Risk factors for severe hearing loss in Susac syndrome: A national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nonreversible hearing loss (HL) is the main sequelae of Susac syndrome (SuS). We aimed to identify risk factors for HL in SuS. METHODS: The CARESS study is a prospective national cohort study that started in December 2011, including all consecutive patients with SuS referred to the French reference center. The CARESS study was designed with a follow-up including fundoscopy, audiometry, and brain magnetic resonance imaging at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis and then annually for 5 years. The primary outcome was the occurrence at last follow-up of severe HL defined as the loss of 70 dB in at least one ear on audiometry or the need for hearing aids. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (female 66.7%, median age 37.5 [range 24.5-42.5] years) included in the clinical study were analyzed for the primary outcome. Thirty-three patients (91.7%) had cochleovestibular involvement at SuS diagnosis including HL >20 dB in at least one ear in 25 cases. At diagnosis, 32 (88.9%), 11 (30.6%), and 7 (19.4%) patients had received steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or immunosuppressive (IS) drugs, respectively. After a median follow-up of 51.8 [range 29.2-77.6] months, 19 patients (52.8%) experienced severe HL that occurred a median of 13 [range 1.5-29.5] months after diagnosis. Multivariable analysis showed that the odds of severe HL were lower in patients who received IS drugs at diagnosis (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-1.07, p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Severe HL in SuS is associated with the absence of IS drugs given at diagnosis. Our findings support the systematic use of IS drugs in SuS.

Cognitive outcomes in Susac syndrome: A 2-year neuropsychological follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare, autoimmune, neurological disease characterized by a clinical triad of branch retinal artery occlusion, sensorineural hearing loss and encephalopathy. Neuropsychological functioning in SuS is little researched and the prevalence, nature, and evolution over time of cognitive deficits in SuS remain unclear. This study aimed to better understand the long-term neuropsychological outcomes of patients with SuS. METHODS: Thirteen patients with SuS (mean [SD] age 39.5 [11.1] years) were enrolled at the Ghent University Hospital by their treating neurologist. The cognitive functioning and emotional well-being of each patient was evaluated by means of a thorough neuropsychological test battery at baseline and after 2 years. Follow-up testing after 2 years was performed in 11 patients (mean [SD] age 42.2 [11.5] years). RESULTS: Patients showed normal neuropsychological test results at a group level, both at baseline and follow-up testing. Significant improvements over time were found for information processing speed, verbal recognition, and semantic and phonological fluency. Individual test results showed interindividual variability at baseline, with most impairments being in attention, executive functioning and language, which improved after a 2-year period. In addition, patients reported significantly lower mental and physical well-being, both at baseline and follow-up testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that neuropsychological dysfunction in SuS is limited at a group level and improves over time. Nonetheless, individual test results reveal interindividual variability, making cognitive screening essential. Furthermore, a high psycho-emotional burden of the disease was reported, for which screening and follow-up are necessary.

Central intra-lesional iron deposits as a possible novel imaging marker at 7 Tesla MRI in Susac Syndrome - an exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare autoimmune disease that leads to hearing impairment, visual field deficits, and encephalopathy due to an occlusion of precapillary arterioles in the brain, retina, and inner ear. Given the potentially disastrous outcome and difficulties in distinguishing SuS from its differential diagnoses, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), our exploratory study aimed at identifying potential new SuS-specific neuroimaging markers. METHODS: Seven patients with a definite diagnosis of SuS underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 Tesla (7T), including T2* weighted and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) sequences. T2 weighted hyperintense lesions were analyzed with regard to number, volume, localization, central vein sign, T1 hypointensity, and focal iron deposits in the center of SuS lesions ("iron dots"). Seven T MRI datasets from the same institute, comprising 75 patients with, among others, MS, served as controls. RESULTS: The "iron dot" sign was present in 71.4% (5/7) of the SuS patients, compared to 0% in our control cohort. Thus, sensitivity was 71.4% and specificity 100%. A central vein sign was only incidentally detected. CONCLUSION: We are the first to demonstrate this type of "iron dot" lesions on highly resolving 7T T2*w and QSM images in vivo as a promising neuroimaging marker of SuS, corroborating previous histopathological ex vivo findings.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in refractory Susac's syndrome: A brief report.

