Impact of Switching from Twice-Daily Basal Insulin to Once-Daily Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in People with Type 1 Diabetes on Basal-Bolus Insulin: Phase 4 OPTIMIZE Study.

INTRODUCTION: OPTIMIZE evaluated the efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction of insulin glargine 300 U/mL once daily (Gla-300 OD) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) previously uncontrolled on basal insulin twice daily (BID) as part of basal-bolus therapy. METHODS: OPTIMIZE was a 28-week, prospective, interventional, single-arm phase 4 trial in adults with T1DM. At baseline, basal insulin BID treatment was switched to Gla-300 OD titrated to a fasting self-monitored blood glucose target of 4.4-7.2 mmol/L (80-130 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was the mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included self-monitored blood glucose, fasting-plasma glucose, hypoglycaemia and patient-reported outcomes including the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs). RESULTS: Switching to Gla-300 OD significantly improved mean HbA1c (8.54% at baseline and 8.27% at week 24 [last observation carried forward, N = 94, p < 0.0001]; mean difference 0.27% [95% CI 0.15, 0.40]). There was a statistically significant decrease in fasting self-monitored blood glucose during the study (analysis of variance for repeated measures, p = 0.014; N = 72). Eight-point self-monitored blood glucose was significantly improved between baseline and week 24 for post-breakfast (p = 0.009), post-dinner (p = 0.009) and bedtime (p = 0.049) values. The study did not allow for any significant effects on confirmed and/or severe hypoglycaemia at the ≤ 3.9 mmol/L [≤ 70 mg/dL] or < 3.0 mmol/L [< 54 mg/dL] blood glucose cut-offs to be observed. Statistically significant improvements were observed in DTSQs total scores from baseline (24.1) to week 24 (29.4, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A basal-bolus regimen including Gla-300 OD was associated with improvements in HbA1c and treatment satisfaction in people with uncontrolled T1DM previously receiving basal-bolus insulin including a basal insulin BID analogue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2015-001186-46.

Patient-Reported Outcomes with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in People with Type 2 Diabetes: The MAGE Multicenter Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: MAGE was a Multicenter, single-Arm, observational 6-month (plus 6-month extension) study that aimed to assess treatment satisfaction, efficacy, and safety of insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) receiving basal-bolus insulin in a rEal-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were at least 18 years old, with T2DM for more than 1 year, HbA1c 7.0-10.0%. The primary endpoint was change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) total score (baseline to month 6). Secondary endpoints included reasons for starting Gla-300, changes in the DTSQ change version (DTSQc) total score, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) total behavior and worry scores at months 6 and 12, HbA1c changes at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, and safety. RESULTS: MAGE included 87 adults (mean T2DM duration 17 years). The primary endpoint of DTSQs mean (standard deviation) total score improvement at month 6 was achieved (2.80 [5.46] points; p < 0.0001). The main reasons for Gla-300 initiation were to decrease HbA1c (89.7% of participants) and reduce the number of hypoglycemic events (35.6% of participants). Significant improvements were observed in the DTSQc total score and perceived hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia (baseline to month 6, p < 0.05). Significant changes in HFS-II behavior, worry, and total scores at 6 and 12 months were also observed (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant changes in HbA1c. Safety outcomes, including hypoglycemia, were comparable to previously reported trials. CONCLUSIONS: The MAGE study indicates that Gla-300, as part of a basal-bolus regimen, results in improved treatment satisfaction and reduced hypoglycemia fear in people with advanced T2DM.

Performance evaluation of the Precision PCx point-of-care blood glucose analyzer using discriminant ratio methodology.

Point-of-care glucose testing needs to be integrated into a laboratory information system to provide continuous care. Selecting a particular glucose monitoring system is based on both analytical performance and on user's preference. We evaluated accuracy, performance and regulatory compliance of the Precision PCx glucose analyzer (Abbott), with automatic download into a central station, for remote quality control (QC) management and automatic upgrading. We used the discriminant ratio (DR) methodology, which determines the DR of a test (e.g. the ratio between the underlying SD and the within-subject SD), and compares it to that of another test allegedly measuring the same parameter. Accuracy was evaluated by Clarke's error grid method. Seven hundred and ninety four blood samples were taken from 22 diabetic patients, combined with two capillary blood samples: one for analysis by reference method and the second for PCx analysis. Linear regression analysis revealed, over a 2.1 to 26.9 mmol/l glucose concentration range, a correlation coefficient of 0.963, an intercept of 0.7 mmol/l and a slope of 0.851. Mean difference between meter-generated results and the reference method was -7.1+/-10.8%. Between-run imprecision for PCx using Abbott's controls at low and mid-low concentrations was 5.4 and 3.8%, respectively. Clarke's error grid did not show any clinical impact related to difference between methods. DRs were of similar magnitude using both methods. Nursing staff found PCx easy for everyday use. Our data show that PCx results agree with those obtained with the reference method, as shown by lack of significant difference in DRs, and by excellent correlation.