Centrally Guided Identification of Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: Lessons From Trauma Systems.

OBJECTIVE: Improve prehospital identification of acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) by using a trauma system-based emergency communication center (ECC) to guide the emergency medical service (EMS). METHODS: We trained 24 ECC paramedics in the Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment (EMSA). ECC-guided EMS in performance of the EMSA on patients with suspected stroke. During the second half of the study, we provided focused feedback to ECC after reviewing recorded ECC-EMS interactions. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval of ECC-guided EMSA to the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for predicting a discharge diagnosis of LVO. RESULTS: We enrolled 569 patients from September 2016 through February 2018. Of 463 patients analyzed, 236 (51%) had a discharge diagnosis of stroke and 227 (49%) had a nonstroke diagnosis. There were 45 (19%) stroke patients with LVO. For predicting LVO, there was no significant difference between the EMSA AUC = .68 (.59-.77) and the NIHSS AUC = .73 (.65-.81). An EMSA score greater than or equal to 4 had sensitivity = 75.6 (60.5-87.1) and specificity = 62.4 (57.6-67.1) for LVO. During the first 9 months of the study, the EMSA AUC = .61 (.44-.77) compared to an AUC = .74 (.64-.84) during the second 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: ECC-guided prehospital EMSA is feasible, has similar ability to predict LVO compared to the NIHSS, and has sustained performance over time.

Assessing the clinical utilization of tranexamic acid by paramedics for patients with major trauma (ACUTE).

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the clinical utilization of tranexamic acid (TXA) by paramedics in British Columbia (BC) for acute major trauma and to quantify the percentage of patients who received TXA among those who met the indications for administration. METHODS: A quality assurance review of eligible trauma patients across the province was performed using a convenience sample. Trauma patients between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017 with suspected or actual hemorrhage were selected if they met inclusion criteria (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg ± heart rate > 120 beats per minute) and exclusion criteria (age < 16 years, injuries exclusively to the extremities). RESULTS: 35 of the 100 eligible patients assessed in this review received a dose of TXA from paramedics. All 35 of the patients received TXA within 180 min of injury regardless of their original location of injury in BC (mean: 50 min; range: 15-140 min). CONCLUSIONS: 35% of eligible patients identified in this study received TXA, which is an improvement over rates cited by previous Canadian literature. With further education opportunities for paramedics in BC and other EMS systems, there is potential to continue improving pre-hospital TXA administration rates.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Cette étude visait à caractériser l'utilisation clinique de l'acide tranexamique (TXA) par les ambulanciers paramédicaux de la Colombie-Britannique pour les traumatismes aigus majeurs et à quantifier le pourcentage de patients qui ont reçu du TXA parmi ceux qui répondaient aux indications d'administration. MéTHODES: Un examen de l'assurance qualité des patients traumatisés admissibles dans toute la province a été effectué à l'aide d'un échantillon de commodité. Les patients traumatisés entre le 1er avril 2016 et le 31 mars 2017 présentant une hémorragie suspectée ou réelle ont été sélectionnés s'ils répondaient aux critères d'inclusion (pression artérielle systolique < 90 mm Hg ± fréquence cardiaque > 120 battements par minute) et aux critères d'exclusion (âge < 16 ans, blessures exclusivement aux extrémités). RéSULTATS: 35 des 100 patients admissibles évalués dans le cadre de cet examen ont reçu une dose de TXA des ambulanciers paramédicaux. Les 35 patients ont tous reçu du TXA dans les 180 min suivant la blessure, quel que soit le lieu de leur blessure initiale en Colombie-Britannique (moyenne: 50 min; intervalle: 15 à 140 min). CONCLUSIONS: 35% des patients admissibles identifiés dans le cadre de cette étude ont reçu du TXA, ce qui représente une amélioration par rapport aux taux cités dans les publications canadiennes précédentes. Grâce aux possibilités de formation continue pour les ambulanciers en Colombie-Britannique et dans d'autres systèmes d'Aide médicale urgente (AMU), il est possible de continuer à améliorer les taux d'administration de la TXA en milieu préhospitalier.

Decrease in emergency medical services utilization during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia.

