ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: By the end of 2022, nearly 20 million workers in the United States have gained paid-sick-leave coverage from mandates that require employers to provide benefits to qualified workers, including paid time off for the use of preventive services. Although the lack of paid-sick-leave coverage may hinder access to preventive care, current evidence is insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions about its relationship to cancer screening. METHODS: We examined the association between paid-sick-leave mandates and screening for breast and colorectal cancers by comparing changes in 12- and 24-month rates of colorectal-cancer screening and mammography between workers residing in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that have been affected by paid-sick-leave mandates (exposed MSAs) and workers residing in unexposed MSAs. The comparisons were conducted with the use of administrative medical-claims data for approximately 2 million private-sector employees from 2012 through 2019. RESULTS: Paid-sick-leave mandates were present in 61 MSAs in our sample. Screening rates were similar in the exposed and unexposed MSAs before mandate adoption. In the adjusted analysis, cancer-screening rates were higher among workers residing in exposed MSAs than among those in unexposed MSAs by 1.31 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 2.34) for 12-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.56 percentage points (95% CI, 0.33 to 2.79) for 24-month colorectal cancer screening, 1.22 percentage points (95% CI, -0.20 to 2.64) for 12-month mammography, and 2.07 percentage points (95% CI, 0.15 to 3.99) for 24-month mammography. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of private-sector workers in the United States, cancer-screening rates were higher among those residing in MSAs exposed to paid-sick-leave mandates than among those residing in unexposed MSAs. Our results suggest that a lack of paid-sick-leave coverage presents a barrier to cancer screening. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Sick Leave , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mandatory Programs/economics , Mandatory Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Mandatory Programs/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/economics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/legislation & jurisprudence , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the national burden of working time lost to occupational injury and disease in Australia compensable by workers' compensation schemes; to characterise the distribution of time lost by age, sex, and injury and disease type. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study; analysis of National Dataset for Compensation-based Statistics (NDS) data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Granted workers' compensation claims by people aged 15-100 years including payment of wage replacement benefits for time off work lodged in Australia, 1 July 2012 - 30 June 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Working years lost (WYL) per annum (total number of years of wage replacement benefits paid to injured and ill workers), overall and by sex, age, and injury and disease type; WYL per 10 000 fulltime equivalent (FTE) years worked. RESULTS: A total of 755 330 eligible claims with complete data for analysis variables by people aged 15-100 years were identified, for compensable injuries and disease that led to 41 194 (95% confidence interval [CI], 41 020-41 368) WYL/year. The annual WYL number and rate were each higher for men (25 367 [95% CI, 25 230-25 503] WYL/year; 42.6 [95% CI, 42.1-43.1] WYL/10 000 FTE years) than for women (15 827 [95% CI, 15 720-15 935] WYL/year; 38.8 [95% CI, 38.2-39.4] WYL/10 000 FTE years). Workers aged 45-100 years made 66 742 claims per year (44.1% of all claims) but incurred 21 763 WYL/year (52.8% of all WYL). Traumatic joint and muscle injuries led to 16 494 WYL/year (40.0% of all WYL), musculoskeletal disorders to 8547 WYL/year (20.7%), mental health conditions to 5361 WYL/year (13.0%), fractures to 4276 WYL/year (10.4%), and wounds and lacerations to 3449 WYL/year (8.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Occupational injury and disease covered by workers' compensation result in lost working time in Australia equivalent to more than 41 000 fulltime jobs. Distribution of the burden reflects the greater labour force participation of men, slower recovery of older workers, and the impact of common occupational injuries and diseases. Population-based monitoring of lost working time could support effective occupational health surveillance and allocation of resources for protecting the health of Australian workers.
Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases , Occupational Injuries , Workers' Compensation , Humans , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Female , Australia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/economics , Aged , Young Adult , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/economics , Aged, 80 and over , Cost of Illness , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/economicsABSTRACT
The changes in the modern work environment are accompanied by specific stressors that can have a negative impact on employees' mental health. In line with this, the proportion of sick-leave days due to mental disorders has recently risen to 17.7% compared to 10.9% in 2007, which in 2021 was associated with costs of 42.9 billion euros due to losses of gross value and productivity.Based on current health economic studies, this review provides an overview of the economic impact of incapacity to work and early retirement due to various mental disorders in Germany. In absolute figures, expenditure on incapacity to work is particularly high for common mental illnesses such as affective and anxiety disorders. Rarer mental disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder and eating disorders cause high costs in relation to their low prevalence, particularly due to sickness benefit payments.In addition to these economic implications, the consequences of incapacity to work, early retirement, and unemployment are examined at an individual level and explanatory approaches for the specific psychosocial stresses are presented. The latter highlights the need for scientifically substantiated treatment methods. Certified treatments have proven to be efficient in reducing the number of sick-leave days, particularly for common mental disorders. This applies even more to workplace-related interventions, which appear to be superior to conventional methods in this respect. Workplace-based therapies incorporate work-related models and focus on the planning of reintegration into the workplace. Further naturalistic studies are needed to test the transferability of the effectiveness of these treatments to other disorders.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Sick Leave , Humans , Cost of Illness , Germany , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Sick Leave/economics , Work Capacity EvaluationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The value of frequent, rapid testing to reduce community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To define performance standards and predict the clinical, epidemiologic, and economic outcomes of nationwide, home-based antigen testing. DESIGN: A simple compartmental epidemic model that estimated viral transmission, portrayed disease progression, and forecast resource use, with and without testing. DATA SOURCES: Parameter values and ranges as informed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance and published literature. TARGET POPULATION: U.S. population. TIME HORIZON: 60 days. PERSPECTIVE: Societal; costs included testing, inpatient care, and lost workdays. INTERVENTION: Home-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative infections and deaths, number of persons isolated and hospitalized, and total costs. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Without a testing intervention, the model anticipates 11.6 million infections, 119 000 deaths, and $10.1 billion in costs ($6.5 billion in inpatient care and $3.5 billion in lost productivity) over a 60-day horizon. Weekly availability of testing would avert 2.8 million infections and 15 700 deaths, increasing costs by $22.3 billion. Lower inpatient outlays ($5.9 billion) would partially offset additional testing expenditures ($12.5 billion) and workdays lost ($14.0 billion), yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $7890 per infection averted and $1 430 000 per death averted. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Outcome estimates vary widely under different behavioral assumptions and testing frequencies. However, key findings persist across all scenarios, with large reductions in infections, mortality, and hospitalizations. Costs per death averted are roughly an order of magnitude lower than commonly accepted willingness-to-pay values per statistical life saved ($5 to $17 million). LIMITATIONS: Analysis was restricted to at-home testing. There are uncertainties concerning test performance. CONCLUSION: High-frequency home testing for SARS-CoV-2 with an inexpensive, imperfect test could contribute to pandemic control at justifiable cost and warrants consideration as part of a national containment strategy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/economics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , Home Care Services/economics , Mass Screening/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19/mortality , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sick Leave/economics , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: A key criticism of applying the friction cost approach (FCA) to productivity cost estimation is its focus on a single friction period. A more accurate estimate of the friction cost of worker absence requires consideration of the chain of secondary vacancies arising from the opening of a new primary vacancy. Currently, empirical evidence on this is almost absent. We suggest an original approach to empirically estimate productivity costs that include a chain of secondary vacancies. METHODS: The vacancy multiplier is based on labor market flows and transition probabilities between states of employment, unemployment, and economic inactivity. It is a summed infinite geometric series using a common ratio et - the probability of an employed person filling a new job vacancy in a given year. We report vacancy multipliers for 30 European countries for 2011-2019. RESULTS: The average multiplier across Europe is 2.21 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.40) in 2019, meaning that every new primary vacancy created a chain of secondary vacancies that increased the primary friction cost by a factor of 2.21. The equivalent multiplier is 1.99 (SD = 0.37) between 2011 and 2019. Romania had the lowest country-specific multiplier (1.11 in 2011), and Greece the highest (4.51 in 2011). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the extent of underestimation of current FCA costs, comprise a resource for future researchers, and provide an implementable formula to compute the multiplier for other countries.
Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Models, Econometric , Personnel Turnover/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Cost of Illness , Decision Trees , Europe , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is the most commonly recognized occupational disease in Denmark. OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of recognized OCD on degree of employment, sick leave, unemployment, and job change. METHODS: Data on all recognized individuals with OCD notified in Denmark between 2010 and 2015 (n = 8940) were linked to information on social transfer payments in the years before and after notification. The number of weeks on unemployment benefits or sick leave and the degree of employment during the 2 years prior to notification was compared with the 2 years following notification. RESULTS: The degree of employment decreased on average 8.9 work-hours/month, corresponding to an average annual loss of income per worker of approximately 1570. The average number of weeks that workers were receiving unemployment benefits and paid long-term sick leave rose by 2.5 and 3.4 weeks, respectively, corresponding to an average additional annual cost per worker of approximately 420 and 770, respectively. Longer case-processing time was significantly associated with lower degree of employment and higher levels of unemployment and sick leave. CONCLUSIONS: OCD has a significant negative impact on employment and economics, thus highlighting the need for a national, strategic action plan for effective prevention of OCD.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/economics , Dermatitis, Occupational/economics , Employment/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Adult , Cost of Illness , Denmark/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Registries , UnemploymentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unemployment is associated with a high risk of experiencing mental illness. This can lead to stigmatisation, reduced quality of life, and long-term costs like increased healthcare expenditure and productivity losses for society as a whole. Previous research indicates evidence for an association between unemployment and higher mental health service costs, but there is insufficient information available for the German healthcare system. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to identify costs and cost drivers for health and social service use among unemployed people with mental health problems in Germany. METHODS: A sample of 270 persons participated at baseline and six-month-follow-up. Healthcare and social service use was assessed using the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory. Descriptive cost analysis was performed. Associations between costs and potential cost drivers were tested using structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Direct mean costs for 12 months range from EUR 1265.13 (somatic costs) to EUR 2206.38 (psychiatric costs) to EUR 3020.70 (total costs) per person. Path coefficients indicate direct positive effects from the latent variable mental health burden (MHB) on stigma stress, somatic symptoms, and sick leave. DISCUSSION: The hypothesis that unemployed people with mental health problems seek help for somatic symptoms rather than psychiatric symptoms was not supported. Associations between MHB and costs strongly mediated by sick leave indicate a central function of healthcare provision as being confirmation of the inability to work. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Targeted interventions to ensure early help-seeking and reduce stigma remain of key importance in reducing long-term societal costs. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Future research should explore attitudes regarding effective treatment for the target group.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Social Stigma , Unemployment/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence and factors associated with paid sick leave benefits among direct service providers who work with people experiencing homelessness. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using an online survey disseminated during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. METHODS: Survey data from 572 direct service providers working in the homeless, supportive housing, and harm reduction service sectors were analyzed for this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine predictors of paid sick leave benefits. RESULTS: One hundred one (17.7%) participants did not have any paid sick leave benefits. In the univariate models, paid sick leave was associated with older age, greater family income, full-time work, specific employment settings (supportive housing and not emergency shelters or harm reduction programs), having a regular medical doctor, and fewer occupational impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Older age, full-time work, and non-receipt of emergency financial benefits remained statistically significant predictors in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of service providers working with people experiencing homelessness have some amount of paid sick leave benefits, there is a precariously employed subset of individuals who are younger and working part-time in the sector. Temporary expansion of paid sick leave and removal of waiting periods for new employees to qualify for benefits are recommended.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Ill-Housed Persons , Pandemics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Harm Reduction , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Sick Leave/economicsABSTRACT
We assessed determinants of work attendance during the first 3 days after onset of acute respiratory illness (ARI) among workers 19-64 years of age who had medically attended ARI or influenza during the 2017-2018 influenza season. The total number of days worked included days worked at the usual workplace and days teleworked. Access to paid leave was associated with fewer days worked overall and at the usual workplace during illness. Participants who indicated that employees were discouraged from coming to work with influenza-like symptoms were less likely to attend their usual workplace. Compared with workers without a telework option, those with telework access worked more days during illness overall, but there was no difference in days worked at the usual workplace. Both paid leave benefits and business practices that actively encourage employees to stay home while sick are necessary to reduce the transmission of ARI and influenza in workplaces.
