The effect of valacyclovir on secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection, following primary maternal infection acquired periconceptionally or in the first trimester of pregnancy. An individual patient data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that a dosage of 8 g/d of oral valacyclovir reduces substantially the vertical transmission rate of cytomegalovirus in women with primary cytomegalovirus infection acquired periconceptionally or during the first trimester of pregnancy. This individual patient data meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of valacyclovir treatment in the secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the US registry of clinical trials (www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov), and gray literature sources were searched from inception to March 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized studies administering 8 g/d of oral valacyclovir in pregnant women with primary cytomegalovirus infection acquired periconceptionally or during the first trimester of pregnancy were included. METHODS: All corresponding authors of the eligible studies were contacted. Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tools were used for the risk of bias assessment. The result of amniocentesis was the primary outcome of interest. A 1-stage individual patient data meta-analysis was performed, using a generalized linear mixed model, clustered by the different trials. A subgroup analysis was performed, assessing separately the effect of valacyclovir in the periconceptional period and first trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS: Overall, 3 studies were included in the analysis (n=527 women). Valacyclovir reduced the vertical transmission rate of cytomegalovirus (adjusted odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.61). This reduction was apparent for both periconceptional period (adjusted odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.96) and first-trimester (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.76) infections. Moreover, valacyclovir reduced the rate of neonatal infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.47), in both periconceptional period (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.61) and first-trimester (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.54) infections. Furthermore, valacyclovir reduced the rate of termination of pregnancy because of cytomegalovirus-associated severe fetal findings (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.24). The gestational age at the initiation of treatment has a positive correlation with all outcomes. The overall prevalence of severe side effects was 2.1%. CONCLUSION: A dosage of 8 g/d of oral valacyclovir reduced the vertical transmission rates of cytomegalovirus following primary maternal infection acquired periconceptionally or in the first trimester of pregnancy, with a low incidence of side effects.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.

Medication Associations With Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: A Case/Non-Case Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) are potentially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Although the classical causal agents of SCARs (antibiotics, anticonvulsants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and allopurinol) are well characterized, there has been little update to this list to account for newly marketed medications. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated and stratified list of medications with significant reporting odds ratios (RORs) of SCARs. METHODS: A case/non-case analysis using the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was performed. RESULTS: As expected, the prototypical medication classes made up the majority of reported cases of SJS, TEN, AGEP, and DRESS (77%, 64%, 75%, and 72%, respectively). In addition, several infrequently or previously undescribed classes/medications implicated in SCARs were identified to have significant ROR signals, including acetylcysteine, anticoagulants, diuretics, immunotherapies, proton pump inhibitors, antivirals, and antifungals. Among these reported for SJS were acetylcysteine (ROR: 64.38) and fluconazole (ROR: 17.13). For TEN, we identified furosemide (ROR: 26.32), spironolactone (ROR: 14.45), fluconazole (ROR: 30.21), amphotericin B (39.06), and acetylcysteine (ROR: 93.12). For AGEP, we identified acyclovir (ROR: 61.72), valacyclovir (ROR: 30.76), and enoxaparin (ROR: 27.37). For DRESS, we identified vemurafenib (ROR: 17.35), acyclovir (ROR: 30.63), abacavir (ROR: 26.62), raltegravir (ROR: 23.27), and valacyclovir (ROR: 21.77) to have strong reporting odds. CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides an updated tool for physicians to reference when identifying suspected SCARs and a basis for future studies to investigate atypical medication causality.

Characteristics of Prescreened Patients Who Did Not Participate in the Zoster Eye Disease Study.

