RESUMEN
As microbiological tests play an important role in our diagnostic algorithms and clinical approach towards patients at-risk for pulmonary aspergillosis, a good knowledge of the diagnostic possibilities and especially their limitations is extremely important. In this review, we aim to reflect critically on the available microbiological diagnostic modalities for diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis and formulate some future prospects. Timely start of adequate antifungal treatment leads to a better patient outcome, but overuse of antifungals should be avoided. Current diagnostic possibilities are expanding, and are mainly driven by enzyme immunoassays and lateral flow device tests for the detection of Aspergillus antigens. Most of these tests are directed towards similar antigens, but new antibodies towards different targets are under development. For chronic forms of pulmonary aspergillosis, anti-Aspergillus IgG antibodies and precipitins remain the cornerstone. More studies on the possibilities and limitations of molecular testing including targeting resistance markers are ongoing. Also, metagenomic next-generation sequencing is expanding our future possibilities. It remains important to combine different test results and interpret them in the appropriate clinical context to improve performance. Test performances may differ according to the patient population and test results may be influenced by timing, the tested matrix, and prophylactic and empiric antifungal therapy. Despite the increasing armamentarium, a simple blood or urine test for the diagnosis of aspergillosis in all patient populations at-risk is still lacking. Research on diagnostic tools is broadening from a pathogen focus on biomarkers related to the patient and its immune system.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , Neumonía , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergillus , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , AnticuerposRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a major cause of mortality in immunocompromised patients and it is difficult to diagnose because of the lack of reliable highly sensitive diagnostics. We aimed to identify circulating immunological markers that could be useful for an early diagnosis of IA. METHODS: We collected longitudinally serum samples from 33 cases with probable/proven IA and two matched control cohorts without IA (one with microbiological and clinical evidence of bacterial or viral non-fungal pneumonia and one without evidence of infection, all matched for neutropenia, primary underlying disease, and receipt of corticosteroids/other immunosuppressants) at a tertiary university hospital. In addition, samples from an independent cohort (n = 20 cases of proven/probable IA and 20 matched controls without infection) were obtained. A panel of 92 circulating proteins involved in inflammation was measured by proximity extension assay. A random forest model was used to predict the development of IA using biomarkers measured before diagnosis. RESULTS: While no significant differences were observed between IA cases and infected controls, concentrations of 30 inflammatory biomarkers were different between cases and non-infected controls, of which nine were independently replicated: PD-L1, MMP-10, Interleukin(IL)-10, IL-15RA, IL-18, IL-18R1, CDCP1, CCL19 and IL-17C. From the differential abundance analysis of serum samples collected more than 10 days before diagnosis and at diagnosis, increased IL-17C concentrations in IA patients were replicated in the independent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: An increased circulating concentration of IL-17C was detected both in the discovery and independent cohort, both at the time of diagnosis and in samples 10 days before the diagnosis of IA, suggesting it should be evaluated further as potential (early) biomarker of infection.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Interleucina-17 , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Bioensayo , Hospitales Universitarios , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Moléculas de Adhesión CelularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is based on a combination of criteria, of which the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) often is decisive. To date, the most commonly used method to determine GM is an enzyme-linked immune assay (EIA). But since a few years lateral flow assays (LFAs) were introduced, providing the possibility for rapid single sample testing. More and more LFAs are entering the market, but, although often being equated, all use their own antibodies, procedures and interpretation criteria. A recent European survey revealed that about 24-33% of laboratories implemented a lateral flow assay on-site. METHODS: We conducted a survey at 81 Belgian hospital laboratories regarding the implementation of LFAs in their centre. In addition, we performed an extensive review of all publicly available studies on the performance of lateral flow assays to diagnose invasive aspergillosis. RESULTS: Response rate to the survey was 69%. Of the 56 responding hospital laboratories, 6 (11%) used an LFA. The Soña Aspergillus galactomannan LFA (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) was used in 4/6 centres, while two centres used the QuicGM (Dynamiker, Tianjin, China) and one centre used the FungiXpert Aspergillus Galactomannan Detection K-set LFA (Genobio [Era Biology Technology], Tianjin, China). One centre used 2 distinct LFAs. In 3/6 centres, the sample is sent to another lab for confirmation with GM-EIA when the LFA result is positive and in 2/6 when the LFA results is negative. In one centre, a confirmatory GM-EIA is always performed in house. In three centres the LFA result is used as a complete substitute for GM-EIA. Available LFA performance studies are very diverse and results vary in function of the study population and type of LFA. Apart from the IMMY and OLM LFA, only very limited performance data are available. From two out of three LFAs used in Belgium, no clinical performance studies are published in literature. CONCLUSIONS: A large variety of LFAs are used in Belgian Hospitals, some of which no clinical validation studies are published. These results do likely have implications for other parts of Europe and for the rest of the world as well. Due to the variable performance of LFA tests and the limited validation data available, each laboratory must check the available performance information of the specific test considered for implementation. In addition, laboratories should perform an implementation verification study.
