Case series of aortic arch disease treated with branched stent-grafts.

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of aortic arch pathology is complex and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Alternative approaches have been developed to reduce these risks, including the use of thoracic stent-grafts with fenestrations or in combination with bypass procedures to maintain supra-aortic trunk blood flow. Branched stent-grafts are a novel approach to treat aortic arch pathology. METHODS: Consecutive patients with aortic arch disease presenting to a single university hospital vascular centre were considered for branched stent-graft repair (October 2010 to January 2017). Patients were assessed in a multidisciplinary setting including a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and vascular surgeon. All patients were considered prohibitively high risk for standard open surgical repair. The study used reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair and PROCESS (Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery) guidelines. RESULTS: Some 30 patients (25 men) underwent attempted branch stent-graft repair. Mean age was 68 (range 37-84) years. Eighteen patients had chronic aortic dissection, 11 patients had an aneurysm and one had a penetrating ulcer. Fourteen patients had disease in aortic arch zone 0, six in zone 1 and ten in zone 2. Twenty-five patients had undergone previous aortic surgery and 24 required surgical revascularization of the left subclavian artery. Technical success was achieved in 27 of 30 patients. Four patients had an endoleak (type Ia, 1; type II, 3). The in-hospital mortality rate was three of 30. Mean length of follow-up was 12·0 (range 1·0-67·8) months, during which time 12 patients required an aortic-related reintervention. CONCLUSION: Repair of aortic arch pathology using branched stent-grafting appears feasible. Before widespread adoption of this technology, further studies are required to standardize the technique and identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

Changes in Renal Anatomy After Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To assess short- and long-term movement of renal arteries after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent FEVAR at one institution with a custom-made device designed with fenestrations for the superior mesenteric (SMA) and renal arteries, a millimetric computed tomography angiography (CTA), and a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were included. Angulation between renal artery trunk and aorta, clock position of the origin of the renal arteries, distance between renal arteries and SMA, and target vessel occlusion were retrospectively collected and compared between the pre-operative, post-operative (<6 months), and last (>12 months) CTA. RESULTS: From October 2004 to January 2014, 100 patients met the inclusion criteria and 86% of imaging was available for accurate analysis. Median follow-up was 27.3 months (22.7-50.1). There were no renal occlusions. A significant change was found in the value of renal trunk angulation of both renal arteries on post-operative compared with pre-operative CTA (17° difference upward [7.5-29], p < .001), but no significant change thereafter (p = .5). Regarding renal clock positions (7.5° of change equivalent to 15 min of renal ostial movement): significant anterior change was found between post-operative and pre-operative CTA (15 min [0-30], p = .03 on the left and 15 min [15-30], p < .001 on the right), without significant change thereafter (15 min [0-30], p = .18 on the left and 15 min [0-15] on the right, p = .28). No changes were noted on the distance between renal and SMA ostia (difference of 1.65 mm [1-2.5], p = .63). CONCLUSION: The renal arteries demonstrate tolerance to permanent changes in angulation after FEVAR of approximately 17° upward trunk movement and of 15-30 min ostial movement without adverse consequences on patency after a median of more than 2 years' follow-up. The distance between the target vessels remained stable over time. These results may suggest accommodation to sizing errors and thus a compliance with off the shelf devices in favourable anatomies.

Renal Outcomes Following Fenestrated and Branched Endografting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze immediate and long-term renal outcomes (renal function and renal events) after fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (BEVAR). METHODS: All FEVAR and BEVAR performed between October 2004 and October 2012 were included in this study. Post-operative acute renal failure (ARF) was defined according to the RIFLE criteria. Renal volume (calculated with a 3D workstation) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula) were evaluated before the procedure, before discharge, 12 months after, and yearly thereafter. Renal stent occlusion, dissection, fracture, stenosis, kink, renal stent related endoleak, and renal stent secondary intervention were all considered "renal composite events" and analyzed. A time to event analysis was performed for renal events and secondary renal interventions. RESULTS: 225 patients were treated with FEVAR and BEVAR. Renal target vessels (n = 427) were perfused by fenestrations (n = 374), or branches (n = 53). Median follow up was 3.1 years (2.9-3.3 years). Technical success was achieved in 95.5% of patients. Post-operative ARF was seen in 64 patients (29%). Mean total renal volume and eGFR at 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year follow up were significantly lower when compared with pre-operative levels (after BEVAR and FEVAR); the decrease at 3 years was 14.8% (6.7%; 22.2%) (p = .0006) for total renal volume and 14.3% (3.1%; 24.3%) (p = .02) for eGFR. The 30 day and 5 year freedom from renal composite event was 98.6% (95.8-99.6%) and 84.5% (76.5-89.9%) after FEVAR and BEVAR (NS). The 30 day and 5 year freedom from renal occlusion was 99.5% (96.7-99.9%) and 94.4% (89.3-97.1%) after FEVAR and BEVAR (NS). CONCLUSION: FEVAR and BEVAR are durable options for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and are associated with low renal morbidity, without differences between devices types. The clinical impact of decreasing renal volume over time in these patients is yet to be fully understood.

The impact of early pelvic and lower limb reperfusion and attentive peri-operative management on the incidence of spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. In an attempt to reduce its incidence two peri-procedural changes were implemented by the authors in January 2010: (i) all large sheaths are withdrawn from the iliac arteries immediately after deploying the central device and before cannulation and branch extension to the visceral vessels; (ii) the peri-operative protocol has been modified in an attempt to optimize oxygen delivery to the sensitive cells of the cord (aggressive blood and platelet transfusion, median arterial pressure monitoring >85 mmHg, and systematic cerebrospinal fluid drainage). METHODS: Between October 2004 and December 2013, 204 endovascular TAAA repairs were performed using custom made devices manufactured with branches and fenestrations to maintain visceral vessel perfusion. Data from all of these procedures were prospectively collected in an electronic database. Early post-operative results in patients treated before (group 1, n = 43) and after (group 2, n = 161 patients) implementation of the modified implantation and peri-operative protocols were compared. RESULTS: Patients in groups 1 and 2 had similar comorbidities (median age at repair 70.9 years [range 65.2-77.0 years]), aneurysm characteristics (median diameter 58.5 mm [range 53-65 mm]), and length of procedure (median 190 minutes [range 150-240 minutes]). The 30 day mortality rate was 11.6% in group 1 versus 5.6% in group 2 (p = .09). The SCI rate was 14.0% versus 1.2% (p < .01). If type IV TAAAs were excluded from this analysis, the SCI rate was 25.0% (6/24 patients) in group 1 versus 2.1% (2/95 patients) in group 2 (p < .01). CONCLUSION: The early restoration of arterial flow to the pelvis and lower limbs, and aggressive peri-operative management significantly reduces SCI following type I-III TAAA endovascular repair. With the use of these modified protocols, extensive TAAA endovascular repairs are associated with low rates of SCI.

Benefits of Completion 3D Angiography Associated with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Technical Success after EVAR.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a new strategy to assess technical success after standard and complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), combining completion contrast enhanced cone beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) and post-operative contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Patients treated with bifurcated or fenestrated and branched endografts in the hybrid room during the study period were included. From December 2012 to July 2013, a completion angiogram (CA) was performed at the end of the procedure, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge (group 1). From October 2013 to April 2014, a completion ceCBCT was performed, followed by CEUS during the 30 day post-operative period (group 2). The rate of peri-operative events (type I or III endoleaks, kinks, occlusion of target vessels), need for additional procedures or early secondary procedures, total radiation exposure (mSv), and total volume of contrast medium injected were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in group 1 and 54 in group 2. Peri-operative event rates were respectively 8.9% (n = 7) and 33.3% (n = 18) (p = .001). Additional procedures were performed in seven patients (8.9%) in group 1 versus 17 (31.5%) in group 2 (p = .001). Two early secondary procedures were performed in group 2 (3.7%), and three (3.8%) in group 1 (p = .978). Median radiation exposure due to CBCT was 7 Gy cm(2) (5.25-8) (36%, 27%, and 9% of the total procedure exposure, respectively for bifurcated, fenestrated, and branched endografts). CEUS did not diagnose endoleaks or any adverse events not diagnosed by ceCBCT. Overall radiation and volume of contrast injected during the patient hospital stay in groups 1 and 2 were 34 (25.8-47.3) and 11 (5-20.5) mSv, and 184 (150-240) and 91 (70-132.8) mL respectively (reduction of 68% and 50%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Completion ceCBCT is achievable in routine practice to assess technical success after EVAR. Strategies to evaluate technical success combining ceCBCT and CEUS can reduce total in hospital radiation exposure and contrast medium volume injection.

Total endovascular treatment of an aortic arch aneurysm in a patient with a mechanical aortic valve.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms using an inner-branched device is a new treatment option for patients unfit for open surgery. There are many anatomical restrictions, such as the presence of a mechanical aortic valve that can contraindicate this complete endovascular approach. REPORT: A new delivery system to overcome this issue has been developed. This new system was used to treat an aortic arch aneurysm 77 mm in diameter in a 37-year-old patient with Marfan's syndrome. The patient was considered to be at major risk for open surgery because of severe respiratory insufficiency following a second sternotomy. DISCUSSION: Total endovascular arch aneurysm repair is no longer contraindicated in patients with a mechanical aortic valve.

Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exposure to radiation during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with intraoperative guidance by preoperative computed tomographic angiogram fusion. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent standard bifurcated (BIF) or thoracic (THO), and complex fenestrated (FEN) or branched (BR) EVAR were prospectively enrolled. Indirect dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), and contrast medium volume were recorded. These data were compared with a previously published prospective EVAR cohort of 301 patients and to other literature. Direct DAP and peak skin dose were measured with radiochromic films. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: From December 2012 to July 2013, 102 patients underwent standard (56.8%) or complex (43.2%) EVAR. The indirect DAP (Gy.cm(2)) was as follows: BIF 12.2 (8.7-19.9); THO 26.0 (11.9-34.9); FEN 43.7 (24.7-57.5); and BR 47.4 (37.2-108.2). The FT (min) was as follows: BIF 10.6 (9.1-14.7); THO 8.9 (6.0-10.5); FEN 30.7 (20.2-40.5); and BR 39.5 (34.8-51.6). The contrast medium volume (mL) was as follows: BIF 59.0 (50.0-75.0); THO 80.0 (50.0-100.0); FEN 105.0 (70.0-136.0); and BR 120.0 (100.0-170.0). When compared with a previous cohort, there was a significant reduction in DAP during BIF, FEN, and BR procedures, and a significant reduction of iodinated contrast volume during FEN and BR procedures. There was also a significant reduction in DAP during BIF procedures when compared with the literature (p < .01). DAP measurement on radiochromic films was strongly correlated with indirect DAP values (r(2) = .93). CONCLUSION: The exposure of patients and operators to radiation is significantly reduced by routine use of image fusion during standard and complex EVAR.

A new score to predict post operative complications after endovascular treatment of thoraco abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The endovascular treatment of thoraco abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is a minimally invasive solution. However, patient selection remains a major problem. We have analysed our experience to identify the risk factors for post-operative morbidity and mortality and to construct a scoring system to identify those patients likely to benefit from this treatment. METHODS: We have analysed a consecutive cohort of patients treated electively for TAAA using endovascular techniques between 2006 and October 2012. All data were collected prospectively. The risk factors associated with spinal cord ischemia (SCI), the need for post-operative dialysis and 30 day mortality were determined using multivariate statistical techniques and a logistic regression model including all variables that were significant on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). A predictive score was calculated using a Received Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, defining best specificity and sensibility. RESULTS: We analysed the data from 123 patients (median age 70 years). The 30 day mortality rate was 8% (10 patients). The SCI rate was 6% (7 patients). One patient (1%) required long-term dialysis after the aortic procedure. The cumulative early mortality, SCI and permanent dialysis rate was 14% (17 patients). In multivariate analysis, adverse outcome was associated with advanced age (OR = 1.110 ; p = 0.022), and Crawford type I or II or III (OR = 9.292 ; p = 0.002) as compared with Crawford type IV. Pre-operative beta blocker (BB) treatment was a protective factor (OR = 0.099 ; p = 0.005). A predictive score was then constructed : Score = -10.060 + 0.104x(A) +2.229x(B) -2.315x(C) (A = patient age ; B = 1 if TAAA Crawford type 1, 2 or 3, 0 if TAAA type 4 ; C = 1 if on-going BB treatment (30 days pre-surgery minimum), 0 if none). Its sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a simple predictive scoring system. This tool is useful in predicting the most feared complications after endovascular TAAA repair and has potential use in the identification and counselling of vulnerable patients being considered for surgery. More data are needed to refine the prediction of individual operative risks.

An optimal combination for EVAR: low profile endograft body and continuous spiral stent limbs.

AIM: to evaluate the outcomes of EVAR performed with a new generation of bifurcated endografts and limbs. METHODS: prospectively collected data from fifty consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated at our institution with a Low Profile Zenith(®) bifurcated body/Zenith(®) Spiral-Z legs combo were analysed. AngioCT scans and Ultrasound exams were performed prior to discharge. Ultrasound examination was repeated 6 months after the procedure to assess endograft patency and to depict endoleaks RESULTS: Median age was 70.6 years [50-88] and median ASA score was 3 [2-4]. Median aortic diameter was 56 mm [49-81]. Of the 100 external iliac access vessels, 14 had a diameter of 6 mm or lower. All endografts were successfully implanted. Post-operative Ultrasound examination and angioCT scan depicted both 1 type Ia, and 10 and 19 type 2 endoleaks respectively. An asymptomatic thrombosis of the left external iliac artery distal to the endograft limb was also depicted. 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients died respectively three and four months after EVAR. Both deaths were not aneurysm related. All patients underwent an ultrasound exam 6-12 months after EVAR. All endografts main bodies and limbs were patent. Five endoleaks were depicted, all were type II endoleaks (the early type Ia endoleak had sealed spontaneously; it was confirmed by an angioCT scan). One patient presented a significant stenosis of the left iliac limb at the level of a narrow and calcified aortic bifurcation. It was successfully treated by bilateral iliac angioplasty and kissing balloon stenting. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR performed with the Zenith LP main body in combination with Spiral-Z Iliac Legs is safe and effective. No limb occlusions were diagnosed at the 6 month follow up even in challenging iliac anatomies usually considered as contra indications for EVAR. Our first results are most satisfying and calling to be completed by a longer follow up.

The benefits of EVAR planning using a 3D workstation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of planning endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a three-dimensional (3D) workstation on early and midterm outcomes. METHODS: All patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR performed between 2006 and 2009 at our institution were included in the current study. Prior to 2008 (group 1), endograft sizing was performed by interrogation of computed tomography angiography axial images. After 2008 (group 2), endograft sizing was routinely performed using a 3D workstation (Aquarius, Terarecon), allowing for multiplanar reconstruction and centerline analysis. Pre-, peri-, postoperative, and follow-up data were prospectively entered in an electronic database. All postoperative complications and subsequent secondary interventions depicted during the 2-year period following EVAR were compared. Secondary intervention and mortality rates were defined at 2 years and compared. Freedom from secondary intervention and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method during follow-up and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients (149 patients in group 1 and 146 patients in group 2) were included. All patients had completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. During this 2-year period following EVAR, the type 1 endoleak rate was 8.7% in group 1 and 1.4% in group 2 (p = .004) respectively. Secondary intervention rates related to type 1 endoleak was 5.4% in group 1 and 0 in group 2 (p < .001). No difference was observed regarding all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related death, and freedom from secondary intervention rates during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The routine use of 3D workstations for EVAR planning significantly reduces the rate of type 1 endoleaks and, therefore, the rate of related secondary interventions.

Evaluation of radiation during EVAR performed on a mobile C-arm.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure during aortic endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on a mobile C-arm using a low dose and pulse mode. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on patients undergoing EVAR. Indirect dose measurements of dose area product (DAP, mGy m²) calculated by the C-arm (OEC 9900MD), fluoroscopic time (FT), type of procedure, contrast media volume and body mass index were analysed. To confirm the correlation between direct and indirect DAP measurements, direct dose was measured with radiochromic films on a sample of 15 patients. Film grey level response was calibrated according to a reference dose measurement performed with a calibrated dosimeter. DAP and peak skin dose (PSD, Gy) were measured on each film. Correlation between DAP from direct and indirect measures, and between DAP and PSD, were analysed. RESULTS: From January 2009 to April 2011, 335 patients underwent EVAR. Complete data were available on 301 procedures including 188 bifurcated, 54 fenestrated, 28 thoracic, 20 branched and 11 aorto-uni-iliac endografts implantation. The respective median FT and DAP was 9.36 min (1.8-67) and 3 mGy m(2) (0.4-28); 27.2 min (2-69) and 7.3 mGy m(2) (1.2-29); 7.75 min (1.2-19.1) and 2 mGy m(2) (0.3-11); 42.98 min (2.4-95.4) and 15.95 mGy m(2) (2.98-77.7); 6.2 min (0.5-36.3) and 2 mGy m(2) (0.3-11). Direct DAP measurement on radiochromic films was strongly correlated with DAP values provided by the C-arm (r = 0.98). PSD correlated weakly with DAP. DAP was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in patients with a body mass index >30. Contrast media volume was significantly increased in the branched endograft group. CONCLUSION: Indirect DAP values measured by the C-arm are accurate to evaluate radiation exposure. Compared to the literature, our values for standard procedures are significantly decreased by the usage of low dose and pulse mode. DAP for fenestrated and branched procedures was comparable to published DAP values with standard procedures using a regular fluoroscopic mode.

Technical note and results in the management of anatomical variants of renal vascularisation during endovascular aneurysm repair.

INTRODUCTION: The revascularisation of large (>3 mm) renal arteries emerging from the proximal sealing zone or off the aneurismal wall can be challenging during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. In this article, we describe various endovascular techniques using custom-made endografts to treat these complex variant anatomies. CASES: Nine patients deemed unfit for open repair with unusual renal vascularisation associated with aortic aneurysms were treated by endovascular means. After three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions on a dedicated workstation, custom-made devices were designed and manufactured. The revascularisation of multiple renal arteries and aberrant origins of renal arteries, associated or not with pelvic kidney or horseshoe kidney, was managed using fenestrated and branched endografts. RESULTS: All target vessels were patent on computed tomography (CT) scan and contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation before discharge as well as on the 6-month follow-up. One patient presented a decrease of postoperative glomerular filtration rate over 30% but did not require dialysis. No sac enlargement was depicted, and no reintervention was performed during follow-up. Three type 2 endoleaks were diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment with fenestrated and branched endografts should be considered in challenging renal artery anatomies in patients unfit for open repair.

Hepatorenal bypass allowing fenestrated endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case report.

A 61-year-old man presented with a 66-mm juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. He was unfit for open repair. The anatomical proximity of his right renal artery (RRA) and his superior mesenteric artery (SMA) precluded fabrication of an endograft allowing perfusion of both vessels. He underwent a hepato-renal bypass to his RRA and subsequent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using an endoprosthesis with fenestrations for the SMA and the left renal artery (LRA), and a scallop for the coeliac trunk. Follow-up imaging showed all visceral vessels to be perfused. The use of this limited hybrid approach allows endovascular treatment of aneurysms that are initially unsuitable for such an approach.

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early outcomes following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair utilising fenestrated and branched endografts. DESIGN AND MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of all patients undergoing endovascular repair of TAAA in a single academic centre. All patients were deemed unfit for open surgical repair. Customised endografts were designed using CT data reconstructed on 3D workstations. Post-operatively all patients were evaluated radiologically at hospital discharge, at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients (30 males) were treated over 33 months (August 2006 to April 2009). Median age and aneurysm size were 70 years (range 50-83 years) and 64 mm (range 55-100 mm) respectively. 114/116 (98%) of the targeted visceral vessels were successfully catheterised and perfused. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9% (3/33). Transient spinal cord ischaemia was diagnosed in 4/33 (12%) patients, and permanent paraplegia in one (3%). The median follow-up period was 11 months (range 1-33 months). Endoleaks were identified in 5/33 (15%) patients: type II in four patients and a type III endoleak in one patient which required the only secondary intervention. During follow-up, two patients died: one from stroke and the other from myocardial infarction 9 and 29 months respectively after the procedure. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study, which includes our learning curve, confirms the feasibility and safety of the endovascular repair of TAAA in high-risk patients. Meticulous follow-up to assess sac behaviour and visceral perfusion is critical in order to ensure optimal results of these complex endovascular repairs requiring numerous mating components.

A comparison of the mid-term results following the use of bifurcated and aorto-uni-iliac devices in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To compare the mid-term results following the use of bifurcated (ABIS) and aorto-uniiliac (AUIS) endovascular devices in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in a population of patients deemed to be at high risk for open surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 4 year period (January 2003 to December 2007), 447 underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using ZENITH) stent-grafts. Group I comprised patients treated using the AUIS (n=124), and group II those receiving ABIS (n=323). Outcome measures included the assisted technical success rate, perioperative mortality, major complications, freedom from reintervention, and primary and secondary patencies. Factors associated with mid-term clinical failures were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The assisted primary technical success rate was 94% and 99% in groups I and II respectively (p=.002). Major perioperative complications occurred in 13 group I patients (10%) vs. 12 group II patients (4%) (p=.005). The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% vs.1.5% (p=0.2). TASC C and D iliac lesions significantly increased the risk of major perioperative complications (35% vs. 3%; OR=14.94; 95% CI: 5.75 to 38.78; p<.0001). During the follow-up period (median 24 months), secondary procedures were required in 11% and 5% of group I and group II patients respectively (p=.01). Freedom from reintervention at 12, 24 and 36 months was 98%, 90%, and 85% in group I vs. 96%, 92%, and 92% in group II (P<0.005). The primary and secondary patency rates at 3 years were 92% vs. 98% (p=.003) and 97% vs. 99% (p=.04) for groups I and II respectively. In group I, the Crossover Femoro-Femoral Bypass (CFFB) was responsible for 3 major complications (2.4%) which occurred at 7, 12 and 57 months of follow-up. However, the use of AUIS with CFFB did not independently increase the risk of major complications during follow-up (HR=0.108; 95% CI: 0.007 to 1.637; p=.11, Cox proportion model). In both univariate and multivariate analysis, concomitant iliac arterial occlusive disease (IAOD) was the only significant predictor of clinical failure in study population as a whole (OR=3.996; 95% CI: 1.996 to 7.921; p<.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ABIS is associated with better results than AUIS in the management of patients with AAA. Iliac artery occlusive disease was more frequently diagnosed in the AUIS group and this was significantly associated with a higher risk of complications, while the crossover graft itself was not. Nevertheless, the outcomes for both groups are encouraging in this high risk population.

Endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a literature review of early and mid-term results.

Successful endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires undilated proximal (infrarenal neck) and distal landing zones (common or external iliac arteries). A range of approved endografts are available to exclude such aneurysms. Recent multicentric prospective randomized trials have demonstrated a short and midterm decrease in aneurysm-related deaths of the endovascular technique compared to open surgery. These results have induced an overall increase in the rate of endovascular repair of AAA. Patients with more complex aortic aneurysms, involving the visceral vessels (juxta, para and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAA), have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality after open repair compared to AAA. These patients could potentially benefit from an endovascular approach. Branched and fenestrated endografts have been developed to address this endovascular challenge. This review was carried out on the current literature evaluating these new endovascular complex procedures. Spinal cord ischemia, 30-day mortality and branch patency rates after endovascular exclusion of TAAA ranged from 2.7% to 20%, 0% to 9.1% and 96% to 100% respectively. Mid-term results of endovascular complex aortic repairs are favourable compared to open surgery in high risk patients. Long-term results will be necessary to evaluate specific complications such as migration, material fatigue and component separation that can result in loss of visceral branches.

Zenith abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular graft: a literature review.

The early experience of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using ''first generation'' devices was disappointing. There was an appreciable incidence of delayed, post-EVAR, aneurysm rupture. This was primarily a consequence of structural device failure. These failures provided important lessons for re-design and the modern ''second generation'' devices, including the Zenith (Cook Inc, Bloomington, IN, USA) endograft, are thought to be more reliable, particularly providing better fixation and sealing and also a more durable stent/fabric structure. This article comprises a review of the English literature detailing the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Zenith endograft. It focuses on clinical studies or trials with intermediate to long-term follow-up, and related the literature to our own experience. In the series examined (N.=2 017 patients) the early mortality rate ranged from 0% to 4.1% and the technical success rate from 97.7% to 100%. The re-intervention rate was related to the length of follow-up (6.8% to 14%). Conversion rates were consistently <1%. There was a low incidence of device migration, limb thrombosis, component separation and stent fracture. These data support the ongoing use of the Zenith endovascular graft in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms suitable for EVAR.

Evaluation of a new imaging software for aortic endograft planning.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new 3D Workstation workflow (EVAR Assist, Advantage Windows, GE Healthcare, Chalfont, UK) (EA-AW) designed to simplify complex EVAR planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans of patients who underwent repair at our institution of a complex aortic aneurysm using fenestrated endovascular repair (f-EVAR) between January and September 2014, were reviewed. For each patient, imaging analysis (12 measures: aortic diameters and length and "clock position" of visceral artery) was performed on two different workstations: Aquarius (TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA, USA) and EA-AW. According to a standardized protocol, three endovascular surgeons experienced in aortic endograft planning, performed image analyses and data collection independently. We analyzed an internal assessment between observers (on the Aquarius 3DWS) and an external assessment comparing these results with the planning center (PC) data used to custom the fenestrated endograft of the patients enrolled in this study. Finally, we compared both 3DWS data to determine the accuracy and the reproducibility. A p-value < .05 was considered as statistically significant. Complete agreement between operators was defined as 1.0. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer variability (interclass correlation coefficients - ICC: 0.81-.091) was very low and confirmed the reliability of our planners. The ICC comparison between EA-AW and Aquarius was excellent (> 0.8 for both), thus confirming the reproducibility and reliability of the new EA-AW application. Aortic and iliac necks diameters and lengths were similarly reported with both workstations. In our study, the mean difference in distance and orientation evaluation of target vessels evaluated by the two workstations was marginal and has no impact on clinical practice in term of device manufacturing. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that complex EVAR planning can be performed with this new dedicated 3D workstation workflow with a good reproducibility.

Current and future perspectives in the repair of aneurysms involving the aortic arch.

The repair of aneurysms involving the aortic arch is technically and physiologically demanding. Historically, these aneurysms have been treated using open surgical techniques that require cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Many patients have been deemed "untreatable" and among those selected for surgery there are reported risks of death in 2% to 16.5% and stroke rates ranging from 2% to 18%. "Hybrid arch repair" combines one of a number of open surgical procedures (to secure a proximal landing zone for an endograft) with subsequent or immediate placement of an endograft in the arch and descending aorta. Although this concept is described as "minimally invasive" because it avoids aortic cross-clamping and hypothermic circulatory arrest, the morbidity and mortality rates remain considerable (mortality 0% to 15%, stroke 0% to 11%). Ongoing development of endograft technology has enabled total endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms involving the visceral segment, using fenestrated and branched endografts. Encouraging early results in this anatomy have inspired extension of the concept to include the aortic arch and great vessels. These strategies can be considered in patients generally at high-risk for the conventional procedures. However, the endeavour is at an early stage of its development and the arch poses unique challenges including the potential for stroke, angulation of the arch and the great vessel ostia to the arch, extremely high volume flow, three-dimensional pulsation and rotation with the cardiac cycle and the proximity of the aortic valve and coronary arteries.

Techniques to reduce radiation and contrast volume during EVAR.

There is a large variability observed in the literature regarding radiation exposure and contrast volume injection during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Reducing both in order to decrease their respective toxicities must be a priority for the endovascular therapist. Radiation dose reduction requires a strict application of the "as low as reasonably achievable" principles. Firstly, all X-ray system settings should be defaulted to low dose, and fluoroscopic time reduced as much as possible. Digital subtraction angiography runs should be replaced by recorded fluoroscopy runs when possible. Magnification should be avoided, whereas collimation should be systematic to minimize scatter radiation and focus only on the area of interest. Advanced imaging modes can also contribute to dose reduction. For instance, image fusion can facilitate endovascular navigation, and allow table and C-arm positioning without fluoroscopy. In our experience, routine use of image fusion during EVAR significantly reduces both radiation exposure and contrast volumes during complex EVAR. To make these imaging modes useable in real life settings, the X-ray system should be fully controlled by the operator from table side. Reducing iodinated contrast volume, while maintaining image quality, can also be achieved through the use of automated contrast injectors. Additionally, alternative contrast agents, like carbon dioxide (CO2) and gadolinium, have also been evaluated and can be used in specific cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravascular ultrasonography are currently developed as potential alternatives to both iodinated contrast use and X-ray during EVAR. Lastly, specific education and training of operators in radiation protection are essential.