PURPOSE: The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the National Eye Institute aiming to determine the efficacy of suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) that enrolled fewer participants than planned (527/780, 67.6%). Understanding reasons for nonparticipation of likely eligible prescreened patients provides insights into patient populations that are not represented by ZEDS and barriers in clinical trials. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, HZO adults likely eligible for ZEDS with a history of a typical rash and a medical record within the past year of an episode of epithelial or stromal keratitis or iritis were prescreened at activated Participating Clinical Centers from 2017 to 2022 using a standard prescreening log. De-identified data including demographic information, reasons for exclusion because of ineligibility, and patient refusal were retrospectively entered into REDCap and analyzed. RESULTS: Prescreening logs with reasons for nonconsent (1244/1706, 72.9%) were included in the data set. Patients were excluded from the study (915/1244, 73.6%) because they did not meet all inclusion criteria (619/915, 67.7%) or met an exclusion criterion (296/915, 32.3%). Among the 12 exclusion criteria for the ZEDS study, immunocompromise (76/296, 25.7%) and renal insufficiency (50/296, 16.9%) were most frequently reported. Patient refusal to participate (327/1,244, 26.3%) was common. CONCLUSION: The most common reasons for ineligibility were immunocompromise and renal insufficiency. There may be benefits to long-term antiviral use in these populations not captured in ZEDS. A quarter (26.3%) of prescreened patients refused participation, showing the substantial impact of patient preferences on trial participation.

Clinical features of atypical presentations of mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection observed in immunosuppressed individuals. Part II: the knife-cut sign.

The knife-cut sign is a distinctive manifestation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 or HSV type 2 infection that has been described in at least 10 immunocompromised patients. It appears as an extremely painful linear erosion or fissure in an intertriginous area such as the body folds beneath the breast, or within the abdomen, or in the inguinal region. Also, concurrent HSV infection at other mucocutaneous sites, or viscera, or both have been observed. The patients had medical conditions (at least 9 patients) and/or immunosuppressive drug therapy (6 patients). The diagnosis of HSV infection was confirmed by viral culture (8 patients), biopsy (4 patients), direct fluorescence antibody testing (3 patients), immunohistochemistry staining (2 patients), polymerase chain reaction (2 patients), or Western blot serologic assay (1 patient). Knife-cut sign-associated HSV infection is potentially fatal; three patients died. However, clinical improvement or complete healing occurred in the patients who received oral valacyclovir (1 patient), or intravenous acyclovir (2 patients), or intravenous acyclovir followed by foscarnet (1 patient). In summary, HSV infection associated with a positive the knife-cut sign is a potentially fatal variant of HSV infection that occurs in the intertriginous areas of immunocompromised patients and usually requires intravenous antiviral therapy.

Clinical features of atypical presentations of mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection observed in immunosuppressed individuals. Part I: herpetic geometric glossitis.

Herpetic geometric glossitis is a unique morphologic variant of HSV (herpes simplex virus) type 1 infection on the dorsum of the tongue that presents as an extremely painful linear central lingual fissure with a branched pattern. in the center of the tongue; there is a branched pattern of fissures that extend bilaterally from the central linear fissure. Herpetic geometric glossitis has been reported in 11 patients; 8 of these individuals were immunocompromised. Medical conditions and immunosuppressive medication treatment (7 patients) or only medical disorders (3 patients) or neither (1 patient) were present. HSV type 1 infection was diagnosed by viral culture in (7 patients), Tzanck preparation (2 patients) or clinically (2 patients). Mucocutaneous HSV infection at non-lingual locations--including the lips, labial mucosa, face and chest--were observed in 5 patients. All patients' symptoms and lesions responded to treatment with oral antiviral therapy: acyclovir (9 patients), famciclovir (1 patient) or valacyclovir (1 patient). The lingual pain and dorsal tongue fissures completely resolved completely within two to 14 days. In summary, herpetic geometric glossitis is a unique HSV type 1 infection, usually in immunocompromised patients, that occurs on the dorsal tongue and responds completely after treatment with orally administered antiviral therapy.

[Clinical features of acyclovir encephalopathy without acute kidney injury].

