ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To provide a narrative review of hospital violence (HV) and its impact on critical care clinicians. DATA SOURCES: Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing HV, risk factors, precipitating events, consequences, and mitigation strategies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that specifically addressed HV involving critical care medicine clinicians or their practice settings were selected. The time frame was limited to the last 15 years to enhance relevance to current practice. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and abstracted data were parsed by setting, clinician type, location, social media events, impact, outcomes, and responses (agency, facility, health system, individual). DATA SYNTHESIS: HV is globally prevalent, especially in complex care environments, and correlates with a variety of factors including ICU stay duration, conflict, and has recently expanded to out-of-hospital occurrences; online violence as well as stalking is increasingly prevalent. An overlap with violent extremism and terrorism that impacts healthcare facilities and clinicians is similarly relevant. A number of approaches can reduce HV occurrence including, most notably, conflict management training, communication initiatives, and visitor flow and access management practices. Rescue training for HV occurrences seems prudent. CONCLUSIONS: HV is a global problem that impacts clinicians and imperils patient care. Specific initiatives to reduce HV drivers include individual training and system-wide adaptations. Future methods to identify potential perpetrators may leverage machine learning/augmented intelligence approaches.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Humans , Critical Care/methods , Intensive Care Units , Risk Factors , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency, risk factors, consequences, and prevention of violence against healthcare workers in intensive care units. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies on violence against healthcare workers in adult intensive care units. Risk factors, patient characteristics, and implications for healthcare workers were collected. Study quality, bias, and level of evidence were assessed using established tools. RESULTS: Seventy-five studies with 139,533 healthcare workers from 32 countries were included. The overall median frequency of violence was 51% (IQR 37-75%). Up to 97% of healthcare workers experienced verbal violence, and up to 82% were victims of physical violence. Meta-analysis of frequency revealed an average frequency of 31% (95% CI 22-41%) for physical violence, 57% for verbal violence (95% CI 48-66%), and 12% for sexual violence (95% CI 4-23%). Heterogeneity was high according to the I2 statistics. Patients were the most common perpetrators (median 56%), followed by visitors (median 22%). Twenty-two studies reported increased risk ratios of up to 2.3 or odds ratios of up to 22.9 for healthcare workers in the ICU compared to other healthcare workers. Risk factors for experiencing violence included young age, less work experience, and being a nurse. Patients who exhibited violent behavior were often male, older, and physically impaired by drugs. Violence was underreported in up to 80% of cases and associated with higher burnout rates, increased anxiety, and higher turnover intentions. Overall the level of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace violence is frequent and underreported in intensive care units, with potential serious consequences for healthcare workers, calling for heightened awareness, screening, and preventive measures. The potential risk factors for violence should be further investigated. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was registered with Prospero on January 15, 2023 (ID CRD42023388449).
Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Intensive Care Units , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/psychologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Healthcare workers experience a disproportionate frequency of workplace violence. Identifying commonalities among incidents of workplace violence provides an opportunity for change to prevent and mitigate future violence. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite a continued decline in overall workplace violence, the rate of violence in the healthcare sector is steadily rising. While healthcare workers make up 13% of the workforce, they experience 60% of all workplace assaults. Environmental, structural, and staffing issues may all contribute to the increased rates of workplace violence affecting healthcare workers. SUMMARY: Comprehensive proactive workplace violence prevention programs can significantly reduce the frequency of violence and the negative impact on employees and institutions. Analyzing the factors that contribute to violence in the healthcare workplace provides the potential to mitigate these risks and reduce episodes of violence.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Workplace Violence , Workplace , Humans , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Female , Occupational HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aggression and violence by patient (and their relatives/friends) is widely acknowledged as a serious occupational hazard, with physicians being particularly susceptible to witnessing and experiencing such incidents within hospitals. Research has shown that the negative consequences of such aggression and violence are not only felt at the individual level, but also at the team and organizational levels. Understanding how to prevent and manage this behavior towards physicians in hospitals is urgent and not fully researched. While there are many potentially effective interventions, it is unclear which ones would be valuable and feasible for Chinese hospitals. Because patient aggression and violence may occur more frequently in Chinese hospitals than in other countries, this suggests that cultural differences play a role and that tailored interventions may be needed. METHOD: We conducted a Delphi study to reach a consensus on the importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals. Seventeen experts in China were invited to complete online questionnaires over three rounds. RESULTS: After three rounds, consensus was achieved concerning 44 interventions, five other interventions were rejected, and no consensus was reached on another two. These interventions were clustered into eight categories: environment design, access and entrance, staffing and working practices, leadership and culture, training and education, support, during/after-the-event actions, and hospital policy. Each category is considered important in preventing and managing patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence towards physicians in Chinese hospitals. This study also investigated the feasibility of the suggested interventions and found that 36 of the 44 interventions were considered not only relevant, but also feasible for implementation in Chinese hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of interventions that can be implemented in Chinese hospitals to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence before, during, and after a violent incident occurs.
