Change in Pain and Quality of Life Among Women Enrolled in a Trial Examining the Use of Narrow Band Imaging During Laparoscopic Surgery for Suspected Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the addition of narrow band imaging (NBI) to traditional white light imaging during laparoscopic surgery impacts pain and quality of life (QOL) at 3 and 6 months after surgery among women with suspected endometriosis and/or infertility. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification level I). SETTING: The trial was conducted in 2 medical centers. PATIENTS: From October 2011 to November 2013, 167 patients undergoing laparoscopic examination for suspected endometriosis and/or infertility were recruited. The analytic study sample includes 148 patients with pain and QOL outcome data. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive white light imaging followed by NBI (WL/NBI) or white light imaging only (WL/WL). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-up time points. Average and most severe pain at each time point were assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale. QOL was measured using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30. Baseline characteristics were similar for the study groups. The WL/NBI and WL/WL groups had similar reductions in pain at 3 and 6 months. In addition, QOL improved similarly for both the WL/NBI and WL/WL groups at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for suspected endometriosis is associated with a reduction in pain and an improvement in QOL. The differences in pain reduction and QOL improvement, which are noted at 3 months and remain stable at 6 months after surgery, are similar for those undergoing surgery with WL/NBI compared with those undergoing surgery under traditional white light conditions.

Sensitivity of Narrow Band Imaging Compared With White Light Imaging for the Detection of Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of narrow band imaging (NBI) in conjunction with standard white light imaging to improve the detection and diagnosis of endometriosis during laparoscopic evaluation compared with white light imaging alone. Sensitivity of NBI in detecting endometriosis was assessed and compared with white light imaging. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. CLASSIFICATION OF STUDY DESIGN: LEVEL I: Evidence obtained from a properly designed, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: The trial was conducted in 2 medical centers. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-seven women undergoing laparoscopic evaluation for suspected endometriosis and/or infertility were recruited. Of these, 150 were assessable to determine sensitivity of NBI compared with white light imaging for the detection of endometriotic lesions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive white light imaging followed by NBI or white light imaging only. The pelvis was systematically visualized with each assigned imaging modality; lesions were recorded under each visualization and then resected. All patients had white light imaging on the first visualization followed by either a second white light examination (control arm) or NBI examination (intervention arm). MEASUREMENTS: Pathology of resected lesions was the criterion standard for evaluating sensitivity and was conducted at each institution. The method of detection of the lesion (white light or NBI) was masked. Central pathology review was conducted for a randomly selected 10% sample of specimens and for those lesions visualized under only 1 imaging modality among patients assigned to the intervention arm. The sensitivity was assessed for each modality (white light and NBI) and compared using a McNemar's test. MAIN RESULTS: Among the group randomized to receive both white light and NBI, 4 patients had lesions detected with NBI but no lesions detected with white light. Among the 255 lesions confirmed as endometriosis by pathologic review, all were detected by NBI for a sensitivity of 100%; 79% were detected by white light imaging (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The addition of NBI to white light imaging increased the number of endometriotic lesions identified during laparoscopy and the diagnosis of endometriosis compared with the use of white light imaging alone.

The use of narrowband imaging for identification of endometriosis.

A pilot study was designed to evaluate whether a narrowband imaging (NBI) endoscopic light source could detect endometriosis implants that were not identifiable with a visible light spectrum laparoscope. In all, 21 consecutive patients who were undergoing pelviscopy for pelvic pain and possible endometriosis were enrolled in the study. Endoscopic evaluation was performed using an endoscope that was fitted with a NBI light source using 415- and 540-nm filters. Endometriosis was first documented and photographed using visible light and then re-evaluated with NBI. Implants newly found with NBI were documented and photographed. All noted lesions were excised using a harmonic scalpel. In all, 21 consecutive patients (age range 20-40 years) were enrolled in the study with a preoperative diagnosis of pelvic pain and possible pelvic endometriosis. One patient was excluded after evaluation with NBI did not provide additional biopsy specimens. Fourteen of the 20 patients had lesions identified with NBI that were not identified with visible light. A total of 38 biopsy specimens were taken using NBI; 20 (53%) of them were identified histologically as endometriosis. Seven patients did not have endometriosis identified with white light; however, 4 of these patients had lesions identified with NBI that were confirmed endometriosis. This pilot study is a promising start in the process to evaluate NBI endoscopy as an effective tool for evaluating and identifying endometriosis implants that are not visible with white light endoscopy.