INTRODUCTION: Few reports have described acyclovir (ACV) encephalopathy without acute kidney injury (AKI). OBJECTIVE: This study clarified the clinical features of ACV encephalopathy without AKI compared to that with AKI. METHODS: Creatinine (Cre) levels were measured on admission. After admission, Cre was measured in a timely manner for the first seven hospital days. The minimum Cre level in these measurements was then determined. ACV encephalopathy was defined when two criteria were met: 1) neurological symptoms appeared after valacyclovir (VACV) administration, and 2) neurological symptoms improved after VACV discontinuation. AKI was defined when the Cre level on admission was >1.5 times higher than the minimum Cre level. The subjects were divided into AKI and non-AKI groups based on these findings. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had ACV encephalopathy (5 males, mean age 81.3±5.5 years old). All patients were prescribed VACV 3,000 mg/day. The minimum Cre was 1.93±1.76 mg/dL. AKI occurred in 10 (56.6%) patients. VACV was discontinued in all patients, and emergency hemodialysis treatment was administered in 10 (55.6%) patients. All patients recovered. Compared to the AKI group, the non-AKI group had a lower history of taking a Ca-blocker (33.3% vs 80.0%, p=0.092), a lower rate of emergency dialysis (16.9% vs 70.0%, p=0.059) and a longer time to clinical improvement (3.67±1.86 vs 2.20±0.63 days, p=0.073). CONCLUSION: ACV encephalopathy without AKI is characterized by a low rate of emergency dialysis, which may be linked to a prolonged duration of symptoms.

THE COMBINATION OF ORAL VALACYCLOVIR WITH TOPICAL CLOBETASOL THERAPY WAS THE MOST EFFECTIVE IN REDUCING THE TIME TO HEAL FROM HERPES LABIALIS.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Koe KH, Veettil SK, Maharajan MK, Syeed MS, Nair AB, Gopinath D. comparative efficacy of antiviral agents for prevention and management of herpes labialis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2023 Mar; 23(1):101778. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101778. Epub 2022 Sep 14. PMID: 36914303. SOURCE OF FUNDING: None. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

THE EFFECT OF MELATONIN ON THE SERUM LEVEL OF INTERLEUKIN 31 IN HERPESVIRUS SKIN DISEASES ON THE BACKGROUND OF HIV.

The immune system of the skin is the first line of defense against various infections, on the other hand, its strategic location as a key barrier between external and internal environment makes the skin an important tool for maintaining homeostasis, so dermatological lesions are often a manifestation of various pathological conditions. Thus, herpesvirus skin diseases, which are the result of reactivation of a latent infection and occur against the background of human immunodeficiency, may be the first manifestation of HIV. Active study of melatonin in recent years in the dermatological field is associated with interest in its biological action, which extends to the skin due to the melatoninergic system, and promising prospects for the development of new treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of melatonin on the serum levels of interleukin 31 in herpesvirus skin diseases on the background of HIV. The current study selected 40 HIV patients who had an acute herpesvirus infection caused by HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, EBV, and HHV-8 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, valaciclovir in standard therapeutic doses and melatonin as immunomodulatory therapy. Patients in the melatonin group received two melatonin tablet, 3 mg for 14 days, 6 mg daily (two doses of 3 mg). Group II included patients who received antiretroviral therapy in combination with valaciclovir. Serum levels of IL-31 were measured before and after 14 days of therapeutic intervention. The mean serum level of IL-31 was significantly lower in the melatonin group (p˂0.05). Also, in both groups, serum levels of IL-31 showed a significant increase compared to the indicator of the norm. The results of this study showed that melatonin administration could modify inflammatory cytokines secretion such as IL-31. Given the low toxicity of melatonin and its ability to reduce side effects and increase the efficiency of therapeutic agents, its use may be important and significant in combined therapy in combination with highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Revised Protocol for Secondary Prevention of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection With Valaciclovir Following Infection in Early Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: A previous randomized placebo-controlled study found valaciclovir to be effective in reducing the rate of vertical cytomegalovirus transmission from mother to fetus. The better results in women infected in the first trimester compared to the periconception period were attributed to the timing of treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate valaciclovir efficacy in this setting using a revised protocol. METHODS: All pregnant women treated with valaciclovir in 2020-2022 who met the same criteria as in the original study were identified retrospectively from the database of the same medical center. Treatment, however, was initiated earlier: up to 9 weeks or 8 weeks from the presumed time of infection in women infected in the periconception period or the first trimester, respectively. The primary endpoint was rate of vertical cytomegalovirus transmission. Results were compared with the placebo arm in the previous study. RESULTS: Among 178 women who completed valaciclovir treatment, amniocentesis was positive for cytomegalovirus in 14 women (7.9%), significantly (P < .001) lower compared with 14 of 47 (30%) in the placebo arm in the previous study. The proportion of positive amniocentesis in the valaciclovir was significantly lower than the placebo arm both among women infected in the first trimester (14/119 vs 11/23; odds ratio [OR] = 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .05-.45, P < .001), as well as among those infected in the periconception period (0/59 vs 3/24, OR = 0; 95% CI 0-.97, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence of the efficacy of valaciclovir in preventing vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus after primary maternal infection. Efficacy is improved with earlier treatment.

