Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient systematized evidence on the effectiveness of individual intranasal medications in allergic rhinitis (AR). OBJECTIVES: We sought to perform a systematic review to compare the efficacy of individual intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines against placebo in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms and the rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality of life of patients with perennial or seasonal AR. METHODS: The investigators searched 4 electronic bibliographic databases and 3 clinical trials databases for randomized controlled trials (1) assessing adult patients with seasonal or perennial AR and (2) comparing the use of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus placebo. Assessed outcomes included the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. The investigators performed random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences for each medication and outcome. The investigators assessed evidence certainty using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: This review included 151 primary studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal AR and displayed unclear or high risk of bias. Both in perennial and seasonal AR, most assessed treatments were more effective than placebo. In seasonal AR, azelastine-fluticasone, fluticasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate were the medications with the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements in the Total Nasal Symptom Score and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Azelastine-fluticasone displayed the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements of Total Ocular Symptom Score. Overall, evidence certainty was considered "high" in 6 of 46 analyses, "moderate" in 23 of 46 analyses, and "low"/"very low" in 17 of 46 analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Most intranasal medications are effective in improving rhinitis symptoms and quality of life. However, there are relevant differences in the associated evidence certainty.

Nine-Year Trend in the Prevalence of Allergic Diseases and Their Associated Factors in Young Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Notably, few studies have evaluated the recent changes in the prevalence of allergic diseases in young adults. Studies examining the risk of allergy in two populations with similar social backgrounds, other than the region in which they live, are rare. METHODS: First-year students from Hokkaido University were enrolled in this study between 2011 and 2019. A questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the annual prevalence of current wheeze, seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) in nonsmoking young adults. Trends in the presence of these disease conditions were evaluated based on their hometowns (Hokkaido and outside Hokkaido separately) due to the low prevalence of cedar pollen allergies in Hokkaido. The association between these disease conditions and body mass index (BMI) was also assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of current wheeze and PAR food allergies did not change in both regions. SAR showed a significantly increasing trend; however, the prevalence of SAR was higher among those whose place of origin was not Hokkaido. Current wheeze was positively associated with obesity (p < 0.05), whereas the high prevalence of SAR was not associated with body weight. In contrast, a lean body type was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of PAR (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The prevalence of current wheeze was stable and that of PAR has decreased over the past 9 years. However, the prevalence of SAR in Hokkaido has been increasing in Japanese young adults. A differential association between current wheeze and BMI was observed when comparing PAR and SAR.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy using house dust mite tablet for 1-4 years old children with perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) has not been extensively studied in preschoolers. We investigated the efficacy and safety of house dust mite (HDM) SLIT-tablet for children aged 1-4 years. METHODS: Children aged 1-4 years with AR were divided into SLIT (n = 22) and control (n = 12) groups based on their guardians' preferences. The SLIT group received a daily dose of 10,000 JAU of HDM SLIT-tablet for 12 months, whereas the control group received symptomatic treatment only. RESULTS: The baseline median age was 41 and 34 months in the SLIT and control groups, respectively, and the median AR symptom score was 4 for both groups. Compared with baseline, the AR symptom score had decreased significantly in the SLIT group after 12 months (score: 3, p = .002), whereas it tended to increase in the control group (score: 6, p = .08). Adverse reactions to SLIT were mild and occurred in eight patients (36%). In the SLIT group, Dermatophagoides (D.) farinae-specific IgE (sIgE) levels increased during the first 6 months and decreased to baseline levels at 12 months. In the control group, D. farinae-sIgE levels had increased significantly at 12 months compared to baseline (p = .01). D. farinae-specific IgG4 and HDM IgE-blocking factor levels were significantly increased at 12 months compared to baseline in the SLIT group only (p < .001). A lower wheezing frequency was seen in the SLIT group (0.3%) compared to the control group (0.7%). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and immunomodulatory effects of HDM SLIT-tablet in preschoolers with AR.

