for dose reduction were investigated. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the workers, potentially exceeding the new limit, are clinical staff performing interventional procedures with a relatively high X-ray dose. Regarding radiological protection issues, the considered literature reports that the proper use of personal protective equipment may reduce the eye lens absorbed dose. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the occupational eye lens dose is essential to establish which method of personal dose monitoring should be preferred. Furthermore, education and training about the right use of personal protective equipment are important for medical staff working with ionizing radiation.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation, Ionizing
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(2): 455-469, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30794996

ABSTRACT

For the assessment of non-sinusoidal magnetic fields the European EMF Directive 2013/35/EU specified the Weighted Peak Method in Time Domain (WPM-TD) as the reference method. However, also other scientifically validated methods are allowed, provided that they lead to approximately equivalent and comparable results. In the non-binding guide for practical implementation of 2013/35/EU three methods alternative to the WPM-TD are described, i.e. the Weighted Peak Method in Frequency Domain (WPM-FD), the Multiple Frequency Rule (MFR), and an alternative Time Domain Assessment Method (TDAM). In this paper the results of a benchmark comparison of these assessment methods, based on 12 different time domain signals of magnetic induction, measured close to real devices and nine additional generic waveforms, are presented. The results demonstrated that assessments obtained with WPM-TD and WPM-FD can be considered approximately equivalent (maximum deviation 3.4 dB). The MFR systematically overestimates exposure, due to its inherently conservative definitions. In contrast, the TDAM significantly and systematically underestimates exposure up to a factor of 22 (26.8 dB) for the considered waveforms. The main reasons for this exposure underestimation by the TDAM are the introduction of an inappropriate time averaging, and the fact that the characteristic time parameter τ p,min, describing the minimum duration of all field changes dB/dt of the waveform is derived independently from the extent of the field change in the definitions of the TDAM. Consequently, we recommend not to use the TDAM as presently published in the non-binding guide to 2013/35/EU, as its application would be in contradiction with the underlying aim of 2013/35/EU, i.e. a harmonised level of occupational safety with respect to exposure to electromagnetic fields.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Electromagnetic Fields , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , European Union , Humans
3.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(1): 126-135, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523929

ABSTRACT

Following the proposal of the ICRP for the reduction of the dose limit for the lens of the eye, which has been adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Council, concerns have been raised about the implementation of proper dose monitoring methods as defined in national regulations, and about the harmonisation between European countries. The European Radiation Dosimetry Group organised a survey at the end of 2017, through a web questionnaire, regarding national dose monitoring regulations. The questions were related to: double dosimetry, algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose, methodology for the determination of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye and structure of the national dose registry. The results showed that more than 50% of the countries that responded to the survey have legal requirements about the number and the position of dosemeters used for estimation of the effective dose when radiation protection garments are used. However, in only five out of 26 countries are there nationally approved algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose. In 14 out of 26 countries there is a legal requirement to estimate the dose to the lens of the eye. All of the responding countries use some kind of national database for storing individual monitoring data but in only 12 out of 26 countries are the estimated effective dose values stored. The personal dose equivalent at depth 3 mm is stored in the registry of only seven out of 26 countries. From the survey, performed just before the implementation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive, it is concluded that national occupational exposure frameworks require intensive and immediate work under the coordination of the competent authorities to bring them into line with the latest basic safety standards and achieve harmonisation between European countries.


Subject(s)
Protective Clothing/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Europe , Humans , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 13(10): D166-74, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310266

ABSTRACT

With respect to radiation protection for decontamination efforts involving radioactive fallout emitted by the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Atomic Power Plant, new regulations were established and obligated employers to monitor, record, and store of workers' dose records, and to check their past dose records at the time of employment. However, cumulative doses may not be properly maintained if a worker declares incorrect values for past doses. In response, with facilitation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, primary contractors of decontamination works decided to establish a central dose registration system. There are four major issues in the design of the system to be resolved, included the following: primary contractors (a) do not have a legal responsibility to perform dose control for subcontractors, (b) do not have the right to control decontamination sites, (c) often organize joint ventures, and (d) correspond to a wide range of ambient dose rates. To resolve the issues, requirements of the system included the following: (a) centralize the operation of radiation passbooks, which records past doses and the results of medical examinations to each worker; (b) develop a database system that could register all dose data and accept inquiry from primary contractors; (c) establish a permanent data storage system for transferred records; and (d) provide graded type of services that are appropriate to the risk of radiation exposure. The system started its operation in December 2013 and provided dose distributions in April and July 2015. The average yearly dose in 2014 was 0.7 mSv, which increased by 0.2 mSv from 0.5 mSv in 2012 and 2013. However, no cumulative dose from 2012-2014 exceeded 20 mSv, which was far below than the dose limits (100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv/year). Although current dose distributions of decontamination workers were within appropriate levels, careful monitoring of dose distribution is necessary for preserving the proper implementation of radiation protection prescribed in the regulations.


Subject(s)
Decontamination , Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Databases, Factual , Humans , Japan , Nuclear Power Plants/standards
5.
J Radiol Prot ; 35(3): 571-96, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26160861

ABSTRACT

In compliance with the fundamentals of the government's policy in the field of nuclear and radiation safety approved by the President of the Russian Federation, Russia has developed a national program for decommissioning of its nuclear legacy. Under this program, the State Atomic Energy Corporation 'Rosatom' is carrying out remediation of a Site for Temporary Storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive waste (RW) at Andreeva Bay located in Northwest Russia. The short term plan includes implementation of the most critical stage of remediation, which involves the recovery of SNF from what have historically been poorly maintained storage facilities. SNF and RW are stored in non-standard conditions in tanks designed in some cases for other purposes. It is planned to transport recovered SNF to PA 'Mayak' in the southern Urals. This article analyses the current state of the radiation safety supervision of workers and the public in terms of the regulatory preparedness to implement effective supervision of radiation safety during radiation-hazardous operations. It presents the results of long-term radiation monitoring, which serve as informative indicators of the effectiveness of the site remediation and describes the evolving radiation situation. The state of radiation protection and health care service support for emergency preparedness is characterized by the need to further study the issues of the regulator-operator interactions to prevent and mitigate consequences of a radiological accident at the facility. Having in mind the continuing intensification of practical management activities related to SNF and RW in the whole of northwest Russia, it is reasonable to coordinate the activities of the supervision bodies within a strategic master plan. Arrangements for this master plan are discussed, including a proposed programme of actions to enhance the regulatory supervision in order to support accelerated mitigation of threats related to the nuclear legacy in the area.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Reactors/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/methods , Government Regulation , Humans , Industrial Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Russia , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
Voen Med Zh ; 335(12): 37-43, 2014 Dec.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25804083

ABSTRACT

More than 7.5 thousands of people work as military and civilian personnel and have an access to a lot of sources of ionizing radiation on ships and vessels, at coastal units and institutions of the Navy. This fact determines the importance of radiation safety and medical preventive measures on naval fleets. The article analyses the state of radiation-hygienic measures, outlines the conceptual basis for the development of radiation hygiene in the Navy. Substantiated reconstruction tasks effectiveness of health control and state sanitary and epidemiological supervision of radiation safety, provides information about the optimal set of instruments for radiation monitoring equipment radiobiological laboratories and centres of state sanitary and epidemiological supervision at various levels.


Subject(s)
Military Hygiene/methods , Naval Medicine , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiologic Health , Government Regulation , Military Hygiene/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Hygiene/organization & administration , Military Hygiene/standards , Military Personnel , Naval Medicine/organization & administration , Naval Medicine/standards , Naval Medicine/trends , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiologic Health/organization & administration , Radiologic Health/standards , Radiologic Health/trends , Russia , Safety , Ships
8.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (11): 11-5, 2014.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25845143

ABSTRACT

Hygienic evaluation of radiation situation in operation of mobile and stationery elements within a project of national system for instrumental supervision over nuclear materials and radioactive substances transport, created with a Global initiative against nuclear terrorism. Levels of exposure to ionizing radiation of the screening complexes appeared to match requirements on radiation safety for service personnel and general population.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Hazard Release/prevention & control , Safety Management , Transportation/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Hygiene/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Hazard Release/legislation & jurisprudence , Russia , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/organization & administration , Terrorism/legislation & jurisprudence , Terrorism/prevention & control
9.
Environ Sci Technol ; 47(3): 1248-56, 2013 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23253203

