RESUMEN
This article focuses on bacterial infections that commonly affect geriatric patients. The elderly population is at a higher risk of contracting bacterial infections due to weakened immune systems and comorbidities. The article explores the cause, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and treatment options of these infections. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is a growing concern in the treatment of bacterial infections. The article highlights the importance of preventing these infections through proper hygiene and wound care. This article aims to provide an understanding of bacterial infections in geriatric patients and inform health-care providers on the most effective ways to manage and prevent these infections.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Anciano , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/microbiología , Piel , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Accurately determining and classifying different types of skin cancers is critical for early diagnosis. In this work, we propose a novel use of deep learning for classification of benign and malignant skin lesions using dermoscopy images. We obtained 770 de-identified dermoscopy images from the University of Missouri (MU) Healthcare. We created three unique image datasets that contained the original images and images obtained after applying a hair removal algorithm. We trained three popular deep learning models, namely, ResNet50, DenseNet121, and Inception-V3. We evaluated the accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for each model and dataset. DenseNet121 achieved the best accuracy (80.52%) and AUC ROC score (0.81) on the third dataset. For this dataset, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 and 0.81, respectively. We also present the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values for the predictions made by different models to understand their interpretability.