Effect of Changing Surgical Instruments Before Wound Closure to Prevent Wound Infection in Lower GI Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is a major surgical complication and has been studied extensively. However, the efficacy of changing surgical instruments before wound closure remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of changing surgical instruments to prevent incisional surgical site infection during lower GI surgery. DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Hyogo College of Medicine in Japan. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective lower GI surgery with open laparotomy were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In group A, the surgeon changed surgical instruments before wound closure, and in group B, the patients underwent conventional closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the incidence of incisional surgical site infection. The secondary end point was the incidence of surgical site infection restricted to clean-contaminated surgery. RESULTS: A total of 453 patients were eligible for this trial. The incidence of incisional surgical site infection was not significantly different between group A (18/213; 8.5%) and group B (24/224; 10.7%; p = 0.78). In the clean-contaminated surgery group, the incidence of incisional surgical site infection was 13 (6.8%) of 191 in group A and 9 (4.7%) of 190 in group B (p = 0.51). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Changing surgical instruments did not decrease the rate of incisional surgical site infection in patients undergoing lower GI surgery in either all wound classes or clean-contaminated conditions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B701. EFECTO DE REALIZAR CAMBIO DE LOS INSTRUMENTOS QUIRRGICOS ANTES DEL CIERRE DE LA INCISIN EN LA INFECCIN DE LA HERIDA DEL SITIO QUIRRGICO EN CIRUGA DEL TUBO DIGESTIVO BAJO ESTUDIO ALEATORIO CONTROLADO: ANTECEDENTES:La infección del sitio quirúrgico es una complicación importante y se ha estudiado ampliamente. Sin embargo, la eficacia de cambiar los instrumentos quirúrgicos antes del cierre de la herida sigue sin estar clara.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio es investigar la eficacia de cambiar el instrumental quirúrgico en la prevención de la infección del sitio quirúrgico en cirugía gastrointestinal inferior.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatorio controlado.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en la Facultad de Medicina de Hyogo en Japón.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a cirugía electiva de tubo digestivo bajo con laparotomía abierta.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a uno de dos grupos. En el grupo A, el cirujano cambió el instrumental quirúrgico antes del cierre de la herida, y en el grupo B, los pacientes se sometieron a un cierre convencional.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico de la incisión. El criterio de valoración secundario fue la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico restringida a la cirugía limpia contaminada.RESULTADOS:Un total de 453 pacientes fueron elegibles para este ensayo. La incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico no fue significativamente diferente entre el grupo A (18/213; 8,5%) y el grupo B (24/224; 10,7%) (p = 0,78). En el grupo de cirugía limpia-contaminada, la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico incisional fue 13/191 (6,8%) en el grupo A y 9/190 (4,7%) en el grupo B (p = 0,51).LIMITACIÓN:Estudio de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓNES:El cambio de instrumentos quirúrgicos no disminuyó la tasa de infección del sitio quirúrgico en todas las clases de heridas o condiciones limpias-contaminadas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B701.

Clinical results following colonic resection for ulcerative colitis in elderly individuals (elderly-onset vs. nonelderly onset).

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, but there are few reports comparing elderly UC patients undergoing colectomy for elderly-onset UC (EO) and nonelderly-onset UC (NEO). The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between EO and NEO patients who underwent UC-related surgery. METHODS: We identified 1973 patients with UC who underwent colectomy at Hyogo College of Medicine between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 2018. Only patients aged 65 years old and older who underwent colectomy were enrolled in this study (n = 221, 11.2%), and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age at disease onset: those with onset at younger than 60 years old (NEO) and at 60 years old or older (EO). RESULTS: In the 221 UC patients who underwent colectomy at 65 years old or older, there were 155 cases of EO and 66 cases of NEO. The main surgical indication in NEO patients was colitis-associated cancer/dysplasia (32/66, 47%). In contrast, refractory to medical treatment was the leading cause of surgery in EO patients (80/155, 52%). The distributions of surgical indications were different between the two groups (p < 0.01). The preoperative daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the EO group than in the NEOgroup (0 mg vs. 10 mg, p < 0.01). The rates of immunosuppressant, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab use did not differ significantly between the groups. Significantly more patients underwent emergency surgery in the EO group than in the NEO group (14% vs. 35%, p < 0.01). The proportions of patients with postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) were 17.4% (27/155) in the EO group and 13.6% (9/66) in the NEO group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.48). The prognosis of the EO patients who underwent UC-related emergency surgery was worse than that of the NEO patients (p < 0.01). In the EO group, 8 (14.8%) of 54 patients died within 30 postoperative days, while there were no deaths in the NEO group. CONCLUSION: Among elderly UC patients undergoing UC-related surgery, EO patients undergoing emergency surgery had very poor outcomes, and the mortality rate was 14.8%. In such cases, it is important for physicians and surgeons to begin communication at an early stage so that the optimal surgical timeframe is not missed.