The cost-effectiveness of maternal and neonatal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Japan.

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is the most common congenital infection. Using a decision tree model, cost-effectiveness of maternal screening with subsequent prenatal valacyclovir treatment and newborn screening with neonatal valganciclovir treatment was evaluated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for (1) universal maternal antibody screening with prenatal valacyclovir treatment compared to targeted newborn screening, and (2) universal newborn screening with postnatal valganciclovir treatment compared to targeted newborn screening. We performed a one-way sensitivity analysis. Compared to targeted newborn screening, the ICERs for universal newborn screening and maternal screening were 2 966 296 Japanese Yen (JPY) (21 188 USD) and 1 026 984 JPY (7336 USD), respectively. In all scenarios in the one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICERs of the maternal screening and the universal newborn screening strategies were less than three gross domestic product per capita compared with the targeted newborn screening strategy. Both maternal and universal newborn screening strategies may be cost-effective than a targeted newborn screening program. The potential utility of the maternal screening with valacyclovir treatment strategy, while potentially cost effective in regions with lower baseline seroprevalence rates, requires further study as the modeling was based on limited evidence.

Antiviral treatment in schizophrenia: a randomized pilot PET study on the effects of valaciclovir on neuroinflammation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia experience cognitive impairment, which could be related to neuroinflammation in the hippocampus. The cause for such hippocampal inflammation is still unknown, but it has been suggested that herpes virus infection is involved. This study therefore aimed to determine whether add-on treatment of schizophrenic patients with the anti- viral drug valaciclovir would reduce hippocampal neuroinflammation and consequently improve cognitive symptoms. METHODS: We performed a double-blind monocenter study in 24 male and female patients with schizophrenia, experiencing active psychotic symptoms. Patients were orally treated with the anti-viral drug valaciclovir for seven consecutive days (8 g/day). Neuroinflammation was measured with Positron Emission Tomography using the translocator protein ligand [11C]-PK11195, pre-treatment and at seven days post-treatment, as were psychotic symptoms and cognition. RESULTS: Valaciclovir treatment resulted in reduced TSPO binding (39%) in the hippocampus, as well as in the brainstem, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, parietal lobe, occipital lobe, insula and cingulate gyri, nucleus accumbens and thalamus (31-40%) when using binding potential (BPND) as an outcome. With total distribution volume (VT) as outcome we found essentially the same results, but associations only approached statistical significance (p = 0.050 for hippocampus). Placebo treatment did not affect neuroinflammation. No effects of valaciclovir on psychotic symptoms or cognitive functioning were found. CONCLUSION: We found a decreased TSPO binding following antiviral treatment, which could suggest a viral underpinning of neuroinflammation in psychotic patients. Whether this reduced neuroinflammation by treatment with valaciclovir has clinical implications and is specific for schizophrenia warrants further research.

