Diagnosis of suspected pediatric distal forearm fractures with point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) by pediatric orthopedic surgeons after minimal training.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have advocated the use of ultrasound to diagnose distal forearm fractures in children. However, there is limited data on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons or trainees who manage orthopedic injuries in children. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for pediatric distal forearm fractures when conducted by pediatric surgeons and trainees after minimal training. METHODS: This diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary hospital emergency department in Germany. Participants were children and adolescents under 15 years of age who presented to the emergency department with an acute, suspected, isolated distal forearm fracture requiring imaging. Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training for sonographic fracture diagnosis, performed 6-view distal forearm POCUS on each participant prior to X-ray imaging. All data was retrospectively collected from the hospital's routine digital patient files. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared to X-ray as the reference standard. RESULTS: From February to June 2021, 146 children under 15 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 106 data sets were available for analysis. Regarding the presence of a fracture, X-ray and Wrist-POCUS showed the same result in 99.1%, with 83/106 (78.3%) fractures detected in both modalities and one suspected buckle fracture on POCUS not confirmed in the radiographs. Wrist-POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI [0.956, 1]) and a specificity of 95.8% (95% CI [0.789, 0.999]) compared to radiographs. In 6 cases, there were minor differences regarding a concomitant ulnar buckle. The amount of prior ultrasound training had no influence on the accuracy of Wrist-POCUS for diagnosing distal forearm fractures. All fractures were reliably diagnosed even when captured POCUS images did not meet all quality criteria. CONCLUSION: Pediatric surgeons and trainees, after minimal training in POCUS, had excellent diagnostic accuracy for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents using POCUS compared to X-ray.

Does Early Conversion to Below-elbow Casting for Pediatric Diaphyseal Both-bone Forearm Fractures Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes and ROM?