Subject(s)
Aggression , Delphi Technique , Feasibility Studies , Physicians , Humans , China , Physicians/psychology , Male , Female , Hospitals , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Violence/prevention & control , Middle Aged , LeadershipABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Violence in the healthcare workplace has been a global concern for over two decades, with a high prevalence of violence towards healthcare workers reported. Workplace violence has become a healthcare quality indicator and embedded in quality improvement initiatives of many healthcare organizations. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Canada's largest mental health hospital, provides all clinical staff with mandated staff safety training for self-protection and team-control skills. These skills are to be used as a last resort when a patient is at imminent risk of harm to self or others. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two training methods of this mandated staff safety training for workplace violence in a large psychiatric hospital setting. METHODS: Using a pragmatic randomized control trial design, this study compares two approaches to teaching safety skills CAMH's training-as-usual (TAU) using the 3D approach (description, demonstration and doing) and behavioural skills training (BST), from the field of applied behaviour analysis, using instruction, modeling, practice and feedback loop. Staff were assessed on three outcome measures (competency, mastery and confidence), across three time points: before training (baseline), immediately after training (post-training) and one month later (follow-up). This study was registered with the ISRCTN registry on 06/09/2023 (ISRCTN18133140). RESULTS: With a sample size of 99 new staff, results indicate that BST was significantly better than TAU in improving observed performance of self-protection and team-control skills. Both methods were associated with improved skills and confidence. However, there was a decrease in skill performance levels at the one-month follow-up for both methods, with BST remaining higher than TAU scores across all three time points. The impact of training improved staff confidence in both training methods and remained high across all three time points. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that BST is more effective than TAU in improving safety skills among healthcare workers. However, the retention of skills over time remains a concern, and therefore a single training session without on-the-job-feedback or booster sessions based on objective assessments of skill may not be sufficient. Further research is needed to confirm and expand upon these findings in different settings.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Canada , Clinical Competence , Health Personnel/education , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Inservice Training , Mental Health Services , Workplace Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The alarming rise in workplace violence against healthcare workers, particularly nurses, is concerning. Addressing this complex issue requires a systematic, technology-driven approach. The AWARE Framework offers nurse leaders an actionable strategy to create a safer care environment by integrating advanced digital solutions.
Subject(s)
Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Health Personnel , WorkplaceABSTRACT
AIM: This integrative review explored violence against emergency nurses by patients/visitors, examining its nature, contributing factors and consequences. DESIGN: Integrative review. DATA SOURCES: Articles were obtained from PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases, up until December 2021. REVIEW METHODS: 26 articles were reviewed, evaluating study quality with the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool and synthesizing conclusions through theme development and coding. RESULTS: This review delves into the issue of violence perpetrated against emergency nurses by patients and visitors. It elucidates three overarching themes: the nature of violence, the contributing factors and the consequences of such acts. CONCLUSION: The findings inform healthcare policy for the development of prevention approaches while identifying research gaps and emphasizing the need for alternative study designs and methodologies. IMPACT: This review has implications for nursing practice, policymaking and research, emphasizing the need for stakeholder engagement and tailored interventions for at-risk emergency nurses. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project was an integrative review of the literature therefore no patient or public contribution was necessary. WHAT ALREADY IS KNOWN: Violence by patients and visitors in healthcare settings, especially in emergency departments, has garnered considerable attention. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: This review specifically examines violence-targeting emergency department nurses from patients and visitors, assessing its characteristics, contributing factors and consequences. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE/POLICY: The findings will guide stakeholder engagement in developing interventions to support vulnerable emergency nurses.