OBJECTIVE: To date in the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a decrease in patients accessing emergency health services, (EHS) but research has been conducted in areas with a very high incidence of COVID-19. In an area with a low COVID-19 incidence, we estimate changes in EHS use. METHODS: We compared EHS encounters in British Columbia from March 15 (the date of school and business closures) to May 15, 2020, when compared to the same period in 2019. We categorized EHS encounters into 18 presenting complaints and prespecified critical care complaints including major trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We analyzed by descriptive methods. RESULTS: Comparing 2019 to 2020, total EHS encounters decreased from 83,925 (incidence rate 834 per 100,000 person-months) to 71,611 (incidence rate 701 per 100,000 person-months) for a decrease of 133 per 100,000 person-months (95% CI 126-141). The top 18 codes had a significant decrease in every category except respiratory and anxiety. Encounters for critically ill patients decreased significantly overall from 3019 to 2753 (incidence rate difference 3.1 per 100,000 person-months, 95% CI 1.6-4.5), including stroke, trauma, and STEMI, but the incidence of OHCA appeared stable. CONCLUSION: In a single province with a low incidence of COVID-19, there was a 15% reduction in overall EHS use and a 9% reduction in critical illness. EHS planners will need to match patient need with available resources.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Jusqu'à présent dans la pandémie de Covid-19, il y a eu une diminution du nombre de patients ayant accès aux services de santé d'urgence, mais des recherches ont été menées dans des zones à très forte incidence de Covid-19. Dans une zone à faible incidence de Covid-19, nous estimons les changements dans l'utilisation des services de santé d'urgence. MéTHODES: Nous avons comparé les cas des services de santé d'urgence en Colombie-Britannique du 15 mars (date de fermeture des écoles et des entreprises) au 15 mai 2020, par rapport à la même période en 2019. Nous avons classé les cas des services de santé d'urgence en 18 plaintes de présentation et des plaintes de soins intensifs pré-spécifiées, y compris un traumatisme majeur, un arrêt cardiaque, un accident vasculaire cérébral et un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST. Nous avons analysé par des méthodes descriptives. RéSULTATS : En comparant 2019 à 2020, le nombre total des cas des services de santé d'urgence est passé de 83 925 (taux d'incidence de 834 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) à 71 611 (taux d'incidence de 701 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) pour une diminution de 133 pour 100 000 personnes-mois (IC à 95 % 126 à 141). Les 18 codes principaux ont connu une diminution significative dans toutes les catégories, sauf respiratoire et anxiété. Les cas chez les patients gravement malades ont globalement diminué de manière significative de 3 019 à 2 753 (différence de taux d'incidence de 3,1 pour 100 000 personnes-mois, IC à 95 % de 1,6 à 4,5), y compris les accidents vasculaires cérébraux, les traumatismes et les STEMI, mais l'incidence des arrêts cardiaque hors hôpital semble stable. CONCLUSIONS: Dans une seule province avec une faible incidence de Covid-19, il y a eu une réduction de 15 % de l'utilisation globale des services de santé d'urgence et une réduction de 9 % des maladies graves. Les organisateurs des services de santé d'urgence devront faire correspondre les besoins des patients avec les ressources disponibles.

Are paramedic students ready to be professional? An international comparison study.

INTRODUCTION: The last decade has seen rapid advancement in Australasian paramedic education, clinical practice, and research. Coupled with the movements towards national registration in Australia and New Zealand, these advancements contribute to the paramedic discipline gaining recognition as a health profession. AIM: The aim of this paper was to explore paramedic students' views on paramedic professionalism in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Using a convenience sample of paramedic students from Whitireia New Zealand, Charles Sturt University and Monash University, attitudes towards paramedic professionalism were measured using the Professionalism at Work Questionnaire. The 77 item questionnaire uses a combination of binary and unipolar Likert scales (1 = Strongly disagree/5 = Strongly agree; Never = 1/Always = 5). RESULTS: There were 479 students who participated in the study from Charles Sturt University n = 272 (56.8%), Monash University n = 145 (30.3%) and Whitireia New Zealand n = 62 (12.9%). A number of items produced statistically significant differences P < 0.05 between universities, year levels and course type. These included: 'Allow my liking or dislike for patients to affect the way I approach them' and 'Discuss a bad job with family or friends outside work as a way of coping'. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that paramedic students are strong advocates of paramedic professionalism and support the need for regulation. Data also suggest that the next generation of paramedics can be the agents of change for the paramedic discipline as it attempts to achieve full professional status.

Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: an examination of stroke center identification options: multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification Options of the American Stroke Association.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The American Stroke Association (ASA) assembled a multidisciplinary group of experts to develop recommendations regarding the potential effectiveness of establishing an identification program for stroke centers and systems. "Identification" refers to the full spectrum of models for assessing and recognizing standards of quality care (self-assessment, verification, certification, and accreditation). A primary consideration is whether stroke center identification might improve patient outcomes. METHODS: In February 2001, ASA, with the support of the Stroke Council's Executive Committee, decided to embark on an evaluation of the potential impact of stroke center identification. HealthPolicy R&D was selected to prepare a comprehensive report. The investigators reported on models outside the area of stroke, ongoing initiatives within the stroke community (such as Operation Stroke), and state and federal activities designed to improve care for stroke patients. The investigators also conducted interviews with thought leaders in the stroke community, representing a diverse sampling of specialties and affiliations. In October 2001, the Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification developed its consensus recommendations. This group included recognized experts in neurology, emergency medicine, emergency medical services, neurological surgery, neurointensive care, vascular disease, and stroke program planning. RESULTS: There are a variety of existing identification programs, generally falling within 1 of 4 categories (self-assessment, verification, certification, and accreditation) along a continuum with respect to intensity and scope of review and consumption of resources. Ten programs were evaluated, including Peer Review Organizations, trauma centers, and new efforts by the National Committee on Quality Assurance and the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations to identify providers and disease management programs. The largest body of literature on clinical outcomes associated with identification programs involves trauma centers. Most studies support that trauma centers and systems lead to improved mortality rates and patient outcomes. The Advisory Working Group felt that comparison to the trauma model was most relevant given the need for urgent evaluation and treatment of stroke. The literature in other areas generally supports the positive impact of identification programs, although patient outcomes data have less often been published. In the leadership interviews, participants generally expressed strong support for pursuing some form of voluntary identification program, although concerns were raised that this effort could meet with some resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of stroke centers and stroke systems competencies is in the best interest of stroke patients in the United States, and ASA should support the development and implementation of such processes. The purpose of a stroke center/systems identification program is to increase the capacity for all hospitals to treat stroke patients according to standards of care, recognizing that levels of involvement will vary according to the resources of hospitals and systems.

Impact of a voluntary trauma system on mortality, length of stay, and cost at a level I trauma center.

Trauma systems have been shown to decrease injury-related mortality; however, their development has been slow often requiring legislative codification. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a voluntary regional trauma system on outcomes at a Level I trauma center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center including all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during the periods April 1995 through March 1996 (T-1) and April 1997 through March 1998 (T-2). Our main outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, cost of care Compared with T-1 patients T-2 patients had lower mortality (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.71). A similar decline in mortality was observed for the entire six-county region compared with the remainder of the state. Among the most severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score > or = 16) T-2 patients had a shorter length of stay (16.5 vs 19.5 days; P < 0.05) and lower mean cost of care ($29,795 vs $34,983; P < 0.05). A voluntary trauma system can be implemented without the need for legislative mandate. After system implementation patient and financial outcomes were improved at an individual Level I trauma center.

An approach to coordinate efforts to reduce the public health burden of stroke: the Delta States Stroke Consortium.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and a leading cause of disability in the United States, with a particularly high burden on the residents of the southeastern states, a region dubbed the "Stroke Belt." These five states - Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee - have formed the Delta States Stroke Consortium to direct efforts to reduce this burden. The consortium is proposing an approach to identify domains where interventions may be instituted and an array of activities that can be implemented in each of the domains. Specific domains include 1) risk factor prevention and control; 2) identification of stroke signs and symptoms and encouragement of appropriate responses; 3) transportation, Emergency Medical Services care, and acute care; 4) secondary prevention; and 5) recovery and rehabilitation management. The array of activities includes 1) education of lay public; 2) education of health professionals; 3) general advocacy and legislative actions; 4) modification of the general environment; and 5) modification of the health care environment. The Delta States Stroke Consortium members propose that together these domains and activities define a structure to guide interventions to reduce the public health burden of stroke in this region.

Administrative challenges to regionalization.

The ideal emergency care system delivers the right care to the right patient at the right time and yields appropriate patient outcomes at a sustainable overall cost. Transforming the current system of emergency care into the Institute of Medicine's vision of a coordinated, regionalized, and accountable emergency care system requires careful consideration of administrative challenges and barriers. Left unaddressed, certain processes, systems, and structures may prevent integration efforts or threaten long-term viability.

The Southern Region burn disaster plan.

A regional burn disaster plan for 24 burn centers located in 11 states comprising the Southern Region of the American Burn Association was developed using online and in-person collaboration between burn center directors during a 2-year period. The capabilities and preferences of burn centers in the Southern Region were queried. A website with disaster information, including a map of regional burn centers and spreadsheet of driving distances between centers, was developed. Standard terminology for burn center capabilities during disasters was defined as open, full, diverting, offloading, or returning. A simple, scalable, and flexible disaster plan was designed. Activation and escalation of the plan revolves around the requirements of the end user, the individual burn center director. A key provision is the designation of a central communications point colocated at a burn center with several experienced burn surgeons. In a burn disaster, the burn center director can make a single phone call to the communications center, where a senior burn surgeon remote from the disaster can contact other burn centers and emergency agencies to arrange assistance. Available options include diversion of new admissions to the next closest center, transfer of patients to other regional centers, or facilitation of activation of federal plans to bring burn care providers to the affected burn center. Cooperation between regional burn center directors has produced a simple and flexible regional disaster plan at minimal cost to institute or operate.