BACKGROUND: For distal forearm fractures in children, it has been shown that a below-elbow cast is an adequate treatment that overcomes the discomfort of an above-elbow cast and unnecessary immobilization of the elbow. For reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures, our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT)-which compared an above-elbow cast with early conversion to a below-elbow cast-revealed no differences in the risk of redisplacement or functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Although studies with a longer follow-up after diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children are scarce, they are essential, as growth might affect the outcome. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this secondary analysis of an earlier RCT, we asked: (1) Does early conversion from an above-elbow to a below-elbow cast in children with reduced, stable diaphyseal forearm fractures result in worse clinical and radiological outcome? (2) Does a malunion result in inferior clinical outcomes at 7.5 years of follow-up? METHODS: In this study, we evaluated children at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up who were included in a previous RCT. The median (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 years (5.2 to 9.9). The patients for this RCT were included from the emergency departments of four different urban hospitals. Between January 2006 and August 2010, we treated 128 patients for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. All 128 patients were eligible; 24% (31) were excluded because they were lost before the minimum study follow-up or had incomplete datasets, leaving 76% (97) for secondary analysis. The loss in the follow-up group was comparable to the included population. Eligible patients were invited for secondary functional and radiographic assessment. The primary outcome was the difference in forearm rotation compared with the uninjured contralateral arm. Secondary outcomes were the ABILHAND-kids and QuickDASH questionnaire, loss of flexion and extension of the elbow and wrist compared with the contralateral forearm, JAMAR grip strength ratio, and radiological assessment of residual deformity. The study was not blinded regarding the children, parents, and clinicians. RESULTS: At 7.5-year follow-up, there were no differences in ABILHAND-kids questionnaire score (above-elbow cast: 41 ± 2.4 versus above/below-elbow cast: 41.7 ± 0.7, mean difference -0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.4 to 0.04]; p = 0.06), QuickDASH (above-elbow cast: 5.8 ± 9.6 versus 2.9 ± 6.0 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 2.9 [95% CI -0.5 to 6.2]; p = 0.92), and grip strength (0.9 ± 0.2 for above-elbow cast versus 1 ± 0.2 for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference -0.04 [95% CI -1 to 0.03]; p = 0.24). Functional outcomes showed no difference (loss of forearm rotation: above-elbow cast 7.9 ± 17.7 versus 4.1 ± 6.9 for above-/below-elbow cast, mean difference 3.8 [95% CI -1.7 to 9.4]; p = 0.47; arc of motion: above-elbow cast 152° ± 21° versus 155° ± 11° for the above/below-elbow cast group, mean difference -2.5 [95% CI -9.3 to -4.4]; p = 0.17; loss of wrist flexion-extension: above-elbow cast group 1.0° ± 5.0° versus 0.6° ± 4.2° for above/below-elbow cast, mean difference 0.4° [95% CI -1.5° to 2.2°]; p = 0.69). The secondary follow-up showed improvement in forearm rotation in both groups compared with the rotation at 7 months. For radiographical analysis, the only difference was in AP ulna (above-elbow cast: 6° ± 3° versus above/below-elbow cast: 5° ± 2°, mean difference 1.8° [0.7° to 3°]; p = 0.003), although this is likely not clinically relevant. There were no differences in the other parameters. Thirteen patients with persistent malunion at 7-month follow-up showed no clinically relevant differences in functional outcomes at 7.5-year follow-up compared with children without malunion. The loss of forearm rotation was 5.5ׄ° ± 9.1° for the malunion group compared with 6.0° ± 13.9° in the no malunion group, with a mean difference of 0.4 (95% CI of -7.5 to 8.4; p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: In light of these results, we suggest that surgeons perform an early conversion to a below-elbow cast for reduced diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children. This study shows that even in patients with secondary fracture displacement, remodeling occurred. And even in persistent malunion, these patients mostly showed good-to-excellent final results. Future studies, such as a meta-analysis or a large, prospective observational study, would help to establish the influence of skeletal age, sex, and the severity and direction of malunion angulation of both the radius and ulna on clinical result. Furthermore, a similar systematic review could prove beneficial in clarifying the acceptable angulation for pediatric lower extremity fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Surgical intervention for distal radial fractures with concurrent ulnar styloid fractures may be beneficial for the elderly patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are highly prevalent among older adults. Ulnar styloid fractures frequently accompany distal radius fractures, raising concerns about treatment outcomes due to the risk of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. This study investigated the necessity of surgical intervention (open reduction internal fixation; ORIF) for distal radius fractures in very old patients with coexisting ulnar styloid fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 96 patients aged ≥ 80 years with AO classification 23-A2 to 23-B3 distal radius fractures with concomitant ulnar styloid fracture between 2019 and 2022 was performed. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 80 years, had a preinjury Barthel index of < 90, or had high-energy multiple trauma. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. We compared the DASH score and their trajectories between the ORIF and conservative treatment groups. RESULTS: ORIF group demonstrated significantly better DASH functional scores (25.31 ± 4.71) at the 12-month follow-up compared with the conservative group (34.42 ± 8.03; p < 0.001). Treatment choice was identified as a significant predictor of DASH scores at 12 months, with ORIF significantly improved patient's wrist function and demonstrated a ß coefficient of - 9.11 (95% confidence interval: -11.95 to - 6.27, p < 0.001). The other factors investigated, namely age, lowest T-score, and medical history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, cancer, and dementia, did not exhibit a significant association with the 12-month DASH scores in the adjusted model (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that very old patients with distal radius fracture accompanied by ulnar styloid fractures may benefit from ORIF to achieve optimal long-term functional recovery.

Trends and projection of forearm fractures including elbow fractures of the Olecranon in Sweden: an analysis of 363 968 fractures using public aggregated data.

BACKGROUND: Forearm and olecranon fractures are a common orthopaedic injury. This study aimed to analyse whether the incidence of forearm injury is changing and identifying trends in the number of forearm and olecranon fractures using public aggregated data in Sweden. METHODS: The number of forearm and olecranon fractures as defined by the number of registered diagnoses with the ICD-10 code of S52 were collected and normalized per 100,000 inhabitants and stratified per sex, age, and month. Age-adjusted incidence for forearm and olecranon fractures were calculated using the direct method. Poisson regression was used to analyse monthly, seasonal and yearly change in forearm and olecranon fracture incidence. Logistical regression was used to predict future trends of forearm and olecranon fractures. RESULTS: The findings revealed a slight decreasing trend in forearm and olecranon fractures. The average incidence rate during the study period was 333 with women having a higher incidence rate than men. More fractures occurred in the winter months. Fluctuations in the number of forearm and olecranon fractures were observed during 2020 which may be influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on current data, forearm and olecranon fractures are expected to decrease in Sweden by 2035. CONCLUSION: This study describes the trend of forearm and olecranon fractures among individuals according to sex and age in Sweden using easily obtainable data. Trends in forearm and olecranon fractures are dependent on sex and age but generally show a decreasing trend. More precise studies are needed in order to properly quantify the specific incidence of various subtypes of forearm and olecranon fractures and associated risk factors.

