Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690606

RESUMEN

AIMS: Corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for many inflammatory diseases but often lead to adverse effects, including hyperglycaemia. This study investigated the mechanisms driving differential effects on glucose control for AZD9567, an oral nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator vs. prednisolone in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way cross-over study (NCT04556760), participants received either AZD9567 72 mg and prednisolone 40 mg daily (cohort 1); AZD9567 40 mg and prednisolone 20 mg daily (cohort 2); or placebo and prednisolone 5 mg daily (cohort 3). Treatment duration was 3 days with a 3-week washout between treatment periods. Glycaemic control was assessed after a standardized meal and with continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: A significant difference between AZD9567 and prednisolone in favour of AZD9567 was observed for the change from baseline to Day 4 glucose excursions postmeal in cohort 1 (glucose area under the curve from 0 to 4 h -4.54%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.88, -0.01; P = .049), but not in cohort 2 (-5.77%; 95% CI: -20.92, 12.29; P = .435). In cohort 1, significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone were also seen for the change from baseline to day 4 in insulin and glucagon secretion postmeal (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively) and change from baseline to Day 4 in GLP-1 response (P = .022). Significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone for 24-h glucose control were observed for both cohort 1 (-1.507 mmol/L; 95% CI: -2.0820, -0.9314; P < .001) and cohort 2 (-1.110 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.7257, -0.4941; P < .001). CONCLUSION: AZD9567 significantly reduced treatment-induced hyperglycaemia compared with prednisolone.

2.
Eur Respir J ; 59(4)2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503985

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) belongs to a new class of bronchodilator, the single-molecule muscarinic antagonist and ß-agonist, developed for the treatment of COPD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of navafenterol versus placebo and an active comparator treatment for moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: This phase 2a, randomised, multicentre (Germany and UK), double-blind, double-dummy, three-way complete crossover study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03645434) compared 2 weeks' treatment of once-daily navafenterol 600 µg via inhalation with placebo and a fixed-dose combination bronchodilator (umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI); 62.5 µg/25 µg) in participants with moderate-to-severe COPD. The primary outcome was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 15. Secondary end-points included change from baseline in peak FEV1; change from baseline in Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS); change from baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT); adverse events; and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: 73 participants were randomised. After 14 days, trough FEV1 was significantly improved with navafenterol compared with placebo (least-squares (LS) mean difference 0.202 L; p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in FEV1 between navafenterol and UMEC/VI (LS mean difference -0.046 L; p=0.075). COPD symptoms (CAT and BCSS) showed significantly greater improvements with both active treatments versus placebo (all p<0.005). Novel objective monitoring (VitaloJAK) showed that cough was reduced with both active treatments compared with placebo. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment groups and no serious adverse events were reported in the navafenterol treatment period. CONCLUSION: Once-daily navafenterol was well tolerated, improved lung function and reduced COPD-related symptoms, similar to an established once-daily fixed-dose combination bronchodilator.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Clorobencenos , Tos/inducido químicamente , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 24(11): 2222-2231, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35791627