RESUMEN
Early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is an important factor to improve survival but remains challenging. The detection of Aspergillus antigens is included in the consensus case definitions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group as a criterion of "probable" invasive aspergillosis. JF5, a mouse IgG3 monoclonal antibody detecting an Aspergillus mannoprotein, has already been implemented as a lateral flow device (LFD). Now, also a JF5-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) is commercialized (Aspergillus specific galactomannoprotein [GP] EIA, Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG). In this study, we analyzed the diagnostic performance of GP in 63 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) samples and 224 serum samples and compared it to performance of the galactomannan (GM) (Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France)) and the JF5-based LFD (AspLFD; OLM Diagnostics, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom). The diagnostic performance of GP and GM correlated well with both having high specificity. With an optimized cutoff threshold for positivity of 0.4-deviating from the 0.5 threshold recommended by the manufacturer-sensitivity of GP in serum is not significantly different than that of GM. However, in BALf sensitivity of GP is significantly less than for GM.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Animales , Ratones , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Mananos , Antígenos Fúngicos , Aspergillus , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción EnzimáticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Over the last years, severe respiratory viral infections, particularly those caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the influenza virus, have emerged as risk factor for viral-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (VAPA) among critically ill patients. Delays in diagnosis of VAPA are associated with increased mortality. Point-of-care-tests may play an important role in earlier diagnosis of VAPA and thus improve patient outcomes. AREAS COVERED: The following review will give an update on point-of-care tests for VAPA, analyzing performances in respiratory and blood specimens. EXPERT OPINION: Point-of-care tests have emerged, and particularly the IMMY Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay (LFA) shows performances comparable to the galactomannan ELISA for diagnosis of VAPA. Notably, nearly all evaluations of POC tests for VAPA have been performed in COVID-19 patients, with very limited data in influenza patients. For early diagnosis of COVID associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), the LFA has shown promising performances in respiratory samples, particularly in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and may thereby help in improving patient outcomes. In contrast, serum LFA testing may not be useful for early diagnosis of disease, except in cases with invasive tracheobronchial aspergillosis.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , COVID-19 , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Humanos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/complicaciones , Aspergillus , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Patients with haematological malignancies might develop life-threatening toxoplasmosis, especially after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Reactivation of latent cysts is the primary mechanism of toxoplasmosis following HSCT; hence, patients at high risk are those who were seropositive before transplantation. The lack of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and various immune status parameters of the patient are other associated risk factors. The mortality of toxoplasma disease-eg, with organ involvement-can be particularly high in this setting. We have developed guidelines for managing toxoplasmosis in haematology patients, through a literature review and consultation with experts. In allogeneic HSCT recipients seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii before transplant, because T gondii infection mostly precedes toxoplasma disease, we propose weekly blood screening by use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) to identify infection early as a pre-emptive strategy. As trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis might fail, prophylaxis and qPCR screening should be combined. However, PCR in blood can be negative even in toxoplasma disease. The duration of prophylaxis should be a least 6 months and extended during treatment-induced immunosuppression or severe CD4 lymphopenia. If a positive qPCR test occurs, treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine, or pyrimethamine-clindamycin should be started, and a new sample taken. If the second qPCR test is negative, clinical judgement is recommended to either continue or stop therapy and restart prophylaxis. Therapy must be continued until a minimum of two negative PCRs for infection, or for at least 6 weeks for disease. The pre-emptive approach is not indicated in seronegative HSCT recipients, after autologous transplantation, or in non-transplant haematology patients, but PCR should be performed with a high level of clinical suspicion.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmosis , Humanos , Toxoplasmosis/diagnóstico , Toxoplasmosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
We describe the fatal case of a patient with gastric perforation due to ischemia and necrosis of the stomach secondary to generalized vascular thrombosis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Histopathological examination of the resected stomach, spleen and omentum unexpectedly showed fungal hyphae suggestive of invasive mucormycosis. We retrospectively performed Mucorales PCR (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) in blood and tissue samples of this patient. The PCR was positive 16 days before time of death and 9 days before abdominal pain.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Serum Mucorales PCR can precede the final diagnosis of invasive mucormycosis by several days or weeks and could therefore be useful as a non-invasive screening tool. Methods: We assessed the performance of a commercial Mucorales PCR assay (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) on prospectively collected banked sera from hematology patients at risk for invasive mould infections. We evaluated if there is an underestimated incidence of missed Mucorales co-infections in patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA). We tested Mucorales PCR on the sera of all patients with a diagnosis of at least possible IA (EORTC-MSGERC consensus criteria) before the start of any antifungal therapy, and in a control group of similar high-risk hematology patients without IA (in a 1:4 ratio). When a positive Mucorales PCR was observed, at least 5 serum samples taken before and after the positive one were selected. Results: Mucorales PCR was performed in 46 diagnostic serum samples of cases and in 184 controls. Serum Mucorales PCR was positive in 4 cases of IA (8.7%; 12.9% of probable cases) and in 1 control case (0.5%) (p=0.0061, OR=17.43 (1.90-159.96). Post-mortem cultures of the positive control became positive for Rhizopus arrhizus. Mortality of IA cases with and without a positive Mucorales PCR was not significantly different. Only in the PCR positive control case, serial serum samples before and after the diagnostic sample were also positive. Discussion: It is not entirely clear what a positive Mucorales PCR in these cases implies since the 4 Mucorales PCR positive cases were treated with antifungals with activity against Mucorales. In addition, PCR was positive only once. This study does not provide enough evidence to implement Mucorales PCR screening. However, our findings emphasize once more the importance of considering the possibility of dual mould infections, even in patients with a positive galactomannan detection.
Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , Coinfección , Hematología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Mucorales , Mucormicosis , Humanos , Mucorales/genética , Mucormicosis/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Coinfección/diagnóstico , Aspergillus/genética , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) is recommended in Toxoplasma-seropositive allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients to prevent reactivation, but it is associated with numerous side effects. We report our experience of a pre-emptive approach guided by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients not receiving prophylaxis. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre experience, seropositive recipients and seronegative recipients receiving a graft from a seropositive donor were screened by PCR for the presence of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in peripheral blood until at least 6 months after transplantation. Confirmed PCR positivity triggered a pre-emptive anti-Toxoplasma therapy. Cases of Toxoplasma reactivation (using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation definitions) were compared with four controls (without reactivation), matched in time and recipient serostatus, to identify risk factors for reactivation by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: From November 2001 to August 2020, 1455 consecutive adult patients (59 cases and 1396 controls) were screened. The overall 1-year cumulative incidence of toxoplasmosis was 4.1% and the 1-year cumulative incidence in the seropositive recipients was 8.8%. Reactivation was associated with second transplant (OR 2.51, 95%CI 1.28-4.94, p 0.011), myeloablative conditioning (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.17-4.41, p 0.011), total body irradiation (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.17-4.44, p 0.010), acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.26-4.08, p 0.008) and use of high-dose corticosteroids (OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.14-3.78, p 0.018). In multivariate analysis only acute GvHD remained significant (adjusted OR 2.54, 95%CI 1.16-5.71, p 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: A PCR-based pre-emptive approach might serve as an acceptable alternative for patients unable to start with or to continue TMP-SMZ prophylaxis. Acute GvHD was identified as the single independent predictor for reactivation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmosis , Adulto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toxoplasma/genética , Toxoplasmosis/epidemiología , Toxoplasmosis/etiología , Toxoplasmosis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the absolute oral bioavailability of the solid oral formulation of posaconazole and the impact of severe intestinal mucositis in haematology patients. This study also aimed to describe posaconazole protein binding in haematology patients. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was performed of patients receiving induction chemotherapy or a haematopoietic cell transplantation who were randomized to receive 7 days of intravenous posaconazole therapy followed by 9 days of oral therapy, or vice versa. Patients received a posaconazole licensed dose until day 12, after which a reduced once-daily dose of 200 mg was given. At days 7, 12, and 16, blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic curves, and trough samples were collected on all other days. Total and unbound posaconazole pharmacokinetics were analyzed by population pharmacokinetic modelling. The presence of severe intestinal mucositis was assessed by plasma citrulline levels and analyzed as a binary covariate using 10 µmol/L as the cut-off. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to simulate posaconazole exposure at a steady state. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included for analysis, with 581 total posaconazole concentrations and 91 paired unbound concentrations. Absolute bioavailability in the final model was estimated at 51.4% (percentage relative standard error (%RSE): 56.5) and 67.6% (%RSE: 75.0) in patients with and without severe intestinal mucositis, respectively. Posaconazole unbound fraction was estimated at 2.7% (%RSE: 3.9). DISCUSSION: Posaconazole bioavailability is reduced in haematological patients with severe intestinal mucositis, requiring an increase in oral posaconazole dose to 400 mg twice daily on day 1, followed by 400 mg once daily or a switch to intravenous therapy.