Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT compared to standard skeletal survey for detecting bone destruction in smouldering multiple myeloma: time to move forward.

Skeletal survey (SS) continues to be used in the community to detect bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While the false-negative rate is high, the specificity of SS is less well characterised. Here, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of SS compared to 18 F-FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) in 79 patients referred to our tertiary centre with a diagnosis of smouldering MM. SS had a specificity of 83·1% (95% confidence interval: 72·0-90·5%). This study reinforces the importance of using more specific imaging techniques to avoid inaccurate diagnosis that could lead to the risks associated with unnecessary therapy in patients with smouldering MM.

Machine learning for image-based detection of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an exploratory study.

PURPOSE: In 2-dimensional lateral cephalometric radiographs, patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) exhibit a more crowded oropharynx in comparison with non-OSA. We tested the hypothesis that machine learning, an application of artificial intelligence (AI), could be used to detect patients with severe OSA based on 2-dimensional images. METHODS: A deep convolutional neural network was developed (n = 1258; 90%) and tested (n = 131; 10%) using data from 1389 (100%) lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained from individuals diagnosed with severe OSA (n = 867; apnea hypopnea index > 30 events/h sleep) or non-OSA (n = 522; apnea hypopnea index < 5 events/h sleep) at a single center for sleep disorders. Three kinds of data sets were prepared by changing the area of interest using a single image: the original image without any modification (full image), an image containing a facial profile, upper airway, and craniofacial soft/hard tissues (main region), and an image containing part of the occipital region (head only). A radiologist also performed a conventional manual cephalometric analysis of the full image for comparison. RESULTS: The sensitivity/specificity was 0.87/0.82 for full image, 0.88/0.75 for main region, 0.71/0.63 for head only, and 0.54/0.80 for the manual analysis. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was the highest for main region 0.92, for full image 0.89, for head only 0.70, and for manual cephalometric analysis 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: A deep convolutional neural network identified individuals with severe OSA with high accuracy. Future research on this concept using AI and images can be further encouraged when discussing triage of OSA.

Rates and clinical impact of discordant X-ray and CT imaging in transfers to a pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Children are often transferred to a Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) for definitive care after completion of diagnostic imaging. There is a paucity of data on the concordance rates of interpretation of imaging studies between referral and PED. Our objective is to describe the rates and clinical impact of discordant interpretation of X-rays and CT in children transferred to a PED. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients over a 12-month period from 12/1/2017-11/30/2018 with X-ray (XR) and CT performed prior to transfer to our PED. We compared referral radiology interpretations to those of pediatric radiologists to determine concordance. Encounters with discordant imaging interpretations were further evaluated for clinical impact (none, minor or major) based on need for additional laboratory workup, consultation, and changes in management and disposition. RESULTS: We analyzed 899 patient encounters. There were high rates of concordance in both XR and CT interpretation (668/743; 89.9%, 95% CI 0.87-0.91 and 205/235; 87.2%, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, respectively). XR discordance resulted in minor clinical impact in 34 patients (45%, 95% CI 0.35-0.57) and a major clinical impact in 28 patients (37%, 95% CI 0.27-0.49). CT discordance resulted in minor clinical impact in 10 patients (33%, 95% CI 0.19-0.51) of patients and major clinical impact in 15 patients (50%, 95% CI 0.33-0.67). The most common discordances with major clinical impact were related to pneumonia on XR chest and appendicitis or inflammatory bowel disease on CT abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: In patients transferred to the PED, concordance of XR and CT interpretations was high. A majority of discordant interpretations led to clinical impact meaningful to the patient and emergency medicine (EM) physician. Referring EM physicians might consider the benefit of pediatric radiology consultation upon transfer, especially for imaging diagnoses related to pneumonia, appendicitis, or inflammatory bowel disease.

Diagnostic Imaging: Appropriate and Safe Use.