RESUMEN

AIMS: Exposure to corticosteroids is known to increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. We estimated the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in selected patient groups exposed to systemic corticosteroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, using real-world data from UK primary care, patients were selected who had at least one episode of exposure to oral or intravenous corticosteroids for any indication. Corticosteroid-exposed patients were matched with non-exposed patients. Relative dosage was estimated as a weight-based, prednisolone-equivalent dose. Crude rates of progression to type 2 diabetes were determined for patient groups defined by relevant steroid-related and phenotypic characteristics present at corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: Overall, rates of incidence of type 2 diabetes were 12.5 and 6.7 events per thousand person-years' (pkpy) exposure, respectively, in those who received at least one dose of corticosteroids versus those never exposed. This represented a rate ratio of 1.85 (95% CI 1.74-1.97). The incidence of type 2 diabetes was found to be associated with several of the selected characteristics, both individually and multi-dimensionally. The highest rate of incident type 2 diabetes was observed in very severely obese men aged 46-55 years having had the longest corticosteroid exposure and highest corticosteroid dose (190 incident events pkpy exposure). CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid exposure increased the risk of incident type 2 diabetes, and there was evidence of both a dose-response and a duration response. The impact of corticosteroid exposure upon the rate of incident type 2 diabetes appeared, however, to involve a complex, multi-dimensional interaction between the selected characteristics, some of which might be impacted by reverse causality.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Prednisolona/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 102, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist ß2-agonist (MABA) molecule in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single doses of navafenterol were investigated in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: This was a randomized, five-way complete cross-over study. Patients received single doses of navafenterol 400 µg, navafenterol 1800 µg and placebo (all double-blind) and indacaterol 150 µg and tiotropium 18 µg (both open-label active comparators). The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 2. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized and 28 (73.7%) completed the study. Navafenterol 400 µg and 1800 µg demonstrated statistically significant improvements vs placebo in change from baseline in trough FEV1 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.111 [0.059, 0.163] L and 0.210 [0.156, 0.264] L, respectively, both P < .0001). The changes were significantly greater with navafenterol 1800 µg vs the active comparators (least squares mean treatment difference: 0.065-0.069 L, both P < .05). The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for placebo and the active comparators (range 34.4-37.5%), slightly higher for navafenterol 400 µg (52.9%), and lowest for navafenterol 1800 µg (22.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of navafenterol demonstrated sustained bronchodilation over 24 h. Navafenterol was well tolerated and no safety concerns were raised. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT02573155 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov . Registered 9th October, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Broncoconstricción/efectos de los fármacos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Inglaterra , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética , Capacidad Vital
5.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 212, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a novel, long-acting, dual-pharmacology (muscarinic receptor antagonist and ß2-adrenoceptor agonist) molecule in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. METHODS: These two phase I, randomised, single-blind, multiple-ascending-dose studies evaluated inhaled navafenterol and placebo (3:1 ratio) in healthy, male, non-Japanese (study A; NCT02814656) and Japanese (study B; NCT03159442) volunteers. In each study, volunteers were dosed in three cohorts, allowing gradual dose escalation from 300 µg to 600 µg to 900 µg. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of navafenterol at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four volunteers completed each study (navafenterol, n = 6; placebo, n = 2 in each cohort). There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation of navafenterol. The most frequent TEAEs were vessel puncture-site bruise (placebo, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg; n = 3) in study A and diarrhoea (placebo, n = 1; navafenterol 300 µg, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg, n = 3) in study B. No dose-response relationship was observed for TEAEs. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean heart rate on day 16 in both studies. The pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar between non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple ascending doses of navafenterol were well-tolerated and the safety and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar in non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. The findings support navafenterol clinical development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; Nos.: NCT02814656 and NCT03159442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Japón/etnología , Londres , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Método Simple Ciego , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética
6.
Respir Res ; 21(Suppl 1): 211, 2020 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is an inhaled long-acting dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist/ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) in development for the treatment of obstructive airways diseases. The safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were investigated in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: This was a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two cohorts which evaluated escalating doses of navafenterol (50-2100 µg) in an alternating manner over three treatment periods. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the change from pre-dose baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) for each treatment period. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were randomised; 15 completed treatment. Data from all 16 patients were analysed. The maximum tolerated dose was not identified, and all doses of navafenterol were well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were headache (n = 10, 62.5%) and nasopharyngitis (n = 7, 43.8%). No TEAEs were serious, fatal, or led to discontinuation, and no dose dependency was identified. Navafenterol demonstrated a dose-ordered bronchodilatory response with a rapid onset of action (within 5 min post-dose). Doses ≥200 µg resulted in improvements in trough FEV1 (mean change from baseline range 0.186-0.463 L) with sustained bronchodilation for 24-36 h. Plasma concentrations increased in a dose-proportional manner, peaking ~ 1 h post-dose, with a derived terminal elimination half-life of 15.96-23.10 h. CONCLUSIONS: In this study navafenterol was generally well tolerated with a rapid onset of action which was sustained over 36 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02573155.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncoconstricción/efectos de los fármacos , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Inglaterra , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Recuperación de la Función , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/farmacocinética
7.
BMC Pulm Med ; 16(1): 102, 2016 07 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abediterol is a novel, once-daily long-acting ß2-agonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma in combination with an anti-inflammatory agent. This Phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, crossover study investigated the bronchodilation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of abediterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: Seventy patients (aged ≥40 years, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage II/III) were randomised (1:1:1:1:1:1) to single doses of abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 or 10 µg, indacaterol 150 µg or placebo. Spirometry was performed up to 36 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in a subset of patients (N = 20). Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: Abediterol (all doses) significantly improved change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) compared with placebo (0.102, 0.203, 0.233 and 0.259 L for abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 and 10 µg, respectively; all p < 0.0001; primary endpoint). Abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg significantly improved trough FEV1 compared with indacaterol 150 µg (0.092, 0.122 and 0.148 L, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Improvements in bronchodilation were maintained at all time points post-dose versus placebo (all abediterol doses) and from 15 or 30 min post-dose versus indacaterol 150 µg with abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg (all p < 0.05). Abediterol had low systemic exposure; incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: All doses of abediterol (0.625-10 µg) provided clinically and statistically significant, dose-dependent improvements in bronchodilation versus placebo, and abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg gave significant improvements versus indacaterol. All doses of abediterol were safe and well tolerated in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425814 . Registered 29 August 2011.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Alemania , Humanos , Indanos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinolonas/farmacocinética , Espirometría , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 176, 2014 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398689

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-acting ß2-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) are recommended in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for asthma management. Abediterol is a novel, selective, potent, once-daily LABA in development for treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to determine abediterol doses with similar peak bronchodilatory effect to salbutamol 400 µg, and duration of action compatible with once-daily dosing in patients with persistent, stable asthma. METHODS: This was a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01425801) in 62 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were also receiving an ICS. Patients received single doses of abediterol 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, or 2.5 µg, salbutamol 400 µg, or placebo in the morning. Spirometry was performed up to 36 h post-dose; safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional endpoints included trough FEV1, normalized area under the FEV1 curve (FEV1 AUC) up to 24 h post-dose, and peak and trough forced vital capacity (FVC). RESULTS: Abediterol produced dose-dependent improvements in peak FEV1 from baseline compared with placebo, from 0.274 (95% CI 0.221, 0.327) to 0.405 L (95% CI 0.353, 0.458) for abediterol 0.313 to 2.5 µg, respectively (p < 0.0001 all doses). Abediterol 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 µg had similar magnitude of peak FEV1 effect to salbutamol. Dose-dependent changes from baseline in trough FEV1 versus placebo were 0.219 (95% CI 0.136, 0.302) to 0.400 L (95% CI 0.317, 0.483) for abediterol 0.313 to 2.5 µg, respectively (p < 0.0001). All abediterol doses achieved significant improvements versus placebo in FEV1 AUC 0-6, 0-12, and 0-24 h, and peak and trough FVC (p < 0.05). Less than 10% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events for each dose of abediterol; most were mild to moderate in intensity and the most common were headache and nasopharyngitis. There were no clinically relevant changes in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Abediterol 0.625-2.5 µg provided dose-dependent, clinically and statistically significant bronchodilation versus placebo in patients with asthma, with a peak effect similar to salbutamol and duration of action compatible with once-daily dosing. All doses of abediterol were well tolerated.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Quinolonas/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Capacidad Vital
10.
Clin Transl Sci ; 16(12): 2494-2506, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37873558

RESUMEN

Oral corticosteroid use is limited by side effects, some caused by off-target actions on the mineralocorticoid receptor that disrupt electrolyte balance. AZD9567 is a selective, nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor modulator. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZD9567 and prednisolone were assessed in a phase IIa study. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of action was also evaluated in vitro in monocytes from healthy donors. In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomized 1:1 to AZD9567 40 mg or prednisolone 20 mg once daily orally for 14 days. The primary end point was change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at day 15. Secondary end points included components of DAS28-CRP, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), and safety end points, including serum electrolytes. Overall, 21 patients were randomized to AZD9567 (n = 11) or prednisolone (n = 10), and all completed the study. As anticipated, AZD9567 had a similar efficacy profile to prednisolone, with no clinically meaningful (i.e., >1.0) difference in change from baseline to day 15 in DAS28-CRP between AZD9567 and prednisolone (least-squares mean difference: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: -0.49 to 1.43). Similar results were observed for the secondary efficacy end points. In vitro transcriptomic analysis showed that anti-inflammatory responses were similar for AZD9567, prednisolone, and dexamethasone. Unlike prednisolone, AZD9567 had no effect on the serum sodium:potassium ratio. The safety profile was not different from that of prednisolone. Larger studies of longer duration are required to determine whether AZD9567 40 mg may in the future be an alternative to prednisolone in patients with inflammatory disease.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Prednisolona/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA