RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this review is to address the barriers limiting access to diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) in Brazil, specifically for patients in the public healthcare system, arguably those with the least access to innovation. DESIGN: A selected panel of Brazilian experts in SLE/LN were provided with a series of relevant questions to address in a multi-day conference. During the conference, responses were discussed and edited by the entire group through numerous drafts and rounds of discussion until a consensus was achieved. RESULTS: The authors propose specific and realistic recommendations for implementing access to innovative diagnostic tools and treatment alternatives for SLE/LN in Brazil. Moreover, in creating these recommendations, the authors strived to address barriers and impediments for technology adoption. The multidisciplinary care required for SLE/LN necessitates the collective participation of all involved stakeholders. CONCLUSION: A great need exists to expand the adoption of innovative diagnostic tools and treatments for SLE/LN not only in Brazil but also in most countries, as access issues remain an urgent demand. The recommendations presented in this article can serve as a strategy for new technology adoption in other countries in a similar situation.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nefritis Lúpica , Brasil , Consenso , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Nefritis Lúpica/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: Availability of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has improved clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, but it also increased the cost of treatment. Biosimilars, the regulated copies of biologic products, have a potential to reduce health care costs and expand access to treatment. However, because of a complex development process, biosimilars can be considered only those noninnovator biologics with satisfactory supporting evidence (ranging from structural to clinical), as outlined in the recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO). In Latin America, a heterogeneous regulatory landscape and nonconsistent approval practices for biosimilars create decision-making challenges for practicing rheumatologists. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE: Most Latin American countries either have adopted or are in the process of adopting guidelines for the approval of biosimilars. However, among several marketed bDMARDs in the region, currently there are only 2 products that could be considered true biosimilars, based on the WHO criteria. The rest can be considered only intended copies, whose safety and efficacy are not fully established. One such product had to be withdrawn from the market because of safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Practicing rheumatologists in Latin America need to understand the regulatory situation for biosimilars in their countries. When considering bDMARDs that are not innovator products, clinicians should use only those that have been approved according to the WHO recommendations. For clarification, local health authorities or professional associations should be contacted.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatología , Humanos , América LatinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) are at increased risk of contracting severe infections and suffering complications, particularly when they are receiving immunomodulating therapy. Vaccination is an important means to prevent many potential infections and thereby reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with AIRD. The purpose of this consensus document is to provide health care professionals with recommendations for the vaccination of AIRD patients who reside in Latin America. The recommendations were developed by an expert committee from the region based on a review of the literature and their clinical experience. METHODS: The Americas Health Foundation (AHF) used PubMed and EMBASE to identify clinicians and scientists with an academic or hospital affiliation and who had published in the field of adult vaccination and rheumatic diseases since 2010. As a result of this effort, AHF convened an 8-member panel of clinical and scientific experts from Latin America. Both the AHF and panel members conducted a careful literature review to identify relevant publications in the areas of adult vaccination and rheumatology, and the sum of the articles identified was provided to the entire panel. Prior to the conference, panelists were each asked to prepare a written response to a salient issue on the subject, identified by AHF. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: During the conference, each response was edited by the entire group, through numerous drafts and rounds of discussion until a complete consensus on vaccination recommendations for adult patients with AIRDs was obtained, including 7 key recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Vacunación , Adulto , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacología , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Reumatología/métodos , Reumatología/organización & administración , Reumatología/tendencias , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis can involve several domains. Due to its multifaceted nature and its frequent comorbidities such as depression, obesity, osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, it is difficult to monitor these patients because the clinical scores involve subjective data. High-resolution ultrasound probes allowed the evaluation of more superficial structures, such as the nails and their synovio-entheseal framework, in close relationship with the enthesis of the distal extensor digitorum tendon. Nail ultrasound studies vary in terms of the parameters and fingers studied and in their findings. OBJECTIVES: To describe the most significant sonographic nail changes and the most affected fingers in psoriatic arthritis and to verify the association of nail ultrasound findings with clinical scores (nail psoriasis severity index (NAPSI), ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), minimal disease activity (MDA), disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA)). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with 52 patients with psoriatic arthritis at the Hospital de Clínicas do Paraná and 50 controls. A total of 1016 nails were analyzed (517 from patients with psoriatic arthritis and 499 from controls). Ultrasonography of the nails of the 10 fingers was performed to assess the trilaminar appearance, measure the distance from the nail bed, identify synovitis of the distal interphalangeal joints and the presence of a power Doppler signal from the nail matrix/nail bed. The captured images were independently evaluated by a rheumatologist with expertise in musculoskeletal ultrasound. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.28.0.0 software, and the association of nail plate changes, nail bed distance and power Doppler signal with the NAPSI, DAPSA, MDA and ASDAS-PCR were calculated. Spearman correlation coefficients were estimated to analyze the correlations between pairs of quantitative variables. Student's t test and the MannâWhitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between patients and controls. The nonparametric MannâWhitney U and KruskalâWallis tests were used to compare groups according to the MDA or DAPSA classification. RESULTS: The Doppler signal of the nail matrix and nail bed was more frequently identified in patients (44.2%) than in controls (6%), and the difference in the mean power Doppler signal between the two groups was significant (p < 0.001). Changes in the nail plate were more common in the right thumb (44.2%), left thumb (36.5%) and second finger on the right hand (32.7%). The number of fingers with nail plate changes, enthesitis, paratendinitis, grayscale synovitis and DIP involvement in the distal interphalangeal joints was higher among patients with psoriatic arthritis (p < 0.001). There were found some correlations between US findings and clinical scores: ultrasound nail involvement and the NAPSI score (p = 0.034), the number of fingers and mean change in the nail plate and the ASDAS-CRP (p = 0.030). DAPSA (remission/low activity versus moderate/high activity) was associated to the mean change in the nail plate (p < 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Nail ultrasound has the potential to assist in the capturing of the actual disease activity status in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Uñas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico por imagen , Uñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Enfermedades de la Uña/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
Hereditary connective tissue disorders include more than 200 conditions affecting different organs and tissues, compromising the biological role of the extracellular matrix through interference in the synthesis, development, or secretion of collagen and/or its associated proteins. The clinical phenotype includes multiple signs and symptoms, usually nonspecific but of interest to rheumatologists because of musculoskeletal involvement. The patient´s journey to diagnosis is long, and physicians should include these disorders in their differential diagnoses of diseases with systemic involvement. In this review, insights for the diagnosis and treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta, hypermobility spectrum disorder/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan, Loeys-Dietz, and Stickler syndromes are presented.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo , Humanos , Artritis , Colágeno/genética , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/genética , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/terapia , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/genética , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/genética , Síndrome de Loeys-Dietz/genética , Síndrome de Loeys-Dietz/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Marfan/genética , Síndrome de Marfan/diagnóstico , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/genética , Desprendimiento de RetinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions primarily affecting the axial skeleton, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, each with distinct features. This study aimed to investigate imaging disparities, focusing on sacroiliac magnetic resonance and spine radiography, across phenotypes and between males and females in axial SpA. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess clinical data, laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores of sacroiliac joints using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS), and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs utilizing the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The study aimed to compare these parameters between two groups: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, radiographic and non-radiographic) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), as well as between males and females. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, with 62 patients in the axSpA group and 32 patients in the axPsA group. There were no differences in disease activity, mobility, radiographic damage in the spine (Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score- mSASSS), or sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index - SPARCC and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score - SSS) between the two phenotypes. Regarding sex, in imaging exams, men had higher mSASSS (p = 0.008), SSS (p = 0.001), and fat metaplasia (MG) score based on SSS (p = 0.001), while women had significantly higher SPARCC scores (p = 0.039). In the male group, the presence of HLA-B27 allele had an impact on more structural lesions on MRI (SSS), p = 0.013. CONCLUSION: In this study, imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial SpA did not show differences in phenotypes but did reveal differences based on sex, which may have an impact on future diagnostic recommendations. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Fenotipo , Articulación Sacroiliaca , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Articulación Sacroiliaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación Sacroiliaca/patología , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Factores Sexuales , Espondiloartritis Axial/diagnóstico por imagen , Sacroileítis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars offer significant advantages for improving access to biologic treatments in Latin America. However, their uptake has been slow due to misconceptions, regulatory uncertainties, and inadequate pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE: To address these issues, Americas Health Foundation convened a multidisciplinary panel of regional experts in biosimilar use and interchangeability from Latin America. The panel assessed the current landscape and recommended steps to enhance access. RESULTS: Key recommendations include strengthening biosimilar regulations, ensuring transparent enforcement, implementing robust pharmacovigilance, and promoting collaboration among stakeholders to educate about the safety, efficacy, and economic advantages of biosimilars and their interchangeability. CONCLUSIONS: By embracing biosimilars and interchangeability, Latin American countries can expand patient access, foster competition, diversify treatment sources, and enhance the sustainability of their healthcare systems. However, achieving these goals requires addressing knowledge gaps and biases among healthcare providers, patients, regulators, and government agencies. This can be accomplished through clear communication and the use of real-world evidence.