The use of diagnostic radiography has doubled in the past two decades. Image Gently (children) and Image Wisely (adults) are multidisciplinary initiatives that seek to reduce radiation exposure by eliminating unnecessary procedures and offering best practices. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL per minute per 1.73 m2 may have increased risk of nephropathy when exposed to iodinated contrast media and increased risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis when exposed to gadolinium-based contrast agents. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria can help guide specific diagnostic imaging choices. Noncontrast head computed tomography is the first-line modality when a stroke is suspected. Magnetic resonance imaging stroke protocols and computed tomography perfusion scans can augment evaluation and potentially expand pharmacologic and endovascular therapy timeframes. Imaging should be avoided in patients with uncomplicated headache syndromes unless the history or physical examination reveals red flag features. Cardiac computed tomography angiography, stress echocardiography, and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (nuclear stress test) are appropriate for patients with chest pain and low to intermediate cardiovascular risk and have comparable sensitivity and specificity. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography is the preferred test for high-risk patients or those with a positive d-dimer test result, and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is reserved for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL per minute per 1.73 m2 or a known contrast allergy. Computed tomography with intravenous contrast is preferred for evaluating adults with suspected appendicitis; however, ultrasonography should precede computed tomography in children, and definitive treatment should be initiated if positive. Ultrasonography is the first-line modality for assessing right upper quadrant pain suggestive of biliary disease. Mass size and patient age dictate surveillance recommendations for adnexal masses. Imaging should not be performed for acute (less than six weeks) low back pain unless red flag features are found on patient history. Ultrasonography should be used for the evaluation of suspicious thyroid nodules identified incidentally on computed tomography.

Benign and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast: Clinicopathologic analysis of 205 cases with emphasis on the surgical margin status and local recurrence rate.

BACKGROUND: The management of benign and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast with a positive surgical margin is still controversial. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical margin status on the local recurrence rate of benign and borderline phyllodes tumors. METHODS: We reviewed 205 phyllodes tumors (191 benign, 14 borderline) that were surgically excised at our hospital between 2005 and 2019. Follow-up information extending to at least 6 months after surgery was retrieved from the clinical, radiology, and pathology records. RESULTS: The initial surgical margin was negative in 54 (26%) cases, close (≤ 1 mm) in 29 (14%) cases, and positive in 122 (60%) cases. Approximately half of the cases with a close margin and two-third of the cases with a positive margin underwent re-excision to obtain negative margins. Three (2.3%) local recurrences were observed among 131 cases with follow-up information, all three with benign phyllodes tumor. Of these three patients, one had a positive final margin, and two had negative final margins. There was no significant difference in the rate of local recurrence between PT with a positive surgical margin versus a close and negative margin. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that close clinical and radiologic follow-up may provide a better course of management rather than re-excision when managing positive margins in benign and borderline phyllodes tumors.

Facilitating research amongst radiographers through information literacy workshops.

BACKGROUND: Despite a strong research presence in Lancashire Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (LTHTR), allied health professionals from the organization are underrepresented in developing and publicizing research that is inspired by day-to-day clinical practice and staff experiences. Two LTHTR departments, Library and Knowledge Services (LKS) and Research and Innovation (R&I), came together to enable a group of staff to develop the knowledge and skills that they needed to access information and create new "home grown" research. CASE PRESENTATION: A clinical librarian and an academic research nurse created a research engagement program in the diagnostic radiography department at LTHTR, which included the development, delivery, and evaluation of 6 workshops. Sixteen individuals took part in these workshops, and data were collected on library usage, self-efficacy in information literacy, and research output before and after their delivery. Library membership increased by 50% among diagnostic radiography staff, literature search requests from this department increased by 133%, and all participants who attended at least 1 workshop reported an increased Information Literacy Self Efficacy Scale (ILSES) score. An increase in research activity and outputs was also attributed to the program. CONCLUSIONS: This project has resulted in a set of freely available workshop plans and support resources that can be customized for other health care professionals and has won several awards for its innovative use of departmental collaboration. Through the evaluation of the program from workshop attendees and non-attenders, we have identified impacts, outputs, and barriers to engagement in order to continue to deliver this content to other departments and embed a home grown research culture at LTHTR.

Improving the accuracy of patient positioning for long-leg radiographs using a Taylor Spatial Frame mounted rotation rod.

INTRODUCTION: Long-leg radiographs are used to plan and supervise the correction of bone deformity in patients treated with the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF). Often radiographs are performed with malpositioning of the limb leading to wrong alignment measurements. The aim of this retrospective study was to show the usefulness of a simple device which might enhance the reproducibility of limb rotation on long-leg radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 20 consecutive patients with TSF treatment and at least three long-leg radiographs (4.9 ± 1.3). Eight out of 20 patients received radiographs with the help of a rotation rod (device with two clamps and a carbon tube). It is placed at the most frontal tab of the reference ring while conducting the radiograph. By this means, limb rotation can be controlled. To show the usefulness of this device, two observers measured the relation of the distances between the middle of the reference ring to the medial and lateral fourth hole on the reference ring (TSF-RR). The standard deviation and range of the TSF-RR of all radiographs for each patient was calculated and compared between patients without and with the rotation rod. RESULTS: The standard deviations of TSF-RR in patients without the rotation rod was significantly higher compared to patients with rotation rod (observer 1: p = 0.0228, observer 2: p = 0.0038). Also, the range of the TSF-RR within one patient is significant higher (observer 1: p = 0.0279, observer 2: p = 0.0038) in patients without the rotation rod compared to patients with the rotation rod. CONCLUSIONS: The variability of rotation on radiographs was lower with the rotation rod. Therefore, more reproducible and better comparable radiographs can be conducted. Radiologic exposure might be reduced as repetition of wrongly positioned limbs on radiographs are less frequent.