Artificial intelligence-based detection of paediatric appendicular skeletal fractures: performance and limitations for common fracture types and locations.

BACKGROUND: Research into artificial intelligence (AI)-based fracture detection in children is scarce and has disregarded the detection of indirect fracture signs and dislocations. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of an existing AI-tool for the detection of fractures, indirect fracture signs, and dislocations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AI software, BoneView (Gleamer, Paris, France), was assessed for diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection using paediatric radiology consensus diagnoses as reference. Radiographs from a single emergency department were enrolled retrospectively going back from December 2021, limited to 1,000 radiographs per body part. Enrolment criteria were as follows: suspected fractures of the forearm, lower leg, or elbow; age 0-18 years; and radiographs in at least two projections. RESULTS: Lower leg radiographs showed 607 fractures. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were high (87.5%, 87.5%, 98.3%, 98.3%, respectively). Detection rate was low for toddler's fractures, trampoline fractures, and proximal tibial Salter-Harris-II fractures. Forearm radiographs showed 1,137 fractures. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were high (92.9%, 98.1%, 98.4%, 91.7%, respectively). Radial and ulnar bowing fractures were not reliably detected (one out of 11 radial bowing fractures and zero out of seven ulnar bowing fractures were correctly detected). Detection rate was low for styloid process avulsions, proximal radial buckle, and complete olecranon fractures. Elbow radiographs showed 517 fractures. Sensitivity and NPV were moderate (80.5%, 84.7%, respectively). Specificity and PPV were high (94.9%, 93.3%, respectively). For joint effusion, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were moderate (85.1%, 85.7%, 89.5%, 80%, respectively). For elbow dislocations, sensitivity and PPV were low (65.8%, 50%, respectively). Specificity and NPV were high (97.7%, 98.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of BoneView is promising for forearm and lower leg fractures. However, improvement is mandatory before clinicians can rely solely on AI-based paediatric fracture detection using this software.

Pediatric distal both-bone forearm fractures treated with percutaneous pinning with or without ulna fixation: a retrospective cohort study from two centres.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of children with distal both-bone forearm fractures treated by fixation of the radius only compared to fixation of both the radius and ulna. METHODS: A total of 71 patients from two centres with distal both-bone forearm fractures (30 in the ulna-yes group, 41 in the ulna-no group) who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning treatment were retrospectively analysed. Operation duration, number of fluoroscopic exposures, loss of reduction rate and angulation based on radiographic assessment were compared between the two groups. Evaluation of wrist function including Gartland-Werley Score and Mayo Wrist Score were compared at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Ulna angulation upon bone healing on the posteroanterior and the lateral plane of ulna-no group (6.11 ± 1.56°; 6.51 ± 1.69°) was significantly greater than that of ulna-yes group (4.49 ± 1.30°; 5.05 ± 2.18°) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the loss of reduction rate between ulna-yes group (6.67%, 2/30) and the ulna-no group (4.88%, 2/41) (p > 0.05). At last follow-up, no significant difference was found between the Gartland-Werley Scores of the ulna-yes group (1.83 ± 3.25, range: 0-16) and ulna-no group (1.85 ± 2.72, range: 0-11.5) (p > 0.05). No significant difference was found between the Mayo Wrist Scores of the ulna-yes group (92.60 ± 6.20) and ulna-no group (92.15 ± 7.58) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For distal both-bone forearm fractures in children, fixation of only the radius appears to be a viable method with equivalent clinical outcomes compared to fixation of both the radius and ulna.

Highly extensile approach for comminuted ulna coronoid process fractures with mini-plate fixation: a case series of 31 patients.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of coronoid process fractures, medial, lateral, anterior, anteromedial, and posterior approaches have been increasingly reported; however, there is no general consensus on the method of fixation of coronal fractures. Here, we present a highly-extensile minimally invasive approach to treat coronoid process fractures using a mini-plate that can achieve anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and anterior capsular repair. Further, the study aimed to determine the complication rate of the anterior minimally invasive approach and to evaluate functional and clinical patient-reported outcomes during follow-up. METHODS: Thirty-one patients diagnosed with coronoid fractures accompanied with a "terrible triad" or posteromedial rotational instability between April 2012 and October 2018 were included in the analysis. Anatomical reduction and mini-plate fixation of coronoid fractures were performed using an anterior minimally invasive approach. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, range of motion (ROM), and the visual analog score (VAS). The time of fracture healing and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 26.7 months (range, 14-60 months). The average time to radiological union was 3.6 ± 1.3 months. During the follow-up period, the average elbow extension was 6.8 ± 2.9° while the average flexion was 129.6 ± 4.6°. According to Morrey's criteria, 26 (81%) elbows achieved a normal desired ROM. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPI score was 98 ± 3.3 points. There were no instances of elbow instability, elbow joint stiffness, subluxation or dislocation, infection, blood vessel complications, or nerve palsy. Overall, 10 elbows (31%) experienced heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSION: An anterior minimally invasive approach allows satisfactory fixation of coronoid fractures while reducing incision complications due to over-dissection of soft tissue injuries. In addition, this incision does not compromise the soft tissue stability of the elbow joint and allows the patient a more rapid return to rehabilitation exercises.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures - a retrospective analysis of 201 cases.

BACKGROUND: Forearm shaft fractures are common injuries, often caused by falling from a fully-upright position or falling off a bike. They can be treated nonoperatively or surgically with intramedullary nailing or plates. The method of choice for treating pediatric forearm shaft fractures is the application of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN)|. The aim of the study was to evaluate ESIN in pediatric patients with forearm shaft fractures based on radiological images, and determine the etiology and complication rate associated with the injury. METHODS: The study included 201 patients, 30.5% female 69.5% male, aged 1 to 17 years (mean 9.1 years; SD = 3.2), all had been diagnosed with a fracture of the forearm shaft and had been treated surgically with ESIN. In addition, all possessed a complete set of X-ray images and had attended a minimum six-month follow-up examination of the forearm. Axial alignment was evaluated retrospectively in the anatomical (AP) and lateral (LAT) positions. In total, 402 radiographs were examined. Of the injuries, 68% occurred during sports activity and 75% involved both the radius and the ulna. RESULTS: Union was observed in all cases. Mean axial alignment values in AP and LAT X-ray or both the ulna and radius were satisfactory. Axial alignment values were not influenced significantly by age, type of surgery, type of fracture or etiology. Plaster cast application (9.8% of cases) significantly influenced radius axial alignment. The complication rate was 11.4% (n = 23). Significantly more complications were observed in patients receiving open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (p = 0.0025). CONCLUSION: The ESIN technique is an effective treatment for forearm diaphyseal fractures in children, with good results regarding reduction and bone healing, indicated by x-ray.

Does the coronoid fracture in terrible triad injury always need to be fixed?

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of terrble triad injuries and whether fixation of coronoid process fractures is needed or not are still debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if terrible triad injuries necessitate coronoid fracture fixation and evaluate if non-fixation treatments have similar efficacies and outcomes as fixation-treatments in cases of terrible triad injuries. METHODS: From August 2011 to July 2020, 23 patients with acute terrible triad injuries without involvement of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were included to evaluate the postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (minimum follow-up of 20 months). According to the preoperative height loss evaluation of the coronoid process and an intraoperative elbow stability test, seven patients underwent coronoid fracture fixation, and the other eight patients were treated conservatively. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and modified Broberg-Morrey score were evaluated at the last follow-up. In addition, plain radiographs were reviewed to evaluate joint congruency, fracture union, heterotopic ossification, and the development of arthritic changes. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean arcs of flexion-extension and supination-pronation values were 118.2° and 146.8° in the fixation group and 122.5° and 151.3° in the non-fixation group, respectively. The mean MEPSs were 96.4 in the fixation group (excellent, nine cases; good, tow cases) and 96.7 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, two cases). The mean modified Broberg-Morrey scores were 94.0 in the fixation group (excellent, sevev cases; good, four cases) and 94.0 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, tow cases). No statistically significant differences in clinical scores and ROM were identified between the two groups. However, the non-fixation group showed a significantly lower height loss of the coronoid process than the fixation group (36.3% versus 54.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the fixation and non-fixation groups in terrible triad injuries.

A novel fragment specific classification of complex olecranon fractures: 3-dimensional model design, radiological validation, and proposed surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications for proximal ulna fracture patterns rely on qualitative data and cannot inform surgical planning. We propose a new classification system based on a biological and anatomical stress analysis. Our hypothesis is that fragment types in complex fractures can be predicted by the tendon and ligament attachments on the proximal ulna. METHODS: First, we completed a literature review to identify quantitative data on proximal ulna soft tissue attachments. On this basis, we created a 3-dimensional model of ulnar anatomy with SliceOMatic and Catia V5R20 software and determined likely locations for fragments and fracture lines. The second part of the study was a retrospective radiological study. A level-1 trauma radiological database was used to identify computed tomography scans of multifragmentary olecranon fractures from 2009 to 2021. These were reviewed and classified according to the "fragment specific" classification and compared to the Mayo and the Schatzker classifications. RESULTS: Twelve articles (134 elbows) met the inclusion criteria and 7 potential fracture fragments were identified. The radiological study included 67 preoperative computed tomography scans (mean 55 years). The fragments identified were the following: posterior (40%), intermediate (42%), tricipital (100%), supinator crest (25%), coronoid (18%), sublime tubercle (12%), and anteromedial facet (18%). Eighteen cases (27%) were classified as Schatzker D (comminutive) and 21 (31%) Mayo 2B (stable comminutive). Inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.71 among 3 observers. CONCLUSION: This proposed classification system is anatomically based and considers the deforming forces from ligaments and tendons. Having a more comprehensive understanding of complex proximal ulna fractures would lead to more accurate fracture evaluation and surgical planning.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Surgical treatment and outcomes of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations of the elbow are complex injuries that can be difficult to classify and treat. Trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries, in which the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the metaphysis, present substantial challenges to achieve anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2019, 32 consecutive trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction and internal fixation at our institution. Four elbows were lost to follow-up within the first 6 months after surgery and were excluded. Among the 28 elbows remaining, there were 13 females and 15 males with a mean age of 56 (range 28-78) years at the time of injury. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up times were 37 months and 29 months, respectively. Radiographs were reviewed to determine rates of union, Hastings and Graham heterotopic ossification (HO) grade, and Broberg and Morrey arthritis grade. RESULTS: Union occurred in 25 elbows. Union could not be determined for 1 elbow at most recent follow-up and the remaining 2 elbows developed nonunion of the coronoid. Complications occurred in 10 elbows (36%): deep infection (4), ulnar neuropathy (2), elbow contracture (2), and nonunion (2). There were reoperations in 11 elbows (39%): irrigation and débridement with hardware removal (4), hardware removal (2), ulnar nerve transposition (2), contracture release with HO removal (2), and revision with iliac crest autograft (1). At most recent follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 106° (range 10°-150°), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 137° (range 0°-170°). The mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range 0-39) points with a mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation-Elbow score of 81 (range 55-100) points. At final radiographic follow-up, 16 elbows (57%) had HO (8 class I and 8 class II), and 20 elbows (71%) had arthritis (8 grade 1, 6 grade 2, and 6 grade 3). DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations are severe injuries associated with high rates of reoperation, HO, and post-traumatic arthritis. However, the majority of elbows achieve union, a functional range of motion, and reasonable patient reported outcome measures. Over the study period, surgeons were more likely to utilize multiple deep approaches and separate fixation of the coronoid (either with lag screws or anteromedial plates) to ensure anatomic reduction.