Subject(s)
Presenteeism/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Teleworking , Adult , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Presenteeism/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teleworking/statistics & numerical data , United States , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Little is known about racial variations in the financial impact of cancer care. Using data from a national survey of racially diverse patients with metastatic breast cancer, we examined racial/ethnic patterns in employment and cost-management (i.e., financial coping) behaviors. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Participants reported on socio-demographic characteristics, employment, and financial coping behaviors. We employed adjusted modified Poisson regressions to evaluate racial/ethnic differences in changes in work for pay and financial coping. RESULTS: Our analysis included 1052 respondents from 41 states, including Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB, 9%), Hispanics (7%), Asians/Pacific Islanders/Native Hawaiians (API/NH, 10%), American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN, 8%), and Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW, 66%). In adjusted analyses comparing NHWs with patients of color, patients of color were more likely to take unpaid leave (NHB Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] = 2.27; 95% CI 1.54, 3.34), take paid leave (Hispanic ARR = 2.27; 95% CI 1.54, 1.29), stop work (AI/AN ARR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.05, 1.41), and reduce work hours (AI/AN ARR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.14, 1.57). Patients of color were more likely than NHWs to stop treatment (NHB ARR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.08, 1.39), borrow money from friends/family (Hispanic ARR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.25, 2.44), skip other medical bills (API/NH ARR = 2.02; 95% CI 1.54, 2.63), and skip non-medical bills (AI/AN ARR = 1.67 95% CI 1.06, 2.63). Non-Hispanic Whites more commonly reported using savings or skipping a vacation to help manage costs. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences exist in employment changes and financial coping among metastatic breast cancer patients, with patients of color experiencing worse consequences. Equity must be a guiding principle in strategies addressing financial burden during cancer care.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Employment/economics , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , United States/ethnologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the 24-month cost-effectiveness of supervised treatment compared to written advice in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: 100 adults with moderate-severe OA not eligible for total knee replacement (TKR) randomized to a 12-week individualized, supervised treatment (exercise, education, diet, insoles and pain medication) or written advice. Effectiveness was measured as change in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from baseline to 24 months, including data from baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, while healthcare costs and transfer payments were derived from national registries after final follow-up. Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis resampling existing data was conducted and the probability of cost-effectiveness was estimated using a 22,665 Euros/QALY threshold. In a sensitivity analysis, cost-effectiveness was calculated for different costs of the supervised treatment (actual cost in study; cost in private practice; and in-between cost). RESULTS: Average costs were similar between groups (6,758 Euros vs 6,880 Euros), while the supervised treatment were close to being more effective (incremental effect (95% CI) of 0.075 (-0.005 to 0.156). In the primary analysis excluding deaths, this led the supervised treatment to be cost-effective, compared to written advice. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were sensitive to changes in the cost of treatment, but in all scenarios the supervised treatment was cost-effective (ICERs of 6,229 to 20,688 Euros/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: From a 24-month perspective, a 12-week individualized, supervised treatment program is cost-effective compared to written advice in patients with moderate-severe knee OA not eligible for TKR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01535001.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Exercise Therapy/methods , Health Care Costs , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Aged , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark , Diet Therapy/economics , Diet Therapy/methods , Exercise Therapy/economics , Female , Foot Orthoses/economics , Humans , Ibuprofen/economics , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Motivational Interviewing , Osteoarthritis, Knee/economics , Overweight/diet therapy , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objectives. To examine public support for health insurance, income support, and unemployment policies during the initial phase of disease transmission and economic distress following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and to assess varying public support based on beliefs about the role of government.Methods. We fielded a nationally representative survey of US adults (n = 1468) from April 7, 2020, to April 13, 2020.Results. Of US adults, 77% supported paid sick leave, and a majority also supported universal health insurance, an increased minimum wage, and various unemployment support policies. Public support for an active government role in society to improve citizens' lives increased by 10 percentage points during this initial pandemic response relative to September 2019. Belief in a strong governmental role in society was associated with greater support for social safety-net policies.Conclusions. During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in early April 2020, most US adults favored a range of safety-net policies to ameliorate its negative health and economic consequences. For most safety-net policies, public support was highest among those favoring a stronger governmental role in society.