Susac's syndrome (SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy that typically presents with the clinical triad of encephalopathy, hearing loss, and branch retinal artery occlusion. It has a wide range of possible presentations, and its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Fulminant and refractory cases are difficult to treat, and no standard treatment protocol has been established. However, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been described as an adjunctive therapy in several SuS cases. Herein we present a case of a 63-year-old male with debilitating encephalopathy and recent hearing and vision loss, who responded favorably to TPE. Given this and other published reports of plasma exchange therapy for SuS, treatment protocols should consider TPE in early stages of disease.

Ophthalmological Outcomes in Patients with Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To report ophthalmological outcomes and treatment regimen in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with Susac syndrome treated between November 2015 and March 2023. Multimodal imaging findings, ophthalmic examination data, information on neurological and sensorineural involvement, and therapeutic regimen were reviewed. Visual acuity was recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Ophthalmological manifestations and disease severity were assessed using the previously described clinical activity score (CAS). RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac syndrome m : f = 5 : 5 were identified. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 ± 23.3 months (range 1 to 78 months). The mean age was 41.4 ± 13.8 years (range 21 to 59 years). At baseline, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR. At the last follow-up, CDVA improved to 0.00 ± 0.03 logMAR (p = 0.029). Three of 20 eyes showed an improvement of 5 letters, while no loss of visual acuity was recorded during the follow-up time. Baseline CAS was 10.65 ± 12.69, and CAS at the last follow-up was 5.15 ± 5.49 (p = 0.068). Except for one patient, all were initially treated with intravenous (i. v.) steroids and subsequent oral tapering. Depending on the treatment response, cyclophosphamide (n = 4), i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIGs) (n = 4), anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 3), or plasmapheresis (n = 1) were applied. All patients under treatment for more than 1 month (n = 9) showed improvement in CAS and CDVA. CONCLUSION: Susac syndrome is a rare autoimmune vascular endotheliopathy. Treatment of Susac syndrome appears to result in improving CAS and CDVA. The majority of patients, in addition to the systemic steroids, required systemic immunosuppressive agents. Interdisciplinary communication is crucial to reduce the time to diagnosis and initiation of therapy in patients with Susac syndrome.

Clinically relevant increases in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in patients with Susac syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are promising neuro-axonal damage and astrocytic activation biomarkers. Susac syndrome (SS) is an increasingly recognized neurological condition and biomarkers that can help assess and monitor disease evolution are highly needed for the adequate management of these patients. sNfL and sGFAP levels were evaluated in patients with SS and their clinical relevance in the relapse and remission phase of the disease was assessed. METHODS: As part of a multicentre study that enrolled patients diagnosed with SS from six international centres, sNfL and sGFAP levels were assessed in 22 SS patients (nine during a relapse and 13 in remission) and 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using SimoaTM assay Neurology 2-Plex B Kit. RESULTS: Serum NfL levels were higher than those of healthy controls (p < 0.001) in SS patients and in both subgroups of patients in relapse and in remission (p < 0.001 for both), with significantly higher levels in relapse than in remission (p = 0.008). sNfL levels showed a negative correlation with time from the last relapse (r = -0.663; p = 0.001). sGFAP levels were slightly higher in the whole group of patients than in healthy controls (p = 0.046) and were more pronounced in relapse than in remission (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In SS patients, both sNFL and sGFAP levels increased compared with healthy controls. Both biomarkers had higher levels during clinical relapse and much lower levels in remission. sNFL was shown to be time sensitive to clinical changes and can be useful to monitor neuro-axonal damage in SS.

Susac syndrome: challenges in the diagnosis and treatment.