Considerable variation in current coronoid height and fracture measurement techniques: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Coronoid fractures usually occur in the presence of a significant osseoligamentous injury to the elbow. Fracture size and location correlate with degree of instability and many authors have attempted to analyze the effect of fracture variation on decision making and outcome. There remains no standardized technique for measuring coronoid height or fracture size. The aim of this study was to appraise the literature regarding techniques for coronoid height measurement in order to understand variation. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A search was performed to identify studies with either a description of coronoid height, fracture size, or bone loss using the terms (Coronoid) AND (Measurement) OR (Size) OR (Height). Articles were shortlisted by screening for topic relevance based on title, abstract and, if required, full-text review. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles, those on nonhuman species or parts other than the ulna coronoid process, and studies that included patients with pre-existing elbow pathology. Shortlisted articles were grouped based on study type, imaging modality, measurement technique, and measurement parameter as well as its location along the coronoid. RESULTS: Thirty out of the initially identified 494 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one articles were clinical studies, 8 were cadaveric studies, and 1 combined patients as well as cadavers. A variety of imaging modalities (plain radiographs, 2-dimensional computed tomography [CT], 3-dimensional CT, magnetic resonance imaging or a combination of these) were used with CT scan (either 2-dimensional images or 3-dimensional reconstructions or both) being the most common modality used by 21 studies. Measurement technique also varied from uniplanar linear measurements in 15 studies to multiplanar area and volumetric measurements in 6 studies to techniques describing various angles and indices as an indirect measure of coronoid height in 8 studies. Across the 30 shortlisted studies, 19 different measurement techniques were identified. Fifteen studies measured normal coronoid height while the other 15 measured intact coronoid and/or fracture fragment height. The location of this measurement was also variable between studies with measurements at the apex of the coronoid in 24/30 (80%) of studies. Measurement accuracy was assessed by only 1 study. A total of 12/30 (40%) studies reported on the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of their measurement technique. CONCLUSION: The systemic review demonstrated considerable variability between studies that report coronoid height or fracture size measurements. This variability makes comparison of coronoid height or fracture measurements and recommendations based on these between studies unreliable. There is need for development of a consistent, easy to use, and reproducible technique for coronoid height and bone loss.

Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems.

BACKGROUND: Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II. RESULTS: The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13. DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

Physeal Closure and Fracture Pattern in Adolescent Transitional Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: To show a correlation between grade of physeal closure and fracture pattern in adolescent transitional distal radius fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 490 distal radius fractures, ages 14 to 18, at a single institution between 2007 and 2020. A board-certified orthopaedic hand surgeon reviewed all images. Thirty-six distal-radius fractures were considered adolescent transitional fractures. The review included Salter-Harris classification, fracture fragments, and grade of physeal closure. RESULTS: Distal radial physeal closure is 50 times more likely to be of a higher grade in the presence of Salter-Harris type IV fractures ( P <0.001). Closure of the physis is also 7.37 and 13.08 times more likely to be of higher grade in the absence of a dorsal metaphyseal fracture and in the presence of an ulnar corner fracture, respectively ( P =0.011 and 0.021). CONCLUSION: Adolescent transitional fractures of the distal radius occur when the growth plate has a partial closure. The closure pattern of the distal radial physis begins centrally, with subsequent ulnar and then radial closure. In this cohort, there is a correlation between grade of physeal closure and fracture pattern in adolescent transitional distal radius fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-diagnostic.

Refracture Following Operative Treatment of Pediatric Both Bone Forearm Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Both bone forearm fractures are common injuries in children. Most can be treated with reduction and casting. Those that fail nonoperative management can be treated with a plate or intramedullary fixation; however, refracture remains a problem. The goal of this study is to evaluate the refracture rate in both bone forearm fractures based on the mode of fixation. METHODS: Institutional board review approval was obtained. A retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2021 at a single tertiary care institution was conducted for all operative patients <18 years who sustained a both bone forearm fracture. Groups were stratified based on initial operative fixation type: both bones fixated using nails, 1 bone fixated with a nail; both bones plated, and 1 bone plated. Further review was conducted to identify refractures following initial operative treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the χ 2 test of independence and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In all, 402 operatively treated both bone forearm fracture patients were identified. Two hundred fifty-six of these patients underwent intramedullary fixation (average age 10.3y/o), while 146 patients received plate fixation (average age 13.8y/o). Fracture location was similar across the nailing and plating cohorts, most often occurring in the mid-shaft region. Patients aged ≤10 years refractured at a significantly higher rate than patients aged >10 years across all operative fixation cohorts (12.5% vs. 2.5%, P <0.001). Among the 256 patients who underwent intramedullary fixation, 61.3% had both bones treated (n=157/256), whereas 38.7% received single bone fixation (n=99/256). Of the 146 plate fixations, 84.4% had both bones fixed (n=123/146), and only 15.8% were treated with single bone fixation (n=23/146). In the intramedullary group, 15 patients sustained refractures, 11 of whom were treated with single bone fixation (11.1%, n=11/99) versus 4 with both both fixation (2.5%, n=4/157). Among the plating group, 7 patients sustained refractures, 6 with both bone fixation (4.9%, n=6/123) and 1 in single bone fixation (4.3%, n=1/23). Refractures were found to be significantly more prevalent among patients treated with single bone compared with both bone intramedullary nail fixation (11.1% vs. 2.5%, P =0.006). By fixated bone, single bone ulna fixations had a higher refracture rate compared with both bone fixations (12.1% vs. 3.6%, P =0.003). CONCLUSION: The overall refracture rate following operative treatment of both bone fractures is 5.5% and is similar between intramedullary and plate fixations. Overall, patients ≤10 years of age had a higher rate of refracture. Among single bone fixations, higher refracture was seen with intramedullary fixations, and when the radius was treated nonoperatively. Surgeons may be able to reduce the refracture rate by performing intramedullary fixation of both bones instead of only one bone. Effective postoperative counseling among younger patients may also decrease refracture rates.