Efficacy and safety of intratonsillar immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A lower adherence rate existed in patients receiving allergen-specific immunotherapy due to its lengthy period and adverse effects even though it is the only curative treatment for IgE-mediated allergies. Therefore, exploring innovative allergen-specific immunotherapy routes is necessary. OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of the intratonsillar injection of house dust mite (HDM) extract in patients with HDM-induced allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 80 patients with HDM-induced AR were randomized to receive 6 intratonsillar injections with HDM extract or placebo in 3 months. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), visual analogue scale of nasal symptoms, combined symptom and medication score, mini rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire, and serum allergen-specific IgG4 to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were all monitored at baseline and 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment was finished. The intent-to-treat and per-protocol set (PPS) are both analyzed. RESULTS: The primary end points TNSS and ΔTNSS were improved significantly at 3 months after the patients with AR finished a 3-month 6-injection intratonsillar immunotherapy compared with those in the placebo treatment in both intent-to-treat and PPS. Results of visual analogue scale, combined symptom and medication score, and mini rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire were also improved significantly at 3 months after the treatment in PPS. However, the improvement effect of intratonsillar immunotherapy at 6 and 12 months was limited and uncertain based on the data. The increase of serum Der p IgG4 in the active group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group at 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment was finished. Adverse events were monitored, and no systemic adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: The clinical trial revealed that intratonsillar injection with HDM extract was safe and effective in patients with AR. Optimizing the protocol and allergen formulations is expected to increase and maintain the efficacy of this novel approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-13003600.

Comparison of clinical traits for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis during allergen exposure.

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is traditionally subdivided into seasonal AR (SAR) and perennial AR (PAR) according to the type of allergen and the occurrence of symptoms during the year. There are currently no reports on the comparison of trait profiles for SAR and PAR during the allergen exposure. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of SAR and PAR during respective allergen exposure periods to provide valuable information for the development of treatment strategies. Methods: This study was performed between August 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022, in the Department of Allergy, Beijing Tongren Hospital. We continuously included diagnosed SAR and PAR outpatients who volunteered to participate in the survey. A questionnaire with regard to medical history, severity of symptoms, and diagnosis and treatment status was collected. Results: A total of 296 patients with SAR and 448 with PAR were finally recruited. Patients with SAR had more severe rhinorrhea compared with patients with PAR (p < 0.001), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the severity of itching, sneezing, and congestion between the two entities (p ≥ 0.05). Both the gritty and watery eyes of patients with SAR were noticeably more severe than those of patients with PAR (PTotal Ocular Symptom Score [PTOSS] < 0.001). AR symptom severity is mainly associated with the comorbid allergic conjunctivitis (odds ratio 1.94 [95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.09]). SAR patients and PAR patients show no statistically significant differences in terms of their frequency of visits, annual expenditure, and choice of medication treatment for AR (p > 0.05). The overall control under standard medication of both patients with PAR and those with SAR is not ideal, especially in SAR. Conclusion: The current cross-sectional study demonstrated that the patients with SAR exhibited more severe overall clinical symptoms than those with PAR, especially nasal rhinorrhea and gritty and watery eyes. Both of the two disease entities have poor control under standardized medication treatment, especially in SAR. Further multicenter longitudinal studies that involve larger and more diverse populations should be conducted to provide a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the condition.

A modified schedule of multiple aeroallergen ultra-rush immunotherapy in perennial allergic rhinitis: safety, efficacy, and T lymphocyte cell population studies.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed whether a modified immunotherapy schedule for allergic rhinitis could be safe and efficient. Ultra-rush immunotherapy (URIT) rapidly desensitizes patients to aeroallergens. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a modified URIT protocol in 3 days to achieve the target dose while observing whether it could improve this situation and decrease the time to achieve the maintenance dose. METHODS: The URIT was exercised in 21 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Premeditations were given to the patients 3 days prior to the immunotherapy and during the 3 days injections immunotherapy: pred nisolone, ranitidine, and Airokast/montelukast. Finally, the T cell population frequencies of patients prior to and after immunotherapy, including T helper 1, T helper 2, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and regulatory T cells, were studied using flow cytometry. During the URIT protocol, 21 patients received 291 injections. RESULT: Six patients (28.6%) showed systemic reactions in our study. All systemic reactions occurred on the third day by the 1:1 dilution of the maintenance dose. These systemic reactions occurred in three patients after 13 injections, and the three remaining patients showed systemic reactions following the last injection. No systemic reaction was observed on the first and second day of the therapy, and the risk of systemic reaction with every injection was about 2%. Among the T cell populations, CD3+ and CD8+ cells decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasized that URIT, alongside premedication with a high dose of antihistamine, helped to achieve the maintenance dose and control clinical manifestations.