Localization of recurrent lesions following ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) recurrence can occur not only at the site of anastomosis but also elsewhere in the bowel following an ileocolic resection (ICR) procedure. The aims of the present study were to assess long-term outcomes of a primary ICR procedure for CD in consecutive patients and examine the location of the reoperation causative lesion. METHODS: We examined cases of surgery with ICR initially performed at our institution. Those with simultaneous multiple bowel resection or bowel resection with strictureplasty were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients who underwent ICR due to CD were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 12.6 years (range 4-27 years). A reoperation was needed in 45 (26.6%), of whom 14 had lesions causative of the reoperation at other than the anastomotic site. The most common causative lesion location was in the colon rather than the oral side of the small intestine. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between presence of residual lesions following the initial surgery and lesions causative of reoperation. In the group without residual disease (n = 31), 29.0% (n = 9) had non-anastomotic lesions involved in indications for reoperation, while that was 35.7% (n = 5) in the group with residual disease (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic site lesion is not the only causative factor for reoperation following ICR. Regular examinations and applicable treatment with awareness that the cause of reoperation is not limited to the site of anastomosis are important in these cases.

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients after Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, to date few studies have examined functional outcomes or quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients after pouch construction. METHODS: In December 2017, we sent questionnaires to 224 patients aged 65 years and older at the time who underwent an IPAA at our hospital between June 1987 and May 2015 regarding issues related to QOL and functional outcomes. Responders aged 65-69 years old were defined as the elderly group (EG), while those 70 years old and over comprised the super-EG (SEG). RESULTS: The response rate was 60.7% (136/224); 70 patients were classified as EG, and 66 were classified as SEG. The SEG were older at the time of the IPAA and during the follow-up period (p < 0.01). The stool frequency per day was 8 times in both groups (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference between the EG and SEG with regard to daytime (53 vs. 56%, p = 0.73) or nighttime (65.7 vs. 53%, p = 0.16) soiling. There was also no difference in the exacerbation of daytime or nighttime soiling compared to the first year after the operation (daytime 5.7 vs. 12.1%, p = 0.23; nighttime 7.1 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.76). QOL was evaluated using the modified fecal incontinence QOL (mFIQL) scale, with no significant difference between the EG and SEG (27 vs. 31 points). Since both groups had mFIQL scores <50, QOL was considered to be maintained. CONCLUSION: In our analysis of elderly patients in the long-term period following surgery for UC, some noted fecal soiling, though QOL was largely maintained, and there were no serious effects on daily life.

Efficacy of Preoperative Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Patients With Crohn Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for Crohn disease. BACKGROUND: Although oral antibiotic prophylaxis with mechanical bowel preparation has been recommended for colorectal surgery, the use of this approach remains somewhat controversial. Moreover, the efficacy of this approach for inflammatory bowel disease also remains unclear. METHODS: This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial at the Hyogo College of Medicine. The study protocols were registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (000013369). In this study, 335 patients with Crohn disease who were scheduled to undergo intestinal resection with an open approach were randomly assigned to either group A or group B. The patients in group A received both preoperative oral antibiotics and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone was given to the patients in group B. All patients underwent preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with sodium picosulfate hydrate. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) according to an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Although the incidences of overall and organ/space SSI were not significantly different, the incidence of incisional SSI was significantly lower in group A (12/163; 7.4%) than in group B (27/162; 16.6%) (P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the absence of oral antibiotic prophylaxis was an independent risk factor for incisional SSI (odds ratio: 3.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-8.3; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with Crohn disease contributed to the prevention of SSI.