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Public Assistance/trends , Public Policy/trends , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sick Leave/economics , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare total costs for hospital stay and post-operative recovery between robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer provided in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. Costs were evaluated in relation to health impact, taking a societal perspective. METHODS: Cost analysis was based on data from an open randomized controlled trial in an ERAS setting at a Swedish tertiary referral university hospital: 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for surgery between February 2012 and May 2016 were included; 25 women were allocated to robotic and 25 to abdominal hysterectomy. We compared the total time in the operating theater, procedure costs, post-operative care, length of hospital stay, readmissions, informal care, and sick leave as well as the health-related quality of life until 6 weeks after surgery. The comparison was made by using the EuroQoL group form with five dimensions and three levels (EQ-5D). The primary outcome measure was total cost; secondary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY. The costs were calculated in Swedish Krona (SEK). RESULTS: Age (median (IQR) 68 (63-72) vs 67 (59-75) years), duration of hospital stay (ie, time to discharge criteria were met) (median (IQR) 36 (36-36) vs 36 (36-54) hours), and sick leave (median (IQR) 25 (17-30) vs 31 (36-54) days) did not differ between the robotic and abdominal group. Time of surgery was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the abdominal group (median (IQR) 70 (60-90) vs 56 (49-84) min; p<0.05). The robotic group recovered significantly faster as measured by the EQ-5D health index and gained 0.018 QALYs until 6 weeks after surgery. Total costs were 20% higher for the robotic procedure (SEK71 634 vs SEK59 319). The total cost per QALY gained for women in the robotic group was slightly under SEK700 000. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic hysterectomy used in an ERAS setting in the treatment of early endometrial cancer improved health within 6 weeks after the operation at a high cost for the health gained compared with abdominal hysterectomy. The productivity loss and informal care were lower for robotic hysterectomy, while healthcare had a higher procedure cost that could not be offset by the higher cost due to complications in the abdominal group.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hysterectomy/economics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Length of Stay/economics , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Sick Leave/economics , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Occupational skin diseases (OSDs) are the most common work-related diseases in Germany and responsible for a large individual and financial burden. Therefore, a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP) is offered to patients with severe OSD who are at increased risk of abandoning their profession. OBJECTIVES: To define cost of illness (COI) of OSD in Germany and to economically evaluate the TIP from a societal perspective. METHODS: In this study, data on patients taking part in the TIP (September 2005 to December 2009) were collected. Sociodemographic and medical data, costs, disease severity (Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index), and quality of life (QoL; Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. COI and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed with a simulated control group. RESULTS: In the analysis, 1041 patients were included. Intervention costs per person were 15 009 with decreasing COI over time. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio revealed expenses per patient of 8942 for a reduction in severity level and 9093 for an improvement in QoL in the base case. Considering costs for retraining, the break-even point is reached if the TIP prevents retraining in approximately 64% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased COI in this long-term evaluation indicates that the TIP is cost-effective in patients with severe OSD.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Dermatitis, Occupational/economics , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Tertiary Prevention/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/therapy , Diagnostic Services/economics , Direct Service Costs , Drug Costs , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Sick Leave/economics , Young AdultABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to provide a detailed overview of age and gender specific health care costs and costs due to lost productivity for hospital admitted patients with an isolated tibia shaft fracture in The Netherlands between 2008 and 2012. Injury cases and length of hospital stay were extracted from the National Medical Registration. Information on extramural health care and work absence were retrieved from a patient follow-up survey on health care use. Medical costs included ambulance care, in- hospital care, general practitioner care, home care, physical therapy, and rehabilitation/nursing care. An incidence-based cost model was applied to calculate direct health care costs and lost productivity in 2012. Total direct health care costs for all patients admitted with a tibia shaft fracture (n = 1,635) were 13.6 million. Costs for productivity loss were 23.0 million. Total costs (direct health care and lost productivity) per patient were highest for men aged 40-49 years mainly due to lost productivity, and for women aged > 80 years, due to high direct medical costs.
Subject(s)
Global Burden of Disease/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization , Sick Leave , Tibial Fractures , Absenteeism , Age Factors , Disability Evaluation , Efficiency , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Tibial Fractures/economics , Tibial Fractures/epidemiology , Tibial Fractures/therapy , Work Capacity EvaluationABSTRACT
Having asthma is a chronic condition that requires both acute and preventive care as a vital component of asthma action plans. This study looks at how having access to paid sick leave days may be important to adherence to asthma action plans. Does having paid sick days facilitate preventive care, help people avoid acute asthma incidents, reduce the number of lost work days, reduce the cost of care, and lessen financial worry among asthma sufferers? This research builds on a growing body of literature that has established a relationship between paid sick leave days and preventive and acute health care use and outcomes and yet is the first of its kind to examine the relationship specifically between asthma and paid sick leave. This study used secondary data analysis to examine the relationship between six outcome variables categories and having paid sick leave in a nationally representative sample of N = 1,676 working U.S. adults in the National Health Interview Survey. Workers without paid sick leave benefits were significantly more likely to report they were worried about finances and struggle to afford their prescription medication compared to their counterparts who have paid sick leave benefits. Examined in light of past findings, workers with asthma who lack paid sick leave are in a precarious situation where they have increased worry likely due in part to reduced take-home pay due to unpaid sick days and increased medical expenses. There was no relationship between having paid sick leave and the receipt of preventive asthma care, measures of asthma control, receipt of patient education, and asthma medication use. Implications for policy and practice are put forth.
Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence/psychology , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , United StatesABSTRACT
It has long been the goal of many gerontological social work scholars to increase the ability and opportunity for people to be engaged in paid and unpaid work throughout the life course. Yet the COVID-19 pandemic is revealing and exacerbating the financial insecurity of many older adults. In this paper, we review information related to older workers and how they might be affected by this pandemic and its aftermath, paying particular attention to the most socioeconomically and physically vulnerable older workers. We also offer first-hand experiences from our careers working with and conducting scholarship on older workers, paying particular attention to recent actions by many in the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) network to provide paid sick leave to its low-income, older adult participants. We conclude with implications for social work scholarship and teaching, noting the uptick in technology use among older adults and the disparities that remain, as well as teaching that integrates discussions on the lifelong and cumulative effects of inequalities and marginalization and the need for additional researcher, student, and community collaborations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Employment/organization & administration , Geriatrics/organization & administration , Social Work/organization & administration , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ageism/psychology , Employment/economics , Employment/psychology , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Pandemics , Poverty , SARS-CoV-2 , Sick Leave/economics , Social IsolationABSTRACT
Many living kidney donors undertake a significant financial burden in order to donate. We studied the association between time to return to work and reported financial burden. Kidney donors who donated from 2/2005 through 12/2015 (n = 1012) were surveyed 6 months after donation and asked about occupation, time to return to work, and financial burden (on a 10-point Likert scale). Of 856 donors working for pay, 629 (73%) responded. After adjusting for donor characteristics, increased length of time to return to work was a significant predictor of financial burden (P < .001). It is notable that those in manual/skilled trade occupations, compared with all other occupations, experienced greater financial burden for each week away from work (P = .003). Older age at donation and nondirected (vs directed) donation were associated with significantly decreased financial burden. These observations provide additional information to better inform donor candidates, and further emphasize the need to develop policies so that living kidney donation can be financially neutral.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/economics , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/economics , Return to Work , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Kidney , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , United StatesABSTRACT
Low back pain is the leading worldwide cause of years lost to disability and its burden is growing alongside the increasing and ageing population.1 Because these population shifts are more rapid in low-income and middle-income countries, where adequate resources to address the problem might not exist, the effects will probably be more extreme in these regions. Most low back pain is unrelated to specific identifiable spinal abnormalities, and our Viewpoint, the third paper in this Lancet Series,2,3 is a call for action on this global problem of low back pain.
Subject(s)
Income/trends , Low Back Pain/complications , Low Back Pain/prevention & control , Sick Leave/economics , Awareness , Cost of Illness , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Efficiency , Exercise/physiology , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Life Style , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/therapy , Obesity/epidemiology , Pain Management/methods , Self-Management/methods , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Functional outcome measures are important as most patients survive trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the long-term impact of trauma within a healthcare region from a social perspective. METHODS: People active in work or education and admitted to hospitals in Central Norway in the interval 1 June 2007 to 31 May 2010 after sustaining trauma were included in the study. Clinical data were linked to Norwegian national registers of cause of death, sickness and disability benefits, employment and education. Primary outcome measures were receipt of medical benefits and time to return to preinjury work level. Secondary outcome measures were mortality within 30 days or during follow-up. RESULTS: Some 1191 patients were included in the study, of whom 193 (16·2 per cent) were severely injured (Injury Severity Score greater than 15). Five years after injury, the prevalence of medical benefits was 15·6 per cent among workers with minor injuries, 22·3 per cent in those with moderate injuries and 40·5 per cent among workers with severe injuries. The median time after injury until return to work was 1, 4 and 11 months for patients with minor, moderate and severe injuries respectively. Twelve patients died within 30 days and an additional 17 (1·4 per cent) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing minor or major trauma received high levels of medical benefits; however, most recovered within the first year and resumed preinjury work activity. Patients with severe trauma were more likely to receive medical benefits and have a delayed return to work. Registration number: NCT02602405 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).