ABSTRACT

The Japanese government ordered the analysis of thousands of foods after the Fukushima nuclear accident to ascertain compliance with regulatory limits for anthropogenic radionuclides in food. Four hundred and forty-five samples obtained until 31 December 2011 from 11 prefectures exceeded the regulatory limits that were in force until 31 March 2012. The possibility of these 445 samples representing localized areas of high radiocesium concentration was investigated. The objective of this study was to determine the radiocesium activity ratio ((134)Cs/(137)Cs) in foods from each geographic area to possibly identify the radioactive signature of the four different reactors (i.e., four independent sources) in the distinct regions. The average (134)Cs/(137)Cs activity ratio was 0.98 ± 0.01 for all samples. However, no statistically significant deviations from this value could be confirmed in the various regions. Therefore, we conclude that the releases from reactor No. 4 (carrying a significantly smaller activity ratio) are assumed to be small when compared with the other three reactor releases. The individual radioisotopic signatures of reactors No. 1, 2, and 3 could not be identified in various Japanese regions using the food samples, indicating integral radiocesium contamination from these sources. Subsequent releases of fission products from the reactors (e.g., after possible criticalities reported in October 2011) proved to have no impact on the radiocesium activity ratio. A discussion of the development of the regulatory limits in Japan and Europe with regard to the current limits and radiological food safety are also included.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Environment , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Contamination/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Activities , Legislation as Topic , Radioisotopes/analysis , Cesium Radioisotopes/analysis , European Union , Food Safety , Humans , Japan , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Control, Formal , Time Factors
10.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) ; 67: 1391-6, 2013 Dec 31.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24493688

ABSTRACT

Exposure of both patients and medical staff to relatively high doses of radiation is one of the features characteristic of interventional radiology (IR). Regulations regarding this kind of therapeutic management can be found in many legal references and recommendations of European Union Law. The purpose of the paper is collection and systematic analysis of activities and procedures associated with the question of radiation hygiene which should be observed in IR suites. Requirements regarding equipment of the IR suite, as well as radiation protection of patients and medical staff, constitute main questions included in the paper, worked out on the basis of valid regulations and occupational experience of the authors. Particular attention is paid to borderline requirements regarding modern IR suite equipment and its organization. Part of the paper is devoted to the understanding of physical laws of ionizing radiation in biological space and its surroundings. Understanding of physical laws, proper utilization of IR suite equipment, and strict compliance with recommendations of radiation protection by both patients and medical staff are critical for limitation of the harmful influence of radiation during interventional therapeutic procedures. An additional role of the paper is to make it easier to take decisions when creating new IR suites, in accordance with valid regulations and the rule of functionality.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional/methods , European Union , Humans , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards
11.
J Radiol Prot ; 33(3): 605-20, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23803560

ABSTRACT

Identifying radon-prone areas is key to policies on the control of this environmental carcinogen. In the current paper, we present the methodology followed to delineate radon-prone areas in Spain. It combines information from indoor radon measurements with γ-radiation and geological maps. The advantage of the proposed approach is that it lessens the requirement for a high density of measurements by making use of commonly available information. It can be applied for an initial definition of radon-prone areas in countries committed to introducing a national radon policy or to improving existing radon maps in low population regions.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radon/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Data Collection , Gamma Rays , Geographic Mapping , Geology/methods , Humans , Linear Models , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radon/adverse effects , Spain
12.
J Radiol Prot ; 33(3): 497-571, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23803462

ABSTRACT

Following the Fukushima accident, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) convened a task group to compile lessons learned from the nuclear reactor accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, with respect to the ICRP system of radiological protection. In this memorandum the members of the task group express their personal views on issues arising during and after the accident, without explicit endorsement of or approval by the ICRP. While the affected people were largely protected against radiation exposure and no one incurred a lethal dose of radiation (or a dose sufficiently large to cause radiation sickness), many radiological protection questions were raised. The following issues were identified: inferring radiation risks (and the misunderstanding of nominal risk coefficients); attributing radiation effects from low dose exposures; quantifying radiation exposure; assessing the importance of internal exposures; managing emergency crises; protecting rescuers and volunteers; responding with medical aid; justifying necessary but disruptive protective actions; transiting from an emergency to an existing situation; rehabilitating evacuated areas; restricting individual doses of members of the public; caring for infants and children; categorising public exposures due to an accident; considering pregnant women and their foetuses and embryos; monitoring public protection; dealing with 'contamination' of territories, rubble and residues and consumer products; recognising the importance of psychological consequences; and fostering the sharing of information. Relevant ICRP Recommendations were scrutinised, lessons were collected and suggestions were compiled. It was concluded that the radiological protection community has an ethical duty to learn from the lessons of Fukushima and resolve any identified challenges. Before another large accident occurs, it should be ensured that inter alia: radiation risk coefficients of potential health effects are properly interpreted; the limitations of epidemiological studies for attributing radiation effects following low exposures are understood; any confusion on protection quantities and units is resolved; the potential hazard from the intake of radionuclides into the body is elucidated; rescuers and volunteers are protected with an ad hoc system; clear recommendations on crisis management and medical care and on recovery and rehabilitation are available; recommendations on public protection levels (including infant, children and pregnant women and their expected offspring) and associated issues are consistent and understandable; updated recommendations on public monitoring policy are available; acceptable (or tolerable) 'contamination' levels are clearly stated and defined; strategies for mitigating the serious psychological consequences arising from radiological accidents are sought; and, last but not least, failures in fostering information sharing on radiological protection policy after an accident need to be addressed with recommendations to minimise such lapses in communication.


