Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients.

Although intracorporeal anastomosis has been demonstrated to be safe and effective after right colectomy, limited data are available about its efficacy after left colectomy for colon cancer located in splenic flexure. A multi-institutional audit was designed, including 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic left colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) compared with 89 matched patients who underwent a laparoscopic left colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, BMI, and ASA score between the two groups. Post-surgical history and stage of disease according to AJCC/UICC TNM were also similar. IA and EA groups demonstrated similar oncologic radicality in terms of the number of lymph nodes harvested (18.5 ± 9 vs. 17.5 ± 8.4; p = 0.48). Recovery after surgery was also better in patients who underwent IA, as confirmed by the shorter time to flatus in the IA group (2.6 ± 1.1 days vs. 3.4 ± 1.2 days; p < 0.001) and higher post-operative pain expressed in the mean VAS Scale in the EA group (1.7 ± 2.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.6; p < 0.001). Laparoscopic left colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of post-operative complications (OR 6.7, 95% CI 2.2-20; p = 0.001). However, when stratifying according to Clavien classification, the difference was consistently confirmed for less severe (class I and II) complications (OR 7.6, 95% CI 2.5-23, p = 0.001) but not for class III, IV, and V complications (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.1-16.9; p = 0.59). Our results were consistent to hypothesize that a complete laparoscopic approach could be considered a safe method to perform laparoscopic left colectomy with the advantage of a guaranteed faster recovery after surgery. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to obtain a more definitive conclusion.

Prevention of internal hernias and pelvic adhesions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: the role of fibrin sealant.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has increasingly become the standard of care for patients who undergo colorectal surgery for both benign and malignant diseases. This growing experience has also resulted in more reports of postoperative complications from the minimally invasive approach to primary colorectal resection. Small bowel obstruction from internal hernias and pre-sacral adhesions is an uncommon but not negligible complication. However, there is little literature specific to this topic with recommendations for different methods to prevent it. We report our original technique of closing the mesenteric defect and covering the pre-sacral fascia by using fibrin sealant to prevent this complication. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2014, a total of 1079 patients underwent elective laparoscopic left colorectal resection (left hemicolectomy or anterior rectal resection) in our department. In the first 298 procedures, the mesenteric defect was left open, while in the following 781 procedures, it was closed using fibrin sealant with the aim of preventing postoperative small bowel obstruction. RESULTS: Among the first 298 patients, three (1%) required reoperation for small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia (0.33%) or critical pre-sacral adhesions (0.66%). These complications did not occur in the subsequent series in which all 781 patients were treated with fibrin sealant prophylactic closure of the mesenteric defect. CONCLUSION: In our experience, fibrin sealant closure of the mesenteric defect has demonstrated to be safe and effective in preventing postoperative small bowel obstruction that remains a complication both in open and in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: our experience in 92 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is seldom used for gastric cancer because the complex vascularization and lymphatic drainage makes lymphadenectomy and esophagojejunal anastomosis difficult and requires special skills. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of LTG in gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-eight LTG and four laparoscopic remnant gastrectomies (LRGs) were performed over >12 years. The median patient age was 64 years, and the male/female ratio was 1.49/1. Eighty-seven patients had a D2 and only five patients had a D1 lymphadenectomy. We propose the retrospective analysis of intra- and perioperative mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: In only four of 96 cases approached by laparoscopy, a conversion to laparotomy was needed. There were two (2.17%) perioperative deaths in 92 procedures and few complications. Histological data show 79 advanced gastric cancers (AGC), 11 early gastric cancers (EGC), and two gastric diffused lymphomas. The five-year Kaplan-Meier overall survival in patients with EGC and AGC was 100% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the feasibility of an oncologically correct minimally invasive total gastrectomy. We would like to promote comparisons among different institutions to achieve better standardization of indications and techniques for a laparoscopic approach to gastric cancer.

Joint consensus on abdominal robotic surgery and anesthesia from a task force of the SIAARTI and SIC.

Minimally invasive surgical procedures have revolutionized the world of surgery in the past decades. While laparoscopy, the first minimally invasive surgical technique to be developed, is widely used and has been addressed by several guidelines and recommendations, the implementation of robotic-assisted surgery is still hindered by the lack of consensus documents that support healthcare professionals in the management of this novel surgical procedure. Here we summarize the available evidence and provide expert opinion aimed at improving the implementation and resolution of issues derived from robotic abdominal surgery procedures. A joint task force of Italian surgeons, anesthesiologists and clinical epidemiologists reviewed the available evidence on robotic abdominal surgery. Recommendations were graded according to the strength of evidence. Statements and recommendations are provided for general issues regarding robotic abdominal surgery, operating theatre organization, preoperative patient assessment and preparation, intraoperative management, and postoperative procedures and discharge. The consensus document provides evidence-based recommendations and expert statements aimed at improving the implementation and management of robotic abdominal surgery.

Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, new devices providing multiple channels have made the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy through a single access site not only feasible but much easier. The potential benefits of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy may include scarless surgery, reduced postoperative pain, reduced postoperative length of stay, and improved postoperative quality of life. There are no comparative data between LESS cholecystectomy and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) available at present with which to quantify these benefits. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, dual-institutional pilot trial comparing LESS cholecystectomy with standard LC. The primary end point was postoperative quality of life, measured as length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, cosmetic results, and SF-36 questionnaire scores. Secondary end points included operative time, conversion to standard LC, difficulty of exposure, difficulty of dissection, and complication rate. RESULTS: No significant differences in postoperative lengths of stay were found in the two groups. Postoperative pain evaluation using a visual analogue scale showed significantly better outcomes in the standard LC arm on the same day of surgery (P = .041). No differences in postoperative pain were found at the next visual analogue scale evaluation or in the postoperative administration of pain-relieving medications. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly higher in the LESS group at 1-month follow-up (mean, 94.5 ± 9.4% vs 86 ± 22.3%; median, 100% vs 90%; P = .025). Among the 8 scales of the SF-36 assessing patients' physical and mental health, scores on the Role Emotional scale were significantly better in the LESS group (mean, 80.05 ± 29.42 vs 68.33 ± 25.31; median, 100 vs 66.67; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, LESS cholecystectomy resulted in similar lengths of stay and improved cosmetic results and SF-36 Role Emotional scores but performed less well on pain immediately after surgery. A larger multicenter trial is needed to confirm and further investigate these results.