A Comparison of Familial and Sporadic Type 1 Diabetes Among Young Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate natural course, treatment, and outcomes in familial versus sporadic type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a population-based study, we compared patients with onset of type 1 diabetes before the age of 20 years who had a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes (familial diabetes) with patients with type 1 diabetes who had no first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes (sporadic diabetes) at diagnosis and over the first 10 treatment years, using multivariable regression and proportional hazards models. Patients were identified from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV) between 1995 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 57,371 patients with type 1 diabetes, 53,606 (93.4%) had sporadic diabetes and 3,765 (6.6%) had familial diabetes. Familial diabetes, compared with sporadic diabetes, was associated with younger age (median 7.9 vs. 9.7 years, P < 0.001), lower prevalence of ketoacidosis (11.9% vs. 20.4%, P < 0.001), and lower HbA1c levels (9.7% vs. 11.1%, P < 0.001) at onset and higher prevalence of associated autoimmune disease (16.7% vs. 13.6%, P < 0.001). Over 10 years, patients with familial diabetes, in comparison with sporadic diabetes, more often used insulin pumps (P < 0.001) and had a lower rate of severe hypoglycemia (12.97 vs. 14.44 per 100 patient-years, P < 0.001) but similar HbA1c levels (P ≥ 0.08) and ketoacidosis rates (1.85 vs. 2.06 per 100 patient-years, P = 0.11). In familial and sporadic diabetes, absence of ketoacidosis at onset predicted fewer events of severe hypoglycemia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, P < 0.001, and 0.91, P < 0.001, respectively) and of ketoacidosis (HR 0.64, P = 0.007, and 0.66, P < 0.001, respectively) after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Familial type 1 diabetes, compared with sporadic type 1 diabetes, is characterized by earlier disease manifestation and higher autoimmune comorbidity as well as less metabolic decompensation at onset, likely related to higher disease awareness in affected families, while the course of disease is similar. These findings may have implications for the generalizability of results of diabetes prevention trials from patients with familial type 1 diabetes to patients with sporadic type 1 diabetes.

Intermittently Scanned Glucose Values for Continuous Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in 1809 Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.

Background and Objective: Intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) is increasingly used for glycemic monitoring in diabetes care. In this cross-sectional real-world analysis, iscCGM data were compared to traditional parameters of glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Using the DPV registry, most recent data from children and adolescents aged <18 years with uploaded iscCGM sensor profiles with at least 14 days of data and a > 50% completeness were evaluated using recommended parameters of sensor metrics. Analysis was performed stratified by age group, glycemic control, and type of therapy; data were taken from DPV data pool in February 2020. Results: Glucose sensor profiles and clinical data from 1809 individuals (mean age 13.4 years, 53% male, and mean diabetes duration 5.02 years) were evaluated in this study. More than 50% of this population (n = 965) reached the current German treatment target of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.5%. In this target, the mean scanning frequency was higher than in groups with HbA1c >7.5 or >8.0% (12.0 vs. 10.2 vs 7.6 times per day). The group of preschool children had the highest frequency of scanning (16.6 vs. 13.3 times per day in school kids and 7.9 in adolescents), the lowest HbA1c level, and the lowest risk for hypoglycemia (low blood glucose index 0.8 vs. 1.0 vs 1.2). Conclusion: Real-world data will help to determine the value of iscCGM to improve clinical and patient-related outcomes in pediatric diabetology. Not only the use of a device but also the intensity of use seems to have a high and direct impact on glycemic control.