Physeal Fractures of the Distal Ulna: Incidence and Risk Factors for Premature Growth Arrest.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of distal ulnar growth arrest following physeal fracture and to identify specific risk factors for premature physeal closure. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a distal ulnar physeal fracture was performed at a single United States children's hospital. Patients without 6-month follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted. Fractures were classified by the Salter-Harris (SH) system. All follow-up radiographs were reviewed for changes in ulnar variance or signs of premature physeal arrest. RESULTS: Fifty-six children with distal ulnar physeal fracture at a mean age of 10.7±3.3 years were included with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. The most common fracture pattern was a SH II (52.7%), versus SH I (29.1%), SH III (9.1%), and SH IV (9.1%). Of displaced fractures (41.1%), the mean translation was 40.2±38.3% the and mean angulation was 24.8±20.9 degrees. Eleven fractures (19.6%) demonstrated radiographic signs of growth disturbance, including 3 patients (5.4%) with growth disturbance but continued longitudinal growth and 8 patients (14.3%) with complete growth arrest. The average ulnar variance was -3.4 mm. Three patients underwent subsequent surgical reconstruction including ulnar lengthening with an external fixator, distal ulna completion epiphysiodesis with distal radius epiphysiodesis, and ulnar corrective osteotomy. Patients with displaced fractures and SH III/IV fractures were more likely to develop a growth disturbance (34.8% vs. 3.2%, P =0.003; 50.0% vs. 11.1%, P =0.012, respectively). Children with less than 2 years of skeletal growth remaining at the time of injury had a higher risk of growth disturbance (46.2% vs. 9.5%, P =0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SH III and IV fractures are more common injury patterns in the distal ulna compared with the distal radius. Growth disturbance or growth arrest occurs in ~20% of distal ulnar physeal fractures. Displaced fractures, intra-articular fractures, fractures requiring open reduction, and older children are at increased risk of distal ulnar growth arrest and should be followed more closely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV--case series.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Varus Posteromedial Rotational Instability of the Elbow Joint in Children: Re-Understanding of the Injury Mechanism Associated With Coronoid Process Fractures.

PURPOSE: To investigate the injury mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of varus-posteromedial rotational instability of the elbow joint in children. METHODS: According to the diagnostic criteria of varus posteromedial rotational instability of elbow joint, 16 children with coronoid process fractures treated in our department from July 2013 to July 2017 were re-evaluated. There were 14 males and 2 females, aged 7 to 14 years, with an average age of 11.6 years. Eight cases on left and 8 cases on right side. An associated elbow dislocation occurred in 8 of 16 cases. Nine patients were treated with a lateral soft tissue repair only. In 7 other patients in addition to the lateral soft tissue repair, the coronoid process fractures were treated with open reduction and fixation. At the last clinical follow-up, each elbow joint range of motion was recorded, radiographs were obtained, and functional performance was evaluated by the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 81.9 months for the 9 patients treated with lateral elbow soft tissue repair. At the last follow-up, 2 of the patients had MEPS scores as excellent, 1 was good, and 6 were rated as moderate or poor. Four patients had a cubitus varus deformity. The average follow-up time was 30.3 months for the 7 patients treated with both soft tissue repair and coronoid fracture stabilization. The elbow joint MEPS scores for each of these 7 patients was excellent at the last follow-up, and no complications such as cubitus varus occurred. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that children could also develop elbow varus-posterior medial rotational instability injuries under the same mechanism. Although the morbidity rate is low, due to insufficient understanding of the injury mechanism, it is prone to missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and delayed treatment, resulting in severe complications such as elbow instability, dislocation, traumatic arthritis, and elbow stiffness. On the contrary, according to the treatment principle of the posterior medial rotational instability of the elbow joint in adult, while the lateral repair is carried out, strong and effective reduction and fixation of the coronoid process fractures are adopted, it is expected that such children with rare elbow injuries can obtain excellent treatment outcomes.

Pediatric Type I Open Both Bone Forearm Fractures: Predicting Failure of Nonoperative Management.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, nonoperative treatment of pediatric type I open both bone forearm fractures (OBBFFs) with bedside irrigation, antibiotics, closed reduction, and casting has yielded low infection rates. However, risk factors for failure of type I OBBFF closed reduction have not been well described. Our purpose was to describe management of patients with type I OBBFFs at our institution and determine what factors are associated with failure of closed reduction in this population. METHODS: This was a review of patients between 5 and 15 years of age who received initial nonoperative management for type I OBBFFs at one institution between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome was success or failure of nonoperative management (defined as progression to surgical management). Secondary outcomes included infections, compartment syndromes, and neuropraxias. Other variables of interest were demographic information, prereduction and postreduction translation and angulation of the radius and ulna, cast index, and antibiotic administration. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (67.7% male) with 62 type I OBBFFs were included in this study. Following initial nonoperative management, 55 injuries (88.7%) were successfully treated in casts, while the remaining 7 (11.3%) required surgical intervention following loss of acceptable reduction in cast. Median cast index (0.84, IQR 0.8 to 0.9 vs. 0.75, IQR 0.7-0.8, P =0.020) and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (32.0%, IQR 17.0% to 40.0% vs. 5.0%, IQR 0.0% to 26.0%, P =0.020) were higher among those who failed nonoperative management. Multivariable logistic regression models identified increased odds of failure for every SD (0.7) increase in cast index (OR 3.78, P =0.023, 95% CI: 1.4-14.3) and 25% increase in postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior films (OR 7.39, P =0.044, 95% CI 1.2-70.4). No infections or compartment syndromes and 2 transient ulnar neuropraxias occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction of type I OBBFFs was successful in 88.7% of cases. There were no infections after nonoperative management. Increases in cast index of 0.7 and postreduction radius translation on anteroposterior radiographs of 25% were associated with increased likelihood of failure, thus requiring surgery; age was not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective comparative study.

Haematoma block is the most efficient technique for closed forearm fracture reduction: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. This study aimed to compare the resource utilisation of three anaesthetic techniques used for closed forearm fracture reduction in the ED: haematoma block (HB), Bier's block (BB) and procedural sedation (PS). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted of adult patients presenting to either Port Macquarie Base Hospital ED or Kempsey District Hospital ED in New South Wales, Australia, from January 2018 to June 2021. Patients requiring a closed reduction in the ED were included. ED length of stay (LOS) was compared using a likelihood ratio test. Successful reduction on the first attempt and the number of ED specialists present for each method were both modelled with a linear regression. Staff utilisation by the level of training, cost of consumables and complications for each group were presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 226 forearm fractures were included. 84 used HB, 35 BB and 107 PS. The mean ED LOS was lowest for HB (187.7 min) compared with BB (227.2 min) and PS (239.3 min) (p=0.023). The number of ED specialists required for PS was higher when compared with HB and BB (p=0.001). The cost of consumables and a total number of staff were considerably lower for HB compared with PS and BB methods. PS had the highest proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt (94.4%) compared with BB (88.6%) and HB (76.2%) (p=0.006). More patients experienced complications from PS (17.8%) compared with BB (14.3%) and HB (13.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the HB method was the most efficient as it was associated with a shorter ED LOS, lower cost and staff resource utilisation. Although PS had a significantly greater proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt, HB had fewer complications than BB and PS. EDs with limited resources should consider using HB or BB as the initial technique for fracture reduction with PS used for failed HB or when regional blocks are contraindicated.