Short-term and long-term efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in different courses for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis.

PURPOSE: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proven to be an effective and safe treatment for patients with house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) to achieve short-term and long-term efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SLIT duration and long-term efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 134 patients who underwent SLIT between 2019 and 2021 (in the 2-year group), between 2018 and 2021(in the 3-year group), or between 2017 and 2021 (in the 4-year group). The total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), total medication score (TMS), visual analogue scale (VAS), the Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at baseline, after treatment (2021) and one year after the treatment completion (2022). The correlation between MiniRQLQ and other indicators was also analyzed. RESULTS: After SLIT, patients in all three groups showed significant improvements in TNSS, TMS, VAS and MiniRQLQ scores (all p < 0.001). These improvements were sustained even one year after SLIT. Patients who received 3-4 years of SLIT showed significant improvement compared with those who received 2 years of SLIT in all clinical outcomes (all p < 0.01). The analysis showed positive correlations between the MiniRQLQ and TNSS, TMS, and VAS (all p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the AE rate in all three groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Different duration of HDM SLIT could generate various short-term and long-term clinical efficacy. The MiniRQLQ could be applied to evaluate SLIT efficacy in clinical practice.

Nasal allergen challenge (NAC): Practical aspects and applications from an EU/US perspective-a Work Group Report of the AAAAI Rhinitis, Rhinosinusitis and Ocular Allergy Committee.

Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is applied in a variety of settings (research centers, specialty clinics, and hospitals) as a useful diagnostic and research tool. NAC is indicated for diagnosis of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, local allergic rhinitis, and occupational rhinitis; to design the composition of allergen immunotherapy in patients who are polysensitized; and to investigate the physio-pathological mechanisms of nasal diseases. NAC is currently a safe and reproducible technique, although it is time- and resource-consuming. NAC can be performed by a variety of methods, but the lack of a uniform technique for performing and recording the outcomes represents a challenge for those considering NAC as a clinical tool in the office. The availability of standardized allergens for NAC is also different in each country. The objective of this workgroup report is to review the current information about NAC, focusing on the practical aspects and application for diagnosis of difficult rhinitis phenotypes (eg, local allergic rhinitis, occupational rhinitis), taking into account the particular context of practice in the United States and the European Union.

Factors contributing to the diagnosis and onset prediction of perennial allergic rhinitis in high-risk children: A sub-analysis of the CHIBA study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic and predictive factors for perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) onset in children by analyzing the results of the Chiba High-risk Birth Cohort for Allergy study, which examined newborns with a family history of allergies. METHODS: Overall, 306 pregnant women were recruited. Their newborns were examined by otolaryngologists and pediatric allergists at 1, 2, and 5 years of age. Participants with clinical and laboratory data available at all consultation points were considered eligible. RESULTS: Among 187 eligible participants, the prevalence rates of PAR were 2.1%, 4.3%, and 24.1% at 1, 2, and 5 years of age, respectively. AR-specific nasal local findings and eosinophils in nasal smear were observed in a substantial number of patients with PAR at 1 and 2 years of age. Factors present up to 2 years of age that were associated with PAR onset at 5 years of age, in descending order, were as follows: sensitization to house dust mites (HDM), nasal eosinophilia, and sensitization to cat dander. In 44 cases with HDM sensitization, nasal eosinophilia up to 2 years of age achieved a sensitivity of 76.0% and a specificity of 73.7% for predicting PAR onset at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Rhinitis findings and nasal eosinophilia are useful auxiliary diagnostic items for pediatric PAR. Sensitization to HDM and nasal eosinophilia were the most influential factors associated with future PAR onset. A combination of these factors may facilitate the prediction of PAR onset.

[LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PEDIATRIC PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS USING LABORATORY EXAMINATIONS AND IN VIVO BIOMARKERS].

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with house dust mite (HDM) on pediatric perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) based on longitudinal assessment of nasal symptoms, laboratory examination, and in vivo biomarkers. METHOD: The subjects included 40 children with perennial AR who had SLIT with HDM for 2 years. Nasal symptoms, medications, skin prick tests, nasal provocation tests, and peripheral blood tests were evaluated before, 6 months, one year and two years after the onset of SLIT. RESULTS: Total nasal symptom scores, prick test wheal diameter, and peripheral blood eosinophil count decreased in 6 months. Total nasal symptom scores continued to decrease from 6 months to 2 years. Symptom-medication scores and nasal provocation test responses decreased in 1 year. Symptom-medication scores continued to decline from 1 to 2 years. Medication scores and nasal eosinophilia decreased in 2 years. Serum specific IgE to HDM slightly increased transiently and decreased in 2 years. The severity of symptoms and specific IgE to HDM at the baseline, and changes of symptoms and specific IgE to HDM during the first six months and first one year of SLIT were correlated with improvement in symptom scores over two years of SLUT. TNSS at baseline was correlated with that at second year. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal assessment of symptoms, allergen specific IgE, and in vivo biomarkers showed the effectiveness of SLIT. Symptom scores and allergen specific IgE may also be early predictive factors of SLIT efficacy in children with AR.

Allergic diseases in India - Prevalence, risk factors and current challenges.

Epidemiological studies have shown a rise in the prevalence of allergic diseases in India during the last two decades. However, recent evidence from the Global Asthma Network study has observed a decrease in allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis in children. Still, with a population over 1.3 billion, there is a huge burden of allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis, and this is compounded by an unmet demand for trained allergy specialists and poor health service framework. There is wide variation in the prevalence of allergic diseases between different geographical locations in India, and the reasons are unclear at present. This may at least in part be attributable to considerable heterogeneity in aero-biology, weather, air pollution levels, cultural and religious factors, diet, socioeconomic strata and literacy. At present, factors enhancing risks and those protecting from development of atopy and allergic diseases have not been well delineated, although there is some evidence for the influence of genetic factors alongside cultural and environmental variables such as diet, exposure to tobacco smoke and air pollution and residence in urban areas. This narrative review provides an overview of data from India regarding epidemiology, risk factors and genetics and highlights gaps in evidence as well as areas for future research.

Validated allergen exposure chamber is plausible tool for the assessment of house dust mite-triggered allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergen exposure chamber (AEC) is a clinical facility that allows exposure to allergenic airborne particles in controlled environment. Although AECs offer stable levels of airborne allergens, the validation of symptoms and other endpoints induced by allergen challenge is key for their recommendation as a plausible tool for the assessment of patients, especially in clinical research. This study aimed to demonstrate the reproducibility of defined clinical endpoints after AEC house dust mite (HDM) challenge under optimal conditions in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHOD: HDM was distributed at different concentrations. The assessment was subjective by the patients: total nasal symptom score (TNSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and objective by the investigator: acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and nasal secretion weight. Safety was assessed clinically and by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1 ). RESULTS: Constant environment: temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) concentration were maintained during all challenges. The concentration of HDM on average remained stable within the targeted values: 1000, 3000, 5000, 7000 particles (p)/m3 . Most symptoms were observed at concentrations 3000 p/m3 or higher. The symptoms severity and other endpoints results were reproducible. 5000 p/m3 , and challenge duration of 120 min were found optimal. The procedure was safe with no lung function abnormalities due to challenge. CONCLUSION: HDM challenge in ALL-MED AEC offers a safe and reliable method for inducing symptoms in AR patients for the use in controlled clinical studies including allergen immunotherapy.

Sensitisation to House Dust Mite Component Der p 23 Is Associated with Severe Symptoms and Asthma in Allergic Rhinitis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: House dust mite (HDM) is an important source of airborne allergens in China as it contains several allergenic components that can cause allergic rhinitis (AR) and other allergic diseases. This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and disease severity in AR patients sensitised to different allergenic HDM components. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, which examined 129 patients who were first diagnosed with only HDM-induced AR at the Department of Allergy of Beijing Tongren Hospital from December 2019 to April 2021. Clinical characteristics and disease severity of the patients were assessed based on the sensitisation to specific Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) allergenic components, including Der p 1, Der p 2, Der p 23, Der f 1, and Der f 2, employing multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) with correspondence analysis chart of MCA. RESULTS: Among HDM-induced AR cases, the positive rate of Der p 1 was the highest (87.6%), followed by Der p 2 (78.3%), Der f 2 (76.64%), Der f 1 (68.2%), and Der p 23 (37.2%). Multiple correspondence analyses showed that sensitisation to Der p 23 was associated with severe AR symptoms and asthma; sensitisation to Der p 2, Der f 1, and Der f 2 was associated with moderate AR; and no sensitisation to Der p 23 was associated with mild AR. CONCLUSION: Der p 23 sensitisation is prevalent in northern China and may be associated with severe symptoms and asthma in AR patients.

Sodium Chloride versus Lactose as a Carrier for House Dust Mite Allergen in Allergen Chamber Studies: A Clinical Study to Assess Noninferiority.

INTRODUCTION: In the Fraunhofer allergen challenge chamber (ACC), a standardized, universal, good manufacturing practice-conforming technology using a spray dried solution of lactose (L) and allergen extract has been established. In this study, we investigated the noninferiority of hypertonic sodium chloride (S) versus L as a carrier for house dust mite (HDM) allergen to simplify manufacturing, reduce costs, and allow for wider use. METHODS: Using a participant-blinded, sham exposure-controlled, single-arm, sequential intervention study, we challenged adults with HDM allergic rhinitis five times in the ACC. Participants were first exposed to S, L, and clean air (block 1), followed by S + HDM and L + HDM (block 2). Primary endpoints were mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and mean nasal secretion weight. RESULTS: 19 participants were enrolled in the study (10 females; mean age 32 years [22-49], 4 with mild allergic asthma). The safety profile of S + HDM and L + HDM was similar; eight participants experienced mild procedure-related adverse events including tiredness, cough, and dyspnea. Due to dropouts, 13 participants completed the study and were evaluated. Mean TNSS and nasal secretion were as follows: S 0.98, 0.28 g; L 1.1, 0.20 g; clean air 1.1, 0.23 g; S + HDM 5.7, 4.8 g; L + HDM 5.1, 5.1 g. Separate block 1/block 2 MANOVAs with TNSS and nasal secretion as dependent variables revealed no significant differences between the carriers, neither alone and compared with clean air (p = 0.2059, Wilk's λ = 0.78) nor combined with HDM (p = 0.3474, Wilk's λ = 0.89). Noninferiority of S was established using a meta-analysis-based minimal clinical important difference of -0.55: mean TNSS difference between S + HDM and L + HDM was 0.62 (90% CI: -0.51 to 1.74). CONCLUSION: S as an HDM carrier was safe and well tolerated. It was noninferior to L which makes it an adequate and easy-to-use carrier substitute.

House dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablet safety in adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: Worldwide clinical trial results.

BACKGROUND: The house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablet is a treatment option for allergic rhinitis with/without conjunctivitis (AR/C) approved in adults worldwide and in adolescents in some countries. OBJECTIVE: To supplement existing adolescent HDM SLIT-tablet safety data by conducting the MT-18 trial in adolescents. METHODS: MT-18 (EudraCT:2020-000446-34) was a phase 3, open-label, single-arm, 28-day safety trial of daily HDM SLIT-tablet (12 SQ-HDM dose) in European adolescents (12-17 years) with HDM AR/C, with or without asthma. The primary end point was at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). MT-18 results were compared with 12 SQ-HDM adolescent subpopulation data from previously described 1-year phase 3 trials conducted in North America (P001; clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01700192) or Japan (TO-203-3-2; JapicCTI:121848). RESULTS: No treatment-related anaphylaxis, epinephrine administrations, severe local swellings, severe mouth or throat edema, or eosinophilic esophagitis occurred in the trials. For MT-18 (N = 253), P001 (N adolescents = 189), and TO-203-3-2 (N adolescents = 206), the percentage of adolescents treated with 12 SQ-HDM reporting any TEAE was 88%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, and the percentage reporting any treatment-related AE (TRAE) was 86%, 93%, and 66%, respectively. The most common TRAEs were local application site reactions. Most TRAEs were mild in intensity and were typically experienced the first 1 to 2 days of treatment. There were no asthma-related TEAEs with the HDM SLIT-tablet. The safety profile appears similar between adolescents with or without asthma at baseline. CONCLUSION: The HDM SLIT-tablet was well tolerated in European, North American, and Japanese adolescents with HDM AR/C, indicating safety of the HDM SLIT-tablet is insensitive to age or geographic region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (P001: NCT01700192); EudraCT: (MT-18; 2020-000446-34); JapicCTI: (TO-203-3-2; 121848).

Clinical effectiveness of fluticasone furoate nasal spray for perennial allergic rhinitis in children: a comprehensive review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) versus placebo on nasal symptoms and safety in children with perennial allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted with data obtained from Medline and Embase databases up to April 2023. The population of interest was patients aged 2-12 years with perennial AR. The selection was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing FFNS with placebo. Outcomes of interest included the reflective total nasal symptoms scores (rTNSS) and safety. To assess the minimal clinically important difference for rTNSS, the Cohen's guideline was used. If the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and the lower limit of the 95 percent confidence interval (CI) exceeded the threshold of -0.20, effects were considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Three RCTs (959 pediatric patients) were selected. One study evaluated the short-term use of FFNS, another evaluated the long-term use of FFNS, and another evaluated both the short-term and long-term use of FFNS. FFNS produced a statistically significant reduction over placebo in rTNSS (SMD -0.18; 95 percent CI -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.03) in long-term treatment studies, but not in short-term treatment studies. However, since the mean reduction did not reach the minimum clinically important difference (SMD -0.20), these results were considered clinically not relevant. Safety outcomes with FFNS were similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence suggests that FFNS, 110 µg once daily, compared to placebo, does not produce a meaningful clinical effect on nasal symptom in children with perennial AR.

The relationship of D. pteronyssinus allergic component sIgE and sIgG4 in house dust mite allergic rhinitis or/and allergic asthma patients.

Objective: House-dust mite sensitization is an important cause of allergic asthma and/or rhinitis in southern China. This study aimed to analyze the immune effect and relationship between the Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus components specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and sIgG4. Methods: The serum levels of sIgE and sIgG4 to D. pteronyssinus allergen components Der p 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 23 were detected in 112 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and/or allergic asthma (AA). Results: Overall, Der p 1 had the highest positive rate of sIgE (72.3%), followed by Der p 2 (65.2%) and Der p 23 (46.4%). Meanwhile, the highest positive rates of sIgG4 were for Der p 2 (47.3%), Der p 1 (33.0%), and Der p 23 (25.0%). The patients with AR and AA had a higher positive rate (43.4%) of sIgG4 than that in the patients with AR (42.4%) and the patients with AA (20.4%; p = 0.043). In patients with AR, the positive rate of sIgE in Der p 1 (84.8%) was higher than that in sIgG4 (42.4%; p = 0.037), but the positive rate of sIgG4 in Der p 10 (21.2%) was higher than that in sIgE (18.2%; p < 0.001). Most of the patients were positive for sIgE and sIgG4 of Der p 2 and Der p 10 at the same time. However, positive results for sIgE alone were just found in Der p 7 and Der p 21. Optimal scale analysis showed that Der p 2, Der p 7, and Der p 21 sIgG4 were closely related to AR and AA (Cronbach α = 0.917). Conclusion: Herein, the D. pteronyssinus allergen components showed different characteristics among the patients with AR, patients with AA, and patients with AR and AA in southern China. Thus, sIgG4 may be play an important role in allergic reactions.