Subject(s)
Violence , Workplace Violence , Humans , Patients , Emergency Service, Hospital , Visitors to Patients , Policy Making , Workplace Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate nurse confidence in coping with patient aggression after implementing a workplace violence prevention program that includes management and postevent support. BACKGROUND: Patient aggression toward nurses is increasing, leading many healthcare organizations to develop workplace violence prevention programs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a large healthcare system in the Midwestern United States. Clinical nurses caring for adult patients across the care continuum ≥51% of the time were invited to participate. RESULTS: In situ simulation plus standard training did not have a significant impact on confidence after controlling for the year education occurred; however, nurses completing training in 2022 had significantly higher confidence than nurses completing training in 2019. Use of the Violence Assessment Tool and participating in a post-control alert debriefing were also associated with significantly higher confidence. CONCLUSION: Factors other than education may influence nurses' confidence in coping with patient aggression.
Subject(s)
Nurses , Workplace Violence , Adult , Humans , Aggression , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Coping Skills , WorkplaceABSTRACT
AIM: Work-related violence is a significant problem in healthcare settings and emergency departments are one of the highest at-risk locations. There have been significant challenges in identifying successful risk-mitigation strategies to reduce the incidence and impact of work-related violence in this setting. This research explores the perspectives of clinical staff who routinely use violence risk assessment to provide recommendations for improvements. DESIGN: This qualitative research used interviews of staff who routinely use of the Bröset Violence Checklist in an emergency department. The study was conducted in April 2022. METHOD: Interview transcripts were subjected to Thematic Analysis to explore participants' clinical experiences and judgements about the utility of the Bröset Violence Checklist. RESULTS: Eleven staff participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants described themes about the benefits of routine violence risk assessment and the influence of the subjective opinion of the scorer with respect to the emergency department patient cohort. Four categories of violence risk factors were identified: historical, clinical, behavioural and situational. Situational risks were considered important for tailoring the tool for context-specificity. Limitations of the BVC were identified, with recommendations for context-specific indicators. CONCLUSION: Routine violence risk assessment using the Bröset Violence Checklist was deemed useful for emergency departments, however, it has limitations. IMPACT: This study's findings offer potential solutions to reduce violence affecting front-line workers and practical processes that organizations can apply to increase staff safety. IMPLICATIONS: The findings produced recommendations for future research and development to enhance utility of the Bröset Violence Checklist. REPORTING METHOD: EQUATOR guidelines were adhered to and COREQ was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was involved in this study.
Subject(s)
Checklist , Workplace Violence , Humans , Checklist/methods , Violence/prevention & control , Aggression , Patients , Emergency Service, Hospital , Workplace Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
AIM: To explore general nurses' experiences of modifying and implementing contextually suitable Safewards interventions into medical and surgical hospital wards. DESIGN: Qualitative action research was used working with nurses as co-researchers. METHODS: Pre-implementation focus groups were conducted in April 2022 to understand and explore the current strategies nurses utilized to avert, respond to or decrease violence. Following this, two Safewards interventions were modified by the nurses on the wards. Post-implementation focus groups were conducted in October 2022, to explore the nurses' experience of implementing Safewards interventions and the effect on their nursing practice. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the analysis of the pre-implementation focus groups that reflected the type of violence experienced by these nurses and the context within which they occurred: 'the space is hectic'; 'it can feel like a battlefield'; and 'the aftermath'. These themes encompass the nurses' experience of violence from patients and their visitors. Following the implementation of two modified Safewards interventions, the analysis of the focus groups reflected a change in nursing skills to avert or respond to violence: 'Safewards in action'; 'empathy and self-reflection'; and 'moving forward'. CONCLUSION: Safewards interventions can be successfully modified and used in general hospital wards and influence nursing practice to manage patient and visitor violence. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: In the interests of safety, successful interventions to reduce violence towards general hospital nurses should be a priority for managers and healthcare organizations. Averting, mitigating and managing violence can decrease the negative professional and personal effect on nurses and ultimately improve well-being, job satisfaction and retention rates. Furthermore, decreasing violence or aggressive incidents leads to a safer patient experience and decreased number of nursing errors ultimately improving patient experiences and outcomes. Understanding nurses' experiences of violence and working with them to explore and develop contextually relevant solutions increases their capacity to respond to and avert violent incidents. Contextually modified Safewards interventions offer one such solution and potentially has wider implications for healthcare settings beyond the specific wards studied. IMPACT: This study addressed the implementation of modified Safewards strategies in medical and surgical wards to prevent violence. Three themes emerged from the analysis of the pre-implementation focus groups that reflected the type of violence experienced by these nurses and the context within which they occurred. Following the implementation of two modified Safewards interventions, the post-implementation focus groups reported positive changes to their practices using the modified resources to prevent violence from patients and their visitors. Mental health interventions, such as those used in the Safewards model can be modified and provide a tool kit of interventions that can be used by medical and surgical nurses. REPORTING METHOD: This paper has adhered to the COREQ guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: This paper outlines and discusses the action research approach undertaken to work with general hospital nurses to modify mental health nurses' Safewards interventions into their clinical practice. This paper provides evidence of the 'real world' application of Safewards interventions by medical and surgical nurses in general hospital wards. This paper presents qualitative findings based on focus group methods to highlight the narratives of general nurses and their experiences of violence.