Subject(s)
Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Radioactive Fallout/statistics & numerical data , Child , Earthquakes/mortality , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Japan/epidemiology , Nuclear Power Plants , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Rescue Work , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
13.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 35(1): 26-31, 2013.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23798231

ABSTRACT

The recent postponement until 31 October 2013 of the deadline for transposition of the EU Directive 2004/40/EC, concerning the minimum health requirementsfor the exposure of workers to the risks arising from electromagnetic fields between 0 and 300 GHz, keeps on suspending the Italian law which was aimed to implement the EU regulations on the occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields, including those generated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) units. Waiting for the revision of the exposure limits proposed by the EU Directive taking into account results from new studies and evolution of knowledge, the time-weighted values of static magnetic field proposed by the Italian Ministry of Health (D.M 02/08/91) still survive as limits for worker's exposure. The comparison between the proposed thresholds and the time required to position patients allows to calculate how long the MRI staff can stay at different values of static magnetic field, i.e. the maximum workload of each worker. In order to evaluate more accurately how many time the members of MRI staff are near the magnet bore and the real value of worker's exposure to the static magnetic field during the handling of patients, a teslameter Metrolab THM1176-PDA was used. Personal exposure measurements on the radiologists and the radiographers who worked on a 3 T GE Healthcare Discovery 750 MR were carried out during the positioning of self-sufficient and collaborative patients. The sensor was worn at the chest level on the side that was nearest to the magnet bore. Results show wide variations occurring between individual working procedures concerning the handling of patients, especially during the initial position phase. The mean values of the time spent by radiographers inside the magnet room (B > 0.5 mT) to place the patient and to take him outside at the end of the exam were respectively 220 and 127 seconds. The mean value of the time spent by radiologists was 162 seconds when they had to insert a peripheral vein access (arm) and inject contrast medium. The time fraction spent in magnetic flux density above 200 mT was near 31% for radiographers and about 7% for radiologists. The maximum of the static magnetic field recorded was 1550 mT for radiographers and 409 mT for radiologists. The measuring system has proven to be useful in evaluating the compliance with time weighted exposure limit stated by Italian law and also to find the maximum magnetic flux density to which the staff is actually exposed. This is the quantity of significance in evaluating workers' exposure following international guidelines.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , European Union , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Italy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Time Factors
14.
Med Pr ; 64(5): 671-80, 2013.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24502130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The activities of rescue and uniformed services require the use of wireless communication devices, such as portable radiophones. Assessment of workers' exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by radiophones is important in view of occupational safety and health (OSH), legislation requirements and reports on possible adverse health effects in users of devices emitting radiofrequency electromagnetic field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 50 portable radiophones of conventional and trunked communication systems were investigated. The assessment of electromagnetic hazards to users involved unperturbed electromagnetic field measurements near radiophones' antennas. RESULTS: The electric field strength corresponding to the occupational exposure level (fields of so-called safety zones established by OSH legislation in Poland) was measured at a distance of 45-65 cm from the portable radiophones antennas of conventional system and 75-95 cm from antennas of trunked system radiophones, depending on their type and mode of work. The assessment was based on the averaged results of series of measurements. The electric field strength exceeding action levels defined by Directive 2013/35/EU was found up to 15 cm from radiophone antennas of conventional system and up to 10 cm from the antennas of trunked system radiophones. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the range of safety zones and the use of portable radiophones near the body, their users should be classified into the group of workers occupationally exposed to electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic field measurement results and typical conditions of using portable radiophones justify the need for additional assessment of electromagnetic hazards--the analysis of compliance with relevant exposure limit values provided by Directive 2013/35/EU.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Europe , Humans , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Poland
15.
Gig Sanit ; (3): 15-9, 2013.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24340572