Prevalence and bidirectional association between rhinitis and urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Rhinitis, allergic rhinitis in particular, and urticaria are both common diseases globally. However, there is controversy with regard to the correlation between rhinitis and urticaria. Objective: To examine the accurate association between rhinitis and urticaria. Methods: Three medical literature data bases were searched from data base inception until January 11, 2022. The prevalence and association between rhinitis and urticaria were estimated by meta-analysis. Quality assessment was performed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled prevalence were calculated by using random-effects models. Results: Urticaria prevalence in patients with rhinitis was 17.6% (95% CI, 13.2%-21.9%). The pooled prevalence of rhinitis was 31.3% (95% CI, 24.2%-38.4%) in patients with urticaria, and rhinitis prevalence in patients with acute urticaria and chronic urticaria was 31.6% (95% CI, 7.4%-55.8%) and 28.7% (95% CI, 20.4%-36.9%), respectively. Rhinitis occurrence was significantly associated with urticaria (OR 2.67 [95% CI, 2.625-2.715]). Urticaria and rhinitis were diagnosed based on different criteria, possibly resulting in a potential error of misclassification. Conclusion: Rhinitis and urticaria were significantly correlated. Physicians should be cognizant with regard to this relationship and address nasal or skin symptoms in patients.

The association between allergic rhinitis and airway dysfunction and nasal endothelial damage and oxidative stress.

BACKGROUND: Although lower airway hyperresponsiveness is present in approximately one in three patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To evaluate nasal patency and pulmonary functions in AR independently of the presence of asthma and to investigate the relationships between these and nasal oxidative stress parameters and endothelial damage. METHODOLOGY: Seventy adolescents with AR (AR group - 27 with asthma and 43 without asthma) and 30 healthy controls (HC group) were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Endocan and oxidative biomarkers [total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), and oxidative stress index (OSI)] in nasal lavage fluid specimens; peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF); fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and impulse oscillometry (zR5, zR20, and R5-20 for resistance and zX5 and zX20 for reactance) were investigated. RESULTS: Nasal endocan, TOS, and OSI values were higher in the AR group and TAS in the HC group. There was no difference between AR groups with and without asthma in terms of nasal endocan and oxidative biomarkers. FeNO levels and airway resistance (zR5, zR20, and R5-20) were higher in the AR group than in the HC group. However, there was no difference between the groups in PNIF. X5 was higher among the AR without asthma than in the other groups. Correlation between OSI and R5-20 was observed in the AR group. In the linear regression model, (logged) OSI was significantly predicted (logged) R5-20. CONCLUSIONS: The airways of adolescents with AR without asthma were as much affected as those of the AR with asthma, and this effect was associated with nasal endothelial damage and an increase in oxidative stress.

CD38+ B cells affect immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the mainstay in the treatment of allergic diseases, but the therapeutic effects of AIT need to be improved. CD38+ B cells are an immune cell fraction involved in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases as well as in immune regulation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to elucidate the role of antigen-specific CD38+ B cells in AIT. METHODS: An analysis was carried out on AIT results of 48 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (AR), among which peripheral blood immune cells were analyzed by flow cytometry; serum cytokine levels were determined by ELISA. An AR murine model was developed to test the role of CD38+ B cells in AIT. RESULTS: A fraction of antigen-specific CD38+ B cell was detected in AR patients. CD38+ B-cell frequency was negatively correlated with the therapeutic effects of AIT. A negative correlation was detected between the CD38+ B-cell frequency and regulatory T-cell frequency in AR patients treated with AIT. Exposure to specific antigens induced CD38+ B cells to produce IL-6, that converted Treg cells to TH17 cells. Coadministration of anti-CD38 antibody significantly promoted the therapeutic effects of AIT. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen-specific CD38+ B cells compromise AIT effects by producing IL-6 to convert regulatory T cells to TH17 cells. Inhibition of CD38+ B cells promotes the effects of AIT.