Susac syndrome is a disorder thought to be mediated by an autoimmune response towards endothelial cells, leading to a characteristic clinical triad of encephalopathy, visual disturbances due to branch arterial occlusions and sensorineural hearing impairment. Although it is a rare disease, three reasons make it important. First, given its variable presentation, Susac syndrome is underdiagnosed. Second, it is considered an important differential diagnosis in different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders, and consequently is frequently misdiagnosed. Third, in many cases, Susac syndrome is diagnosed and treated late, with significant irreversible sequelae including dementia, blindness and hearing loss. Neuropathology findings derived from both Susac syndrome patient tissue and novel transgenic mouse models indicate cytotoxic CD8+ T cells adhere to microvessels, inducing endothelial cell swelling, vascular narrowing and occlusion, causing microinfarcts. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies are present in serum in 25% of Susac syndrome patients, but it is unclear whether they are aetiologically related to the disease, or an epiphenomenon. The clinical triad comprising encephalopathy, branch arterial occlusions, and sensorineural hearing impairment is considered pathognomonic, although great variability is found in presentation and natural course of disease. At first evaluation, only 13-30% of patients exhibit the full clinical triad, making diagnosis difficult. Retinal fluorescein angiography, optic coherence tomography, MRI and tonal audiometry are helpful methods for diagnosing and monitoring disease activity during treatment. By contrast, there are no reliable objective immune markers to monitor disease activity. Immunosuppression is the current treatment, with high-dose corticosteroid therapy as the mainstay, but additional therapies such as intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are often necessary, because the disease can be devastating, causing irreversible organ damage. Unfortunately, low rates of disease, variability in presentation and paucity of objective biomarkers make prospective controlled clinical trials for Susac syndrome treatment difficult. Current immunosuppressive treatments are therefore based on empirical evidence, mainly from retrospective case series and expert opinion. In this review, we draw attention to the need to take consider Susac syndrome in the differential diagnosis of different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders. Furthermore, we summarize our current knowledge of this syndrome, in reference to its pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, emphasizing the need for prospective and controlled studies that allow a better therapeutic approach.

Fluorescein Angiography Findings in Susac Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is a vasculopathy, resulting in the classic triad of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), inner ear ischemia, and brain ischemia. In this retrospective chart review, we characterize fluorescein angiography (FA) findings and other ancillary studies in Susac syndrome, including the appearance of persistent disease activity and the occurrence of new subclinical disease on FA. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective case series was institutional review board-approved and included patients with the complete triad of Susac syndrome evaluated with FA, contrasted MRI of the brain, and audiometry from 2010 to 2020. The medical records were reviewed for these ancillary tests, along with demographics, symptoms, visual acuity, visual field defects, and findings on fundoscopy. Clinical relapse was defined as any objective evidence of disease activity during the follow-up period after initial induction of clinical quiescence. The main outcome measure was the sensitivity of ancillary testing, including FA, MRI, and audiometry, to detect relapse. RESULTS: Twenty of the 31 (64%) patients had the complete triad of brain, retinal, and vestibulocochlear involvement from Susac syndrome and were included. Median age at diagnosis was 43.5 years (range 21-63), and 14 (70%) were women. Hearing loss occurred in 20 (100%), encephalopathy in 13 (65%), vertigo in 15 (75%), and headaches in 19 (95%) throughout the course of follow-up. Median visual acuity at both onset and final visit was 20/20 in both eyes. Seventeen (85%) had BRAO at baseline, and 10 (50%) experienced subsequent BRAO during follow-up. FA revealed nonspecific leakage from previous arteriolar damage in 20 (100%), including in patients who were otherwise in remission. Of the 11 episodes of disease activity in which all testing modalities were performed, visual field testing/fundoscopy was abnormal in 4 (36.4%), MRI brain in 2 (18.2%), audiogram in 8 (72.7%), and FA in 9 (81.8%). CONCLUSIONS: New leakage on FA is the most sensitive marker of active disease. Persistent leakage represents previous damage, whereas new areas of leakage suggest ongoing disease activity that requires consideration of modifying immunosuppressive therapy.

Leptomeningeal enhancement on post-contrast FLAIR images for early diagnosis of Susac syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) is a key feature of Susac syndrome (SuS) but is only occasionally depicted on post-contrast T1-weighted images (T1-WI). OBJECTIVE: As post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) may be more sensitive, our aim was to assess LME in SuS on this sequence. METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, 20 patients with definite SuS diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled in this multicentre study. Two radiologists independently assessed the number of LME on post-contrast FLAIR and T1-WI acquisitions performed before any treatment. A chi-square test was used to compare both sequences and the interrater agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) were performed before treatment, including 19 post-contrast FLAIR images in 17 patients and 25 post-contrast T1-WI in 19 patients. In terms of patients, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (17/17 (100%) vs. 15/19 (79%), p < 0.05). In terms of sequences, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (19/19 (100%) vs. 16/25 (64%), p < 0.005). LME was disseminated at both supratentorial (19/19) and infratentorial (18/19) levels on post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (3/25 and 9/25, respectively). Interrater agreement was excellent for post-contrast FLAIR (κ = 0.95) but only moderate for post-contrast T1-WI (κ = 0.61). CONCLUSION: LME was always observed and easily visible on post-contrast FLAIR images prior to SuS treatment. In association with other MRI features, it is highly indicative of SuS.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging lesion load at diagnosis, severity at onset and outcomes in Susac syndrome: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare occlusive microvessel disease of the brain, retina and inner ear. We aimed to determine whether brain lesion load at the acute phase predicts poor outcomes in SuS. METHODS: A prospective national cohort study was conducted from December 2012 to December 2019 in 20 centres in France. Patients included at the principal investigator's center with available brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at diagnosis were analyzed. MRI was reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist blinded to clinical status. The size, topography and number of hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-HL) were analyzed at diagnosis and during follow-up. Outcomes involved descriptive characteristics of patients at onset and last follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (38.1 [18.8-56.5] years, 16 females) were prospectively studied. The triad (i.e., brain, eye and ear involvement) was complete at onset in 17 patients. Brain MRI was performed 1.1 (0.1-3.4) months after the first symptom. All patients had DWI-HL at the acute phase. Patients were separated into two groups according to the number of DWI-HL on first MRI: a first group of patients (n=15) displaying low brain lesion load (<50 DWI-HL per patient) and a second group of patients (n=8) displaying high brain lesion load (≥100 DWI-HL). The median follow-up was 57.9 (9.7-98) months. Clinical features, treatment, relapse rate, time to disappearance of DWI-HL, disabilities and professional outcome did not differ according to brain lesion load. CONCLUSION: Brain lesion load assessed by DWI at the acute phase is not associated with risks of disability in SuS.

Diagnosis, differential diagnosis and misdiagnosis of Susac syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Susac syndrome (SuS) is an inflammatory condition of the brain, eye and ear. Diagnosis can be challenging, and misdiagnosis is common. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the medical records of 32 adult patients from an Australasian cohort of SuS patients. RESULTS: An alternative diagnosis prior to SuS was made in 30 patients (94%) with seven patients receiving two or more diagnoses. The median time to diagnosis of SuS was 3 months (range 0.5-100 months). The commonest misdiagnoses were migraine in 10 patients (31%), cerebral vasculitis in six (19%), multiple sclerosis in five (16%) and stroke in five (16%). Twenty-two patients were treated for alternative diagnoses, 10 of whom had further clinical manifestations prior to SuS diagnosis. At presentation seven patients (22%) met criteria for definite SuS, 19 (59%) for probable SuS and six (19%) for possible SuS. Six patients (19%) presented with brain-eye-ear involvement, 14 with brain-ear (44%), six with brain-eye (19%) and six (19%) with only brain involvement. In patients with the complete triad of symptoms the median delay to diagnosis was 3 months (range 1-9 months) compared to 5.25 months (range 0.5-100 months) for patients with encephalopathy and ocular symptoms at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Susac syndrome patients are frequently misdiagnosed at initial presentation, despite many having symptoms or radiological features that are red flags for the diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can lead to patient morbidity. The varied ways in which SuS can present, and clinician failure to consider or recognize SuS, appear to be the main factors leading to misdiagnosis.

Involuntary crying episodes with Susac's syndrome-a rare presentation of a rare disease: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In this case, we reported the pseudobulbar affect (PBA) in a patient with Susac's syndrome-a rare condition that was caused by a rare syndrome. Previous case reports of Susac syndrome described psychiatric symptoms such as emotional disturbances or personality changes. Only a few case reports have reported psychiatric disorders in patients with Susac's syndrome. There were no reported cases of Susac syndrome with PBA as an initial presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient was 56 years old and presented with involuntary crying, left-sided headache, left-sided hearing loss, and tinnitus. Brain MRI showed numerous areas of restricted diffusion and enhancement involving the corpus callosum, bilateral hemispheres, and brainstem. Ophthalmological evaluation showed bilateral branch retinal artery occlusion. She was diagnosed with Susac's syndrome and PBA. She was treated with cyclophosphamide and dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidine sulfate with excellent recovery. This is a 2-year clinical course. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of the clinical presentation of Susac's syndrome and PBA with early diagnosis and treatment are the keys to preventing further disability and impact on patients and their families.

Characteristics and management of Susac syndrome in an emergent country: a multi-center case series from Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare endotheliopathy with an estimated prevalence of 0.14-0.024 per 100,000. It is an important differential diagnosis in demyelinating disorders. There are few case series and no large randomized controlled trials, and most reports come from developed countries. We report six cases of SS in three centers in Brazil and discuss management challenges in emergent countries. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with SS in three medical centers in Brazil between April 2018 and July 2021. The European Susac consortium (EuSaC) criteria were used for diagnosis of SS. Demographic data and clinical interventions were described and outcomes were assessed subjectively and by applying the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on last follow-up. RESULTS: Six patients were diagnosed with SS (3 males, 3 females). Mean age at presentation was 36 years (range 17 to 54). The most common initial symptom was confusion, followed by visual impairment and hearing loss. Characteristic snowball lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were present in four patients (66%). Retinal artery abnormalities were present in half (3/6) of patients, and sensorineural hearing loss was present in four patients (66%). Outcome was favorable (mRS ≤ 2) in five patients (86%). Patients treated early had a more favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Emergent countries face challenges in the diagnosis and management of patients with SS, such as access to advanced tests (fluorescein angiography, serial MRI) and treatment drugs (rituximab, mycophenolate). Further research should consider particularities of patients with SS in emergent countries.

Sudden onset hearing loss as initial presentation of Susac syndrome: a rare case report and brief review.

Susac syndrome is a rare disease presenting with a classic triad of symptoms. These are sensorineural hearing loss, encephalopathy, and branch retinal artery occlusions. Initial presentation is usually headache and symptoms of encephalopathy. Hearing loss is unusual in the early stages but, when it does present, can often lead to a misdiagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Hence, neurological and retinal examinations are essential to an accurate diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to raise awareness of Susac syndrome among physicians and facilitate recognition of its manifestation, especially in those patients presenting with hearing loss alone. Identifying Susac syndrome that presents as sudden sensorineural hearing loss can be challenging but a number of case reviews have been reported in recent years and treatment guidelines are available.

Susac Syndrome: an uncommon cause of impaired vision.

A 35-year-old Caucasian woman presented an abrupt onset of bilateral impaired vision, and arrived to our attention two weeks later. She had a previous episode of mild dizziness. She underwent a fluorescein angiography showing branch retinal artery occlusions and a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealing several supraand infratentorial FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions, two with contrast enhancement. Thrombophilic, autoimmune and infective (including Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Borrelia burgdorferi, Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, Herpes Simplex Virus 1-2, Varicella Zoster Virus) screening was negative. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed intrathecal IgG synthesis. We suspected a Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis, and intravenous steroids were started. Three months later a second brain MRI showed seven new lesions without contrast enhancement, and she revealed a cognitive impairment and bilateral hearing loss. Reviewing the clinical history and MRI, she fulfilled diagnostic criteria for Susac syndrome. She had two cycles of cyclophosphamide, and recovered in 6 months and then remained stable with metotrexate.

Susac Syndrome: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disorder that involves the eyes, the brain, and the ears. It is a rare cause of recurrent branch retinal artery occlusion. The purpose of this study was to report cases of SS, highlighting the clinical presentations, therapeutic options, and their outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients seen at our institution for SS between 2005 and 2020. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome were studied. RESULTS: Four patients (3 females, mean age 29 years old) were included in the study. According to the recently revised diagnostic criteria, three patients had definite and one patient had probable SS (distinctive ophthalmological and brain involvement without ear involvement). Initial visual acuity (VA) was normal in all eyes, but two patients had unilateral visual field impairment. Gass plaques (defined as yellow-white plaques found in the arteriolar wall away from arterial bifurcations) were observed on fundus examination in all patients. Fluorescein angiography revealed arteriolar wall hyperfluorescence and branch retinal arterial occlusions (BRAOs) in the absence of other signs of intraocular inflammation in all patients. Initial treatment consisted of a high-dose corticosteroid (intravenous or oral) with additional immunosuppressive therapy (azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulins, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or cyclophosphamide). Residual symptoms were present in all patients and included scotoma (n = 2) and hearing loss (n = 3). CONCLUSION: SS is a rare disease with characteristic ophthalmological manifestation. The majority of patients present a crude form of the triad, and retinal findings may be the first initial manifestation. Ophthalmologists should consider the possibility of an SS in all young patients presenting with BRAOs.

Susac Syndrome Presenting as Recurrent Strokes.

Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare clinical entity that affects primarily young women and might result in significant morbidity. The triad that leads to suspecting the disease has classically been involvement of the brain, retina and inner ear. The likely pathology of the disease is thought to be immune mediated endotheliopathy; given its clinical and, possibly, pathological remission with immunosuppressive therapy. Here we describe an uncommon recurrent stroke in a young female that unfolds to Susac syndrome at the end. We also reviewed the literature behind diagnosis and treatment. Delayed diagnosis is associated with worse morbidity and mortality, and the most important predictor of long-term prognosis in the reported cases is the time to diagnosis. Therapies tried (with variable success) include corticosteroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab. The prognosis of SS is difficult to predict given the absence of strong clinical or radiographic features to suggest better/worse prognosis at the time of initial diagnosis. Brain MRIs and hearing/vision impairment have never normalized in previously studied cohort of patients.

Susac's syndrome diagnostic difficulties - the neurological point of view.

Susac's syndrome is a rare microangiopathy affecting small vessels of the retina, inner ear and brain. It is characterised by a triad of symptoms: encephalopathy, visual defects, and sensorineural hearing loss. The disease is probably caused by an autoimmune process. Diagnosis is based on the typical symptoms, brain MRI, and, most importantly, fluorescein angiography. It is important to distinguish between Susac's syndrome and multiple sclerosis or migraine with aura, because misdiagnosis leads to the wrong treatment. To date, no detailed guidelines for the treatment of Susac's syndrome have been developed. Immunosuppression seems to be effective. It must be remembered that early and aggressive treatment is crucial, and that delays in diagnosis, and as a result in treatment implementation, worsen the prognosis.

Susac syndrome complicating a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

In 2020 the world was captivated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Current scientific evidence suggests an interaction of SARS-CoV-2 and the human immune system. Multiple cases were reported of patients with COVID-19 presenting with encephalopathy, confusion or agitation, stroke, and other neurologic symptoms. We present a case of a 40-year-old man diagnosed with Susac syndrome after COVID-19, presenting with acute sensorineural hearing loss, encephalopathy, a splenial "snowball-like" lesion, and branch retinal artery occlusions with distal arterial wall hyperintensity. Although the pathophysiology of Susac syndrome remains unclear, this case is in line with the ongoing debate about the influence of SARS-CoV-2 on the human immune system. Corticosteroid treatment was initiated, followed by two treatments with rituximab, with clinical improvement of the symptomatology. Maintenance treatment currently consists of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Future research will need to focus on the underlying mechanisms for COVID-19-associated (autoimmune) complications.

WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SUSAC SYNDROME.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical manifestations and results of key diagnostic investigations in patients with Susac syndrome, with special emphasis on the principal role of fluorescein angiography (FA) of the peripheral retina. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records (collected 2000-2019) of 20 patients (15 women and five men), aged 20 to 51 years (mean age: 31.6 years) with complete or incomplete Susac syndrome diagnosed by an ophthalmic examination and widefield fluorescein angiography (WF-FA) by Spectralis and Optos Tx200. RESULTS: Fluorescein angiography abnormalities included vascular changes in the posterior pole in 64.7% and in the peripheral retina in 82.4%. Widefield FA abnormalities in the peripheral retina alone were seen in 35.3% and in the posterior pole, but without peripheral vascular involvement, in 17.6%. Secondary leakage from veins was noted in 58.8%. CONCLUSION: Widefield FA of the peripheral retina has a key role in cases of suspected Susac syndrome as it confirms the diagnosis and assesses disease activity. In addition to the characteristic findings, late-phase FA revealed leakage from veins which is not a typical sign. Patients experiencing migraine headaches may benefit from increasing awareness of neurologists and otologists who more promptly referred patients with suspected Susac syndrome for ophthalmologic evaluation and WF-FA of the peripheral retina.