Associations between multiple immunosuppressive treatments before surgery and surgical morbidity in patients with ulcerative colitis during the era of biologics.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether immunomodulators or biologics, with the exception of corticosteroids, can be risk factors for postoperative infectious complications of ulcerative colitis (UC). Moreover, many immunosuppressive therapies including some biologics are used mainly to treat UC, and many patients are on multi-agent immunosuppressive therapy at the time of surgery. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of pre-operative multiple immunosuppressive agents on the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) in UC during the era of biologics. METHODS: We reviewed surveillance data from 301 patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and April 2018. The incidences of SSI and possible risk factors among patients receiving different immunosuppressive therapies were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of incisional SSI was 6.6%, and that of organ/space SSI was 7.0%. Doses of corticosteroids were significantly decreased because of the recent shift toward the use of biologics. The types and numbers of immunosuppressive agents did not significantly correlate with each incidence. Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio (OR) 3.0), total prednisolone dose ≥ 9000 mg (OR 2.7), and perioperative blood transfusion (OR 3.6) were shown to be independent risk factors for incisional SSI, whereas duration of surgery ≥ 252 min (OR 3.8), urgent/emergent surgery (OR 2.9), and perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.6) were identified as independent risk factors for organ/space SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Although no correlation between pre-operative immunosuppressive therapies, except for corticosteroids, was found, selection bias may have occurred due to treatment before surgery. However, biologics, calcineurin inhibitors, and thiopurines did not affect surgical morbidity in UC.

Association between Higher Body Mass Index and Pouch-Related Complications during Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, but only a few studies have clarified the effect of higher BMI on perioperative outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). The -purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of higher BMI on patients undergoing surgery for UC. METHODS: UC patients who underwent surgery between April 2012 and August 2015 were included. Higher BMI was defined as a BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Patients were classified as having a higher BMI or an unelevated BMI. We analyzed comparison characteristics, surgical outcomes, and pouch-related complications (PRC). Possible risk factors for PRC were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 16 out of 165 (9.7%) patients had higher BMIs. The incidence of PRC in patients with higher BMIs was significantly higher than in those with unelevated BMIs. Male gender (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.23-15.4, p = 0.02) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (OR 5.87, 95% CI 1.59-21.67, p < 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for PRC. CONCLUSION: UC patients with higher BMIs had significantly higher incidences of PRC. Male gender and a higher BMI were identified as independent risk factors for PRC. The pouch operation as an initial surgery may be avoided in patients with higher BMIs to prevent PRC.

Associations Between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and Morbidity/Mortality During Intestinal Resection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (O-PNI) is a well-known predictor of the prognosis of several surgeries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between O-PNI and surgical outcome during surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study conducted in the Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease at Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan. The preoperative predictive factors associated with mortality, morbidity, and pouch-related complications (PRCs) were examined separately from surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1151 patients with UC who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2015 were included. Total colectomy (TC) alone, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with ileostomy, and IPAA without ileostomy were performed in 254 patients, 736 patients, and 161 patients, respectively. Mortality and morbidity were found in nine (0.8%) and 320 (27.8%) patients, respectively. The median O-PNI score was 22.6 in patients with mortality and 35.6 in patients without mortality among TC alone (p < 0.01). The significant predictive factors for mortality among TC alone were older age [p = 0.03, odds ratio (OR) 6.8], higher C-reactive protein (p = 0.02, OR 14.5), and O-PNI < 24.9 (p = 0.04, OR 5.6). Among IPAA with ileostomy, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (p = 0.01, OR 2.3), prednisolone (PSL) dosage just before surgery ≥14 mg/day (p = 0.04, OR 1.8), and O-PNI < 35.5 (p < 0.01, OR 2.1) were predictors of PRCs. O-PNI did not predict PRCs among IPAA without ileostomy. CONCLUSION: Lower O-PNI may predict the prognosis in patients with UC. O-PNI may be a useful indicator for decision-making regarding surgical timing and procedure.

Is An Ostomy Rod Useful for Bridging the Retraction During the Creation of a Loop Ileostomy? A Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: A loop ileostomy is generally created during restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), and an ostomy rod is often used to prevent stoma retraction. However, its usefulness or harmfulness has not been proven. We performed a prospective randomized control study to investigate the non-inferiority of ostomy creation without a rod to prevent stoma retraction. METHODS: Patients with UC who underwent RPC were enrolled and randomly divided into groups either with or without ostomy rod use. Incidences of stoma retraction and dermatitis were compared. RESULTS: Of the 320 patients in the study groups, 308 qualified for the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 257 were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Ostomy retraction was recognized in 6 patients, 3 with a rod and 3 without. The difference with rod use (95% confidence interval) was 0.1 (-2.9 to 3.1)% in the PP analysis and 0.0 (-2.2 to 2.2)% in the ITT analysis. There were no significant differences in stoma retraction regardless of whether an ostomy rod was used in either analysis. Dermatitis was more common in patients with rod use (84/154) than in those without (40/154) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although median body mass indices were extremely low (20 kg/m2), an ostomy rod is not routinely needed as it may increase the risk of dermatitis. However, results in obese patients may differ from those shown here, which should be clarified via further studies.

Clinicopathological characteristics of cancer associated with Crohn's disease.

PURPOSE: We examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with cancer associated with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients with cancer confirmed in a resected specimen of bowel, who were treated at our institution between September, 1974 and December, 2014. RESULTS: We analyzed 34 patients (26 men, 8 women, median age at cancer diagnosis 43.5 years, duration of illness 18 years) and found that the number of those with CD complicated with cancer began to drastically increase after 2005. The site of onset of cancer was in an anorectal lesion in 24 (70.6 %) patients. In 17 (50 %) patients, the cancer was diagnosed before surgery; in 3 patients (8.8 %), it was based on pathological findings during surgery; and in 14 patients (41.2 %), it was based on postoperative pathological findings. Mucinous carcinoma was the dominant histological type, seen in 15 patients (44.1 %), while the special type of signet-ring cell carcinoma was found in 4 patients. The cumulative overall 5 year survival rate was 46.2 %. CONCLUSION: In this group of Japanese CD patients, an anorectal lesion was the most frequent site of origin of cancer. As cancer was diagnosed preoperatively in only 50 % of these patients, the overall prognosis was poor, with a cumulative 5 year survival rate of just 46.2 %.

Rectal-sparing type of ulcerative colitis predicts lack of response to pharmacotherapies.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is known as an immune disorder of the colon that generally involves the rectum, but an atypical distribution of inflamed mucosa has previously been noted in certain subtypes of UC, such as the rectal-sparing type (RST). As noted in a previous report, patients with the RST may be at elevated risk for disease refractoriness, but the clinical significance of RST remains unknown. METHODS: UC patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and April 2015 were included. Patients were classified as having the RST or a non-RST based on colectomy specimens or a pre-operative endoscopy. Possible risk factors for urgent/emergent surgery were analyzed. We specifically determined whether the RST is a significant predictor for urgent/emergent surgery. RESULTS: In total, 46/482 patients were classified as having the RST. Disease severity was significantly worse in patients with the RST than in other patients (p = 0.02). Urgent/emergent surgery was required for 24/46 patients with the RST, compared with 107/436 non-RST patients (p < 0.01). The overall incidence of urgent/emergent surgery was 131/482. Disease duration < 70.2 months [odds ratio (OR) 2.45], severe disease (OR 87.1), total administered steroid dose < 5000 mg (OR 3.02), daily pre-operative steroid dose ≥ 9 mg (OR 2.59), and the RST (OR 5.59) were identified as independent risk factors for urgent/emergent surgery. CONCLUSION: The RST was an independent risk factor for urgent/emergent surgery in our analysis of surgically treated patients with UC.

Surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis.

Operative procedures for ulcerative colitis have become standardized and its is considered unlikely that they will undergo major modifications in the future. Several studies have shown that the numbers of individuals indicated for surgery for colitis- associated cancer/dysplasia are increasing. However, for elderly patients, the procedure and timing of surgery remain controversial, while it is important to keep in mind postoperative quality of life factors when selecting the procedure in those cases. Furthermore, the determination for surgery in severe cases should be made earlier for elderly as compared to younger patients. On the other hand, surgical treatment for refractory pouchitis has yet to be established. Surveillance colonoscopy is necessary for patients with persistent chronic inflammation, as inflammation-associated cancer is likely. In addition, it is important to keep in mind postoperative aggravation of gastroduodenal lesions, though that is less frequently encountered.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy at Ostomy Closure for the Prevention of Delayed Wound Healing and Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is likely advantageous for wound healing, the efficacy and safety of its prophylactic use remain unclear for digestive surgery. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure during ileostomy closure. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized study between November 2014 and September 2015. Patients with ulcerative colitis scheduled to undergo ileostomy closure with purse-string suture (PSS) were randomly divided into groups with or without NPWT. The primary endpoint was complete wound healing. The secondary endpoints were incidences of wound complications. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with PSS alone and 28 patients with PSS + NPWT were enrolled. Wound infection was observed in 1 patient in the PSS-alone condition and 3 patients in the PSS + NPWT condition (p = 0.76). The mean duration of complete wound healing was 37.6 ± 11.7 days in the PSS-alone condition and 33.5 ± 10.0 days in the PSS + NPWT condition (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: Although no adverse effects were observed in this series, the efficacy of PSS + NPWT was not confirmed. Further clarification of the indication of prophylactic NPWT and its efficacy must be obtained, and the efficacy and safety of NPWT in different dirty/infected surgeries should be evaluated.

Clinical Features of Refractory Pouchitis with Penetrating Lesions and the Efficacy of Infliximab Treatment for Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Restorative Proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pouchitis with penetrating anal lesions often leads to pouch failure after restorative proctocolectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze those predictors and to evaluate the effects of infliximab (IFX). METHODS: We reviewed patients' backgrounds and performed a prospective trial of IFX treatment. Possible pre-operative factors were analyzed. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) and peri-anal DAI. Long-term efficacy was assessed via the rate of pouch failure. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with refractory pouchitis were included. Although the patients with penetrating lesions were younger than those without, neither predictive pre-operative factors nor a correlation of C-related protein levels were observed. A total of 10 patients with penetrating lesions were enrolled for IFX treatment. Although the PDAI and peri-anal DAI decreased significantly (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively), the primary non-responders during the induction of IFX were 3 patients with obvious abscesses. The 1-year cumulative pouch failure rate was 0% in patients without abscesses and 50% in patients with abscesses under IFX maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: IFX treatment for refractory pouchitis with penetrating complications appears to be effective. However, once penetrating lesions develop to abscesses, these lesions are difficult to heal.

Does Pre-Operative Multiple Immunosuppressive Therapy Associate with Surgical Site Infection in Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Almost all surgeries for ulcerative colitis (UC) are performed under immunosuppressive conditions. Immunomodulators or biologics, with the exception of corticosteroids, do not appear to be risk factors for post-operative infectious complications. However, many patients are on multiagent immunosuppressive therapy at the time of surgery. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of pre-operative multiple immunosuppressives on the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) in UC. METHODS: We reviewed surveillance data from 181 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy between January 2012 and March 2014. The incidences of SSI and the possible risk factors among patients receiving different immunosuppressive therapies were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of incisional (INC) SSI was 13.3% and that of organ/space (O/S) SSI was 7.2%. The number of immunosuppressives did not significantly correlate with each incidence. Total prednisolone administration ≥12,000 mg (OR 2.6) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (OR 2.8) were shown to be independent risk factors for overall SSI, whereas corticosteroid use in INC SSI (OR 17.4) and severe disease (OR 5.2) and a large amount of blood loss (OR 3.9) in O/S SSI were identified as risk factors. CONCLUSION: Although a correlation between multiple immunosuppressive therapy and SSIs was not found, it is not recommended that all patients be treated with multiple immunosuppressive therapy. Treatment strategy should be applied based on the patient's condition.

Advancement of Buried Muco- Subcutaneous Sutures for Ostomy Creation in Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ostomy creation is a fundamental technique. However, little information is available concerning the procedure and the associated complications. We reviewed the relationship between the ostomy procedure and complications. METHODOLOGY: The records of patients who were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and underwent ostomy creation between January 2007 and July 2012 were reviewed. Stoma complications, including muco-cutaneous dehiscence, fistula and granulation were also reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 176 patients who received interrupted sutures with removal of the stitches and 202 patients who received subcutaneous sutures without removal of the stitches. Among the patients with buried sutures, 108 received braided absorbable sutures and 94 received with mono filament absorbable sutures. The incidence of dehiscence was significantly higher with the interrupted sutures (43.2%) than with the buried sutures (31.2%), although the granulation and fistula rates were not significantly different. Among the patients with buried sutures, fistula (6.4%) and granulation (21.3%) rates were slightly increased with the mono filament sutures compared with the braided sutures, although the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. Suture removal appeared to be an unnecessary manipulation at ostomy creation. Further study for all colorectal surgery is needed to investigate whether the incidence of fistula increases with buried sutures.

Clinical features and treatment of ulcerative colitis-related severe gastroduodenitis and enteritis with massive bleeding after colectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been recognised as a systemic immune disorder that is not as restricted as colitis. UC-related gastrointestinal lesions with bleeding can develop soon after colectomy and can progress rapidly. Therefore, we considered the clinical features and treatment of these UC-related lesions. METHODS: We reviewed the patient data in our UC surgery database to evaluate its prevalence and features. RESULTS: We found 7/1,100 patients with UC-related lesions between January 2000 and April 2013. These lesions developed at a mean of 24 (range 8-480) days after colectomy. Six of the seven patients suffered from gastrointestinal bleeding as an initial symptom that rapidly developed into massive bleeding or perforations. All of the patients were diagnosed with pancolitis; at the time of colectomy, fulminant, severe, moderate, and mild colitis were presented by four, one, one, and one patients, respectively. All patients with enteritis had consecutively developed other infectious complications, including anastomotic leakage, pyoderma gangrenosum, wound infection, and pneumonia. Although patients with bleeding did not respond to treatment with corticosteroids, they responded well to infliximab soon after its administration. Although six of the seven patients showed cytomegalo virus re-activation in blood or pathological examinations, ganciclovir was not effective in its elimination. CONCLUSION: Although UC-related lesions with an unknown aetiology can occur after colectomy, immediate examination and treatment are required if gastrointestinal bleeding is found after surgery. Because gastrointestinal bleeding from UC-related lesions can worsen rapidly and may be related to mortality, early potent immunosuppressive therapy should be considered.

Prognosis following emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: Since 2000, the incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients over 60 years old has been rapidly increasing. We reviewed our surgical experience of elderly patients with UC treated at our hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older at the time of surgery were defined as "elderly". The medical records of all elderly patients who underwent surgery for UC during a 26-year period were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The prognosis of elderly patients who underwent emergency surgery was extremely poor: 8 (26.7 %) of 30 such patients died within 30 postoperative days (PODs), whereas only 1 (0.88 %) of 114 who underwent elective surgery died within 30 PODs. Respiratory tract infection and sepsis resulting from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or mycotic infection were the most common causes of death after emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of elderly UC patients undergoing emergency surgery is very poor; thus, physicians and surgeons should collaborate to treat severe and fulminant disease, to optimize the timing of surgery. Early decisions about emergency surgery for UC will reduce postoperative mortality, especially in elderly patients.

Catheter-associated bloodstream infection after bowel surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE: Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) are a leading cause of nosocomial infections. The objectives of this study were to establish the incidence of CABSIs after bowel surgery and to identify the risk factors. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients who underwent abdominal surgery with central venous catheter (CVC) insertion between March, 2006 and September, 2009. We analyzed all possible variables, including age, sex, disease, CVC duration, insertion frequency, CVC site, infliximab, corticosteroid, and immunosuppressant administration, preoperative serum albumin level, surgical wound class, and emergency surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1261 patients were prospectively surveyed. The underlying diseases comprised ulcerative colitis (UC; n = 428), Crohn's disease (CD; n = 334), colorectal cancer (CA; n = 344), esophageal cancer (ESO; n = 28), gastric cancer (GAST; n = 44), and others (n = 83). The incidences of CABSI were 6.9/1000 catheter days for UC, 7.4 for CD, 4.3 for CA, 3.7 for ESO, 3.7 for GAST, and 5.1 for others. CD patients had the highest rate of CABSI. The risk factors for CABSI were CD with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.63, dirty/infected wound class (OR 3.34), and CVC insertion via the internal jugular vein (OR 9.89). CONCLUSION: A high CABSI incidence was found in association with CD, especially in dirty/infected surgery. Thus, the use of CVCs should be restricted in the presence of these risk factors.

Topical tacrolimus therapy for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and it leads to pouch failure. The administration of oral antibiotics is the main treatment for pouchitis; however, in some cases, antibiotic-refractory pouchitis may develop, which requires further medical therapy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the applicability of topical tacrolimus for refractory pouchitis. DESIGN: We performed a prospective pilot study. The study protocols were registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, 000006658. SETTING: This study was conducted in the Surgical Department of Hyogo College of Medicine. PATIENTS: Patients with antibiotic-refractory pouchitis were treated for 8 weeks with a tacrolimus enema. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy was assessed by comparing Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores. Safety was assessed by measuring whole blood tacrolimus trough levels. RESULTS: Ten patients with refractory pouchitis were enrolled. No severe adverse events occurred. The mean scores decreased from 15.9 ± 0.8 to 7.8 ± 0.8 during 8 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). Specifically, the clinical symptom, endoscopic finding, and histological finding subscores decreased to 0.8 ± 0.6, 3.9 ± 0.2, and 2.9 ± 0.4. Nine patients recovered from their clinical symptoms, and 3 patients recovered from pouchitis. LIMITATIONS: This small study was neither blinded nor randomized. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of topical tacrolimus for the treatment of refractory pouchitis is safe and effective in the short term for clinical symptoms. Although complete endoscopic healing was not achieved, this treatment may have early rescue efficacy in the treatment of antibiotic-refractory pouchitis.