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Qualitative Research , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Adult , Female , Male , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare is a growing challenge posing significant risks to patient care and employee well-being. Existing metrics to measure WPV in healthcare settings often fail to provide decision-makers with an adequate reflection of WPV due to the complexity of the issue. This increases the difficulty for decision-makers to evaluate WPV in healthcare settings and implement interventions that can produce sustained improvements. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and compile a list of quality indicators that have previously been utilized to measure WPV in healthcare settings. The identified quality indicators serve as tools, providing leadership with the necessary information on the state of WPV within their organization or the impact of WPV prevention interventions. This information provides leadership with a foundation for planning and decision making related to addressing WPV. METHODS: Ovid databases were used to identify articles relevant to violence in healthcare settings, from which 43 publications were included for data extraction. Data extraction produced a total of 229 quality indicators that were sorted into three indicator categories using the Donabedian model: structure, process, and outcome. RESULTS: A majority of the articles (93%) contained at least 1 quality indicator that possessed the potential to be operationalized at an organizational level. In addition, several articles (40%) contained valuable questionnaires or survey instruments for measuring WPV. In total, the rapid review process identified 84 structural quality indicators, 121 process quality indicators, 24 outcome quality indicators, 57 survey-type questions and 17 survey instruments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a foundation for healthcare organizations to address WPV through systematic approaches informed by quality indicators. The utilization of indicators showed promise for characterizing WPV and measuring the efficacy of interventions. Caution must be exercised to ensure indicators are not discriminatory and are suited to specific organizational needs. While the findings of this review are promising, further investigation is needed to rigorously evaluate existing literature to expand the list of quality indicators for WPV.
Subject(s)
Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Facilities , Surveys and Questionnaires , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized pediatric patients with behavioral health (BH) diagnoses awaiting transfer can exhibit behaviors that may lead to workplace violence such as aggression. Workplace violence can lead to discomfort in caring for these patients. Huddles can be used as a tool to identify potential for violence, to help address workplace violence, and improve clinician situational awareness. METHODS: Utilizing QI methodology, a BH specific huddle tool was created and implemented on an Acute Care floor that identified key components such as triggers and behavioral stability. Mixed methods were used to study the intervention including focus groups, surveys and measurement of agreement (surrogate for situational awareness). The aims of this quality improvement (QI) project were to 1) improve situational awareness by increasing agreement between team members 2) improve the overall comfort of the clinical team caring for BH patients by 10%. RESULTS: Agreement between clinicians on patient stability increased by 20%. Comfort in caring for BH patients increased by 4%. Providers reported the tool increased their understanding (89%) and communication (81%) regarding plan of care. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Standardized huddle tool can be utilized to increase situational awareness among team members caring for patients with behavioral health diagnoses and may help to address workplace violence.
Subject(s)
Quality Improvement , Humans , Child , Female , Male , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/psychology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Focus GroupsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To prevent workplace violence (WV) against visiting nurses (VNs), understanding the influencing factors is crucial. To better comprehend potential violence prevention strategies, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has presented the four-level social-ecological model (SEM) at the 1) individual, 2) relationship, 3) community, and 4) societal levels. This study aims to quantify WV studies against VNs, examine the influencing factors, identify gaps based on SEM levels, and propose future research and policy directions. DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted following the five-stage protocol proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005. METHODS: Systematic searches, including manual searches, were performed using English and Korean databases. Published journal articles including editorials on WV against VNs were included, irrespective of the publication date. FINDINGS: Sixty journal articles were finally selected. Until the 1990s, most of the literature comprised editorials, with empirical research emerging after the 2000s. Classifying studies by SEM level, many studies have focused on individual (86.7%) and community (66.7%) factors, but fewer have addressed relationship (21.7%) and societal (16.7%) factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that much research has focused on individual-centered training, with gaps in risk assessment tool development, training incorporating relational aspects, standardized protocols, and understanding of the impact of legal rights and policies. This article advocates a comprehensive approach that considers all SEM levels to address WV against VNs. CLINICAL EVIDENCE: The findings confirm a research gap, which suggests the direction for future research and policies. Stakeholders should be urged to implement evidence-based strategies that contribute to safer work environments for VNs.