Biosimilars offer an opportunity to expand access to crucial biologic treatments in Latin America by providing lower-cost alternatives when patents expire. However, adopting biosimilars has been slow due to misconceptions and regulatory uncertainties. To address this, experts recommend considering approved biosimilars as interchangeable with reference products, allowing for switching without compromising safety or efficacy, with the limitation of switching only once per year. To improve access, well-defined regulations, enforcement, and transparency from regulatory agencies are necessary, along with education for healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders to address knowledge gaps and negative perceptions. Improved pharmacovigilance systems and collaboration between stakeholders can help communicate the benefits of biosimilars and interchangeability. By embracing biosimilars, Latin American countries can expand patient access, foster market competition, diversify treatment options, and improve the sustainability of healthcare systems.
RESUMEN
Amyloidosis is a localized or systemic disease caused by deposition of proteins in the extracellular space of various organs and tissues. As part of the disease, proteins that were originally soluble misfold and acquire a fibrillar conformation that renders them insoluble and resistant to proteolysis. Systemic amyloidosis is a rare, often underdiagnosed condition. In recent years, the incidence of newly diagnosed cases of amyloidosis has been increasing in association with the aging of the population and greater access to diagnostic tests. From a clinical perspective, systemic amyloidosis is frequently associated with involvement of the kidneys (causing nephrotic syndrome), heart (cardiac failure and arrhythmia), and peripheral nervous system (sensorimotor polyneuropathy and autonomic dysfunction). This condition is important to the rheumatologist for several reasons, such as its systemic involvement that mimics autoimmune rheumatic diseases, its musculoskeletal manifestations, which when recognized can allow the diagnosis of amyloidosis, and also because reactive or secondary AA amyloidosis is a complication of rheumatic inflammatory diseases. The treatment of amyloidosis depends on the type of amyloid protein involved. Early recognition of this rare disease is fundamental for improved clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Síndrome Nefrótico/etiología , Reumatólogos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Proteína Amiloide A SéricaRESUMEN
Although the terms "rare diseases" (RD) and "orphan diseases" (OD) are often used interchangeably, specific nuances in definitions should be noted to avoid misconception. RD are characterized by a low prevalence within the population, whereas OD are those inadequately recognized or even neglected by the medical community and drug companies. Despite their rarity, as our ability on discovering novel clinical phenotypes and improving diagnostic tools expand, RD will continue posing a real challenge for rheumatologists. Over the last decade, there has been a growing interest on elucidating mechanisms of rare autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases, allowing a better understanding of the role played by immune dysregulation on granulomatous, histiocytic, and hypereosinophilic disorders, just to name a few. This initiative enabled the rise of innovative targeted therapies for rheumatic RD. In this review, we explore the state-of-the art of rare RD and the critical role played by rheumatologists in healthcare. We also describe the challenges rheumatologists may face in the coming decades.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Raras , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Enfermedades Raras/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatólogos , ReumatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop new composite disease activity indices for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Data from routine clinic visits at multiple centres were collected in a systematic manner. Data included all domains identified as important in randomised controlled trials in PsA. Decisions to change treatment were used as surrogates for high disease activity. New indices were developed by multiple linear regression (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score: PASDAS) and empirically, utilising physician-defined cut-offs for disease activity (arithmetic mean of desirability functions: AMDF). These were compared with existing composite measures: Composite Psoriatic arthritis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Disease Activity for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Disease Activity Score for rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28). RESULTS: 161/503 (32%) subjects had treatment changes. Although all measures performed well, compared with existing indices, PASDAS was better able to discriminate between high and low disease activity (area under receiver operating curves (ROC)) curve with 95% CI: PASDAS 0.773 (0.723, 0.822); AMDF 0.730 (0.680, 0.780); CPDAI 0.719 (0.668, 0.770); DAPSA 0.710 (0.654, 0.766); DAS28 0.736 (0.680, 0.792). All measures were able to discriminate between disease activity states in patients with oligoarthritis, although area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) were generally smaller. In patients with severe skin disease (psoriasis area and severity index>10) both nonparametric and AUC curve statistics were nonsignificant for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Two new composite measures to assess disease activity in PsA have been developed. Further testing in other datasets, including comparison with existing measures, is required to validate these instruments.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROCRESUMEN
The objective of the study was to investigate the association between IL-8 and other biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (MCP-1, V-CAM, I-CAM) and the disease activity scores in a sample of 54 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) without use of biological agents. Fifty-four AS patients without treatment with anti-TNFs agents between 18 and 80 years old, who met modified New York criteria and at the same time the axial ASAS criteria, were evaluated using an epidemiological questionnaire that included among others clinical data, BASDAI, BASFI, ASQoL, ASDAS and plasma levels of CRP, ESR, MCP-1, IL-8, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. IL-8 varied in proportion to disease activity rates (BASDAI and ASDAS) p < 0.05, being strongly correlated with the disease activity. The levels of adhesion molecules I-CAM and VCAM, as described in other studies, were positively correlated with predisposing factors for cardiovascular disease. IL-8 has shown to be strongly correlated with clinical markers of disease activity and inflammatory activity and may be an additional variable to the overall assessment of the activity of the AS.
Asunto(s)
Endotelio Vascular/inmunología , Interleucina-8/sangre , Espondilitis Anquilosante/diagnóstico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/inmunología , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inmunología , Quimiocina CCL2/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Molécula 1 de Adhesión Intercelular/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espondilitis Anquilosante/sangre , Espondilitis Anquilosante/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Molécula 1 de Adhesión Celular Vascular/sangreRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic multisystem osteoarticular disease that requires specialized care. Most Brazilians depend on the public healthcare provided by the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). This study aimed to describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients with PsA in follow-up in SUS, focusing on the incidence and prevalence of the disease, comorbidities, and hospitalizations. METHODS: We collected data from the Outpatient Data System of SUS (Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do SUS, SIA/SUS) regarding outpatient visits and hospitalizations in the Brazilian public healthcare system from January 2008 to March 2021 using the Techtrials Disease Explorer® platform and the medical code related to PsA were selected. RESULTS: We evaluated 40,009 patients and found a prevalence of 24.4 cases of visits due to PsA per 100,000 patients in follow-up in SUS. Female patients were predominant (54.38%). The incidence of visits due to PsA has been increasing in recent years and we observed an incidence of 8,982 new visits in 2020. The main comorbidities of these patients were osteoarthritis, lower back pain, shoulder injuries, oncological diseases, crystal arthropathies, and osteoporosis. Hospitalizations were mainly due to treating clinical or cardiovascular conditions and performing orthopedic procedures. CONCLUSION: The number of visits due to PsA in SUS has increased in recent years, mainly on account of new diagnoses of the disease, although the prevalence found in this study's population was lower than that observed in the general population.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Femenino , Artritis Psoriásica/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
Over time, clinicians have become increasingly comfortable embracing the prescription of biosimilars-highly similar versions of innovator or reference biological agents-for their patients with inflammatory diseases. Although a switch from a reference product to a licensed biosimilar version (or vice versa) is a medical decision robustly supported by the stepwise accumulation of clinical trial evidence concerning comparable safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy between these products, a switch from one biosimilar to another biosimilar of the same reference product, or a cross-switch, is not. Similarity among biosimilars of a reference product is not a regulatory agency concern and therefore is unlikely to be investigated in randomized controlled trials in the foreseeable future. Yet in clinical practice, across a diverse range of patients, the option to cross-switch from one biosimilar to another can and does arise for valid reasons such as convenience or tolerability issues, or driven by third parties (e.g., payers). In the absence of clinical trial data, clinicians must attempt to objectively evaluate the emerging real-world cross-switching evidence within the context of what is known about the science underpinning a designation of biosimilar. That knowledge then needs to be integrated with what clinicians know about their patients and their disease on a case-by-case basis. This review aims to consolidate relevant emerging real-world data and other key information about biosimilar-to-biosimilar cross-switching for prescribing clinicians. In the absence of clear clinical guidelines addressing this topic at present, this review may serve to facilitate discretionary and educated treatment decision making.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Animales , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and systemic immune disease characterized by inflammation of peripheral and/or axial joints and entheses in patients with psoriasis (PsO). Extra-articular and extracutaneous manifestations and numerous comorbidities can also be present. These recommendations replace the previous version published in May 2013. A systematic review of the literature retrieved 191 articles that were used to formulate 12 recommendations in response to 12 clinical questions, divided into 4 sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment, conventional drug therapy and biologic therapy. These guidelines provide evidence-based information on the clinical management for PsA patients. For each recommendation, the level of evidence (highest available), degree of strength (Oxford) and degree of expert agreement (interrater reliability) are reported.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Psoriasis , Reumatología , Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artritis Psoriásica/terapia , Terapia Biológica , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of chronic inflammatory systemic diseases characterized by axial and/or peripheral joints inflammation, as well as extra-articular manifestations. Over some decades, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the basis for the pharmacological treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, the emergence of the immunobiologic agents brought up the discussion about the role of NSAIDs in the management of these patients. The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations for the use of NSAIDs for the treatment of axSpA. A panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials for 15 predefined questions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations were used, and at least 70% agreement of the voting panel was needed. Fourteen recommendations for the use of NSAIDs in the treatment of patients with axSpA were elaborated. The purpose of these recommendations is to support clinicians' decision making, without taking out his/her autonomy when prescribing for an individual patient.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Brasil , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reumatología , Sociedades Médicas , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate risk factors associated with unfavourable outcomes: emergency care, hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation and death in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) and COVID-19. METHODS: Analysis of the first 8 weeks of observational multicentre prospective cohort study (ReumaCoV Brasil register). Patients with IMRD and COVID-19 according to the Ministry of Health criteria were classified as eligible for the study. RESULTS: 334 participants were enrolled, a majority of them women, with a median age of 45 years; systemic lupus erythematosus (32.9%) was the most frequent IMRD. Emergency care was required in 160 patients, 33.0% were hospitalised, 15.0% were admitted to the ICU and 10.5% underwent mechanical ventilation; 28 patients (8.4%) died. In the multivariate adjustment model for emergency care, diabetes (prevalence ratio, PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.73; p=0.004), kidney disease (PR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77; p=0.020), oral glucocorticoids (GC) (PR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85; p<0.001) and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.67; p=0.001) remained significant; for hospitalisation, age >50 years (PR 1.89; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.85; p=0.002), no use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (PR 2.51;95% CI 1.16 to 5.45; p=0.004) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy (PR 2.50; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.92; p<0.001); for ICU admission, oral GC (PR 2.24; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.71; p<0.001) and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (PR 1.65; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68; p<0.043); the two variables associated with death were pulse therapy with methylprednisolone or cyclophosphamide (PR 2.86; 95% CI 1.59 to 5.14; p<0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Age >50 years and immunosuppression with GC and cyclophosphamide were associated with unfavourable outcomes of COVID-19. Treatment with TNFi may have been protective, perhaps leading to the COVID-19 inflammatory process.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The inadequate storage of biopharmaceuticals may result in an ineffective therapeutic response since poor conservation can lead to the emergence of protein aggregates and cause immunogenicity in patients, which can increase the risk of adverse events by inducing the production of anti-drug antibodies. This can also lead to significant economic losses for public health, given the high cost of these medicines. The aim of this study was to verify whether the home storage of biopharmaceuticals dispensed by the Unified Public System was in accordance with the manufacturers' specified standards and whether external variables interfered with the correct home storage. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis who were using a biologic exclusively dispensed by Unified Public System were included. Storage temperature was measured by digital thermometer inserted into the refrigerator of the participant's home. Fisher's exact test was performed to cross-reference the temperature data and the qualitative variables obtained using an epidemiologic questionnaire. Mean, minimum, maximum values and standard deviation were described in the quantitative data. Mann-Whitney non-parametric test was performed to the association between temperature excursion and the number of people in the house. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were included and 67 (82.71%) did not maintain home storage correctly. The maximum temperature observed among all patients was 15.5 °C, the minimum was - 4.4 °C and the average was 5.6 °C (standard deviation 2.8); 10 (12.3%) had at least one negative temperature measured. The average time for participants who had an inadequate temperature record was 8 h and 31 min. Nine participants (90%) who stored the medication into the shelf/drawer below the freezer had a temperature excursion (p = 0.011). Most of the participants (88.5%) who stored their biopharmaceutical near the back side, close to the wall of the refrigerator had a negative temperature record (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most of the study participants (82.71%) did not maintain adequate home storage conditions for their biopharmaceutical. Intrinsic factors of household refrigerators may be involved in temperature deviations.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biofarmacia , Almacenaje de Medicamentos/normas , Refrigeración/normas , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Psoriásica/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Almacenaje de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/inmunología , TemperaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The severity of nail disease, the presence of arthralgia and fatigue are predictors of development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis (Pso). In children, little is known about the musculoskeletal (MSK) impairment in patients with Pso and its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequencies of pain and MSK inflammation (i.e., arthritis, enthesitis, and sacroiliitis) among children and adolescents with Pso and its relationship to HRQoL and fatigue. METHODS: Pediatric patients with Pso underwent a rheumatologic physical examination to evaluate synovitis, enthesalgia, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain and tender points of fibromyalgia. The core set of domains recommended by the GRAPPA - OMERACT to be measured in PsA studies was assessed. Ultrasound (US) was performed in clinical cases of enthesitis, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in cases of SIJ pain. RESULTS: Forty-three participants (10 ± 2.9 years old) were evaluated. Pain on palpation of the entheses was observed in 10 (23.2%) patients and pain on SIJ palpation was observed in 3 (7%). No patient presented with synovitis; one presented with enthesitis on US, but MRI did not confirm sacroiliitis in any case. Patients with MSK pain had greater skin disease severity (PASI 5.4 vs. 2, p < 0.01), worse fatigue, and lower HRQoL scores on all instruments used. The estimated risk of HRQoL impairment was eight times higher in the presence of MSK pain, which was an independent predictive factor. With a NAPSI greater than 30, the probability of pain was greater than 80%. CONCLUSION: MSK pain is frequent among children with Pso, related to the severity of skin and nail disease, and negatively affects HRQoL. The typically used complementary exams might not detect the inflammatory process caused by Pso.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/complicaciones , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Artralgia/complicaciones , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/epidemiología , Artritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis Psoriásica/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Entesopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Fatiga/complicaciones , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Uña/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Uña/diagnóstico , Palpación , Sacroileítis/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Spondyloarthritis is a group of chronic inflammatory systemic diseases characterized by axial and/or peripheral joints inflammation, as well as extra-articular manifestations. The classification axial spondyloarthritis is adopted when the spine and/or the sacroiliac joints are predominantly involved. This version of recommendations replaces the previous guidelines published in May 2013.A systematic literature review was performed, and two hundred thirty-seven studies were selected and used to formulate 29 recommendations answering 15 clinical questions, which were divided into four sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological therapy, conventional drug therapy and biological therapy. For each recommendation the level of evidence supporting (highest available), the strength grade according to Oxford, and the degree of expert agreement (inter-rater reliability) is informed.These guidelines bring evidence-based information on clinical management of axial SpA patients, including, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.