RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 outbreak has been associated with a wide variety of psychiatric manifestations such as panic, anxiety, and depression. We aim to assess the impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic on the levels of stress and depression of pregnant women in Mexico. METHODS: A cross-sectional web survey was carried out in pregnant women in 10 states of the Mexican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic among public and private hospitals. The perception of stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale, while depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. RESULTS: A total of 549 surveys were applied, of which 96.1% (n = 503) were included in the data analysis. The mean participant's age was 28.1 years old. The mean perceived stress scale score was 24. 33.2% (n = 167) of participants had a score equal to 27 points or more and were considered highly stressed. The mean depression score was 9. A total of 17.5% (n = 88) participants had more than 14 points on the Edinburgh's depression scale, and were considered depressed. Stress levels were higher at later gestational ages (p = .008). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemic has caused mental health issues in pregnant women reflected by high perceived stress levels and depression.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Pandemias , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicologíaRESUMEN
We report a case of Sirenomelia. The mother began prenatal care in the second trimester. Transabdominal ultrasound was determined anhydramnios, cardiac abnormalities and lumbosacral spine. We obtained a single fetus of 21 weeks' gestation with fused lower extremities from the hip to finish in a stump without the presence of feet. Heart with transposition of the great vessels, among other birth defects. It was classified as symelia, Apodi apus, monopodio sirenoide, siren ectropodia, type VI. It is important to diagnose early, because it is a serious and deadly disorder.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Ectromelia/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías Múltiples/embriología , Anomalías Múltiples/patología , Aborto Terapéutico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Tardío , Ectromelia/embriología , Ectromelia/patología , Cara/anomalías , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Riñón/anomalías , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
Resumen INTRODUCCIÓN: En Estados Unidos, las cardiopatías periparto se registran en 1 de cada 4000 pacientes. Se consideran idiopáticas y se asocian con enfermedades genéticas, problemas inmunológicos y malformaciones cardiacas, sin que se tenga certeza del origen real de este tipo de enfermedades. La miocardiopatía periparto se asocia con el embarazo y el puerperio; los criterios diagnósticos incluyen: a) insuficiencia cardiaca en las últimas cuatro semanas del embarazo o en los cinco meses siguientes al parto, b) ausencia de causas identificables de insuficiencia cardiaca, c) ausencia de enfermedad cardiaca demostrable antes de las últimas cuatro semanas del embarazo y alteración de la función del ventrículo izquierdo (fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo, menor del 45%). La presentación del caso ayudará a que se tenga conocimiento de este problema. CASO CLINICO: Paciente de 26 años, en curso de las 35.4 semanas de embarazo, con inicio abrupto de signos de cardiopatía congestiva: tos, edema, taquicardia e hipertensión arterial. El embarazo finalizó por cesárea, con traslado inmediato a la unidad de cuidados intensivos. La ecocardiografía reportó una valvulopatía no conocida, insuficiencia ventricular izquierda y disminución de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo; con lo anterior se integró el diagnóstico de miocardiopatía periparto. CONCLUSIONES: Las cardiopatías periperiparto son alteraciones excepcionales, con cuadros clínicos debidamente definidos y diagnóstico complejo. Las valvulopatías son el último diagnóstico diferencial de cardiopatía congestiva peripuerperal y se han descrito pocos casos asociados con miocardiopatía periparto.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Peripartum heart disease occurs in 1 out of 4000 cases in the United States; currently, its exact origin is unknown, which is why they are called idiopathic. Genetic diseases, immunological problems and heart malformations have been associated, without being certain about the real origin of these pathologies. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare pathology associated with pregnancy and the puerperium, the diagnosis criteria includes: a) Development of heart failure in the last month of pregnancy or in the 5 months after delivery, b) absence of identifiable causes of heart failure, c) absence of demonstrable heart disease prior to the last month of pregnancy and impaired left ventricular function (FEVI less than 45%). The presentation of the case will help to raise awareness about this problem. CLINICAL CASE: A 26-year-old female patient coursing second gestation in the 35.4 pregnancy week, who debuts abruptly with signs of congestive heart disease such as cough, edema, tachycardia and arterial hypertension. The pregnancy was solved by cesarean section with a subsequent stay in Intensive Care Unit, an unknown valvular disease was identified by echocardiography, as well as left ventricular failure and decreased FEVI. Finally, a definitive diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy was integrated. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum heart disease is a rare occurrence, with well-defined clinical pictures, but difficult to approach and diagnose. Where valvular heart disease is the last differential diagnosis for peripuerperal congestive heart disease, and few cases associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy have been described.
RESUMEN
Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Entre las neoplasias epiteliales ováricas, los cistoadenomas son los más comunes y casi todos son de buen pronóstico. Pueden aparecer a cualquier edad, aunque gran parte surgen entre los 40 y 60 años. CASO CLÍNICO: Paciente de 63 años, con necrosis seca distal en el antepié derecho, con un cistoadenofibroma seroso en el ovario izquierdo que ocluía una arteria iliaca común y causó una trombosis distal que requirió intervención quirúrgica y amputación transmetatarsiana derecha. CONCLUSIÓN: El diagnóstico y tratamiento quirúrgico oportuno son decisivos para evitar la extensión de la necrosis y lograr la conservación de la mayor parte de la extremidad afectada.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Among ovarian epithelial neoplasms, cystadenomas are the most common and almost all of them have a good prognosis. They can appear at any age, although most arise between 40 and 60 years of age. CLINICAL CASE: A 63-year-old patient with distal dry necrosis in the right forefoot, with a serous cystadenofibroma in the left ovary that occluded a common iliac artery and caused a distal thrombosis that required surgical intervention and right transmetatarsal amputation. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis and surgical treatment are decisive to avoid the extension of necrosis and to achieve the preservation of most of the affected limb.
RESUMEN
Resumen: OBJETIVO: Determinar la efectividad de la indometacina, por vía rectal, en el tratamiento del dolor posthisterectomía versus paracetamol o metamizol administrados por vía intravenosa. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio experimental, comparativo y prospectivo llevado a cabo en el Hospital Central del Estado de Chihuahua entre noviembre y diciembre de 2019. Criterios de inclusión: pacientes histerectomizadas, con expediente clínico completo y de cualquier edad. Criterios de exclusión: pacientes con alteraciones en el umbral del dolor, inconsistencias en el expediente, histerectomía total no ginecológica. Criterios de eliminación: pacientes con limitantes en la información que no permitieron relacionar la variable dependiente con la independiente. El seguimiento del dolor referido se efectuó con la escala análoga del dolor y valoraciones a las 12 y 24 horas posteriores a la cirugía. RESULTADOS: Se reunieron 141 pacientes, que se dividieron en tres grupos. Grupo 1: metamizol intravenoso e indometacina por vía rectal (n = 24). Grupo 2: paracetamol intravenoso e indometacina por vía rectal (n = 19). Grupo 3: paracetamol y metamizol intravenosos (n = 98). La mayoría de las pacientes de los grupos 1 y 2 reportaron, a las 24 h, una escala visual análoga menor de 3 vs las del grupo 3. Diez de 98 pacientes requirieron tratamiento en el servicio de Anestesiología. CONCLUSIÓN: La administración de indometacina por vía rectal a pacientes histerectomizadas demostró menor dolor que con metamizol y paracetamol, y evolución clínica y alta hospitalaria más temprana.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of indomethacin in the treatment of post-hysterectomy pain versus paracetamol or metamizole administered intravenously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental, comparative and prospective study at the Central Hospital of the State of Chihuahua, period November to December 2019, patients undergoing hysterectomy with complete clinical record, any age. Patients with alterations in the pain threshold, inconsistencies in the file, total non-gynecological hysterectomy were excluded, patients with information limitations were eliminated, which did not allow to relate the dependent variable, with the independent one. RESULTS: 141 patients were collected, which were divided into three groups. Group 1: intravenous metamizole and indomethacin rectally (n = 24). Group 2: intravenous paracetamol and indomethacin rectally (n = 19). Group 3: intravenous paracetamol and metamizole (n = 98). Most of the patients in groups 1 and 2 reported, at 24 hours, a visual analog scale of less than 3 vs those of group 3. Ten of 98 patients required treatment in the Anesthesiology service. CONCLUSION: The administration of indomethacin rectally in postoperative patients of hysterectomy has been shown to reduce pain more effectively than conventional analgesics such as metamizole and paracetamol, relating to clinical evolution and early hospital discharge.