A comparison of FibroMeter™ NAFLD Score, NAFLD fibrosis score, and transient elastography as noninvasive diagnostic tools for hepatic fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive markers that purport to distinguish patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with fibrosis from those without must be evaluated rigorously for their classification accuracy. Herein, we seek to compare the diagnostic performances of three different noninvasive methods (FibroMeter™ NAFLD score, NAFLD Fibrosis score (NFSA), and Transient Elastrography [TE]) for the detection of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were included. The Kleiner system was used for grading fibrosis in liver biopsies. The FibroMeter™ NAFLD score was determined using a proprietary algorithm (regression score). The NFSA score was calculated based on age, hyperglycemia, body mass index, platelets, albumin and serum aminotransferase levels. TE was performed using the Fibroscan apparatus. RESULTS: The sensitivities/specificities for the FibroMeter™ NAFLD score, NFSA, and TE for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2 + F3 + F4 fibrosis) were 38.6%/86.4%, 52.3%/88.6%, and 75.0%/93.2%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of TE were significantly higher than those of both the FibroMeter™ NAFLD score and NFSA. No significant differences were found between the FibroMeter™ NAFLD score and NFSA for the detection of significant and severe fibrosis, although the diagnostic performance of the FibroMeter™ NAFLD score was higher than that of the NFSA score for cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, TE showed the best diagnostic performance for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. The diagnostic performances of the FibroMeter™ NAFLD score and NFSA did not differ significantly for the detection of both significant and severe fibrosis.

Evaluation of depression, anxiety and quality of life in hepatitis C patients who treated with direct acting antiviral agents.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is known to impair the quality of life (QoL). Increased levels of anxiety and depression have been found in HCV infection with a prevalence of 28% and 33%, respectively. Our aim was to investigate depression, anxiety, and QoL of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients before and after treatment with a direct-acting antiviral agent (DAAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, enrolled CHC patients who had undergone DAAA treatment in our out-patient clinic. We administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire to measure the severity of the anxiety and depression symptoms and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire to measure the QoL at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Pretreatment anxiety and depression scores showed a statistically significant difference from the post treatment scores (p=0.000 and p=0.029 respectively). When we compared the SF-36 subitems before and after the treatment, a statistical significance was found in physical functioning (p=0.026), physical role limitation (p=0.009), bodily pain (p=0.011), general health (p=0.017), social functioning (p=0.006), and emotional role limitation (p=0.007). Also, an improvement was seen in the vitality (p=0.488) and mental health (p=0.714), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Depression got minimally worse in the male group despite an improvement in CHC. Anxiety scores were improved with treatment in the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups significantly. A decrease in anticipatory anxiety may be related to the high treatment success with DAAA. Nearly all the subitems of the QoL scores were improved after treatment and these were more common in the female group. Elimination of HCV may itself decrease the number of patients who need psychiatric treatment.