Evaluation of Radiology Reports by the Emergency Department Clinical Providers: A Message to Radiologists [Formula: see text].

OBJECTIVES: This study is an evaluation of the emergency department (ED) satisfaction with the current radiologic reporting system used at a major Northeastern academic medical center. The radiology reports are the main form of communication and usually the final product of any radiological investigation delivered to clinicians. The aim of this study was to improve current radiology reporting practices and to better tailor reports to match the needs and expectations of ED clinicians. METHODS: A 9-question online survey was sent to ED residents, fellows, faculty, and nurse practitioners/advanced practice providers at a major Northeastern academic medical center in the United States. For the open-ended section, coding and emergent theme categorization was conducted for quantification of responses. The survey was designed to evaluate the attitudes toward the structure, style, form, and wording used in reports. RESULTS: The response rate was 48.6% (68/140). The ED respondents were generally satisfied with radiology reports, their language, vocabulary, and clarity. They preferred the impression section to be before the findings in simple examinations and to stratify the reports according to emergency status for complex examinations. They did not like extended differential, hedge terms, and delayed reporting. Additionally, ED respondents recommended focused, fast reporting with considerable changes toward a more standardized report. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation delivered a list of actionable recommendations. The top recommendation is to standardize reporting structure, style, and lexicon, in addition to being focused, timely, and brief.

Best Practices to Verify Ongoing Placement of NG or OG Tube After Initial X-ray Confirmation.

BACKGROUND: Many patients in intensive care units (ICU) require nasogastric (NG) or orogastric (OG) tubes. These patients often require a combination of sedatives that can alter level of consciousness and impair cough or gag reflexes. Such factors can lead to NG/OG tube displacement. Using a misplaced tube can lead to aspiration, lung injury, infection, and even death. AIMS: To standardize ongoing verification of NG tube placement practices in our 34-bed Medical-Surgical ICU. METHODS: The Johns Hopkins Nursing Model was utilized to guide this project. A literature review and critical appraisal were performed to establish NG/OG tube best practices. Best practices were implemented and assessed (via a survey and charting audits). RESULTS: Fifteen publications were identified and appraised as Level 4 and 5 sources. Best evidence supported that at the time of radiographic confirmation of the tube site, it should be marked with inedible ink or adhesive tape where it exits the nares; tube location should be checked at 4-hour intervals; and placement/patency should be checked in patients who complain of pain, vomiting, or coughing. Following the practice change, N = 40 nurses indicated improvement in verification of NG/OG tube knowledge, "OK to use" order was verified for 89% of patients, and 63% of tubes were marked with tape at the exit site. LINKING ACTION TO EVIDENCE: Adherence to current, evidence-based strategies for NG/OG tube verification promotes patient safety. Monitoring practice changes is critical to determine whether a best practice is sustained. Electronic health records must be current to guide and support evidence-based nursing practice.

A systematic review reporting quality of radiomics research in neuro-oncology: toward clinical utility and quality improvement using high-dimensional imaging features.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate radiomics analysis in neuro-oncologic studies according to a radiomics quality score (RQS) system to find room for improvement in clinical use. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase were searched up the terms radiomics or radiogenomics and gliomas or glioblastomas until February 2019. From 189 articles, 51 original research articles reporting the diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive utility were selected. The quality of the methodology was evaluated according to the RQS. The adherence rates for the six key domains were evaluated: image protocol and reproducibility, feature reduction and validation, biologic/clinical utility, performance index, a high level of evidence, and open science. Subgroup analyses for journal type (imaging vs. clinical) and biomarker (diagnostic vs. prognostic/predictive) were performed. RESULTS: The median RQS was 11 out of 36 and adherence rate was 37.1%. Only 29.4% performed external validation. The adherence rate was high for reporting imaging protocol (100%), feature reduction (94.1%), and discrimination statistics (96.1%), but low for conducting test-retest analysis (2%), prospective study (3.9%), demonstrating potential clinical utility (2%), and open science (5.9%). None of the studies conducted a phantom study or cost-effectiveness analysis. Prognostic/predictive studies received higher score than diagnostic studies in comparison to gold standard (P < .001), use of calibration (P = .02), and cut-off analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of reporting of radiomics studies in neuro-oncology is currently insufficient. Validation is necessary using external dataset, and improvements need to be made to feature reproducibility, demonstrating clinical utility, pursuits of a higher level of evidence, and open science.