Effective CMV prophylaxis with high-dose valaciclovir in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell recipients at a high risk of CMV infection.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Universal antiviral prophylaxis with letermovir is effective but unsubsidized in Australia. Valaciclovir demonstrates anti-CMV activity in high doses, but few current real-world studies explore its use as primary prophylaxis in high-risk patients post-alloHSCT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of alloHSCT recipients at high risk of clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi), defined as a plasma CMV DNA viral load of >400 IU/ml requiring preemptive therapy, or CMV disease. High-risk recipients were CMV seropositive and underwent T-cell depleted, haploidentical or umbilical cord stem-cell transplants. Consecutive patients transplanted from July 2018 to January 2020, treated with valaciclovir 2 g TDS from day +7 to +100 (HD-VALA), were compared to a historical cohort (July 2017-June 2018) who only received preemptive CMV therapy, and standard valaciclovir (SD-VALA) for varicella/herpes prophylaxis. We compared incidence of and time to cs-CMVi. RESULTS: In the SD-VALA cohort (n = 27, median CMV follow-up duration 259 days), 23/27 (85%) developed cs-CMVi at a median of 39 days. For the HD-VALA cohort (n = 35, median CMV follow-up duration 216 days), 19/35 (54%) developed cs-CMVi, at a median of 68 days. Time to cs-CMVi was significantly longer in HD-VALA cohort (p < .0001). On multivariate analysis, HD VALA reduced the risk of cs-CMVi (HR 0.32, p = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: In alloHSCT recipients at high risk for cs-CMVi, HD-VALA resulted in lower cumulative reactivation, and delayed reactivation, reducing requirement for preemptive CMV therapy in the early post-engraftment period.

Effectiveness and safety of prenatal valacyclovir for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Universal screening for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in pregnancy is not recommended in most countries. One of the major deterrents is the lack of effective prenatal therapy. The role of valacyclovir therapy in reducing the risk of vertical transmission, symptomatic congenital CMV infection and adverse outcome is controversial. The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of prenatal valacyclovir therapy in pregnancies with maternal CMV infection. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. The inclusion criteria were pregnancy with confirmed maternal CMV infection, treated or untreated with valacyclovir. The primary outcome was the incidence of congenital CMV infection confirmed by a positive CMV polymerase chain reaction result of the amniotic fluid. The secondary outcomes were symptomatic and asymptomatic infection, perinatal death, termination of pregnancy, anomalies detected on follow-up ultrasound, on fetal magnetic resonance imaging or at birth, severe and mild-to-moderate symptoms due to congenital CMV infection, neurological, visual and hearing symptoms, and adverse events related to valacyclovir. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) or Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, as appropriate. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare the risk of each of the explored outcomes according to whether pregnancies with maternal CMV infection were treated with prenatal valacyclovir therapy. RESULTS: Eight studies (620 women) were included. Pregnancies treated with valacyclovir had a significantly lower risk of congenital CMV infection compared with those not receiving valacyclovir (three studies; 325 fetuses; pooled odds ratio (OR), 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.64); I2 = 0%; P < 0.001). When stratifying the analysis according to gestational age at maternal infection, the risk of vertical transmission was significantly lower in pregnancies receiving valacyclovir following first-trimester maternal infection (three studies; 184 fetuses; pooled OR, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.15-0.74); I2 = 20.9%; P = 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the two groups in those acquiring CMV infection in the periconceptional period or in the third trimester of pregnancy. Only one study reported on the risk of vertical transmission in women infected in the second trimester, demonstrating a lower risk of congenital infection in women taking valacyclovir, although this was based on a small number of cases. Pregnancies treated with valacyclovir therapy had an increased likelihood of asymptomatic congenital CMV infection compared with those not receiving valacyclovir (two studies; 132 fetuses; pooled OR, 2.98 (95% CI, 1.18-7.55); I2 = 0%; P = 0.021), while there was no significant difference between the two groups in the risk of perinatal death (P = 0.923), termination of pregnancy (P = 0.089), anomalies detected at follow-up imaging assessment during pregnancy or at birth (P = 0.934) and symptoms due to CMV infection in the newborn (P = 0.092). The occurrence of all adverse events in pregnant individuals taking valacyclovir was 3.17% (95% CI, 1.24-5.93%) (six studies; 210 women), with 1.71% (95% CI, 0.41-3.39%) experiencing acute renal failure, which resolved after discontinuation of the drug. On GRADE assessment, the quality of evidence showing that valacyclovir reduced the risk of congenital CMV infection and adverse perinatal outcome was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal valacyclovir administration in pregnancies with maternal CMV infection reduces the risk of congenital CMV infection. Further evidence is needed to elucidate whether valacyclovir can affect the course of infection in the fetus and the risk of symptomatic fetal or neonatal infection. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Cost-effectiveness of screening and valacyclovir-based treatment strategies for first-trimester cytomegalovirus primary infection in pregnant women in France.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness of four screening strategies for first-trimester (T1) cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary infection (PI) in pregnant women in France. METHODS: In a simulated pregnant population of 800 000 (approximate number of pregnancies each year in France), using costs based on the year 2022, we compared four CMV maternal screening strategies: Strategy S1, no systematic screening (current public health recommendations in France); Strategy S2, screening of 25-50% of the pregnant population (current screening practice in France); Strategy S3, universal screening (current medical recommendations in France); Strategy S4, universal screening (as in Strategy S3) in conjunction with valacyclovir in case of T1 PI. Outcomes were total cost, effectiveness (number of congenital infections, number of diagnosed infections) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Two ICERs were calculated, comparing Strategies S1, S2 and S3 in terms of euros (€) per additional diagnosis, and comparing Strategies S1 and S4 in € per avoided congenital infection. RESULTS: Compared with Strategy S1, Strategy S3 enabled diagnosis of 536 more infected fetuses and Strategy S4 prevented 375 congenital infections. Strategy S1 was the least expensive strategy (€98.3m total lifetime cost), followed by Strategy S4 (€98.6m), Strategy S2 (€106.0m) and Strategy S3 (€118.9m). In the first analysis, Strategy S2 was dominated and Strategy S3 led to an additional €38 552 per additional in-utero diagnosis, compared with Strategy S1. In the second analysis, Strategy S4 led to an additional €893 per avoided congenital infection compared with Strategy S1, and was cost-saving compared with Strategy S2. CONCLUSIONS: In France, current screening practice for CMV PI during pregnancy is no longer acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness because this strategy was dominated by universal screening. Moreover, universal screening in conjunction with valacyclovir treatment would be cost-effective compared with current recommendations and is cost-saving compared with current practice. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