ABSTRACT

Activities related to the rehabilitation of areas and facilities of the temporary storage of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste (SNF and RW) at Andreeva Bay and Gremikha on the Kola Peninsula and in the Primorsky Krai in the Russian Far East is an important component of the regulatory functions of the Federal Medical biological Agency (FMBA of Russia). Technical support to the FMBA of Russia in this activity is provided by A.L Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center Main research interests include evaluation of radiological threats to determine the priority directions of regulation, a detailed analysis of the radiation situation at areas, territories and in vicinity of temporary waste storage facilities, radiation control and environmental monitoring, the development of digital maps and geoinformation systems, project expertise in the field of rehabilitation of PVC including the management of SNF and RW Implementation of these natural, practical and theoretical works is completed by development a set of regulatory documents ensuring adherence to radiation safety for the stuff population and the environment, and the also documents governing the management of SNF and RW waste in the territories of PVC.


Subject(s)
Military Facilities/standards , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Waste , Government Regulation , Military Hygiene , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/analysis , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/prevention & control , Russia
17.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 162(3-4): 55-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22476593

ABSTRACT

This article presents the Austrian system of emergency preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergency situations. It demonstrates, in particular, the legal basis, the roles and competencies of the competent authorities, international and bilateral conventions on early notification of nuclear accidents, the Austrian emergency plans, the Austrian radiation monitoring system, the operated prognosis and decision support systems and the results of an estimation of possible impacts of nuclear power plant disasters on Austria.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Emergencies , Radioactive Hazard Release/legislation & jurisprudence , Austria , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , International Cooperation , Nuclear Power Plants , Nuclear Warfare , Prognosis , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Hazard Release/prevention & control
18.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (8): 8-12, 2012.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23088018

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a modification of the basic directions of state accounting and control of radioactive substances and radioactive waste products, whose implementation will significantly improve the efficiency of its operation at the regional level. Selected areas are designed to improve accounting and control system for the submission of the enterprises established by the reporting forms, the quality of the information contained in them, as well as structures of information and process for collecting, analyzing and data processing concerning radioactive substances and waste products.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Russia , Waste Management/methods , Waste Management/standards
19.
Med Tr Prom Ekol ; (10): 44-8, 2012.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23210184

ABSTRACT

Analysis of the requirements of Federal Law N 190 "About radioactive waste management and incorporation of changes into some legislative acts of the Russian Federation", as well as normative-legislative documents actual and planned to be published related to provision of radiation protection of the workers and the public have been done. Problems of safety regulation raised due to different approaches of Rospotrebnadzor, FMBA of Russia, Rostekhnadzor and Minprirody with respect to classification and categorization of the radioactive wastes, disposal, exemption from regulatory control, etc. have been discussed in the paper. Proposals regarding improvement of the system of safety regulation under radioactive waste management and of cooperation of various regulatory bodies have been formulated.


Subject(s)
Environmental Restoration and Remediation , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radioactive Waste , Waste Management , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Government Regulation , Humans , Industrial Waste/adverse effects , Industrial Waste/prevention & control , Radioactive Waste/classification , Radioactive Waste/prevention & control , Russia , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/methods , Waste Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Waste Management/methods
20.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1126): 20210547, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34433005

ABSTRACT

The Internal Dosimetry User Group (IDUG) is an independent, non-profit group of medical professionals dedicated to the promotion of dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy (www.IDUG.org.uk). The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017, IR(ME)R, stipulate a requirement for optimisation and verification of molecular radiotherapy treatments, ensuring doses to non-target organs are as low as reasonably practicable. For many molecular radiotherapy treatments currently undertaken within the UK, this requirement is not being fully met. The growth of this field is such that we risk digressing further from IR(ME)R compliance potentially delivering suboptimal therapies that are not in the best interest of our patients. For this purpose, IDUG proposes ten points of action to aid in the successful implementation of this legislation. We urge stakeholders to support these proposals and ensure national provision is sufficient to meet the criteria necessary for compliance, and for the future advancement of molecular radiotherapy within the UK.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Oncology/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/standards , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Organs at Risk , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiotherapy Dosage , Societies, Medical , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL