Quantitative evaluation of hepatic steatosis using attenuation imaging in a pediatric population: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and fatty-liver disease are increasingly common in children. Hepatic steatosis is becoming the most common cause of chronic liver disease during childhood. There is a need for noninvasive imaging methods that are easily accessible, safe and do not require sedation in the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the diagnostic role of ultrasound attenuation imaging (ATI) in the detection and staging of fatty liver in the pediatric age group was investigated using the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction as the reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 children with both ATI and MRI constituted the study group. Fatty liver was classified as mild (S1, defined as ≥ 5% steatosis), moderate (S2, defined as ≥ 10% steatosis), or severe (S3, defined as ≥ 20% steatosis) according to MRI-proton density fat fraction values. MRI studies were performed on the same 1.5-tesla (T) MR device without sedation and contrast agent. Ultrasound examinations were performed independently by two radiology residents blinded to the MRI data. RESULTS: While no steatosis was detected in half of the cases, S1 steatosis was found in 31 patients (22.1%), S2 in 29 patients (20.7%) and S3 in 10 patients (7.1%). A strong correlation was found between attenuation coefficient and MRI-proton density fat fraction values (r = 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of ATI were calculated as 0.944 for S > 0, 0.976 for S > 1 and 0.970 for S > 2, based on 0.65, 0.74 and 0.91 dB/cm/MHz cut-off values, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the inter-observer agreement and test-retest reproducibility were calculated as 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound attenuation imaging is a promising noninvasive method for the quantitative evaluation of fatty liver disease.

A confounding rib variation: bilateral symmetric aberrant posterior rib articulations and bridgings.

INTRODUCTION: Although mild bone angulation with osseous enlargement often suggests fractures with callus formation, in some cases the diagnosis is synchondrosis. CASE REPORT: We present a rare variation of the chest wall in a 15-year-old male with a history of lymphoma. Bilateral multi-level posterior rib enlargements revealing mild 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake were detected via positron-emission tomography/computed tomography. The variations were identified as healing fractures, although the more accurate diagnosis was determined to be multi-level posterior rib synchondroses with consecutive bridgings. Although variant bone anatomies are commonly seen in radiological practice, such multiple symmetrical posterior rib synchondroses associated with consecutive bridgings and articulations have not been clearly demonstrated before. CONCLUSION: Awareness of such a rare combination of a well-known variation is crucial for radiologists to exclude malignancies, possibility of fracture and suspicion of child abuse.

Oncologic results of laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: There are scant data regarding oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The aim of this study is to analyze the oncologic outcomes of LLR for malignant liver tumors (MLT). METHODS: This was a prospective IRB-approved study of 123 patients with MLT undergoing LLR. Kaplan-Meier disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated. RESULTS: Tumor type was colorectal in 61%, hepatocellular cancer in 21%, neuroendocrine in 5% and others in 13%. Mean tumor size was 3.2 ± 1.9 cm and number of tumors 1.6 ± 1.2. A wedge resection or segmentectomy was performed in 63.4%, bisegmentectomy in 24.4%, and hemihepatectomy in 12.2%. Procedures were totally laparoscopic in 67% and hand-assisted in 33%. Operative time was 235.2 ± 94.3 min, and conversion rate 7.3%. An R0 resection was achieved in 90% of patients and 94% of tumors. Median hospital stay was 3 days. Morbidity was 22% and mortality 0.8%. For patients with colorectal liver metastasis, DFS and OS at 2 years was 47% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LLR is a safe and efficacious treatment for selected patients with MLT. Complete resection and margin recurrence rate are comparable to open series in the literature.

The utility of neck ultrasound and sestamibi scans in patients with secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (THPT) are disease entities in patients with chronic kidney disease that are caused by parathyroid hyperplasia. The role of preoperative localization studies in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for these conditions remains poorly defined. AIM: To evaluate the utility of surgeon-performed neck ultrasound (US) as well as sestamibi scans in the localization of parathyroid glands in patients with SHPT/THPT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with SHPT/THPT who underwent parathyroidectomy at a single institution. Results of preoperative localization studies were compared to intraoperative findings. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients underwent parathyroidectomy for SHPT/THPT. All patients underwent surgeon-performed neck US, while 92 (89%) underwent sestamibi scans. US failed to localize any of the parathyroids in 4 patients (3.8%), while sestamibi was negative in 11 (12%). Forty-seven ectopic glands were identified in 38 patients in whom sestamibi was performed. In five patients (13%), ectopic glands were identified by both modalities, by US only in 6 (16%), by sestamibi only in 8 (21%), and by neither study in 19 patients (50%). US showed new thyroid nodules in 19 patients (18.4 %), leading to lobectomy or thyroidectomy at the time of parathyroidectomy in 16 patients (15.5%). Pathology showed malignancy in 7 patients (6.8%). CONCLUSION: US and MIBI offer little benefit in localizing ectopic glands and rarely change the conduct of a standard four-gland exploration. Although there was a benefit of US in the assessment of thyroid nodules, in only 8.7% of patients was sestamibi of benefit in identifying ectopic glands.

A critical analysis of postoperative morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: Although the laparoscopic approach provides certain advantages over the percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA), the morbidity needs to be defined. The aim of this study is to analyze the morbidity and underlying risk factors after laparoscopic RFA of liver tumors. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2012, 910 patients underwent 1,207 RFA procedures for malignant liver tumors in a tertiary academic center. The 90-day morbidity and mortality were extracted from a prospective IRB-approved database. Statistical analyses were performed using regression, t, and χ (2) tests. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 50 patients (4 %) and were gastrointestinal in 13 patients (1.1 %), infections in 10 (0.8 %), hemorrhagic in 9 (0.7 %), urinary in 7 (0.6 %), cardiac in 4 (0.3 %), pulmonary in 3 (0.3 %), hematologic in 2 (0.2 %), and neurologic in 2 (0.2 %). The complication rates for an RFA done alone (5 %) versus concomitantly with ancillary procedure (6 %) were similar (p = .6). In all patients who developed postoperative bleeding from the liver, the ablations had been performed on lesions located in the right posterior sector. Of 9 patients with bleeding, 5 (55 %) required a laparotomy. Also, 60 % of liver abscesses occurred in patients with a prior bilioenteric anastomosis (BEA). The 90-day mortality was 0.4 % (n = 5). Hospital stay was 1.2 ± 0.1 days and was prolonged to 4.4 ± 0.3 days in case of complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the morbidity and mortality to be expected after a laparoscopic RFA procedure. Our results show that additional caution should be used to prevent bleeding complications in patients with tumors located in the right posterior sector and infections in patients with a history of BEA.

Initial experience with a new articulating energy device for laparoscopic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Although significant advances have been made in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), most techniques still rely on multiple energy devices and staplers, which increase operative costs. The aim of this study was to report the initial results of a new multifunctional energy device for hepatic parenchymal transection. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent LLR using this new device were compared to 20 patients who had LLR using current laparoscopic techniques (CL). Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: The groups were similar demographics and tumor type and size. Although the type of resection was similar between the groups, the parenchymal transection time was less in the Caiman group (32 ± 5 vs. 63 ± 4 min, respectively, p = 0.0001). The operative time was similar (194 ± 21 vs. 233 ± 16 min, respectively, p = 0.158). There was reduction of the number of advanced instrumentation used in the Caiman group, including the staplers. Estimated blood loss, size of surgical margin, and hospital stay were similar. There was no mortality, and morbidity was 7 % in the Caiman and 20 % in the CL group. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study shows that the new device is safe and efficient for LLR. Its main advantage is shortening of hepatic parenchymal transection time. This has implications for increasing efficiency and cost saving in LLR.