Subject(s)
Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Nurses, Community HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric nurses are at a higher risk for exposure to violence and aggression, leading to potential burnout, moral injury, post-traumatic stress, and turnover. There is little evidence of a preferred strategy to support nurses and decrease the impact of traumatic experiences on psychiatric nurses. The aim of this integrative review was to explore potential strategies to decrease the impact of traumatic experiences among nurses in psychiatric settings. METHODS: Following a systematic search of PsycINFO/Ovid, CINAHL, and MEDLINE/Pubmed, Joanna Briggs Institute quality appraisal tools were used to analyze quality of the articles. Thirteen articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for this study. Data were analyzed and synthesized into three key themes and seven sub-themes. RESULTS: Three themes were noted to be common to the included texts. 1. Interpersonal Supports (Formal Support, Peer/Supervisor Support, and Informal Family/Social Support). 2. Organizational Supports (Perception of Job Safety/Satisfaction, Promoting Personal Resilience, Supporting Team Resilience, and Organizational Commitment to Resilience). 3. Protection of Personal Resources. CONCLUSIONS: Many common suggestions for decreasing the impact of exposure to violence and trauma were noted across the thirteen articles, however, there is little evidence of a preferred strategy, how strategies are developed and employed or the efficacy of any particular strategy. Further investigation is needed to identify and evaluate supportive interventions, their feasibility and efficacy.
Subject(s)
Psychiatric Nursing , Humans , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Social Support , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Workplace Violence/psychology , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Workplace violence is a pervasive, perpetual, and underreported problem in the emergency department. Nurses experience devastating physical and psychological consequences owing to workplace violence exposure. Understanding workplace violence is challenging due to nurse underreporting. Improvement in capturing workplace violence cases can help drive data-informed, sustainable solutions to workplace violence prevention. The purpose of this project was to better capture the full extent of workplace violence in the emergency department through enhanced nurse workplace violence reporting. METHODS: In collaboration with emergency nurses and management, the project team used a multi-interventional approach and designed a feasible electronic reporting instrument to capture workplace violence events in real time by reducing nurse reporting barriers. Participating nurses accessed the instrument by scanning a quick-response code with their mobile phones. This code was strategically located on wall flyers and individual name badge stickers. Data were collected using Qualtrics software and analyzed using SPSS Statistics, which summarized the descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Two months after implementation, the electronic reporting instrument recorded 94 quick response code scans and 59 workplace violence reports, resulting in a 1080% increase in ED workplace violence reporting compared with the 2 months prior to implementation. The 59 workplace violence reports comprised 78% registered nurses, 19% emergency medical technicians, and 3% other health care workers. Workplace violence events were most frequent from 12:01 pm to 6:00 pm in treatment rooms (37%), triage (29%), waiting room (19%), behavioral health section (15%), and hallway (12%). DISCUSSION: A multi-interventional approach, coupled with a feasible, readily available electronic reporting instrument, enhanced ED workplace violence reporting and facilitated a better capture of ED workplace violence. Although nurse underreporting is still likely occurring, an emergence of workplace violence data trends can provide data-driven solutions in workplace violence prevention. Continued efforts to reduce the barriers that inhibit reporting are needed to foster a safe and supportive culture surrounding workplace violence reporting.
Subject(s)
Emergency Nursing , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Quality Improvement , Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Nursing/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , MaleABSTRACT
Workplace violence (WPV) has become a crisis for health care workers, with a significant increase in violent events taking place in health care settings across the nation. Health care organizations should develop a comprehensive WPV program that includes recognition, management, and reporting of all types of WPV. A large health care system developed strategies and a program to address WPV. The health care system believes that a safe and respectful work environment is foundational to the goal of zero preventable harm. The "Safety in the Workplace" initiative was designed to raise awareness of concerning behaviors and to offer tools and resources for identifying, responding to, and reporting incidents of violence, aggression, or disruptive behaviors of WPV. During a 6-month pilot of a WPV bundle, there was a 44% reduction in physical violence reports and a 44% reduction in reported incidents of WPV. From June 2020 to June 2021, there was a 10% decrease in WPV overall.
