Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. METHODS: Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).

Health Care Use and Its Associated Factors 5-8 Years after Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To describe health care use and its associated factors in the chronic phase after stroke. METHODS: Patients completed a questionnaire on health care use, 5-8 years after hospital admission for stroke. It comprised the number of visits to physicians or other health care professionals over the past 6 months (Physician-visits; Low ≤1 or High ≥2) and other health care professionals (Low = 0 or High ≥ 1). In addition the Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS), Frenchay Activity Index (FAI) and Physical and Mental Component Summary Scales of the Short Form 12 (PCS and MCS) were administered. Their associations with health care use (high, low) were determined by means of logistic regression analysis, adjusted for sex and age. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 145 patients (54%) returned the questionnaires; mean time-since-stroke was 80.3 months (SD10.2), age-at-stroke 61.7 years (SD13.8), and 46 (59%) were male. Physician contacts concerned mainly the general practitioner (58; 79.5%). Forty-one (52.6%) and 37 (47.4%) of the patients had a high use of physician and other health professionals visits, respectively. Worse PCS scores were associated with both high use of physician and other health professionals visits (OR .931; 95%CI .877-.987 and OR .941; 95%CI .891-.993, respectively), whereas the FAI, MCS, or LUNS were not related to health care use. CONCLUSIONS: Health care use after stroke is substantial and is related to physical aspects of health status, not to mental aspects, activities or unmet needs, suggesting a mismatch between patients' needs and care delivered.

The Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity in a Dutch Population.

BACKGROUND: Unmet needs are common after stroke. We aimed to translate the 22-item Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) Questionnaire and validate it in a Dutch stroke population. METHODS: The LUNS was translated and cross-culturally adapted according to international guidelines. After field testing, the Dutch version was administered twice to a hospital-based cohort 5-8 years after stroke. Participants were also asked to complete the Frenchay Activity Index (FAI) and Short Form (SF)-12. To explore acceptability, the response and completion rates as well as number of missing items were computed. For concurrent validity, the differences in health status (FAI, SF-12) between groups who did and did not report an unmet need were calculated per item. To determine the 14-day test-retest reliability, the percentage of agreement between the first and the second administration was calculated for each item. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 145 patients (53.8%) returned the initial Dutch LUNS (average age 68.3 [standard deviation 14.0] years, 59.0% male); 66 of these patients (84.6%) fully completed it. Of all items, 3.3% were missing. Among completers, the median number of unmet needs was 3.5 (2.0-5.0; 1.0-14.0). For 15 of 22 items, there was a significant association with the FAI or SF-12 Mental or Physical Component Summary scales. The percentage of agreement ranged from 69.8% to 98.1% per item. CONCLUSIONS: Among the 53.8% who completed the survey, the LUNS was concluded to be feasible, reliable, and valid; two-thirds of its items were related to activities and quality of life. Its usefulness and acceptability when administered in routine practice require further study.

Validity of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in Patients With Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with stroke (N=51; mean age, 60±11y; 16 women [31%]). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were asked to complete the MHQ (57 items) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Additional assessments included the Barthel Index and performance tests for hand function (Action Research Arm Test, Nine Hole Peg Test, Frenchay Arm Test, Motricity Index). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between the MHQ and other outcome measures were determined using Spearman correlation coefficients and the internal consistency of the MHQ using Cronbach α. Floor or ceiling effects were present if >15% of the patients scored minimal or maximal scores, respectively. Test-retest reliability was established by the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean MHQ total score was 70.0±22.4, with Cronbach α being .97. The MHQ total score correlated significantly with the physical component summary of the SF-36, the Barthel Index, and all hand function performance tests (P<.01). The MHQ total score showed no floor or ceiling effects. The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was .97. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that the MHQ is an internally consistent, valid, and reliable hand function questionnaire in outpatients after stroke, although these results need to be further confirmed.

The psychometric properties of the PROMIS® profile CAT in people with stroke.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) Profile Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) consists of seven CATs and one single item measuring most relevant aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of our study was to determine construct validity and floor and ceiling effects of the PROMIS Profile CAT in Dutch people with stroke. METHODS: People with stroke receiving rehabilitation completed the PROMIS Profile CAT and the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ5D). Construct validity was evaluated with hypotheses testing based on expected correlations between the profile domains and the domains of the EQ5D. The proportion of participants with the lowest and highest scores were calculated for each profile domain to assess floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: 160 participants were included (median age 61 years, 41.9% female). For the PROMIS Profile domains Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity > 75% of the results met our hypotheses. For Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities only 60% of hypotheses were met. No floor or ceiling effects were found, with the exception of a floor effect for Pain Intensity which probably indicates that many participants had no pain. CONCLUSION: Most domains of the PROMIS Profile CAT showed sufficient construct validity and no problematic floor or ceiling effects in people with stroke. These CATs and the single item Pain Intensity can be used to efficiently measure HRQoL in people with stroke.

The trajectory of pain and pain intensity in the upper extremity after stroke over time: a prospective study in a rehabilitation population.

PURPOSE: To assess the presence of upper extremity pain after stroke over time and the course of its intensity in patients with persistent pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stroke completed a question on the presence of upper extremity pain (yes/no) and rated its intensity with a visual analogue scale (0-10) at 3, 18, and 30 months after starting multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The presence of upper extremity pain and its intensity over time were analysed with Generalized Estimating Equations models and Linear Mixed Models, respectively. RESULTS: 678 patients were included. The proportions of patients reporting upper extremity pain were 41.8, 36.0, and 32.7% at 3, 18, and 30 months, respectively, with the decline in proportions reaching statistical significance (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92, p < 0.001). At all time points, in those reporting pain the median intensity was 5.0 (interquartile ranges (IQR) 4.0-7.0 at 3 and 3.0-6.0 at 18 and 30 months). In the 73 patients with persistent pain, there was no significant change in intensity over time. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients reporting upper extremity pain after stroke was considerable, despite a significant decrease in 2.5 years. In patients reporting persistent pain, the intensity did not change over time.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAbout one-third of patients with stroke reported upper extremity pain at 30 months after starting rehabilitation.In patients with stroke who reported persistent upper extremity pain, there was no significant change in pain intensity over time.There is room for improvement of diagnosis and treatment of upper extremity pain in patients with stroke.

Stroke survivors' long-term participation in paid employment.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge on long-term participation is scarce for patients with paid employment at the time of stroke. OBJECTIVE: Describe the characteristics and the course of participation (paid employment and overall participation) in patients who did and did not remain in paid employment. METHODS: Patients with paid employment at the time of stroke completed questions on work up to 30 months after starting rehabilitation, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P, Frequency, Restrictions and Satisfaction scales) up to 24 months. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without paid employment at 30 months were compared using Fisher's Exact Tests and Mann-Whitney U Tests. USER-P scores over time were analysed using Linear Mixed Models. RESULTS: Of the 170 included patients (median age 54.2 interquartile range 11.2 years; 40% women) 50.6% reported paid employment at 30 months. Those returning to work reported at baseline more working hours, better quality of life and communication, were more often self-employed and in an office job. The USER-P scores did not change statistically significantly over time. CONCLUSION: About half of the stroke patients remained in paid employment. Optimizing interventions for returning to work and achieving meaningful participation outside of employment seem desirable.

Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in Clinical Research in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Literature Review.

Objective: To systematically describe the use and outcomes of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures in clinical studies in populations with stroke. Data Sources: A systematic search on the use of PROMIS measures in clinical stroke studies in 9 electronic databases. Study Selection: Studies had to be original, reporting on outcome data using PROMIS measures in populations with stroke (ischemic and/or hemorrhagic), from January 1st, 2007. Initially, 174 unique studies met the inclusion criteria. In 2 steps, titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened for eligibility (2 authors independently). Data Extraction: From the selected articles, study characteristics, type of PROMIS measures, and its outcomes were extracted by 2 authors independently. The authors discussed their views to achieve consensus. A third author was consulted if necessary. Data Synthesis: In total, 27 studies (24,366 patients) were included, predominantly from the United States (22); most study populations were hospital-based (20); the number of patients ranged from 30-3283. In general, patients had no or mild symptoms (median modified Rankin scale 1). Two different generic PROMIS measures were reported (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS 29) and 9 PROMIS measures focusing on specific domains (sleep, pain, physical functioning, self-efficacy, satisfaction with social roles, depression, anxiety, cognition, fatigue). These match the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains mentioned in the Core Set for Stroke. The measures were administered 1-55 months after stroke. Outcome data are provided. Pooling of data was not achieved because of a large variety in study characteristics (inclusion criteria, follow-up moments, data processing). Conclusions: The PROMIS measures in this review could be relevant from a patient's perspective, covering ICF core set domains for patients with stroke. The large variety in study characteristics hampers comparisons across populations. Many different outcome measures are used to report results of stroke rehabilitation studies.

What works and why in the implementation of eRehabilitation after stroke - a process evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of an eRehabilitation intervention named Fit After Stroke @Home (Fast@home) - including cognitive/physical exercise applications, activity-tracking, psycho-education - after stroke resulted in health-related improvements. This study investigated what worked and why in the implementation. METHODS: Implementation activities (information provision, integration of Fast@home, instruction and motivation) were performed for 14 months and evaluated, using the Medical Research Council framework for process evaluations which consists of three evaluation domains (implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors). Implementation activities were evaluated by field notes/surveys/user data, it's mechanisms of impact by surveys and contextual factors by field notes/interviews among 11 professionals. Surveys were conducted among 51 professionals and 73 patients. User data (n = 165 patients) were extracted from the eRehabilitation applications. RESULTS: Implementation activities were executed as planned. Of the professionals trained to deliver the intervention (33 of 51), 25 (75.8%) delivered it. Of the 165 patients, 82 (49.7%) were registered for Fast@home, with 54 patient (65.8%) using it. Mechanisms of impact showed that professionals and patients were equally satisfied with implementation activities (median score 7.0 [IQR 6.0-7.75] versus 7.0 [6.0-7.5]), but patients were more satisfied with the intervention (8.0 [IQR 7.0-8.0] versus 5.5 [4.0-7.0]). Guidance by professionals was seen as most impactful for implementation by patients and support of clinical champions and time given for training by professionals. Professionals rated the integration of Fast@home as insufficient. Contextual factors (financial cutbacks and technical setbacks) hampered the implementation. CONCLUSION: Main improvements of the implementation of eRehabilitation are related to professionals' perceptions of the intervention, integration of eRehabilitation and contextual factors.Implication for rehabilitationTo increase the use of eRehabilitation by patients, patients should be supported by their healthcare professional in their first time use and during the rehabilitation process.To increase the use of eRehabilitation by healthcare professionals, healthcare professionals should be (1) supported by a clinical champion and (2) provided with sufficient time for learning to work and getting familiar with the eRehabilitation program.Integration of eRehabilitation in conventional stroke rehabilitation (optimal blended care) is an important challenge and a prerequisite for the implementation of eRehabilitation in the clinical setting.

The course of depressive symptoms in the first 12 months post-stroke and its association with unmet needs.

AIM: To describe the course of depressive symptoms during the first 12 months post-stroke and its association with unmet needs. METHODS: A prospective cohort study among stroke patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Depressive symptoms were assessed 3, 6, and 12 months post-stroke using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and categorized into three trajectories: no (all times <8), non-consistent (one or two times ≥8), or persistent (all times ≥8) depressive symptoms. Unmet needs were assessed using the Longer-Term Unmet Needs questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between depressive symptoms and unmet needs. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients were included, of whom 95 (62.9%), 38 (25.2%), and 18 (11.9%) had no, non-consistent, or persistent depressive symptoms, respectively. Depressive symptoms three months post-stroke persisted in 43.9% and recurred in 19.5% of patients during the first 12 months post-stroke. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with the occurrence and number of unmet needs (odds ratio 6.49; p = 0.003 and odds ratio 1.28; p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms three months post-stroke were likely to persist or recur during the first 12 months post-stroke. Depressive symptoms are associated with unmet needs. These results suggest that routine monitoring of depressive symptoms and unmet needs should be considered post-stroke.Implications for rehabilitationPatients with depressive symptoms three months post-stroke have a high risk of developing persistent or recurrent depressive symptoms during the first 12 months post-stroke.Unmet needs are associated with both non-consistent and persistent depressive symptoms post-stroke.These results suggest that health professionals should routinely screen for depressive symptoms and health care needs around three months post-stroke.In patients with depressive symptoms at three months post-stroke early treatment of depressive symptoms and addressing unmet needs should be considered and depressive symptoms should be routinely monitored during the first 12 months post-stroke.

Societal burden of stroke rehabilitation: Costs and health outcomes after admission to stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate societal costs and changes in health-related quality of life in stroke patients, up to one year after start of medical specialist rehabilitation. DESIGN: Observational. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who received medical specialist rehabilitation in the Stroke Cohort Outcomes of REhabilitation (SCORE) study. METHODS: Participants completed questionnaires on health-related quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D-3L), absenteeism, out-of-pocket costs and healthcare use at start and end of rehabilitation and 6 and 12 months after start. Clinical characteristics and rehabilitation costs were extracted from the medical and financial records, respectively. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2016 a total of 313 stroke patients completed the study. Mean age was 59 (standard deviation (SD) 12) years, 185 (59%) were male, and 244 (78%) inpatients. Mean costs for inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation were US$70,601 and US$27,473, respectively. For inpatients, utility (an expression of quality of life) increased significantly between baseline and 6 months (EQ-5D-3L 0.66-0.73, p = 0.01; visual analogue scale 0.77-0.82, p < 0.001) and between baseline and 12 months (visual analogue scale 0.77-0.81, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-year societal costs from after the start of rehabilitation in stroke patients were considerable. Future research should also include costs prior to rehabilitation. For inpatients, health-related quality of life, expressed in terms of utility, improved significantly over time.

Caregiver burden after stroke: changes over time?

Introduction and aim: Many caregivers of stroke patients experience a high burden. This study aims to describe the course of burden in individual caregivers in the first year after stroke.Methods: This study is part of the Stroke Cohort Outcomes of REhabilitation study, a multicentre, longitudinal cohort study including consecutive stroke patients admitted to two rehabilitation facilities. Caregivers were asked to complete the Caregiver Strain Index and questions on their sociodemographic characteristics 6 and 12 months post admission. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from medical records.Results: A total of 129 caregivers were included, 72 completed the Caregiver Strain Index twice. Of them, 19 (26.4%) were men, median age 59 (range 27-78) years. A consistently high or low burden was reported by 15 (20.8%) and 49 (68.1%), respectively, whereas 8 (11.1%) reported a high burden at either 6 (n = 3) or 12 months (n = 5).Discussion: In the majority of caregivers of stroke patients the perceived caregiver burden is consistent over time. However, as in 11.1% caregiver burden changes from 6 to 12 months, caregiver burden should be measured repeatedly until 12 months after stroke. Caregivers living together with a patient who suffered a haemorrhagic stroke seem to be more at risk for a high burden.Implications for rehabilitationMany caregivers of stroke patients experience a high burden.The Caregiver Strain Index score at 6 months is a good predictor for the score at 12 months.In some caregivers the high burden is not yet present at 6 months, therefore monitoring caregiver burden throughout the first year after stroke seems warranted.Caregivers living together with a patient who suffered a haemorrhagic stroke seem to be more at risk for a high burden.

Factors associated with willingness to use eRehabilitation after stroke: A cross-sectional study among patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increasing availability of eRehabilitation, its use remains limited. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with willingness to use eRehabilitation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SUBJECTS: Stroke patients, informal caregivers, health-care professionals. METHODS: The survey included personal characteristics, willingness to use eRehabilitation (yes/no) and barri-ers/facilitators influencing this willingness (4-point scale). Barriers/facilitators were merged into factors. The association between these factors and willingness to use eRehabilitation was assessed using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 125 patients, 43 informal caregivers and 105 healthcare professionals participated in the study. Willingness to use eRehabilitation was positively influenced by perceived patient benefits (e.g. reduced travel time, increased motivation, better outcomes), among patients (odds ratio (OR) 2.68; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.34-5.33), informal caregivers (OR 8.98; 95% CI 1.70-47.33) and healthcare professionals (OR 6.25; 95% CI 1.17-10.48). Insufficient knowledge decreased willingness to use eRehabilitation among pa-tients (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.74). Limitations of the study include low response rates and possible response bias. CONCLUSION: Differences were found between patients/informal caregivers and healthcare professionals. Ho-wever, for both groups, perceived benefits of the use of eRehabilitation facilitated willingness to use eRehabili-tation. Further research is needed to determine the benefits of such programs, and inform all users about the potential benefits, and how to use eRehabilitation.

Patients' outcome expectations and their fulfilment in multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Patients' expectations of the outcomes of rehabilitation may influence the outcomes and satisfaction with treatment. OBJECTIVES: For stroke patients in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, we aimed to explore patients' outcome expectations and their fulfilment as well as determinants. METHODS: The Stroke Cohort Outcomes of REhabilitation (SCORE) study included consecutive stroke patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility after hospitalisation. Outcome expectations were assessed at the start of rehabilitation (admission) by using the three-item Expectancy scale (sum score range 3-27) of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). After rehabilitation, patients answered the same questions formulated in the past tense to assess fulfilment of expectations. Baseline patient characteristics were recorded and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) was measured at baseline and after rehabilitation. The number of patients with expectations unfulfilled or fulfilled or exceeded was computed by subtracting the admission and discharge CEQ Expectancy scores. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with outcome expectations and their fulfilment, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 165 patients (96 males [58.2%], mean (SD) age 60.2 years [12.7]) who completed the CEQ Expectancy instrument at admission (median score 21.6, interquartile range [IQR] 17.0-24.0); 79 completed it both at admission (median score 20.6, IQR 16.6-24.4) and follow-up (median score 20.0, IQR 16.4-22.8). For 40 (50.6%) patients, expectations of therapy were fulfilled or exceeded. No patient characteristic at admission was associated with baseline CEQ Expectancy score. Odds of expectation fulfilment were associated with low expectations at admission (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.83) and improved EQ-5D score (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In half of the stroke patients in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, expectations were fulfilled or exceeded, most likely in patients with low expectations at admission and with improved health-related quality of life. More research into the role of health professionals regarding the measurement, shaping and management of outcome expectations is needed.

Comorbidity, limitations in activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to contribute to the knowledge of the influence of comorbidity in OA. The objectives of the study were (i) to describe the prevalence of comorbidity and (ii) to describe the relationship between comorbidity (morbidity count, severity and the presence of specific diseases) and limitations in activities and pain in elderly patients with knee or hip OA using a comprehensive inventory of comorbidity. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted, in which 288 elderly patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis were included. Apart from demographic and clinical data, information about comorbidity, limitations in activities (WOMAC, SF-36 and timed walking test) and pain (VAS) was collected by questionnaires and tests. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, multivariate regression techniques, t-tests and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Almost all patients suffered from at least one comorbid disease, with cardiac diseases, diseases of eye, ear, nose, throat and larynx, other urogenital diseases and endocrine/metabolic diseases being most prevalent. Morbidity count and severity index were associated with more limitations in activities and with more pain. The presence of most of the moderate or severe diseases and obesity was associated with limitations in activities or with pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study emphasize the importance of comorbidity in the rehabilitation of elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Clinical practitioners should be aware of the relationship of comorbidity with functional problems in OA patients.

Patient reported outcomes of hand function three years after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively describe hand function and associated factors among stroke survivors by means of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ; 6 domains; score 0-100, worst-best). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, stroke patients were invited to complete a set of questionnaires on hand function, socio-demographic characteristics, mental functioning, daily activities, quality of life, and caregiver strain. Stroke characteristics were collected retrospectively from medical records. Multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and duration of follow-up was used to identify factors associated with MHQ score. RESULTS: 207 out of 576 eligible patients responded (36%); mean age 63.8 years (SD14.2), 125 males (60.4%). Mean time since stroke was 36.3 months (SD9.9). In 85% of the patients, the MHQ Total score was less than 100 points (median 79.9, IQR 63.0-95.8). The median scores of the domains were: overall hand function 75.0, daily activities 90.5, work 85.0, pain 100, appearance 93.8, and satisfaction with hand function 83.3. A lower MHQ Total score was significantly associated with a lower Barthel Index at hospital discharge, a lower level of education, a supratentorial stroke and with unfavorable outcomes regarding physical and mental functioning, quality of life, and caregiver strain. CONCLUSION: Patients can perceive limitations on several domains with respect to hand function 2-5 years after stroke. Problems related to the appearance of the hand and satisfaction with hand function can be relevant and should be considered accordingly. Persistent hand problems after stroke are related to a more severe, supratentorial stroke in lower educated patients.

Poststroke Depression: A Long-Term Problem for Stroke Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to ascertain the prevalence of depressive mood and its determinants in the chronic phase after stroke. DESIGN: Five hundred seventy-six consecutive patients were invited to participate 2 to 5 yrs after hospitalization for a first-ever stroke. Stroke characteristics at hospitalization were collected retrospectively from medical records. Patients and their caregivers completed questionnaires on depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare usage, daily activities, quality of life, and caregiver strain. Patients with HADS depression scores of less than 8 were compared with patients with HADS depression scores of 8 or higher by means of univariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age, sex, and Barthel Index at discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients (36%) returned the questionnaires. After a mean follow-up of 36.3 mos, 67 patients (34%) had a HADS depression score of 8 or higher. Male sex and being born abroad was statistically significantly associated with a high HADS depression score, adjusted for age, sex and stroke severity (where appropriate). Depressed patients had higher anxiety levels, a more avoidant coping style, less daily activities, and a lower quality of life; their caregivers experienced a higher burden. CONCLUSIONS: In the chronic phase after stroke, a considerable proportion of patients has depressive symptoms. This seems to be related to sex, country of origin, anxiety, coping style, daily activities, quality of life, and caregivers' strain. Future research should focus on causal relationships and opportunities for treatment.

What is Important in E-health Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation? A Survey Study among Patients, Informal Caregivers and Health Professionals.

Incorporating user requirements in the design of e-rehabilitation interventions facilitates their implementation. However, insight into requirements for e-rehabilitation after stroke is lacking. This study investigated which user requirements for stroke e-rehabilitation are important to stroke patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals. The methodology consisted of a survey study amongst stroke patients, informal caregivers, and health professionals (physicians, physical therapists and occupational therapists). The survey consisted of statements about requirements regarding accessibility, usability and content of a comprehensive stroke e-health intervention (4-point Likert scale, 1=unimportant/4=important). The mean with standard deviation was the metric used to determine the importance of requirements. Patients (N=125), informal caregivers (N=43), and health professionals (N=105) completed the survey. The mean score of user requirements regarding accessibility, usability and content for stroke e-rehabilitation was 3.1 for patients, 3.4 for informal caregivers and 3.4 for health professionals. Data showed that a large number of user requirements are important and should be incorporated into the design of stroke e-rehabilitation to facilitate their implementation.

Practice variation in the structure of stroke rehabilitation in four rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To describe practice variation in the structure of stroke rehabilitation in 4 specialized multidisciplinary rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands. DESIGN AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert group formulated a set of 23 elements concerning the structure of inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitation, categorized into 4 domains: admission-related (n = 7), treatment-related (n = 10), client involvement-related (n = 2), and facilities-related (n = 4). In a cross-sectional study in 4 rehabilitation centres data on the presence and content of these elements were abstracted from treatment programmes and protocols. In a structured expert meeting consensus was reached on the presence of practice variation per element. RESULTS: Practice variation was observed in 22 of the 23 structure elements. The element "strategies for patient involvement" appeared similar in all rehabilitation centres, whereas differences were found in the elements regarding admission, exclusion and discharge criteria, patient subgroups, care pathways, team meetings, clinical assessments, maximum time to admission, aftercare and return to work modules, health professionals, treatment facilities, and care-giver involvement. CONCLUSION: Practice variation was found in a wide range of aspects of the structure of stroke rehabilitation.

Isometric shoulder muscle activation patterns for 3-D planar forces: a methodology for musculo-skeletal model validation.

OBJECTIVE: To present an isometric method for validation of a shoulder model simulation by means of experimentally obtained electromyography and addressing all muscles active around the shoulder joints. BACKGROUND: Analysis of muscle force distribution in the shoulder by means of electromyography during motion tasks is hampered by artificial and non-linear amplitude modulation and is often limited to downward directed external forces. This application of EMG is therefore inadequate and insufficient for the validation of shoulder model simulations. We suggest an isometric method including multi-directional forces to overcome these problems. METHODS: A force with constant magnitude is actively rotated stepwise in 20 directions perpendicular around the arm while kept in one position. The isometric muscle activation (EMG) is a function of the clockwise-rotated force angle, characterized by baseline activation, and a section of increased muscle activation characterized by baseline interception and direction and magnitude of maximum muscle activation. Comparison of the parameterized muscle activation with predicted muscle forces from model simulation illustrates the applicability for musculo-skeletal model validation. RESULTS: All recorded shoulder muscles were active over a section of force angles of at least 180 degrees. Some muscles demonstrated two activation sections. The estimated model sensitivity for the baseline interception was SD=5 degrees -10 degrees. The Principal Action was the most reliable parameter (SD=4 degrees ). A correlation of 0.778 was observed between model simulations and EMG recordings. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology addresses all shoulder muscles over a substantial section of planar force directions. This enables the comparison of experimentally determined direction of activation on- and offset and direction of maximum activation with equivalent muscle forces, predicted from model simulation.