Impact of Intraoperative Allogeneic Platelet Transfusion on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Cardiac Surgery: Insights From a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant improvement in patient blood management, cardiac surgery remains a high hemorrhagic risk procedure. Platelet transfusion is used commonly to treat thrombocytopenia-associated perioperative bleeding. Allogeneic platelet transfusion may induce transfusion-related immunomodulation. However, its association with postoperative healthcare-associated infections is still a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of allogeneic platelet transfusion during cardiac surgery on postoperative healthcare-associated infection incidence. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative platelet transfusion was defined as exposure in a causal model. The primary outcome was the incidence of healthcare-associated infections comprised of bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and surgical-site infection. Among 7,662 included patients, 528 patients (6.8%) were exposed to intraoperative platelet transfusion, and 329 patients (4.3%) developed 454 postoperative infections. Bloodstream infection affected 106 patients (1.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia affected 174 patients (2.3%), and surgical-site infection affected 148 patients (1.9%). Intraoperative platelet transfusion was associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection after adjustment by multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.40-5.8; p = 0.004; n = 7,662), propensity score matching (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.57-12.0), p = 0.007; n = 766), and propensity score overlap weighting (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.51-6.1, p = 0.002; n = 7,762). Surgical-site infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia were not significantly associated with platelet transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that intraoperative allogeneic platelet transfusion is a risk factor for bloodstream infection after cardiac surgery. These results supported the development of patient blood management strategies aimed at minimizing perioperative platelet transfusion in cardiac surgery.

Minimally invasive redo tricuspid valve replacement in patient with persistent left superior vena cava.

INTRODUCTION: The management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still challenging in certain circumstances, especially for patients with anatomical variations. This challenge is even harder for reoperations, which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk. CASE REPORT: We describe a minimally invasive, beating-heart redo tricuspid valve replacement in a 71-years old woman with persistent left superior vena cava. DISCUSSION: Preoperative planning via CT-scan, teamwork and custom-made management of CPB are crucial for reoperations with anatomical variations. The perfusionist has a pivotal role in constructing and managing the CPB. CONCLUSION: We describe a strategy achieving the benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic and beating-heart surgery (avoidance of resternotomy risk and associated morbidity, right ventricular protection) in reoperative tricuspid surgery with persistent upper left vena cava.

Less invasive aortic valve replacement using the trifecta bioprosthesis.

Objectives. The safety and effectiveness of the Trifecta GT bioprosthesis (introduced in 2016) in less invasive aortic valve replacement are scarcely investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the immediate and initial follow-up results of this device in the context of less invasive surgery. We discuss patient-specific strategies for the selection of the surgical approach. Methods. A retrospective review of 133 patients undergoing AVR with the Trifecta GT through three less invasive accesses (UMS, Upper ministernotomy; RMS, Reversed ministernotomy; RAMT, Right anterior minithoracotomy) was performed. In-hospital, follow-up and hemodynamic performance (PPM, Patient-prosthesis mismatch) data were collected. Results. Among patients, 79% received UMS, 11% RMS and 10% RAMT. Selection of approach was based on preoperative anatomical analysis (CT-scan) and planned concomitant procedures. There was no operative mortality, no valve-related adverse events. There were 36 concomitant procedures. No significant intergroup differences occurred in cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamp, mechanical ventilation time, ICU stay and average bleeding. There were two cases of moderate PPM (1.5%) and no instances of severe PPM; there were no significant (≥2/4) perivalvular leaks. Average mean gradient at discharge was 8 ± 3 mmHg. At follow-up (average: 2.5 ± 0.9 years, 100% complete, 315 patient years) there was no mortality and no valve-related adverse event. Hemodynamic performance was maintained at follow-up. Conclusions. The optimal device for less invasive AVR needs to be individualized, as well as the selection of the surgical approach. The use of the Trifecta GT bioprosthesis appears to be reproductible whatever less invasive approach is employed, with confirmed excellent hemodynamic performance.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation induces early immune alterations.

BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides heart mechanical support in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock. Despite important progresses in the management of patients under VA-ECMO, acquired infections remain extremely frequent and increase mortality rate. Since immune dysfunctions have been described in both critically ill patients and after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, VA-ECMO initiation may be responsible for immune alterations that may expose patients to nosocomial infections (NI). Therefore, in this prospective study, we aimed to study immune alterations induced within the first days by VA-ECMO initiation. METHODS: We studied immune alterations induced by VA-ECMO initiation using cytometry analysis to characterize immune cell changes and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to explore plasma cytokine levels. To analyze specific changes induced by VA-ECMO initiation, nine patients under VA-ECMO (VA-ECMO patients) were compared to nine patients with cardiogenic shock (control patients). RESULTS: Baseline immune parameters were similar between the two groups. VA-ECMO was associated with a significant increase in circulating immature neutrophils with a significant decrease in C5a receptor expression. Furthermore, we found that VA-ECMO initiation was followed by lymphocyte dysfunction along with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) expansion. ELISA analysis revealed that VA-ECMO initiation was followed by an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α along with IL-10, a highly immunosuppressive cytokine. CONCLUSION: VA-ECMO is associated with early immune changes that may be responsible for innate and adaptive immune alterations that could confer an increased risk of infection.

Impact of age on outcomes of patients assisted by veno-arterial or veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: 403 patients between 2005 and 2015.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of age on early outcomes and mortality in veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation and veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation recipients, and to investigate predictors of mortality. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study on prospectively collected data including all patients treated by veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation and veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (January 2005-July 2015). Outcomes were compared among two subgroups: aged less than 65 years (Group 1) versus more than 65 years (Group 2) and by type of support (veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation or veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation). RESULTS: Among 403 patients, 20.3% were treated by veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation and 79.7% by veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation group: 76.6% were included in Group 1 and were more severe (pH 7.30 ± 0.19 vs. 7.35 ± 0.13 in Group 2, p = 0.003; lactates 7.5 ± 5.6 mmol/L vs. 5.8 ± 4.5 mmol/L in Group 2, p = 0.003). Weaning rate was higher in Group 1 (63.8% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.0043). The 30-day survival was higher in Group 1 (52.0% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis identified higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (p = 0.02) and noradrenaline (p = 0.04) to be associated with mortality. Veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation group: 80.5% were in Group 1. Mean PaO2 was 73.5 ± 42.9 mm Hg versus 100.8 ± 80.3 mm Hg (p = 0.24); FiO2 90.1% ± 18% versus 89.4% ± 16.4% (p = 0.89); and 30-day survival 56.1% versus 25.0% (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Patients older than 65 years have higher mortality after veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation or veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. This therapeutic strategy is feasible in the elderly, but comorbidities and clinical presentation have a major impact on prognosis and need to be seriously considered to avoid futile treatment.

Follow-Up of the Novel Free Margin Running Suture Technique for Mitral Valve Repair.

The free margin running suture (FMRS) is a novel technique for nonresection correction of degenerative mitral regurgitation. It was employed in 37 minimally invasive mitral repair cases. We performed a retrospective collection of in-hospital data and a clinical/echocardiographic follow-up. All patients were discharged with none or mild mitral regurgitation, except one who had mild-to-moderate (2+) regurgitation. At follow-up (average: 2.1 years), all patients were alive; there were no instances of recurrent regurgitation, one case of 2+ regurgitation, and no valve-related complications. Average mitral valve area, mean gradient, and coaptation length were 2.9 cm2 ±0.1, 3.5 mm Hg ±0.9, and 1.1 cm ±0.2.

Hemodynamic Results and Mid-term Follow-up of 850 19 to 23 mm Perimount Magna Ease Valves.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in small aortic roots remains a surgical dilemma with a higher risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). The Perimount Magna Ease aortic valve (PMEAV) represents an attractive device in such cases. We examined the early hemodynamic performance, the mid-term outcomes of the PMEAV, and the impact of PPM on outcome and functional class. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected in-hospital data, and a prospective single-center follow-up of 849 patients who received a 19 to 23 mm PMEAV (2008-2014). Concomitant mitral or tricuspid replacement was the exclusion criterion. Early hemodynamic features were prospectively collected; mid-term follow-up was conducted according to current guidelines. RESULTS: Size of implanted prosthesis was 19 mm in 11.5% of patients, 21 mm in 36.9%, and 23 mm in 51.5%. Operative mortality was 4.5% (3.1% for isolated AVR). The rate of severe and moderate PPMs was significantly higher in the 19 mm group. Follow-up was 99.9% complete (3.7 ± 2 years). Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 5 years was 99.1%. At stratified Kaplan-Meier's analysis, PPM and age <70 years were associated with SVD. PPM was not associated with worse functional status (New York Heart Association class) or mortality at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This series shows satisfactory clinical outcomes of the PMEAV implanted in small aortic annuli at mid-term follow-up. Although PPM may occur in smaller sizes, it has limited clinical impact, and it is not associated with mid-term mortality or worse functional class. Few SVD events are evidenced; nonetheless, limited follow-up duration and its methodology need to be considered.

Versatility of endoaortic balloon occlusion device for less invasive management of complex and reoperative cardiac cases.

Heart Teams are increasingly confronted with decision-making in anatomically and clinically complex surgical candidates. Herein, we discuss the versatility of the endoaortic occlusion device (Intraclude; Edwards Lifesciences Inc) for the management of a various array of complex primary and reoperative cardiac cases. Three clinical scenarios are illustrated (ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm, mitral valve surgery after previous CABG, extensive thoracic aortic surgery with continuous visceral perfusion), suggesting the effectiveness of the patient-specific strategy to minimize operative morbidity. Evolution of surgical techniques needs to be considered in decision-making among alternative treatment strategies.

Prognostic impact of blood product transfusion in VA and VV ECMO.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an accepted and reliable technique to provide temporary circulatory and/or respiratory support. Our objective was to describe the transfusion requirements in ECMO recipients. Secondarily, we addressed the effect of indications for ECMO on transfusion requirements and the baseline factors associated with worse survival. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 509 patients receiving venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) ECMO therapy (2005-2016). Follow-up was prospectively conducted. Data were prospectively entered in the Rennes ECMO database. RESULTS: VA ECMO was employed in 81% of cases; indications were post-cardiotomy myocardial failure in 28% of cases, post-heart transplantation (early graft failure) in 13.2% and cardiogenic shock in 149 (36.4%). VV ECMO was employed in the remaining patients. Average follow-up was 80.25 ± 85.13 days and was 100% complete. In the VA and VV groups, survival at the 30th post-implantation day was 58.3% and 71.1%, respectively, and survival at 6 months was 40.5% and 50.5%, respectively. Platelets and prothrombin time (PT) levels were significantly lower in the VA ECMO group at implantation (p<0.001). VA ECMO patients had a higher rate of thrombotic/haemorrhagic complications (p<0.001) and received both fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (60.5% vs. 31.8% p<0.001) and platelet units (Plt) (61.7% vs. 34.1% p<0.001) more frequently than VV ECMO patients. Post-cardiotomy and post-transplantation patients had significantly higher rates of transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBC), FFP and Plt than other VA ECMO cases (p<0.001, all). Mortality was equal or greater than 80% among patient subgroups who received more than 19 pRBC, 5 Plt and/or 12 FFP. CONCLUSIONS: An ECMO program is associated with important consumption of blood products. VA ECMO patients have a greater transfusion burden than VV ECMO patients. Mortality is greater in the case of extreme transfusion requirements.

Device-specific evaluation of intraventricular left ventricular assist device position by quantitative coaxiality analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific anatomy may influence the final intraventricular positioning of inflow cannula in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. An association exists between such positioning and clinical outcomes (specifically, orientation toward the interventricular septum has negative prognostic implications). Alternative commercially available LVADs are characterized by markedly different design, with potential consequences on intrathoracic fitting among individual patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 13 LVAD recipients (either HeartMate II-group A or Jarvik 2000 Flowmaker-group B) was evaluated. On postoperative computed tomography scans, we reconstructed the implanted LVAD (semiautomatic segmentation), defined the target mitral orifice (3D Slicer software), and built a coordinate system to quantify the coaxiality of the cannula with the mitral valve axis (angles φ and θ, expressed as percentage variation from the ideal value φ = Î¸ = 0°). RESULTS: Group A presented significantly greater average percentage variation of the φ angle (significantly greater orientation of the intraventricular cannula toward the interventricular septum; 33.2% ± 32.1% versus 1.9% ± 0.9%, P = 0.001). Group A presented significantly greater average percentage variation of the θ angle (52.7% ± 23.6% versus 14.5% ± 6.3%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The device assessed in group B showed in the present series better average coaxiality with the mitral orifice. Such finding is related with its design (total intraventricular placement) and interaction with thoracic structures. The present method is being integrated in the development of LVAD virtual implantation tools and may help physicians in patient-specific selection among alternative devices.

Virtual implantation of a novel LVAD: toward computer-assisted surgery for heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical and hemodynamic factors are among the determinants of patient-device interaction and early-term and long-term outcomes in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We are currently developing computer simulation tools aimed at (1) analyze the intrathoracic and intracavitary positioning of LVADs after implantation and establish correlation with clinical outcomes; (2) assist surgeons in the choice of device and of left ventricular coring site for optimized intrathoracic placement and function; and (3) facilitate the planning of less-invasive LVAD implantation. A virtual representation of LVAD (mesh device component) was created through cone-beam computed tomography and semiautomatic segmentation. A modular framework software (CamiTK, Grenoble, France) was used to create a three-dimensional representation of patients' computed tomography (CT) scan and incorporate the mesh device component for virtual implantation. RESULTS: Device reconstruction was included into a dedicated software with the purposes of virtual implantation, based on the preoperative CT scan of surgical candidates. CONCLUSIONS: We present herein the first digital reconstruction of the novel HeartMate 3 LVAD. Virtual implantation on the basis of preoperative CT scan is feasible within a user-friendly interactive software. Future studies will be focused on correlation with clinical variables.

Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation and bicuspid valve anatomy: an unsolved dilemma?

Interest is growing in the clinical use of sutureless (SU) valves. However, indications in some anatomical sub-settings, like bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), have been so far limited. We discuss herein our initial experience with the implantation of the 3f Enable SU bioprosthesis in patients with a BAV. Patients with a BAV were selected in our unit between March 2011 and September 2014 for a SU 3f Enable valve implantation. Twenty of the 198 patients who underwent a 3f Enable valve implantation in our unit had a BAV. Procedural success was 100 %, but reclamping was necessary in one (5 %) case. Median size of implanted bioprosthesis was 23 mm. After a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 10.7 months, survival was 100 %. Two patients (10 %) showed an immediate grade 1 paravalvular leak (PVL) that progressed to grade 2 and 3+ (moderate/severe), respectively, during follow-up. Type of bicuspidy (Sievers classification) in these two patients was 0 and intraoperatively aortic annuli admitted the 25 mm calibrator. Among the 18 patients without PVL, no one had a type 0 large BAV. At 1 year, implantation of the 3f Enable SU bioprosthesis appears to be safe in patients with BAV type I and II, while in type 0 use of the SU valve seems to be safe only if the annular diameter is <25 mm. Larger studies are necessary to confirm our findings in order to clarify the indications for SU technology in the subset of bicuspid patients.

Feasibility of Valve-in-Valve Procedure for Degenerated St. Jude Medical Trifecta Bioprosthesis.

The valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure is an option for patients with symptomatic structural degeneration of a bioprosthesis and excessive reoperative risk. The risk of coronary obstruction appears to be increased if ViV is performed for certain pericardial prostheses in which the leaflets are mounted outside the stent posts. Herein is described a successful ViV for a degenerated Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis, and the technical considerations for performing a ViV procedure within such types of prosthesis are considered. Emphasis is placed on the importance of preoperative investigations (computed tomography scan-based measurements of coronary ostial height and of sinus of Valsalva diameters), and on the precise deployment of the valve (transapical approach with transesophageal echocardiography control) to minimize the risk of major complications. The presence of a failing Trifecta bioprosthesis should not be considered an absolute contraindication to ViV on the basis of the risk of coronary obstruction.

Combined frozen elephant trunk and endovascular repair for extensive thoracic aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: We describe a 1-step treatment of extensive arch and descending aortic aneurysm by combination of frozen elephant trunk (FET) (hybrid endoprosthesis) and of conventional endoprosthesis deployment. METHODS: In a single-center, prospective, treatment-only study, the clinical data of 4 patients receiving combined FET and distal endoprosthesis deployment in the descending aorta were prospectively collected. Thoracic endoprostheses were deployed either retrogradely (off-pump from the femoral arterial access) or antegradely (from the aortic arch during hypothermic arrest). A distal-first approach was used ("trombone" mechanism). Spinal cord protection was achieved by transposition of the left subclavian artery to the left common carotid artery and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Preoperative computed tomography scan was performed to identify the collateral circulation. Preoperative planning was assisted by a sizing software (Endosize, Therenva Inc.). RESULTS: The aortic coverage was extended down to the orifice of the celiac trunk in one case and to the T8 level in the remainders. There was no operative mortality, 1 transient paraparesis, and 1 case of renal insufficiency. Follow-up results were satisfying (no device migration, no endoleak, no endotension, and no late neurologic complications). CONCLUSIONS: The present strategy may abolish the risks connected with the waiting time between the surgical first step and the later completion (aortic-related adverse events and drop-out) and deserves further investigations to determine its safety and feasibility profile.

Sutureless 3F Enable Valve Replacement for Pure Aortic Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We present our experience in the use of the sutureless valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation. METHODS: Out of 167 patients who underwent sutureless aortic valve implantation with a Medtronic 3f Enable prosthesis in our unit between March 2011 and February 2014, 12 (7.1%) received a sutureless valve for pure aortic regurgitation. RESULTS: Mean age, logistic EuroSCORE, and left ventricular ejection fraction were 72 ± 5 years, 6.3 ± 2.9%, and 52.5 ± 15.3%, respectively. The sutureless valve could be successfully implanted in all cases; nine patients had a full sternotomy (associated coronary artery bypass graft in four cases and associated mitral surgery in five), one patient had a ministernotomy, and two had a thoracoscopic approach. Average cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 90 ± 30 and 127 ± 51 minutes, respectively. At the outpatient echocardiography, average mean gradient was 10.54 ± 4.99 mmHg and a grade I-II paravalvular leakage (PVL) was detected in the first patient of the cohort (ministernotomy approach). At a mean follow-up of 11.1 ± 5.5 months, average mean gradient was 9.75 ± 2.87 mmHg, no new PVL was detected, and the known PVL was stable. No pacemaker implantation was required. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the 3f Enable sutureless valve is technically possible with pure aortic regurgitation in selected patients. Multicenter investigations are necessary to assess the mid-term benefits of such a device in this subset of patients.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnancy.

AIM: Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may pose specific challenges in pregnant women, including the need for prone decubitus ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We present our experience with ECMO during pregnancy and review the literature on this topic. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review using the MEDLINE-NIH database. Papers describing single cases or clinical series of pregnant women treated with veno-venous ECMO for ARDS were retrieved; the clinical features and maternal and infant outcomes were presented in aggregate form. RESULTS: We describe the case of a 32-year-old primigravida who received ECMO starting at the 28th gestation week due to A/H1N1 influenza-related ARDS. This strategy allowed saving both mother and child; normal recovery without sequelae was evident at one year. The systematic review included 29 reported cases of ECMO employment during pregnancy; A/H1N1 influenza was the etiology of ARDS in 79% of cases. Maternal and infant mortality may reach 28%, while the rate of complications during ECMO support reaches 57%. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO is a viable treatment for severe ARDS during pregnancy, after failure of other therapeutic strategies; the risk of spontaneous gynecological bleeding is limited. Issues remain about the timing of ECMO implantation and the management of gestation. Close fetal assessment and multidisciplinary discussion are pivotal for decision-making.

Feasibility of sutureless valve implantation in reoperation for degenerated 19 mm aortic valvular bioprostheses.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a promising option to treat degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses, and may involve Valve-in-Valve (ViV) procedures. Unfortunately, the ViV technique may provide an inadequate relief of stenosis in small-diameter degenerated bioprostheses, especially in the 19 mm valve subgroup. The study aim was to determine the feasibility and reliability of reoperating 19 mm degenerated bioprostheses, using a minimally invasive sutureless valve implantation. METHODS: Between March and December 2012, three reoperative procedures for degenerated 19 mm conventional aortic bioprostheses were performed at the authors' unit. Stenosis was the main modality of structural deterioration. A partial upper ministernotomy approach was used, whereby part of the sewing ring of the previous bioprosthesis was left in place and a 19 mm Medtronic Enable sutureless valve was implanted in all cases. RESULTS: The average valve implantation time was 10.3 min. There were no cases of operative mortality or major morbidity. One permanent pacemaker was required. At discharge, transthoracic echocardiography showed no paravalvular leakages; the average transvalvular gradient was 16 mmHg. The one-year follow up showed no paravalvular leakages and unchanged gradients. CONCLUSION: The use of a surgical sutureless valve after explanting a 19 mm degenerated bioprosthesis is feasible and effective for relieving stenosis However, larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Video-assisted minithoracotomy approach: technical developments towards totally endoscopic sutureless aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Interest in sutureless aortic bioprostheses is growing because of the potential advantages that such devices can bring in facilitating minimally invasive approaches. Video assistance can potentially enhance details of decalcification and sutureless valve sizing. We review the feasibility of sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) via a minimally invasive video-assisted (MIVA) right anterior minithoracotomy. METHODS: Between November 2012 and November 2013, 21 patients were selected to undergo an AVR using the Enable sutureless device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) via a video-assisted right second space minithoracotomy. RESULTS: Procedural success of the MIVA approach was 95.3% (one conversion to median sternotomy due to severe pleural adhesions). Average aortic clamp time was 72.1 ± 22.1 min. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7% (one patient, pulmonary embolism). CONCLUSIONS: The described approach appears to be safe and feasible with adequate clamp times. Video assistance allows optimal visualization of the aortic root and accurate valve delivery, without conflict between the device, the camera, and the instruments, making this setting an encouraging baseline towards the assessment of the totally endoscopic approach.

Computer-Assisted Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation for Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve is an alternative to high-risk reoperation on a failing bioprosthesis. It entails specific challenges such as left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. We propose a patient-specific augmented imaging based on preoperative planning to assist the procedure. Valve-in-valve simulation was performed to represent the optimal level of implantation and the neo-left ventricular outflow tract. These data were combined with intraoperative images through a real-time 3D/2D registration tool. All data were collected retrospectively on one case (pre and per-procedure imaging). We present for the first time an intraoperative guidance tool in transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve procedure.