New data on efficacy of valacyclovir in secondary prevention of maternal-fetal transmission of cytomegalovirus.

OBJECTIVE: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the leading cause of non-genetic hearing and neurological deficits. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir (VCV) treatment in preventing CMV transmission to the fetus after maternal primary infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study evaluating the rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission in pregnancies with maternal primary CMV infection treated with VCV at a dosage of 8 g per day (VCV group) compared with a control group of untreated women. Each case underwent virological testing to confirm maternal primary infection and to provide accurate dating of onset of infection. The primary outcome was the presence of congenital CMV infection at birth diagnosed based on polymerase chain reaction analysis of saliva, urine and/or blood samples. The efficacy of VCV treatment was assessed using logistic regression analysis adjusted for a propensity score. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 59 were in the VCV group and 84 were in the untreated control group. On propensity-score-adjusted analysis, VCV treatment was significantly associated with an overall reduction in the rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission (odds ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.90); P = 0.029). The rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission, determined at birth, in the VCV vs control group was 7% (1/14) vs 10% (1/10) after periconceptional maternal primary infection (P = 1.00), 22% (8/36) vs 41% (19/46) after first-trimester maternal primary infection (P = 0.068) and 25% (2/8) vs 52% (14/27) after second-trimester maternal primary infection (P = 0.244). When analyzing the efficacy of VCV treatment according to maternal viremia at treatment initiation, there was a trend towards greater efficacy when patients were viremia-positive (21% vs 43%; P = 0.072) compared with when they were viremia-negative (22% vs 17%; P = 0.659). Maternal side effects associated with VCV were mild and non-specific in most cases. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that VCV treatment of pregnant women with primary CMV infection reduces the risk of maternal-fetal transmission of CMV and may be effective in cases with primary infection in the first and second trimesters. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