The utility of intraoperative ultrasound in modified radical neck dissection: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Although the value of surgeon-performed neck ultrasound (SPUS) for thyroid nodules has been validated, the utility of intraoperative ultrasound (US) in modified radical neck dissection (MRND) has not been reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to analyze the utility of intraoperative SPUS in assessing the completeness of MRND for thyroid cancer. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, a total of 25 patients underwent MRND by 1 surgeon for thyroid cancer. All patients underwent intraoperative SPUS, which was repeated at the end of the neck dissection (completion US) to look for missed lymph nodes (LNs). RESULTS: There were 10 male and 15 female patients. Pathology included 23 papillary and 2 medullary carcinomas. The number of LNs removed per case was 23 ± 2, and the number of positive was LNs 5 ± 1. In 4 (16%) cases, intraoperative US detected 7 residual LNs, which would have been missed, if completion US were not done. These missed LNs were located in low-level IV (3 nodes), high-level II (2 nodes), and posterior level V (2 nodes) and measured 1.4 ± 0.2 cm. At follow-up, recurrence was seen in 2 (8%) patients, including a superior mediastinal recurrence in a patient with tall cell cancer and a jugular LN recurrence at level II in another patient with papillary thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that intraoperative SPUS can help assess the completeness of MRND. According to our results, intraoperative completion US identifies LNs missed by palpation 16% of the time.

Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Although initial reports demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic adrenalectomy (RA), there are scant data on the use of this approach for pheochromocytoma. The aim of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes and efficacy of RA versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma. METHODS: Within 3 years, 25 patients underwent 26 RA procedures for pheochromocytoma. These patients were compared with 40 patients who underwent 42 LA procedures before the start of the robotic program. Data were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved adrenal database. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical parameters at presentation were similar between the groups, except for a larger tumor size in the robotic group. In both groups, skin-to-skin operative time, estimated blood loss less, and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were similar. The conversion to open rate was 3.9 % in the robotic and 7.5 % in the laparoscopic group (p = .532). There was no morbidity or mortality in the robotic group; morbidity was 10 % (p = .041) and mortality 2.5 % in the laparoscopic group. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was lower, and the length of hospital stay shorter in the robotic group (1.2 ± .1 vs. 1.7 ± .1 days, p = .036). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing robotic versus laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma. Our results show that the robotic approach is similar to the laparoscopic regarding safety and efficacy. The lower morbidity, less immediate postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay observed in the robotic approach warrant further investigation in future larger studies.

Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we demonstrated better perioperative outcomes with robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) with the posterior retroperitoneal approach in general, and for removal of large adrenal tumors. It is unknown if robotic adrenalectomy (RA) is equivalent to LA in obese patients. The aim of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes of RA versus LA in obese patients. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2012, 99 obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) patients underwent adrenalectomy at a tertiary academic center. Of these, 42 patients had RA and 57 had LA. The perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared between the RA and LA groups. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained, institutional review board approved database. Clinical and perioperative parameters were analyzed using Student t and χ(2) tests. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and tumor side. Body mass index was lower in the robotic versus laparoscopic group (35.4 ± 1.0 vs. 38.8 ± 0.8 kg/m(2), respectively, p = 0.01). Tumor size (4.0 ± 0.4 vs. 4.3 ± 0.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.56), skin-to-skin operative time (186.1 ± 12.1 vs. 187.3 ± 11 min, respectively, p = 0.94), estimated blood loss (50.3 ± 24.3 vs. 76.6 ± 21.3 ml, respectively, p = 0.42), and hospital stay (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 days, respectively, p = 0.06) were similar in both groups. The conversion to open rate was zero in the robotic and 5.2 % in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.06). The 30-day morbidity was 4.8 % in the robotic and 7 % in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show any difference in perioperative outcomes between RA and LA in obese patients. These results suggest that the difficulties in maintaining exposure and dissection in obese patients nullify the advantages of robotic articulating versus rigid laparoscopic instruments in adrenal surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open resection of colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Findings have shown laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) to be feasible and safe, but the data in the literature regarding oncologic outcomes are scant. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes between LLR and open resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). METHODS: Between January 2006 and April 2012, 40 patients underwent LLR of CLM. These patients were compared with a consecutive matched group of 40 patients who underwent open resection within the same period. Data were obtained from a prospective institutional review board (IRB)-approved database. Statistical analysis was performed using t test, Chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier survival. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, tumor size, number of tumors, and type of resections performed. The operative time was similar in the two groups, but the estimated blood loss was less in the LLR group than in the open resection group. The length of stay was shorter in the LLR group (3.7 vs 6.5 days; p < 0.001). The 2-year overall survival rate was 89 % for LLR and 81 % for open resection. The median disease-free survival time was 23 months in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that LLR is associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay than open resection for CLM. According to our short-term results, LLR is equivalent to open resection in terms of oncologic outcomes.

Robotic endocrine surgery: state of the art.

Over the last decade, developments in technology have led a rapid progress in robotic endocrine surgery applications. Robotics is attractive to the surgeon because of the three-dimensional image quality, articulating instruments, and stable surgical platform. Safety and effectiveness of robotic adrenalectomy and thyroidectomy have been shown in many studies. While these robotic procedures offer better ergonomics for the surgeon, they provide similar outcomes compared to the laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy and better cosmetic results versus the conventional option for thyroidectomy. Recently, while the robotic approach for adrenalectomy has been popularized, enthusiasm for robotic thyroidectomy has decreased. In the present review we aim to describe emerging robotic procedures and review the literature regarding outcomes.

Complementary use of resection and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: an analysis of 395 patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two surgical options in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to analyze patient characteristics and outcomes after resection and RFA for CLM from a single center. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 395 patients with CLM undergoing RFA (n = 295), liver resection (n = 94) or both (n = 6) were identified from a prospective IRB-approved database. Demographic, clinical and survival data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: RFA patients had more comorbidities, number of liver tumors and a higher incidence of extrahepatic disease compared to the Resection patients. The 5-year overall actual survival was 17 % in the RFA, 58 % in the Resection group (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, multiple liver tumors, dominant lesion >3 cm, and CEA >10 ng/ml were independent predictors of overall survival. Patients were followed for a median of 20 ± 1 months. Liver and extrahepatic recurrences were seen in 69 %, and 29 % of the patients in the RFA, and 40 %, and 19 % of the patients in the Resection group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large surgical series, we described the characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing resection or RFA for CLM. By having both options available, we were able to surgically treat a large number of patients presenting with different degrees of liver tumor burden and co-morbidities, and also manage liver recurrences in follow-up.

The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection.

BACKGROUND: Although the utility of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in thyroidectomy has been extensively demonstrated, there is little experience regarding its use for neck dissections. METHODS: Within 10 years, 119 patients underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for thyroid cancer. In 51 patients, MRND was performed using conventional knot tying and in 68 using the HS. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), drain output, duration of the drainage, and complications were compared for 47 patients undergoing first-time unilateral MRND without concomitant additional surgical procedures. RESULTS: The number of LNs removed, operative time, duration of drainage, and rate of lymphatic leak were similar between groups. For the HS group, EBL (5 ± 3 vs 32 ± 10; P = .006) and drain output on postoperative day 1 (51.7 ± 6.2 vs 78.9 ± 11.9; P = .02) and at 1 week (6.1 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .03) were significantly less. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of its retrospective nature, this study shows that the HS reduces EBL and the amount of lymphatic drainage compared to knot tying after MRND.

A comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus systemic therapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis to the liver.

OBJECTIVES: There is controversy about the roles of locoregional therapies in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (LMBC). The aim of this study was to analyse survival after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of LMBC and to compare this with survival in patients receiving systemic therapy (ST) alone. METHODS: During 1996-2011, 24 patients who had failed to respond or had shown an incomplete response to ST underwent laparoscopic RFA for LMBC. Outcomes in these patients were compared with those in 32 patients with LMBC matched by tumour size and number, but treated with ST alone. Clinical parameters and overall survival were compared using t-tests, chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The groups were similar in hormone receptor status and chemotherapy exposure. In the laparoscopic RFA and ST groups, respectively, the mean ± standard deviation size of the dominant liver tumour and the number of tumours per patient were 3.7 ± 0.4 cm and 2.4 ± 0.4 cm, and 2.6 ± 0.4 tumours and 3.3 ± 0.4 tumours, respectively. These differences were not significant. At a median follow-up of 20 months in the laparoscopic RFA group, 42% of patients were found to have developed local liver recurrence, 63% had developed new liver disease and 38% had developed extrahepatic disease. Overall survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 47 months in the laparoscopic RFA group and 9 months in the ST-only group (P = 0.0001). Five-year survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 29% in the RFA group and 0% in the ST-only group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare outcomes in RFA and ST, respectively, in LMBC. The results show that survival after laparoscopic RFA plus ST is better than that after ST alone.

Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Although recent studies have shown the feasibility and safety of robotic adrenalectomy, an advantage over the laparoscopic approach has not been demonstrated. Our hypothesis was that the use of the robot would facilitate minimally invasive resection of large adrenal tumors. METHODS: Adrenal tumors≥5 cm resected robotically were compared with those removed laparoscopically from a prospective institutional review board-approved adrenal database. Clinical and perioperative parameters were analyzed using t and chi-square tests. All data are expressed as mean±standard error of mean. RESULTS: There were 24 patients with 25 tumors in the robotic group and 38 patients with 38 tumors in the laparoscopic group. Tumor size was similar in both groups (6.5±0.4 [robotic] vs 6.2±0.3 cm [laparoscopic], P=.661). Operative time was shorter for the robotic versus laparoscopic group (159.4±13.4 vs 187.2±8.3 min, respectively, P=.043), while estimated blood loss was similar (P=.147). The conversion to open rate was less in the robotic (4%) versus the laparoscopic (11%) group; P=.043. Hospital stay was shorter for the robotic group (1.4±0.2 vs 1.9±0.1 days, respectively, P=.009). The 30-day morbidity was 0 in robotic and 2.7% in laparoscopic group. Pathology was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the use of the robot could shorten operative time and decrease the rate of conversion to open for adrenal tumors larger than 5 cm. Based on our favorable experience, robotic adrenalectomy has become our preferred minimally invasive surgical approach for removing large adrenal tumors.

Malfunction and failure of robotic systems during general surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: There has been recent interest in using robots for general surgical procedures. This shift in technique raises the issue of patient safety with automated instrumentation. Although the safety of robotics has been established for urologic procedures, there are scant data on its use in general surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of robotic malfunction and its consequences for general surgical procedures. METHODS: All robotic general surgical procedures performed at a tertiary center between 2008 and 2011 were reviewed from institutional review board (IRB)-approved prospective databases. RESULTS: A total of 223 cases were done robotically, including 102 endocrine, 83 hepatopancreaticobiliary, 17 upper gastrointestinal, and 21 lower gastrointestinal colorectal procedures. There were 10 cases of robotic malfunction (4.5%). These failures were related to robotic instruments (n = 4), optical system (n = 3), robotic arms (n = 2), and robotic console (n = 1). None of these failures led to adverse patient consequences or conversion to open. Six (2.7%) cases were converted to open due to bleeding (n = 3), difficult dissection plane (n = 1), invasion of tumor to surrounding structures (n = 1), and intolerance of pneumoperitoneum due to CO(2) retention (n = 1). There was no mortality, and morbidity was 1% (n = 2). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest North American report to date on robotic general surgical procedures. Our results show that robotic malfunction occurs in a minority of cases, with no adverse consequences. We believe that awareness of these failures and knowing how to troubleshoot are important to maintain the efficiency of these procedures.

A new classification of positive sestamibi and ultrasound scans in parathyroid localization.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) and sestamibi (MIBI) are traditionally considered positive or negative. The purpose of this study was to define and test a new scoring system for MIBI and US and to determine whether this can improve their accuracy for primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who had a single uptake on MIBI scans before bilateral neck exploration at a tertiary academic center between 2007 and 2008. These patients also had surgeon-performed neck US in the office, which was scored as "typical" or "atypical" based on how characteristic the image resembled a parathyroid gland. The MIBI uptake was scored by the nuclear medicine specialist as "weak," "moderate," or "strong" compared with the signal intensity of the thyroid. US and MIBI scoring was done preoperatively and their findings were compared with operative data. RESULTS: Of 200 patients, 71 % had a single adenoma, 12 % had double adenomas, and 17 % had four-gland hyperplasia. A weak, moderate, and strong signal on MIBI had an accuracy of 23, 47, and 72 %, respectively, in demonstrating single-gland disease. An atypical versus typical US appearance was accurate in 55 and 74 % of the time, in identifying single-gland disease. CONCLUSIONS: An appraisal of US and MIBI positivity in relation to image characteristics affects the reliability of both studies. This information should be kept in mind when selecting patients for focal neck exploration.

Utility of lung radiodensity ratios in diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body aspiration in children: a practical approach.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of radiodensity ratio between lungs on chest X-ray for the diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children. METHODS: X-rays of 33 patients with confirmed diagnosis of FBA by bronchoscopy were compared to 66 control patients. We divided the study group into three subgroups: symmetric (13-patients), right-oblique (RO;12-patients) and left-oblique (LO;8-patients). RESULTS: When we compared FBA-symmetric-subgroup to symmetric-control-group, FBA-RO-subgroup to RO-control-group and FBA-LO-subgroup to LO-control-group, radiodensity ratios were significantly higher in the FBA subgroups. CONCLUSION: The calculated radiodensity ratio between lungs on X-ray would be a useful and practical tool for the diagnosis of radiolucent FBA in children.

A new risk stratification algorithm for the management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

BACKGROUND: Although adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are detected in ≤5% of patients undergoing chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), their management is challenging. The current guidelines include recommendations from the National Institutes of Health, the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES), and the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE). The aim of this study was to develop a new risk stratification model and compare its performance against the existing guidelines for managing AI. METHODS: A risk stratification model was designed by assigning points for adrenal size (1, 2, or 3 points for tumors <4, 4-6, or >6 cm, respectively) and Hounsfield unit (HU) density on noncontrast CT (1, 2, or 3 points for HU <10, 10-20, or >20, respectively). This model was applied retrospectively to 157 patients with AI managed in an endocrine surgery clinic to assign a score to each tumor. The utility of this model versus the AAES/AACE guidelines was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients, 54 (34%), had tumors <4 cm with HU <10 (a score of 2). One third of these were hormonally active on biochemical workup and underwent adrenalectomy. The remaining two thirds were nonsecretory lesions and have been followed conservatively with annual testing. In 103 patients (66%), the adrenal mass was >4 cm and/or had indeterminate features on noncontrast CT (HU >10, irregular borders, heterogeneity), and adrenalectomy was performed after hormonal evaluation was completed (10 were hormonally active on biochemical testing). Seven of these patients (7%) had adrenocortical cancer on final pathology with tumor size <4 cm in 0, 4-6 cm in 1, and >6 cm in 5 patients. Of the hormonally inactive patients, 32% had a score of 3, 38% 4, and 30% 5 or 6. The incidence of adrenocortical cancer in these subgroups was 0, 0, and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that an algorithm that utilizes the hormonal activity at the first decision step followed by a consolidated risk stratification, based on tumor size and HU density, has a potential to spare a substantial number of patients from unnecessary "diagnostic" surgery for AI.