Variabilities in X-ray diagnostic reference levels.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the variability of X-ray diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) depending on the number of X-ray devices and data per device. METHODS: Dose-area products (DAP) were collected by the national nuclear control agency from the 590 devices installed in 345 medical centers in the country. From 2015 to 2017, the number of chest (postero-anterior (PA) view alone, and both postero-anterior and lateral views (PA/LAT)), abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine examinations collected in these centers ranged from 23,000 to 77,000. The impact of the number of devices and DAP data per device on DRLs' variabilities (95th confidence intervals divided by medians) is estimated using a bootstrapping method as a function of the number of devices and DAP per device. RESULTS: The DRLs' variabilities ranged from 30 to 200% depending on the number of devices and DAP data per device but stabilized at 30% when the number of devices was higher than 200 for chest PA and abdomen examinations, 300 for lumbar spine and pelvis examinations, and 400 for chest PA/LAT examinations, regardless of the number of DAP data per device. Extrapolations of our results suggest that thousands of devices are necessary to reduce DRLs' variabilities to 10%. CONCLUSION: DAP-related DRL variabilities are high but only moderately influenced by the number of DAP data per device and of devices provided this number is higher than 200 to 400 devices according to the type of examination. Harmonization of methods of data collection between the authorities of the EU states should be recommended. KEY POINTS: • DAP-related DRLs are not fixed values but ranges of values with at least 30% variability. • DAP-related DRLs strongly depend on the number of devices included when lower than 100. • If the number of devices included exceeds 200 to 400, the DRLs' variabilities do not depend on the number of DAP per device and should not exceed 30%.

Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze 11-year data of France for temporal trends in dose indices and dose optimization and draw lessons for those who are willing to work on creation and update of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). METHODS: The data from about 3000 radiology departments leading to about 750,000 imaging exams between 2004 and 2015 was analyzed, and patterns of reductions in dose for those below and above the DRLs were estimated and correlated with technology change. RESULTS: Dose optimization achieved was important and significant in departments which were above or just below the DRL (p = .006) but not in those which were around half of the DRL values. The decrease in 75th percentile value of Kerma air product (KAP) for chest radiography by 27.4% between 2004 and 2015 was observed with the number of flat panel detectors increase from 6 to 43%. A good correlation between the detector type distribution and the level of patient radiation exposure is observed. Otherwise, setting DRLs for standard-sized patient excludes patients lower and higher weighted than "standard." CONCLUSIONS: The concept of DRL may become obsolete unless lessons drawn from the experience of users are taken into account. While establishing DRLs should be part of the regulations, setting up and updating values should be governed by bodies whose decision-making cycle is short, at the most 1 year. A local rather than national approach, taking into account body habitus and image quality, needs to be organized. KEY POINTS: • The technology changes faster than regulations. Requirement of DRL establishment should be part of the regulations; however, setting and updating values should be the role of professional societies. • The concept of DRL, highlighting the 75th percentile values and dedicated to standard-sized adult, misses optimization opportunities in the majority of patients who are below the 75th percentile value and outside the range of standard-sized adult. • The ugly aspects of the DRL concept include its non-applicability to individuals, no customization to clinical indications, and lack of consideration of image quality.

Routine Chest X-Rays After Thoracic Surgery Are Unnecessary.

BACKGROUND: Routine chest x-rays (CXRs) ordered on thoracic surgery inpatients are common, costly, and of unclear clinical utility. We sought to investigate CXR ordering practices and their impact on clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted after undergoing thoracic surgery with an intraoperative chest tube (CT) placed was performed over a 1-y period. Our primary outcome was a CXR-driven change in care. We evaluated routine CXR orders immediately after surgery in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and after final CT removal. "Routine" was defined as not ordered during a workup for a clinical concern. Patients were excluded if they underwent pleurodesis, were discharged with a CT, or had an immediate post-CT removal clinical change prompting intervention. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients met inclusion. All patients received a routine PACU CXR, and 48% (117) had abnormal radiographic findings (e.g., pneumothorax, consolidation, effusion, etc). Secondary to this CXR, one patient (0.4%) experienced a change in care: a repeat CXR only. All patients received a routine final CT removal CXR, and 58% (140) had abnormal radiographic findings. After this CXR, 33 patients (14%) experienced a change in care: 32 underwent repeat CXR and one was clinically observed. Overall, no patients experienced a procedural intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Routine post-thoracic surgery CXRs in the PACU and after CT removal have limited clinical impact. Quality initiatives should be pursued to decrease empiric CXR use and reserve ordering for specific clinical concerns.

Advanced Imaging Interpretation by Radiologists and Nonradiologist Physicians: A Training Issue.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which nonradiologist physicians provide formal interpretations for advanced imaging and to consider whether adequate training can be achieved for those physicians. This investigation assumed that hospitals are the only places where formal imaging training occurs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The CMS Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files (PSPSMFs) of the Medicare Part B datasets for 2015 were reviewed. We selected the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for four categories of noninvasive diagnostic imaging: CT, MRI, PET, and general nuclear imaging. Medicare place-of-service codes allowed us to determine the location of each study interpretation. We narrowed our analysis to data from the three major hospital places of service: inpatient facilities, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments. Provider specialties were determined using Medicare's 108 specialty codes. Procedure volumes among nonradiologist physicians were compared with those among radiologists. RESULTS. Of the 17,824,297 hospital-based CT examinations performed in the Medicare fee-for-service population, radiologists interpreted 17,698,360 (99.29%) and nonradiologists interpreted 125,937 (0.71%). Of the 4,512,627 MRI examinations performed, radiologists interpreted 4,469,275 (99.04%) and nonradiologist physicians interpreted 43,352 (0.96%). Of 391,688 PET studies performed, radiologists interpreted 368,913 (94.19%) and nonradiologist physicians interpreted 22,775 (5.81%). Of the 2,070,861 general nuclear medicine studies performed, radiologists interpreted 1,307,543 (63.14%) and nonradiologist physicians interpreted 763,318 (36.86%). Cardiologists had the largest involvement of nonradiologist physicians, contributing approximately 3% of all advanced imaging interpretations. All other nonradiologist physicians interpreted a tiny fraction of advanced imaging studies. CONCLUSION. Besides radiologists and cardiologists, no other medical specialty provides sufficient education for their trainees and practitioners in advanced imaging interpretation to justify allowing them to interpret these studies in practice, except under carefully controlled circumstances.

Radiographic measurements of cervical alignment, fusion and subsidence after ACDF surgery and their impact on clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Some recent studies indicate correlations between cervical alignment and clinical outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. However, there still are no established criteria for the interpretation of alignment, fusion and subsidence in relation to clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 208 radiographs of patients following ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage implantation was performed. The measurements were obtained on plain radiographs in lateral and anteroposterior projections as well as flexion/extension radiographs. Cervical alignment was measured using the Gore, Laing and Cobb methods; fusion was evaluated by an assortment of radiographic hallmarks: the presence of bridging bone, the Cobb angle and the distances between the tips and bases of the spinous processes of the operated segments, respectively. For assessment of subsidence, we used the Mochida method in addition to ventral and dorsal segmental height reduction. Correlation analysis between the different radiological characteristics and clinical outcome at a minimum follow-up of 12 months was conducted. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were evaluated for alignment, fusion and subsidence. Cervical alignment using the Gore and Cobb methods correlated among each other, but failed to exhibit significant correlation with clinical outcome. Interpretation of fusion rates varied greatly (43.9 to 89.4%) depending on the criteria used. Pearson coefficients between radiographic presence of pseudarthrosis and the measurements of the spinous process distances (0.595; p < 0.001), the Cobb angles (0.187; p = 0.007) and the presence of bridging bone (0.224; p < 0.001) each exhibited statistical significance. None of the methods employed significantly correlated with clinical outcome. Regarding subsidence, we found rates of 62%, 48% and 27% using the Mochida, ventral and dorsal segmental height reduction assessment methods, respectively. Pearson correlations between pairs of Mochida/ventral (r = 0.39; p = 0.66) and Mochida/dorsal (r = 0.007; p = 0.921) height reduction assessment methods were weak and no significant correlation between subsidence rates and clinical outcome was shown. CONCLUSION: All measured parameters varied depending in the measurement method used. This was most pronounced for fusion. There was a moderate positive correlation between neck pain and subsidence as measured by the Mochida method.

Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method.

PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x-ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x-ray unit across a range of energies (60-120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be -9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x-ray beam conditions and under a 1-mm copper filtered x-ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from -6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites.

Level of Experience Does Not Influence the Accuracy of Radiographic and Ultrasound Measurements of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Distractions.

BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have become a popular surgical option for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Both radiographs and ultrasound are currently used to measure the amount of length achieved when MCGRs are distracted. Previous studies have investigated the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction. Some authors have reported that there is a "learning curve" in measuring MCGR lengthening with ultrasound, suggesting that new users require several months of experience before they can accurately perform the measurements. The goal of this study was to determine whether surgical experience of the rater is associated with the accuracy of radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction. METHODS: Six raters evaluated 29 deidentified radiographs and 30 ultrasound images from early-onset scoliosis patients with MCGR. Raters had varying levels of experience, ranging from a senior fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeon to a junior orthopaedic surgery resident. Raters measured the amount of rod distraction in 2 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart. All raters were provided with a document demonstrating the radiographic and ultrasound measurement techniques before the first round of measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement was achieved for both radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction. Subanalysis based on experience level showed that excellent intraobserver agreement was maintained with no evidence of decreased reliability in raters with less experience. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement was obtained with radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction, regardless of the experience level of the rater. Posting a document with the radiographic and ultrasound measurement techniques in the orthopaedic surgery clinic, and perhaps also the radiology reading room may help avoid inaccurate measurements of distraction length secondary to a learning curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic.

Can EOS Imaging Substitute for Conventional Radiography in Measurement of Acetabular Morphology in the Young Dysplastic Hip?

BACKGROUND: EOS imaging offers a low-radiation alternative to conventional radiography (CR) and has little to no magnification effects. However, it is unclear how radiographic measures may be affected using EOS. The present study aims to determine the reproducibility of measures of acetabular morphology on EOS images as compared with CR, and to directly compare the 2 imaging modalities. METHODS: A total of 21 consecutive patients (66.7% female; 14.4±4.7 y) indicated for an open hip preservation procedure with both an anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph and EOS image performed preoperatively were included. Three orthopaedic surgeons measured Tönnis angle, lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR), and extrusion index (EI). Measurements were performed twice, 2 weeks apart. Reliability between observers and time points was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement between time points and modalities was measured using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: On EOS images, inter-rater reliability was 0.86 for Tönnis angle, 0.86 for LCEA, 0.74 for ADR, and 0.93 for EI. On CR, inter-rater reliability was 0.86 for Tönnis anlge, 0.90 for LCEA, 0.82 for ADR, and 0.84 for EI. In the agreement analysis, biases between imaging modalities were observed. On average, raters measured Tönnis angle and EI higher on EOS images than CR (2.22 degrees, 1.09%, respectively); and LCEA and ADR lower on EOS images than CR (1.54 degrees, 1.14% respectively). Limits of agreement (LOA) between modalities were similar to that of LOA observed in intra-rater analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of acetabular morphology performed on EOS images have similarly high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability compared with CR. Measures performed on EOS also have similar intra-rater agreement as compared with CR. Intermodality agreement had similar LOA as intra-rater agreement on either individual imaging modality. Small biases between imaging modalities were detected. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level I-diagnostic study: investigating a diagnostic test.

[Acute abdomen : What does the nonradiologist expect from the radiologist?] / Akutes Abdomen : Was erwartet der Nicht-Radiologe vom Radiologen?

BACKGROUND: The acute abdomen is a life-threatening condition that demands urgent intervention. The required diagnostics should address the core problem and has to be chosen based upon the diagnostic strength of each diagnostic tool. Modalities with limited discriminating information regarding differential diagnosis have to be avoided. Expectancy and thoughts of the radiologist often differ from the view of the clinician in the emergency department. OBJECTIVE: The decision about which diagnostic tools are valuable or unnecessary in the emergency setting is made from a surgeon's point of view. Close communication with radiologists is mandatory. We demonstrate the importance of clinical signs and symptoms and their correlation with helpful radiologic diagnostics. CONCLUSION: The emergency radiologic diagnostic workup of acute abdomen has to be targeted and the radiologist must answer the questions in order to clarify whether an operation is indicated and to help define the surgical strategy. In emergency surgery as in acute abdomen extended diagnostics to reach a decision is a dangerous waste of time and must be avoided at all costs. Therefore close communication with the radiologist is crucial.