RESUMEN
Noninvasive functional assessment of systemic right ventricles (RV) in hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is challenging. This study aimed to compare pediatric cardiologists' current noninvasive imaging practices to those reported in 2013. A web-based survey was distributed to pediatric cardiologists via various listservs which queried timing of echocardiograms during HLHS palliative stages and measurements of RV function. Demographics of 156 participants who completed the 2023 survey were similar to survey participants in 2013 (n = 222). Respondents were mostly male (62%), echocardiographers (48%), in university-based practice (67%) in North America (95%). Echocardiograms were predominantly obtained monthly during interstage I (41%), every 6 months during interstage II (56%), and every year post-Fontan (68%), which is consistent from 2013. Routine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) significantly increased in interstage II (8.2%, 17%) and post-Fontan (24%, 56%) populations, respectively. Qualitative assessment (41%), ejection fraction (EF) by 3D (20%), fractional area change (16%), and RV strain/strain rate (13%) were preferred methods for systolic assessment, whereas a plurality of respondents (41%) did not believe RV diastolic measurements were valid. The largest gap between currently obtained and desired measurements existed for EF by 3D (46.5% points) and RV strain/strain rate (44.5% points). No differences existed between imagers compared to non-imagers. Variability in evaluating HLHS patients continues among pediatric cardiologists compared to 10 years ago. Qualitative assessment remains the primary RV systolic functional evaluation. Providers do not rely on quantitative RV diastolic function assessments in HLHS patients. Use of cMRI is increasing for RV functional analysis.
RESUMEN
NEONATE score > 17 has been proposed as a risk factor for interstage mortality/cardiac transplant (IM/T) for patients with single ventricle physiology. Hybrid procedure is assigned 6 points, the highest possible score for that surgical variable. Most centers reserve the hybrid procedure for high-risk patients. Goal of this study was to evaluate the NEONATE score at a center that routinely performs the hybrid procedure. Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing the hybrid procedure was performed (2008-2021). Demographics and variables used for the NEONATE score were collected. Maximization of Youden's J Statistic used to determine cohort-specific optimal threshold for patients undergoing comprehensive Stage II procedure (H-CSII) versus those with IM/T (H-IM/T). Total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria (H-CSII = 105, H-IM/T = 15). Gestational age was median 39 weeks (IQR 38, 39) and birth weight was 3.18 kg (2.91, 3.57). No patient was discharged with opiates or required post-operative extracorporeal circulatory support. Optimal threshold, as selected by maximizing Youden's J Statistic, was 22. Score > 22 had a positive predictive value of 0.33 (95% CI 0.12-0.62), negative predictive values of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.95), and accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.90) for IM/T. At a center that routinely performs the hybrid procedure, value of > 22 had the highest accuracy. This suggests that the hybrid procedure is not necessarily intrinsically a risk-factor for IM/T, but rather patient selection for the hybrid procedure may play a larger role at centers that do not routinely perform this procedure.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico , Procedimientos de Norwood , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico/cirugía , Procedimientos de Norwood/métodos , Peso al Nacer , Factores de Riesgo , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMEN
Robust epidemiological models relating wastewater to community disease prevalence are lacking. Assessments of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates have relied primarily on convenience sampling, which does not provide reliable estimates of community disease prevalence due to inherent biases. This study conducted serial stratified randomized samplings to estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 3717 participants, and obtained weekly samples of community wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in Jefferson County, KY (USA) from August 2020 to February 2021. Using an expanded Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model, the longitudinal estimates of the disease prevalence were obtained and compared with the wastewater concentrations using regression analysis. The model analysis revealed significant temporal differences in epidemic peaks. The results showed that in some areas, the average incidence rate, based on serological sampling, was 50 % higher than the health department rate, which was based on convenience sampling. The model-estimated average prevalence rates correlated well with the wastewater (correlation = 0.63, CI (0.31,0.83)). In the regression analysis, a one copy per ml-unit increase in weekly average wastewater concentration of SARS-CoV-2 corresponded to an average increase of 1-1.3 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection per 100,000 residents. The analysis indicates that wastewater may provide robust estimates of community spread of infection, in line with the modeled prevalence estimates obtained from stratified randomized sampling, and is therefore superior to publicly available health data.