Subject(s)
Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/psychology , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Empowerment , Workplace/psychology , Workplace/standardsABSTRACT
The current study assessed the effects of workplace violence (WPV) and fear related to WPV on community mental health (CMH) workers' emotional distress. This cross-sectional study used structural equation modeling (SEM) and comprised participants who were CMH workers in Korea. We used WPV questionnaires and the Korean version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® item bank to evaluate emotional distress. SEM data from 763 workers revealed significant positive effects of WPV on anxiety (ß = 0.23, p = 0.009) and anger (ß = 0.26, p = 0.007), and significant positive effects of fear related to WPV on anxiety (ß = 0.21, p = 0.004) and anger (ß = 0.19, p = 0.002). Preventive measures significantly mediated the relationship between WPV and emotional distress and between fear related to WPV and emotional distress. Findings verified the relationship between WPV and workers' emotional distress and the mediating role of preventive measures. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(4), 24-32.].
Subject(s)
Psychological Distress , Workplace Violence , Humans , Workplace Violence/prevention & control , Workplace Violence/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anxiety , WorkplaceABSTRACT
Violence against physicians is not a newly emerged but an increasingly serious problem. Various studies have reported a prevalence of up to 90%. If not prevented, it not only causes physical and mental harm to physicians who are dedicated to serving humanity but also affects the entire healthcare system and, consequently, the whole community with its direct and indirect effects. Some interventions have a positive outcome when effectively managed. However, for these interventions to be permanent and effective, they need to be multidisciplinary, legally backed and adopted as public policy. In this article, the prevalence of violence against physicians in the literature, its causes, practices worldwide, and suggestions for solving this problem are compiled.
Subject(s)
Physicians , Humans , Physicians/psychology , Workplace Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Preventive policies have been devised with the aim of curbing health-related violence, and their efficacy is believed to furnish evidence for their continued implementation, thereby enhancing their effectiveness. This study undertakes a retrospective analysis of these policies in the context of Türkiye. A comprehensive examination involved the review of 26 documents, employing a progressive scanning approach for data collection. This methodology encompassed the utilization of gray literature databases (OECD iLibrary and WHO Iris), extensive Google searches, thorough website scans, and consultations with subject-matter experts. Data analysis was meticulously conducted within the framework of the Health Policy Triangle. The findings reveal active participation from diverse stakeholders, including governmental bodies, political entities, professional organizations, and trade unions, in various preventive initiatives aimed at mitigating health-related violence. Notably, the adoption of legislation for health violence prevention, perceived as a paramount achievement, can be attributed to persistent efforts by both the media and other influential actors and stakeholders. These endeavors have sustained the topic's prominence on the policy agenda, positioning it as a promising source for the development of novel violence prevention and management strategies. This study underscores the necessity for a comprehensive investigation into the working conditions, personal rights, and wage policies of healthcare workers, in light of documented factors that frequently precipitate violence. Concomitantly, it advocates for the development of effective mechanisms to address these issues.
Subject(s)
Policy Making , Workplace Violence , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Turkey , Delivery of Health Care , Workplace Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While customer interactions are inherent and essential aspects of the service industry, instances of violence against service workers have brought social attention to the need for a system to ensure their protection. In South Korea, a protection system for the health of service workers has been implemented to prevent this type of violence and its negative consequences. This study conducted a comparative analysis to clarify the impacts of this protection system across a sample of service workers. We collected data on their general characteristics, occupational characteristics, and experiences with the service protection system to determine how those factors were related to workplace violence, with a focus on whether the system has reduced such occurrences. METHODS: We collected self-reported survey data over 28 days (March 2 to March 30, 2020), resulting in 1,349 (99.3%) responses for our final analysis. We conducted a chi-square test and logistic regression analysis to investigate the general and occupational characteristics, experiences of violence, and experiences with the worker protection system. RESULTS: We found workplace violence is more observed among males, older workers, electronic equipment repairers, irregular workers, and those who worked for extended periods. On the other hand, we found a reduction in the occurrence of workplace violence in businesses that provided service workers with regular counseling from professional counselors, had designated persons responsible for grievance procedures, and/or had grievance procedure committees. We found the lowest likelihood of workplace violence in businesses that operated stress relaxation programs (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a correlation between the adoption of the protection system for service workers and the prevalence of workplace violence. We also clarified the effects of the service protection system and developed a plan for its expansion. KEY POINTS: This study clarified the correlation between the adoption of the protection system for service workers and the occurrence of workplace violence. Along with our investigation of the protection system's effects, these findings provide a basis for expanding Korea's existing worker protection system.