High dose valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common and clinically significant viral infections following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Currently available options for CMV prophylaxis and treatment present challenges related to side effects and cost. METHODS: In this retrospective medical record review, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or reactivation requiring preemptive treatment) following allogeneic HCT was compared in patients receiving valacyclovir 1 g three times daily versus acyclovir 400 mg every 12 h for viral prophylaxis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients who received valacyclovir were matched based on propensity scoring to 35 patients who received acyclovir. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing anti-thymocyte globulin. Clinically significant CMV infection by day + 180 was lower in the valacyclovir group compared to the acyclovir group (18% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). Patients receiving valacyclovir prophylaxis also had less severe infection evidenced by a reduction in CMV disease, lower peak CMV titers, delayed CMV reactivation, and less secondary neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Prospective evaluation of valacyclovir 1 g three times daily for viral prophylaxis following allogeneic HCT is warranted. Due to valacyclovir's favorable toxicity profile and affordable cost, it has the potential to benefit patients on a broad scale as an option for CMV prophylaxis.

Bell Palsy: Rapid Evidence Review.

Bell palsy should be suspected in patients with acute onset of unilateral facial weakness or paralysis involving the forehead in the absence of other neurologic abnormalities. The overall prognosis is good. More than two-thirds of patients with typical Bell palsy have a complete spontaneous recovery. For children and pregnant women, the rate of complete recovery is up to 90%. Bell palsy is idiopathic. Laboratory testing and imaging are not required for diagnosis. When other causes of facial weakness are being considered, laboratory testing may identify a treatable cause. An oral corticosteroid regimen (prednisone, 50 to 60 mg per day for five days followed by a five-day taper) is the first-line treatment for Bell palsy. Combination therapy with an oral corticosteroid and antiviral may reduce rates of synkinesis (misdirected regrowth of facial nerve fibers manifesting as involuntary co-contraction of certain facial muscles). Recommended antivirals include valacyclovir (1 g three times per day for seven days) or acyclovir (400 mg five times per day for 10 days). Treatment with antivirals alone is ineffective and not recommended. Physical therapy may be beneficial in patients with more severe paralysis.

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF ANTIVIRAL AGENTS FOR PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF HERPES LABIALIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative efficacy and safety of antiviral agents used in the prevention and management of herpes labialis through a network meta-analysis of clinical trials. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Ovid Medline PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting a comparison of antiviral agents in the management and prevention of herpes labialis in healthy/immunocompetent adults. The data extracted from the selected RCTs were assessed and a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. The interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). RESULTS: A total of 52 articles were included for qualitative synthesis and for the quantitative part, 26 articles were analyzed for the primary treatment outcome and 7 studies were analyzed for the primary prevention outcome. The combination therapy of oral valacyclovir and topical clobetasol was the best ranked with a mean reduction in healing time of -3.50 (95% CI -5.22 to -1.78) followed by vidarabine monophosphate of -3.22 (95% CI -4.59 to -1.85). No significant inconsistencies, heterogeneity, and publication bias were reported for TTH outcome analysis. For primary prevention outcomes, only 7 RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and none of the interventions was shown to be superior to each other. The absence of adverse events was reported by 16 studies, whereas other studies reported mild side effects only. CONCLUSION: NMA highlighted that several agents were effective in the management of herpes labialis among which the combination of oral valacyclovir with topical clobetasol therapy was the most effective in reducing the time to heal. However, further studies are required to determine which intervention is the most effective in preventing the recurrence of herpes labialis.

[What is known about the diagnosis and treatment of herpes labialis?] / Wat is er bekend over de diagnostiek en behandeling van herpes labialis?

Herpes labialis is one of the most common skin infections. In most people it is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, but very severe cases do occur. Herpes remains latent and can recur. Herpes labialis is a clinical diagnosis. If in doubt, additional testing can be carried out, usually polymerase chain reaction. There are no treatments that can eliminate the virus. In case of more severe symptoms and frequent recurrences, there may be an indication for treatment. In case of mild complaints, topical zinc sulphate/zinc oxide and analgesics (systemic or topical lidocaine) will suffice. More severe complaints and frequent recurrences can be treated with antiviral creams (Aciclovir) or with systemic antiviral medication (Valaciclovir). In frequent recurrences, prophylactic Valaciclovir can also be given for a period of many months. Treatment should be started as soon as possible and will slightly shorten the duration of the disease.